Mistwalker
Mar 2 2007, 02:51 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
At the end of the day, armourers aren't going to waste resources building bigger bullets for 1% of the population to have bigger guns, especially when that 1% are poor criminal trolls that no one likes! |
Unless, of course, the armorer is a troll
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 02:57 PM
QUOTE (Mistwalker) |
QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Mar 2 2007, 09:39 AM) | At the end of the day, armourers aren't going to waste resources building bigger bullets for 1% of the population to have bigger guns, especially when that 1% are poor criminal trolls that no one likes! |
Unless, of course, the armorer is a troll |
Like I said, maybe you'd come across it during the game, but they're not exactly going to be mass produced.
I can see it now, engineer walks into Ares boardroom:
Engineer: "Hey guys, I got it! We can make bigger guns with bigger bullets for Trolls!"
Damien: "You want to give big scary stupid trolls - who have no money - bigger guns?"
Engineer *takes out mobile* "IT?... Yeah, I need some thoughts erasing?.... 5 minutes, I'll be right down."
HullBreach
Mar 2 2007, 03:10 PM
Reminds me of the Militech posters from CyberPunk 2020 which usually featured a good looking model holding a weapon:
"Big Guns for Big People"
nezumi
Mar 2 2007, 03:10 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
Which are machine pistols or SMGs, which are already catered for. |
Except that the current selection of SMGs and machine pistols do not include sawed off assault rifles.
QUOTE |
It's just an example of twinks wanting to get twinkier and looking for an excuse. |
Wow, it has been a very long time since I've been called a twink. Don't make generalizations, they don't suit you

QUOTE |
There are ways and means of acheiving the ends wanted, using the rules provided. |
So your argument is, you can make/modify new weapons from existing ones, but use the existing rules?
QUOTE |
At the end of the day, armourers aren't going to waste resources building bigger bullets for 1% of the population to have bigger guns, especially when that 1% are poor criminal trolls that no one likes! |
You mean people with cyberlimbs? That is what originally sparked my interest, and that is what the CP2020 super heavy pistols are based upon.
HullBreach
Mar 2 2007, 03:17 PM
Honestly I don't even think a cyberlimb is entirely necessary. For long arms (assuming were going to evolve this into very heavy versions of most classes of firearm) you could probobly get away with some simple strength enhancements. For handguns/machinepistols I'd recommend bone lacing as a minimum and would highly recommend some kind of strength boost.
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 03:32 PM
Oh yeah, because there's loads of gun totting people with sufficiently strength enhanced cyberlimbs to market these too as well.
Look at the market today, there simply isn't huge demand for the .50AE because it's pointless because a 9mm or .45 can do the same job much more cheaply, thus pretty much only the DEagle can fire it. That only changes in SR, because there are big bad trolls and better armour to worry about. Just because Trolls and some modified humans
could handle more power, doesn't create either a market or use for it. Just look at those .50BMG pistols - they're one offs for a reason.
HullBreach
Mar 2 2007, 03:45 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
Look at the market today, there simply isn't huge demand for the .50AE because it's pointless because a 9mm or .45 can do the same job much more cheaply, thus pretty much only the DEagle can fire it. |
I used to own an upper receiver for my AR-15 chambered in .50AE made by a company called Tromix.
Your also missing the point: 9mm and .45 do the job fine nowadays because were shooting at normal humans in an enviroment where body armor is rare.
In 2060 body armor is the norm, and your not always shooting at humans. Hell, even when you are shooting at humans, they arent always as squishy as we are. Dermal plating would probobly make short work of a 9mm.
nezumi
Mar 2 2007, 03:45 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Mar 2 2007, 10:32 AM) |
Oh yeah, because there's loads of gun totting people with sufficiently strength enhanced cyberlimbs to market these too as well. |
There's clearly a military and special ops use for them.
edit: Keep in mind, the vast majority of people can't use anything that uses .50 BMG, nor can they legally possess SMGs or flamethrowers or "armor penetrating ammunition". Yet these weapons are still possessed in sufficient quantities for them to be on the market, and for them to be on the street in SR.
My argument continues to be, there is a niche market for weapons too powerful to be handled by an unaugmented human. If your argument is fine, use existing weapons and modify them to fit into a different category (change an AK into an SMG or even a 'machine pistol') so as to avoid making a new category, that's fine, I'll note that. If your argument is that this market does not exist, or is too small to be worth noting, I would have to disagree strenuously.
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 04:06 PM
What? Flamethrowers and armour piercing munitions aren't exactly common on the street in SR. SMGs may be pretty common, but they're not unheard of on the street today.
My argument is that there may be a niche market for such heavily specialised weapons, just as there is the DEagle today - but such is the specialisation that it should be represented in availability. As I say, the desired effect can be acheived within the rules - if you want to allow that cut down AK to be fired on the Pistols skill, that's fine. At the end of the day, any one make and model in the book does represent 20 or 30 models and copies by a whole variety of manufacturers.
So, it's a case of Trolls and sufficiently cybered people can use it without penalty as though it's a pistol - to anyone else, it is an assault rifle.
nezumi
Mar 2 2007, 04:36 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
What? Flamethrowers and armour piercing munitions aren't exactly common on the street in SR. SMGs may be pretty common, but they're not unheard of on the street today.
|
I never said common on the street. I simply said 'on the street'. As flame throwers and APDS ammunitions are all listed in their assorted books, we can assume they are available to criminal elements and therefore, on the street.
QUOTE |
My argument is that there may be a niche market for such heavily specialised weapons, just as there is the DEagle today - but such is the specialisation that it should be represented in availability. |
That's fair.
