emo samurai
Jan 7 2006, 09:19 AM
How and when did Findley die? And as for Mercury, I'll have either my runners or the bound spirit of Nigel Findley kill him. With a cow from space.
fistandantilus4.0
Jan 7 2006, 11:47 AM
Died: Feb. 19, 1995 of a heart attack
Hail to the KingA little something to aid the digestion"Even a fool can learn from his own mistakes. It takes a wise man to learn from the mistakes of others." -Nigel Findley
mintcar
Jan 7 2006, 12:19 PM
Nigel was the man
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 12:19 PM
Those goold old times....
Back then, crap like Ryan Mercury wouldn't be possible, i'm sure.
mintcar
Jan 7 2006, 12:23 PM
Not sure. Wasnīt Wolf and Raven earlier than Derek? Raven had some Ryan Mercury tendencies I think. Fortunately he didnīt have a major part in those stories, and all the other characters were really cool.
(Not the book published in -98. but the short stories from Challenge Magazine the book is made from were among the earliest SR fiction written if Im not mistaken.)
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 12:26 PM
That's the difference

Ryan had a major part and was an important character.
mintcar
Jan 7 2006, 12:35 PM
The problem with characters like that is that itīs too easy to picture them being played by Steven Seagal.
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 12:37 PM
Or worse: Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible. Or Pierce Brosnan as 007.
With magic!
Sahandrian
Jan 7 2006, 12:48 PM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0 @ Jan 6 2006, 06:42 AM) |
We have tried getting away from the "GI Joe" names a bit though , and go towards something you wouldn't feel quite as akward saying in a normal conversation. Not that "50 cent" really flows though |
That gives me a horrible idea for a character name. Worse yet, several of my players would understand the reference.
Fist, from now on, in my mind you are "Fiddycentilus."
Foreigner's bad puns have nothing on mine.
fistandantilus4.0
Jan 7 2006, 12:52 PM
's better than Fist anyways
Ancient History
Jan 7 2006, 01:42 PM
QUOTE (mintcar) |
Not sure. Wasnīt Wolf and Raven earlier than Derek? Raven had some Ryan Mercury tendencies I think. Fortunately he didnīt have a major part in those stories, and all the other characters were really cool.
(Not the book published in -98. but the short stories from Challenge Magazine the book is made from were among the earliest SR fiction written if Im not mistaken.) |
Michael Stackpole wrote the Wolf and Raven stories before the SR rules were finalized. A little leeway can be given, I think.
JongWK
Jan 7 2006, 02:02 PM
Every time someone mentions Ryan Mercury, I get a mental picture of Ben Affleck.
It's *that* bad.
hyzmarca
Jan 7 2006, 03:05 PM
QUOTE (emo samurai) |
What's wrong with Nadja Daviar's brown nipples? |
Ryan Mercury is a Magician's Way Adept which means that, by canon, he's pretty much useless. He is a Drake, which means that, by canon, he is pretty much useless. He a Dunkie as a mentor which is okay because that's an edge that Drakes can take. all it does is mean that other great dragons won't be hunting him down will be hunting him down less frequently. His Friend in High Places is the VP, which is okay, she can only do so much. He is head of Assets, Inc. which is okay, he's a corporate sellout.
Now, a standard 125 BP character build with all of these traits will be worthless in the shadows. There is no reason not to let anyone play Ryan Mercury, that person isn't a munchkin powergamer because Mercury is one of the most unoptmized characters possible.
But when the nipples come out he just has to die. Really, how many GMs out there would stand by while a PC fondles the Vice President's nipples? Orbital cow, man, orbital cow.
Critias
Jan 7 2006, 03:09 PM
QUOTE (hyzmarca) |
Ryan Mercury is a Magician's Way Adept which means that, by canon, he's pretty much useless. |
...
I disagree. I will only back up my disagreement by saying "you must play in very brief, not-much-karma-or-money-handed-out, games."
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 03:23 PM
As presented in the novels Ryan Mercury has much much karma under his belt. When trying to build him during chargen, you'll need a lot more than 125 BPs.
Mr.Platinum
Jan 7 2006, 03:24 PM
