X-Kalibur
Mar 4 2007, 11:28 AM
What, 25% more? Most weapons are under

2000 so I don't see that as too big a factor. Hell, you pay that much a premium to get a left-handed guitar these days.
nezumi
Mar 4 2007, 01:22 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
| Like I say, where they may come in "useful" they're superceded by more readily available weapons such as sawn off shotguns, the Thunderbolt, Guardian, Warhawk and Hatamoto. |
Frankly, I'd consider the Hatamoto (and possibly the Warhawk) as VHPs anyway. I can't imagine *I* as an 'average human' would be able to fire either without hurting myself.
Hullbreach - your definitions don't cover revolvers, which are SS.
Mistwalker
Mar 4 2007, 01:32 PM
For the argument that there would be a problem due to getting in ammo for the VHP in the army, well, how many types of ammo are already in use? 9mm pistol, .45 ACP, SMG ammo (may be the same as pistol ammo), P90 ammo, assault rifle ammo, sniper rifle ammo (various calibers), LMG, MMG, HMG, and so on.
So, I would say it would not be a problem to get VHP ammo in a military unit.
For the argument that they would issue them with MGs or PACs, well, that is fine, as long as you are in the field, with long sight lines. Once you get them into built up areas, they will need another weapon (their back up weapon?)
Special forces would probably love to have a pistol with extreme stopping power for close quarters combat, be the wielder a troll, or heavily augmented human, orc or elf.
Bodyguards would love to have that same stopping power, one shot take down, even if the target is a car (tis why I asked if it could cause problems to the engine block of a vehicle) that is trying to run down their client.
For a comparison of today, do you really need an assault rifle to go hunting, bamby hunting? No, but there is a large number of assault rifles that have been sold so that their owners could go hunting if they so wanted. It is partly status symbol, partly self-defence. If you could effectively wield bigger guns, then more people would own them.
The only argument that I have heard against VHP that had me pause a bit, was the one about game balance. Which is why I originally said that I couldn't see barrel attachements for VHP, to treat them like heavy weapons, so no nifty silencer. No silencer, massive noise everytime it is shot, most likely having the report automatically upgraded to HTR response, fast mage astral scouting, and in general, a higher and faster response all around, due to the fact that either trolls or augmented humand, ork or elves involved (responders are probably praying that it not be augmented trolls).
Will I go out and immediately create these? No.
I will look at it if a player asks, or if I come up with a good plot line for them, or someone else does all the work and I can lift their efforts into my world.
Austere Emancipator
Mar 4 2007, 01:43 PM
| QUOTE (Mistwalker) |
| For the argument that there would be a problem due to getting in ammo for the VHP in the army, well, how many types of ammo are already in use? 9mm pistol, .45 ACP, SMG ammo (may be the same as pistol ammo), P90 ammo, assault rifle ammo, sniper rifle ammo (various calibers), LMG, MMG, HMG, and so on. |
No. Not in the real world anyway. The pistol ammunition is the same as the SMG ammunition: 9x19mm M882 NATO standard ball/FMJ. Assault rifle and LMG/SAW ammunition is the same: 5.56x45mm M855 NATO standard ball/FMJ, with M856 NATO standard tracer rounds thrown in for good measure. GPMG ammunition is the same caliber as most sniper rifles: 7.62x51mm M80 NATO standard ball/FMJ and M62 NATO standard tracer, or M118 special (more accurate) ball/FMJ when available for the sniper rifles. Anti-material rifles and HMG again use the exact same ammo: 12.7x99mm ball/FMJ, API, SLAP and MP.
That's 4 different calibers, with weapons in those calibers using interchangeable ammunition, to serve every major small arm in the US Army inventory.
Special forces often do their own thing anyway, so this means little for them. Judging by the fact that they rarely go beyond .45 ACP, I doubt they'd be hugely enamored by the idea of a massive, clumsy, low-capacity weapon using a rare type of ammunition, unless they might need to engage trolls or other very large critters in close quarters along with generic types of threats that require them to bring in all their normal weaponry as well.
Mistwalker
Mar 4 2007, 01:58 PM
The P-90 isn't part of the use arsenal? I thought it was, which is why I included it, as it is a different caliber than the usual 5.56, it is a 5.7. As well, there is a pistol that uses that ammo, the FN Five-seveN. Is that not also part of the US arsenal?
Again, I was under the impression that the 45 ACP pistol was still part of the US arsenal as well.
Don't the Marines use a 30-06 sniper rifle? or am I confusing them with someone else?
Austere Emancipator
Mar 4 2007, 02:20 PM
Neither the FN F-N or P90 are even type classified for the US military AFAIK, let alone in use in significant amounts. I cannot rule out the possibility that lone US servicemen, especially as part of special operation forces, might personally make use of those weapons, but they are not part of the US Army inventory.
