Anywho my problem is this. One of my players in the game I will be starting soon says there are certain things he can't understand about the SR world. Keep in mind, his perspective on D&D and Rogues is that if they were greedy or selfish enough to be rogues they would never go anywhere near traps or dungeons because they are too dangerous.
I will post a conversation we had about his questions. Maybe someone can help me with answers for him Player: Shadowrun is going to be a very difficult place to live through criminal endeavors.
[ Spoiler ]
Player: Shadowrun is going to be a very difficult place to live through criminal endeavors.
me: well it helps to be smart about them
Player: But how would you get paid? Everything is electronic, there's no hard currency anymore. It's
all traceable.
Easily traceable.
me: there are still certified cred sticks
and its not all traceable, well not if you know what you are doing or have people who know what
they are doing
Player: They would still have logged ID tags, like vin numbers. You would need some pretty good fake
IDs, plus the accounts to go with them. Even then there are a dozen red flags that many systems would
encounter.... but then, what is law enforcement like in Shadowrun. I'm using our standards of
security which, despite a few screw-ups and the efforts of highly dedicated, one-way terrorists, is
actually pretty good at what it does.
me: the certified just means they are guaranteed worth a certain amount based on type, not linked to
accounts and no system is perfect, beecause well RL certainly isnt and a game where security is
perfect would be bopring lol
Player: The money has to come from somewhere. That means records. You won't use real information
that can be tracked unless you have no choice or you are on legitimate business.
me: there are ways around it, trust me
Player: Well, for low-level "runs" that wouldn't be a problem. But there isn't really a lot of money
in that sort of thing.
me: and corps have special accounts for shadow ops that are set up to not leave trails much the way
the government does now
Player: Right, like I said. But, the average runner doesn't have access to that sort of thing, but if
he has an account that showing an inflow of money, that means income. In the majority of cases,
income means taxes. Tax records are where they get you.
me: umm most runners are sinless sinless dont get taxed
Player: The reason that I mention all this is because, in the U.S., the black market is a cash only
industry. They don't accept anything that can leave a paper trail.
me: and SR economies dont work that way, atleast not on average I dont think tax fraud really is
handled and actually the black market is often barter. trade for trade
Player: Your assuming that tax laws haven't changed between now and then. Also, don't forget about
property taxes. Even non-citizens have to pay property taxes on the land and buildings they own in
other countries.Ummm, but what about food, water, clothing, cell-phones.... you can't really barter
for everything. If you could, we wouldn't have needed to invent money.
me: we are talking about a world that has extra-territorailty for corporations.
Player: Which would make the mega-corps independant countries. So you use international law as a
basis for communication. Which would make the mega-corps independant countries. So you use
international law as a basis for communication.
me: okay, well just so you know, I'm not going to have a cybered up Eliot Ness come breaking down
your door because you arent paying taxes on your ill gotten gains lol
Player: But... that would be kinda' awesome!
me: im not saying Lone star or whoeever isnt going top nail you, but if they do its because you
screwed up or someone ratted you out or turned on you or whatever
for them to care about your taxes would mean they have a reason to come after you in the first
place and if they have that they will have more important stuff going on
Player: I think the biggest problem I'm having with seeing how this works out is I really don't
understand the present governments that have control of what used to be the U.S.
me: in what way? you mean how pervasive is the governemnent? well governments, I mean
Player: Standards of personal and property rights, import/export regulations, speech rights, rights
to privacy, expected surveillance levels, immigration controls, border policing, standing with their
neighbors, cultural attitudes toward firearms and recreational drugs. You know, the usual. Financial
regulations and business controls should also be on that list.
me: hmm you might post on dumpshock and ask that I'll see if i have any links that might have more
info. when im not busy
Player: Oh, and level of corruption in law enforcement. That's the one I was forgetting.
me: ah. as corrupt as it is in any corporation. all law enforcement is by corp now
Player: That's problematic.
