Dantic
Nov 23 2006, 03:13 AM
QUOTE (eidolon) |
A man in Minnesota was shot and robbed walking out of a Wal-Mart with his new PS3. Fucking. Ridiculous.
I mean, fuck. Where are our damn priorities and how fucked up are our perspectives when we FUCKING SHOOT PEOPLE OVER A DAMN VIDEO GAME MACHINE?????
Disgusting. |
And yet...
... Not only have I participated in a run, where the objective was the latest/greatest sim/game in SR3 setting, as soon as I saw this story, I made a scenario to send a team on a mission to smash and grab a closely guarded mystery case in SR4 setting...
... that turns out to be the latest/greatest acessory for Miracle Shooter, due to be released in limited quantities.
Dantic
Nov 23 2006, 03:18 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
QUOTE (eidolon @ Nov 18 2006, 09:10 PM) | how fucked up are our perspectives when we FUCKING SHOOT PEOPLE OVER A DAMN VIDEO GAME MACHINE????? |
Less fucked up than when we were fucking shooting people over a damn pair of sneakers?
Expensive item causes involved in theft. News at 11.
~J
(Edit: corrected self)
|
That's the same thing I said to people at work, who were talking about this. Dying for PS3 vs Dying for Air Jordans.
Fortune
Nov 23 2006, 03:32 AM
Shit! We were doing runs for Tickle-Me-Dunky™ dolls almost ten years ago.
Nikoli
Nov 23 2006, 05:55 AM
LOL, I love the Wii comercials. Since I'm not yet at HD, I'll be picking one of those little doo-dads up, my soon to be roomie is getting the PS3 in a few weeks when supply is actually existing.
Bull
Nov 23 2006, 04:46 PM
I own a 360, picked it up last May or so, love it. I was hestitant to drop $400 for it, and it mostly sat and played played DVD's for the first couple months, but I've really put it through it's paces lately. Dead Rising, Oblivion, and Marvel Ultimate ALliance consumed a large portion of my free time there.
A buddy got a Wii at launch, and we played it for like 6 hours. It's far, far more fun than I thought it would be. I'll be picking one up after Christmas. Wii Boxing and Wii baseball for the win
No one has said or done or shown me anything to kindle any interest in a PS3, even if one were to magically appear on the shelves at Gamestop. There's nothing confirmed right now that I absolutely must own or must play for the system, and the graphics haven't stunned me. Granted, in 3 or 4 years, sure, we'll start seeing the difference between the PS3 and 360, graphically, but until then, I doubt it'll be the least bit noticable. Between the price tag, Sony's "marketing" tactics and blunders, and just the ineptitude all around has really soured me on Playstation in general.
Bull
Hocus Pocus
Nov 29 2006, 04:03 AM
It is looking more and more like the wii for me. Low price, kid friendly games that allow my kid to excercise to a limited fashion. The only drawbacks are no dvd player and i'm not to sure if there are any stragety/rpg's slated for wii.
Zolhex
Nov 29 2006, 05:44 AM
got courious today looked over on ebay you too can own your own PS3 for a mear 900 to 1100 bucks.
Kagetenshi
Nov 29 2006, 06:49 AM
*Waves little flag in air*
~J
KarmaInferno
Nov 29 2006, 04:09 PM
Kagetenshi
Nov 29 2006, 04:20 PM
No, it's been fucking stupid since VGCats posted it, but don't let that distract you.
(See shortage discussion above)
~J
eidolon
Nov 29 2006, 04:24 PM
Meh, says you. I think it's hilarious.
Moon-Hawk
Nov 29 2006, 04:28 PM
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus) |
The only drawbacks are no dvd player and i'm not to sure if there are any stragety/rpg's slated for wii. |
You don't already own a DVD player?
Not sure about the strategy/rpg thing, though.
Warmaster Lah
Nov 29 2006, 04:53 PM
1.) I always wait a year when a new system comes out. So it is now time for me to pick up an Xbox360.
I've been impressed with the system.
