Ol' Scratch
Dec 7 2003, 06:52 PM
Especially considering that Jazz was designed by Lone Star for the run-of-the-mill non-elite Lone Star cops.
Tanka
Dec 7 2003, 07:01 PM
Oh, also, remember... The average LS group has a Combat Mage, possibly an Adept, maybe a Medic and a Tactician, and a few grunts to do the majority of the shooting. They pull up after the Mage tells them who the head mojo is in the group and cack him first, then the rest goes downhill from there.
The number one runner rule also applies to LS:
Geek the mage first!
Velocity
Dec 7 2003, 07:02 PM
QUOTE |
tanka wrote: Will all LS cops have a Smartlink? Anybody want to look up the legality meaning for 5P-N? Even the cops aren't above the law. |
Hence the "P" part of the rating: they require permits in order to use these weapons. I'm willing to bet that a Lone Star employee doesn't usually have a real hard time getting weapons permits.
QUOTE |
TinkerGnome wrote: A set of smartgoggles is more likely to be reusable, but (and here's the big but), it's far more likely that the perp who killed the officer could aquire the hardware and use it to cause more trouble for the cops. |
That's an excellent point: the last thing LS wants is more smartgoggles flooding the street 'cause eventually, it'll just make their life harder: can you imagine the drop in morale once employees start dying after run-ins with gangers sporting Star-issue smart goggles? "The blood on the goggles isn't even dry and the bastards are using them against us!"
QUOTE |
TinkerGnome wrote: Canon stats for LS beat cops include a Thunderbolt with a laser sight and a radio and comlink but no smartlink tech. So that seems to be the official answer. |
That's true, but I initiated this question under the premise that the canonical description of LS gear and/or cyberware was perhaps slightly implausible.
Tanka
Dec 7 2003, 07:09 PM
Yes, but how many other security groups will know a street cop with LS has a permit?
They see a guy with a SLII running towards them. His gun is pulled, and he's shouting frantically. Do the security forces know he's with LS on the street beat? What do they do? Probably open fire.
I doubt the street guys will have SLI or II. Maybe the "official" team might. This is also why their sanctioned gun has a Laser Sight and they most always carry a riot shield in their car. Not only extra armor and partial cover, but it means they might just be able to stay alive long enough to actually geek the guy shooting them.
Again, I refer to the fact that they work as a team, not by themselves. If the street guy comes under fire, what does he do? Calls for backup! If an LS group just lost all but one member, what does that member do? Calls for backup!
And, again, you can bet your hoop they'll be sending in the big boys to blow your hoop up.
Velocity
Dec 7 2003, 07:56 PM
That's a very specific scenario you're suggesting and probably not one that occurs very often; certainly not often enough for Lone Star Inc. to structure corporate policy around. Besides, I'd imagine most LS employees have enough sense to not go running at corporate security guards while waving their gun around. Finally, if a corporate security team, while patrolling their employer's grounds, encounters a
uniformed Lone Star employee, they (hopefully) have been trained to ask questions first before opening fire.
Also, how exactly could the security guards detect what kind of cyberware the Star was equipped with? "Crikey, that woman wearing the Lone Star uniform is devilishly accurate with her standard-issue Ruger sidearm... she must be smartlinked--get her!"

If all else fails and a gunfight erupts between the Star and some corp's guards, well... it happens occasionally. Then one side sues the hell out of the other and the whole mess gets bumped into the litigous arena.

Your point about LS working as a team is taken: they definitely function as a unit with appropriate back-up and contingency measures for different situations. My only point is that smartlinks are relatively inexpensive and with some sort of employee incentive plan in place, there's no reason why most officers wouldn't have one:
QUOTE |
Nova wrote: So borrow a concept from the Roman army. They used to assign armor to each new soldier, and garnish 30% of their first year's wages.
So for Lone Star,you make the adoption of a smartlink voluntary, so new recruits don't have to shell out (have their wages garnished) for a smartlink if they don't want to, but you make promotions past a certain level require a smartlink.
So no cop is forced to have invasive surgery...unless you want to make detective. The cost to Lonestar? Apart from arranging the discounts and medical facilities...none. |
thunderchild
Dec 8 2003, 02:07 AM
*dials telephone* Hello, Is this dead horse deliveries, id like to order a corpse... Something suitable for flogging... I can find one at dumpshock? Oh, flogged several tmes before you say, well, much appreciated. *click*
Tanka
Dec 8 2003, 02:08 AM
That's what's so great about DS! You can beat said dead horse until there is no more of it, then beat it some more!