.45 ACP handguns are in use by the US Marine Corps (the MEU(SOC) pistols) and some other special forces units (M1911s, Mk 23 Mod 0s). Someone can check the other procurement budgets (I can't connect to finance.hq.navy.mil at the moment for some reason), but .45 ACP doesn't appear in the US Army procurement budgets at all between 2005 and 2009.
Obviously there are small arms in other calibers in use in the US Armed Forces -- shotguns, .22 LR special purpose weapons, and .300 Winchester Magnum sniper rifles, for example -- but the numbers are so small that I felt limiting my above message to the "major small arms" was not misleading. "Special purpose weapons", like the VHP would be if it ever did come into any kind of use by militaries, would simply fall outside the ammo standardization systems, and would only see use by special operations forces when there is an overriding need for one and no pre-existing weapon system would fill the role as well.
Butterblume
Mar 4 2007, 02:27 PM
| QUOTE (Mistwalker) |
| The P-90 isn't part of the use arsenal? I thought it was |
To much watching Stargate perhaps, where the P90 is standard issue

.
Mistwalker
Mar 4 2007, 03:01 PM
| QUOTE (Butterblume) |
| QUOTE (Mistwalker) | | The P-90 isn't part of the use arsenal? I thought it was |
To much watching Stargate perhaps, where the P90 is standard issue  . |
Got it.
That and reading some reports about special forces using them, as well as them being considered for armored personnel.
Mistwalker
Mar 4 2007, 03:05 PM
| QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) |
| Obviously there are small arms in other calibers in use in the US Armed Forces -- shotguns, .22 LR special purpose weapons, and .300 Winchester Magnum sniper rifles, for example -- but the numbers are so small that I felt limiting my above message to the "major small arms" was not misleading. "Special purpose weapons", like the VHP would be if it ever did come into any kind of use by militaries, would simply fall outside the ammo standardization systems, and would only see use by special operations forces when there is an overriding need for one and no pre-existing weapon system would fill the role as well. |
Never doubted that you were trying to mislead. I have always found your posts factual and helpful.
But you have, in a back handed way, helped prove my point how that getting VHP ammo in the military wouldn't be extremely hard, as long as they were issue for someone.
I never expected that the VHP would be standard issue (unless you have an all troll or augmented force), but do expect that you would be able to get ammo for it, as long as you filled out the proper paperwork.
HullBreach
Mar 4 2007, 03:31 PM
Well until very recently (from a historical standpoint) it wasn't uncommon for troops to provide some of ther own weapons and ammo. A great example of this is that in WW2 while the Germans were issued the Luger, many chose to purchase and use Mausers instead.
In the American Civil War (or the War of Northern Agression for you southern types) there are several examples of wealthy officers to nearly bankrupting themselves to outfit their units with the latest and most advanced weapons availible.
I have an uncle who actually had his girlfreind mail him his shotgun while he was in Viet Nam.
There has been talk in some circles nowadays about allowing troops to provide their own sidearms if they choose, but I (sadly) think its just wishful thinking.
Darkest Angel
Mar 4 2007, 05:05 PM
| QUOTE (Mistwalker @ Mar 4 2007, 04:05 PM) |
I never expected that the VHP would be standard issue (unless you have an all troll or augmented force), but do expect that you would be able to get ammo for it, as long as you filled out the proper paperwork.  |
That I don't doubt, but: Grunts. Don't. Get. Sidearms.
| QUOTE |
| Special forces would probably love to have a pistol with extreme stopping power for close quarters combat |
If that were true, they'd all carry DEagles today. They don't.
hyzmarca
Mar 4 2007, 05:37 PM
Ammo standardization doesn't really hurt the VHP because a VHP could use standard rifle or machine gun ammo.
One problem with implementing this in SR3 is that rifle ammo is less able to pierce armor than pistol ammo is due to game balance decisions, meaning that putting rifle cartridges into a pistol will make it less effective rather than more effective. The better solution is a very heavy rifle which uses heavy pistol ammo.
HullBreach
Mar 4 2007, 05:38 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
| If that were true, they'd all carry DEagles today. They don't. |
I can't speak for other branches, but Marine Recon (our SF) carry .45's for this reason. A .45 is enough to stop a man nowadays. In the time of SR, where your dealing with widespread use of bodyarmor and tougher than normal targets, somthing bigger would be needed.
The point were making is that whats overkill today will be routine tomorrow due to the changed nature of what your shooting at.
I think alot of folks are trying to approach this with a 2007 mindset, and thats why what were suggesting seems absurd.
knasser
Mar 4 2007, 05:42 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
That I don't doubt, but: Grunts. Don't. Get. Sidearms. |
I don't know if that's true or not, but why should a troll be a grunt, just because he is a troll? You can have a troll with a Logic of 5 which is far smarter than most people. If the average troll has a logic of 2, then that means there's a lot of trolls out there with logic of 3, which is reasonably smart and I would certainly think is a good enough basis to be an officer on with the right skills and knowledges.