me: lone star is a private corporation hired by the government to do policing. yep depends on the
country though. In aztlan, aztech private security do the cop gig basically
Seattle also has the metroplex guard
Player: Hmmm... depending upon the level of collusion to competition this could make things a lot
easier, or it could make life a hell for a runner.
me: depends on the area, who's asking and waht its for its all subjective
Player: Well, that's the way it works now, but at the present law enforcement is a government owned
monopoly. We're talking about private organizations and all the efficiency that can bring.
me: not all corps want to cooperate with the star, take ares, they are trying to win over the
policing job for seattle away from Lone star for their own cop company "Knight Errant" so they will
take every chance to make Lone Star look ussuless especially if said runners were working for them
Player: Yeah, but at the same time Lone Star should be trying to make themselves out to be the best
in law enforcement since Moses came down from the mount. Which means they'll be spending more and
making security tighter. It would be even better if they could catch some Knight Errant runners,
'cause then they'd have dirt on them that would drive them fromt the bidding war.
me: yes, but it would be the parent corp hiring them as deniable assets. agan its a "covering your
ass" kinda thing, no trails and all that
Johnsons would have their own hackers doing away with any electronic trails
Player: Which brings me back to the question: Who thought it was a good idea to give megacorps
extr-territorial standing?
me: the supreme court if I remember right. it had to do with corporations having the right to defend
their own. the corporate court is in place to keep the corps playing nioce now, of course
basically think of it this way, the corps arent the governments because they don't want to be, the
government has to deal with sewage and stuff like that. corps only have to take care of (somewhat)
the people that work for them, and provide them services
Player: ? That's just crazy talk. Modern corporations have had the legal right to use armed guards
to protect their property for decades. They wouldn't need any extra recognition to acquire what they
already have.
me: i cant really go into the whole thing
if you read the beginging of the main book it should give you enough of an idea
you have 3rd edition dont you?
Player: No, haven't had for a while.
me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowrun_timeline
here's the timeline it might help some the info is all right near the beginning
Player: Yeah, but it's been written by people that don't seem to understand that these rights have
been in place since the days of piracy. Companies have always had the right to defend their property.
They didn't need extra-territoriality to do it. International law already allowed for this. The only
groups that they were defenseless against were search and seizure by legitimate governments.
me: but this deals with actually killing people
Player: Like I said before.
me: 2001: The Shiawase Decision
* The Shiawase court decision establishes extraterritoriality for megacorps when a radical eco-group
called TerraFirst! attacked a Shiawase nuclear power plant. Though the attack was repelled, the
corporation used the incident to convince the Supreme Court that major multinational corporations
need the ability to protect themselves. To this end, the Supreme Court granted major companies
extraterritoriality. (TerraFirst! manages later to acquire evidence that the attack was in fact a
setup with the intent to force the courts into granting sovereignty. However, before the group can
act on said information, their headquarters is destroyed and key members killed in what is considered
to be one of the first shadowruns.)
Player: But they already had legitimate right to defend, with lethal force if need be, themselves
and their property. The govts. handed them complete autonomy for nothing.
me: but they wanted more than what they had
thats kinda the point
Player: But why were the govts. stupid enough to agree to giving private citizines that level of
autonomy? What convinced them to give up that much power?
me: they were in trouble there were alot of things going on at the time and they were stretched thin
diseases, natural disasters the truckers strike mentioned
the idea is the governments were weak and ineffectual
and most offcials were owned by corporations, much like today
Player: Okay, let's say that you have a gun, and I have a gun. Let's say that I'm an evil bastard
that will try to take everything for myself if I could, and you know it. So I come up to you and tell
you that someone is attacking me and I need the means to defend myself. So, you hand me your gun?
me: but you cant always think of it in those simple terms
but yes with the right set up it could make sense
actually had that happen to me in a game once the thing the other guy didnt know is aI had a spoare
on my back
Player: Your right, it's not that simple. The U.S. should have used military transports to get food
into New York, and everywhere else it was needed while the truckers were on strike. Then there would
have been a horrendous number of reprisals made against the organizers of the strike, etc.
me: seriously, start a thread on dumpshock and ask these question, im sure there are plenty of
people who have been in it for years and have thought about this alot who could answer your questions
better than I can
Player: But your the one that is going to GM this, so your answers are the ones I need.
me: tell you what I will think about it and get back to you
me: well it helps to be smart about them
Player: But how would you get paid? Everything is electronic, there's no hard currency anymore. It's
all traceable.
