galvatron42
Jul 11 2010, 02:43 AM
I'm currently helping my friend make his character for Gencon. While buying skills, he wanted to take dodge. I told him that dodge only works against melee attacks, but then he showed me that one of the specializations listed under the dodge skill is for ranged attacks. So how does that work? Can you use dodge against a ranged attack if you have specialized in it, or is it an error in the book? I checked the SR4A changes document and there is nothing mentioned about changes to defending against ranged attacks. Also of note, I have very little experience with the system and he has never played, so we are pretty close to lost. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Gamer6432
Jul 11 2010, 02:47 AM
By RAW as I understand it, Ranged Defense is Reaction. Full Ranged Defense is Reaction + Dodge. Melee Defense is Reaction + Dodge. Full Melee Defense is Reaction + Dodge + Dodge.
Udoshi
Jul 11 2010, 02:52 AM
Yeah, uh, dodge works against everything, dude.
In defending against RANGED
....you roll reaction. (this is why guns are deadly. Its stat+skill+smartlink vs one attribute alone)
in defending against MELEE
Its Reaction + Dodge(dodge) OR Block(Unarmed) OR Parry(weaponskill)
Additionally, Full Defense ADDS the following options to the above. Yes, a full parry adds weapon skill twice.
Dodge OR Parry(weapon skill or unarmed) OR Gymnastics(Full Defense is the only way to get Gymdodge going).
Hope that answers things.
Additionally, dodge is specifically called out when rigging/driving.
galvatron42
Jul 11 2010, 03:05 AM
That helps a bunch. Thanks. Another question, does full defense take your entire turn, or can you change it on your next initiative pass. Example, I have 3 initiative passes from enhanced reflexes. I attack on my first pass, full defense on my second pass, and attack again on my 3rd pass. Or am I locked into full defense on each pas I have that turn. Thanks again!
Glyph
Jul 11 2010, 03:54 AM
Full defense lasts until your next Action Phase.
Also, full defense can be taken as an interrupt action that uses your next available action. As an example, let's take your hypothetical guy with three initiative passes. He uses his first action to attack, then when the security guards return fire, he declares full defense. He doesn't get his second Action Phase, but on his third initiative pass, he can go again.
Yerameyahu
Jul 11 2010, 03:57 AM
Full Defense is a Complex Action, and it lasts until your next Action Phase (IP) begins.
Saint Sithney
Jul 11 2010, 06:20 AM
And since it's a Complex Action, you can still take a Free Action, like running for your life.
Stahlseele
Jul 11 2010, 10:24 AM
"Missed me!" *bllllllllllllllllll* as a free action is frowned upon though.
Medicineman
Jul 11 2010, 10:51 AM
QUOTE (Saint Sithney @ Jul 11 2010, 02:20 AM)

And since it's a Complex Action, you can still take a Free Action, like running for your life.
Running for life is (IIRC) a simple action. Moving away is for free
with a free Dance
Medicineman
Yerameyahu
Jul 11 2010, 11:59 AM
Moving for your life, then.
Glyph
Jul 11 2010, 07:54 PM
Running (which is simply using the running rate instead of the walking rate) is a free action.
Sprinting (making a Running + Strength test to improve your running distance) is a simple action.
Medicineman
Jul 11 2010, 09:23 PM
QUOTE (Glyph @ Jul 11 2010, 03:54 PM)

Sprinting (making a Running + Strength test to improve your running distance) is a simple action.
And that is exactly what I would call "Running for your Life "

Hough !
Medicineman
Udoshi
Jul 12 2010, 02:35 AM
If you're in that sort of situation, where you need to run for your life, you should really spend Edge to take another action.
Then use it to Run away, instead of kind of....... moseying away from harm at a casual stroll while on full defense.
Abstruse
Jul 12 2010, 02:58 AM
QUOTE (Gamer6432 @ Jul 10 2010, 08:47 PM)

