Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Full-Auto Fire
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
ARCANE
We are looking at starting up a new 4th Ed game and have run a little one off with pregens to explore the rules. The main issue we had was with Full auto fire. I have had a good look and have not found anyone else discussing this, so I thought I would bring it up.

The assumption we are working on (tell me if I am wrong) is that mounted weapons do not suffer from recoil. And even if they did, a gyromounted MG with a gas vent 3 would still be enough to give the same effect. The +9 DV seems to make full auto weapons scarier than Panther assualt cannons! I guess the one mitigating factor would be that you compare the base DV versus the armor to work out if it's stun or lethal?

Just to check my math on this - an assault rifle 7P -1 AP, with explosive rounds (+1DV) with fully compensated recoil is doing 17P! Unless you are shooting at people in security armor (not exactly common equipment) you should be levels of damage far in excess of that little assault cannon.

As a little aside the errata for shotguns seems a little odd - the Alpha's shotgun did not get it's AP fixed (an oversight I would assume), and I think the AP for other shotguns should have been fixed to follow the fletchette formula properly. So the standard shotguns (7P -1AP) should have the value of 9P(f) +4AV for fletchette. The Alpha should have the regular +5AP.

On the subject of the Alpha, where do the options go? Does the entire gun convert into the options listed, are they all underslung or some combo? My assumption would be the shotgun is underslung, but the gun converts into LMG or Sniper form. But what is up with the carbine? You can convert it into a less powerful version? You have an less powerful version underslung? Is it just to make it easier to hide in carbine form? Weird.

Thanks in advance smile.gif
hahnsoo
The Ares Alpha has an underbarrel Grenade Launcher (it says so right in the description), and can't be converted into other weapons. Do you actually mean the HK XM30 package (which also has an underbarrel grenade launcher, in the description)? I think they mean the underbarrel Grenade Launcher can be converted into a Shotgun, while the base weapon can be converted into a carbine, Sniper Rifle, or LMG.

As far as full auto, yes it is deadly. But you are talking about hitting a single target with a 10 bullet narrow burst. They still get their normal dodge roll, which is no more easier/harder to dodge than a single shot. If you are using a wide burst to negate their dodge roll, you don't get the DV adjustment. Also, Autofire DV bonuses don't apply when hitting hardened armor (vehicles, spirits with immunity to normal weapons). Finally, the Panther XXL Cannon gets -5 AP on its normal hits, which is quite nice.

The real question is why does the PJSS Elephant Gun exist? A Sport Rifle, legal to carry with a permit, that can hit as hard as an Assault Cannon?

EDIT: The only reason I can see to make the HK XM30 into a Carbine is concealability. An Assault Rifle is a +6 Concealability, while a Carbine is +4 (as SMG). Not important to some folks, but there ya go. The fluff implies that you keep these modules in a suitcase or something similar, and you convert them in a non-combat situation. It really doesn't make a lot of sense to use the package, but you might have a character who is a gun nut who would have much glee over a gun that transforms into other guns. Most players who would play that kind of character, though, are also gun nuts and would rather have MORE guns over a gun that transforms into other guns. nyahnyah.gif
Johnny Hammersticks
I often wonder why people don't use Riggers more, or talk about how awesome they are.

vehicle+LMG+hardpoint=full auto awesome
Kovu Muphasa
QUOTE (hahnsoo @ Jan 18 2010, 08:16 PM) *
The real question is why does the PJSS Elephant Gun exist? A Sport Rifle, legal to carry with a permit, that can hit as hard as an Assault Cannon?

For Hunting Graboids, Trolls and Light Armored Vehicles. wink.gif
kanislatrans
and because critters in the 6th world are scarier than they are now. If Im hunting Piasma, I want the biggest hardest hitting rifle I can get. Now for juggernauts, its best to move up to anti vehicle missles. kinda expensive to hunt(but they sure taste good coming off the barbeque!(grin)
Karoline
They don't rule the world because no one has realized how awesome they are yet, and so aren't appreciated properly. The other reason is walking around with an army of LMG toting drones will get you noticed.
ARCANE
QUOTE (hahnsoo @ Jan 19 2010, 01:16 PM) *
The Ares Alpha has an underbarrel Grenade Launcher (it says so right in the description), and can't be converted into other weapons. Do you actually mean the HK XM30 package (which also has an underbarrel grenade launcher, in the description)? I think they mean the underbarrel Grenade Launcher can be converted into a Shotgun, while the base weapon can be converted into a carbine, Sniper Rifle, or LMG.

