![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#101
|
|
Skillwire Savant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 5-April 13 From: Aurora Warrens, UCAS Sector of the FRFZ Member No.: 88,139 ![]() |
I know you're having trouble with the semantics here, but I think we can all pretty well understand that 'never fails non-spectacularly' means 'always fails spectacularly', right? Clearly I am not, but if the implication I don't understand what the text states is something you require to argue your point, have at it, sir! "Smoke, sparks, pops, bangs, sizzles, nasty smells, and occasionally even small fires are common features of a device in the process of becoming a brick." That line's got no real ambiguity to it, and the implications of any of the above common features occurring in internal cyberware are quite obvious. "Common features" but not the only ones. I don't see rules about how often "occasionally" occurs, can you provide a page citation? The implications are quite obvious. In fact, they're stated clearly in the rules text: QUOTE (p.228 @ BBB) If a device is bricked, it stops working Very, very simple. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#102
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,989 Joined: 28-July 09 From: Somewhere along the brazilian coast Member No.: 17,437 ![]() |
QUOTE (name' (p.228 @ BBB)') If a device is bricked, it stops working Very, very simple. Surely, but it does not just stop working. It stops working spectacularly. Smoking, strange noises, rebooting, fire, whatever. Just my two (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) on the matter. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#103
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 ![]() |
Very, very simple. Surely, but it does not just stop working. It stops working spectacularly. Smoking, strange noises, rebooting, fire, whatever. Just my two (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) on the matter. I imagine having your light-up suit flash out your bank account and PIN and then shut down would be a considerable faux pas. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#104
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
With that logic, again form fitting has no benefit. Because no matter what you are wearing that manufacturer [robably has an armored line and I might just not be able to detect the armor, but it is probably there. You cannot see form-sitting beneath other clothes (they are under the clothing after all), so the -6 penalty to notice makes sense there. Or are you saying that the FFB armor wouldn't matter because the clothing has armor? If the latter, I agree, assuming they do not do something with it that will allow it to work (which looks like they are not, at least currently). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#105
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
I know you're having trouble with the semantics here, but I think we can all pretty well understand that 'never fails non-spectacularly' means 'always fails spectacularly', right? "Smoke, sparks, pops, bangs, sizzles, nasty smells, and occasionally even small fires are common features of a device in the process of becoming a brick." That line's got no real ambiguity to it, and the implications of any of the above common features occurring in internal cyberware are quite obvious. "Common" and "universal" are very different things. Failing spectacularly does not require those features. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#106
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
"Common" and "universal" are very different things. Failing spectacularly does not require those features. Define any sort of failure, spectacular or otherwise, that would occur when your replacement spinal cord "stops working" that doesn't render the user paralyzed. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#107
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 ![]() |
You cannot see form-sitting beneath other clothes (they are under the clothing after all), so the -6 penalty to notice makes sense there. Or are you saying that the FFB armor wouldn't matter because the clothing has armor? If the latter, I agree, assuming they do not do something with it that will allow it to work (which looks like they are not, at least currently). I'm saying hidden armor is not a benefit if people assume all clothing is armored because vashion island or whatever you are wearing, has an armored version of that. Basically a hold out being easy to conceal is not a perk if every guard, cop, door man etc looks at you and says even though I can't see it I assume you are armed because its easy to conceal guns. Therefore I will frisk you and make sure. Similarly if armor is a no no in room X it being hidden is meaningless if everyone assumes you are armored and take steps to confirm past a visual check. If wearing armor is something that would stand out in the first place which I don't think it is. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#108
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 ![]() |
Define any sort of failure, spectacular or otherwise, that would occur when your replacement spinal cord "stops working" that doesn't render the user paralyzed. Um when what is failing is the part that enhances your reflexes past human and not the rest? It is something you can turn off and on after all, so I can easily see basic functions working but the enhanced part not working. Like my last car the fan worked but only the 1st two speeds of it did, speed 3 and 4 just blew as fast as 2. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#109
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
Um when what is failing is the part that enhances your reflexes past human and not the rest? You mean the whole "replaces your spinal cord with superconducting materials that transmit signals faster" stops "transmitting signals faster" and just "transmits signals"? Yeah. That makes no sense. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#110
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Define any sort of failure, spectacular or otherwise, that would occur when your replacement spinal cord "stops working" that doesn't render the user paralyzed. Probably something like dropping from sixth gear to first while going down the highway at speed - your perception of everything around you is suddenly and dramatically slowed down. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#111
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 ![]() |