But given that there's such a huge potential market, the only real question, as I've said before, is whether trolls would
want these weapons. HullBreach has already illustrated that soldiers may well be bringing along their own little knick knacks (and a troll can certainly carry the extra weight and ammo, so I don't see many officers having a huge problem with it). And given the bigger and tougher targets you get running around in 2070, as well as a lot of trolls wanting to seem tougher than tough, I think quite a few would shell out the 600

for something a bit more special.
IMO.
nezumi
Mar 4 2007, 06:53 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
That I don't doubt, but: Grunts. Don't. Get. Sidearms. |
Why do you say this? I was under the impression that a handgun was standard issue for grunts.
Darkest Angel
Mar 4 2007, 06:53 PM
Now you're just getting into an even smaller fringe. Sure, maybe there are officers in the US army today who pack their own personal .50AE DEagles as a sidearm, but if there are more than a handful I'd be very, very surprised.
You're clutching at ever smaller straws Knasser.
And X-Kaliber, if you don't think a 25% premium is a big deal, then you can send some of your extraneous wealth my way; I take paypal.
HullBreach
Mar 4 2007, 07:09 PM
| QUOTE (HullBreach) |
| I think alot of folks are trying to approach this with a 2007 mindset, and thats why what were suggesting seems absurd. |
Once again, stop thinking 2007 and start thinking 2070.
Every major development or change in armaments in history was driven by a need.
Percussion primers replaced flashpan based wheel and flintlock weapons when a monk got pissed about missing ducks spooked by the pre-shot flash.
Cartridge based weapons came about due to frustration with how long muzzle loaders took to reload.
Machineguns were the response to the massed infantry tactics used at the time.
Submachineguns and launched grenades were developed in response to the trench warfare brought about by the development of the machinegun.
Assault rifles are the child of manuever warfare which came about after the obselescence of trench warfare. They filled soldiers needs for a more multi-role weapon, useful both at range and up close.
Heavy-Duty weapons (and I mean more than just pistols) are likely to come about on a battlefield where there are those that can weild them, to fill the need of a troop who needs to kill a bigger tougher enemy than has ever been dealt with before. The military and corporate use of para-critters alone justifies this, without even breaching the subjects of cyberneticially enhanced troops, troops wearing body armor, trolls, and even Drones as potential adversaries.
knasser
Mar 4 2007, 07:51 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Mar 4 2007, 06:53 PM) |
You're clutching at ever smaller straws Knasser. |
How rude! I'm actually just commenting on each part of your argument as you race on looking for ground you can defend. Previous issues have not yet been resolved. When you say that this is an even smaller fringe, it's not a counter because I don't think anyone has accepted that you dismissed any of the previous "fringes."
You seem to be taking everything everyone says by this point as an argument against you. I came late into this thread about a page back pointing out that trolls wouldn't be able to use ordinary-size pistols, anyway. You immediately took it as a comment addressed to you, so don't blame me if ever since I've been locked into responding at every shot you take at my arguments.
To summarise what I see it as so far:
- There will be approximately 60 million trolls in the world. If the same portion of trolls want guns as with humans, then that is a very large market. In fact, trolls probably buy slightly more guns per capita than humans, but this isn't critical to the point.
- Trolls cannot use normal sized pistols, therefore manufacturers must already be catering to trolls with customised weapons, or else trolls do not use pistols.
- Unlike in the present day, there may be a greater application for stopping power in 2070, what with the prevalence of body armour, cyber, trolls and infrantry often replaced with drones. This is a point in favour of producing demand for such weapons.
- Further to the last point, urban environments are also much more heavily armed and armoured, meaning civillian use (which I see as the biggest market) may also want such weapons
- Regardless of need, there is a prestige and status reason. Guns are pretty much the ultimate penis substitute.
- There are no supply reasons why VHPs can't be distributed and no significant manufacturing reasons, either.
Given that VHPs are significantly more powerful and have no disadvantage (if you're a troll), the sole argument against them that I see is the inability to swap ammunition with non VHPs. I don't see this as sufficient because firstly, in military applications as Hyzmarca points out they can use rifle or machinegun ammo. That's assuming that carrying the extra ammo type would be too significant for the army to consider the VHPs and that privately owned VHPs wouldn't be used. But far more importantly than military applications (because of market size), I don't know what sort of scenarios your envisioning where Average Troll thinks to himself, "I'm not going to buy this gun because if I need to shoot more than thirty people, I might not be able to knick ammo from someone else's gun." They're not how I think people will actually think, though.
HullBreach
Mar 4 2007, 08:06 PM
I think you hit the nail on the head with that one Knasser!
The other point to be made here is that when your arming yourself for defense, you don't take 'just enough' you take the biggest baddest thing you can use effectively.
For me, in day to day life, this is a compact .45. For a Troll in 2070, this might very well be a cut-down assault rifle or a custom ultra-heavy pistol.
Why would a troll pack a standard heavy pistol with oversized grips when he can use a much more powerful weapon?
