IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Is Shadowrun an unequal world?, Discrimination, and not just metahuman.
Well...?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 54
Guests cannot vote 
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 06:48 PM
Post #76


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (eidolon)
Simple. If one player wants to play a racist, but the other players are uncomfortable with tackling such an issue in a social, gaming environment, then those players' fun is being degraded.

i don't see why racism is an issue that must be skirted, but organlegging is not. let's talk about organlegging for a second. organlegging, in SR, is presented as an issue with facets. you've got Tamanous, who are definitely scary and evil-ish... but you've got posters saying "hey, if you need a body disposed of, i've got Tamanous contacts". organlegging is presented as a nasty, dirty, profitable business that the players can, if they want, get involved in.

does that mean that every group has to work with Tamanous? no. the choice to not organleg, to treat Tamanous as a pack of fiends to be hunted down and killed, is right there, readily available.

i just don't understand why killing people in order to harvest their organs is an okay issue to present realistically, but bigotry is not. and i don't get how presenting the material as being playable is, in any way, forcing players to partake in things they're uncomfortable with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 06:50 PM
Post #77


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (JongWK)
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Sep 12 2006, 01:33 PM)
Beyond that, "spoil the other players' fun"? Explain?

~J

I know players -a lot of them- who avoid doing things they believe could be detrimental for everyone's fun. Not playing a racist in a Shadowrun group would be one example.

What about the ones who don't like playing criminals with mercenary tendencies?

You what makes Robin Hood so notable? It's the sheer rarity of any character or RL person like him.. except in Shadowrun's sourcebooks, where you're more likely to read about a hooder than a criminal with mercenary tendencies and a sociopathic outlook.

Pthhhhhbt on that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Sep 12 2006, 06:51 PM
Post #78


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



Yes, because because presidential and gubernatorial cannidates are hicks.

And when it was revealed that the real Kenneth Brakhaven was an ork who was murdered by his own father and replaced with an imposter the verified imposter and card-carrying humanis member actually becomes more popular.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 06:56 PM
Post #79


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



Brackhaven is associated almost exclusivly with Humanis, which means hicks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 07:01 PM
Post #80


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (Arethusa)
I would say the same sort of comic, facile simplicity characterizes much of the game beyond its handling of racism.

Like politics, which is invariably done badly or just incorrectly.

The stuff in RH, for example, makes me want to piss on the PDF and the authors.

QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Yes, because because presidential and gubernatorial cannidates are hicks.

QUOTE (Me)
When was the last time in any sourcebook did you see a racist not treated like either an inbred redneck idiot, or a Brackhaven-like manipulative, scheming asshole who is otherwise completely evil.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 07:10 PM
Post #81


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (eidolon @ Sep 12 2006, 12:16 AM)
QUOTE (SL James)
Looking at books like Loose Alliances and the way Humanis, etc. is always treated, I'd say that it is in fact the exact opposite--that racists are actively discouraged.


Quite true. Perhaps that has something to do with generally intelligent people writing the source material?

What does that have to do with anything, other than making two giant assumptions about the authors and about the fact that intelligence has anything to do with crafting a decent dystopian world like Shadowrun's?

QUOTE (eidolon)
QUOTE (SL James)
But they are tolerated.


Quite so. As would a racist character, in a game in which it was appropriate/acceptable/etc.

Hardly. Show me a racist (especially a racist shadowrunner) tolerated in any sourcebook ever, and I'll show you a shadowrunner who's a figment of your imagination.

QUOTE
QUOTE (SL James)
When was the last time in any sourcebook did you see a racist not treated like either an inbred redneck idiot, or a Brackhaven-like manipulative, scheming asshole who is otherwise completely evil.


Well, I'd say the idiot part is apropos. :D


Good for you. But that just makes the setting worse for treating serious things like a joke.

QUOTE

QUOTE (SL James)
Right. And we all know no criminals anywhere are racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced. They're all liberal progressives.


Right. And we know no criminals are liberal progressives. They're all racist, sexist, or otherwise prejudiced.

Compared to SR, the real world is about 180 degrees on this. So, given my 95% comment... Yeah.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 07:17 PM
Post #82


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



Oh hell, I almost forgot. SL James, I owe you an apology. I went flippant in response to that post last night, because I misread some things that you had posted and wrote off responding seriously as not worth the time. You can pretty much ignore that post for any actual attempt at content. Sorry about that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 07:21 PM
Post #83


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



QUOTE (Demonseed Elite @ Sep 12 2006, 08:24 AM)
I'm surprised Saito hasn't been mentioned at all.

