JAG
Dec 16 2003, 04:47 PM
Have any GMs out there had any requests to work out the Gun-Kata/Gun-Fu style from Equilibrium?
If so how did you do it.
Tanka
Dec 16 2003, 04:49 PM
I was told to watch that. My friend said the protagonist would make an excellent idea for an SR character.
Grey
Dec 16 2003, 04:49 PM
There have been
several threads about this in the past. Do a search on the forum for Equilibrium. Also check the
older forums too, there was stuff there.
Grey
Dec 16 2003, 04:50 PM
A lot of people here have mixed feeling about the movie. Personally, I think it was great.
JAG
Dec 16 2003, 04:52 PM
I did a search and it came back with nothing on the subject on these forums.
Hence why I posted it
As for the other forums , thanks for the tip but it just links back to these ones

QUOTE |
A lot of people here have mixed feeling about the movie. Personally, I think it was great.
|
Me too
Grey
Dec 16 2003, 05:10 PM
Crap, I did the link from memory, hang on and I'll fix it.
Grey
Dec 16 2003, 05:11 PM
Fixed
Kage2020
Dec 16 2003, 05:20 PM
And, incidentally, the idea of the 'gun kata' has as much a basis in reality as the chambara movies do with more normal martial arts... Erm, which I guess is to say that it does actually exist, just not in the way that it is represented in Equilibrium. And, yes, I've brought up the topic before since I think it makes a more interesting approach to Adepts than the normal overt melee focus...
Kage
Austere Emancipator
Dec 16 2003, 05:24 PM
Raygun
Dec 16 2003, 05:52 PM
It takes a pretty huge stretch of the imagination to even suggest that any fighting style that exists in reality is in any way similar to the Gun Kata from Equilibrium. There are plenty of close range fighting techniques that are intended to be used with gun drawn. All of them are defensive in nature and most are intended to put some distance between you and your attacker so that A) you don't have to fight them for possession of the gun, B) you don't injure yourself with the gun, C) you don't injure any non-combatants or friendlies around you, and D) the likelyhood of an effective hit is increased.
The whole concept of Gun Kata is movie fiction. I seriously doubt that anything even approaching it will ever be taken seriously in reality. It just isn't safe, much less feasible. But it sure does look cool.
Ol' Scratch
Dec 16 2003, 05:57 PM
Yes, and as we all know, Shadowrun is
anything but fiction.
Austere Emancipator
Dec 16 2003, 05:59 PM
Yes, and as we all know, Raygun wasn't answering to:
QUOTE (Kage2020) |
And, incidentally, the idea of the 'gun kata' has as much a basis in reality as the chambara movies do with more normal martial arts... Erm, which I guess is to say that it does actually exist, just not in the way that it is represented in Equilibrium. |
Raygun
Dec 16 2003, 06:00 PM
Kage 2020 suggested that something like Gun Kata exists in reality. It doesn't. That's all I'm saying. You can play the game any way you want.
Kage2020
Dec 16 2003, 06:03 PM
QUOTE (Raygun) |
It takes a pretty huge stretch of the imagination to even suggest that any fighting style that exists in reality is in any way similar to the Gun Kata from Equilibrium.., |
You will note that in terms of 'realism' I likened
Equilibrium to the
chambara/Hong Kong-type martial arts movies...
That does not change the fact that one individual - I forget the name - has specifically developed fighting techniques geared towards the defense and offense with guns... Must... try... to remember the darned name!
Kage
Ol' Scratch
Dec 16 2003, 06:10 PM
QUOTE (Austere Emancipator @ Dec 16 2003, 11:59 AM) |
Yes, and as we all know, Raygun wasn't answering to:QUOTE (Kage2020) | And, incidentally, the idea of the 'gun kata' has as much a basis in reality as the chambara movies do with more normal martial arts... Erm, which I guess is to say that it does actually exist, just not in the way that it is represented in Equilibrium. |
|
You mean in response to the first sentence where Kage says it's about as realistic as another made-up movie martial art, or the second sentence where he said that it doesn't exist like it does in the movie but it
does exist as a form of entertainment/exercise if nothing else?

