Yesterday I realise that Orcs got some deficiences as meta-humans that could explain why their growth rate are going down.

Orcs women give birth to a litter of 4 to 8 youngs (dont get me started on the semantics of the books).

But.

Orcs women still only have 2 breasts. So they cannot feed that much baby at the same time.

If you look at the mammals you will find that orcs are an exception to the rule that say that the number of breast are proportionnals to the number of births. On the other hand Orcs are the only primates that give birth to so many babies at the same time regularly.

So I ask the author to make their position clear :

Either the Orks go back to the more normal number of babies born but with a much faster gestation time

or

They go the full way they start, make Orks really animals and give Orcs female the 2 to 4 breast they currently lack in their evolutionnary path (for a total of 4 to 6).

Note : I am fairly aware that the modern world provide ample way to sustain babies without only ressorting to the mother ressource. But Nature usually dont care and used to provide the required equipment that go with the birth rate.

Well for humans, they made the wheel. Orks, learned how to make breast pumps.

Because orks are clearly homo sapiens, I suspect that the magical changes that occurred to make them have lots of kids are too recent for evolution to catch up and provide them with the mammaries to match.

It is interesting to note that the 4th world Orks doesn't share the spawn rate of the SR4 ones.

"Well for humans, they made the wheel. Orks, learned how to make breast pumps."

And are supposed to let half their newborn die in place where they dont have access to medical supply ?

Also I am not a woman, but I dont think that, even when pumping on, 2 breast can feed 8 childs. An that is just the upper average.

Frankly I think they need to just cross off the stupidity of their idea that : orcs are just animals that breed like vermins and go back to the : Orks are metahumans that lives fast and die youngs and so they need a faster breeding.

Being a magical race it is entirely plausible that they produce more milk than humans, they would require more sustenance than your average pregnant human of course but there is no reason it would be physiologically impossible.

Aside from the unusually fast breeding rate, I've never seen any canon reference to orks (why do you put the c in sometimes and the k others?) being "just animals that breed like vermins [sic]". Where are you getting that from?

Actually I think without access to medical supply half their newborns will die for other reasons.

Stone Age childbirth rates (and life expectancy in general) were abysmal. Anyway maybe the difference in litter size is due to modern nutrition, hormones or even pollutants?

I post orCs and orKs because I just cant decide on how to type it correctly (Tolkien or W40k...) and because in my native language it is Orque.

For me speaking of Orcs women giving birth to a 'Litter' is derogative and animalize them. The way they were and are hunt by some humans and meta-humans lobbies and settled into ghettos clearly show that they are viewed as sub-humans. Goblinisation was treated as a illness at start and still is view badly.

Just look how many Orks are SINLess in regards of Human or Elves.

Or the fact that they often have multiple birth might be some evolutionary trait that has recently developed, or might be induced by some of the living conditions of the 6th world orks...

Orcs dont need milk? They are fed beef chops as babies! They are TOUGH!!!! XD

Well, probably soy-beef chops in the better case anyway

What makes you think orc mammary glands work like human ones? And why should orc mothers have to feed all their babies at once ?

Because they are still Homo Sapiens and are supposed to be geneticaly compatible.
And an ork mother is supposed to be able to feed his human baby, and a human mother can feed his ork baby (rarer case).

Even if they dont feed them all at once, they need to have/produce enough milk for all of them.

I am fairly aware my post is borderline, but I wanted to point out how silly was the new idea that Ork birth rate put them more in the range with animals than meta-humans or primates. The suggested SR4, birth rate is complety out of whack and should be corrected because it make so little sense.

Orcs birth rate is an anomaly even in the Awakened world as it is the only species whose birth rate doesnt comply with is physiology, awakened or not, science or not.

I think it is detrimental to the Ork meta-types because it make them more alien and more close to the green hordes of usual med-fan roleplaying games than the evolued and intelligent meta-human they are supposed to be. I know they choose to sever the link with the 4th world but it is also very weird that 6th world Orks give birth to 2 to 3 times more childrens than their older counterpart (of course in the 4th world meta-human species aren't metahuman at all as they dont mix genetically and are no more compatible, thus no more Homo Sapiens but a true species).