Kagetenshi
Dec 8 2003, 03:14 AM
To steal a gag:
"I think the well's empty"
"Then why pump it?"
"There's no blood in this stone!"
~J
Dim Sum
Dec 8 2003, 06:01 AM
Well, I can't see every LS cop outfitted with a SL (v.1 or v.2) as a mandatory requirement - the cost-benefit ratio to do that just suck no matter how you look at it. Any corp (today or tomorrow) looks at what it's going to get back in terms of its investment from their employees and when you view it that way, it's more believable to say that cyber is an optional thing that is highly encouraged but not compulsory. Employees might be encouraged in various ways to go under the knife to have cyber implants (from bonuses to promotions, etc.) but it makes little sense to insist on it, both in financial terms and in productivity.
I do like Siege's argument that in it can do wonders for PR ... "Our officers are trained to the latest standards of law enforcement and equipped with state of the art cyberware to assist them in any hostile situations they encounter. Lone Star holds the year-on-year record for fewest civilian casualties in the resolution of hostile encounters as a result of our commitment to ensuring our officers continue to receive the finest training and equipment ...." but that PR spiel can be limited to certain departments like SWAT or FRT and still do wonders to impress the public and city councils. It does NOT do enough on the PR front to justify implanting EVERY beat cop with a SL.
Frankly, I find the argument that cops would have implanted SLs instead of using external smart goggles because the goggles might end up in the black market and be used against cops very dumb. If that were a concern, LS cops would not be issued with T-bolts!!! Better not give them hi-end encrypted radios, either, 'cos they might fall into the wrong hands and be used against cops later!!!
I get the general impression that most of the advocates for cops having SLs feel they need to give cops some form of equalizer to get players to take them more seriously. Why is that??? Whether today or in the 2060s of SR, a cop is a cop and even a hardened criminal thinks twice (at least!) before they attack one! In SR, exactly because cops can expect hardened runners out there with whiz-tech toys, cyber and magic, they'll adjust their procedures accordingly.
My players know not to underestimate cops even if they know that they could easily take a cop down on a one-on-one situation but if they attack a cop, they'd better be prepared to be Public Enemy No. 1 in the cops' books and priority. In my games, the "ordinary" cop on the street can still deal a healthy dose of coffee (of the wake-up-and-smell-it variety) to PCs - eg. foot patrols don't go out alone, they ALWAYS have a partner. Cops act smart because they are well-trained, especially Lone Star officers - they will take cover, retreat if necessary, try to contain you while they call for back-up, which will arrive in force even if it's just one PC popping off a few rounds from his pistol! You'd better believe SWAT is going to be rolling out if it's more than one PC discharging anything bigger than a pistol!!!
My run-of-the-mill LS street cop has an average Pistols rating of 3-4 with perhaps a specialisation in the T-bolt and both of them will use combat pool (1-2 additional dice if not more, up to 4 usually for the average shmoe) - rolling 6-7 dice with a T-bolt (base damage of 12S) can potentially kill a PC. Depending on the tactical situation, both cops would engage a single perp to take him down where possible/necessary. With just plain laser sights on their T-bolts, I have never needed street cops loaded down with cyber to get my players to respect them.
Even if the players kill the patrol cops, they know the call will have gone out over the commnet unless they had surprise on the patrol and managed to geek both the cops immediately (difficult since my cops aren't dumb enough to stand together or make themselves easy targets) and there'll be an intense hunt for the perps who committed the homicdes. If they get away, they'll have to worry about the investigation that follows - if they killed the cops anywhere in a built-up urban area, they can be pretty sure that their images were captured on some camera and the team's decker would probably not be in time to delete the date from the cops' host before the pictures got circulated to every cop, who'd then circulate it to their informants, who'd then circulate it ... you get the idea.
My point is you don't have to dress up a bog-standard cop to make him a threat to the players.
thunderchild
Dec 8 2003, 08:02 AM
Well you could use the trick many GM's have used, demotions!