Edit: Oops, looks like Kage himself responded before I could find the link.
krishcane
Dec 16 2003, 06:15 PM
What somehow was missed in the gun kata concept is that people fighting hand-to-hand don't use kata either. They might use lessons learned from kata, but they are not going to try to replicate one of their kata during a fight. Except under the most fantastic coincidence, the kata is not going to be perfectly appropriate to their situation. Anyone trying to do their kata is going to lose quickly as soon as the situation diverges from the example that the kata illustrates.
So there could be gun-kata, sure-- there are stable-range-shooting techniques, point-shooting techniques, and even wounded-return-fire techniques. String a few together for a hypothetical situation, and you've got a gun kata. You still wouldn't kick in a door, go through the kata blindly, and expect to actually hit anyone -- anymore than you would get into a fist fight, close you eyes, execute your kata, and expect to open your eyes to a room full of unconscious foes.
Though I liked the movie, I think Equilibrium smoked from the same kata crack pipe that Karate Kid did when Mr. Miyagi says, "Done correctly, there is no defense against the crane technique."
--K
Edits: Thanks for the gun-kata link. That's funny. The picture on the main page, of the guy in the white suit in a double-pistol kung fu pose amuses me because if he pulls the trigger of the gun in his right hand, he's going to get a hot shell casing up his nose on in his right eye, not to mention temporarily defeaning himself from the noise. I hope for his sake it's not loaded.
Raygun
Dec 16 2003, 06:15 PM
QUOTE (Kage2020) |
You will note that in terms of 'realism' I likened Equilibrium to the chambara/Hong Kong-type martial arts movies... |
Unfortunately, I didn't know what chambara was and that kept me from inferring to it as a stylization of real martial arts. That's why I had to refer to your "Erm, which I guess is to say that it does actually exist, just not in the way that it is represented in Equilibrium" statement, which seems like a pretty far grasp to me.
QUOTE |
That does not change the fact that one individual - I forget the name - has specifically developed fighting techniques geared towards the defense and offense with guns... Must... try... to remember the darned name! |
Like I said, there are several real close range firearm techniques. You're probably thinking of Col. Rex Applegate's
Point Shooting technique, which dismisses the use of sighted fire on particularly close range targets. It's nothing like the stylized Gun Kata.
QUOTE (From the gunkatta.com FAQ:) |
Is [Gun Kata] real? Unfortunately, no. The kata is real, that is what this site strives to teach, the movements of gunkata. It is pretty to watch, and fun to do. It may have some real-life applications, but we may never really get to know that.
I accidently shot myself in the foot, what should I do? Stop trying to do gunkata with real guns moron. If you were using a paintball handgun, it's still going to hurt like a bitch though. Be Careful.
So like, who is the man behind this site? I'm glad you asked. I'm Dan Ferro, 23, from Maryland. I am an aspiring actor myself, and work as a web designer. I have been breakdancing for 5 years now, and do a lot of free-hand art.
[Disclaimer at the bottom of the page] Please don't try any of this with real guns. That would be dangerous and stupid. Remember, it's just a movie. You cannot dodge bullets in real life. The owner of this site in no way encourages or endorses use of real hand guns in practising gunkata. |
Tanka
Dec 16 2003, 06:22 PM
All katas do is suggest a way you should move in a fight, not tell you how to fight. I can go through katas and work on the flow of everything, but if I try to use said kata in a fight for anything but flow, I'm going to get my ass handed to me.
"Gunfu" is the same way. Guns aren't about looking pretty. Anybody who thinks otherwise isn't going to last long in gang territory.
Austere Emancipator
Dec 16 2003, 06:32 PM
QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein) |
You mean in response to the first sentence where Kage says it's about as realistic as another made-up movie martial art, or the second sentence where he said that it doesn't exist like it does in the movie but it does exist as a form of entertainment/exercise if nothing else? |
How about them both? Fortunately, your first reply did not in any way refer to whether gun kata exists IRL and in what form, but only to Raygun's "The whole concept of Gun Kata is movie fiction." and the way you (weirdly) interpreted this to mean that Shadowrun can't be (movie) fiction. Probably due to the fact that you wish to argue with Raygun about anything you can, since your views of the preferred level of fiction are so different. (This wannabe-analysis from a bit over a year of similar very short messages full of eye-rolling that are obviously meant to be aggravating that pop up in quite a few threads Raygun has posted in.)
