Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: What 'ware would you get?
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
FuelDrop
Ok, you have been granted ONE piece of fully kitted out 'ware, in delta grade and max rating. What would you pick?

I'm seriously tempted by cybereyes, personally, though cerebral boosters would be badass too.
Draco18s
Dunno if I want my shiny eye gems scooped out with a melon ball and replaced with digital cameras.

Or having my brain messed with.

The benefits are tempting though.
Raiden
Most tempting to me... muscle replacement or synaptic boosters. Hard choice tho.
Jaid
sleep regulator.
Raiden
QUOTE (Jaid @ Aug 3 2013, 12:44 AM) *
sleep regulator.

The one from SR4. .... extremely tempting also
Ryu
Suprathyroid gland (SR4), as it has only benefits besides having to spend more on food.
quentra
Wired 3, duh. It just makes you better than other people.
Umidori
The OXSYS Cybergill is a very high level contender for me. Oddly enough, it's hands-down superior to the Gills bioware, which is kind of the opposite of the normal situation.

Jaid already mentioned it, but yes, the Sleep Regulator is awfully tempting, if we're allowing Bioware. And as bad as it may sound, the Dietware cosmetic bioware could be great as well - although not anywhere near as nice as the Sustenance adept power.

Ooh, also - Pain Editor. Because once it's made you aware that, yes, you just wounded yourself, pain doesn't really serve much further purpose.

Decisions, decisions...

~Umi
Skynet
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 09:45 AM) *
(...)
Ooh, also - Pain Editor. Because once it's made you aware that, yes, you just wounded yourself, pain doesn't really serve much further purpose.

Decisions, decisions...

~Umi


Something along the lines of "Pain is the bodys way of saying 'slow down'" wink.gif (Although it should stop yelling that in my ear after a while.)

As for the topic: Mnemonic enhancers might be a nice choice.
Elfenlied
For me, it's one of those:
Synaptic Booster R3 (obvious reasons)
Tailored Pheromones R3 (again, obvious reasons)
Léonization (not at this time, but at a later date)
Skillwires (assuming skillsofts come with it)
kerbarian
Cerebral booster, no question. Second place would be a competition between tailored pheromones, sleep regulator, and mnemonic enhancer.

Being fast or strong or seeing in the dark would be fun, but I'm much less likely to get involved in gunfights or espionage than the characters I play smile.gif.

Actually, a cranial cyberdeck is an interesting choice, assuming it would let you easily hack every network, account, and machine on the planet, but I think that one's kinda cheating.
Umidori
Tailored Pheromones is too skeazy for me. I don't like manipulating people, especially by playing on leftover instincts that they are seldom even aware of. If I can't win someone over in an argument with reasoning, or befriend someone based purely on who I am, I neither want nor deserve to do so.

A Mnemonic Enhancer or Cerebral booster is nice, but human memory and intellect is already potentially amazing - all it takes is training. Ditto with things like Muscle Toner and Augmentation, and to be honest, the Dietware I mentioned in my previous post.

No, when I'm really honest with myself the 'ware I would want most is stuff that allows me to do things that are otherwise impossible. I could be strong and fit without 'ware, I could have a sharp memory as well, heck, I could even learn to block out pain. But things like being able to breathe water indefinitel and being able to get a full night's sleep out of only three hours are things my biology simply cannot attain, and hence would be incalculably more valuable than most any other 'ware choice.

~Umi
Lionhearted
Is it cheating to say MBW system? (as it's essentially two implants in one) load it up with a bunch of activesofts and you're good to go...
Barring that a datajack and a huge supply of know/linguasofts
Umidori
I dunno, man. MBW is freaky tech.

I mean, are you really cool with operating in a state of constant seizure controlled only by the system's software? Glob forbid something goes wrong, because you'll be reduced to a pile of twitching flesh and wires, and the best medical help in the world might not be able to set you right again.

Also, besides the awesome factor, they don't seem terribly practical. Okay, yeah, you have incredible reflexes. What exactly are you gonna use them for? wink.gif

Not that my choices are all that much more valuable. "Oh, gills? That's nice, I guess, if you just want to sit under the surface of a pool or whatever for hours at a time, not doing anything interesting." nyahnyah.gif

Which, actually, I would love to do. I'm weird like that. I imagine it'd be pretty damn awesome to fall asleep underwater as well. Complete comfort, assuming the temperature is proper.