Yes, just like in Leathal Weapon 3 when the 2 badass detectives were demoted to patrolman for doing something stupid, If your pc's make a habit of trying to blow LS coppers up simply stick Max the Combat Mage and Barry the Gunbunny SWAT team members in their way, That should make them a bit wary from now on.
or if your not feeling that mean simply have one of them be a mage, and the other holding a Defiance T250 having just gone to question a moderately high risk subject over something, oh and make the guy reasonably well versed in the shotgun.
Dim Sum
Dec 8 2003, 08:56 AM
QUOTE (thunderchild) |
Well you could use the trick many GM's have used, demotions!
Yes, just like in Leathal Weapon 3 when the 2 badass detectives were demoted to patrolman for doing something stupid, If your pc's make a habit of trying to blow LS coppers up simply stick Max the Combat Mage and Barry the Gunbunny SWAT team members in their way, That should make them a bit wary from now on. |
Hahahaha, Thunderchild, good one to use! I've somehow never considered that even though I've surprised PCs with Imperial Guardsmen in regular Stormtrooper armour before ... (under the old GDW system) "Oh, 10 stormtroopers? No, I'll split my Blaster 10D+2 between 7 of them and shoot with 3D+2. I can dodge the rest of them ... <rolls dice> woo-hoo! Yeah! Take that! ... They WHAT?!! Dodged??!!! What the - they're shooting? HOW MANY DICE???!!!!!"
BitBasher
Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM
I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(.
Siege
Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM
QUOTE (BitBasher) |
I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
Tanka
Dec 8 2003, 04:26 PM
Dare I ask?
Siege
Dec 8 2003, 04:30 PM
West End Games -- the company that originally created the Star Wars RPG used what is affectionately referred to as the "d6" system.
The Star Wars license has been passed on to WotC and their damnable d20 system -- which embodies everything I dislike and despise about level-based class systems.
-Siege
Tanka
Dec 8 2003, 04:48 PM
I see. I had no clue SW was anything but WotC, but, then again, I'm also fairly new to the pen and paper scene.
Moon-Hawk
Dec 8 2003, 04:52 PM
True dat!
Of course, as much as we'll all swear up and down that d20 sucks, I bet most of us play at least one d20 game, in addition to SR. I do.
Even though SR's system is infinitely better. hehe
Back so LS. I would say that SL would not be required. Several cop templates, laser sights on the thunderbolts, etc makes me think they wouldn't require it. I would expect a very strong incentive program. Not to mention the testimonials from their friends on the force who DO have the ware. I would think that within the first couple years, many of them would take advantage of the incentive program. I generally assume that around 2/3 have some kind of SL system. If they don't, it's either because they're very new, they're some kind of purist and don't want any cyberware they don't have to have, or they're a veteran and such a fraggin' good shot that they can still outshoot their buddies w/ smartlinks.
As for Jazz, it was developed by LS, for LS. However, it is addictive and destructive, and so I would imagine that official policy forbids it's use. I would also think that said policy is not enforced, and that many cops carry a dose, just in case.
BitBasher
Dec 8 2003, 05:20 PM
I can say that from modern mentality that may not apply to SR there would be a number of lawsuits if LS didn't make SL's manditory. There are people who will sue if a stray bullet hits a relative, on the grounds that the bullet statistically would not have missed had "All reasobable precaution been taken". There have been lawsuits of this nature, and they win a freightening percentage of the time. One decision in the favor of a victim can pay for a thousand smartlinks, without exaggeration.
I'm still not saying that all cops would have one, but that cop may face severe liability without it. I honestly believe that the vast majority of police officers would have that ware installed, especially if it was partially financed or subsidized by the star.
[edit]
And I play NO d20 games. I vote with my wallet. Anyone that doesn't like a system yet pays that company for their products directly or indirectly is part of the damn problem. You keep that *^%*&^%* systemn running.
[/edit]
Siege
Dec 8 2003, 08:24 PM
I do play a d20 game now and again -- but I don't buy the product for it.
Of course, since my GM went off the deep end, it hasn't been an issue lately.
-Siege
Nova
Dec 8 2003, 08:28 PM
QUOTE |
QUOTE | Nova wrote: So borrow a concept from the Roman army. |
This strikes me as a sensible compromise. Additionally, it means that not every cop the PCs encounter will be smartlinked, in case the GM finds that it throws off combat and gives the cops an unfair advantage. Personally, I think the cops should grab every advantage they can (everyone else does!), but that's just me.
|
So reward me with some AV ammo. It's the only way to be fair.