Cain
Dec 16 2003, 09:51 PM
QUOTE |
Though I liked the movie, I think Equilibrium smoked from the same kata crack pipe that Karate Kid did when Mr. Miyagi says, "Done correctly, there is no defense against the crane technique."
|
Technically he's correct; done with exacting correctness, every technique is unstoppable. Of course, that rather depends on your opponent doing exactly the wrong thing, your technique being unhumanly perfect, lighting/ground conditions being optimal, you being in perfect shape, and a bajillion other factors that aren't bloody likely to occur together in the real world.
Dende
Dec 16 2003, 10:54 PM
Acutally he isn't. No technique is unstopable. All of them have at least one flaw that can be exploited or a counter technique, or something that can be used to prevent that technique working in the first place.
Kage2020
Dec 16 2003, 11:15 PM
QUOTE (Raygun) |
...Unfortunately, I didn't know what chambara was...
...You're probably thinking of Col. Rex Applegate's
...It's nothing like the stylized Gun Kata. |
First point: Chambara defines the style of martial arts movies where while there is a basis in reality (i.e. real fighting styles) the application is often represented as superhuman or supernatural. This is generally used in reference to the 'Hong Kong kung fu' movies such as, say, Iron Monkey. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is also technically chambara, though upper class.
Thus, again, I was merely pointing out that it was about as plausible as any of those films (to which many RPGs allude to) but was based around a core of truth. That was all... Wasn't quite expecting it to get toasty.
Second point: That's possible, though that name doesn't quite ring a bell at the moment. It would have come up in conversation ages ago and, to be honest, while I practice various martial arts they do not dominate my waking life. Ooh. Not suggesting that is the case with anyone else, just using that as a bit of a 'get out clause'... I'll have to go and have a chat with the person I remember mentioning it, if I can find them. But thanks for the URL. I shall check it out.
Third point: Again, yes I know. That was the point in the chambara reference which is about as much to real life martial arts (though sometimes that can scarily 'supernatural' in itself) as Equilibrium was to the use of firearms in martial arts. Wasn't quite expecting people to jump on the use of "kata" as the suggestion that people would use them in a real life combat situation...
However, compared to that one also has to remember that kata - poomsae, whatever - are representative of formalised combat as much as the swifter pre-arranged sparring types employed by many traditional martial arts. It is not 'just' moves randomly placed together.
Bringing this back to Shadowrun, then depending on the individual style and preference of the GM it is an entirely plausible martial art form. My god, they've got cyber-fighting styles, why not the evolution of this? Yes, a bit hokey but SR is science-fantasy after all... But for those who like a bit of versimilitude then it is interesting to note that it is based in reality.
Kage
Siege
Dec 16 2003, 11:22 PM
Arguably you could learn a form of melee involving guns as weapons:
1. This is how you block a swing with your gun.
2. This is how you snap the barrel forward as a strike
3. This is how you use the gun as a blunt object to strike soft, squishy parts
As for martial techniques that improve your ability to fire the gun...probably not.
Although modern day shooting schools would probably come closest to what you're thinking of, Thunder Ranch, for example.
The Israelies teach a form of "gun-fu" -- trick or tactical shooting. For example, kicking back in a chair and in the same motion knocking a table up as concealment while drawing your weapon. If you believe non-confirmed sources.
-Siege
Zazen
Dec 16 2003, 11:26 PM
I just want to chime in here and say that Equilibrium was a lame movie with only slightly cool fight scenes. They're not worth the hours of lame dialogue and unbelievable nonsense. I rented it once based entirely on forum-hype from around here and now my girlfriend and I use it as a synonym for crap.
Just my opinion. If you're one of those people who often feel cheated by bad movies, stay away.
Herald of Verjigorm
Dec 16 2003, 11:29 PM
QUOTE (Zazen) |
They're not worth the hours of lame dialogue and unbelievable nonsense. |
DVD (borrowed) and chapter advance button.