QUOTE |
So, it's a case of Trolls and sufficiently cybered people can use it without penalty as though it's a pistol - to anyone else, it is an assault rifle. |
I don't know about that... I feel like a gun with no stock, a "short" barrel, and only one grip (so it cannot be properly used two handed) is not an assault rifle, regardless as to what it originally looked like. A sawed off shotgun (the streetsweeper) is no longer a shotgun, it is now a pistol.
Similarly, I would be hesitant to group our sawed off assault rifle in any current categories. Assault rifle? No, its made to be used one-handed. Machine pistol? Hrm... All machine pistols do a base of L damage, so it would seem sort of out of odds there. Heavy Pistol? Closer. The Thunderbolt is technically a machine pistol, but grouped with heavy pistols.
I think the question at that point is simply one of definitions, though. I don't feel like a sawed off assault rifle currently fits any of the existing categories, hence should be put into a new sub-category. I suppose you feel it can be forced into one of the existing categories (or even several).
Regardless, there are no sawed off assault rifles in the rules. They can be created with the rules, but there are not yet any examples. My question, poorly worded though it may have been, was more interested in whether these odd weapons would exist than how the rules would cope with them. It sounds like you are willing to accept that there would be a market for sawed-off assault rifles.
I suppose, reading the responses, that as a SA/SS handgun is scaled up in caliber, there is no reason why it still has the single-hand restriction. If the barrel is so short that there's no space for a fore grip, it gets no substantial benefits from having a larger bullet, so you might as well stick with a smaller caliber. If the barrel is long enough for the bullet to actually function as a bullet at that size, it can support a front grip and is basically a CQB, large-gauge shotgun. Does this sound reasonable?
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 05:12 PM
My point is that the weapons are built for Joe Average 3s accross the board stats man, and what catagory each weapon applies to, is how it would apply him. If you make a 'Very Heavy Pistol', everyone will want one, and want to be able to handle it as a pistol, when in fact Joe Average would need to hold it in two hands, just as they would with an Assault Rifle with a collapsable stock in it's folded down position. So, in terms of Joe Average - upon whom the catagories are based - you have just created yet another Assault Rifle - but, just as with regular Assault Rifles, trolls and particularly big and strong people can handle them like pistols.
nezumi
Mar 2 2007, 06:30 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
If you make a 'Very Heavy Pistol', everyone will want one, and want to be able to handle it as a pistol, when in fact Joe Average would need to hold it in two hands, just as they would with an Assault Rifle with a collapsable stock in it's folded down position. |
I think this is where we truly disagree.
If I made a new category, VHP, it would be usable by Joe Average only if he were willing to be physically hurt when making each shot. In other words, the recoil is so extreme that it cannot be safely handled by a Strength 3 character.
I am unaware of any way that I could use a large pistol (say a desert eagle) with two hands "just as [I] would with an assault rifle with a collapsable stock in its folded down position". Perhaps if you could illuminate me as to how a single-grip pistol frame could be handled like a long gun, I'd agree with you.
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 08:03 PM
Which takes me back to the demand issue, only very specialised gunsmiths are going to produce such a thing, because the market for something like that would be tiny. You assess the actual cost of augmenting a normal human to be able to withstand such a weapon you're suggesting, and convince me that anyone, even a major corp, is going to go to such an expense, on such a regular basis that they need this weapon? A pistol is a backup, not a first choice, anything around the size you're suggesting is already bigger than a lot of SMGs, which are primary weapons.
Sure, there's trolls and cybered threats around, but that's why Heavy Pistols are popular and no one uses a Hold Out. It's why corp security has rapid response teams with ARs and SMGs. It's why Lone Star pack Thunderbolts.
X-Kalibur
Mar 2 2007, 08:14 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
Which takes me back to the demand issue, only very specialised gunsmiths are going to produce such a thing, because the market for something like that would be tiny. You assess the actual cost of augmenting a normal human to be able to withstand such a weapon you're suggesting, and convince me that anyone, even a major corp, is going to go to such an expense, on such a regular basis that they need this weapon? A pistol is a backup, not a first choice, anything around the size you're suggesting is already bigger than a lot of SMGs, which are primary weapons.
Sure, there's trolls and cybered threats around, but that's why Heavy Pistols are popular and no one uses a Hold Out. It's why corp security has rapid response teams with ARs and SMGs. It's why Lone Star pack Thunderbolts. |
And that is precisely what the availability table is meant to represent. There was something that very likely fits the description of the VHP in SR3 with Eichiro Hatamoto. Didn't even break your wrist to fire it, but the availability on it was quite high, as was the Street Index. If Cannon Companion had rules for upgrading the M on a Heavy Pistol to an S, at the cost of most of its ammo storage, inability to mount barrel accessories, and more than likely use an internal magazine. The whole idea is that you waste the fragger with the couple shots you've got in it while you make your way to something more effective, or just take the poor sod's, whose head is now a bloody splatter on the wall, weapon that is hopefully an SMG or larger. It's precisely why my SR3 streetsam packed a Savalette Guardian and an Eichiro Hatamoto. While the burst on the Guardian is a complex action, I've managed to take an armored troll down in that one burst before. It took down a sizeable threat and allowed me to take his AR and hose down the remaining opposition.
Darkest Angel
Mar 2 2007, 08:24 PM
Thanks for proving my point. Why produce a VHP when a regular HP with BF is sufficiently adequate to do the same job and anyone can use it?