~Umi
Lionhearted
With Cyberware you can always turn it off when you don't use it Umi, but yeah MBW is risky biz... there's something about moving at moving at the speed of reflex though...
Umidori
Yeah, that something is called whiplash.

Or ruptured ligaments.

Or detached retinas.

Or shear-fractured carpals.

I could go on.

~Umi
Elfenlied
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 09:31 AM) *
Tailored Pheromones is too skeazy for me. I don't like manipulating people, especially by playing on leftover instincts that they are seldom even aware of. If I can't win someone over in an argument with reasoning, or befriend someone based purely on who I am, I neither want nor deserve to do so.


Hmm, that's the reason why I want it in the first place nyahnyah.gif

Then again, I work as a corporate consultant, and most of the time convincing people to make the right choices is more important than being popular.
Umidori
Corporate scum! Die!

*Pink Mohawks all over the floor*

~Umi
Sendaz
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 04:31 AM) *
Tailored Pheromones is too skeazy for me. I don't like manipulating people, especially by playing on leftover instincts that they are seldom even aware of. If I can't win someone over in an argument with reasoning, or befriend someone based purely on who I am, I neither want nor deserve to do so.

~Umi

It's just another tool, not mind control and no different than dressing appropriately for a meeting. If you are dressed like a street bum, you are not going to win many debates with a person as your appearance will nominally rule you out as a valid source and most won't even bother to listen. Likewise if you smell like you just crawled out of the sewer, see how many new friends you can make at a social gathering. wink.gif

Umidori
There's a difference between the social convention of "appropriate" dress, and the act of purposefully tapping into primal instincts to manipulate people. Clothing and fashion is entirely cultural - wearing a white dress to a funeral is tabboo in our culture, but in Korea it's the customary mourning color in the same way black is ours. We only wear suits and ties for meetings because our culture has trained us to, not because it has any inherent value.

In contrast, pheremones affect a person at a biological level, which is a level humans typically don't interact on socially. Pheromones are drugs. Selectively dispersing them into the air around you in order to affect the physiological functioning of other people and make them more susceptible to your influence is just as nefarious as slipping Rohypnol into someone's drink.

There's also a difference between not wearing human pheromones for the purpose of manipulating people, and being unclean. On that note, I do hope that you wash yourself for other reasons than just wanting to manipulate other people. nyahnyah.gif

~Umi
LurkerOutThere
The humble datajack. DNI would be extremely useful to me

Runners up are any kind of spinal replacement (so MBw or Wr) or sleep regulator.
Sendaz
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 04:38 AM) *
There's a difference between the social convention of "appropriate" dress, and the act of purposefully tapping into primal instincts to manipulate people. Clothing and fashion is entirely cultural - wearing a white dress to a funeral is tabboo in our culture, but in Korea it's the customary mourning color in the same way black is ours. We only wear suits and ties for meetings because our culture has trained us to, not because it has any inherent value.

And when you wear that suit to a business meeting you are tapping into a social instinct to manipulate people. Go to a power meeting wearing t-shirt, ripped jeans and sneakers and see the difference in how they treat you. Some mavericks can pull it off, but the majority of the time you will be dismissed as not being serious regardless of whatever skillset / genius you might possess. It is still manipulation, just on another level and often times this is stronger than what you will get from the biological level pheromone.

QUOTE
In contrast, pheremones affect a person at a biological level, which is a level humans typically don't interact on socially. Pheromones are drugs. Selectively dispersing them into the air around you in order to affect the physiological functioning of other people and make them more susceptible to your influence is just as nefarious as slipping Rohypnol into someone's drink.

There is a bit of difference between pheromones and a roofie and if you can not distinquish between a scent that can trigger reactions from a drug that flat out impairs higher thought processes it will be impossible to hold any discussion on that point. You still have some say in the matter of the first case, practically none in the second.

Also does this mean you disapprove of makeup and perfumes? While a perfume does not necessarily contain pheromones, it can trigger reactions and influence people along similar lines. Interesting tidbit, when a woman wears vanilla fragrance men generally perceive her to be 10 lbs lighter than she sctually is, research has differing opinions as to the why, but small things like this all add up.
Elfenlied
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 10:38 AM) *
On that note, I do hope that you wash yourself for other reasons than just wanting to manipulate other people. nyahnyah.gif


I heard people only wash themselves in the hope of getting laid nyahnyah.gif
Sendaz
QUOTE (Elfenlied @ Aug 3 2013, 06:10 AM) *
I heard people only wash themselves in the hope of getting laid nyahnyah.gif

and that too could be manipulation....though I think they will need far more help than a bath at that stage. nyahnyah.gif

as for cyber I like the sense enhancing stuff, but it will depend on the campaign.
FuelDrop
QUOTE (Sendaz @ Aug 3 2013, 06:17 PM) *
and that too could be manipulation....though I think they will need far more help than a bath at that stage. nyahnyah.gif

as for cyber I like the sense enhancing stuff, but it will depend on the campaign.

