IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Sweaty Hippo
post Jun 4 2008, 05:10 AM
Post #176


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 18-May 08
From: A hippo's natural habitat
Member No.: 15,984



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 11:58 PM) *
Once again, and contrary to what the anti-Cain crowd is trying to say, I didn't make the challenge. Synner apparently got offended at me saying that templates are faster than point buy, and took us on this tangent. I was trying to steer the discussion to the point where we could debate creating a template system for SR4, but I was attacked by trolls first.


I didn't say who started the "challenge," I only asked what it was going to prove.

Moved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tycho
post Jun 4 2008, 05:11 AM
Post #177


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 285
Joined: 22-April 06
From: Stuttgart, Germany
Member No.: 8,495



QUOTE (Muspellsheimr @ Jun 4 2008, 12:38 AM) *
No, you made the challenge by stating no one has "put their money were there mouth is" and proven that they could construct a working character in under two hours. Synner accepted your challenge, and now you are trying to alter the parameters after it has been accepted. It does not matter how fast Synner claims to be able to complete the character for this challenge - be it 20 minutes or an hour and 59 minutes - both are under the two hour limit.

You are trying to guilt him into doing it during one of his lunch breaks by claiming people will not need to wait - I seriously doubt more than at most two or three people, other than yourself, would be the least bit bothered by a few weeks wait for this.

Put simply, you issued a challenge. Once it was accepted, you are trying to change said challenge in favor of Synner's failure. You are the only one claiming it is unfair for him to use his personally created charts & resources for this. And finally, you are the only one involved in this discussion who believes character generation always takes over two hours.


QFT!

By now it is just ridiculous...
Everybody can buy a pdf an battlecorps or elsewhere and everybody can use is for character generation.

I am confident that Synner can easily build a solid char within 2h, but in the end you probably stat that his char as "not working" because he is not min/maxed through the roof.

cya
Tycho
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:15 AM
Post #178


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



When I challenge somebody, I flat-out challenge them. I confess to making snide comments, but Synner was the one who took it as a personal affront and challenged me.

QUOTE
This is moot though, as Synner has already agreed to your 2 hour challenge, and has not actually argued about any of your 'fair' limitations (bar the web cam, for which I don't blame him at all), but merely questioned your meaning and intent on the specifics of a couple of items.

I'll deal with the web cam issue, but the fact is that we're not actually arguing over the limitations. I've said what I've like to see, not: "Do it my way or be revealed as the cheat you are". See, I'm not the one who issued the challenge. Synner is the one with something to prove, here.

And my point is also proven: my polite discussion about a template system is ignored yet again, in favor of a misunderstood tangent that happens to be controversial. No wonder why I have a reputation, people ignore it when I play nice.

Edit: Missed SH's post. Sorry, I'll get to it later.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:18 AM
Post #179


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Mordinvan @ Jun 3 2008, 10:09 PM) *
Pretty sure we've all read the posts, and have come the conclusion, one of us either 'forgot' they they posted, or is 'creatively reinterpreting' what they posted. I'm pretty sure its not the rest of us, so that leaves......

Yourself (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Thanks for admitting it! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sweaty Hippo
post Jun 4 2008, 05:22 AM
Post #180


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 18-May 08
From: A hippo's natural habitat
Member No.: 15,984



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 4 2008, 12:15 AM) *
Edit: Missed SH's post. Sorry, I'll get to it later.

Don't keep me waiting! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/indifferent.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Muspellsheimr
post Jun 4 2008, 05:28 AM
Post #181


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,336
Joined: 24-February 08
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Member No.: 15,706



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 10:15 PM) *
When I challenge somebody, I flat-out challenge them. I confess to making snide comments, but Synner was the one who took it as a personal affront and challenged me.

Bullshit. We have already pulled out the appropriate quotes, and you specifically targeted him with a challenge.
QUOTE
I'll deal with the web cam issue, but the fact is that we're not actually arguing over the limitations. I've said what I've like to see, not: "Do it my way or be revealed as the cheat you are". See, I'm not the one who issued the challenge. Synner is the one with something to prove, here.

Synner has nothing to prove. What he intends to do is disprove your false accusations about how poor/long the SR4 character generation is.
QUOTE
And my point is also proven: my polite discussion about a template system is ignored yet again, in favor of a misunderstood tangent that happens to be controversial. No wonder why I have a reputation, people ignore it when I play nice.

Your "polite discussion" was not ignored, nor was it polite. Nothing was misunderstood by anyone here other than you. You are the one that derailed the thread in this manner, & you are the one that 'hid' your previous topic under trolling. You also clearly dismissed everyone's (other than yourself) opinion on how effective/fast/good/bad/whatever, stating quite clearly that your opinion is fact. Considering how many people disagree with you, and the subject is objective (meaning there is no fixed *fact*), you painted yourself as an uncaring, uncompromising, moronic asshole.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:33 AM
Post #182


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Sweaty Hippo @ Jun 3 2008, 09:10 PM) *
I didn't say who started the "challenge," I only asked what it was going to prove.