And a year from now I'll pick up a PS3. It doesn't cost that much if you plan and dont impulse buy.
2.) People were really shocked by the PS3 violence. But people are not being robbed and killed for PS3s... they are being robbed and killed for MONEY, on the whole. Friend of mine made $1500 profit on X360 resales. The PS3 resales were just as rediculous.
Hocus Pocus
Nov 30 2006, 03:52 AM
have a dvd/vcr combo thing where the dvd player part of it gave up the ghost. Whenever i tried inserting a cd it spits it back out. Had my PS2 hooked up anywho and just watch dvds on that now. Might have to buy a new player when/if i get the wii.
i've leared more and more to stragedy than rpg as i feel the final fantasy series has steadily moved from game enjoyment to fmv sequences and the like. The only game I'm still playing for PS2 is romance of the three kingdomss 8 and civilization III (picked it up and Freedome force vs the thrid reich for 7.99 each). That's kinda what I"m looking for for myself, but like i said before i want a system my 5 year old and the wife can enjoy as well.
2bit
Nov 30 2006, 05:10 PM
QUOTE (Moon-Hawk) |
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus @ Nov 28 2006, 11:03 PM) | The only drawbacks are no dvd player and i'm not to sure if there are any stragety/rpg's slated for wii. |
You don't already own a DVD player? Not sure about the strategy/rpg thing, though.
|
Zelda is your launch RPG.
and, to chime in late on a topic: sony gains nothing by deliberately inducing a shortage. The way to win for them was to provide enough units that people wouldn't go shopping around for a different system. It hurts them, and it hurts 3rd party devlopers who can't afford to publish their game on a system with a small user base.
Moon-Hawk
Nov 30 2006, 05:16 PM
QUOTE (2bit) |
Zelda is your launch RPG. |
I think calling Zelda an RPG is a bit of a stretch.
It is, however, an awesome game.
Lindt
Nov 30 2006, 06:53 PM
Here is the biggest problem. And its why Im not bothering with either of the expensive 7th gen boxes. Blue Ray vs. HDDVD. One of them is going to loose big, and I all ready have enough dead end tech in my PC (phucking switch away from socket 939...), so Im going to get a Wii and enjoy my self. We all remember Betamax, or laser disks. or if you don't, well this is your time to watch.
2bit
Nov 30 2006, 08:30 PM
hmm... would you call zelda more of an adventure game then? It's not the final fantasy template, but I thought of game like that as rpg's in the console world.
Moon-Hawk
Nov 30 2006, 08:36 PM
Well, I'm not sure what, exactly, constitutes an RPG, but you don't "level up", you don't get to make your character, you don't have any decisions to make in a completely linear plot. Not that an RPG necessarily needs all of those things, but most of them have at least one of them.
For what it's worth, gamespot categorizes Twilight Princess as a "Fantasy Action Adventure".
And just to be clear, I am not ragging on Twilight Princess. It's a fantastic game. Wonderful. I just wouldn't categorize it as an RPG.
Hocus Pocus
Dec 1 2006, 03:39 AM
I'm down home for the "classic" rpg ala the early FF titles. I long for the pixelated versions of yore and although the lastest edition looks interesting, it doesn't have that jump up and grab your crotch kinda feel like the old ones did.
echo that on the price. PS3 priced itself out of contention for me. I could just buy a new comp sans the monitor for a hundred more bucks or so that is pretty top of the line. Plus my wife would go ballistic.
xbox is a long shot possibility, but i don't see any kid like games my 5 year old would enjoy...
Kagetenshi
Dec 1 2006, 03:44 AM
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus) |
I could just buy a new comp sans the monitor for a hundred more bucks or so that is pretty top of the line. |
No, you couldn't. You could buy yourself a very decent computer, one that could do a fair bit of gaming, but make no mistake—the top of the line still floats upwards of the $2,000 mark.
To put "top of the line" in perspective, for the price of the deluxe PS3, you could buy about two-thirds of a top-of-the-line graphics card.