The title of the thread is "is the VHP necessary?" You have demonstrated perfectly why it is not imho necessary.
X-Kalibur
Mar 2 2007, 08:32 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
Thanks for proving my point. Why produce a VHP when a regular HP with BF is sufficiently adequate to do the same job and anyone can use it?
The title of the thread is "is the VHP necessary?" You have demonstrated perfectly why it is not imho necessary. |
I'm arguing that the top end HPs are realistically VHPs that could be expanded upon more.
Wounded Ronin
Mar 3 2007, 01:35 AM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
What? Flamethrowers and armour piercing munitions aren't exactly common on the street in SR. SMGs may be pretty common, but they're not unheard of on the street today. |
You're probably not aware that in the United States some people own machine guns. Not assault rifles or SMGs, but actual machine guns like Browning Automatic Rifles and M60s.
So, I don't think your analogy holds water.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 3 2007, 03:28 AM
IIRC, doesn't that require more tape manuevering. Something like, competency course, back ground check, and an endorsement from the local sheriff or some such?
Wounded Ronin
Mar 3 2007, 03:39 AM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
IIRC, doesn't that require more tape manuevering. Something like, competency course, back ground check, and an endorsement from the local sheriff or some such? |
I'm not totally read up on the process but I think the hardest part is getting some paperwork successfully through the ATF. It's not as trival to own them as it is (relatively speaking) a handgun or shotgun, no.
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 03:57 AM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
IIRC, doesn't that require more tape manuevering. Something like, competency course, back ground check, and an endorsement from the local sheriff or some such? |
Going through this process myself. It sucks, and is expensive, but it's the only way to get access to the fun toys. Basically it consists of a federal background check, $200 tax, and LOTS of paperwork. The entire process is intended to discourage ownership by annoyance.
Sad part is, Im not even bagging an automatic, I just want to put a front grip on a Bushmaster Carbon-15.
Back on subject though, this topic does breach an even larger one: If a player can get away with larger than normal pistols, what about super-heavy variants on longarms?
10 and even 8 gauge shotguns are within this realm of possibillity. Or a .300wsm Assault rifle. So many sick ideas...
nezumi
Mar 3 2007, 03:59 AM
Yeah, plus there may be state restrictions.
If you already had a gov't background check for your job, does that count?
Garrowolf
Mar 3 2007, 04:04 AM
Okay I dont understand the argument that no one would produce a gun for a specialized portion of the population. The game already has metahuman modifications as a feature. We have very specialized guns right now. What is the problem?
I dont think that the question should be is the VHP necessary. I think that it should be why isnt it already in the game. It doesnt make sense as a game balence issue. Shadowrun has always had poor game balence. None of this stuff is all that balenced in the first place.
You shoot someone with a high skill and a heavy gun then they die. It's a deadly game. Magic users are deadly too.
Heavy weapons and strength are the schtick of Trolls. Let them have that and move on.
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 04:04 AM
QUOTE (nezumi) |
Yeah, plus there may be state restrictions.
If you already had a gov't background check for your job, does that count? |
Negative. It's got to be a fresh one. The BATFE doesn't play well with others.
Hell, I'd love to get one of these, as theyre considered Class 3 as well:
http://www.anzioironworks.com/MAG-FED-20MM-RIFLE.htmToo bad I don't have that kind of scratch on hand.
Darkest Angel
Mar 3 2007, 09:17 AM
QUOTE (Garrowolf) |
Okay I dont understand the argument that no one would produce a gun for a specialized portion of the population. The game already has metahuman modifications as a feature. We have very specialized guns right now. What is the problem? |
Modifying an existing weapon is a lot cheaper than designing, testing, and producing a whole new one.
Trolls, iirc are like 1% of the population, the vast majority are poor and live in slum districts. Heavily cybered people from every other race combined add up to even less, so catering for wealthy enough trolls and wealthy enough heavily cybered people is catering for a fringe of a fringe - big corps just don't do that, they churn out what they can sell thousands of.
Those very specialised guns around today are made to order by small time gunsmiths. I've never argued with that. The stuff in the books however, is based on what is readily available and produced in sufficient quantities that you could to run into them on the street. Every 'counter' I've seen so far is "but you can get this today!" so what? they're all insanely rare toys that have been sold in numbers that barely exceed double figures. I see no reason to include something like that in canon.
knasser
Mar 3 2007, 11:01 AM
Don't there
have to be troll sized variant weapons due to trolls inability to use normal sized weapons?
A while back I sketched out the actual size differences in different metahumans according to SR4 BBB.
Different Metatype Sizes. Look at the difference between a troll and a human. Unless trolls have comically small hands for their build, I wouldn't think they'd be able to use most standard firearms comfortably (confirmation from the gun nuts, please).
So if any trolls are to have firearms (esp. pistols) in your game, then we're already saying that there has to be a custom market. And if that's the case, then I can certainly see the possibility of this market providing more power too, whether for marketing purposes or an actual need in a world where body armour is frequently worn and you have people who can shrug off lighter rounds. The argument that it is catering to a "fringe of a fringe" and therefore not economically viable is a pretty weak one because with a world population of, let's say, six billion, that's sixty million trolls out there to sell to.
And if you want to say that trolls are also marginalised and poor, then I'd say that means an increased desire on their part for firearms that outweighs any difficulty in paying. If you're saying that all the kids in the USA that have firearms have well-paying middle-class jobs, then I think you're mistaken.
And finally, in countries with a lot of civil unrest (of which there are plenty in 2070), I'd say that trolls are going to be used in militias and armies quite extensively. There is an incentive to arm these trolls so somebody somewhere will make them. these weapons. And if so, then a Shadowrunner should be able to get hold of them, too.