HullBreach
Mar 4 2007, 08:07 PM
| QUOTE (knasser) |
[*]Regardless of need, there is a prestige and status reason. Guns are pretty much the ultimate penis substitute. |
Sweet, this makes me like a hentai tentacle monster!
knasser
Mar 4 2007, 08:15 PM
| QUOTE (HullBreach @ Mar 4 2007, 08:07 PM) |
| QUOTE (knasser @ Mar 4 2007, 02:51 PM) | [*]Regardless of need, there is a prestige and status reason. Guns are pretty much the ultimate penis substitute. |
Sweet, this makes me like a hentai tentacle monster!
|
Synner667
Mar 4 2007, 08:42 PM
Hmmm..
..There's VHPs in various films - Hellboy's pistol, for instance.
I'm sure I remember a Troll Pistol from my SR games [a big pistol, firing shotgun rounds]..
..But maybe that was something I put together for PC enjoyment !!
Synner667
Austere Emancipator
Mar 4 2007, 09:00 PM
I'd like to point out that body armor/armored drones and big critters are separate issues that one relatively compact handheld firearm is not likely to solve even at very close range. For armored targets, you want high velocity projectiles with a small frontal area, while against trolls and such you want very heavy bullets that crush as large a hole as possible. The only way to get both is absolutely massive, extremely dense, hardened core bullets at high velocities -- basically large caliber magnum rifles -- and those just don't make sense for human-sized combatants out of what is still basically a handgun.
Right now, 7.62x51mm rifles are better weapons against armored targets than any production handgun, including monstrosities like the .460 and .500 S&W revolvers. If armor gets harder, the obvious counter is to tune up long arms -- not handguns, which are by their nature far less capable of dealing with armor. It's also not very likely to run into very heavily armored targets at extremely close quarters, so there's not much call for a particularly compact, powerful armor piercing weapon. So militaries will mostly keep going in the direction they're moving in now: high velocity ammunition with extremely hard and dense, probably subcaliber cores for all rifle-caliber weapons, and let handguns be crap against armor.
The one use I can think of for VHPs in a military is for units that may be forced to engage big critters (trolls etc.) in close quarters, and are big and strong enough themselves to handle handguns in the .440 Cor-Bon - .500 S&W range without trouble. This would allow them to carry both a long-range, accurate, potentially effective armor piercing weapon, like a battle rifle in 7.62x51mm or similar, and the VHP, and be capable of engaging a wide variety of targets in different conditions without having to carry two or more long guns.
For trolls in the military, I think the first thing they'd do is outfit M2HB HMGs with rifle stocks and grips and wield those as battle rifles. Should they be forced to engage in CQB, I suppose handguns or shortened carbines in hefty calibers would come in handy -- but I don't see those happening other than as custom pieces one at a time or in very small numbers unless some military actually had a whole lot of trolls, which is unlikely for most conventional national militaries.
All new handguns designs for trolls, if they came about, would most likely be driven solely by private demand, just all handguns beyond .45 ACP are in the real world.
[Edit].44 Remington Magnum, benchmark, rather large and deep holes, poor performance against any kind of armor:
240gr bullet at 1400fps with 21 grains of propellant from a 3lb gun = 15.9ft-lbs of recoil energy at 18.5fps.
.500 S&W, seriously big and seriously deep holes (has been successfully used for hunting elephants), will penetrate soft body armor ca. 2007 but largely useless against rigid body or vehicle armor:
440gr bullet at 1650fps with 42grs of propellant from a 4.5lb gun = 50.6ft-lbs of recoil energy at 26.9fps.
.338 Lapua Magnum, big and deep holes, will penetrate any body armor ca. 2007, can threaten any light AFVs with dedicated AP rounds:
250gr bullet at 2750fps with 95grs of propellant from a hypothetical 4.5lb VHP = 92.3 ft-lbs @ 36.3fps
.416 Weatherby Magnum, holes as big and deep as .500 S&W with solid projectiles, will penetrate armor at least as well as .338 Lapua:
400gr @ 2400fps w/ 115grs from a hypothetical 5lb VHP = 132ft-lbs @ 41.2fps
So to get good armor penetration along with serious wounding potential against troll-sized critters from a handgun, you'd be getting recoil around twice as hefty as on a .500 S&W revolver. To get wounding potential as good as the most powerful handgun calibers along with good armor penetration, you're looking at recoil close to three times as bad. Plus once you get to that point, your "handgun" is so large that any handling advantage in close quarters is negated anyway, so might as well go for a long range armor piercing rifle and a separate close range, big critter slaying weapon when necessary.[/Edit]
Mistwalker
Mar 4 2007, 10:28 PM
| QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) |
| So to get good armor penetration along with serious wounding potential against troll-sized critters from a handgun, you'd be getting recoil around twice as hefty as on a .500 S&W revolver. To get wounding potential as good as the most powerful handgun calibers along with good armor penetration, you're looking at recoil close to three times as bad. Plus once you get to that point, your "handgun" is so large that any handling advantage in close quarters is negated anyway, so might as well go for a long range armor piercing rifle and a separate close range, big critter slaying weapon when necessary. |
Hmm, does that translate to treating VHP recoil as heavy weapons?