~J
Hocus Pocus
Dec 1 2006, 06:25 AM
yeow! 2 thousand bucks?!?! looks like my definition of i upper end model differs from most. Put one together for 600 bucks roughly not too long ago. Man if i spent 2k my wife would kill me!
hyzmarca
Dec 1 2006, 10:03 AM
A GeForce 8800GTX with 768MB of GDDR3 with a PCI Express x16 interface goes for about $630. That's pretty much the top of the line of gaming cards. Any more than that and you're looking at a graphics editing workstation.
But in the PC Gaming world "Top of the line" is generally unnecessary. No current game is going to push that graphics card to its limits.
But, one thing to remember about home consoles is that they are not top=of-the-line. Sure, they've got powerful hardware but they aren't nearly as powerful as a home PC can be. The big advantage is the hardware uniformity combined with far less abstraction. This allows the programmers to write for the hardware specifically instead of writing generically and the lack of the abstraction layers provided by an operating system greatly reduces the overhead.
Kagetenshi
Dec 1 2006, 12:36 PM
QUOTE (hyzmarca) |
A GeForce 8800GTX with 768MB of GDDR3 with a PCI Express x16 interface goes for about $630. That's pretty much the top of the line of gaming cards. Any more than that and you're looking at a graphics editing workstation. |
Graphics workstation cards generally start upwards of $1k. You're right that most of the high-end cards still float around $600-$700, though that's before we talk about silly things like SLI (you thought one $600 graphics card was enough?).
QUOTE |
But in the PC Gaming world "Top of the line" is generally unnecessary. No current game is going to push that graphics card to its limits. |
No, but it's the only way you're going to be playing current games to their max for more than a year. That or buying more stuff to swap in later (which is a valid approach, but we were talking top-of-the-line here).
~J
hyzmarca
Dec 1 2006, 05:00 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
QUOTE | But in the PC Gaming world "Top of the line" is generally unnecessary. No current game is going to push that graphics card to its limits. |
No, but it's the only way you're going to be playing current games to their max for more than a year. That or buying more stuff to swap in later (which is a valid approach, but we were talking top-of-the-line here).
~J
|
This year's Top of the Line is next years old crud. By the tieme you need it it won't be top of the line anymore and it'll be several hundred dollars cheaper as a consequence.
Kagetenshi
Dec 1 2006, 05:11 PM
Yes. Not, however, necessarily cheaper than card now + card then.
Besides, my point isn't that anyone needs a top-of-the-line gaming graphics card, but that a computer in the pricerange Hocus Pocus is talking about is less expensive than a top-of-the-line graphics card, making it clearly not top-of-the-line. How much that matters is an entirely different discussion that I'm not going to get into.
~J
2bit
Dec 1 2006, 08:32 PM
Yes, i think Sony priced themselves out of 1st place in the market, even if they had managed to produce a respectable number of consoles for launch. The only way you can really see the machine as having a good price would be to compare it to today's Blu-Ray disc players.
JongWK
Dec 2 2006, 01:29 AM
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus) |
I'm down home for the "classic" rpg ala the early FF titles. I long for the pixelated versions of yore and although the lastest edition looks interesting, it doesn't have that jump up and grab your crotch kinda feel like the old ones did. |
Have you heard of Wii's
Virtual Console?
Hocus Pocus
Dec 3 2006, 07:26 AM
i saw a special lastnight on spike tv. a gameshow highlighting the nentindo wii and saw that you could downloand the old games. That has pretty much sealed the deal for me purchasing one (though i already have the cartriges of my favorite games) playing and then sometimes seeing all the info erase when the screen blaks out when starting up the systems sucks.
playing games like act raiser. The first beautiful song i ever heard, when they make the song for the man who died.