The only question is whether or not these troll weapons would be made with extra power. I know very little about guns, but I think the case that there was a use for this in the cybered, trolled-up body-armour loving world of 2070 was put quite convincingly earlier in the thread by people more knowledgeable on the subject than me.
Darkest Angel
Mar 3 2007, 11:52 AM
I'm not saying they wouldn't be made, and I'm certainly not saying they couldn't be made. What I am saying is this, in a world of around 4bn (thanks to VITAS and no small amount of genocide, civil wars and other upheaval), you have 40,000,000 trolls, most of whom live in countries with pretty tough gun control laws, so getting such a thing legally would involve some serious hoop jumping - not easy for sinless trolls - your market would be actually pretty microscopic - you're talking about arming up a few hundred official troops/security and paramilitary police (your main market) and a small number of insurgents (you illicit market) - most of whom would be the heavy weapons guy in the squad, so would be kitted out with PACs, HMGs, or Vindicators instead of poxy pistols. So what? You're producing a sidearm for the one guy in the squad who needs it least. Seriously, the only legit guy in that list who might carry one is the police troll, so your legal market consists of a few gun nuts in North America, a couple of hundred policemen worldwide, and some terrorists. That's not going to net you a major profit.
Now, there are reasons for standard issue as well, in NATO, the British, Americans, Germans and Italians all use different rifles, but they all fire 5.56mm NATO ammunition and all accept the exact same magazines - why? So in a combat situation, Johnny British can shout 'need ammo' to his US counterpart, who can throw him a clip and Johnny can use it. Same applies within a squad. Heavy weapons chap uses a M249, it uses 5.56mm - same as an M16, SA80, and G3 - why? So the ammunition can be spread round the squad and everyone can use it. Standard issue sidearms in NATO are 9mm, why? So ammo can be passed round to where it's needed. There's also the economic factor, it's far cheaper to ship in 50million rounds of 5.56mm NATO than to ship in dribs and drabs of different types - that's never going to change. So not only is it not viable to sell them like that, it's not practical to buy or use them like that.
Butterblume
Mar 3 2007, 03:02 PM
G3 and MG3 both use 7,62mm. Just saying

.
(granted, the G36 uses 5,56mm, but it's fairly new, 1995 or so. The new MG4 isn't in active service yet, as far as I know)
Edit: oh, on topic: how many people would actually buy a mag lock sequenzer and stuff like that? Certainly less than 40 million

.
knasser
Mar 3 2007, 05:48 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Mar 3 2007, 11:52 AM) |
I'm not saying they wouldn't be made, and I'm certainly not saying they couldn't be made. What I am saying is this, in a world of around 4bn (thanks to VITAS and no small amount of genocide, civil wars and other upheaval), you have 40,000,000 trolls, most of whom live in countries with pretty tough gun control laws, so getting such a thing legally would involve some serious hoop jumping - not easy for sinless trolls - your market would be actually pretty microscopic - you're talking about arming up a few hundred official troops/security and paramilitary police (your main market) and a small number of insurgents (you illicit market) - most of whom would be the heavy weapons guy in the squad, so would be kitted out with PACs, HMGs, or Vindicators instead of poxy pistols. So what? You're producing a sidearm for the one guy in the squad who needs it least. Seriously, the only legit guy in that list who might carry one is the police troll, so your legal market consists of a few gun nuts in North America, a couple of hundred policemen worldwide, and some terrorists. That's not going to net you a major profit.
Now, there are reasons for standard issue as well, in NATO, the British, Americans, Germans and Italians all use different rifles, but they all fire 5.56mm NATO ammunition and all accept the exact same magazines - why? So in a combat situation, Johnny British can shout 'need ammo' to his US counterpart, who can throw him a clip and Johnny can use it. Same applies within a squad. Heavy weapons chap uses a M249, it uses 5.56mm - same as an M16, SA80, and G3 - why? So the ammunition can be spread round the squad and everyone can use it. Standard issue sidearms in NATO are 9mm, why? So ammo can be passed round to where it's needed. There's also the economic factor, it's far cheaper to ship in 50million rounds of 5.56mm NATO than to ship in dribs and drabs of different types - that's never going to change. So not only is it not viable to sell them like that, it's not practical to buy or use them like that. |
Leaving aside my essential point, which is that trolls probably can't use standard sized weapons so that there would have to custom made guns anyway, I think there's a few holes in what you said.
The 4bn figure I think is unlikely. I already picked 6bn as a compromise between the decimation from VITAS and the fact that by 2070, we'd almost certainly see a huge swell in the population (it's over 6 billion now). I think your 4 billion is way too conservative. But even allowing that, I can't dismiss a potential market of 40 million customers as not worth the time. The way that you made a few general statements and reduced 40 million to
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
so your legal market consists of a few gun nuts in North America, a couple of hundred policemen worldwide, and some terrorists. |
is a little outrageous. And quite frankly, in the world of Shadowrun, it is not valid to count only the legal market and dismiss the black market at all
Not that I agree the legal market is a few hundred policemen, gun nuts and "terrorists" (a term that has become useless in the last five years) You say most of them live in countries with tough gun control. In 2070, most of the world has gone through intense periods of civil unrest and many parts remain that way. Even a corporation-heavy nation such as the UCAS has large, lawless areas in many of its cities (Seattle being the BBB example). And most of the firearms in the book are legality R, not F. So if a troll is a SINer, then they can apply and probably get one. If the troll is SINless, then they can get a gun from their local street dealer. What I'm saying is that there is a market that is more than large enough to be worth catering for. The only issue is supplying the customer and in a world as crime ridden (and perhaps more importantly balkanised) as the world of 2070, there's always someone who knows someone. Heck, you can probably order them off the matrix without hitting too much legal supervision.