Nova
Nova
Dec 8 2003, 08:47 PM
From the LoneStar sourcebook:
QUOTE |
Among other things, the con-venors recommended mandatory surgery for all Lone Star patrol officers, requiring them to go under the knife for implanted radios and recorders.
> Mandatory implant surgery always starts small with drek like radios. Next year they'll be implanting skillwires. Pretty soon they'll have cops walking around chromed to the eye-balls. > Red
> I want to know where they're getting the money for all this scheduled cyberware and surgery. > Point Five
> I don't know where else to post this, so I'm going to dump it here. Beginning last year (I think), the Star issued a dedicated life-sign monitor, or “medical beacon,” to all its street officers. Everyone got one, from SWAT grunts to meter readers. They wear these things on a special harness that locates the little baby right over the heart, or as close to it as possi-ble. Using skin induction, it monitors the offi-cer's life signs. If these life signs go outside a standard band of tolerance, the beacon sends a radio alert to the nearest Lone Star monitor station – usually the microcomp in a vehicle, but not always. This alert prompts the system to monitor the officer's life signs more closely, and if life signs go critical or termi-nate, the monitor sends an “officer down” code direct to Dispatch. The monitor uses the same tech that DocWagon™ uses in implants for its Super-Platinum customers, but the close-to-the-heart location means an even faster response time. > Dixie
> Odd as it may seem, some officers refuse to wear the monitor even though not wearing it is a firing offense. Stupid, too, if you ask me. These paranoid slots claim that the Star could put a locator circuit in the monitor, and they don't want Big Brother looking over their shoul-ders. > Crosshairs
|
If you look at the LoneStar personnel files, there are a few with cuberware, specifically "Chrome Cop Patrol Officer" and "DED Trooper" but the average beat cop has none.
They should though. IMHO.
As for people getting upset at being forced to get cyberware. If I was a cop on the street and I knew that there were people with cyberware and guns doing illegal things (shadowrunners) and that I might come up against them, I would DEMAND a smartlink (2). And bigger guns. And body armor. And insurance.
Cyberpunk streets are violent, even some may say "ultraviolent"...afaik many shadowrun streets are too.
Nova
PS. Velocity, any news on that AV ammo?
Siege
Dec 8 2003, 08:49 PM
I suppose it depends on how psychotic the SR gangs happen to be -- if you use the gangs from Cyberpunk, all bets are off.
The listed gangs from SR seem to be a bit tamer, IMHO.
-Siege
Kagetenshi
Dec 8 2003, 08:50 PM
Here's some. A Pocket Secretary with a big red X on it gave it to me.
~J
Dim Sum
Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM
QUOTE (Siege) |
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister ....
But I completely agree with the sentiments.
Siege
Dec 9 2003, 03:02 AM
QUOTE (Dim Sum) |
QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow...
I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...

-Siege
Tanka
Dec 9 2003, 03:06 AM
QUOTE (Siege) |
QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow... I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...  -Siege |
Is it possible for both to occur simultaneously?
Siege
Dec 9 2003, 03:11 AM
QUOTE (tanka) |
QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:02 PM) | QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow... I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...  -Siege |
Is it possible for both to occur simultaneously?
|
Sure, fear can factor into arousal, but I draw a distinction between:
a) I'm scared and running for cover, reloading my handgun on the bounce
-or-
b) I'm scared, but damn if I'm not gonna see just how far I can get my hand under your blouse
Subtle difference.

-Siege
moosegod
Dec 9 2003, 03:15 AM
QUOTE (Siege) |
QUOTE (tanka @ Dec 9 2003, 03:06 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:02 PM) | QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow... I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...  -Siege |
Is it possible for both to occur simultaneously?
|
Sure, fear can factor into arousal, but I draw a distinction between: a) I'm scared and running for cover, reloading my handgun on the bounce -or- b) I'm scared, but damn if I'm not gonna see just how far I can get my hand under your blouse Subtle difference.  -Siege |
Just to make the quote box even huger.