What good would that do in trying to make SR look like less of a cariacature?

QUOTE (eidolon)
Sure you are.  However, I'd argue that no learned city folk have ever held a "good ol' fashioned redneck lynching".  ;) 

Not learned city folk. But pretty much every major American city has in some way a pretty nefarious history of racism and racial/ethnical violence. Some still do. Some people also seem to not realize that there are more KKK members in southern California than in most of the South.

QUOTE (eidolon)
To put it slightly back into perspective, it is a game.  Do you see an in depth portrayal of sexism?  Aren't gangs handled with this same sort of cartoon, black and white, good and bad treatment?  I know we're focused on racism because that's where the thread went, but when put up against the game as a whole, I still don't think its handling of racism is that badly done.

What sexism?

QUOTE (eidolon)
Oh hell, I almost forgot.  SL James, I owe you an apology.

Apology accepted.

BTW, Black Sun is also a criminal organization in the Star Wars EU. I was referring to the Shadowrun terrorists, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JM Hardy
post Sep 12 2006, 07:57 PM
Post #84


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 595
Joined: 12-May 05
Member No.: 7,392



QUOTE (mfb)
i don't see why racism is an issue that must be skirted, but organlegging is not. let's talk about organlegging for a second. organlegging, in SR, is presented as an issue with facets. you've got Tamanous, who are definitely scary and evil-ish... but you've got posters saying "hey, if you need a body disposed of, i've got Tamanous contacts". organlegging is presented as a nasty, dirty, profitable business that the players can, if they want, get involved in.

does that mean that every group has to work with Tamanous? no. the choice to not organleg, to treat Tamanous as a pack of fiends to be hunted down and killed, is right there, readily available.

i just don't understand why killing people in order to harvest their organs is an okay issue to present realistically, but bigotry is not. and i don't get how presenting the material as being playable is, in any way, forcing players to partake in things they're uncomfortable with.

Here's what has to happen before you can draw a parallel between organlegging and racism:

* Hundreds of millions of people across the planet must have their quality of life negatively impacted due to organlegging.

* Many cities must carry scars decades into the future from "organlegging riots."

* There need to be vast, nation-wide movements to deal with the organlegging problem.

* Tensions over organlegging must rise to the point where total strangers act violently toward one another over this issue and nothing else.

Is organlegging there yet? Does that help show that, regardless of how organlegging is viewed in the SR world, racism is a far more sensitive issue in this world and thus must be dealt with . . . well, sensitively?

Jason H.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Demonseed Elite
post Sep 12 2006, 08:07 PM
Post #85


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,078
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 67



I have to say, I'm a little bit baffled. I see a number of people criticizing the portrayal of racism in Shadowrun, but I see few suggestions from them on what might be a correct portrayal, aside from very broad and vague examples like "more realistic" and "less stupid."

Racism in Shadowrun tends to be portrayed in the extremes because those are the major plot points that spin off shadowruns. Alamo 20k leads to shadowruns. The middle classed guy down the street who makes off-color remarks about metahumans may be racist too, but he doesn't typically lead to shadowruns. That variety of racism is part of the mix that creates the Sixth World, like the facts of life of street crime, gang violence, and poverty. Poverty isn't directly mentioned much in Shadowrun either, but we know it exists, and we see extreme examples (or caricatures) like the Barrens.

Also, low key racism doesn't express very well in the written format of Shadowrun books. I could have a shadowtalk poster who dismisses everything an ork runner says out of hand or never replies to them at all, and readers might never make the connection that he's racist. Caricatures, while simplistic, do translate to the reader clearly, at least.

On the other side of the debate, people are talking about characters playing racists, which I think is entirely seperate from this debate. I think what is mostly being discussed is a portrayal of part of the setting, not encouraging players to play it. Like mfb mentioned, just because organlegging is part of the setting doesn't mean we're encouraging players to harvest people (though, I've read here about players doing it!).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 08:09 PM
Post #86


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Gee, wouldn't it be wonderful if racial tensions were handled as sensitively as that in SR? Like I said in my first post, there are people who survived the Night of Rage, but it's glossed over like it happened long, long ago. Back then. Thirty years is not that long ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kyoto Kid
post Sep 12 2006, 08:21 PM
Post #87


Bushido Cowgirl
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,782
Joined: 8-July 05
From: On the Double K Ranch a half day's ride out of Phlogiston Flats
Member No.: 7,490



QUOTE (mfb)
QUOTE (eidolon)
Simple. If one player wants to play a racist, but the other players are uncomfortable with tackling such an issue in a social, gaming environment, then those players' fun is being degraded.