If you want a template system, I could recommend the following:

Templates divided by Attributes (Physical & Mental), Special Attributes (Edges, Resonance, etc.), Skills and Skill Groups, Resources (Contacts and Gear), and Special Features (Magic Foci, Power Points, Technomancer programs, magician spells, etc.), and Qualities (Qualities and Drawbacks). Listed next to each template will be the BP cost.

Example: Marksman (Skills) 50 BP
Pistols 3, Longarms 6/Sporting Rifles Specialization 8, Perception 3

And another: Spy (Skills) 80 BP
Stealth skill group 4, Cracking skill group 1, Athletics skill group 1, Social Skill group 2

One more: Bruiser (Attributes, Physical and Mental) 170 BP
Strength and Body +4, +1 Logic, +2 to all other attributes

How do they look?

What you have here isn't so much a template system, as it is an archetype build system. I'd have to see more to make a decent judgment call. Still, it looks like a good start!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mordinvan
post Jun 4 2008, 05:36 AM
Post #183


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,444
Joined: 18-April 08
Member No.: 15,912



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 10:18 PM) *

When one uses the term 'us' it is generally assumed if not outright stated by the definition of the word to be inclusive to themselves.
You're inability to realize this, or your active choice to ignore it cause me to question either your sincerity or your mastery of the English language.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sweaty Hippo
post Jun 4 2008, 05:37 AM
Post #184


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 18-May 08
From: A hippo's natural habitat
Member No.: 15,984



Moved post to another topic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:38 AM
Post #185


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE
Bullshit. We have already pulled out the appropriate quotes, and you specifically targeted him with a challenge.

No, I made a snide comment. Please show me where I said: "Synner, I challenge you to create a viable character in under two hours." Oh, wait, I didn't.

The facts are clear. I tried to play nice, and was ignored. I make a mildly controversial remark, and all hell broke loose. And people complain about me? I'm not the one issuing challenges, or kissing feet to suck up. I want to see a functional character creation system in SR4, and by that I mean a template system.

(Note also that I'm trying to keep this thread on topic.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:40 AM
Post #186


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Mordinvan @ Jun 3 2008, 09:36 PM) *
When one uses the term 'us' it is generally assumed if not outright stated by the definition of the word to be inclusive to themselves.
You're inability to realize this, or your active choice to ignore it cause me to question either your sincerity or your mastery of the English language.

Your inability to recognize smileys causes me to question your mastery of sarcasm. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jun 4 2008, 05:42 AM
Post #187


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 4 2008, 03:15 PM) *
See, I'm not the one who issued the challenge. Synner is the one with something to prove, here.

I think we are all pretty clear on the challenge situation, judging by the majority of the (non-Cain) posts on the topic.

As to whether Synner has something to prove, I just don't see it. But keep telling yourself that as well if it makes you feel better.

As to your wish to discuss a template system, why don't you start a new thread dedicated to that very topic? In that way, any useful discussion on the matter won't get lost amongst the actual Runner's Companion stuff, and the clutter of your challenge in this thread. I know that I am interested in the topic, and that seems to me to be the best way to proceed, if you do indeed want to 'play nice' and seriously discuss the matter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Jun 4 2008, 05:43 AM
Post #188


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



QUOTE (Sweaty Hippo @ Jun 4 2008, 12:37 AM) *
I see templates as separate building blocks that can be combined into a unified whole. An archetype can also be a template, imo. As for more templates, I've made a few more:

Egghead (Attributes, Physical and Mental) 180 BP
Logic +4, Intuition and Willpower +3, Body and Strength +1, all others +2

Martial Artist (Skills) 68 BP
Athletics skill group 3, Dodge 4, Unarmed Combat 5 (Martial Arts specialization 7)

Combat Mage (Special Features) 24 BP
Armor, Combat Sense, Death Touch, Heal, Manabolt, Manaball, Mana Field, Wired Reflexes


Can I take multiple stats templates?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sweaty Hippo
post Jun 4 2008, 05:43 AM
Post #189


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 18-May 08
From: A hippo's natural habitat
Member No.: 15,984



Moved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Jun 4 2008, 05:44 AM
Post #190


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



They could if they didn't cheat (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

The focus area should be gear though. The rest of it is pretty dang easy by comparison tbh.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mordinvan
post Jun 4 2008, 05:44 AM
Post #191


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,444
Joined: 18-April 08
Member No.: 15,912



Back on topic, I'd like to see rules for both hardware and software A.I.'s, and whether you can resurrect someone by having a greater plant spirit regen their body while you go off on a meta plainier quest to find their soul, then maybe reinstall it using cybermancy or something?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cthulhudreams
post Jun 4 2008, 05:48 AM
Post #192


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,650
Joined: 21-July 07
Member No.: 12,328



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 11:28 PM) *
I'm not holding a gun to his head and saying he can't use an index. I'm saying he has to use the index in the books, just like the rest of us.