Tanka
Dec 9 2003, 03:17 AM
QUOTE (moosegod) |
QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:11 PM) | QUOTE (tanka @ Dec 9 2003, 03:06 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:02 PM) | QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow... I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...  -Siege |
Is it possible for both to occur simultaneously?
|
Sure, fear can factor into arousal, but I draw a distinction between: a) I'm scared and running for cover, reloading my handgun on the bounce -or- b) I'm scared, but damn if I'm not gonna see just how far I can get my hand under your blouse Subtle difference.  -Siege |
Just to make the quote box even huger. |
I win.
Anyway, I'd definately like to say that LS doesn't put much 'ware besides what's listed in the official LS SB for the average cop. Obviously, the higher up you are, the more you've got.
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2003, 03:23 AM
QUOTE (tanka) |
QUOTE (moosegod @ Dec 8 2003, 10:15 PM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:11 PM) | QUOTE (tanka @ Dec 9 2003, 03:06 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 10:02 PM) | QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 02:57 AM) | QUOTE (Siege @ Dec 8 2003, 04:23 PM) | QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 04:14 PM) | I so, SO prefer the original mechanics of SW's RPG to the d20 utter s**t that is being forced down our throats now =(. |
Amen brother, preach on!
-Siege
|
Sister .... But I completely agree with the sentiments. |
Sister? Bit's a girl? Wow...um...wow... I don't know if I'm scared or aroused...  -Siege |
Is it possible for both to occur simultaneously?
|
Sure, fear can factor into arousal, but I draw a distinction between: a) I'm scared and running for cover, reloading my handgun on the bounce -or- b) I'm scared, but damn if I'm not gonna see just how far I can get my hand under your blouse Subtle difference.  -Siege |
Just to make the quote box even huger. |
I win.
Anyway, I'd definately like to say that LS doesn't put much 'ware besides what's listed in the official LS SB for the average cop. Obviously, the higher up you are, the more you've got.
|
I have to agree, though if you climb the administrative ladder rather than the active one you won't get much 'ware.
~J
Dim Sum
Dec 9 2003, 03:36 AM
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 8 2003, 05:20 PM) |
I can say that from modern mentality that may not apply to SR there would be a number of lawsuits if LS didn't make SL's manditory. There are people who will sue if a stray bullet hits a relative, on the grounds that the bullet statistically would not have missed had "All reasobable precaution been taken". There have been lawsuits of this nature, and they win a freightening percentage of the time. One decision in the favor of a victim can pay for a thousand smartlinks, without exaggeration.
I'm still not saying that all cops would have one, but that cop may face severe liability without it. I honestly believe that the vast majority of police officers would have that ware installed, especially if it was partially financed or subsidized by the star. |
I don't disagree with the fact that:
1. Lone Star would face potential lawsuits if stray rounds happened to hit innocent by-standers.
2. cops are at a clear disadvantage if they don't have SLs
when compared to a professional shadowrunner.
What I'm saying, specifically in response to the above, is:
1. SLs are not going to stop stray rounds from happening
much more than the cops using laser sights (based purely on the -1 as compared to a -2 TN modifier). Furthermore, lawsuits against cops reacting with deadly force when innocents are injured or killed are often unsuccessful or barred by operation of law, especially if the use of such force is justifiable and in proportion to the threat presented - I used to be lawyer, I know.

The only qualifier I'd make to the issue of lawsuits is that the law may change a little in future to allow class or joint action suits if some weasel PI attorney sues not on the basis of negligence but on the basis that the cops' performances were not as safe as they could be. That is to say, they were not negligent - they just weren't given the means to be as safe as they possibly could be.
2. the reason why I don't think the average street cop is going to be forced to have a SL implanted is simply because he's not expected to resolve a threat presented by shadowrunner teams - faced with such overwhelming force and placed at a serious disadvantage, the street cop's job would be to try to contain the situation while screaming for SWAT/FRT back-up. Even today, few cops will try to play hero if they're faced with a bunch of ex-soldiers who work expertly as a team and armed with heavy firepower robbing a bank (or on the extreme, if they were faced with ex-special forces trained individuals robbing the bank). They call in SWAT.
But for dealing with street scum, the occasional ganger, a cop and his partner with their trusty T-bolts (or whatever they prefer to pack) with laser sights are enough. If the ganger has friends - LOTS of friends - and they're armed to the teeth, the street cops just call in SWAT/FRT again. The bottomline is, even if the street cop had a SL implant, he still wouldn't try to take on hardened runners or gangers armed with SMGs and outnumber him - his SOP would be to yell for SWAT/FRT who are trained and equipped to diffuse such situations.