Austere Emancipator
Mar 4 2007, 10:45 PM
If you intend for them to do as much damage as Sniper Rifles do in canon SR (either 3rd or 4th edition, I think), then absolutely yes, along with the damage dealing effects from Cannon Companion or something similar. To get that kind of ballistics from a compact handgun you need a ridiculously powerful cartridge, and that means absolutely punishing recoil.
If you just want to make them do about as much damage as a shotguns while making them very heavy and bulky for handguns, just double recoil is perhaps enough. As long as all the other potential balancing factors are there.
nezumi
Mar 4 2007, 10:47 PM
The problem is "heavy weapons recoil" is sort of silly anyway because of how recoil is calculated. If you're firing an SS weapon (which these pistols would likely be), you'd never suffer recoil anyway. Remember also that "heavy weapons recoil" only doubles uncompensated recoil, so if you have a single point of recoil compensation, you still don't suffer any ill-effects. The only point that it becomes a problem is if you're using the "sawed-off assault rifle" suggested earlier.
Austere Emancipator
Mar 4 2007, 11:20 PM
1) Don't allow recoil compensation on these guns. Problem solved.

2) In SR3, 12S Heavy Weapon without a gyro stabilization unit (and no, a cyberarm one doesn't count) = ouch. That's 6L Stun for every shot fired, and with double recoil you also need 2 successes on a TN 6 knockdown test not to fall on your ass. A 10S Heavy Weapon is just about bearable if you've got a very high Body, but beyond that it gets really harsh.
Darkest Angel
Mar 4 2007, 11:29 PM
Ok, I've already countered your arguments, but since you summarised your arguments, here's my summarised counters:
| QUOTE |
| * There will be approximately 60 million trolls in the world. If the same portion of trolls want guns as with humans, then that is a very large market. In fact, trolls probably buy slightly more guns per capita than humans, but this isn't critical to the point. |
Of those 60 million trolls (personally I think far fewer based on average lifespan, the decimation caused by VITAS and various civil strifes. At the very least 2/3 of them, just as at least 3/4 of the worlds population today are - are going to be more concerned about where they're getting fresh water and the days meal from than whether they can get a gun customed to their fist. Please, do not think the whole 6th world is anything like New Seattle, so of the 20 million left in the 'developed' world, given trolls high infant mortality, you probably have at best 12 million adults, and what proportion are going to show an interest in such a weapon? Going by todays sales figures for todays 'Heavy Pistols', not many. That gives you a tiny niche private market. The military market you can pretty much rule out through lack of sidearm usage by all but spec ops and officers - trolls anywhere will find a glass ceiling in both places. The security and police market are pretty similar, although greater use of pistols could see some argument but there are definate standardisation issues, especially where security and police firms do not get through anything like as much ammo or ammo varieties as the military.
| QUOTE |
| * Trolls cannot use normal sized pistols, therefore manufacturers must already be catering to trolls with customised weapons, or else trolls do not use pistols. |
They do, at a 25% premium. That's a big premium, and demonstrates perfectly the lack of demand from trolls that exists. If demand was as large as you claim, they would be no need for a premium.
| QUOTE |
| * Unlike in the present day, there may be a greater application for stopping power in 2070, what with the prevalence of body armour, cyber, trolls and infrantry often replaced with drones. This is a point in favour of producing demand for such weapons. |
Where units are expecting to engage such opponents, those units are going to be overwhelmingly human, and thus kitted out with appropriate weapons usable by humans, such as Assault Rifles, Light Machine Guns, and even Light or Medium Rocket Launchers. The prevalence of the underbarreled grenade launcher coming as standard on the three major assault rifles, the Alpha, M22 and AK97 says as much.
| QUOTE |
| * Further to the last point, urban environments are also much more heavily armed and armoured, meaning civillian use (which I see as the biggest market) may also want such weapons |
This is my point though, the civilian troll population is exactly going to be the biggest market for such weapons, but at the same time, the civilian market is also the smallest market for firearms, it's pocket change compared to military and security demand. So, by making a weapon purely for civilians you are targeting a fringe audience, which fair enough for humans is a decent sized market, hense the array of Light and Hold Out pistols available. It's still a fringe market though for what the arms dealers churn out most. Targetting civilian trolls is as I say, targetting the 1% fringe of an already fringe market.
| QUOTE |
| * Regardless of need, there is a prestige and status reason. Guns are pretty much the ultimate penis substitute. |
Since when does a troll need a penis substitute?

Seriously though, that's no exactly going to shape greater demand, it just says a lot about the troll buying it.
| QUOTE |
| * There are no supply reasons why VHPs can't be distributed and no significant manufacturing reasons, either. |
Sure, they could shift the production line to make it, it's all computerised anyway - but you need demand to justify supply.