As far as full auto, yes it is deadly. But you are talking about hitting a single target with a 10 bullet narrow burst. They still get their normal dodge roll, which is no more easier/harder to dodge than a single shot. If you are using a wide burst to negate their dodge roll, you don't get the DV adjustment. Also, Autofire DV bonuses don't apply when hitting hardened armor (vehicles, spirits with immunity to normal weapons). Finally, the Panther XXL Cannon gets -5 AP on its normal hits, which is quite nice.

The real question is why does the PJSS Elephant Gun exist? A Sport Rifle, legal to carry with a permit, that can hit as hard as an Assault Cannon?

EDIT: The only reason I can see to make the HK XM30 into a Carbine is concealability. An Assault Rifle is a +6 Concealability, while a Carbine is +4 (as SMG). Not important to some folks, but there ya go. The fluff implies that you keep these modules in a suitcase or something similar, and you convert them in a non-combat situation. It really doesn't make a lot of sense to use the package, but you might have a character who is a gun nut who would have much glee over a gun that transforms into other guns. Most players who would play that kind of character, though, are also gun nuts and would rather have MORE guns over a gun that transforms into other guns. nyahnyah.gif



Thank you, yes that was my bad, I should have checked I do get those two (Alpha and HK XM30) mixed up, dunno maybe I just like the name better? wink.gif

Ok so it is as we assumed, full auto wise. It seems a bit much for full auto weapons. A single shot weapon does have the option to take up to a -4 penalty to hit to increase the DV bringing the modified damage more in line, if not a bit harder to hit with.

We are considering doing something along the lines of (for narrow bursts, leaving wide bursts as is): Full auto narrow bursts are treated as 3 short narrow bursts. This allows for more damage to be done in one action than just taking 2 short bursts.

Basically what we are trying to avoid is the fact that an average sprawl ganger(body 3) in an armor vest(AV 6) being afraid of the drone with the Ingram Smartgun X loaded with explosive ammo, than he is of the same drone mounting an Assualt cannon. Math being he has equal chance of dodging both, so with a basic hit he can either look at soaking a 16P with 8 dice (taking 13-14 levels of damage) or a 11P with 4 dice (maybe 10 levels of damage, could even survive a hit the lucky dog, but unlikely. Even with an armor jacket he wont be looking pretty, 16S on 10 dice should still drop him, even if not lethally. That assault cannon would also be looking at less damage with a much better chance of leaving the ganger standing (just) and able to return fire (inaccurately).

Still I guess thats our beef, and it's good that we cleared it up biggrin.gif
Squinky
QUOTE (Johnny Hammersticks @ Jan 18 2010, 07:48 PM) *
I often wonder why people don't use Riggers more, or talk about how awesome they are.

vehicle+LMG+hardpoint=full auto awesome


In my group it went like this:

(Back in 3rd edition)
One player made a rigger, bought the essence heavy cyber and all
couple others made totally beefed up combat characters and were just dying for some action.

Combat starts, initiative is rolled, bunch of hover drones blow the hell out of everything smile.gif

It kinda bummed us out, but those were earlier days, less real runs.

Nowadays my GM wouldn't let a rigger run around with all that firepower all the time.



Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Karoline @ Jan 18 2010, 07:08 PM) *
They don't rule the world because no one has realized how awesome they are yet, and so aren't appreciated properly. The other reason is walking around with an army of LMG toting drones will get you noticed.



This is a very big reason... all that forepower is illegal to own/use by non-authorized personnel (generally Military or Corpsec)... hope you have good reasons to be mounting all of that illegal, non-licenseable hardware...