I'm sticking by what I said, which is that there will be mass-market weapons for trolls. The only question then, is if you're making custom weapons, is it worth making them more powerful at the same time? That depends on whether its a good selling point or not. People earlier made some fairly convincing (to me) arguments that in the world of Shadowrun it would be, so I'm going with that.
I don't think the ammunition issue would be a big problem. Most people don't go through ammunition the way a shadowrun team does. Tariq the Troll who lives quietly at home, probably has a box of 30 in his bedside drawer and I don't see why no-one would mass-produce them as they can't be that complicated in manufacturing terms. If you've sold the guns, you know you're going to sell the ammunition.
The Stainless Steel Rat
Mar 3 2007, 07:19 PM
I voted "Yes, with Recoil Comp or Strength Requirement", but would like instead to say "Yes, with double or more recoil depending on design." The thing is,
VHPs Already ExistAnybody with decent Pistols B/R skill and a Shop can build a pistol that will fire any ammo available. For that matter, the same individual could create any sized ammunition, so the size of weapons really has no limit. It's just a GM call on whether any created weapon can be used in their game, and if so, to reach an agreement with the player on how the rules would work.
Personally I would use the CC firearm creation rules, but either allow multiple uses of the "Barrel Reduction" option, or create a new option called "Pistol Variant" that reduces range to HP. Raygun has
Rules Posted for any caliber round in varying sized firearms.
Mistwalker
Mar 3 2007, 07:22 PM
I agree with Knasser,
There will be a market for these oversized weapons, VHPs etc...
There are trolls that are very rich, in cannon, that own corporation, so I do not see why they would not start a production line of of Troll sized VHPs. Even if Ares didn't start one, just to try and get more of a market share, others would. If you can make a profit, someone will make the weapons.
Most of the world does not have strict gun control laws. The UK managed to keep them, but not very many other places.
One of the questions that I have is, would a 50 calibler pistol round be able to go thru an engine block?
Austere Emancipator
Mar 3 2007, 07:28 PM
QUOTE (Mistwalker) |
One of the questions that I have is, would a 50 calibler pistol round be able to go thru an engine block? |
Depends on the engine in question and where you hit it, doesn't it?
An M903 SLAP round fired at 3000fps can probably manage something like 20mm to an inch of armor steel at close range. That's enough to get through most light APCs, but I have no idea how it rates in car engines.
A Mk 211 Mod 0 at 2200fps would seriously fuck up any car engine it hits even if it's unlikely to penetrate, however.
hyzmarca
Mar 3 2007, 07:31 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel @ Mar 3 2007, 06:52 AM) |
I most of whom live in countries with pretty tough gun control laws, so getting such a thing legally would involve some serious hoop jumping |
Actually, local gun control laws are meaningless in a world where extraterritorial stores are commonplace. If you walk into an Ares Weapons Emporium located in London, you are not on British soil; you're on Ares soil. No matter how strict London's gun laws are, they do nothing to prevent you from buying any gun from that Ares store.
A lot of gun control nuts in places with tough gun control laws blame all of their problems on smuggling from places that have light gun control laws. In some ways, this is true, although the best solution is to repeal their own stupid laws rather than complaining about the laws that other jurisdictions have.
In the Sixth World, the this issue is much more obvious. When I'm standing in an Ares-owned gun store Ares gun control laws apply to my firearms purchases and only Ares gun control laws apply to my firearms purchases. The laws outside of the store do not matter one bit. considerings that Ares is an arms dealer, I imagine that their laws are quite lax.
ronin3338
Mar 3 2007, 07:45 PM
I would allow VHPs under very specific circumstances.
First, there are not that many trolls, so mass producing a pistol specifically for them is not cost effective.
Second, there's not really a "need" for a huge pistol. The large caliber pistols, SMGs, and new, compact ARs give plenty of firepower.
However, I would allow a custom made, or pre-production weapon. It would be temperamental, pricey, or both. Honestly, there's no reason that you couldn't make a troll sized zip-gun or something like that. I've seen .50 cal. "pistols" and while they are few and far between, modifying one for a troll's grip wouldn't be difficult if you can find one.
And yes, I would impose a minimum STR to use it (like a bow) unless it was heavily comp'd for recoil (and maybe even then, depending on how it was comp'd), and you can forget about concealability.
knasser
Mar 3 2007, 08:05 PM
QUOTE (Ronin3338) |
First, there are not that many trolls, so mass producing a pistol specifically for them is not cost effective. |
*cough* 60 million worldwide. And as someone pointed out, more predominently in the sectors of society that would want a gun. If Amazon can make money selling and posting me a £6.99 book, I think someone can do it with a 350

gun.
QUOTE (Ronin3338) |
Second, there's not really a "need" for a huge pistol. The large caliber pistols, SMGs, and new, compact ARs give plenty of firepower. |
Body armour isn't frequently worn by gangs, today. Materials science has moved on by 2070 and so has the level of violence in society increased. Plus there are trolls who are naturally resistant to smaller bullets and others who are augmented against them. And magic. And quite frankly most of the people who have guns don't "need" them. There's a status, image thing, as well as the pleasure some people take in something powerful. That says 'market,' to me.
