hunter5150
Jun 29 2004, 02:48 AM
Hello friends and countrymen. I have posed this question to my gaming group, my local gamestore manager and a few homeless street urchins I found. None could give me a definative answer so I pose the question to the resident experts here. Las Vegas is one of the largest cities with some of the highest crime, largest corporations (casinos), and tightest security (also in the casinos) in the U.S. All of this would play extremely well into the SR universe. Especially considering it is right smack dab in the middle of NAN territory. (Native Americans and casinos what a perfect match) However I have found precious little as far as source material on this city. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
FlakJacket
Jun 29 2004, 02:55 AM
Your best bet would be Shadows of North America. What little information there is is in the Ute chapter.
Prospero
Jun 29 2004, 03:56 AM
There's also a short update to the SoNA info in the Sprawl Survival Guide, in the hotspots section. It gives a few hints as to what's going on in Vegas since 2062 when SoNA is set.
BitBasher
Jun 29 2004, 04:01 AM
Las Vegas does not have one of the highest urban crime rates. Above average, yes, one of the highest, not really.
In SR Las Vegas is a lousy place to SR. Not many corporate compounds, and pretty much everyone is an indian. People that aren't indians stick out, and all the indians are allowed to openly carry weapons, making your life very, very difficult. Old Native American Nations books followed this.
Abstruse
Jun 29 2004, 10:31 AM
Your best bet for a run in Vegas is an extraction or assassination of a tourist there or trying to scam the casino. The latter is almost impossible.
I think this came up on another thread, but casinos in Vegas would have the following security most likely:
- Cyberscanners on all entrances with security ready to restrain damn near anything, even legal implants like datajacks, chipjacks, and math SPUs (which could be used to provide an advantage over the house at certain games).
- Spirits of all sorts patrolling non-stop, ready to pounce into action at the slightest hint of magical activity. Even a quick peek into the astral could ruin a poker game as you could tell the stress of another player, thus telling that they're bluffing.
- Security guards openly sitting around the like of which you'd only see in an Corp Zero Zone.
The Abstruse One
lspahn72
Jun 29 2004, 05:55 PM
My group is currently "hiding" in vegas. Two are Indian so that helps, and they have a few contacts. Ive tried to play up the organized crime element as well as the "you are too white for me" element of teh NAN. It has reduced the amount of firepower we take to micky ds now...
Black Isis
Jun 29 2004, 06:19 PM
"I have a question, say we get into the cage, and through the security doors there and down the elevator we can't move, and passed the guards with the guns, and into the vault we can't open..."
"Without being seen by the cameras."
"Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot to mention that."
"...yeah, well say we do all that... uh... were just supposed to walk out of there with $150,000,000 in cash on us, without getting stopped?"
"Yeah."
"Oh, ok."
See how simple it is?
CirclMastr
Jun 29 2004, 06:55 PM
If nothing else, a quick trip to vegas to pick up a slave from the Mafia dealers can be interesting.
LaughingTiger
Jun 29 2004, 08:14 PM
QUOTE (Abstruse) |
- Security guards openly sitting around the like of which you'd only see in an Corp Zero Zone.
|
Openly armed and heavily armed guards are bad for business at casinos. You want people to feel welcomed, valued. You don't get that effect by having guns visible everywhere someone turns.
The nice, strong men in the well tailored suits that are so happy to get you the help you need are all the security most people see. The guys with the big guns are hidden in the passages throughout the walls of the casino and at special choke points. Try to run, and the open concourse is suddenly filled with people who would like to have a talk with you.
Planning a hit in Vegas could be a hoot, very "James Bond". Or what about having negotiating over a high stakes poker game? Or trying to win back an imporant item?
Thanks guys, I think you just gave me an idea.
