Schaeffer
Sep 19 2006, 12:23 PM
<sigh> Katie, bar the door....
Angelone
Sep 19 2006, 02:28 PM
| QUOTE (krayola red) |
| Just out of curiosity, do you guys with military/LE experience consider a knife or a bottle of OC pepper spray to be a more effective self defense tool, both in trained and untrained hands? |
No, I personally don't. The main thing about self defense is being able to think clearly, and not just lock up. You can have the best self defense tool ever and can be trained in how to use, but if you aren't mentally prepared to use it, you might as well not have anything.
Am I being clear here? It's hard this early.
eidolon
Sep 19 2006, 03:46 PM
I think krayola red means "of the two", not as they compare to another weapon/system.
The Grifter
Sep 19 2006, 03:49 PM
Gotta agree with Angelone here. Unless you know how to use a knife or OC spray, you're just as likely to get it taken away from you and get stabbed/shot with your own weapon.
And even if you ARE trained, there are so many variables to take into account.
Kagetenshi
Sep 19 2006, 03:53 PM
Right, but the question is mostly meaningless. In untrained hands I'd probably say the spray, due to dual concerns of probably being more willing to use it (though this cuts both ways) and having slightly less ugly potential if the opponent gains control of it, but ultimately I'd say if you haven't trained you have no business carrying a weapon.
Note that I don't have military/LE experience.
~J
Critias
Sep 19 2006, 04:15 PM
If the other guy's unarmed and also untrained, you don't really need training with a knife to be dangerous with it, just a willingness to get your hands dirty. And your forearms. And most of the rest of you.
Most people don't have that mindset. I carry a knife everywhere, but as a tool much much more than as a weapon. I suppose if it came down to it, in an emergency it would occur to me to put the pointy end inside someone as fast as I can, and to repeat until insertion was no longer necessary. Whether I could or not, to be quite honest, I think has little to do with the physicality of the act, and everything to do with my state of mind at the time. To protect my wife, undoubtedly. To protect myself? My stuff? A stranger? I really don't know.
Either way, as much as I wouldn't mind formal training on how to use a knife as a weapon, I'd go for some hand-to-hand stuff first. And before that, more pistol work.
All that's just kind of an aside -- as to the actual question, I'd say pepper spray is a better bet for an untrained person interested in self defense. Both would be ideal (one for less-than-lethal situations, one for extremely up close and in your face crises), but if it came down to one or the other, I think the pepper spray would be the way to go. Everyone knows how to squirt something in the right general direction, it would let you irritate someone without having to get terribly close, and it's going to be easier to justify in court than fileting someone.
That said, look into very specific brands/types before you buy. The stuff comes in a hojillion different varieties nowadays, everything from an actual squirt-style spray (just like a water gun) to an aerosol style for a mist/fog (hard to miss with, capable of giving a facefull to multiple attackers, but horrible for you if the wind's blowing the wrong way), and IIRC even a foam-texture style (which will only affect who you hit with it, no getting a face-full yourself 'cause of a breeze and a gel (which is similar to the foam, has pretty good range, and single-targets, plus it sticks).
So there's a variety of 'em available, depending on what you have in mind, and your own willingness to maybe end up with a face full, yourself. And, btw, that might not be a bad idea (especially if you get a fogger/mister type, and might end up with some in an actual emergency) -- cops and military guys in most instances are required to get sprayed with this stuff before they can carry it, and it makes sense. You want an idea of what you're gonna do to someone if you spray 'em (so you can get a feel for what they can and can't still accomplish, under it's effects), and you want to show yourself that you can live through it (so you don't get a whiff in a fight, lock up, and get killed as a result of panic, shock, etc). Don't go huffing it or anything, but spraying a little into the air on a windy day, then walking into it a little (in a controlled situation, with a friend or two nearby) might not be a horrible idea.