Keep the Faith
Saint Sithney
QUOTE (hahnsoo @ Jan 18 2010, 04:16 PM) *
The real question is why does the PJSS Elephant Gun exist? A Sport Rifle, legal to carry with a permit, that can hit as hard as an Assault Cannon?


Why? I'll tell you why! (that's a completely legal weapon in 48 states, btw.)

As to why anyone would want an assault cannon when you can get the same kind of damage out of an assault rifle, well there's range for one, and there's Full Auto mods for second.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jan 18 2010, 08:09 PM) *
Why? I'll tell you why! (that's a completely legal weapon in the USA, btw.)

As to why anyone would want an assault cannon when you can get the same kind of damage out of an assault rifle, well there's range for one, and there's Full Auto mods for second.


Full Auto on an Assault Cannon... No Thank You...

Keep the Faith
Squinky
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jan 18 2010, 11:09 PM) *
Why? I'll tell you why! (that's a completely legal weapon in the USA, btw.)

As to why anyone would want an assault cannon when you can get the same kind of damage out of an assault rifle, well there's range for one, and there's Full Auto mods for second.


I know by RAW you can do it, but something in me stops me everytime I think of making a full auto assualt cannon smile.gif

It just seems.....Cheesy smile.gif

Also, Assault cannon ammo is crazy expensive anyway.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Squinky @ Jan 18 2010, 08:13 PM) *
I know by RAW you can do it, but something in me stops me everytime I think of making a full auto assualt cannon smile.gif

It just seems.....Cheesy smile.gif

Also, Assault cannon ammo is crazy expensive anyway.



Assault Cannon Ammo... Way to expensive to shoot in FA Mode...

Keep the Faith
Karoline
Isn't there also something about the fire rate mod not being able to be used on weapons with 'unusual' ammo? While an assault cannon doesn't fire completely foreign ammo, the bullets it fires can hardly be described as 'usual'.
Squinky
QUOTE (Karoline @ Jan 18 2010, 11:19 PM) *
Isn't there also something about the fire rate mod not being able to be used on weapons with 'unusual' ammo? While an assault cannon doesn't fire completely foreign ammo, the bullets it fires can hardly be described as 'usual'.


Yeah, it does. But what is unusual ammo? Up to the GM I guess.

I don't want full auto grenade launchers ( I know, they make em) and other stuff in my games, its just gets to nuts smile.gif
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Karoline @ Jan 18 2010, 08:19 PM) *
Isn't there also something about the fire rate mod not being able to be used on weapons with 'unusual' ammo? While an assault cannon doesn't fire completely foreign ammo, the bullets it fires can hardly be described as 'usual'.



Thias would be true depending upon your definition of Unusual Ammunition... I would not classify them as unusual, but rather very large...

They are what I would consider a standard round...

But I would still never mod a Panther Assault Cannon for such Use... If I wanted something like that, I would choose either a Vigilant Light Autocannon, or a More Discrete Stoner-Ares M107 HMG Conversion to Minigun...

Much more useful in my opinion if you are wanting a Fully Automatic Weapon with Ooomph... and they tend to strain credibility a lot less for me...

Keep the Faith
HappyDaze
QUOTE
I often wonder why people don't use Riggers more, or talk about how awesome they are.

Because the vehicle rules - especially the chase rules - are some of the worst-written shit in SR.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (HappyDaze @ Jan 18 2010, 08:46 PM) *
Because the vehicle rules - especially the chase rules - are some of the worst-written shit in SR.



I hear this all the Time, but have never experiencced the hangups that most portray about the system...

Keep the Faith
wind_in_the_stones
QUOTE (ARCANE @ Jan 18 2010, 07:55 PM) *
The assumption we are working on (tell me if I am wrong) is that mounted weapons do not suffer from recoil. And even if they did, a gyromounted MG with a gas vent 3 would still be enough to give the same effect. The +9 DV seems to make full auto weapons scarier than Panther assault cannons! I guess the one mitigating factor would be that you compare the base DV versus the armor to work out if it's stun or lethal?