at character creation he will be week liek Seth green, but with a Karma hot beef injection he will be like the Arnold i knew in the 80's.
hyzmarca
Jan 7 2006, 03:35 PM
Even with a great deal of karma, a normal magician can still outmagic him and a normal adept can still out adept him. With enough karma a MW adept can be awsome, yes, but he is always has to spend more karma than standard magic characters to be less awsome than they are.
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 03:49 PM
Imo Ryan has so much karma that he can outmatch most "normal" magicians. And that's before he's using Dunkies Heart.
Kagetenshi
Jan 7 2006, 03:58 PM
QUOTE (Grinder) |
Or worse: Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible. |
Hey hey hey, he did a good job on the first one. It's the second one, where they turned it into a generic action flick, that resembles our Mr. Mercury.
~J
Lazarus
Jan 7 2006, 04:05 PM
Well I have question about the Mary Sue character archtype. (haven't read the Ryan Mercury stuff, and I guess I'm glad I didn't.) What is the worst aspect of the Mary Sue? The all-powerful apsect, or the no negative traits aspect?
Kagetenshi
Jan 7 2006, 04:10 PM
Neither. Sometimes Mary Sues aren't quite all-powerful (though they get everything done anyway), and they usually have a few "flaws" thrown in of the sorts that get listed when HR asks you what your main weaknesses are for your annual review ("he's a great guy, but he just works too doggone hard!").
No, the worst part of such a character is that you're continually being bludgeoned in the face by the author's metaphorical phallus. Worse yet, the character is usually obviously set up as "the guy you're supposed to like".
~J
Sahandrian
Jan 7 2006, 04:16 PM
QUOTE (Lazarus) |
Well I have question about the Mary Sue character archtype. (haven't read the Ryan Mercury stuff, and I guess I'm glad I didn't.) What is the worst aspect of the Mary Sue? The all-powerful apsect, or the no negative traits aspect? |
In most fanfiction, it's the total lack of negative traits that really marks a Mary Sue. I find that to be the more annoying aspect, too.
Universal Mary Sue Litmus Test (Mostly meant for females and fanfiction characters, but applies fairly reliably to others.)
emo samurai
Jan 7 2006, 04:35 PM
That kind of "always has the answers" type usually gets written out quickly, or killed, in Joss Whedon shows. That's why I like him.
Foreigner
Jan 7 2006, 04:53 PM
QUOTE (Sahandrian) |
Foreigner's bad puns have nothing on mine. |
Sahandrian:
I resemble that remark.
I now un-hijack (?) this thread.
--Foreigner
tisoz
Jan 7 2006, 05:42 PM
I think the results I got for Aina explains why I hate Worlds Without End so much.
Grinder
Jan 7 2006, 06:07 PM
Who doesn't?
Kagetenshi
Jan 7 2006, 06:23 PM
Me!
Admittedly the fact that I haven't read it yet may have something to do with that.
~J
emo samurai
Jan 7 2006, 06:42 PM
Yeah, he's half-drake. Half-one-race-or-the-other characters have a 90% chance of being Mary Sues. The only real exception I know of is Inuyasha, whose brother's 50 times faster, stronger, and cooler. Even that's changing, though...
Kagetenshi
Jan 7 2006, 07:17 PM
There's Meji!
~J
Foreigner
Jan 7 2006, 08:07 PM
QUOTE (mintcar @ Jan 7 2006, 07:35 AM) |
The problem with characters like that is that itīs too easy to picture them being played by Steven Seagal. |
mintcar:
I realize that most of his movies are pure trash, but I *have* seen a few good ones by Mr. Seagal.
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion.

Besides, I've only seen *one* of his films un-edited and/or in its entirety (
Marked for Death, which I saw in a movie theater shortly after it was released). All of the others I've seen were edited and broadcast on network TV.
Come to think of it, though, my character in Sahandrian's campaign is essentially a combination of two versions of "The Foreigner"--one patterned after Seagal's character in
The Foreigner, "Jonathan Cold" (I even borrowed the name; I just hope that the copyright lawyers don't find out

), and the other after the Marvel Comics character.
The main difference between Seagal's version and mine is that Seagal, of course, was trained in
aikido and
kendo; my version of "The Foreigner" is a
ninja, presently trained only in
taijitsu (
ninja unarmed combat techniques).