Whether you plan on a self-test or not (and, especially if you have asthma, the self-test might NOT be a good idea, but then carrying it might not be too bright, either) -- do find somewhere safe, and open, and outdoors, and ventilated, and fire it a few times. Learn what sort of range and accuracy you can expect, get a feel for where you press to make it shoot, etc, etc. Just because it's not a gun or a knife doesn't mean you shouldn't practice with it -- it's still a weapon, and weapons are at their most dangerous (to all involved) in unskilled hands. Use a paper plate as a target (draw an angry smiley on it if you want), and see how that foam shoots, or soak it in a stream, or see how close you'll need to be to spray/mist it. Practice with your weapon, whatever it might be.
Oh, and last bit of advice, check the Scoville Heat Unit of whatever brand you're considering. 1.5-2 million is the "default" for police-grade stuff (iirc, 2 mill is the highest allowed). Higher the better (nastier). If whatever you're thinking of buying doesn't mention the SHU, buy something else -- it's like a car manufacturer not telling you the miles per gallon, or something.
Shrike30
Sep 19 2006, 06:34 PM
If someone was asking me "I want to carry something I'll train for an hour with once every few years," I'd send them towards the spray and try to drive home the point that the goal is to get the fuck outta Dodge, not to mess up whoever you just used it on. Essentially untrained people should not be carrying lethal weapons, in my opinion.
If someone was asking me who had a serious interest in self defense and was going to put in training time, I'd tell 'em to carry both. Options, options, options...
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 07:26 PM
| QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
| but ultimately I'd say if you haven't trained you have no business carrying a weapon. |
Bullshit. As long as you understand when you should use the weapon (eg. your life is in danger and running away is not an option), there's absolutely no reason why an untrained person shouldn't carry one. Contrary to popular opinion, it's pretty damn fucking hard to take someone's weapon away when they're trying to kill you with it - being afraid to carry a knife just 'cause your assailant might seize it from you is just silly. If he's so much better trained and he wants to do serious bodily harm or kill you, which is the only situation when you should bring the knife into play, you're pretty much screwed anyway.
To the original question: pepper spray, IMO, is a better weapon for the untrained because it's less of a precision tool than the knife. For the trained, I would say carry both. Or better yet, get yourself a gun.
Kagetenshi
Sep 19 2006, 07:46 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| Contrary to popular opinion, it's pretty damn fucking hard to take someone's weapon away when they're trying to kill you with it |
"Take away", somewhat difficult. "Control", not difficult at all. As for understanding when to use a weapon, that isn't something that magically springs into being.
~J
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 07:58 PM
| QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
| "Take away", somewhat difficult. "Control", not difficult at all. |
For people with equal levels of combat experience? Yes, it is difficult, at least to do so in a consistent and reliable manner. Not to mention that having your weapon controlled isn't nearly as bad as having it taken away and used on you, and stands as a drawback for lack of training rather than using a weapon.
| QUOTE |
| As for understanding when to use a weapon, that isn't something that magically springs into being. |
Common sense helps. Taking out your knife for a schoolyard scuffle is just plain stupid.
eidolon
Sep 19 2006, 08:09 PM
Or, you could just go
here and have this discussion all over again.
KarmaInferno
Sep 19 2006, 08:30 PM
No training at all?
Hmm.
How about that Taser Jacket that was posted a little while ago?
http://www.no-contact.com/
-karma
Kagetenshi
Sep 19 2006, 08:39 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| For people with equal levels of combat experience? |
Ok, that was something I wasn't assuming—it is true that there are people out there with no real experience who will nevertheless generate a situation where weapons are used, but particularly in the case of lethal weapons I don't consider it unreasonable to assume that the opponent has basic knowledge of what they're doing—and when comparing someone with a basic idea of what they're doing to someone without any idea, it becomes quite easy for the former to control the latter's weapon—which ranges from best-case scenario (preventing the latter from using the weapon) to bad-case (causing the latter injury with the weapon) to worst-case (outright wresting away control of the weapon).
If you have no training, and get in a fight with someone who has any meaningful training at all—not necessarily formal—your weapon is just one more way to get yourself hurt.
| QUOTE |
| Taking out your knife for a schoolyard scuffle is just plain stupid. |
Obvious, yes. Taking out your knife for a bar fight? Taking out your knife when someone is robbing you? Taking out your knife in $SITUATION?
