Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: SR4 Shadowtalk
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
Particle_Beam
Commiting suicide, because the last 3000 years were more than terribly boring, with no magic around, so that they shouldn't even have survived till the begin of the sixth world. nyahnyah.gif
neko128
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
QUOTE (knasser @ Aug 11 2007, 09:31 PM)
There was a conversation between Harlequin and another (I have a William Blake reference in my head for some reason) in one of the books that revealed a very substantial understanding of the Matrix by the Laughing Man.

your thinking of the one at the start of VR2.0. its one of my favorites.

AH has it up on the site, with annotations.

As a side note, there's this comment at the end:

>>>>>[I know what you mean. I know, better than most, what is coming this time. But there has never been anything like the Matrix before. How this new cosmos will combine with the powers of the old, I don't know. Maybe the wall between them will stay up, maybe it won't. Right now it seems solid but next year? Or next decade? Even we can't begin to guess.]<<<<<
-Laughing Man (??question.gif?question.gif?/12-24-56)

I find it interesting that wasn't commented relative to AR after the big Crash. I mean, post-crash, the wall between the worlds has most definitely come down...
knasser
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
What exactly is there for immortals to do other than treat the world like a giant Risk board and bicker inanely with each other on the internet?


In the case of Harlequin (my favourite immortal), cultivate a sense of the sardonic to superhuman levels as a means of preserving his sanity through the ages.

In the case of Ehran the Scribe, revise one's memoirs (he's still only currently on volume three, he's that fussy). More seriously, he fights an unwinnable war to bring about culture and learning and elven supremacy. Which also gives H. someone to mess with if the strain of the millenia gets too much on occasion.

In the case of the dragons, just bask in the astral sunshine for as long as the mana is up and occasionally squabble over territory - they come from reptile stock, after all. If any life form is prepared for whiling away the centuries, it's them.

As to the other immortal elves, there aren't that many of them (may seem it at times). We can guess that there may have been more and that these are the ones that didn't get killed in the intervening millenia. I think they must all be characters with very strong drives and goals to maintain who they are over all that time.
MITJA3000+
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
What exactly is there for immortals to do other than treat the world like a giant Risk board and bicker inanely with each other on the internet?

Get totally, absolutely, utterly wasted.
Dashifen
I don't think I'd want to meet a great dragon whose inhibitions are lowered eek.gif
Ancient History
Well, Damon will probably cut back on the sauce by the time he hits that time of life, so you shouldn't have too much to worry about.
knasser
QUOTE (Dashifen @ Aug 12 2007, 02:47 PM)
I don't think I'd want to meet a great dragon whose inhibitions are lowered eek.gif


<slurred German accent>"Go-onn... pull my talon..."</slurred German accent>

*sound of flame eruption and scream of PC*

"Heh heh heh! Hic!"
hobgoblin
oh the horror...
NightmareX
QUOTE (Particle_Beam)
It's only that they started to behave like little quarrelling children instead of the mysterious and aloof beings of the fourth world that is somehow diminishing the supposed awe they should inspire, and became more and more drama children. Also, the fact that quite every one of them ended particularely on Shadowland was somehow quite strange.

IMO, quarreling children is exactly what interactions between such beings would be like. Look at the Greek gods or modern vampire fiction. When that level of power and longevity is reached, IMO megalomania is virtually unavoidable - especially when there's only a couple dozen odd beings in the world that come even close to understanding your frame of reference. After all, we're talking about beings that couldn't come together and play nicely to even talk about an impending threat to all life on the planet - they had to be conned into doing it (ie Aztlan sourcebook). These are egos of unbelievable proportions - of course they're going to act like pre-school prima donnas.
Fuchs
Which kind of makes it a bit unrealistic that they are still powerful. In my campaign, any such immature immortals would be flattened by the megacorps without much effort if they acted up. The only ones that matter are those who play the corp game, which means Lofwyr mainly - the immortal elves, if they even are immortal in my campaign, are pawns, not players, left behind by the modern world and its conventions.
Rotbart van Dainig
Actually, that would apply only to dragons and spirits... the other immortals were around the whole time just fine.
neko128
To second Rotbart's comment; I don't understand why so many people seem to think the Immortal Elves would be afraid of technology; they're all incredibly intelligent, adaptable (by necessity) people who have been alive for the entire industrialization of the planet. Take a look at Leonardo/Brightlight; certainly noone can argue he's on the wrong end of the technology curve.