--Foreigner
Taran
Jan 8 2006, 11:01 PM
My dislike of David Weber falls into place. Honor Harrington scores 104 on the Mary Sue test, and that's after skipping all the portions of the test dealing with "canon" characters (since she, you know, is one).
Adarael
Jan 9 2006, 12:09 AM
You win a prize for referencing Errant Story!
I ... uh... dunno what the prize is yet. But there is one!
Glyph
Jan 9 2006, 01:11 AM
QUOTE (Taran) |
My dislike of David Weber falls into place. Honor Harrington scores 104 on the Mary Sue test, and that's after skipping all the portions of the test dealing with "canon" characters (since she, you know, is one). |
You know, if you gave Honor Harrington a harem, or gave Anita Blake a treecat, you would have the
ultimate Mary Sue.
LaughingTiger
Jan 9 2006, 07:18 AM
QUOTE (Foreigner) |
I realize that most of his movies are pure trash, but I *have* seen a few good ones by Mr. Seagal. |
Warning: Derail!
I'm a card carrying Seagal fan. From his outrageous lies to his run ins with the Mafia, the man is a walking source of comedy.
I'm such a fan that when his movies come on, my friends all groan because there is no debate, they will be watched.
And I'll agree. His earlier films were good.. but oh my god, what is he making now? Have you seen In the Belly of the Beast, set in Thailand?
Don't. Avoid at all costs. Evil Buddhist priest bad guy.
Yes, that bad.
This whole psuedo-religous kick he's on is just nuts and he's be on it for several movies now. It's like the Tom Cruise thing but so much farther down on the D-list.
mintcar
Jan 9 2006, 09:22 AM
Iīm sure you donīt like The Sea Gul for being able to portray multi-layered characters with depth and precision, though.

Forgive me. I can enjoy a good action movie too. What weīre all agreeing on here is that a litterary character with the same properties as a action movie hero is a bad thing, right?
Ancient History
Jan 9 2006, 11:25 AM
It really depends on the context of the story. Superman and Harry Potter could both be seen as Mary Sue characters, but they're both wildly popular. If the plot of a story really requires a Mary Sue, and the rest of the story is balanced around that, then it's not a bad thing.
toturi
Jan 9 2006, 11:46 AM
QUOTE (Ancient History @ Jan 9 2006, 07:25 PM) |
It really depends on the context of the story. Superman and Harry Potter could both be seen as Mary Sue characters, but they're both wildly popular. If the plot of a story really requires a Mary Sue, and the rest of the story is balanced around that, then it's not a bad thing. |
I suppose, from the reaction people have to Ryan, that Horrors aren't a serious enough plot reason. Maybe the Big V should have put in an appearance. Bloody hell... I just realised(continuing this line of thought) people do not think a cyberzombie is serious enough.
Foreigner
Jan 9 2006, 01:52 PM
QUOTE (mintcar @ Jan 9 2006, 04:22 AM) |
Iīm sure you donīt like The Sea Gull for being able to portray multi-layered characters with depth and precision, though. Forgive me. I can enjoy a good action movie too. What weīre all agreeing on here is that a literary character with the same properties as a action movie hero is a bad thing, right? |
(Edited by Yours Truly)
mintcar:
Good point.

While I *will* admit that Seagal's films aren't likely to win an Oscar anytime soon (although, come to think of it, the film critics once said that about Clint Eastwood's work), they--as well as other films of that
genre--are often a nice diversion from real life.
You know, sometimes you just *have* to see a few people beaten up, even if it is fake--especially if it feels like the only alternative is to destroy your own property.
Kinda like watching professional wrestling.

--Foreigner
JongWK
Jan 9 2006, 02:24 PM
According to Steven Seagal's
Submerged, my little country has Mayan ruins, jungles, nuclears submarines, evil terrorists with mind controlling devices, a cruel dictator and mad scientists. Also, phone booths are in French, and the fields are full of goats and Bulgarian blonde peasant babes (what, did I forget to mention that the film was shot in Bulgaria?).
Next time someone complains about CalFree or the Allied German States, remember what Steven Seagal did to Uruguay.
Grinder
Jan 9 2006, 03:57 PM
Now you know how we feel
Birdy
Jan 9 2006, 04:01 PM
QUOTE (JongWK) |
According to Steven Seagal's Submerged, my little country has Mayan ruins, jungles, nuclears submarines, evil terrorists with mind controlling devices, a cruel dictator and mad scientists. Also, phone booths are in French, and the fields are full of goats and Bulgarian blonde peasant babes (what, did I forget to mention that the film was shot in Bulgaria?).
Next time someone complains about CalFree or the Allied German States, remember what Steven Seagal did to Uruguay. |
On the other hand "Under Siege 1" had it's peaks