Common sense is bullshit. The decision of when to use force (especially lethal force) is not obvious in most cases for someone who hasn't thought about the question a fair bit. Most people who do think about it don't do it spontaneously.
~J
hyzmarca
Sep 19 2006, 09:02 PM
| QUOTE (Shrike30) |
| Any idea what the rating on that stuff is?
|
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 09:21 PM
| QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
| If you have no training, and get in a fight with someone who has any meaningful training at all—not necessarily formal—your weapon is just one more way to get yourself hurt. |
If you're facing someone like that and they have both the desire and the means to kill you, you're a goner anyway. Having a knife would skew the odds slightly in your favor.
| QUOTE |
| Obvious, yes. Taking out your knife for a bar fight? Taking out your knife when someone is robbing you? Taking out your knife in $SITUATION? |
Do you have reason to believe your life is in danger in any of those situations? Is it possible to run away rather than engage the attacker? If the answer is yes to the first and no to the second, then it's time to take out your knife.
| QUOTE |
| The decision of when to use force (especially lethal force) is not obvious in most cases for someone who hasn't thought about the question a fair bit. Most people who do think about it don't do it spontaneously. |
If you're going to pack a weapon without even giving any thought to the kinds of situations when you're going to use it, then you shouldn't pack it at all. Thinking, however, is not training, at least not in the most widely used sense of the word. Confusing the two is not only incorrect, but dangerous.
Kagetenshi
Sep 19 2006, 09:53 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates @ Sep 19 2006, 04:21 PM) |
If you're facing someone like that and they have both the desire and the means to kill you, you're a goner anyway. Having a knife would skew the odds slightly in your favor.
[…]
Do you have reason to believe your life is in danger in any of those situations? Is it possible to run away rather than engage the attacker? If the answer is yes to the first and no to the second, then it's time to take out your knife. |
Again, none of this is obvious. You don't get a little view inside the other person's head that tells you what they mean to do, how capable of doing it they are, any of that. Those look like common-sense questions, but getting a meaningful answer for them (both of them!) is hard.
| QUOTE |
| If you're going to pack a weapon without even giving any thought to the kinds of situations when you're going to use it, then you shouldn't pack it at all. Thinking, however, is not training, at least not in the most widely used sense of the word. Confusing the two is not only incorrect, but dangerous. |
You don't get to think about in advance, except in extremely general terms. What you get to do is make the decision when it's happening, and the only way to ensure being able to consider the situation rationally at the time is to train. "Thinking" does jack shit.
~J
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 10:01 PM
| QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
| Again, none of this is obvious. You don't get a little view inside the other person's head that tells you what they mean to do, how capable of doing it they are, any of that. Those look like common-sense questions, but getting a meaningful answer for them (both of them!) is hard. |
If you don't trust your own judgement, then what can you trust? In a worst-case scenario, don't take out your weapon until they come at you with theirs. Unless you're a complete idiot, you're going know that someone coming at you with a knife of their own is trying to kill you.
| QUOTE |
You don't get to think about in advance, except in extremely general terms. What you get to do is make the decision when it's happening, and the only way to ensure being able to consider the situation rationally at the time is to train. "Thinking" does jack shit. |
Nice use of abstract and meaningless rhetoric. Thinking does jack shit? You obviously haven't done it. Training teaches you how to use the weapon. Thinking teaches you when you should apply that knowledge.
Kagetenshi
Sep 19 2006, 10:33 PM
Can I get an outside opinion? Am I really making this little sense?
~J
SL James
Sep 19 2006, 10:38 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| QUOTE | | As for understanding when to use a weapon, that isn't something that magically springs into being. |
Common sense helps. Taking out your knife for a schoolyard scuffle is just plain stupid.
|
There's an old saying that is particularly apt here: Common sense, isn't.