Crimsondude 2.0
Jun 29 2004, 08:43 PM
QUOTE (Abstruse @ Jun 29 2004, 03:31 AM) |
- Security guards openly sitting around the like of which you'd only see in an Corp Zero Zone. |
I seriously doubt that, for the same reason they don't do it now--It kills the spirit of fun to be surrounded by a bunch of angry, heavily-armed security guards when you're trying to be naughty. [EDIT]The rest of the post just echoed LT's[/EDIT]
QUOTE (BitBasher) |
In SR Las Vegas is a lousy place to SR. Not many corporate compounds (CD2: my emphasis), and pretty much everyone is an indian. People that aren't indians stick out, and all the indians are allowed to openly carry weapons, making your life very, very difficult. Old Native American Nations books followed this. |
So... what are the casinos from a SR's POV then?
And SoNA seems to have treated Vegas differently than NAN 1 did. One of the interesting things is the sheer population dynamic in the city now versus 1990ish, esp. with the higher number of Hispanics (in a city and state whose names are Spaniohs, who'd have thought?). They focused too much on the Strip in SoNA, but there are other things to do out there, especially since it's essentially a giant Anglo Reservation in Ute and still a huge attraction spot.
PBTHHHHT
Jun 29 2004, 08:52 PM
Oh, speaking of Ocean's 11 (well, from the above quotes!
)
Looks like they're filming a part of the scene for the movie Ocean's 12 in the Ronald Reagan Building in DC during August, they want to use the lobby for a scene. Just heard this through the grapevine.
As for Las Vegas, I imagine security will be similar to what they have now but with the backups carrying even bigger guns out of sight. More riggers and astral security too. I can see some shamans working for the casinos... know of any totems that would enjoy the casino environment? Heck, even free spirits might be roaming around with all the emotions there....
Oh, can you imagine some of the hotel rooms being haunted/background count due to past events? Don't forget that there's always a few bodies that are 'dumped' in the desert.... Great way to introduce Shedim.
'Hey Nick, weren't ya supposed ta wack 'ol Jimmy?'
'yah, took him out to the desert and put a bullet to the brain.' Takes a swig of his beer.
'.... he just sat down at the end of the bar....'
'Splurrrrrtttt!!!!' Spray of liquor all over the bartop....
Solstice
Jun 30 2004, 12:03 AM
No Vegas isn't the best SR setting unless your doing they old sneak and snatch and your target is on vacation.
FlakJacket
Jun 30 2004, 01:24 AM
Unless you count that whole underworld war that they've got going on.
hunter5150
Jun 30 2004, 02:15 AM
Well I must admit that yes Oceans 11 was my inspiration for this run. I wouldnt expect to carren run in Vegas but I thought a one shot, huge take heist of a lifetime would be alot of fun. I figured to make security uber tight. I kind of wanted to see if I could design the ultimate secure system/building and see if my group could crack it. Mind you my group isnt up to that challenge as players but maybe far into the future. Just wondered what kind of sociological kinks I would need to throw in in order to make it vaguely canon.
Snow_Fox
Jun 30 2004, 02:22 AM
At the risk of dating myself, NAN1 covered Vegas. basically it makes too much revenue for the NAN to give up and os it exists as a pink skin enclave. Beyond all the existing sin now they have death sports and pretty much anything erlse you want. I'd say runs could be spying on corp wqorkers, maybe extracting acts for another cassino, sabotaging a cassino-like hit the liquor consigment or get caught up on intergang rivalry.
wet work to look like urban violence.
Take scandal pics of the latest sim starlet with her secret spouse (Hello Brittney)
Prospero
Jun 30 2004, 03:23 AM
And like the rest of that area, there's stuff going on out in the desert (at least SSG hinted that there was). So talisleggers and people who want a back-door into the Mojave, Vegas is the place.
Abstruse
Jun 30 2004, 07:36 AM
There are nicely armed guards visible in casinos now. They're just in front of the cages, at the entrances, etc. Sure, they only have pistols now, but that's in 2004. In 2063, I wouldn't be surprised to see a friggin' AK-toting mofo in every pit. And no one will bat an eye because the guards in the MALL in Shadowrun carry uzis.