i don't see why racism is an issue that must be skirted, but organlegging is not. let's talk about organlegging for a second. organlegging, in SR, is presented as an issue with facets. you've got Tamanous, who are definitely scary and evil-ish... but you've got posters saying "hey, if you need a body disposed of, i've got Tamanous contacts". organlegging is presented as a nasty, dirty, profitable business that the players can, if they want, get involved in.

does that mean that every group has to work with Tamanous? no. the choice to not organleg, to treat Tamanous as a pack of fiends to be hunted down and killed, is right there, readily available.

i just don't understand why killing people in order to harvest their organs is an okay issue to present realistically, but bigotry is not. and i don't get how presenting the material as being playable is, in any way, forcing players to partake in things they're uncomfortable with.

...good point
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warmaster Lah
post Sep 12 2006, 09:25 PM
Post #88


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 124
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 2,072



Sorry if this has been said before. But didn't Surge have a large impact in flaring up racial (Or at least discriminatory) hatred again. The big riots and all that. Humanis blaming Metas for the plague. Not that anyone bought it.

See what the world needs is another VITAS douching. It'll bring everyone back together again. But then they'd just blame it on Catgirls so back to square one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Sep 12 2006, 09:29 PM
Post #89


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



People underwent SURGE?

Hm... Could have fooled me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lagomorph
post Sep 12 2006, 10:15 PM
Post #90


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 30-June 03
Member No.: 4,832



To answer the topic's question of
QUOTE
Is Shadowrun an unequal world?


I think that the answer is very much a yes, Shadowrun and Cyberpunk is based on the idea of haves and have nots. Or if not based, has that classism as a central theme.

As for discrimination and racism, a lot of really good and thought provoking posts have already been made. I can definately agree that the discrimination is pretty cartoonish or glossed over. Classism and poverty is also to a lesser extent, but I think it's glossed over because of the nature of shadowrunning. It's a more equal opportunity career for metas and other people who might not have opportunities in the corporate world or even in middle class society.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 10:20 PM
Post #91


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (JM Hardy)
Is organlegging there yet? Does that help show that, regardless of how organlegging is viewed in the SR world, racism is a far more sensitive issue in this world and thus must be dealt with . . . well, sensitively?

i'd understand sensitivity. what SR does (and this extends back into 1st ed, so it's not like i'm bashing the current writers), though, isn't particularly sensitive. or insensitive, for that matter. it's just simplistic and evasive. one might actually argue that a sensitive handling of the issue would not link the ork metatype so strongly to african-american culture.

QUOTE (Demonseed Elite)
Also, low key racism doesn't express very well in the written format of Shadowrun books. I could have a shadowtalk poster who dismisses everything an ork runner says out of hand or never replies to them at all, and readers might never make the connection that he's racist. Caricatures, while simplistic, do translate to the reader clearly, at least.

i'd like to point out that the way SR4 shadowtalk is structured, you've got a perfect setup for conveying realistic racism. you've got a small stable of known, recurring shadowposters that all the writers deal with. making one or two (or more) of them bigots of the non-hick variety actually would make anti-metahuman racism something notable but not a caricature. and have the other shadowposters accept them--maybe not gracefully, but as a fact of life.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post Sep 12 2006, 10:35 PM
Post #92


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



QUOTE (mfb @ Sep 12 2006, 05:20 PM)
i'd like to point out that the way SR4 shadowtalk is structured, you've got a perfect setup for conveying realistic racism. you've got a small stable of known, recurring shadowposters that all the writers deal with. making one or two (or more) of them bigots of the non-hick variety actually would make anti-metahuman racism something notable but not a caricature. and have the other shadowposters accept them--maybe not gracefully, but as a fact of life.

I'd support this- it would be a good touch. But at the same time when I buy a SR book I don't want limited space taken up with philosophical deadweight that doesn't directly add any significant information that I could not fill in myself. So I don't mind if Mr or Ms Realistic Racism crops up, but if it's more than a line or two then frankly it's a waste. I already know racism. I don't need it spelled out for me. I'm not paying for a political dissertation.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post Sep 12 2006, 10:43 PM
Post #93


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



Another thought just occurred. Writers tend to focus on the dramatic. Presumably because readers tend to enjoy the dramatic. [EDIT: I'm a scientist. Trust me I often hate this about the world.] I've written a story before with some characters who were, IMO, 'realistic racists': that attitude and opinion is there, but it's subtle. In fact you probably wouldn't notice it, if the story didn't directly concern those issues. I suspect there is room to infer such attitudes in many SR characters, but unfortunately in SR as in this world it is the unsubtle, the simplistic, and the dramatic that tend to be heard and noticed. Maybe it shouldn't be, but there you go.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Sep 12 2006, 10:45 PM
Post #94