Wounded Ronin
Mar 5 2007, 12:47 AM
| QUOTE (HullBreach) |
| QUOTE (knasser @ Mar 4 2007, 02:51 PM) | [*]Regardless of need, there is a prestige and status reason. Guns are pretty much the ultimate penis substitute. |
Sweet, this makes me like a hentai tentacle monster!
|
[TENTACLE MONSTER MENACING ROCK RIFF]
DURNERDURNERDURNERNERRR, DURNERDURNERDURNERNERR!
[/TENTACLE MONSTER MENACING ROCK RIFF]
Darkest Angel:
Consider the following possibility.
Out of all the trolls in the world one of them manages, in spite of many obstacles, to become a successful businessman.
Being an aggressive and self reliant type, and having dealt with a lot of extreme harassment in his time, he decides to make a company which specalizes in selling defensive "handguns" in .50 BMG to trolls. He has enough capital to start this company and, even if business isn't great, he keeps running it because of idealistic reasons.
Now are you happy?
Mistwalker
Mar 5 2007, 12:51 AM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
| Of those 60 million trolls (personally I think far fewer based on average lifespan, the decimation caused by VITAS and various civil strifes. At the very least 2/3 of them, just as at least 3/4 of the worlds population today are - are going to be more concerned about where they're getting fresh water and the days meal from than whether they can get a gun customed to their fist. Please, do not think the whole 6th world is anything like New Seattle, so of the 20 million left in the 'developed' world, given trolls high infant mortality, you probably have at best 12 million adults, and what proportion are going to show an interest in such a weapon? Going by todays sales figures for todays 'Heavy Pistols', not many. That gives you a tiny niche private market. The military market you can pretty much rule out through lack of sidearm usage by all but spec ops and officers - trolls anywhere will find a glass ceiling in both places. The security and police market are pretty similar, although greater use of pistols could see some argument but there are definate standardisation issues, especially where security and police firms do not get through anything like as much ammo or ammo varieties as the military. |
Where are you getting your facts from?
High infant mortality rate?
You have changed 60 million to 12 million with a wave of your hand.
Even with glass ceilings, a lot of security, bodyguards, which do carry sidearms.
You ignore the fact that trolls band together, for safety, and are more likely to get the biggest damn pistol that they can. The VHP would be concealable on a troll, would take out any predator in the barrens, armored Humanis goon, etc..
As for the military, well, what about the troll kingdom's military? I could see them all armed with VHPs, if nothing else, just to torque off the little people.
knasser
Mar 5 2007, 07:31 AM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
| Ok, I've already countered your arguments |
Neither I, nor several other posters here agree with that. To me, the points you make translate into a somewhat higher cost and availability (but not exorbitant custom costs). I don't see them as strong enough to mean you can't buy or order a VHP and ammunition.
You think world population of 6billion is too low. It's more than that today and left unchecked would be massively more by 2070. I picked 6bn to take account of VITAS and the degree of unrest. People can argue that it's higher, but not lower, I think. You keep making generalised statements and whitling away these numbers to nothing. And you take small things, like a 25% cost increase, and see them as major disincentives. If I pay £500 for a gun, I think I might pay £625 for one that suits me better. It's the same magnitude.
X-Kalibur
Mar 5 2007, 07:33 AM
| QUOTE (Austere Emancipator) |
If you intend for them to do as much damage as Sniper Rifles do in canon SR (either 3rd or 4th edition, I think), then absolutely yes, along with the damage dealing effects from Cannon Companion or something similar. To get that kind of ballistics from a compact handgun you need a ridiculously powerful cartridge, and that means absolutely punishing recoil.
If you just want to make them do about as much damage as a shotguns while making them very heavy and bulky for handguns, just double recoil is perhaps enough. As long as all the other potential balancing factors are there. |
Speaking on this and on tentacle rape hentai monsters... anyone ever seen Wicked City? Now THAT is a VHP. I'd take it or one of the revolvers from Trigun any day.
HullBreach
Mar 5 2007, 01:44 PM
| QUOTE (X-Kalibur) |
| Speaking on this and on tentacle rape hentai monsters... anyone ever seen Wicked City? Now THAT is a VHP. I'd take it or one of the revolvers from Trigun any day. |
Check out the 'Earth Shaker' revolver Leon uses in the original Bubblegum Crisis. Thing holds three .60cal rounds and IIRC weighs like 6.5lbs unloaded.
Darkest Angel
Mar 5 2007, 05:39 PM
| QUOTE |
Where are you getting your facts from?
High infant mortality rate?
You have changed 60 million to 12 million with a wave of your hand. |
Well you seem to have forgotten that there is a planet outside of North America and Europe. Today, 3/4 of the worlds population lives in the third world, I can't see that changing much in SR, it seems pretty reasonable to me to wipe at least 60% of the total population off having any interest in a weapon best suited to urban personal protection. 12 million is a conservative estimate.