I don't know anything about guns, though, so whether there is an actual advantage in these things in 2070 terms, someone else will have to chime in. I would guess getting hit by one of these would give more of a 'kick' regardless of penetration through armour.
Darkest Angel
Mar 3 2007, 08:34 PM
QUOTE (The Stainless Steel Rat) |
I voted "Yes, with Recoil Comp or Strength Requirement", but would like instead to say "Yes, with double or more recoil depending on design." The thing is, VHPs Already Exist |
Point to where I disputed that.
It does not change the following facts about todays HPs, for example the .50AE Desert Eagle.
1) They are not produced on anything like the scale of a 9mm Browning or Berreta, or .45 Colt.
2) They are not in wide circulation in security, military, or paramiltary circles.
3) They are not even in wide circulation in private handgun circles.
The same is going to be true of VHPs in SR for the reasons I've given, armies, security forces, and paramilitaries are still going to be overwhelmingly human, with probably a fair few Orks who are equally human sized. As a result of this, to ensure weapon availability and ammunition availability to everyone, the key customers of Ares and their ilk are going to want lots of the same weapons, with a few customs for Trolls and Dwarves that use the same ammunition as is easily usable for the overwhelming majority of personnel. As I say, if said force wants to make use of a Trolls greater strength, they're going to hand them a HMG or PAC - they're NOT going to hand them a specialist pistol that can only be used by another 6 guys in that regiment, heck they're not going to hand him any pistol - I don't know of any army that issues sidearms to grunts. No point, no market there. In the security sector, where grunts may well get an SMG and a sidearm, they're not going to hand them a VHP as a sidearm, again the SMG is weapon #1 and, being an SMG will share ammo with the pistols, they're not going to want to ship in a limited amount of special calibre ammo for two or three guys. That leaves you with the private sector, which in numbers compared to military spending is pocket change - this is where you would find the market, but trolls being trolls aren't going to have an easy time aquiring legal firearms anywhere in the world. Some will, but they are going to number in the thousands worldwide as opposed to the millions of Predators Ares ship out.
X-Kalibur
Mar 3 2007, 08:41 PM
I'm sorry, your logic simply does not make sense. Look at the Smith and Wesson 500. It's pretty much meant for big game hunting, very big game hunting, the barrel alone is huge. I've actually handled one, it's heavy as fuck. I'd classify it as a VHP being marketed to a very limited market... even MORE limited than your troll market you keep harping on, to which we have on many occassions pointed out are NOT the only market. There are people cybered to the gills, trolls, orks, enthusiasts, mercs, and spec ops teams. You can't port around an HMG or PAC very easily, versus the VHP which you can holster and not worry about every dick and jane on the street know what you are packing.
Crakkerjakk
Mar 3 2007, 09:08 PM
I think an important point that may have been overlooked here is that for most military type folks, a pistol is a sidearm. Currently, I don't know of any sidearm issued to a military that will go through body armor of the sort issued to every soldier in the US military. They will all be stopped. I voted on the "no" side of this issue, and I guess my problem with the whole thing is that people are wanting a pistol to be something that it's not, in my mind. Military tech is always a race between offensive and defensive. Plate armor was the be-all end-all of defensive tech, till someone invented the musket(and to some extent the long-bow.) I personally am okay with the thought that a pistol round will be stopped by most body armor. Creating a bigger pistol, to me, is not the way to solve the problem that body armor is sufficiently advanced to be highly effective. Besides, you make a better gun, if it's possible, someones just gonna make better armor. Not to mention the fact that when you make a handgun that will drop trolls fairly easily, it's probably gonna be about the size at least of a machine pistol and maybe even a SMG.
Yes there are big guns out there today. But the equipement list in the book is bare bones. If you actually want a whole new category of pistols, why not a new category of everything else? To me this seems like trying to make it so that pistols fill the niche that the rest of the weapons list is meant to occupy. I mean, what precisely is the difference between a VHP and a short barrel shotgun with a pistol grip firing slug rounds? The VHP has a slide or a cylinder instead of an internal mag and a pump?
Not to mention you make a huge honkin pistol designed to drop trolls, it's gonna leave watermelon sized holes in normal folks. I dunno. My philosophy on adding things to my games has always been reductionist. If there's a hole in the game, or problems with the rules, I try to make a patch that sticks with the spirit of the rules and works according to how I think reality should. But for things that are merely "cool" I am much more wary of adding them to the game. I feel like if you add bigger and bigger guns to shadowrun, eventually you have runners driving Main Battle Tanks down the road on their way to the run, and toting around flamethrowers and manportable masers. I don't like the escalation.
My two cents, and I felt like it was a little different than the whole supply issue everyone else has been arguing.
Darkest Angel
Mar 3 2007, 09:45 PM
QUOTE (X-Kalibur) |
I'm sorry, your logic simply does not make sense. Look at the Smith and Wesson 500. It's pretty much meant for big game hunting, very big game hunting, the barrel alone is huge. I've actually handled one, it's heavy as fuck. I'd classify it as a VHP being marketed to a very limited market... even MORE limited than your troll market you keep harping on, to which we have on many occassions pointed out are NOT the only market. There are people cybered to the gills, trolls, orks, enthusiasts, mercs, and spec ops teams. You can't port around an HMG or PAC very easily, versus the VHP which you can holster and not worry about every dick and jane on the street know what you are packing. |
Again, my case in point. How many S&W 500s are produced annually? How many are used by police, military and paramilitaries?
knasser
Mar 3 2007, 09:52 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
QUOTE (The Stainless Steel Rat @ Mar 3 2007, 08:19 PM) | I voted "Yes, with Recoil Comp or Strength Requirement", but would like instead to say "Yes, with double or more recoil depending on design." The thing is, VHPs Already Exist |
Point to where I disputed that.