Tanka
Dec 16 2003, 11:32 PM
QUOTE (Dende) |
Acutally he isn't. No technique is unstopable. All of them have at least one flaw that can be exploited or a counter technique, or something that can be used to prevent that technique working in the first place. |
If you'd read the rest of what he said, then what you're saying is what he's saying.
If all things are at the optimum, you are at your best, your opponent is at their worst, etc, etc., then this technique is unstoppable. If you are at your best and your opponent is at their worst, then any technique you use is unstoppable.
BumsofTacoma
Dec 17 2003, 12:17 AM
Herlad I was wondering how many clicks it took to get to the center of a smart ass.
spoiler... hehehehe
edit: oh yeah the subject.
So whats the argument here? Its proven there are froms of MA, or whatever using guns. If not only for entertainment, but not using sights yadda yadda yadda.
So now what are you argueing about? Its place in shadowrun?
Herald of Verjigorm
Dec 17 2003, 12:52 AM
It was a great half hour. I later watched the story to gain the "why" aspect, but I wouldn't pay money for it. Drug induced mock utopias are common in sci-fi.
zenpoetsix
Dec 17 2003, 01:00 AM
can i ask a quick question? it might be slightly off topic.
if a physad with astral sight throws a thermal smoke grenade into a small group of guards and switches to his astral sight, what would be his modifies to shoot at the guards???
i have a physad in my group that plays a gun-kata character and he did that last game. does astral sight penetrate smoke? would the modify only be +2? it's not like he's shooting blind into the smoke, he can "see" them with astral sight.
thanks in advance for any feedback.
Tanka
Dec 17 2003, 01:03 AM
If you mean "Astral Perception," then he has the +2 TN for percieving and doing something else.
But, yes, he'll be able to see them because he'll be able to see their auras.
Raygun
Dec 17 2003, 03:45 AM
QUOTE (Kage2020) |
First point: Chambara defines the style of martial arts movies where while there is a basis in reality (i.e. real fighting styles) the application is often represented as superhuman or supernatural. This is generally used in reference to the 'Hong Kong kung fu' movies such as, say, Iron Monkey. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon is also technically chambara, though upper class.
Thus, again, I was merely pointing out that it was about as plausible as any of those films (to which many RPGs allude to) but was based around a core of truth. That was all... Wasn't quite expecting it to get toasty. |
I guess the reason why my language was a little strong was because I've heard this conversation about Gun Kata a few times in the past. I just wanted to nip it in the bud, from the point of view of a realistic, effective fighting technique. It's the whole shooting at things you literally can't see that bothers me. That totally defies every bit of firearm discipline I've ever been taught.
The reason why I perhaps went too far was because I don't even like the idea of Gun Kata being eluded to as even slightly real, as people could very easily hurt themselves in the process of finding that out. Not that I have to worry too much about that in this particular forum. Just erring on the side of caution, I guess.
QUOTE |
That's possible, though that name doesn't quite ring a bell at the moment. It would have come up in conversation ages ago and, to be honest, while I practice various martial arts they do not dominate my waking life. Ooh. Not suggesting that is the case with anyone else, just using that as a bit of a 'get out clause'... I'll have to go and have a chat with the person I remember mentioning it, if I can find them. But thanks for the URL. I shall check it out. |
No prob. I'd be interested in hearing about it. The Point Shooting technique is only one of probably a couple of dozen respected close combat techniques, but it is by far the most popular real technique that could be compared to Gun Kata, as body positioning is very important in its use, thus, something akin to a basic kata is used to teach it. You do, however, need to have visual points of reference between you, the gun and the target, unlike the way Gun Kata is portrayed in the movie.
QUOTE |
Bringing this back to Shadowrun, then depending on the individual style and preference of the GM it is an entirely plausible martial art form. My god, they've got cyber-fighting styles, why not the evolution of this? Yes, a bit hokey but SR is science-fantasy after all... |
I don't disagree at all with its portrayal and use in Shadowrun. Personal opinions aside, I fully understand that people might want to make a game that includes this kind of fighting style. In fact, Funk has (as linked above by Aus). More power to you. All I'm saying is that Gun Kata isn't real and is extremely unlikely to ever be because it is unsafe in several ways and defies basic principles of gun handling. That's all.