High infant mortality rate is from the BBB, and is predominantly down to the majority of trolls living below the poverty line in slums. Their 45 year life expectation speaks volumes ney?
| QUOTE |
| Even with glass ceilings, a lot of security, bodyguards, which do carry sidearms. |
True, but they're pretty much invariably subsidiaries of major corps and will carry weapons made by said parent corp. You seem to be in agreement that a VHP would be a special thing brought in on a tiny scale for the public market - corps don't buy into those kinds of things.
| QUOTE |
| You ignore the fact that trolls band together, for safety, and are more likely to get the biggest damn pistol that they can. The VHP would be concealable on a troll, would take out any predator in the barrens, armored Humanis goon, etc.. |
No, they're most likely to get the biggest damn gun they can get away with, that's going to be shotgun, sawn off or otherwise.
| QUOTE |
| As for the military, well, what about the troll kingdom's military? I could see them all armed with VHPs, if nothing else, just to torque off the little |
Not really, I see them armed with Assault Rifles and LMGs like everyone elses army. Pistols suck on the battlefield, end of.
Someone already said they regarded the Super Warhawk and Hatamoto as VHPs anyway, in which case there are two such niche market weapons available. Given that each weapon in the books cover a multitude of copies and variants, you have your niche weapons. I voted that they were already covered and see no reason to introduce anything 'extra'. Personally, I've never seen a player take either, because of their limited ammo capacity and SS nature - the examples that have been put forward as contemporary VHPs suffer similar problems. To me it seems you're just out for a better pistol for your character, if your GM is ok with that then fine. NIMG. I'm going to leave it with that, because this is going round and round and round.
knasser
Mar 5 2007, 06:32 PM
| QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
| I'm going to leave it with that, because this is going round and round and round. |
Agreed as far as I'm concerned. I'll leave it to any others who want to discuss remaining points as I don't know much about firearms themselves (guess that makes me the schoolgirl in this tentacle monster analogy. :-/ ).
You (Darkest Angel) may not agree with me, but I'm satisfied you understand what I'm saying and that's as much as I ever ask for. For my part, I understand what you're saying but am not convinced it's sufficient for VHPs not to exist. I believe your points would translate into mere rises in cost and availability rating (but not hugely so).
I'm done, here.
Cheers,
-K.
hyzmarca
Mar 5 2007, 06:37 PM
A newborn troll has a body of 6, which is better than most adult human athletes.
With six times the disease resistance of newborn humans and elves, infant mortality rates for trolls should be 1/6 that of humans and elves in similar conditions, 1/3 that of dwarves, and 2/3 that of orks. All things being equal, troll children have the greatest potential survivability in adverse conditions.
Heck, a troll kid is highly likely to survive being mauled by a lion, stabbed with a combat knife, or shot point-blank with a light pistol.
That is one of the reasons that trolls are so scary. They can survive in conditions that would devastate a human population.
Of course, there will be infant mortality amongst trolls, even in posh affluent neighborhoods. The laws of probability demand it. Even so, the per-capita troll infant mortality rate in a given area will be far lower than the per-capita infant mortality rate of any other race in that area.
Moon-Hawk
Mar 5 2007, 07:04 PM
While I might disagree with some of your exact numbers, I completely agree with your overall point, hyzmarca.
Garrowolf
Mar 5 2007, 10:11 PM
Ok it seems like we are talking about different things here. We already have heavy pistol sizes for humans. I was thinking of a VHP as using rifle rounds and not pistol rounds. The guns would be very solid and heavy. They might be more uncommon but the rifle rounds would be normally available. Only a trolls and heavily cybered would be able to fire something with that kind of recoil.
Synner667
Mar 11 2007, 03:27 AM
| QUOTE (HullBreach) |
| QUOTE (X-Kalibur @ Mar 5 2007, 02:33 AM) | | Speaking on this and on tentacle rape hentai monsters... anyone ever seen Wicked City? Now THAT is a VHP. I'd take it or one of the revolvers from Trigun any day. |
Check out the 'Earth Shaker' revolver Leon uses in the original Bubblegum Crisis. Thing holds three .60cal rounds and IIRC weighs like 6.5lbs unloaded.
|
Hi,
Cyberpunk 2020 mentions a .666 calibre pistol in one of their supplements !!
I think the Earthshaker pistol is mentioned in one of the Bubblegum Crisis RPG books, and is chambered for rifle rounds.
Peter
PBTHHHHT
Mar 11 2007, 04:16 AM
| QUOTE (hyzmarca) |
| Of course, there will be infant mortality amongst trolls, even in posh affluent neighborhoods. The laws of probability demand it. Even so, the per-capita troll infant mortality rate in a given area will be far lower than the per-capita infant mortality rate of any other race in that area. |
Depending on the parents, especially if they're human parents in posh affluent neighborhoods, then yeah, I can see higher per capita troll infant mortality rates.