The Abstruse One
Fygg Nuuton
Jun 30 2004, 09:48 AM
what happens in vegas stays in vegas... except the horrible case of awakened crabs you got. good luck with that buddy
Domino
Jun 30 2004, 10:37 AM
QUOTE (hunter5150) |
I kind of wanted to see if I could design the ultimate secure system/building and see if my group could crack it. |
Well if your design is even halfway secure using all the gadgets and techniques available in the various sourcebooks they will fail.
FlakJacket
Jun 30 2004, 03:59 PM
The question is though, would Vegas still be as big as it is today? The UCAS seems to have legalised gambling- well Seattle and Detroit have casinons. Down in the CAS New Orleans also has them. Throw in virtual casinos and that could take away a lot of customers. :/
Fygg Nuuton
Jun 30 2004, 04:33 PM
you can have gambling near water, or on water, somehting like that. detroit has a big honkin lake nearby IIRC, seattle has water too, as does new orleans
BitBasher
Jun 30 2004, 06:08 PM
QUOTE (FlakJacket) |
The question is though, would Vegas still be as big as it is today? The UCAS seems to have legalised gambling- well Seattle and Detroit have casinons. Down in the CAS New Orleans also has them. Throw in virtual casinos and that could take away a lot of customers. :/ |
QUOTE |
The question is though, would Vegas still be as big as it is today? The UCAS seems to have legalised gambling- well Seattle and Detroit have casinons. Down in the CAS New Orleans also has them. Throw in virtual casinos and that could take away a lot of customers. :/ |
All that is generally true today, additionally theres gambling in limited parts of LA, ext... None of that has put a dent in out tourism business at all yet.
LaughingTiger
Jun 30 2004, 07:41 PM
QUOTE (Abstruse) |
There are nicely armed guards visible in casinos now. They're just in front of the cages, at the entrances, etc. Sure, they only have pistols now, but that's in 2004. In 2063, I wouldn't be surprised to see a friggin' AK-toting mofo in every pit. And no one will bat an eye because the guards in the MALL in Shadowrun carry uzis.
|
Pistols mean safety.
Uzis mean terrorists.
Perception, in these cases, is 10/10ths of the law. People may expect the occasional man holding a pistol. Secruity guards have pistols, cops have pistols. But anything larger doesn't belong. SMG's, assault rifles - those tools belong to cops who hurt you, take you to jail. They belong to people who hijack airplanes and kill people.
In these situations, you want people to be comfortable, to be willing to stay awhile. You want these people to feel safe because they *know* they'll be walking out of the casino with the million dollar jackpot and they want someone to keep them safe. Guys holding "assault weapons", as people percieve them, kill that idea of safety. What could possibly be around that would require men to have guns like that? What is so tough you can't stop it with a pistol? And do you really want to be there when it shows up?
Also:
St. Louis has Casinos because we have the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers. Common vernacular for these spots o' sin are "the boats", despite at least one which is a large land based complex, with a hotel, 5 restaurants and 3 main casinos. It's nothing like Vegas, doesn't hold a candle, but it can be just as creepy. Last time I went, there was a lady sitting at a penny machine with a cigarette. I played around, had dinner, came back six hours later...
she was still there. She was there when I left, another hour later. I'm willing to bet she's still there, 8 months later.
Creepy...
Garland
Jun 30 2004, 07:49 PM
St. Louis? Friggin' Booneville out in the middle of nowhere has a casino now. There are billboards for it everywhere along the highways, presumably to lure in the RV crowd.
RangerJoe
Jun 30 2004, 07:51 PM
Does anyone else imagine corps setting up exclusive or semi-exclusive partnerships with the major casinos? What better way to control corporate population, even on vacations, than a hotel/casino that served as an enclave-away-from home? If that were the case, I would imagine one would run into many of the same problems running in Vegas that one would running in any other corporate center/enclave.