Shrike30
Sep 19 2006, 10:38 PM
| QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Sep 19 2006, 02:02 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shrike30 @ Sep 18 2006, 01:27 PM) | | Any idea what the rating on that stuff is? |
|
I am so there...
lollerskates: A lot of training revolves around the decision-making process that I believe you're referring to as "thinking." Scenario-based defensive training would be a good example of this... participants are placed into scenarios where there may or may not be a threat of some degree. It's pretty important to have gotten a lot of the "thinking" out of the way ahead of time, to the point where the processes are automatic. One of the things that this will do is let you know that a schoolyard scuffle is likely not a reasonable place to pull a knife, whereas going into the situation having not developed these thought patterns ahead of time and then trying to "think" when the pressure is on can lead to some pretty poor decision-making.
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 10:39 PM
Just to clarify, I'm not in any way whatsoever against the idea of weapons training - in fact, I think that it would be foolish not to train with your weapon of choice if you have the means to do so. There are drawbacks to carrying an unfamiliar weapon that haven't been mentioned here, such as the possibility of fumbling your draw, thereby giving your opponent an even larger window to make his attack. That doesn't, however, mean that untrained people shouldn't carry weapons, because on the whole, it's still an advantage to do so, provided that one simple philosophy is followed: if you have a lethal weapon, don't use it to escalate the level of violence from non-lethal to lethal. If you don't have good reason to believe that your life is threatened, don't draw it, both for practical (more important) and legal (less important) purposes.
SL James
Sep 19 2006, 10:41 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| Thinking does jack shit? You obviously haven't done it. Training teaches you how to use the weapon. Thinking teaches you when you should apply that knowledge. |
I was always taught that is it training that teaches you when you should apply X knowledge. Abstract thought is, like Kage said, utterly devoid of meaning.
Shrike30
Sep 19 2006, 10:41 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| That doesn't, however, mean that untrained people shouldn't carry weapons, because on the whole, it's still an advantage to do so, provided that one simple philosophy is followed: if you have a lethal weapon, don't use it to escalate the level of violence from non-lethal to lethal. If you don't have good reason to believe that your life is threatened, don't draw it, both for practical (more important) and legal (less important) purposes. |
One of my concerns with truly untrained people is that they rarely seem to have thought things out far enough to have even those basic guidelines in place. All of the people I know who DO have those kinds of guidelines in place have also got some kind of training.
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 10:47 PM
| QUOTE (Shrike30) |
| lollerskates: A lot of training revolves around the decision-making process that I believe you're referring to as "thinking." Scenario-based defensive training would be a good example of this... participants are placed into scenarios where there may or may not be a threat of some degree. It's pretty important to have gotten a lot of the "thinking" out of the way ahead of time, to the point where the processes are automatic. |
Point. Maybe I'm drawing too much of a line between the two, because good dojos do incorporate philosophy and scenario-based training into their programs. These places are too few and far in between, IMO. Nevertheless, just flat out saying that if you've never trained with a weapon that you shouldn't carry one is far too restrictive, especially in the case of pepper spray, which doesn't require much formal instruction to use effectively.
I mentioned earlier that if you're going to carry, you need to know when you should use what you're carrying. This knowledge can be gleaned from formal training. It can also be arrived at through other means.
| QUOTE (SL James) |
| There's an old saying that is particularly apt here: Common sense, isn't. |
Some people shouldn't carry regardless of how much training they've had.
lollerskates
Sep 19 2006, 10:53 PM
| QUOTE (SL James) |
| Abstract thought is, like Kage said, utterly devoid of meaning. |
One way that abstract thought is useful is that it teaches you your limits. It's all fine and dandy to have a teacher tell you exactly when you should and should not use your knife, but if you simply cannot bring yourself to kill even in a situation when it's warranted, you need to realize this before you actually get yourself into that situation. There are some things that an instructor can teach you, and some that you have to learn yourself.
Shrike30
Sep 19 2006, 11:37 PM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| QUOTE (SL James) | | There's an old saying that is particularly apt here: Common sense, isn't. |
Some people shouldn't carry regardless of how much training they've had.
|
I'll give you that.