By RAW as I understand it, Ranged Defense is Reaction. Full Ranged Defense is Reaction + Dodge. Melee Defense is Reaction + Dodge. Full Melee Defense is Reaction + Dodge + Dodge.
I was just reading these rules in prep for a game coming up. You missed a bit on melee dodge. Here's the full breakdown:
NO Full Defense Action:
Ranged Attack: Reaction (Edge can be used)
Ranged Attack (Suppressive Fire): Reaction + Edge
Melee Attack (untrained): Reaction + Dodge
Melee Attack (trained): Reaction + (Combat Skill)
Full Defense Action:
Ranged Attack: Reaction + Dodge (Edge can be used)
Ranged Attack (Suppressive Fire): Reaction + Edge + Dodge
Melee Attack (untrained): Reaction + Dodge + Dodge
Melee Attack (trained): Reaction + (Combat Skill) + Dodge
Note: I made no distinction between Parry and Block as it's just a matter of using the related armed combat skill vs. using Unarmed Combat.
Also, in melee, you have the choice between which to use depending on whether you wish to declare Full Defense or which skill you'd like to use (Dodge = Dodge, Parry = armed combat skill (Edged Weapons, Clubs, etc), Block = Unarmed Combat)
Udoshi
Jul 12 2010, 03:32 AM
I really don't see how that's an improvement over my list, above. About the only thing you've added is suppressive fire. You've also missed several melee defenses - reaction + combat skill + combat skill is entirely possible.
Whether or not you're trained doesn't matter;because you can still default, - listing it is just confusing. It also doesn't account for gymnastic dodging.
Yerameyahu
Jul 12 2010, 04:11 AM
K.I.S.S.: Full Defense adds Dodge or Gymnastics or Melee/Unarmed, as appropriate, to the existing defense pool. Done.
Dakka Dakka
Jul 12 2010, 07:28 AM
@suppressive fire: You don't need to defend at all. All you need to do is spend a free action to drop prone. No one forbids you to shoot back while prone either.
Yerameyahu
Jul 12 2010, 03:20 PM
Good old prone.

But, not everyone's always ready for that, so suppression has uses.
Stahlseele
Jul 12 2010, 03:22 PM
with a bipod or tripod weapon, dropping prone actually makes it easier to shoot back too . . but no dodging or anything fancy, just stand, or rather, in this case, lie and deliver . . if you wanna deal, you had better be able to take it too . .
Dakka Dakka
Jul 12 2010, 03:44 PM
As soon as you're prone, you are not damaged by suppressive fire. That's the beauty of it.
What makes you think that you cannot dodge, when you're prone?
QUOTE ('SR4A p. 159')
Characters who are on the ground have a more difficult time getting out of the way and suffer a –2 dice pool modifier. This modifier does not apply to defending against ranged attacks unless the attacker is extremely close (5 meters or less).
Stahlseele
Jul 12 2010, 03:48 PM
O.o
OK . .
Brazilian_Shinobi
Jul 12 2010, 04:12 PM
QUOTE (Dakka Dakka @ Jul 12 2010, 12:44 PM)

As soon as your prone, you are not damaged by suppressive fire. That's the beauty of it.
What makes you think that you cannot dodge, when you're prone?
Which does not make any sense. Ok, you are just rolling Reaction to "dodge" the shot, but when you are prone there isn't much you can do except to roll over (and possibly die?). The attacker is probably having a penalty for cover since you reduced your hitting area.
Dakka Dakka
Jul 12 2010, 04:17 PM
QUOTE (Brazilian_Shinobi @ Jul 12 2010, 06:12 PM)

Which does not make any sense. Ok, you are just rolling Reaction to "dodge" the shot, but when you are prone there isn't much you can do except to roll over (and possibly die?). The attacker is probably having a penalty for cover since you reduced your hitting area.
While this would make sense, the rules say otherwise. Anyone who drops prone or is already prone is immune to suppressive fire. Unless the shooter is very close a prone character can "dodge" the shot normally. Remember dodging is not dodging bullets Neo-style but not being where the attacker is likely to shoot.
Brazilian_Shinobi
Jul 12 2010, 05:33 PM
QUOTE (Dakka Dakka @ Jul 12 2010, 01:17 PM)

While this would make sense, the rules say otherwise. Anyone who drops prone or is already prone is immune to suppressive fire. Unless the shooter is very close a prone character can "dodge" the shot normally. Remember dodging is not dodging bullets Neo-style but not being where the attacker is likely to shoot.
I know, and I'm not exactly complaining about supressive fire, I'm complaining about taking pot-shots against someone who is over 100ft away without cover and lying prone. I would penalized on shooting a small target, sure. But the attacked person wouldn't have much room to avoid being hit in the first place.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.