LaughingTiger
Jun 30 2004, 08:03 PM
QUOTE (Garland) |
St. Louis? Friggin' Booneville out in the middle of nowhere has a casino now. There are billboards for it everywhere along the highways, presumably to lure in the RV crowd. |
Of course, we could throw in some conspiracy thinking here.
Why would you want a casino out in the middle of nowhere? What's the point?
hmm... casinos draw large numbers of people.
these people can be at said spot for several hours and not raise suspicion.
Large ammounts of money can move through the facility without attracting undo attention.
Local law enforcement can be put on idle by biting into the idea of "it's just the casino again. Drive by with the lights on, that calms people down".
Therefore, the casino in Booneville isn't a casino at all. It's a front for a secrety gathering or sex slave dealers who use RV's as personal roving headquarters. The local police and sherriff are kept calm and sedate with their own personal supply of slaves and drugs. Local criminal organizations use it as a place to meet and move product.
And it used to be such a nice place, too.
BitBasher
Jun 30 2004, 08:14 PM
QUOTE |
Large ammounts of money can move through the facility without attracting undo attention. |
Unless they work totally different that Las Vegas, that's not true at all. Anytome a player cashes in or our for more than (IIRC) 2,000 dollars he's reported to the NGC. Anytime a single jackpot or prize is more than 1200$ it is automatically reported to the IRS, and so on. Casinos are actually fairly crappy to use to launder, because it can be done it just takes a long time.
THis however could be entirely different if the laws changed...
Garland
Jun 30 2004, 08:50 PM
QUOTE (LaughingTiger) |
Therefore, the casino in Booneville isn't a casino at all. It's a front for a secrety gathering or sex slave dealers who use RV's as personal roving headquarters. The local police and sherriff are kept calm and sedate with their own personal supply of slaves and drugs. Local criminal organizations use it as a place to meet and move product.
And it used to be such a nice place, too. |
What, no insect spirits? C'mon, now.
LaughingTiger
Jun 30 2004, 10:05 PM
QUOTE (BitBasher) |
Unless they work totally different that Las Vegas, that's not true at all. Anytome a player cashes in or our for more than (IIRC) 2,000 dollars he's reported to the NGC. Anytime a single jackpot or prize is more than 1200$ it is automatically reported to the IRS, and so on. Casinos are actually fairly crappy to use to launder, because it can be done it just takes a long time.
THis however could be entirely different if the laws changed... |
What I meant was, people on the outside wouldn't really know much is amiss if large ammounts of money moved through the facility. Not neccessarily legally, mind you, but it does provide at least something of a front.
AND it's run by Dung Beetle spirit named Skrim.
Snow_Fox
Jul 1 2004, 02:49 AM
Cassinos are good to launder because you don't have to actually win or just show up on the sec cameras and you played the small stuff all night or had a great weekend.(It's something I was trianed to look out for with clients who are potentially laundering money)
Abstruse
Jul 1 2004, 12:56 PM
$500+ in a single hit or $1000+ in a night gets reported to the IRS, and they immediately take out a chunk of it for taxes.
The Abstruse One
BitBasher
Jul 1 2004, 03:33 PM
And keep in mind to make that laundering harder you cannot gamble with actual cash. You have to change your cash in for chips, then change your chips in later for actual cash. Best case scenario is your put your actual cash on the table/in the machgine and if you win you win chips which have to be exchanged, never cash.
Thistledown
Jul 1 2004, 03:38 PM
Gambling outside of vegas and reno just isn't the same. The atmosphere is different, especially the sounds.
BitBasher
Jul 1 2004, 03:47 PM
Since I live in Vegas, that's hard for me to comment on.
Crimsondude 2.0
Jul 1 2004, 08:16 PM
I don't know. Having been to Vegas, AC, Los Angeles, and too damn many Indian casinos, they're all generally the same from my POV.
The Vegas casinos (on the Strip, as opposed to those in Downtown or off Vegas Blvd) just have nicer stuff off the gaming floor. IMO.
