IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

92 Pages V  « < 79 80 81 82 83 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Stahlseele
post May 6 2013, 08:39 AM
Post #2001


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (DMiller @ May 6 2013, 09:33 AM) *
In the past it has been considered poilte to warn people if a TVTropes link is included (due to the amount of time wasted on the site).

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

But the times they are a changing . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasti man LH
post May 6 2013, 08:43 AM
Post #2002


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 525
Joined: 20-December 12
Member No.: 66,005



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ May 6 2013, 01:39 AM) *
But the times they are a changing . .



*looks at Stahlseele's avatar pic*

...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaFT6RVz5w4
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 6 2013, 10:57 AM
Post #2003


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (DMiller @ May 6 2013, 02:33 AM) *
In the past it has been considered poilte to warn people if a TVTropes link is included (due to the amount of time wasted on the site).

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Polite, here???
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
KarmaInferno
post May 6 2013, 01:44 PM
Post #2004


Old Man Jones
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,415
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New York
Member No.: 1,699



http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main...illRuinYourLife


-k
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post May 6 2013, 02:19 PM
Post #2005


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Tashiro @ May 5 2013, 10:25 AM) *
Or, like me, use all the rules in 4E, and don't sweat it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)


Pretty Much...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tyro
post May 6 2013, 02:33 PM
Post #2006


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,768
Joined: 31-October 08
From: Redmond (Yes, really)
Member No.: 16,558



Can't wait!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Archaos
post May 6 2013, 05:17 PM
Post #2007


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 21-August 05
From: France
Member No.: 7,584



I can wait.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post May 6 2013, 05:37 PM
Post #2008


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Archaos @ May 6 2013, 10:17 AM) *
I can wait.


Me Too... A Long Time, even...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Medicineman
post May 6 2013, 06:04 PM
Post #2009


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Good ol' Germany
Member No.: 7,015



I will have to wait even longer

with a German Dance
Medicineman
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post May 6 2013, 09:00 PM
Post #2010


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,089
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Aaron @ May 5 2013, 05:23 PM) *
There's no plebtonium necessary. We already do it in real life. All you need is a strictly controlled, tightly regulated network. You know, something draconian and oppressive in its implementation.

So somebody jumped on the cloud bandwagon. While that would explain how matrix uplinks improve image processing, it does not really account for better chemsuits (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)


And as I said to RHat, I'd be far more interested in a good reason why a hacker should be able to make people see things by waving his hands...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
binarywraith
post May 6 2013, 09:30 PM
Post #2011


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 4-June 10
Member No.: 18,659



QUOTE (Sengir @ May 6 2013, 04:00 PM) *
So somebody jumped on the cloud bandwagon. While that would explain how matrix uplinks improve image processing, it does not really account for better chemsuits (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)


And as I said to RHat, I'd be far more interested in a good reason why a hacker should be able to make people see things by waving his hands...


Without a resistance test or drain, I might add. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rotate.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post May 6 2013, 11:57 PM
Post #2012


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



QUOTE (Sengir @ May 6 2013, 04:00 PM) *
So somebody jumped on the cloud bandwagon. While that would explain how matrix uplinks improve image processing, it does not really account for better chemsuits (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

Like I said, I should stop posting before I really break my NDA. But if you're going to Origins, catch me there and I'll be happy to explain how I see it. Or come to the Why Shadowrun is Awesome seminar at Gen Con and catch me afterward. Or, if you want to get me in trouble, ask Jason at the CGL booth. =i)


QUOTE
And as I said to RHat, I'd be far more interested in a good reason why a hacker should be able to make people see things by waving his hands...

It doesn't ... hmrrrr ... must ... not ... post ... NDA ... gaaaaaaahhhhhh.......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 7 2013, 01:25 AM
Post #2013


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



Simple: One of the design problems they're after is, quite clearly, poor integration of the hacker into a run leading to the "decker in the basement" thing - it's the same reason for the noise mechanic. Of course, I rather suspect you're mistaken about the particulars of how it works.

And what gives you the idea that there's no resistance test, binary?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post May 7 2013, 01:43 AM
Post #2014


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Aaron @ May 6 2013, 06:57 PM) *
It doesn't ... hmrrrr ... must ... not ... post ... NDA ... gaaaaaaahhhhhh.......
Stay in the light, Aaron.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShadowDragon8685
post May 7 2013, 04:31 AM
Post #2015


Horror
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,322
Joined: 15-June 05
From: BumFuck, New Jersey
Member No.: 7,445



QUOTE (CanRay @ May 6 2013, 08:43 PM) *
Stay in the light, Aaron.