It does not change the following facts about todays HPs, for example the .50AE Desert Eagle.
1) They are not produced on anything like the scale of a 9mm Browning or Berreta, or .45 Colt. 2) They are not in wide circulation in security, military, or paramiltary circles. 3) They are not even in wide circulation in private handgun circles.
The same is going to be true of VHPs in SR for the reasons I've given, armies, security forces, and paramilitaries are still going to be overwhelmingly human, with probably a fair few Orks who are equally human sized. As a result of this, to ensure weapon availability and ammunition availability to everyone, the key customers of Ares and their ilk are going to want lots of the same weapons, with a few customs for Trolls and Dwarves that use the same ammunition as is easily usable for the overwhelming majority of personnel. As I say, if said force wants to make use of a Trolls greater strength, they're going to hand them a HMG or PAC - they're NOT going to hand them a specialist pistol that can only be used by another 6 guys in that regiment, heck they're not going to hand him any pistol - I don't know of any army that issues sidearms to grunts. No point, no market there. In the security sector, where grunts may well get an SMG and a sidearm, they're not going to hand them a VHP as a sidearm, again the SMG is weapon #1 and, being an SMG will share ammo with the pistols, they're not going to want to ship in a limited amount of special calibre ammo for two or three guys. That leaves you with the private sector, which in numbers compared to military spending is pocket change - this is where you would find the market, but trolls being trolls aren't going to have an easy time aquiring legal firearms anywhere in the world. Some will, but they are going to number in the thousands worldwide as opposed to the millions of Predators Ares ship out.
|
If you're arguing that cost and availability is higher, then I'm not going to dispute that. I think it's a GM judgement call, but certainly can be argued. I think if you say that there aren't going to be VHP's though, then I disagree for the reasons I've given.
I've noticed one difference in our assumptions which is that you keep referring to trolls being SINless or not likely to have a legal ability to get such a weapon. There is racism and probably a higher proportion of trolls are going to be SINless than humans. But I don't think it's a big swing. It sounds as though in your game "legal" trolls are the exception. There are many many legitimate citizens of UCAS and elsewhere that are trolls. And these are just as able to get a firearms permit as a human.
But again, I think whether the market is "legal" or not is much less significant than you portray it to be. With endless different juristictions (Ares, UCAS, Renraku) all jumbled up together, legal is a much greyer area. If trolls want these things, then someone will make and sell them. It's just too large a market to ignore.
Regarding the ammo, you are right that it is less convenient, but (though I don't know much about this), I would guess bullets aren't that complicated to make and the ammo would be available. There are all sorts of niche markets in real life that do very well. I think larger bullets would be an easy one. Most people who own a pistol don't worry excessively about running out of ammo. I don't want to know what scenario you picture where you think "I would buy this better gun, but I better not, because if I want to shoot more than 16 people, I wont be able to borrow the bullets from my mate's gun."
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 09:52 PM
QUOTE (Darkest Angel) |
Again, my case in point. How many S&W 500s are produced annually? How many are used by police, military and paramilitaries? |
Your still missing the point we've made. There isn't a need for that kind of firepower and scale of weapon today.
There is a need in the world as described by Shadowrun.
Butterblume
Mar 3 2007, 10:06 PM
QUOTE (Crakkerjakk) |
I think an important point that may have been overlooked here is that for most military type folks, a pistol is a sidearm. Currently, I don't know of any sidearm issued to a military that will go through body armor of the sort issued to every soldier in the US military. They will all be stopped. |
How about the MP7? I hear they can penetrate body armor at a decent range, but I shockingly don't know anything about current body armor

.
Probably not a good example for SR, because the ridicoulus small 4,6mm ammunition is already armor piercing.
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 10:26 PM
QUOTE (Butterblume) |
How about the MP7? I hear they can penetrate body armor at a decent range, but I shockingly don't know anything about current body armor .
Probably not a good example for SR, because the ridicoulus small 4,6mm ammunition is already armor piercing. |
It uses the same principles as the 5.7x28mm ammunition the P-90 fires. Its a small caliber low mass but very high velocity projectile.
While they are very capable of penetrating most modern body armors, the terminal wounding characteristics of these weapons are pretty unimpressive. They are actually only about as effective as a .22mag once they get to the meat.
Crakkerjakk
Mar 3 2007, 10:31 PM
Sorry, usually when I say pistol, I mean, like, something you can fit into a holster. If you're carrying a rifle, you're not also going to be carrying one of these. I'm still not entirely clear on the difference between a SMG and a machine pistol....
Looking at the wiki for it, though, it states that the rounds it uses are actually AP rounds, being made out of a "hardened steel penetrator instead of softer brass or lead." It goes on to state that the round is almost unique to the weapon. It's not that the round is small that makes it AP, it's because it is small and uses a lot of powder, and is made out of hardened steel, it will bust through body armor. A .22 LR (Long Rifle, standard round fired by .22 rifles) round is small, but won't go through body armor. The 5.56 round fired by the M-16, although about the same size as the .22 LR round in diameter, will go through body armor(unless it hits a trauma plate), because there is more powder behind it, and this results in a higher velocity.