Solstice
Jul 1 2004, 11:01 PM
QUOTE (LaughingTiger) |
Pistols mean safety.
Uzis mean terrorists.
In these situations, you want people to be comfortable, to be willing to stay awhile. You want these people to feel safe because they *know* they'll be walking out of the casino with the million dollar jackpot and they want someone to keep them safe. Guys holding "assault weapons", as people percieve them, kill that idea of safety.
|
I disagree with you. I think guards in the 2060's would have heavier weapons like shotguns and SMGs at the least. I don't think firearms have entirely kept pace with the advancements of cyberware and body armor. Firearms are much less deadly (still deadly) in 2063 than they are today. We are just begining to develop body armor. I think that in places were there is alot of money and potential for people to get stupid that heavier weapons would be the order of the day with pistols as sidearms. I don't think people would feel safe at all without at least one assualt rifle on the floor.
QUOTE |
What could possibly be around that would require men to have guns like that? What is so tough you can't stop it with a pistol? And do you really want to be there when it shows up?
|
A troll with dermal plating, orthoskin and body armor? He would laugh at the heaviest pistol. And no I wouldn't want to be there without some anti-personnel explosives.
FlakJacket
Jul 1 2004, 11:21 PM
Which is where the rigged security system comes in. I could also see some of the security guys carrying AZ-150 stun batons for situations like this. Or the ever favourite capsule rounds with something nice and debilitating.
Most casinos I would think would use non-lethal weapons where ever possible- first to just avoid getting stains on the carpet, and because it frightens the customers less and is good PR. If it looks like non-lethal wont work then go to regular bullets, if you need something heavier like shotguns that's what the quick response teams are for. And that's not even counting the magical aspect- something that casinos are more than easily able to afford in abundance.
LaughingTiger
Jul 2 2004, 03:49 AM
QUOTE (Solstice) |
I think that in places were there is alot of money and potential for people to get stupid that heavier weapons would be the order of the day with pistols as sidearms. I don't think people would feel safe at all without at least one assualt rifle on the floor. |
Some may look at from the perspective that heavy weapons near the customers is a sign of weakness. If you have to shoot that thing, on a crowded floor, there will be other people hurt. There's simply not enough space for the bullets not to hit bystanders.
If the guys are walking around lightly armed, it can breed a sense of confidence, in that nothing bad will happen here. The security you dont' see is good enough to stop anything from reaching where you're sitting. If the guards are carrying assault rifles, it shows that they can't stop anything from making to the floor. They have to have those big guns because anybody can just walk in the room.
I'll agree to disagree.
Snow_Fox
Jul 2 2004, 10:28 PM
QUOTE (LaughingTiger) |
QUOTE (Garland @ Jun 30 2004, 02:49 PM) | St. Louis? Friggin' Booneville out in the middle of nowhere has a casino now. There are billboards for it everywhere along the highways, presumably to lure in the RV crowd. |
Of course, we could throw in some conspiracy thinking here.
Why would you want a casino out in the middle of nowhere? What's the point?
|
That is exactly why Buggsy Siegel settled on Las Vegas in the 1940's. It was nothing. A stop on the railroad in the desert. They were grateful for the business he brought in and in return they didn't monitor him too much.
As for laundering money, kids think it through. You go to Vegas or AC or Foxwoods. You do bet on the tables. Makes sure you show up on the cameras, talk to a few dealers, tip big on a bar drink. Then you bet. Nothing big, $20 on this craps table, $50 on this blackjack table,nothing big enough to set off bells and whistles, but then when you leave, when you do your taxes you "honestly" report to the IRS that you won $500 total at the differnet tables and you would like to pay the taxes on it since each particular win was too small to show up on the cassino records.Pay say $100 in taxes and the other $400 is now clean, it's laundered, no one askes where you got it from.
Anyone want me to explain who you launder money through loans and property?