The campaign is RL. smile.gif

Yeah, my GM keeps screwing me over on monetary rewards as well. I am so kicking myself for not going an adept nyahnyah.gif
Cain
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 01:38 AM) *
In contrast, pheremones affect a person at a biological level, which is a level humans typically don't interact on socially. Pheromones are drugs. Selectively dispersing them into the air around you in order to affect the physiological functioning of other people and make them more susceptible to your influence is just as nefarious as slipping Rohypnol into someone's drink.

*puts on nurse's hat*

Um, no.

First of all, they're not a drug. A drug is something you take. A pheromone is something you excrete. They're nothing alike.

*takes off nurse's hat, puts on psychologist's hat*

Second, the degree to which pheromones affect human behavior is pretty low. Sure, it's one factor, but there are many others that are much more powerful. Just listen to powerful public speakers: they control an audience through voice and inflection alone. You don't need to be in the same room as them, you don't even need to see them. Vocal ability is powerful.

Third, Rohypnol is a sedative, not an aphrodisiac. It knocks people out and erases their memory. A pheromone is a chemical marker. All it does is identify something as "yours". Even if pheromones were aphrodisiacs-- which they are *NOT*-- they still wouldn't be anywhere near the same league as Rohypnol.
Stahlseele
If i had to chose, it'd be one of these in this order.
Sleep Regulator.
Mnemonic Enhancer.
Tricked out Cyber-Eyes.
Skillwire-Set or MBW from 4th Edition.
Lionhearted
QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 12:54 PM) *
*takes off nurse's hat, puts on psychologist's hat*

Shrinks wear hats?

QUOTE
Second, the degree to which pheromones affect human behavior is pretty low. Sure, it's one factor, but there are many others that are much more powerful...
... A pheromone is a chemical marker. All it does is identify something as "yours".

Pheromones can have rather strong influence... Not with humans, but among plants and insects pheromones can do some strange things...
I think the idea is to superimpose those kind of pheromones to humans... Which is well, not more farfetched then a lot of soft science...
Umidori
QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 04:54 AM) *
First of all, they're not a drug. A drug is something you take. A pheromone is something you excrete. They're nothing alike.

Clearly you're not an actual nurse. (Full disclosure, neither am I, but hey! I don't go around implying I am, except in the case of obvious facetiousness!) wink.gif

Most chemicals are drugs in the right amounts. Most chemicals are also food in smaller amounts, or poisons in larger amounts. When a person chews or eats the bark of a willow tree we call it part of their "diet", but when they take a prepared dosage of the acetylsalicylic acid that the bark contains we call it a "drug", and of course if you inject a massively overconcentrated dose into someone's bloodstream, we say that you've "poisoned" them. But it all amounts to the same thing - a specific substance is introduced to the body and has a direct affect on its operation.

Even if you were to insist upon distinguishing between excreted local substances and ingested foreign ones, Tailored Pheromones would still qualify as a drug because the person being affected is not the one excreting the pheromones - the pheromones in question are entirely foreign to their body, and thus would qualify as a drug. There is no appreciable difference between extracting acetylsalicylic acid from a willow tree and having it be swallowed by someone, and extracting (and possibly synthesizing) pheromones in one person, and then dispersing them through the air to be inhaled by another.

QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 04:54 AM) *
Second, the degree to which pheromones affect human behavior is pretty low.

It's not, actually, but that's alright. Even if it was, the point of the Tailored Pheromones 'ware is to increase the potency of the pheromones and their effects substantially.

QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 04:54 AM) *
Sure, it's one factor, but there are many others that are much more powerful. Just listen to powerful public speakers: they control an audience through voice and inflection alone. You don't need to be in the same room as them, you don't even need to see them. Vocal ability is powerful.

What, exactly, does this have to do with the morality of willingly attempting to manipulate a person's behavior or state of mind via chemicals?

QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 04:54 AM) *
Third, Rohypnol is a sedative, not an aphrodisiac. It knocks people out and erases their memory. A pheromone is a chemical marker. All it does is identify something as "yours". Even if pheromones were aphrodisiacs-- which they are *NOT*-- they still wouldn't be anywhere near the same league as Rohypnol.

I know what Rohypnol is, and what it is not, and I was not implying that it was anything other than what it is. The point I was making was regarding the morality of the action and the motivations behind it, not the physical mechanisms in play. If you are willing to secretly expose someone else to a foreign compound in order to more effectively control their behavior to benefit your goals or suit your whims, that's kind of abominable. The only difference between secretly drugging someone in order to rape them and secretly drugging them get them to be more susceptible to influence is a matter of scope and scale.

That said, I concede it was an extreme example - in fact, that was the point. They're not equivalent immoral acts, but they're comparable, which is what the juxtaposition was meant to bring attention to. A more fitting comparison might be a pickup artist buying someone drinks in order to lower their inhibitions - except in that case the target is actually aware of the fact that they're being exposed to a drug, and they can choose not to partake. Not so with Tailored Pheromones - they're hidden and undetected, and cannot be avoided.

~Umi
Cain
QUOTE
Clearly you're not an actual nurse.

Actually, I am. Or was, technically, I'm retired.

QUOTE
Most chemicals are drugs in the right amounts.

Not even close. All chemicals are just compounds, mixtures of elements. Considering all the possible combinations available to the periodic table, surprisingly few of them are biologically active and/or helpful. Certainly not "most chemicals".

(Yes, I'm being pedantic. No, I'm not going to let a misstep slide when someone attacks my qualifications with something they should have learned in high school chemistry.)
QUOTE
Most chemicals are also food in smaller amounts, or poisons in larger amounts. When a person chews or eats the bark of a willow tree we call it part of their "diet", but when they take a prepared dosage of the acetylsalicylic acid that the bark contains we call it a "drug", and of course if you inject a massively overconcentrated dose into someone's bloodstream, we say that you've "poisoned" them. But it all amounts to the same thing - a specific substance is introduced to the body and has a direct affect on its operation.

No, no, no. Willowbark isn't regulated by the FDA, but there are specialized doctors and nurses who prescribe the stuff. They're called naturopaths. It's still a drug you take, since there's no chemical difference between the raw form and the processed version. Oh, and just because: most chemicals aren't food. There's only three chemicals that are food: proteins, carbohydrates, and fat. (Alcohol too, but it's an edge case.) Everything else is everything else, as any nurse would tell you after passing Nutrition 101.

By your example, water is a drug. Too much water can kill you (google the story on the Wii if you want an example, I'm too lazy to do it for you), and it's a chemical "dihydrogen monoxide". Sorry, but if you try and tell me giving someone water is equal to giving someone rohypnol (they're both drugs, right?) then I'm going to laugh.
QUOTE
Even if you were to insist upon distinguishing between excreted local substances and ingested foreign ones, Tailored Pheromones would still qualify as a drug because the person being affected is not the one excreting the pheromones - the pheromones in question are entirely foreign to their body, and thus would qualify as a drug. There is no appreciable difference between extracting acetylsalicylic acid from a willow tree and having it be swallowed by someone, and extracting (and possibly synthesizing) pheromones in one person, and then dispersing them through the air to be inhaled by another.

You have got to be kidding me. First of all, pheromones are natural. People excrete them all the time, literally. Again, natural isn't always better, but it's basically stuff you sweat. The guy with tailored pheromones is basically putting out more sweat. Your analogy is flawed because people don't normally ingest asprin in a normal environment, but they do absorb pheromones every day. Tailored Pheromones don't introduce anything new, they just add more of what's there.


QUOTE
It's not, actually, but that's alright. Even if it was, the point of the Tailored Pheromones 'ware is to increase the potency of the pheromones and their effects substantially.


*Sigh* Wrong again. This time, I'm just going to point you at a WebMD article on the subject that shows what pheromones do and don't do in regards to human behavior. I'd look up a harder science journal article, but I have the feeling it'd go over your head.

QUOTE
I know what Rohypnol is, and what it is not, and I was not implying that it was anything other than what it is. The point I was making was regarding the morality of the action and the motivations behind it, not the physical mechanisms in play. If you are willing to secretly expose someone else to a foreign compound in order to more effectively control their behavior to benefit your ao,s or suit your whims, that's kind of abominable. The only difference between secretly drugging someone in order to rape them and secretly drugging them get them to be more susceptible to influence is a matter of scope and scale.