There's no reason at all to assume they're out of touch. If anything, in my mind, the centuries they've been through and the massive changes they've seen would prepare them more for the steamrolling pace of technology than your average suburbanite; I mean, they've seen far more technologies come and go than you or I. Why wouldn't they be more adaptable, having realized just how short-lived most paradigms really are?
bibliophile20
And there's one other advantage that they had when it came to learning the advanced stuff:

Time to really soak up the basics.

I have a friend who is an engineering major; he thinks, at the rate we're advancing, we're going to have to start teaching calculus in high school, if not junior high or middle school.

But they were around for those discoveries and had plenty of time to learn and integrate them into their understanding and knowledge. It's one thing to have a year to learn all there is to calculus and then have to rush off to the next stage of more advanced math--it's quite another to have a decade to learn it all and study all of it's implications and then leisurely make one's way over to the next mathematical or scientific discovery.
Jaid
QUOTE (bibliophile20)
I have a friend who is an engineering major; he thinks, at the rate we're advancing, we're going to have to start teaching calculus in high school, if not junior high or middle school.

i dunno what they've been teaching in your high schools, but mine included a calculus course. it wasn't required, but it was available, just as a standard class across the entire schoolboard. (probably across the province)
TheOneRonin
I graduated in 93, and Calculus was an available elective for Seniors. What I think Bibliophile20 is saying is that it won't be long before one is required to take and pass calculus in order to graduate high school.
hobgoblin
so we may have hit a point where the total knowledge is to much for any single person to absorb in a lifetime? that we may need to being specializing from a very early age?
knasser
QUOTE (bibliophile20)
And there's one other advantage that they had when it came to learning the advanced stuff:

Time to really soak up the basics.


This is a really important point. I've taught mathematics to children, and it's crucially important that they learn each step, because you can only really understand the next bit if you've understood the parts before. This is why so many people think they're bad at maths, as opposed to finding History or English or any other "non-sequential" subject much easier.

We should make a distincition between immortals like Harlequinn, who probably loved the invention of the motorcar and spent happy weeks taking apart Model T Fords and putting them together again, and those like the great dragons who simply woke up one day to see all these little metal boxes whizzing around without horses. Not that I think dragons wouldn't adapt very, very quickly, but the non-sleeping immortals would likely have an edge.
hobgoblin
somehow i have a feel that a dragon reading up on stuff would be like data from star trek. always telling the computers to display the information faster...
hyzmarca
The IEs are master manipulators and schemers. They never show their real faces to the mortals around them. However, the other immortals know then so well that they can simply let their hair down and be themselves, this is very freeing, but also very dangerous. The know each other well enough to hate each other. In general, there are enough rivalries between the IEs that a physical gathering would probably result in bloodshed. So they snipe at each other over the matrix because they are, at the same time, best friends and worst enemas. The anonymity of the screen give them an extra layer of protection.
knasser
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
so we may have hit a point where the total knowledge is to much for any single person to absorb in a lifetime? that we may need to being specializing from a very early age?


I don't think we're even close to that. And we can lengthen the human lifespan, anyway. But we may well be hitting the point where society needs to adjust its view on what constitutes a reasonable length of time for education. Specialisation is distinctly not the answer. The UK government is nudging schools toward more vocational training. It's a deeply, deeply misguided policy. Teach someone maths? Yes - eternally useful and can be applied to any relevant technology. Give someone a qualification in Excel? Oooh - that'll be useful. >:-[
hobgoblin
QUOTE (knasser)
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Aug 13 2007, 08:25 PM)
so we may have hit a point where the total knowledge is to much for any single person to absorb in a lifetime? that we may need to being specializing from a very early age?


I don't think we're even close to that. And we can lengthen the human lifespan, anyway. But we may well be hitting the point where society needs to adjust its view on what constitutes a reasonable length of time for education. Specialisation is distinctly not the answer. The UK government is nudging schools toward more vocational training. It's a deeply, deeply misguided policy. Teach someone maths? Yes - eternally useful and can be applied to any relevant technology. Give someone a qualification in Excel? Oooh - that'll be useful. >:-[

true that. teach someone how to use photoshop and he will be a adobe customer until he dies.

teach him the theories behind digital image creation and manipulation and he should be able to use any program that does the job.

problem is that teaching theory takes longer then teaching "click here, here here, type some numbers, hit enter and take a coffee while it computes".

short term workforce goals are more important in our competitive capitalist world then long term understanding is.

what the system "needs" is a whole lot of trained monkeys and a human supervisor that can pick up when the "programmed" responses fail.
Rotbart van Dainig
That's why Microsoft donates software to students.
Fortune
There's a commercial over here in Oz (concrete, irrefutable evidence, I know wink.gif) that states that today's 8 year old has been exposed to more information than our grandfathers were in their entire lives.