SL James
Sep 20 2006, 12:11 AM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| QUOTE (SL James) | | Abstract thought is, like Kage said, utterly devoid of meaning. |
One way that abstract thought is useful is that it teaches you your limits.
|
Sure. It teaches you have abstract your thinking can be before it turns into lunacy.
Wounded Ronin
Sep 20 2006, 12:21 AM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| QUOTE (Kagetenshi) | | but ultimately I'd say if you haven't trained you have no business carrying a weapon. |
Bullshit. As long as you understand when you should use the weapon (eg. your life is in danger and running away is not an option), there's absolutely no reason why an untrained person shouldn't carry one. Contrary to popular opinion, it's pretty damn fucking hard to take someone's weapon away when they're trying to kill you with it - being afraid to carry a knife just 'cause your assailant might seize it from you is just silly. If he's so much better trained and he wants to do serious bodily harm or kill you, which is the only situation when you should bring the knife into play, you're pretty much screwed anyway.
To the original question: pepper spray, IMO, is a better weapon for the untrained because it's less of a precision tool than the knife. For the trained, I would say carry both. Or better yet, get yourself a gun.
|
There used to be a video hosted on bullshido.net where for some reason a group of people grabbed this woman and were forcing her to fight with this other woman who really hated her. The victim eventually pulled a knife but because she was too timid to use it they just took it away from her and it made them even more aggressive towards her.
So, honestly, I wouldn't carry a knife unless I knew for sure that I'd be able to whip it out and, without a second thought, slash someone in the deadliest way possible. That's my opinion formed in part by this video clip of halfassed knife brandishing effectively backfiring.
Squinky
Sep 20 2006, 12:38 AM
To go back a good bit, when I was trained on OC they sprayed me right in the face, full on. They had us attack them, then hosed us hardcore. They had talked about how some people were immune to pepper spray, and for a split second I thought I might be.
Then they got me in the eyes....That didnt feel very good. Immediately after they had some training exercises for us to go through with OC in our eyes. I had to go kick a bag a bunch, whack a bit with a baton, stuff like that. And after the first few seconds, I was able to fight, and I was SUPER pissed.
So, if you want to carry OC, realize that after you spray it, you need to either get out of there or take control of the person immediately. Otherwise, a good deal of people will just fight harder. Some will give up, but in my experience, most people that are the type of person to initiate an attack on a person have done it before, and are more conditioned than the less violent person.
But I personally wouldn't ever carry a knife, mostly because I think any court will rule differently on a self defense case involving knives. Stabbing someone is considered barabaric to most people, shooting someone seems more acceptable. In the public eye, thats what counts.
lollerskates
Sep 20 2006, 01:44 AM
| QUOTE (SL James) |
| QUOTE (lollerskates @ Sep 19 2006, 04:53 PM) | | QUOTE (SL James) | | Abstract thought is, like Kage said, utterly devoid of meaning. |
One way that abstract thought is useful is that it teaches you your limits.
|
Sure. It teaches you have abstract your thinking can be before it turns into lunacy.
|
I have no idea what that even means. Then again, why am I not surprised?
lollerskates
Sep 20 2006, 01:50 AM
| QUOTE (Wounded Ronin) |
| There used to be a video hosted on bullshido.net where for some reason a group of people grabbed this woman and were forcing her to fight with this other woman who really hated her. The victim eventually pulled a knife but because she was too timid to use it they just took it away from her and it made them even more aggressive towards her. |
That's a perfect example of someone who does not understand when they should pull their weapon.
| QUOTE |
| So, honestly, I wouldn't carry a knife unless I knew for sure that I'd be able to whip it out and, without a second thought, slash someone in the deadliest way possible. |
And that's exactly the kind of stuff you need to think about when you decide whether or not to carry. I don't get why some people see training as the be-all, end-all solution to everything. Then again, most people like having their meals handed to them on a plate without having to work for it themselves. Except in this case it could get them killed.
Shrapnel
Sep 20 2006, 02:28 AM
You guys should just follow my motto:
When in doubt, shoot it out!It pretty much takes the guesswork right out of it...