Easily traceable.
me: there are still certified cred sticks
and its not all traceable, well not if you know what you are doing or have people who know what
they are doing
Player: They would still have logged ID tags, like vin numbers. You would need some pretty good fake
IDs, plus the accounts to go with them. Even then there are a dozen red flags that many systems would
encounter.... but then, what is law enforcement like in Shadowrun. I'm using our standards of
security which, despite a few screw-ups and the efforts of highly dedicated, one-way terrorists, is
actually pretty good at what it does.
me: the certified just means they are guaranteed worth a certain amount based on type, not linked to
accounts and no system is perfect, beecause well RL certainly isnt and a game where security is
perfect would be bopring lol
Player: The money has to come from somewhere. That means records. You won't use real information
that can be tracked unless you have no choice or you are on legitimate business.
me: there are ways around it, trust me
Player: Well, for low-level "runs" that wouldn't be a problem. But there isn't really a lot of money
in that sort of thing.
me: and corps have special accounts for shadow ops that are set up to not leave trails much the way
the government does now
Player: Right, like I said. But, the average runner doesn't have access to that sort of thing, but if
he has an account that showing an inflow of money, that means income. In the majority of cases,
income means taxes. Tax records are where they get you.
me: umm most runners are sinless sinless dont get taxed
Player: The reason that I mention all this is because, in the U.S., the black market is a cash only
industry. They don't accept anything that can leave a paper trail.
me: and SR economies dont work that way, atleast not on average I dont think tax fraud really is
handled and actually the black market is often barter. trade for trade
Player: Your assuming that tax laws haven't changed between now and then. Also, don't forget about
property taxes. Even non-citizens have to pay property taxes on the land and buildings they own in
other countries.Ummm, but what about food, water, clothing, cell-phones.... you can't really barter
for everything. If you could, we wouldn't have needed to invent money.
me: we are talking about a world that has extra-territorailty for corporations.
Player: Which would make the mega-corps independant countries. So you use international law as a
basis for communication. Which would make the mega-corps independant countries. So you use
international law as a basis for communication.
me: okay, well just so you know, I'm not going to have a cybered up Eliot Ness come breaking down
your door because you arent paying taxes on your ill gotten gains lol
Player: But... that would be kinda' awesome!
me: im not saying Lone star or whoeever isnt going top nail you, but if they do its because you
screwed up or someone ratted you out or turned on you or whatever
for them to care about your taxes would mean they have a reason to come after you in the first
place and if they have that they will have more important stuff going on
Player: I think the biggest problem I'm having with seeing how this works out is I really don't
understand the present governments that have control of what used to be the U.S.
me: in what way? you mean how pervasive is the governemnent? well governments, I mean
Player: Standards of personal and property rights, import/export regulations, speech rights, rights
to privacy, expected surveillance levels, immigration controls, border policing, standing with their
neighbors, cultural attitudes toward firearms and recreational drugs. You know, the usual. Financial
regulations and business controls should also be on that list.
me: hmm you might post on dumpshock and ask that I'll see if i have any links that might have more
info. when im not busy
Player: Oh, and level of corruption in law enforcement. That's the one I was forgetting.
me: ah. as corrupt as it is in any corporation. all law enforcement is by corp now
Player: That's problematic.
me: lone star is a private corporation hired by the government to do policing. yep depends on the
country though. In aztlan, aztech private security do the cop gig basically
Seattle also has the metroplex guard
Player: Hmmm... depending upon the level of collusion to competition this could make things a lot
easier, or it could make life a hell for a runner.