FF4? seeing edward play the harp and pine for anna. palom and porom sacrificing themselves to stop the walls from closing in. Tellah...poor tellah casting meteo to try and kill goblez in revenge for his daughter anna dying by golbez hand.
ff6 cyan loosing his family and runing after them on the ghost train. Relm and he sweet innocents. locke losing his woman. terra being used. celis my sweet celis, so alone and singing the beatiful song at the opera house! dont' fret my love! come to my arms and I"ll hold you till the end of time JUST SAY YOU LOVE ME!!!! ultros...ha ha ha ultros..."it'll take me eactly 5 minutes to drop this weight" kefa the best ff villan of all time. general leo...i can go on!
suffice it to say. go wii!
now if the ps3 can do the games of suikoden (awesome game all around), wild arms (beautiful begining), vandal hearts (that woman singing is beatufil). I"d even consider ps3
Kagetenshi
Dec 3 2006, 03:10 PM
FF4 and FF6 will probably end up on there, as Square Enix is confirmed in support of the Virtual Console, but Act Raiser will almost certainly not end up on the VC—Quintet, IIRC, owns at least part of the rights to it, and they're probably defunct (while the company still exists, there hasn't been any news out of them since early 2002).
~J
JongWK
Dec 4 2006, 02:16 PM
Eldritch
Dec 6 2006, 02:18 AM
I currently have in my household (For my four kids
) A PS2, GameCube and an x-box. We play them all fairly frequently. But for this next round, I'm afraid Sony and MS has priced me out of their market.
With the Wii able to play Gamecube games, and the downloadable 'classic' games on tap, we will go with that - some time next year after the first couple batches have sold out. (We have had issues with bot the PS2 and GC's cd player crapping out after a couple years. Sony fessed up and fixed it for free. Nintendo wants $50 regardless to fix it.) *Shrug* We'll put the money to the Wii next year.
I really hope the Wii out sells them all - and send some sort of notice to MS and Sony that five to six hundred bucks is a bit much.
Hocus Pocus
Dec 9 2006, 06:32 AM
my birthday is a few days before chirstmas so i think I'll buy the wii around the probably if there are any left.
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2006, 06:36 AM
Just get some real games for it. I've been doing some thinking lately, and have become seriously worried that Nintendo's strategy of targeting non-gamers may kill off gaming. For evidence of this, look at board gaming—anything outside of Monopoly, Risk, and other low-quality, simple games is very solidly a niche market.
On the other hand, I can get some amusement value out of saying that party games scare me.
~J
Hocus Pocus
Dec 9 2006, 08:05 AM
it is a novel stragety admitedly. targeting the audience that doesn't typically play video games a bunch. Girl gamers (i still say that is any oxymoron) and people more concerned with substance than graphics they'll hoping to woo. Me personally i have strayed away from console gaming to pc gaming but the wii has me intereested again. Nintendo to me seems more "kiddy fied" and "wholesome" more align with familys and such. It looks to be a system where my kids and i can play without to much button smashing and complicated techinques to do things. I hope to get the wife playing again as well and racing games is what she likes. I find today's games don't really take much time to beat and miss the days where you actually immerse yourself with the game, not just play it for it's flashiness. both my kids were playing this dance thingy for the game cube today and they LOVED it. I would have like to have goteen a ps3 but their price is too high, maybe they'll come down a bit later. for me first and foremost my kids gotta be able to play it. If their happiness means i have to give up final fantasy titles then so be it.
board games i attribute to more "adult" type of entertainment whereas you go over and have a nice social gathering and you play something like that.
i apologize if i seem to ramble on but i've been drinking and watching naruto episodes
Fortune
Dec 9 2006, 09:02 AM
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus @ Dec 9 2006, 07:05 PM) |
it is a novel stragety admitedly. targeting the audience that doesn't typically play video games a bunch. Girl gamers (i still say that is any oxymoron) and people more concerned with substance than graphics they'll hoping to woo. Me personally i have strayed away from console gaming to pc gaming but the wii has me intereested again. Nintendo to me seems more "kiddy fied" and "wholesome" more align with familys and such. It looks to be a system where my kids and i can play without to much button smashing and complicated techinques to do things. I hope to get the wife playing again as well and racing games is what she likes. I find today's games don't really take much time to beat and miss the days where you actually immerse yourself with the game, not just play it for it's flashiness. both my kids were playing this dance thingy for the game cube today and they LOVED it. I would have like to have goteen a ps3 but their price is too high, maybe they'll come down a bit later. for me first and foremost my kids gotta be able to play it. If their happiness means i have to give up final fantasy titles then so be it.
board games i attribute to more "adult" type of entertainment whereas you go over and have a nice social gathering and you play something like that.
i apologize if i seem to ramble on but i've been drinking and watching naruto episodes |
This is not Hocus Pocus! I have seen thousands of his posts, and never once have I seen him rant even semi-coherently and sober without mangling every second word. Let alone after consuming a few drinks. Imposter!