You're not secretly drugging them. Pheromones, even in SR4.5/5, simply aren't that powerful. It's just a little more of what your body would already do. To use your analogy, tailored pheromones are the equivalent of switching someone's single drink for a double. They still drink it, and it might give you a mild edge, but nothing spectacular.

Hey, do you remember the 80's when pheromones were the latest craze? Pheromone sprays appeared everywhere, guaranteeing that you would turn into a stud at the push of a button. And for the most part, the sprays delivered on what they promised: huge pheromone releases. Of course, none of them worked, so they soon faded into obscurity. Unfortunately, they didn't fall out of urban myth.

QUOTE
What, exactly, does this have to do with the morality of willingly attempting to manipulate a person's behavior or state of mind via chemicals?

Well, 1) chemicals are not required, and 2) they're not even the best tools for the job. A skilled orator can manipulate millions of people at once, while pheromones can only affect a small room, if you're lucky.

QUOTE
That said, I concede it was an extreme example - in fact, that was the point. They're not equivalent immoral acts, but they're comparable, which is what the juxtaposition was meant to bring attention to. A more fitting comparison might be a pickup artist buying someone drinks in order to lower their inhibitions - except in that case the target is actually aware of the fact that they're being exposed to a drug, and they can choose not to partake. Not so with Tailored Pheromones - they're hidden and undetected, and cannot be avoided.

They're not even comparable. If I buy a lady a drink, and make it a double when she asked for a single, that's maybe mildly immoral but nothing serious. She's still getting what she ordered, and can control the effects herself. If I douse a lady with Rohypnol, I strip away her decision-making ability and her memory, so she can't consent to anything and won't remember what happened. She has no control over that, I've just stripped her control away. That's a whole different world of immoral behavior.

If I approach a lady at the bar tonight, she's *going* to be exposed to my pheromones. Period. No if's, ands, or buts. Now, in 2070, you can control your pheromone output, so you release more of what you normally do. You haven't exposed anybody to anything they wouldn't have encountered anyway, it's just a little more. And quite frankly, that little more isn't a big deal. Exposing someone to something they wouldn't normally encounter-- like Rohypnol-- is far and away different.

Bottom line: Pheromones are NOT mind control! They're not even good aphrodisiacs! They can be a useful aid, but that's about it.
Lionhearted
QUOTE (Cain @ Aug 3 2013, 03:06 PM) *
Bottom line: Pheromones are NOT mind control! They're not even good aphrodisiacs! They can be a useful aid, but that's about it.

Well... Not with humans atleast
Cain
QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Aug 3 2013, 05:10 AM) *
Well... Not with humans atleast

True, but then I'd have to also go into plant pheromones, which are something else altogether. Keep it simple for now.
ShadowDragon8685
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Aug 2 2013, 08:59 PM) *
Ok, you have been granted ONE piece of fully kitted out 'ware, in delta grade and max rating. What would you pick?


Hrm... Just one?

Well...

That depends.

Does an implanted SR4 commlink come with a max-rating, milspec commlink loaded out with programs? Or hell, even a Rating 6 hacker's commlink? Because if so, I just need to use to use the tutorsofts to teach myself a die of the Programming activeskill, program it to wirelessly interface with, say, modern-day wifi protocols (assuming it doesn't have those in a Translate library somewhere,) and all of a sudden I'm the most novahot hacker on the planet.

Because if so, I'd like to go with that option.

If not... Hrm. Sleep regulator's always been high on my wish-fulfillment list of 'ware. Some kind of dietware would probably edge it out, though. A high-grade tailored pheremones would give me a big advantage, too, but probably not enough of one in these days of few face-to-face meetings. (Maybe if it was DXHR's whole C.A.S.I.E. augment, though...)

A Maths SPU would be a really nice choice, too... High-rating cybereyes would be keen, but... Well, I don't do enough to warrant them, really.
Sendaz
QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Aug 3 2013, 07:15 AM) *
Shrinks wear hats?
Yes.

And how does that make you feel? read.gif
Sendaz
Double post
Tanegar
For pure practicality, datajack, assuming we're positing a world in which a 2070s-era datajack can actually connect to the devices I use regularly. For pure awesomeness, it's hard to beat MBW.
Umidori
@Cain

Whelp, I like to think I'm the kind of guy who tries to own up to things when he's wrong, so I'm attempting to do so now. I should definitely try to not post things to Dumpshock in the wee hours of the morning when I haven't slept all night and am not cogent enough to realize what I'm writing is pure drek.