Critias
Sep 20 2006, 05:11 AM
| QUOTE (Shrapnel) |
You guys should just follow my motto:
When in doubt, shoot it out!
It pretty much takes the guesswork right out of it... |
Neat motto. It's nice of them to let you get on the internet from prison.
SL James
Sep 20 2006, 05:25 AM
| QUOTE (lollerskates @ Sep 19 2006, 07:44 PM) |
| QUOTE (SL James) | | QUOTE (lollerskates @ Sep 19 2006, 04:53 PM) | | QUOTE (SL James) | | Abstract thought is, like Kage said, utterly devoid of meaning. |
One way that abstract thought is useful is that it teaches you your limits.
|
Sure. It teaches you have abstract your thinking can be before it turns into lunacy.
|
I have no idea what that even means. Then again, why am I not surprised?
|
Because I was typing it while standing at the computer before I had to run out the door, smartass.
What I meant to say was: Sure. It teaches you how abstract your thinking can be before it turns into lunacy. That is, it teaches you the limit between abstract thought and batshit crazy ideas.
Outside of that, it's devoid of any meaning or use whatsoever.
lollerskates
Sep 20 2006, 05:31 AM
Whatever you say, champ. Honestly, I don't even know why I bother.
Shrapnel
Sep 20 2006, 06:42 AM
| QUOTE (Critias) |
| QUOTE (Shrapnel @ Sep 19 2006, 09:28 PM) | You guys should just follow my motto:
When in doubt, shoot it out!
It pretty much takes the guesswork right out of it... |
Neat motto. It's nice of them to let you get on the internet from prison.
|
Easy there, Critias.
I just happen to be on your side in this argument. I just thought I'd interject with a little humor, hence the smiley...
On the subject of training, I feel that it has everything to do with mindset, and mindset has everything to do with one's ability to effectively defend themselves.
You can carry any weapon you like, but without the proper mindset, you might not be able to use it, not even to save your own life or the lives of your family. But if you train for the possibility that you might one day have to use it, you will be far better prepared to do so if the time ever comes.
Also remember that in most situations, people tend to fall back on muscle memory. If you have trained a certain way, actions start to become second nature, and you can perform them without thinking. If you lack this training, you will probably hesitate, and it may cost you your life.
For instance, some people may carry a firearm for self defense, but how many who do so also know how to properly clear a stovepipe jam, a failure to feed, or a failure to go fully into battery? Those who train frequently can often do these things without thinking, and can do them quite quickly. Those who don't train will be left staring at a useless hunk of metal, trying to figure out why it doesn't work.
People always talk about having a weapon taken away from you and used against you. This may certainly be the case for someone who only uses their knife for opening boxes and cellophane wrappers, or the person who only practices with their firearm once every couple of years. These are the people you see in movies, who are shaking like a leaf, and unable to pull the trigger or make the attack when the time comes. These are the people who are more easily disarmed, and often rendered helpless.
Yet you take the example of someone who uses their knife regularly, and practices with it often, or the person who trains with their firearm frequently. What do you think the odds are of them being disarmed, or hesitating to react when necessary? There is still that chance, as nothing in a fight is ever certain, but at least they will have the training and the mindset to back them up. The proper training also gives them a better feel for when they might need to use such force, or when they can avoid a conflict altogether.
Sorry for the long-winded rant, but this is a subject that I am very opinionated about. I've just been trying to resist the urge to comment until now.
Personally, I feel that training is a great tool, and should be sought whenever possible. Of course, some people don't have that luxury, and I can't fault them for wanting to protect themselves, even without the proper training. An armed person with no training still has a greater chance to defend themselves than an unarmed person.