Digital Heroin
Dec 9 2006, 04:30 PM
QUOTE (Eldritch) |
I'm afraid Sony and MS has priced me out of their market. |
I'm not seeing anything vastly different from when the PS2 and XBox first came out... ok, so maybe a hundred more, but I recall forking out at least a grand (Canadian, eh) for my PS2 near launch just so I could actually get a couple games with it... and my XBox ran me near $500 just over a year ago...
Ultimately this round came down to the simple fact that MS seems to be getting the game devs on their team that I like... Bioware and Rockstar being prime examples...
Sure, I game for myself and have no kids, but the Wii seems even too kid for kids to me... the graphics they display in the games I've seen would have been sub par at the start of the decade, and the one game I got to try out pre-release was unweildy to control at best. Mind you kids these days and their crazy ability to pick up new technology...
QUOTE |
Mind you kids these days and their crazy ability to pick up new technology... |
Wait a tic... did I just say that? Hell, I'm not that old...
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2006, 04:41 PM
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus) |
it is a novel stragety admitedly. targeting the audience that doesn't typically play video games a bunch. |
It's not that novel. It only feels novel because the last time it was tried (by a lot of companies), it was the only reasonable strategy due to just about everyone being said audience
QUOTE |
people more concerned with substance than graphics they'll hoping to woo. |
The Wii has less graphics. It does not have more substance. The remote enables a lot of interesting things, but that does not have a one-to-one correlation with "substance".
Plus, a lot of their strategy depends, if the impression I'm getting is correct, on people who don't care about substance. See Wii Sports, Wii play, and Rayman Raving Rabbids. It's not a new strategy for Nintendo, either, as the various WarioWare and Mario Party games demonstrate.
~J
Adam
Dec 9 2006, 10:43 PM
Tangenting back to board games, they're actually doing better now than they have in years, with games like Settlers of Catan, Ticket to Ride and several others getting widespread acceptance beyond board gaming geeks.
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2006, 11:00 PM
That is true, and a hopeful sign. It's entirely possible that there's going to be a societal shift towards general acceptance of more varied and complex forms of play, or that I'm simply trying to read patterns where there either are none or where the ones that exist are beyond my ability to perceive without significant research.
Still, a world where Age of Renaissance can be out of print worries me.
~J
Hocus Pocus
Dec 12 2006, 04:13 AM
well over the weekend and today i went looking for a wii and as expected no dice
but I'm as patient as a noiseless paitent spider, i can wait.
lol my wife found out i was looking for one and she was like "why are you looking for it you are not gonna get it"
Hocus Pocus
Dec 14 2006, 06:13 AM
no plans for shadowrun? i don't have the genesis version
Kagetenshi
Dec 14 2006, 12:55 PM
What?
~J
Moon-Hawk
Dec 14 2006, 03:20 PM
I believe Hocus Pocus is wondering if either SNES or Genesis Shadowrun games will be available for download and play on the Wii, since the Wii is supporting classic game downloads from both consoles.
I, too, am wondering this.
Kagetenshi
Dec 14 2006, 03:50 PM
No public plans. I don't know if it'd take Microsoft/FASA Interactive's go-ahead to make them available, but if so you can expect it to happen just after Hell freezes over and just before Redmond deals with its flying pig problem.
If it doesn't rely on that, the question gets more complex. The Genesis game was published directly by Sega, so it would have a pretty decent chance of coming out. The SNES game, on the other hand, was published by now-defunct Data East, who are now owned by a company focused on providing games for mobile phones. I find it pretty unlikely that that one's going to resurface.