I
do acknowledge that once a street cop finds himself in a situation such as the above, I think he would seriously consider having an SL implanted if only to give him some peace of mind with that little extra edge. I play Lone Star as actively/heavily encouraging their officers to take that step to have cyber implants and it offers a subsidised loan program but for all the reasons I've stated, Lone Star still makes it an option rather than a mandatory requirement.
BitBasher
Dec 9 2003, 04:19 AM
[checks my package] Yep I'm a guy!

Bastages!
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2003, 04:27 AM
Dammit, I'd already changed my mental picture of you. Ah well. Maybe it'll wear off in a couple of years.
~J
Fortune
Dec 9 2003, 04:35 AM
QUOTE (BitBasher) |
[checks my package] Yep I'm a guy! |
And here I was thinking maybe you had bashed your bit one too many times.
Dim Sum
Dec 9 2003, 04:42 AM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Dec 9 2003, 03:19 PM) | [checks my package] Yep I'm a guy! |
And here I was thinking maybe you had bashed your bit one too many times.
|
Gawd, Fortune!
Must say I am confused now - I thought Bit is a gal, neh?
Fortune
Dec 9 2003, 04:46 AM
QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 03:42 PM) |
I thought Bit is a gal, neh? |
I think that's pretty obvious from your other post.
toturi
Dec 9 2003, 04:47 AM
QUOTE (Dim Sum) |
I don't disagree with the fact that:
1. Lone Star would face potential lawsuits if stray rounds happened to hit innocent by-standers.
2. cops are at a clear disadvantage if they don't have SLs when compared to a professional shadowrunner.
|
Only if you hit someone with a SIN. The SINless have no legal standing and can't sue.
Dim Sum
Dec 9 2003, 04:49 AM
Hrrrrkkklllding gah blast!!! And all this time, I had an image of a rawkin' kewl chick with the Vegas PD??!! Oh, the pain, the pain!!
Kagetenshi
Dec 9 2003, 04:54 AM
He could always get an operation. They could change his sex and install a Smartlink.
~J
Dim Sum
Dec 9 2003, 05:15 AM
Siege
Dec 9 2003, 06:37 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
He could always get an operation. They could change his sex and install a Smartlink.
~J |
Install a smartlink for his package?
-Siege
there are way too many places you could go with that joke. ...or with that 'ware, for that matter (would a called shot negate your condom?)
most beat cops with the intention of staying in and/or going higher would probably opt for surgery, especially if there were a program in place that made it cheaper to do so--especially since they'd walk out of the clinic with a license for their 'ware.
Zazen
Dec 9 2003, 07:28 AM
QUOTE (mfb) |
there are way too many places you could go with that joke. ...or with that 'ware, for that matter (would a called shot negate your condom?) |
Nah, but it'd keep it out of their eyes when you go for the money shot.
Fortune
Dec 9 2003, 08:20 AM
QUOTE (Zazen) |
Nah, but it'd keep it out of their eyes when you go for the money shot. |
You say that like it's a good thing.
...that's a really disturbing smiley to use at that particular juncture, fortune.
Prospero
Dec 9 2003, 09:32 AM
Would it be better if he'd used a different one?
Digital Heroin
Dec 9 2003, 10:02 AM
QUOTE (Dim Sum @ Dec 9 2003, 05:15 AM) |
Hell, yeah! And if you were to visit at the same time, they could implant a smartass, too!!! |
Scary image of potty shots emerging... little paper targets... Sammie giggling as he burst fires and takes out three...
Siege
Dec 9 2003, 03:25 PM
QUOTE (Prospero) |
Would it be better if he'd used a different one? |
Would that be a better smiley to use?
Not sure how you'd process the medium and long range shots though...
-Siege
Hitomi
Dec 9 2003, 03:47 PM
QUOTE (Dim Sum) |
Hrrrrkkklllding gah blast!!! And all this time, I had an image of a rawkin' kewl chick with the Vegas PD??!! Oh, the pain, the pain!!  |
Now thats funny.
BitBasher
Dec 9 2003, 04:50 PM
Much like finding a live Yak in my living room, I don't know how this conversation got here but I want it to go away
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.