QUOTE (Kruger @ Sep 27 2010, 12:51 PM)

From what I saw of that map, there was less than half of Ontario left. It's an interesting thought to see if an independent Ontario could survive, but it loses its northern half, which is the rural half with much of the natural resources aside from the hydroelectric power of the Niagara river. You can call right now an "aside" and a "blip" but imagine the "blip" caused by the shake-up of the world's economy, and the extreme trauma to the American economy which, like it or not, is the anchor of the Ontario economy because of the fact that it is based primarily on the motor vehicle industry and ever increasing urbanization that is diminishing its agricultural industry. Ontario is essentially the Canadian Michigan, and by 2050+ probably owned mostly by Ares and Japanese corps, lol.
Many SR timeline nations survive just fine with major multinational corporate ownership. The large, northern chunk of Ontario is boreal forest, most of it unsuitable for agriculture. The prime agricultural land is in the south, by the Great Lakes. There is a fair bit of mining and forestry in the north. Of course Ontario's industrial output depends heavily on the American market (decreasingly so in the last few years), but what reason would there be for that market connection to change? The poorer market in the US indeed would be an issue, but it doesn't collapse. Neither would that of Ontario. The robustness of the Canadian economy in general and that of Ontario in particular shows already today. And there still is that buffer of 20 billion dollars a year. Coincidentally, that value is roughly equal to the "Transportation Equipment" sector of the Ontario to which you allude, which makes up just over 19% of the
province's GDP. All of this is in the context of the fluff of SR which shows only Québec going it alone. That's not rational.
QUOTE
I dunno. I understand your nationalism,
Nationalism without Rationalism is a deadly trap (see above). I honestly try to avoid that. If my arguments don't make sense and are countered logically and with facts, it behooves me to change my opinion.
QUOTE
but I just don't see how Ontario survives independently losing many of its international markets, and cut off from everything that makes Canada rich. Joining the United States gives it access to the intact infrastructure of the heartland of the US.
It already has that.
QUOTE
I'm just saying that if 5% of Canada's land mass was merging with 50% of America's, I just don't see the UCAS thing. Ottawa at that point probably would see no real viable options.
Or look at it another way, 35% to 40% of the population of Canada, running about 40% of the industry maintains its close and cordial relationship with 50% of the US population.
QUOTE
But the shake-ups make for a more diverse and "alien" future for the players.
I'll buy that one!