QUOTE (Dr. Funkenstein @ Apr 1 2010, 08:13 PM)

Tolkien never ridiculed or spat upon Shadowrun. Of course, he wasn't exactly alive when the game was released, but that's neither here nor there. Here's one of Gibson's quotes from 2003:
I'm not exactly sure why anyone would need his permission for daring to include common cyberpunk elements into their works considering, you know, he didn't even coin the word "cyberpunk" and has even admitted in other quotes that people have as much of a rate to be angry at him for "stealing" from them. But apparently they do. Especially if they want to include elves.
Anyway, yeah... Insult the hell out of him. He's well deserving of it, the pompous ass.
It's fine to dislike the guy, don't get me wrong. I'm sure he's as arrogant a prick as any other author with a name as recognizable as his -- even if they're not pretentious before selling a lot of copies, it sure seems to do the trick once they get popular -- and I'm not a big fan of his
attitude either. I think it's silly for him to imply anyone needed his permission for anything, and I think it's unfortunate he never, apparently, even gave Shadowrun a once-over to see if he liked it.
But there's a difference between disliking him as a person and acting like he wasn't
in any way an influential or talented writer. I can dislike George Clooney's politics but still appreciate that he's a wildly popular actor, for instance. Hating on Gibson is one thing, but hating on him and pretending he wasn't important to cyberpunk as a genre (and as such Shadowrun, which grew out of that, at least initially) is just kind of silly.