Remember folks, criminals prefer unarmed victims.
hyzmarca
Sep 20 2006, 06:50 AM
| QUOTE (lollerskates) |
| QUOTE (Wounded Ronin) | | There used to be a video hosted on bullshido.net where for some reason a group of people grabbed this woman and were forcing her to fight with this other woman who really hated her. The victim eventually pulled a knife but because she was too timid to use it they just took it away from her and it made them even more aggressive towards her. |
That's a perfect example of someone who does not understand when they should pull their weapon.
|
When? Maybe. Maybe she should hav epulled it eariler. I couldn't comment without seeing the video. It is, however, a perfect example of someone who was foolish enough to draw a weapon without being willing to use it. If you draw a weapon then you reasonably believe that you are in danger of serious bodily harm, anything less and you are already commiting a crime. If you feel that you are in such danger then you are perfectly justified if you really messed someone up and this is the point of using a weapon, to mess the other guy(s) up before you yourself get messed up. This requires an sort of agressive response rather than a passive one. When your life is in danger ducking into a shell is far less effective than charging up and putting holes into your enemy.
Personally, I would say that the individual should have reasonably believed that she was in danger of serious bodily harm or death. Friends in Melee is as much a bitch in real life as it is in SR. Fighting multiple attackers is difficult, at best, and impossible unless you have some extreme advantage. Likewise, the mob mentality makes it more difficult for an attacking group to make reasonable decisions. If one gets in a hit all may follow suit and in thir exuberance they may kill even if they did not intend to. When faced with a violent mob and no means of escape using extreme deadly force against the mob's leader (or the entire mob if you have enough bullets) is the only reasonable and reliable way to survive.
Critias
Sep 20 2006, 07:10 AM
| QUOTE |
| I just happen to be on your side in this argument. I just thought I'd interject with a little humor, hence the smiley... |
Yeah, I know, I was just joking along with you. Forgot the smiley, but, hey, that's life. My bad.
And as for all the rest -- big fat +1. There's a few guys I hang out with on other sights that run training courses for civilians, LEOs, military types that want extra stuff, etc. They've got two motto-thingies that always stick with me. "You will not rise to the occasion, you will fall back on your training" is the first one. It's a little reminder that you won't turn into Rambo just 'cause the situation calls for Rambo to be there -- you'll only do as well as you've done during practice, practice, practice.
The second is a t-shirt I've seen their instructors wear, when I've seen images and videos and stuff from their classes. It says "MINDSET" in great big giant letters on the top. Then it says "TRAINING" in medium sized letters in the middle, and in teensy tiny letters down at the bottom (where it might not even show up, if you tuck your shirt in), it says "gear."
Because that's the order of importance, right there. You can have the snazziest, sexiest, most tricked-out uber-tactical gun in the world, and it don't do you a lick of good if you (a) don't know where the magazine goes, or (b) aren't willing to pull the trigger. The same holds true for a super-big Bowie knife (versus a skilled and determined opponent wielding a box cutter), the coolest ninja melee weapons in the world (against a skilled and determined opponent with a crowbar), etc, etc. Even the best of the best will tell you, it's 90% mental and 10% physical.
Angelone
Sep 20 2006, 02:06 PM
I would like to add if you have to train in something to prepare for a bad situation, have it be your legs. That means RUN! Only fall back on violence if there is no other option.
Mindset, training, self defense tools and the will to use them are fine and good, but the fight you don't get into is a fight you will never lose.
Edit- for clarity
Critias
Sep 20 2006, 02:27 PM
For many situations, and many (mostly single) people, that's very sound advice. The best self defense investment many people can make is a good pair of running shoes and a gym membership.
But it all depends on what sort of "bad situation" you're trying to prepare for. I can outrun my wife -- that doesn't mean I'm going to, if we're both accosted by bad men on the street who wish to harm us despite us peacefully handing over wallets and purses. There's only one door into and out of my apartment, with the bedroom as far away from that entrance/exit as it's possible to be -- sprinting in circles around the bed won't get home invaders to leave me alone, and in order to run past them I have to run through them.
And, similarly, it would help you be able to run if you were to give someone about to chase you a mouthfull of mace first. That's why my wife -- no Olympic sprinter, especially after a long shift at the hospital -- has the keychain she does.
Etc, etc.
Running is all well and good, and 99% of the time it's absolutely the best answer. But if you're trying to look out for more people than just yourself, or if you're already in a place that's supposed to be "safe," it's not quite as usefull.