Makes you stop and think.
fool
QUOTE
let's suppose you're a pretty good decker.

dunkelzahn offers you 50,000  to get him into shadowlands. you gonna tell him no?

so sure, he may or may not know the matrix, but he's:

dead
[QUOTE]I really do miss the immortals, just because of the little hints they gave about that metaplot. But, at the same time, it was REALLY silly that they would post to Shadowland. Like, for what reason? Shouldn't they be scheming and manipulating all the time?[QUOTE]
what better way to manipulate the shadows than spreading the info you want spread?
hobgoblin
QUOTE (Fortune @ Aug 13 2007, 11:17 PM)
There's a commercial over here in Oz (concrete, irrefutable evidence, I know wink.gif) that states that today's 8 year old has been exposed to more information than our grandfathers were in their entire lives.

Makes you stop and think.

not impossible.

its also a greater variation of information. and lets not forget disinformation...

it just dawned on me that most recent discoveries are done when information cross barriers of "education". i recently heard about a geologist that could refute a archaeological "fact".

hell, i have experienced that when you stare at a problem to long, it becomes unsolvable. one have to take a step back and look at a different way of solving it...

it may also be that we dont have to know everything, we just need to understand how to ask good questions wink.gif or in other words, how to formulate good search parameters...
bibliophile20
QUOTE (TheOneRonin)
I graduated in 93, and Calculus was an available elective for Seniors. What I think Bibliophile20 is saying is that it won't be long before one is required to take and pass calculus in order to graduate high school.

Bingo, which means that I would be in trouble (try as I might, I can't wrap my head around all the finicky little details of calculus, and I've got the remedial class scores to prove it).

But, yeah, his exact comment was "Today, we start teaching people calculus in late high school or in college. The way things are going, in fifty years we're going to have to start teaching them precalc by the time they're ten."

And as for the point, knasser's got it to a tee; while people have a hard time keeping up with the rate of progress, it's for a simple reason: they simply don't have the training to understand it all, nor do they have the time or energy to commit to be able to get that training. But, when you've had decades and centuries to work it all out and integrate the knowledge...
Fuchs
QUOTE (neko128)
Take a look at Leonardo/Brightlight; certainly noone can argue he's on the wrong end of the technology curve.

Leonardo is actually the best example for why the immortal elves are just a bunch of idiots: He could hack all 7 megacorps' mainframes at the same time, yet was so utterly, unbelievably dumb as to use this incredible feat to try to blackmail them for the - paltry - sum of 20 billions, instead of simply taking that amount of money from various sources and using his incredible skills to hide the operation?

Yeah, right.

Sorry, I know I'll offend all the elf fanboys, but the manner in which those elves are protrayed simply does not make me take them seriously. They do act much more stupid than most shadowrunners, and seem to rely on GM fiat and railroading much more than actual skill or smarts.

So, in my campaign, immortal elves are small bit players next to the megacorps, if I had them.
Rotbart van Dainig
QUOTE (Fuchs)
Leonardo is actually the best example for why the immortal elves are just a bunch of idiots:

No, that just proves that brilliant scientists sometimes aren't that clever when it comes to simple things. Newsflash.
Fuchs
There's "not that clever" and there is "How stupid are you? And all your helpers? Even rocks are smarter than that!".

As long as the immortal elves are portrayed as teenagers with superpowers I won't use them. They are simply not believably written.
Wakshaani
We try not to talk about Leonardo. That was a Dark Time, he's gone now, and the game's better for it.

Kinda like Quicksilver from Imago.

Shadowrun's own Clone Saga. smile.gif
Fortune
QUOTE (Wakshaani)
... he's gone now ...

Keep thinking that. smile.gif
hobgoblin
err, was he in the game, or was he a character from the novels?

often the novels seems to play fast and loose when it came to what can and cant be done...
neko128
QUOTE (hobgoblin)
err, was he in the game, or was he a character from the novels?

often the novels seems to play fast and loose when it came to what can and cant be done...

He was a character in a novel, but at the very least he's also been referred to in the various Shadowtalk commentaries.
darthmord
QUOTE (bibliophile20)
QUOTE (TheOneRonin @ Aug 13 2007, 04:17 PM)
I graduated in 93, and Calculus was an available elective for Seniors.  What I think Bibliophile20 is saying is that it won't be long before one is required to take and pass calculus in order to graduate high school.