Of course, I may be wrong and troll babies aren't born from human parents but instead they goblinize during puberty. But if the former can happen, then I can see a rash of SIDS happening for the troll babies for some reason...
Synner667
Mar 11 2007, 04:21 AM
| QUOTE (PBTHHHHT) |
| QUOTE (hyzmarca @ Mar 5 2007, 01:37 PM) | | Of course, there will be infant mortality amongst trolls, even in posh affluent neighborhoods. The laws of probability demand it. Even so, the per-capita troll infant mortality rate in a given area will be far lower than the per-capita infant mortality rate of any other race in that area. |
Depending on the parents, especially if they're human parents in posh affluent neighborhoods, then yeah, I can see higher per capita troll infant mortality rates.  Of course, I may be wrong and troll babies aren't born from human parents but instead they goblinize during puberty. But if the former can happen, then I can see a rash of SIDS happening for the troll babies for some reason... |
In a similar vein..
There was a large number of 'miscarriages' in the upperclass families in SR England - Apparently.
Peter
PBTHHHHT
Mar 11 2007, 04:54 AM
back to topic, for VHP... how about the good old contender line?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_Center_ArmsGranted it's not a semi automatic pistol.
Cray74
Mar 11 2007, 12:13 PM
| QUOTE (KarmaInferno) |
Why am I suddenly reminded about the weapons rules for Underground?
The ones that feature handguns in the 50mm range?
-karma |
I think the pistols topped out at 30mm, but you could get 50mm rifles, with speciality 75mm options.
hyzmarca
Mar 11 2007, 07:40 PM
Trolls are usually born from troll parents and usually goblinize from human parents. Sometimes trolls goblinize from troll parents but the are never born from human parents, which should be a relief to human women everywhere. I don't believe that the human pelivs is wide enough to make that work.
Convenient late-term miscarriages and suspicious SIDs cases are generally reserved for Elves and Dwarves.
PBTHHHHT
Mar 11 2007, 11:53 PM
that's what I thought. Ah well, SIDS then for elves and dwarves... and well, the kids who goblinize, I guess they're still learning their new bodies so they might 'accidently' fall down those stairs and break their necks...
Garrowolf
Mar 12 2007, 12:51 AM
I thought that goblinization occurred either at birth or at puberty. Your not going to have them pop up at 4. (though that might be funny

)
PBTHHHHT
Mar 12 2007, 01:59 AM
oh no, I meant when they hit puberty too. you know, take the kid out for fishing and such and they happen to drown in 3' of water for some reason... yikes. ok, enough of these bad evil thoughts about evil parents who can't handle their children being metas.
sunnyside
Mar 12 2007, 05:23 PM
Ok again. In, to my knowledge, each SR system the biggest handgun does MORE damage than a full length rifle. MORE not LESS.
Therefore SR handgun manufacturers already went past "chambering rifle rounds in handguns" and kept going. In fact, since in each SR chopping down a rifle to SMG length reduces the damage code to that of an SMG (go on look up the AK carbine), it means that whatever they have in handguns now has to squint to see back to the time of only having rifle rounds in those chambers. Similarly the biggest handguns do more damage than the biggest shotguns reduced to handgun lengths (At least in SR3 in the cannon companion).
If you want something for trolls/sammies let them have a shotgun that's sawed down to only a 14 inch barrel. To my knowledge in real life that still gives you nearly all the power from the shotgun. Going much shorter starts eating in to velocity. But a troll should be able to hide a ~16 inch weapon on their person. Just remember to reduce the range.
And don't forget to add house rules for the recoil those "regular" heavies should have. SR lets a toddler fire a ten gauge without a penalty because it makes it easy on book keeping. But if your players want bigger guns make them realize the ones they have aren't .22's. Or even .50's probably.
EDIT: Just remembered when my little brother first fired a shotgun. He didn't snug it up sufficiantly against his shoulder and didn't spread out his legs right. The results were hilarious!
X-Kalibur
Mar 12 2007, 08:03 PM
SR4 Ares Predator 15 round detachable magazine, 5P damage -1AP, Semi automatic.
SR4 Super Warhawk 6 round Cylinder, 6P damage -2AP, Single Shot, may not mount a silencer.
SR4 Ruger 100 5 round internal magazine, 7P Damage -1AP, Semi-automatic
SR4 Remington 990 8 round internal magazine, 7P Damage -1AP (for slugs), Semi automatic.
SR4 Ares Alpha 32 Round detachable magazine, 6P damage -1AP integral 2 points of recoil compensation, Semi automatic, burst fire, and full auto capable.
Where was the Heavy Pistol out performing the rifle again? Nowhere.
nezumi
Mar 12 2007, 11:55 PM
3rd edition:
Ares Pred 9M
Super Warhawk 10M
AK-97 8M
HK227 (SMG) 7M
Remington 750 7S
So a predator has a bigger round than an AK or an SMG, but presumably around the same size or smaller than a hunting rifle.