~J
Hocus Pocus
Dec 15 2006, 06:20 PM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (Hocus Pocus @ Dec 9 2006, 07:05 PM) | it is a novel stragety admitedly. targeting the audience that doesn't typically play video games a bunch. Girl gamers (i still say that is any oxymoron) and people more concerned with substance than graphics they'll hoping to woo. Me personally i have strayed away from console gaming to pc gaming but the wii has me intereested again. Nintendo to me seems more "kiddy fied" and "wholesome" more align with familys and such. It looks to be a system where my kids and i can play without to much button smashing and complicated techinques to do things. I hope to get the wife playing again as well and racing games is what she likes. I find today's games don't really take much time to beat and miss the days where you actually immerse yourself with the game, not just play it for it's flashiness. both my kids were playing this dance thingy for the game cube today and they LOVED it. I would have like to have goteen a ps3 but their price is too high, maybe they'll come down a bit later. for me first and foremost my kids gotta be able to play it. If their happiness means i have to give up final fantasy titles then so be it.
board games i attribute to more "adult" type of entertainment whereas you go over and have a nice social gathering and you play something like that.
i apologize if i seem to ramble on but i've been drinking and watching naruto episodes |
This is not Hocus Pocus! I have seen thousands of his posts, and never once have I seen him rant even semi-coherently and sober without mangling every second word. Let alone after consuming a few drinks. Imposter! |
*twisting my curly mustache* muh ha ha ha!
Hocus Pocus
Dec 15 2006, 06:21 PM
yeah i got the snes version, but since i don't have a genesie i didn't get the sega one. The sega one's mechanics were definately better
blakkie
Dec 15 2006, 07:39 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Dec 9 2006, 10:41 AM) |
The Wii has less graphics. It does not have more substance. The remote enables a lot of interesting things, but that does not have a one-to-one correlation with "substance". |
The top end resolution for the Wii is lower, which isn't really "less graphics". But less or more "substance" is entirely qualified by what "substance" you are looking for. If the substance is
fun instead of the top end of HD resolutions? Well then it could be arguable that Nintendo's priorities with the Wii's place substance over graphics resolution, oh and cheap (and turning a profit selling the actual game machines rather than having the machine as a lead-loss). I've only played a little bit in a stand in the mall, but I find even the dinkly little demo games that come with the system are
fun.
2bit
Dec 15 2006, 07:48 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Dec 9 2006, 11:41 AM) |
Plus, a lot of their strategy depends, if the impression I'm getting is correct, on people who don't care about substance. See Wii Sports, Wii play, and Rayman Raving Rabbids. It's not a new strategy for Nintendo, either, as the various WarioWare and Mario Party games demonstrate.
~J |
Yeah.
Nintendo sees games more as toys than some daring new interactive storytelling medium of the future. I think that sums up their philosophy of fun.
Kagetenshi
Dec 15 2006, 08:10 PM
QUOTE (blakkie) |
The top end resolution for the Wii is lower, which isn't really "less graphics". |
It is. Besides, are you really claiming that the Wii will be able to stick the same number of polygons, for example, onscreen at a time that the 360 or PS3 will? Even at the lower resolution?
QUOTE |
But less or more "substance" is entirely qualified by what "substance" you are looking for. If the substance is fun instead of the top end of HD resolutions? |
(FYI: I can't use your link as evidence for your argument, as YouTube wants me to register with them to view it, which I will under no circumstances do)
That said, you've managed to replace a word that needs defining with another word that needs defining. Some people have fun looking at pretty things. More importantly, though, some people have fun with things like processor-intensive AI or physics. Some people also have fun with interesting input methods.
QUOTE |
Well then it could be arguable that Nintendo's priorities with the Wii's place substance over graphics resolution |
Yes. And if I define "substance" as "wood", I could argue that the lumber industry places substance over graphics resolution. At least I've given a meaning to the whole equation, rather than added in another unknown.
~J