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 10:38 PM
QUOTE (Crakkerjakk) |
Sorry, usually when I say pistol, I mean, like, something you can fit into a holster. If you're carrying a rifle, you're not also going to be carrying one of these. I'm still not entirely clear on the difference between a SMG and a machine pistol.... |
This got me thinking, and Im working on producing a sort of 'spectrum of weapons' that would start with derringers and run clean through to heavy machineguns, while highlighting the distinct properties that make each fit into its own particular niche.
I also think that SR should expand to include a category for medium pistols to represent calibers like the .40S&W and .357Sig
Crakkerjakk
Mar 3 2007, 10:54 PM
*lip quivers* My Sig isn't a medium pistol.... it's not it's not it's not!
(Eliza doesn't hold it against you Hull. Eliza being my P226, chambered in the .40S&W)
Really though, I would call a 9mm medium, but you'd include the .40 and .357?
Butterblume
Mar 3 2007, 11:10 PM
The MP7 fits into a holster, which is behind the whole idea of the PDW (personal defense weapon) as sidearm. Of course, unless you're special forces, the normal rifleman wouldn't carry one, but those doesn't carry pistols either.
HullBreach
Mar 3 2007, 11:55 PM
QUOTE (Crakkerjakk) |
*lip quivers* My Sig isn't a medium pistol.... it's not it's not it's not!
(Eliza doesn't hold it against you Hull. Eliza being my P226, chambered in the .40S&W)
Really though, I would call a 9mm medium, but you'd include the .40 and .357? |
Hmmm....I in no way meant to insult your lady freind there!
Let me explain my reasoning and how I would have broken out the groupings:
Holdout Pistols:
Holdout pistols are weapons that are designed with concealabillity as their primary purpose. These are small weapons which rarely hold more than 5-6 shots, with most only holding 2-4. These are sometimes chambered in the same calibers as heavy pistols.
Light Pistols:
This category covers semiautomatic handguns or revolvers chambered in the range of .17hmr to .380acp. These are light weapons which often have capacities in excess of 15 rounds.
Medium Pistols:
This category covers semiautomatic handguns or revolvers chambered in the range of 9x19mm through .357magnum. These are medium-weight weapons popular with police and militaries for there excellent balance between stopping power and capacity. Capacities will range from 10-17 rounds. The rounds fired by these weapons are generally faster and lighter than those of the heavy pistols, making them a little more capable against modern soft armors.
Heavy Pistols:
This category covers semiautomatic handguns or revolvers chambered in the range of .45acp through .44magnum. These are designed to throw big mean chuncks of lead downrange, and are intended to be capable of one-shot stops. Follow up shots are sometimes a little difficult with these weapons due to their more robust recoil.
Very Heavy Pistols:
This category covers all semiautomatic handguns and revolvers in the range of .454 Casull on up. These are large, expensive, and a little exotic in the world of firearms. Most commonly used for hunting, these are useful in the shadowrun universe as two-legged varmits tend to have tougher skins nowadays.
Machine Pistols:
Machine pistols are any pistols capable of select fire.
Garrowolf
Mar 4 2007, 04:05 AM
You have a small portion of the population that is primarily thought of as thugs. They are stronger then a human and tougher. They are being used as bodyguards, bouncers, and thugs by several groups. They would be commonly be used as heavy weapons infantry in several armies. Probably a much higher percentage of them would be using weapons then of humans.
The setting is a bit dark. Street life is dangerous. Larger number of street people are armed then current era.
Everything points to not a small number of customers but a large number of large customers.
On top of that a Troll can't really use a human sized gun. That means that for the few manufacturers that have Troll Scale weapons they would have a dedicated client base.
The metahuman variant isn't free either so you can't say that no one would buy it because they already buy it.
Something that size would have problems with very small objects. I know people with large hands that can't grab small things as it is. Add bumpy skin from Troll skin and I think that it would be like trying to load a revolver with space suit gloves.
Make a large solid heavy gun that loads rifle rounds. They can handle the weight and the kick. There is your VHP.
X-Kalibur
Mar 4 2007, 06:27 AM
QUOTE (Garrowolf) |
You have a small portion of the population that is primarily thought of as thugs. They are stronger then a human and tougher. They are being used as bodyguards, bouncers, and thugs by several groups. They would be commonly be used as heavy weapons infantry in several armies. Probably a much higher percentage of them would be using weapons then of humans.
The setting is a bit dark. Street life is dangerous. Larger number of street people are armed then current era.
Everything points to not a small number of customers but a large number of large customers.
On top of that a Troll can't really use a human sized gun. That means that for the few manufacturers that have Troll Scale weapons they would have a dedicated client base.
The metahuman variant isn't free either so you can't say that no one would buy it because they already buy it.
Something that size would have problems with very small objects. I know people with large hands that can't grab small things as it is. Add bumpy skin from Troll skin and I think that it would be like trying to load a revolver with space suit gloves.
Make a large solid heavy gun that loads rifle rounds. They can handle the weight and the kick. There is your VHP. |
Hell, they have a handgun in Fallout and Fallout 2 that fires .223 FMJ. That alone should be a good enough reason to have them in SR
Darkest Angel
Mar 4 2007, 10:16 AM
You're not going to convince me. Like I say, where they may come in "useful" they're superceded by more readily available weapons such as sawn off shotguns, the Thunderbolt, Guardian, Warhawk and Hatamoto. No major buyers are going to get them in, so you're left with the private market, which will simply make them more costly and harder to find. IMG they'd be a custom build. Custom or rare weapons such as those aren't going to be helpful once someone is after you, they connect you to all your previous felonies. You don't want that.
Seriously, the fact that troll and dwarf customisation costs so much more is reflection enough of the market as it is. If they were that common they would produce them at no extra cost.