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Stop confusing drama with melodrama.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Witness
post Sep 12 2006, 10:47 PM
Post #95


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 681
Joined: 28-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 8,319



Don't reckon I have. But it's a mighty thin line.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
knasser
post Sep 12 2006, 11:04 PM
Post #96


Shadow Cartographer
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,737
Joined: 2-June 06
From: Secret Tunnels under the UK (South West)
Member No.: 8,636



QUOTE (Demonseed Elite @ Sep 12 2006, 03:07 PM)
I have to say, I'm a little bit baffled. I see a number of people criticizing the portrayal of racism in Shadowrun, but I see few suggestions from them on what might be a correct portrayal, aside from very broad and vague examples like "more realistic" and "less stupid."


Well I took you at your word. I'm not necessarily saying I'd like to see all this space in a supplement taken up with this sort of thing as I wouldn't. But you said no-one was offering a suggestion, so I'm offering a (very) quick shot at some Shadowlands style racism discussion. And attempting to present a non-cartoony racist that you can still see is wrong and misguided.

Link is http://tarddell.net/knasser/racism.pdf.

Hope that works. It looks a little sparse but maybe it's the sort of thing you meant. I do write better when I have more than an hour. Honest. ;)

EDIT: I've just re-read it for the first time and caught a dozen errors. I might re-write it if I feel like it, later.

-K.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 11:07 PM
Post #97


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE (SL James)
Not learned city folk. But pretty much every major American city has in some way a pretty nefarious history of racism and racial/ethnical violence. Some still do. Some people also seem to not realize that there are more KKK members in southern California than in most of the South.


Oops. Clarification of meaning: You don't see "learned city folk" lynching rednecks. Not "learned city folk holding a lynching in the redneck style". :)

QUOTE (SL James)
What sexism?


Any -ism. Only mildly related, I know, but there are some here complaining that racism isn't handled "realistically", when other -isms and other negative facets of society either aren't addressed, or are handled with the light gloss of racism.

QUOTE (JM Hardy)
Here's what has to happen before you can draw a parallel between organlegging and racism: <snip>


Hear, hear. I was going to post something about that and it slipped my mind. Organlegging might be happening right now, and in some areas it might be relatively prevalent, but it's nowhere near the scale of racism.


QUOTE (SL James)
Gee, wouldn't it be wonderful if racial tensions were handled as sensitively as that in SR? Like I said in my first post, there are people who survived the Night of Rage, but it's glossed over like it happened long, long ago. Back then. Thirty years is not that long ago.


Why are you so adamant that it's being glossed over? Not mentioning it on every other page is hardly a whitewash. Of course it happened. It's right there in the history of the SR world. I agree that 30 years isn't a long time. Look how long racial tensions have been an issue in our world. But I don't think not mentioning it as a "giant major central theme" in every chapter is the same as pretending it didn't happen and that the residual feelings don't exist.

QUOTE (mfb)
i'd like to point out that the way SR4 shadowtalk is structured, you've got a perfect setup for conveying realistic racism.


Ha. Wander over to the discussion about whether or not the "small group of posters" is a good choice. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 11:31 PM
Post #98


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i think James' point is that the Night of Rage is treated as history, like the Revolutionary War or something, rather than something that just happened.

i have, indeed, poked my head into that thread, eidolon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 12 2006, 11:34 PM
Post #99


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



And the civil rights movement is treated as history. In other words, it's a pretty accurate way of handling it in my opinion.

We as a society take great pains to pretend problems don't exist (especially when they don't directly relate to us). Why would people be any different in the SR world in that regard? And since people write the history, news, etc...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 12 2006, 11:56 PM
Post #100


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



the civil rights movement is treated as history that has a very real impact on how we live our lives and interact with others. the war between Rhodes and Byzantium in the 2nd century BC? that we treat as history.

QUOTE (eidolon)
We as a society take great pains to pretend problems don't exist (especially when they don't directly relate to us).

just because we pretend they don't exist doesn't mean they don't exist. shadowrunners are where the rubber meets the road for most major conflicts, whether you're talking corporate, national, social, or whatever. forget dealing with racism as a problem, shadowrunning is right smack in the middle of where racism should be occurring.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th August 2025 - 02:54 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.