Herald of Verjigorm
Dec 17 2003, 04:00 AM
QUOTE (Raygun) |
It's the whole shooting at things you literally can't see that bothers me. |
In the scene you are probably referring to, he stood there listening for a while as the targets tried to decide if he was still alive. With some practice, you can determine the source of a sound very accurately and only suffer the +8(+4 if you pay the price) blindfire penalty.
How much skill it takes to reliably hit something that you only can detect with your secondary sense can be decided in SR by the rules and a probability chart.
Kage2020
Dec 17 2003, 04:06 AM
QUOTE (Raygun) |
I guess the reason why my language was a little strong was because I've heard this conversation about Gun Kata a few times in the past. |
I've always found it amazing how many of the more interesting discussions have generated out of a bit of misunderstanding at the first... On the bright side I feel that it means much kudos to the director of Equilibrium. He hit just the right nerve with many people that he inspired them! The downside is, as you later say, it involves guns. Actually, 'violence' would be, perhaps, more apt but there we go...
QUOTE (Raygun) |
I just wanted to nip it in the bud, from the point of view of a realistic, effective fighting technique. |
I must at this point add the cinematic equivalent of dry ice here... the use of 'effective' and 'fighting technique' is so tied up in personal opinion, individual ability and context that it becomes difficult to separate the various features out.
QUOTE (Raygun) |
It's the whole shooting at things you literally can't see that bothers me. That totally defies every bit of firearm discipline I've ever been taught. |
I've never fired a significant - inasmuch as the term is appropriate - firearm, so I'm not entirely sure of the etiquette involved here. In the context of the explanatory logic of the film I would imagine that 'saturation fire' would be a key term? Perhaps?
QUOTE (Raygun) |
The reason why I perhaps went too far was because I don't even like the idea of Gun Kata being eluded to as even slightly real, as people could very easily hurt themselves in the process of finding that out. Not that I have to worry too much about that in this particular forum. Just erring on the side of caution, I guess. |
Ah, that is fair enough. I'm reminded of an advanced self-defence class which concentrated on knife defence. A class where only 'black belts' (

) were taught relevant self defences. Only permanent markers were used and the smiles of satisfaction at appropriately performed techniques were widespread on the day in question. But so too were the grimaces when people realised how much ink they'd actually got on them...
QUOTE (Raygun) |
No prob. I'd be interested in hearing about it. |
If it is actually a different individual, I'll let you know. If it's the same person I'll let you know! I'm just intrigued, ultimately.
QUOTE (Raygun) |
...as body positioning is very important in its use, thus, something akin to a basic kata is used to teach it. |
Another intriguing point... That URL calls...

QUOTE (Raygun) |
You do, however, need to have visual points of reference between you, the gun and the target, unlike the way Gun Kata is portrayed in the movie. |
In many ways the flaw in the representation in the film is the 'cool' feature. The idea that rather specific techniques can cover numerous environmental situations. I'm sure that even a gross analysis of, say, FBI case files would show the inherent weakness of this...
...But as a 'cool' bit of imagery that inspires interesting RPG. Well, we get the point
QUOTE (Raygun) |
More power to you. All I'm saying is that Gun Kata isn't real and is extremely unlikely to ever be because it is unsafe in several ways and defies basic principles of gun handling. That's all. |
Oh, definitely. Not much more to say there... Well, other than shadowrunners like many 'adventurers' have that wonderful positon of 'suspension of disbelief' which allows the to do this kind of combat...
Kage
Zazen
Dec 17 2003, 09:20 AM
QUOTE (zenpoetsix) |
if a physad with astral sight throws a thermal smoke grenade into a small group of guards and switches to his astral sight, what would be his modifies to shoot at the guards??? |
As tanka said, it's +2 for using astral perception to perform a nonmagical activity. However, the smoke is also slightly visible on the astral plane (but not as obstructive as on the physical plane), imposing only +1 for "light smoke" or +2 for "thick smoke". A list of astral perception visibility modifiers is in MITS around page 80 or so, if I remember correctly.
So his TN's would be at +3 or +4, depending on how you classify the smoke. I'd call the smoke from a grenade "thick smoke" and thus assign +4.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.