So, what does any of that have to do with the questions I asked?

Orc breasts allow feeding multiple children, one after the other. ZOMG, that would TOTALLY destroy every last bit of SR canon...

Orcs could be communal like Native Americans and have others help feed the chirrens...

A few things:

Orks are about the same size as Humans.
Ork women have a Y-shaped uterus and hence the multiple babies.
Since they are having more babies in the same body the babies are therefore smaller on average than human babies.

Orks are fully physically and sexually mature at 8 years old.
That's about half the time that it takes a human child.
Ergo we can probably assume that they nurse for half the time of a human baby.

According to the website I just read it seems that a human woman will be breast feeding for about 20 minutes out of every 2 hours (16.7% of the time).
This ratio goes down as the baby matures.

So basically, assuming a full litter of completely healthy babies (which is unlikely given socio-political situation) I'd say that basically, for 1 year after giving birth an ork woman basically becomes a milk factory and does little else. But is fully capable of feeding all of them with only 2 breasts.

Edit: Jon and Kate plus 8. Humans do it too.

It is ideal that a woman breast feed their children for two years. But most times the mother stops breast-feeding as early as 9-12 months, sometimes even more. Using the same comparison, an Ork mother could stop breast feeding as early as 4-6 months, also, depending on medical/magical support, half the babies might not even live that long. I don't think my suspension of disbelief has been grounded because of how Orks reproduce.

I think it is a very good point. Ork's are still animals, like all metahumans no matter how advanced the society. It almost seems to imply that Orks are designed to have a very high infant mortality rate. Like Fraternal twins might be common, but usually, 'in the wild' only one would make it to full term but with modern health care (snort ofl aughter) often many go full term resulting in 'litters' of ork babies.

Your reason and logic have no place on Dumpshock.
And new age hipsters do this as well

BlueMax
/at least where I live

Remember due to the stat differences between orks and humans, those ork babies are signifigantly more resistant to disease and enviromental factors than a human child.

A disease that requires 1 sucess on a BODY roll will kill 2/3 of the human children (assuming minimum body for an infant) while an ork infant can reasonalby expect to pull through.

Remember that evolution doesn't happen based solely on the creature in question, but as a total sum of its surroundings. Yes, Orks (might) breed faster than the mother can provide milk for the babies, but other options exist, such as formula. And since an option like formula exists, an Ork could evolve to include formula as an option. Basically the existence of formula causes Orks to evolve in such a way that they use formula to ensure their survival, kind of like the existence of seeds causes birds to evolve a certain way to use seeds to ensure their survival.

And that's only one possibility. It is equally possible that Ork mothers produce more milk than a Human mother (kind of like I'm sure a Whale produces more milk than a Human), or that there is a high infant mortality rate due to Ork mothers being unable to provide food for their children (which is basically expected of any creature that has a high birth rate/litter size), or Ork children don't need as much milk as Human children, or Ork children drink longer but less frequently to allow the mother time to switch between babies. Really, there are tons of possibilities that make Orks having high birth rates entirely reasonable without having to resort to 'it's magic' or 'it defies science' or anything similar.

also the litter size of 6-8 is likely in the same frequency of twins and triplets 1-4 seams the more standard amount.

Orks are not 'evolved' for a baby formula civilization.

Not true, ork mothers regulary grind up elves and other plants, to make a juicey drink that is high in fiber for the little 'un to drink. Juiced elf isn't quite as tasty as dwarf-toe soup, but you don't get as much sould out of one dwarf as you get juice out of one elf.

I would like to point out a few things. First of all orks, humans, dwarfs, trolls, and even elves are all mammals. The all belong the the Homo Sapiens family.

Homo Sapiens Sapiens
Homo Sapiens Robustus
Homo Sapiens Pumilonis
Homo Sapiens Ingentis
Homo Sapiens Nobilis

Because of this every metahuman is a mammal and an animal. Furthermore all metahumans belong to the Great Ape family/genus (I forget which exactly). Incidences of multiple births in primates is not common, but it is by no means that rare. Additionally the number of children, on average, that a female will bear is usually tied directly to the circumstances of the environment. In places with high infant mortality, short lifespan, and poor medical care there are often more children born. Conversely, in areas with low infant mortality, decent lifespan, and adequate medical care the average is alot closer to two children per female, or just enough to maintain population. Now of course this statement is in regards to humans in particular I do not see such a difference in 60 years. After all the socioeconomic structures that dictate average childbirth will remain much the same.