me: depends on the area, who's asking and waht its for its all subjective
Player: Well, that's the way it works now, but at the present law enforcement is a government owned
monopoly. We're talking about private organizations and all the efficiency that can bring.
me: not all corps want to cooperate with the star, take ares, they are trying to win over the
policing job for seattle away from Lone star for their own cop company "Knight Errant" so they will
take every chance to make Lone Star look ussuless especially if said runners were working for them
Player: Yeah, but at the same time Lone Star should be trying to make themselves out to be the best
in law enforcement since Moses came down from the mount. Which means they'll be spending more and
making security tighter. It would be even better if they could catch some Knight Errant runners,
'cause then they'd have dirt on them that would drive them fromt the bidding war.
me: yes, but it would be the parent corp hiring them as deniable assets. agan its a "covering your
ass" kinda thing, no trails and all that
Johnsons would have their own hackers doing away with any electronic trails
Player: Which brings me back to the question: Who thought it was a good idea to give megacorps
extr-territorial standing?
me: the supreme court if I remember right. it had to do with corporations having the right to defend
their own. the corporate court is in place to keep the corps playing nioce now, of course
basically think of it this way, the corps arent the governments because they don't want to be, the
government has to deal with sewage and stuff like that. corps only have to take care of (somewhat)
the people that work for them, and provide them services
Player: ? That's just crazy talk. Modern corporations have had the legal right to use armed guards
to protect their property for decades. They wouldn't need any extra recognition to acquire what they
already have.
me: i cant really go into the whole thing
if you read the beginging of the main book it should give you enough of an idea
you have 3rd edition dont you?
Player: No, haven't had for a while.
me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowrun_timeline
here's the timeline it might help some the info is all right near the beginning
Player: Yeah, but it's been written by people that don't seem to understand that these rights have
been in place since the days of piracy. Companies have always had the right to defend their property.
They didn't need extra-territoriality to do it. International law already allowed for this. The only
groups that they were defenseless against were search and seizure by legitimate governments.
me: but this deals with actually killing people
Player: Like I said before.
me: 2001: The Shiawase Decision
* The Shiawase court decision establishes extraterritoriality for megacorps when a radical eco-group
called TerraFirst! attacked a Shiawase nuclear power plant. Though the attack was repelled, the
corporation used the incident to convince the Supreme Court that major multinational corporations
need the ability to protect themselves. To this end, the Supreme Court granted major companies
extraterritoriality. (TerraFirst! manages later to acquire evidence that the attack was in fact a
setup with the intent to force the courts into granting sovereignty. However, before the group can
act on said information, their headquarters is destroyed and key members killed in what is considered
to be one of the first shadowruns.)
Player: But they already had legitimate right to defend, with lethal force if need be, themselves
and their property. The govts. handed them complete autonomy for nothing.
me: but they wanted more than what they had
thats kinda the point
Player: But why were the govts. stupid enough to agree to giving private citizines that level of
autonomy? What convinced them to give up that much power?
me: they were in trouble there were alot of things going on at the time and they were stretched thin
diseases, natural disasters the truckers strike mentioned
the idea is the governments were weak and ineffectual
and most offcials were owned by corporations, much like today
Player: Okay, let's say that you have a gun, and I have a gun. Let's say that I'm an evil bastard
that will try to take everything for myself if I could, and you know it. So I come up to you and tell
you that someone is attacking me and I need the means to defend myself. So, you hand me your gun?
me: but you cant always think of it in those simple terms
but yes with the right set up it could make sense
actually had that happen to me in a game once the thing the other guy didnt know is aI had a spoare
on my back
Player: Your right, it's not that simple. The U.S. should have used military transports to get food
into New York, and everywhere else it was needed while the truckers were on strike. Then there would
have been a horrendous number of reprisals made against the organizers of the strike, etc.
me: seriously, start a thread on dumpshock and ask these question, im sure there are plenty of
people who have been in it for years and have thought about this alot who could answer your questions
better than I can
Player: But your the one that is going to GM this, so your answers are the ones I need.
me: tell you what I will think about it and get back to you