and an interesting cast. Sadly they added Mr. Segal to that mix.
mintcar
Jan 9 2006, 04:10 PM
QUOTE (Ancient History @ Jan 9 2006, 06:25 AM) |
It really depends on the context of the story. Superman and Harry Potter could both be seen as Mary Sue characters, but they're both wildly popular. If the plot of a story really requires a Mary Sue, and the rest of the story is balanced around that, then it's not a bad thing. |
In my opinion the superhero genre has a few rather genial features. Most comic book scripts are the worst crap imaginable (but they do satisfy that need for seing people beaten up that you mentioned Forigner

). There is however potential in the genre for magnificent stories, and several have been written. Although Superman may be the most "Mary-Sue"-ish (I was unaware of the term) character imaginable, he still has an alterego to provide a base for identification. Still I do agree he does have very few sides to his personality. Spiderman may be a better example of a vunerable superhero, that young readers truely identify with. Iīm not even going to argue that thereīs a difference between the expectations you can have on comic books and "real" litterature. Because I donīt believe that has to be the case, even though it is most of the time today.
As for Harry Potter, he is certainly not in any way similar to Ryan Mercury. If a Mary-Sue is a writers metaphorical phalus, like someone put it earlier, I couldnīt begin to understand why Harry Potter would be one. As I understand it, the problem with Mary-Sue characters is that the reader is made to feel small, stupid or amoral by them, and that pisses people off. You could claim that Harry Potter is a flat character, but I donīt agree with him having said effect. Well, maybe a little since his companions gets to do so little in their quest to save the world from evil.
Youīre right that the case could be made. The difference is that these characters both have weaknesses that makes them somewhat accessable. The fact that they save the world all by themselves over and over again gets easier to swallow that way.
MK Ultra
Jan 9 2006, 04:58 PM
IMHO Ryan Mercury does have his faults (besides no reader liking him, that is). Before his encounter with Roxxy, he was somhow dumb, he did not think about the things he did for Big D (or more euphemisticaly put, he was a deadly weapon to be used by Dunkelzahn). Altho it is probably not meant that way, canīt but imagin him as some stupid siegfried-typ.
After colliding with Thomas Roxborrow, he was an arrogant asshole, or at least it fealt to me that way.
Besides him beeing all powerfull, thats why I do not like him.
John Campbell
Jan 9 2006, 06:39 PM
QUOTE (Taran) |
My dislike of David Weber falls into place. Honor Harrington scores 104 on the Mary Sue test, and that's after skipping all the portions of the test dealing with "canon" characters (since she, you know, is one). |
This is probably a better test for these purposes, being designed for original fiction characters rather than fanfic. I get a 73 for Honor (71+, Irredeemable Sue) on this one. I don't know enough about Ryan Mercury to run him through it... I quit reading RPG-based fiction after the second Dragonlance trilogy.
nezumi
Jan 9 2006, 07:02 PM
QUOTE (Ancient History) |
It really depends on the context of the story. Superman and Harry Potter could both be seen as Mary Sue characters, but they're both wildly popular. |
Remember, 'popular' does not mean 'good'. We only need to look at the list of US presidents voted into office to realize this.
There's also the fact that you can take 'Mary Sue' to a ridiculous degree. It's one thing for your character to always win a fight. It's another to find out he's a super-human and never knew it, with incredible powers no one any where could possibly compete with, and gets the most desired woman on the planet.
Glyph
Jan 10 2006, 08:17 AM
It depends on both the genre and the execution. Some authors can make a shameless Mary Sue likeable, and some genres, such as superheroes, require characters who would be overpowering in another setting. Plus, just being a heroic character doesn't make a Mary Sue!
I like Honor Harrington, mostly. I can handle her being superhuman, since the stories generally involve her running into some combination of superior firepower, complacent allies, and political treachery that you would need to be superhuman, merely to survive. If she breezed through effortlessly, instead of taking a beating along the way, then her power level would be more of a problem. The one really grating thing about her, though, is how overdone her self-effacing modesty is, and how she melodramatically blames herself for things that aren't really her fault.
Anita Blake is easier to take, because is still outclassed by a lot of the boo scaries that she goes after, and she really takes a beating. Plus, her angsting is more bearable because she has a wry self-awareness of when she is whining too much or making things complicated when they don't have to be. And she has some serious flaws to balance out how "badass" she is, and they aren't piddly little things like not being able to sing karaoke well, but things that have hurt or hindered her.
From what I have read about Ryan Mercury, he isn't quite a Mary Sue. He seems more like the annoying god-boy self-insertion type of character, like Wesley Crusher, Anakin Skywalker, or DJ Croft.
Bitten Twice
Jan 19 2006, 06:48 PM
Glyph; You took the words right out of my fingers.
Just read the trilogy again with Ryan Mercury. I still do not know what's all the hubbub, Bub. He is a bit overpowered, but I can't see a Mary Sue (didn't do the Litmus).
I'd rather have Ryan than Daviar. But that might be, because I am biased.
Aku
Jan 19 2006, 06:56 PM
QUOTE (bitten twice) |
I'd rather have Ryan than Daviar. But that might be, because I am biased.  |
Thats just because you're jealeous of her nipples.
Bitten Twice
Jan 19 2006, 07:22 PM
Nah, not really.
I like my women a bit more. C