Bingo, which means that I would be in trouble (try as I might, I can't wrap my head around all the finicky little details of calculus, and I've got the remedial class scores to prove it).

But, yeah, his exact comment was "Today, we start teaching people calculus in late high school or in college. The way things are going, in fifty years we're going to have to start teaching them precalc by the time they're ten."

And as for the point, knasser's got it to a tee; while people have a hard time keeping up with the rate of progress, it's for a simple reason: they simply don't have the training to understand it all, nor do they have the time or energy to commit to be able to get that training. But, when you've had decades and centuries to work it all out and integrate the knowledge...

The same thing was evident in Stargate: SG-1 when SG-1 met the Tollan.

Narim & Sam had a conversation about the Tollan making their own Stargate. When asked about it, Narim told her that it was a simple thing for them to do and understand.

It turned out that the Tollan teach Quantum Mechanics to 3rd graders.

Then again, the history of the Tollan was such that they suffered no "dark ages" like Earth had. As such, they were 800 to 1000 years more advanced.
hobgoblin
QUOTE (neko128)
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Aug 14 2007, 11:10 AM)
err, was he in the game, or was he a character from the novels?

often the novels seems to play fast and loose when it came to what can and cant be done...

He was a character in a novel, but at the very least he's also been referred to in the various Shadowtalk commentaries.

ye crap...
hyzmarca
QUOTE (darthmord @ Aug 14 2007, 12:29 PM)
QUOTE (bibliophile20 @ Aug 13 2007, 08:49 PM)
QUOTE (TheOneRonin @ Aug 13 2007, 04:17 PM)
I graduated in 93, and Calculus was an available elective for Seniors. What I think Bibliophile20 is saying is that it won't be long before one is required to take and pass calculus in order to graduate high school.

Bingo, which means that I would be in trouble (try as I might, I can't wrap my head around all the finicky little details of calculus, and I've got the remedial class scores to prove it).

But, yeah, his exact comment was "Today, we start teaching people calculus in late high school or in college. The way things are going, in fifty years we're going to have to start teaching them precalc by the time they're ten."

And as for the point, knasser's got it to a tee; while people have a hard time keeping up with the rate of progress, it's for a simple reason: they simply don't have the training to understand it all, nor do they have the time or energy to commit to be able to get that training. But, when you've had decades and centuries to work it all out and integrate the knowledge...

The same thing was evident in Stargate: SG-1 when SG-1 met the Tollan.

Narim & Sam had a conversation about the Tollan making their own Stargate. When asked about it, Narim told her that it was a simple thing for them to do and understand.

It turned out that the Tollan teach Quantum Mechanics to 3rd graders.

Then again, the history of the Tollan was such that they suffered no "dark ages" like Earth had. As such, they were 800 to 1000 years more advanced.

And this is the point where, in Stargate message boards, I get up on my soapbox and tell everyone that there is no such thing as linear technological advance, particularly with respect to time.

Technological advancement, generally speaking, fits a need-fulfillment-exploitation model. A need is identified, someone invents a novel way to fulfill that need, and someone develops novel ways to exploit the new invention.

If an invention does not fulfill an existing need, it will fall by the wayside of history. The available needs that an invention might fulfill are limited by the culture in which that invention is developed.

A good example is the steam engine. The steam engine was invented sometime between 10 AD and 70AD be a fellow known as Hero of Alexandria.
But what, you say; the steam engine was invented by Thomas Newcomen and Thomas Savery in 1717. Yes, it was. It was also invented by Taqi al-Din of the Ottoman Empire in the 16th Century AD and by Giovanni Branca in 1629.

But, inventing the steam engine and starting the Industrial Revolution are to completely different things. Without a socioeconomic need for the steam engine, it will fade into obscurity. Globe-spanning Naval Empires just happen to have that socioeconomic need in a way that single-continent empires just don't have.


Black Madonna, the big Leonardo novel, is basically The Da Vinci Code with substantially less suckage.
Ancient History
QUOTE (hyzmarca)
Black Madonna, the big Leonardo novel, is basically The Da Vinci Code with substantially less suckage.

Quoted for truth. Imagine what it says about an author when a game novel is at least as well 'researched' and much better written than their blockbuster.

darthmord
hyz, I understand where you are coming from. I was just commenting / agreeing with the idea (mentioned earlier using Calculus as the example) that over time, the more advanced things of today become the basics of tomorrow and that such was exampled in Stargate: SG-1.

I wasn't commenting on how practical / sensible the presentation was in Stargate.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012