My own core personal philosophy remains unchaged - in general I don't approve of the active manipulation of others for personal gain - but I can at least concede my own poor argumentation, confused reasoning, and lack of supporting evidence in this particular case, and ask you to overlook the fact that I made an idiot of myself. nyahnyah.gif

Cheers.

~Umi
CanRay
Apparently I'm buying Stainless Steel Bone Lacing on the installment plan...
Shortstraw
Canada is too cheap to give you titanium ones?
Cain
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 01:06 PM) *
@Cain

Whelp, I like to think I'm the kind of guy who tries to own up to things when he's wrong, so I'm attempting to do so now. I should definitely try to not post things to Dumpshock in the wee hours of the morning when I haven't slept all night and am not cogent enough to realize what I'm writing is pure drek.

My own core personal philosophy remains unchaged - in general I don't approve of the active manipulation of others for personal gain - but I can at least concede my own poor argumentation, confused reasoning, and lack of supporting evidence in this particular case, and ask you to overlook the fact that I made an idiot of myself. nyahnyah.gif

Cheers.

~Umi

That's very cool of you.
nylanfs
QUOTE (Umidori @ Aug 3 2013, 05:38 AM) *
There's a difference between the social convention of "appropriate" dress, and the act of purposefully tapping into primal instincts to manipulate people.


You mean un-like using extremely attractive spokespeople to sell crap to consumers? smile.gif
Draco18s
QUOTE (nylanfs @ Aug 4 2013, 08:51 AM) *
You mean un-like using extremely attractive spokespeople to sell crap to consumers? smile.gif


Not making this up, a friend of mine repeated something their mother said:
"I'm going to vote for Bush. I like how he looks on TV."
nylanfs
eek.gif WOW
Sendaz
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Aug 4 2013, 09:59 AM) *
Not making this up, a friend of mine repeated something their mother said:
"I'm going to vote for Bush. I like how he looks on TV."

It is truer than you think. The original Nixon/Kennedy debate was one of the first presidential debates to be televised and Nixon's poor appearance, due to a combination of factors including campaigning right up to the last hour and refusing to wear makeup leaving him with a stubble look, did have an impact in the long run.

It is a bit of the industry hypocrisy where a woman's magazine will run articles about being yourself and not falling to peer pressure about weight or beauty and have a wafer thin glamourous fashion model posing on the page opposite who actually has to regularly go and starve herself to keep that particular look because that is what the magazine wants.


Hmmm. An autopurger might be a standard cyberware item for a model. nyahnyah.gif
MADness
Fully tricked put eyes. No more glasses, no more missed moments with my wife and children, better privacy with the display link and my phone, safer driving in all weather situations, and I get to make cool shapes, colors, and such on my eyeball. I would also like the eyeball drone option.
GiraffeShaman
QUOTE
It is truer than you think. The original Nixon/Kennedy debate was one of the first presidential debates to be televised and Nixon's poor appearance, due to a combination of factors including campaigning right up to the last hour and refusing to wear makeup leaving him with a stubble look, did have an impact in the long run.


And don't forget the infamous sweating. Apparently that's a bad modifier on your social pools.

I'd go with digestive expansion. Then roam the country and sample the fare.

Sendaz
QUOTE (GiraffeShaman @ Aug 4 2013, 10:13 AM) *
And don't forget the infamous sweating. Apparently that's a bad modifier on your social pools.

Rumor has it that was a prototype pheromone implant that still needed ALOT of tweaking. nyahnyah.gif

Didn't exactly come up roses.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Elfenlied @ Aug 3 2013, 04:10 AM) *
I heard people only wash themselves in the hope of getting laid nyahnyah.gif


Manipulation, pure and simple... Crass behavior at the least. nyahnyah.gif
CanRay
QUOTE (Shortstraw @ Aug 3 2013, 11:12 PM) *
Canada is too cheap to give you titanium ones?
Yes.
Sendaz
QUOTE (Shortstraw @ Aug 4 2013, 12:12 AM) *
Canada is too cheap to give you titanium ones?

You have to remember they blew the majority of their budget on the adamantium they stuck in Wolverine. nyahnyah.gif

Frankly am surprised they sprung for steel and not maple wood lacing. wink.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012