In summation, orks are mammals just like all the other metahumans.

Did the OP ask if orks were mammals?

Sorry but your post blatantly contradicts the theory of evolution by natural selection and I will gladly show you why:

1.: Orks are homo spaiens, As such they share the features and characteristics of homo spaiens. That includes two breasts and a greatly enlarged frontal lobe.
2.: Evolution goes by selection preassure, meaning those traits that favour your own procreation or the procreation of one of your kin tend to accumulate. Having 4 breasts is "weird" in a Metahuman environment. "Weird" tranlates into reduced attraction to the other sex and that decreases the chance to pass on your genes. By the theory of evolution, 4 or 6 breasts would fairly soon fall off the radar.
3.: What would normally help the evolution of more than 2 breasts (the ability to better feed more offspring), is completely redundant in human society. If you can't feed them with your own breasts, go buy some bottles. Technology took off a large part of the evolutionary preassure humans were subject to in the past. That's why we have "little people" for excemple, or diseases like Parkinson or Multiple Sclerosis.
4.: Regular human females have shown the ability to be perfectly able to raise 4 or more kids at once, even if from the same litter.

(and on a sidenote, I don't find the term "litter" derogatory at all. It's a technical term. Does it portray Orcs as animals? Sure. They are animals. As are we!)

It's also a non-technical term, which denigrates orks. Not that there's anything wrong with denigrating orks.

True, but the entire way the metatype entries are written in is (pseudo-)scientific in nature. As such, the word "litter" should be taken as a technical term.

I have twin babies, therefore I am an expert, and you should listen to me. With "only" two I want to strangle them or myself at times so I can only assume orks actually do it. They either discard the runts, eat them, or let them duke it out for access to milk.

Now can we get this thread back on topic and talk about breasts some more? I love breasts.

Mesh

I'm sure that couples from the beginning of time have had multiple births (my father happened to be a triplet), and I'm sure that they were able to juggle the complexities of feeding times.

"I'm putting 50 nuyen on Bobby."
"Please, Bobby? I'm going for Beth, she fills her dipper with more a day than Bobby even weighs."
"Come on, all bets in! Infant Ork Battles, Bobby vs. Beth for an hour of breast milk is about to start. Watch those toddlers duke it out for the right to eat!"

Hey!... That was just rude and uncalled for... Expect a Call from MOM sometime this week (and if that does not change your mind, then we will just contact the Sons of Sauron next)...

Keep the Faith

Does this mean we're not getting 8 breasted ork porn?



-karma

Of course not. You're totally getting that. 2070: CGI, illusion, and 'ware. Yeah, there's a porn for that.

That's what changelings are for.

Keep in mind, that goblinization occured in 2021, and the orks started out as humans.

That, and orks are magic.

So are breasts.

Mesh

Is it wrong if I laughed out loud while reading this?

Rule 34 holds true no matter how far in the future it is.

IT'S MAGIC. *facepalms*

Seriously now. Drakes shapeshift into forms many times their mass. Technomancers compile sprites on the fly. There are critters only able to survive in urban environments. Etc. Many strange things happen in Shadowrun.
Every time you apply real life logic to pnp, God kills a loli catgirl.

Heheheheh... Poor Catgirls...

Keep the Faith

I fail to see the downside.

-applies a character with Logic 7.-

So, how many loli catgirls died just now?

That's because you're just a robot, D2F.

Maybe you could just set the birthrate whatever you want for your game and make the current up to 8 babies a wrong rumor made up by humanis. for some reason it got picked up by culture and became "true" when it isnt.

That's only partially true

But now to something completely different: do ork-babies have body 4 and strenght 3?^^

Yes.
They also already have tusks. This is to poke extra holes and get milk faster.

BlueMax