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 11:02 PM) *
That's not what I asked.

Point is, most people don't have a dedicated copy of the index; and even though they could make one, they probably wouldn't be doing it in the middle of character creation. If they did, they'd probably take as much time as they'd save.


So are extra tools created or obtained during the 45 minute character generation window okay? I could fairly easily make a character then, and definitely in 15 minutes including obtaining tools excluding gear, though now I could do gear.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 05:49 AM
Post #193


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE
As to your wish to discuss a template system, why don't you start a new thread dedicated to that very topic? In that way, any useful discussion on the matter won't get lost amongst the clutter of your challenge in this thread. I know that I am interested in the topic, and that seems to me to be the best way to proceed, if you do indeed want to 'play nice' and seriously discuss the matter.

You have a good idea. The problem is that I'd like to see a template system in Runner Companion, which has everything to do with the topic at hand. Synner's challenge to me has nothing to do with it. Since Synner issued the challenge, it's up to him to create another thread to move his topic to. I don't feel it's my job to move an on-topic discussion to another thread to make way for Synner's tangent.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sweaty Hippo
post Jun 4 2008, 05:51 AM
Post #194


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: 18-May 08
From: A hippo's natural habitat
Member No.: 15,984



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 4 2008, 12:49 AM) *
You have a good idea. The problem is that I'd like to see a template system in Runner Companion, which has everything to do with the topic at hand.


So why not settle for the next best thing and have a thread about it made by fans? I just made such a thread right here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jun 4 2008, 05:52 AM
Post #195


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Shrug. Synner has already stated that a 'template system' will not be appearing in Runner's Companion, but will be released in the future in some other, yet-to-be-named capacity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Muspellsheimr
post Jun 4 2008, 06:01 AM
Post #196


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,336
Joined: 24-February 08
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Member No.: 15,706



QUOTE (Cain @ Jun 3 2008, 10:49 PM) *
Synner's tangent.

Once again, you are the one that brought it to this point, you are the one who issued the challenge (and even if your heavily distorted version somehow turns out correct, & Synner made the challenge, you are the one that suggested it), and you have made as many posts on "Synner's tangent" as all the rest of us combined, pushing it ever farther away from the original topic.

Regardless, I am done dealing with your idiocy, to put it nicely, and would strongly suggest that if you want to continue this argument, take it to another thread - of your or another's making.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Jun 4 2008, 06:04 AM
Post #197


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



Cain--There is an apparent disconnect between what some people, like Sweaty hippo, see as a template system and your vision. Can you post some examples or a clearer description of what you mean by a Template system?

I could create "templates" for a street sam and say that it has 1 physical stat at 6 and the others at 5. Two Combat focused skills at five, 1 skill at 4, 2 skill groups at 3 and 4 skills at 4.

Add 2 specializations to combat skills of choice

Set all mental attributes to 3.

The list continues...

Personally, I would find such a system constrictive and dull as compared to the standard pt buy where I weigh out investment in the character's karma expenditure vs immediate ability. From there, I look at what the other players are bringing to the table--maybe I can squeeze some points into Data Search and Browse since our hacker is going to be focussed on a more smash and grab approach--both in his hacking and the fact that he uses a shotgun.

This all shows that each of us walk into a scenario with very different sets of expectations for how we are going to build characters. My earlier statement of having a playable character down in 45 minutes, and then tinkering on it some more wasn't good enough for you. Your expectation is that all tinkering will be complete before play begins and thus it must be counted into the time to make a character. The problem with that is that as each of us makes a character or plays a character, we learn. That learning curve impacts later choices and decisions--it's true in RL and it's true in character creation.

If you are so concerned about cheating, how about GenCon Indy. I can sit down and make a character without any additional aids, and in under an hour be willing to play that character in a Mission. You can sit down across the table and watch, hell, anyone who shows up and really wants to watch me make a character can join in. I'll share my books and have a few extra pencils ready.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 06:08 AM
Post #198


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE (Sweaty Hippo @ Jun 3 2008, 09:51 PM) *
So why not settle for the next best thing and have a thread about it made by fans? I just made such a thread right here.

I'll do that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Jun 4 2008, 06:53 AM
Post #199


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE
If you are so concerned about cheating, how about GenCon Indy. I can sit down and make a character without any additional aids, and in under an hour be willing to play that character in a Mission. You can sit down across the table and watch, hell, anyone who shows up and really wants to watch me make a character can join in. I'll share my books and have a few extra pencils ready.

I live in Oregon. It's a bit of a trip for me. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BishopMcQ
post Jun 4 2008, 07:04 AM
Post #200


The back-up plan
**********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 8,423
Joined: 15-January 03
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,910



I'm in San Diego. It's fair to say the distance is equal. Barring your presence, would you nominate a proxy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th June 2025 - 02:06 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.