Join the Dark Side. We have cookies!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post May 7 2013, 08:59 AM
Post #2016


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



QUOTE (RHat @ May 7 2013, 03:25 AM) *
Simple: One of the design problems they're after is, quite clearly, poor integration of the hacker into a run leading to the "decker in the basement" thing - it's the same reason for the noise mechanic. Of course, I rather suspect you're mistaken about the particulars of how it works.

And what gives you the idea that there's no resistance test, binary?


Isn't suspension of disbelief an even more important design vector?

While mechanically, it's a good idea, it's a good one for a tabletop game. But I don' t see how it could be credible. There will be flaming about that. As a GM I don't see how to be credible to explain how unwired is styuff is 200% better. Some gear might have an explenation but not everything.


Oh gamewise, people will simply take 2 guns. Wired one and unwired one.

And if Ares want to retake their power after their failure, they could sell a Predator with a wire/wireless switch.


Well well, not convinced at all. Neither am I about why MUST a hacker have an impact on fights. Their previous idea already was a good one to drag them into action. But in fights?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post May 7 2013, 09:05 AM
Post #2017


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



I'm not inclined to judge the flavour aspect at this point - we simply don't have the information to do so.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post May 7 2013, 10:16 AM
Post #2018


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,089
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (RHat @ May 7 2013, 02:25 AM) *
Simple: One of the design problems they're after is, quite clearly, poor integration of the hacker into a run leading to the "decker in the basement" thing

Mechanics for getting the hacker on site already exist and will be expanded in 5th (more tiered matrix and the noise mechanic), combat hacking adds little to that. Making hackable devices omnipresent at best has nothing to do with that, at worst it counteracts the whole concept, because what good is a highly isolated PLTG if I'm in ur eyes, reading all ur datas?

@Aaron: If I ever met Hardy, I'd probably be too busy dreadsocking him to ask any questions (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post May 7 2013, 11:56 AM
Post #2019


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,148
Joined: 27-February 06
From: UCAS
Member No.: 8,314



QUOTE (sk8bcn @ May 7 2013, 03:59 AM) *
While mechanically, it's a good idea, it's a good one for a tabletop game. But I don' t see how it could be credible. There will be flaming about that. As a GM I don't see how to be credible to explain how unwired is styuff is 200% better. Some gear might have an explenation but not everything.

In that case, it's all good because not everyth... Hey, Bull, what are you doing here? What's with the scalpel? OH MY GOD IS THAT A CORTEX BOMB?! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAsleepy*thunk*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post May 7 2013, 12:09 PM
Post #2020


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



Hey well, I'm not the kind to burn everything down before seeing it. It's more about what the blog entry explained. If the explanation is good of the gameplay idea and doesn't lower the suspension of disbielief, it's great.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post May 7 2013, 12:14 PM
Post #2021


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,089
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Aaron @ May 7 2013, 12:56 PM) *
OH MY GOD IS THAT A CORTEX BOMB?!

Yeah...Cortex...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
binarywraith
post May 7 2013, 02:42 PM
Post #2022


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 4-June 10
Member No.: 18,659



QUOTE (RHat @ May 6 2013, 08:25 PM) *
And what gives you the idea that there's no resistance test, binary?


Well, gear's not a player, so it doesn't have pools to resist with, just device rating and firewall rating if any. Despite, you know, having been paid for with Essence. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/love.gif)

The thing I find most hilarious here is that even Unwired mentions, both in the fluff and crunch sections, how bad of an idea cyberware hacking becoming a major thing is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/spin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post May 7 2013, 02:44 PM
Post #2023


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



You're still assuming current mechanics. And assuming more, based on your personal perception. But that's how the internet works, after all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) #

'Probably', indeed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
binarywraith
post May 7 2013, 02:44 PM
Post #2024


Shooting Target
****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,973
Joined: 4-June 10
Member No.: 18,659



Quote Is Not Edit

Edit : You know, you're right. I'm sure they're going to come up with a logically consistent and rules compatible reason why everything in the world is now mysteriously hackable.

Just about the same time that submarine sails into Bogota.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post May 7 2013, 03:15 PM
Post #2025


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



The point is not that I'm sure of anything.

The thing is that your postings generally (if at all) contain nothing worthwhile, just baseless assumptions, allegations and negativity.
If you were able to package your criticism in a well thought out argument, like others here do, it'd be constructive. Yours is just spite and not really even near the point where I'd call it criticism at all.

I dislike mindless yes-men and fanboys/girls just as much as constant naysayers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

92 Pages V  « < 79 80 81 82 83 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd June 2025 - 05:23 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.