urved.
Anythingforenoughnuyen
Jan 20 2006, 01:02 AM
Despite the desire on my part to add another snarky reply, since I have frequently been on the Ryan bashing band wagon, I feel that I should give a somewhat serious reply as to who Ryan Mercury is, with the emphasis on why the character is such a Twink.
[Personal Note: The people I gamed with in Junior High/High school did not use that word [Twink], so I had never heard it until I got to College and started gaming with a group of new friends. Not wanting to seem like a total gaming looser, I did not ask anyone what it meant [the general context was enough to get that it was a negative term having something to do with character abilities]. The word first came up in a conversation we were having at lunch one day, and after everyone broke up to go to class [my class not starting for another hour or so] I headed over to the library and availed myself to the schools computers to look up the word on the internet. I mention this only because, if you do not know what Twink means, as I did not, and type it into, say, google, the response that you get is decidedly not the way the word is being used here: Roughly, a character who's abilities are beyond what is generally appropriate for its type].
First, the books that he is in are important aspects of the Shadowrun plotline [they cover the circumstances of the Death of Dunkelzahn among other things], and he is portrayed as as Shadowruner-which is what the hope would be. That is not to say that having non-runner characters in Shadowrun novels is not cool, and that they can not give details about the game in cool ways, but for the really important books, it would be nice if the main characters were Shadowruners. The problem is that Ryan Mercury is not a Shadowruner, he is a Company Man working for the Great Dragon Dunkelzahn, and after his death, The Dunkelzahn Foundation.
He starts off as a Silent Way adept, of greater ability that it is possible to really conceive of a character achieving. He also has abilities in combat and military leadership that would be similarly difficult to achieve in a Warrior Way adept should a character focus on either of those approaches. As a result of his capture and the attempt by a crazy genetic mutant blob of a billionaire who sat on Azetch's board of directors [who attempted to take over his body by re-writing his brain to be that of said blob's, thus allowing said blob to gain freedom from his life support tank] he has all of the knowledge and ruthless cunning of one of the worlds great corporate masters [here in also we learn not just the erotic power, but also the vast medicinal properties of Vice President ND's nipples, as it is through them that Ryan Mercury is able to regain his original personality-retaining, of course, as I said, all of the knowledge and mental powers of said blob]. He briefly has the most powerful magic item in Shadowrun, however he gives that up for the good of the world. Which does not leave him in too bad of a position, as he has, in monetary terms, unlimited resources that he may tap without any sort of oversight in his ongoing task of protecting the legacy of the big D. In the process of completing the series of adventures he finds himself embroiled in surrounding the Great Dragon's death, he also learns that he is a Drake, and wins a comitment for traning in magic [now being a full magician along with a being a bad ass adept] from the most powerful wizard in the Sixth World [Harlequin].
The point of all of this being that for those [my self at least] who first entered Shadowrun along side Twist, as he learned his way about the shadows from the crew of Ghost-Who-Walks-Inside, Sally Tsong, Kahm, Dodger, etc..., there is a bit of sadness that the stories that started Shadowrun, the Runners stories, have in some ways been overtaken by other elements of the game. And, as Ryan Mercury is a sort of symbol of that aspect of the game, he gets a lot of shit.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.