You mean the whole "replaces your spinal cord with superconducting materials that transmit signals faster" stops "transmitting signals faster" and just "transmits signals"? Yeah. That makes no sense. Given that it clearly has an on off feature for the enhanced past human part, clearly it does make sense. I can think of tons of things in life that partially break and not totally break. You have spinal pathway #1 it transmits at normal human speeds, when it opens up spinal pathway 2-3 you have turned it on and now have beyond human reaction. You hack it, it bricks and spinal pathway 2-3 break but #1 which is not connected to the internet and on a physically separate path from 2-3 remains safe. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#112
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 ![]() |
Given that it clearly has an on off feature for the enhanced past human part, clearly it does make sense. I can think of tons of things in life that partially break and not totally break. You have spinal pathway #1 it transmits at normal human speeds, when it opens up spinal pathway 2-3 you have turned it on and now have beyond human reaction. You hack it, it bricks and spinal pathway 2-3 break but #1 which is not connected to the internet and on a physically separate path from 2-3 remains safe. In that scenario, there's probably some system of complete isolation and insulation protecting something very similar to the normal paths. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#113
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
Why wireless bonuses suck, thread #46282
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#114
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
Why wireless bonuses suck, thread #46282 Sadly it's going to keep coming up. When a primary system mechanic stinks this badly, it overlaps into other system discussions. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#115
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,003 Joined: 3-May 11 From: Brisbane Australia Member No.: 29,391 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#116
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#117
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
Given that it clearly has an on off feature for the enhanced past human part, clearly it does make sense. I can think of tons of things in life that partially break and not totally break. You have spinal pathway #1 it transmits at normal human speeds, when it opens up spinal pathway 2-3 you have turned it on and now have beyond human reaction. You hack it, it bricks and spinal pathway 2-3 break but #1 which is not connected to the internet and on a physically separate path from 2-3 remains safe. So bricking a gun with smartlink only breaks the smartlink then? Wow, these wireless bonuses are awesome! There's no risk involved at all! I enable them and if they get hacked, oops it's just one piece of gear that loses its bonus, rather than starting with them all disabled! Thanks! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#118
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 1,973 Joined: 4-June 10 Member No.: 18,659 ![]() |
So bricking a gun with smartlink only breaks the smartlink then? Wow, these wireless bonuses are awesome! There's no risk involved at all! I enable them and if they get hacked, oops it's just one piece of gear that loses its bonus, rather than starting with them all disabled! Thanks! Yeah, that's amazing! I mean, as long as I have a 'backup' mechanical firing mechanism, clearly my guns can't be bricked at all! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#119
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Just say "NO!" to Wireless... your life will be easier for it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#120
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 ![]() |
Yeah, that's amazing! I mean, as long as I have a 'backup' mechanical firing mechanism, clearly my guns can't be bricked at all! It's called consistency. And people are not using it. > "Oh wired reflexes has an off switch, therefore clearly bricking it doesn't leave you paralyzed." My gun still works when I turn off the smartgun system. Does it sti-- > "No." Why not? > "Because it was bricked. Bricked. No longer functions. Broken. Needs to be repaired." But wired reflexes. > "Off switch. There's a redundant system that's immune to bricking." ... |
|
|
![]()
Post
#121
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 ![]() |
That's it.. I am just going back to ROCKS.
Use them for melee, throw them or use a sling for range... Or maybe become a rigger and just dri- *Rigger 5 released* COOL! wait a se- *Sixth Edition announced* NOOoooooooooo |
|
|
![]()
Post
#122
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,192 Joined: 6-May 07 From: Texas - The RGV Member No.: 11,613 ![]() |
First off, there is no need at all for Wired Reflexes to have a wireless input. To make it with a wireless input is stupid. Look at what happens to old skool pacemakers around microwave ovens, for crying out loud. Now extend this to a system designed for...y'know COMBAT in a word where magi shoot LIGHTNING BOLTS and having any part of your nervous system directly wired to a system that Except Random External Electromagnetic Signal = Yes is a very, very bad thing to have.
Same goes for smartguns. There is pretty much zero need for a smartgun to accept external wireless signals except at a very specific frequency range (don't forget FCC regs for bandwidth use in manufactured goods). This is a device made for COMBAT in a game world where everyone and their Mom has access to scriptkits to start the HAXORZ on your shit. Be a complete bitch if <insert random jamming device here> fired up and suddenly your whole tacnet crashed, right? Well, think about how long a smartgun system manufacturer is going to stay in business in a 100% connected world when street sammies are posting on their blogs that their electromechanical deathdealer took a shit and blew the 'run when some Scriptkiddie hit it with the Rape Stick with a stock cyberdeck. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#123
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
I believe that that has been the stance on Wireless bonuses, since SR5's Inception, from the general populace. The bonuses are just stupid and not been thought out.
ESPECIALLY for anything within the body. *shrug* |
|
|
![]()
Post
#124
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 ![]() |
First off, there is no need at all for Wired Reflexes to have a wireless input. Thank you, we are aware. Apparently, in the wondrous world of 2075, wired and skinlink signal transmission just don't work any more, and neither do p2p connections. We've discussed this a hundred times already, there's no way to fix it, so why not just move on? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#125
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
assuming by "no way to fix it" you actually mean "no way to change what the rulebooks say", then that might be true.
but i'm pretty sure that many people have "fixed" (read: removed) it just fine. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2025 - 10:31 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.