QUOTE (Arsenal, p105)
VEHICLE WEAPONS AND RECOIL
Theoretically, vehicle weapons mounted in a weapon mount
(p. 146) do not suffer negative recoil modifiers, but this can lead
to strange results when a very large gun is mounted on a very small
vehicle. For example it is possible to install a weapon mount with
an LMG onto a small drone with a body rating of 2 (cat-sized) and
suffering no recoil effects from full-auto fire, where a normal human
would have trouble holding the weapon let alone successfully hitting
anything. In instances like this, it is perfectly all right for the gamemaster
to apply negative modifiers equal to those a person shooting
the weapon would suffer from recoil, counting in the vehicle’s mass
(as a rule of thumb: its Body rating) as recoil compensation.


And no, to determine stun versus physical, you compare the modified DV of the attack to the modified armor value. That's base damage (not including burst fire) plus net hits, versus the armor rating with AP applied. Note that non-living things (vehicles) don't take stun damage, so if your modified DV doesn't exceed the modified armor value, there is no damage.
wind_in_the_stones
QUOTE (HappyDaze @ Jan 18 2010, 11:46 PM) *
Because the vehicle rules - especially the chase rules - are some of the worst-written shit in SR.


1. Your group may ignore said vehicle rules, and still shoot shit up.

2. Or adapt some wargaming rules for your vehicles. Car Wars is always fun. I hear Air Cav has great rules for helicopter combat, if you can find it. Personally, I'm not a big fan of wargaming. Except Car Wars.
Tanegar
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jan 18 2010, 10:09 PM) *
Why? I'll tell you why! (that's a completely legal weapon in 48 states, btw.)

Holy fucking asscrackers! What are people hunting that they need a .95-cal rifle? Cthulhu? That's not a kill-it-in-one-shot gun, that's a kill-the-target-and-everything-behind-it-to-a-distance-of-two-miles gun.
kanislatrans
QUOTE (Tanegar @ Jan 18 2010, 10:57 PM) *
Holy fucking asscrackers! What are people hunting that they need a .95-cal rifle? Cthulhu? That's not a kill-it-in-one-shot gun, that's a kill-the-target-and-everything-behind-it-to-a-distance-of-two-miles gun.


we grow some mighty big groundhogs here in Pennsylvania...(grin)
Kovu Muphasa
QUOTE (Tanegar @ Jan 18 2010, 10:57 PM) *
Holy fucking asscrackers! What are people hunting that they need a .95-cal rifle? Cthulhu? That's not a kill-it-in-one-shot gun, that's a kill-the-target-and-everything-behind-it-to-a-distance-of-two-miles gun.

You want scary
Search Word: Beowulf Rifle
Its a .50 M-4 Carbine
Draco18s
QUOTE (kanislatrans @ Jan 18 2010, 11:42 PM) *
we grow some mighty big groundhogs here in Pennsylvania...(grin)


Some of them play the lottery!
BlackHat
QUOTE (ARCANE @ Jan 18 2010, 06:55 PM) *
I guess the one mitigating factor would be that you compare the base DV versus the armor to work out if it's stun or lethal?


Just to check my interpretation of the rules, but don't you compare the modified DV (after net hits, full-auto, ammo-type, etc) to the armor? (SR4A pg 160?)
forgarn
QUOTE (kanislatrans @ Jan 18 2010, 11:42 PM) *
we grow some mighty big groundhogs here in Pennsylvania...(grin)


Yeah they do. Grew up in York and went to college in Mansfield. Hit a couple of those big sucker on the way to and from home a couple of times. Almost as bad a hitting a deer (without the car body damage).
Malachi
QUOTE (BlackHat @ Jan 19 2010, 11:04 AM) *
Just to check my interpretation of the rules, but don't you compare the modified DV (after net hits, full-auto, ammo-type, etc) to the armor? (SR4A pg 160?)

Yes, but the "modified" DV doesn't include the bonus DV from burst or full-auto fire. See "Compare Armor" p. 149 and the key is on page 153:
QUOTE
Narrow Bursts
Narrow bursts cause more damage to the target. Increase the attack’s DV by +2. Note that
this DV modifier does not apply when comparing the DV to the armor rating.
BlackHat
Ah, that would be the part I was missing. smile.gif Thanks for clearing that up.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Kovu Muphasa @ Jan 18 2010, 09:44 PM) *
You want scary
Search Word: Beowulf Rifle
Its a .50 M-4 Carbine



Bet that it does not weigh in at 86 pounds like the linked one does though... hell I have fired .50 cal handguns, so a M4 Variant is not that big of a deal really...

Keep the Faith
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (BlackHat @ Jan 19 2010, 10:04 AM) *
Just to check my interpretation of the rules, but don't you compare the modified DV (after net hits, full-auto, ammo-type, etc) to the armor? (SR4A pg 160?)



For Burst/Full auto fire that would be a no...

You must check the modified DV (Sans BF/FA Narrow Burst Modifiers) to compare against Armor, after which you add the modifier for BF/FA and apply the damage based upon the initial comparison

Keep the Faith

EDIT... Looks like someone already posted that though...
Kovu Muphasa
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 19 2010, 07:27 PM) *
Bet that it does not weigh in at 86 pounds like the linked one does though... hell I have fired .50 cal handguns, so a M4 Variant is not that big of a deal really...

Keep the Faith

Here is a link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.50_Beowulf
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Kovu Muphasa @ Jan 19 2010, 07:16 PM) *



AS I was saying, it does not look like it weighs 86 pounds like the .95 cal rilfe linked above does (according to the link)... can't say for sure though, as there are no weight statistics provided on the site you linked...

Hell, even the 2-Bore rifle (which is 1.025 Caliber) only weighs in at 26 pounds... and it has a greater Energy Profile (Muzzle Energy of almost 15,000 ft/lbs.) than the .50 Beowulf you linked as well... Unfortunately, the 2-Bore is strictly Custom Manufactured by Hand for a very hefty price I would imagine...

Keep the Faith
Saint Sithney
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jan 19 2010, 06:47 PM) *
AS I was saying, it does not look like it weighs 86 pounds like the .95 cal rilfe linked above does (according to the link)... can't say for sure though, as there are no weight statistics provided on the site you linked...


It's hard to tell from the picture on account of the lack of reference, but each of those bullets is about the size of a can of redbull.
It's a total novelty, range-only piece.

Honestly, I'd have made that sucker a bazooka-style recoilless rifle. That would be fun as hell to shoot.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jan 19 2010, 08:52 PM) *
It's hard to tell from the picture on account of the lack of reference, but each of those bullets is about the size of a can of redbull.
It's a total novelty, range-only piece.

Honestly, I'd have made that sucker a bazooka-style recoilless rifle. That would be fun as hell to shoot.


Did not see pictures of the Rounds for the .95... but a 2-Bore round is 4.5 Inches long, 1.025 Inches in Diameter and has a 3500 Grain Bullet inside the casing... and as I said earlier... the 2-Bore is 60 pounds lighter, with a bigger round, and greater energy produced, and is made for actual hunting... What is not to like... (other than the price of course)

Keep the Faith
Kovu Muphasa
Personly I like the Ares Alpha on a Drone

These are my stats for it in my SyFy Modern Game
CODE
.50 Beowulf
Damage: 7P
AP: -3
Mode: SA/BF/FA
RC: [1]
Ammo: 10c/20c
Availability: 20r
Cost: 1,750


Now this is a Weapon that would be great on a Drone
Neowulf
QUOTE (kanislatrans @ Jan 18 2010, 09:42 PM) *
we grow some mighty big groundhogs here in Pennsylvania...(grin)

Buffalo here in wyoming, which are elephants vaguely disguised as cows.
Sengir
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jan 20 2010, 04:52 AM) *
Honestly, I'd have made that sucker a bazooka-style recoilless rifle. That would be fun as hell to shoot.

Your wish has been answered: http://guns.wikia.com/wiki/Rucni_Top_-_20
Rotbart van Dainig
QUOTE (ARCANE @ Jan 19 2010, 01:55 AM) *
The assumption we are working on (tell me if I am wrong) is that mounted weapons do not suffer from recoil.

You are indeed correct, however Arsenal suggest the GM should change that to RC equal to Body. Which, aside from Drones, means the same thing.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012