Kanada Ten
Jul 2 2004, 10:47 PM
QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
You go to Vegas or AC or Foxwoods. You do bet on the tables. Makes sure you show up on the cameras, talk to a few dealers, tip big on a bar drink. Then you bet. Nothing big, $20 on this craps table, $50 on this blackjack table,nothing big enough to set off bells and whistles, but then when you leave, when you do your taxes you "honestly" report to the IRS that you won $500 total at the differnet tables and you would like to pay the taxes on it since each particular win was too small to show up on the cassino records.Pay say $100 in taxes and the other $400 is now clean, it's laundered, no one askes where you got it from. |
The issue is that you now receive a recite of the winning transaction showing how much you won. In SR, it is likely that the casino will report the wages directly to your nation's Revenue Service. This makes it necessary to doctor the casino's records, use a mafia laundering casino, or hope your case gets lost in the numbers. Otherwise the IRS computers will see a discrepancy.
Laundry operations will have "ghost" guests from poor nations stay at the casino's hotel. They report this money as profit to the IRS, even though the money is actually what you wish laundered. They then issue you a winning recite for the money you gave them less a percent to cover taxes and make a profit. The IRS won't be able to connect your earnings to the ghost guests of the hotel unless they crack the casino's operation... This is where the runners come in. They have to axe the Fed's primary witness and wipe the hard drives of the Casino right now, before the Feds find them...
BitBasher
Jul 2 2004, 10:49 PM
laundering amounts under 1000 dollars yeah, amounts under 100k are largely inconsequencial for laundering purposes really. It's laundering large sums that's the problem.
Kanada Ten
Jul 2 2004, 11:07 PM
To cover up the sale of weapons, drugs, and other services, the Mafia can use a more complicated scheme. Start with an "overseas" Insurance Company, an "overseas" Brokerage Company, and a Casino or Nightclub (though any high service and property business will work). The Casino insures everything, including the employee vehicles. They then issue insurance claims for everything from "broken" glasses, destroyed property like cars and blankets, and so on. It quickly adds up to millions of nuyen. The Insurance Company pays the money needed to be laundered to the Casino to replace or fix the imaginary goods. The Brokerage Company issues a recite for the goods to the Casino. The Casino is now free to use the laundered money given to it by the Insurance Company. Which really sucks for the runners hired to steal a shipment of Plasma Screens headed for Whitehorse Casino that turns out to be 1000 Keys of Mafia Novacoke.
If you want to protect the scheme further you need a bank.
FlakJacket
Jul 3 2004, 12:47 AM
QUOTE (Snow_Fox) |
Anyone want me to explain who you launder money through loans and property? |
Yeah, I'd be interested. Always good to learn something new. Mostly.
Abstruse
Jul 3 2004, 12:19 PM
The casino is good for laundering cash as well. Have a bunch of sequential bills or bills that could otherwise be marked? Slip them in with the casino's massive stockpiles of cash, and it gets spread out over who knows how many hundreds or thousands of people. This, of course, is if you either own or have pull with the casino itself.
The Abstruse One
Snow_Fox
Jul 4 2004, 02:50 AM
Kanda has started it. To do big money you need help from an institution that has access to large amounts of money and is willing to lie.
For example, you are a mobster who has
100k from dealing BTL's. How do you justify this to the IRS? You have a friend who works in the finance office of a church. You make an "anonymous" donation to the office through your friend on the inside.They don't have to report it. You then apply for a loan of :nuyen:100k from the church. You offer up a warehouse as collateral. You friend on the inside knows there's no warehouse, but approves the loan.
You now have a source for the income when the IRS asks where did it come from? I took a loan, and here's the paperwork. you may then invest or spend the money in legitimate works.
You never pay the loan back, and your friend inside "erases" the donantion and loan from the org records so auditors don't find it, and no one there goes looking ofr the money or the loan because they never knew it existed.
This is way simplified but you get the idea.
Another idea is if you invest in mutual funds, the
100k. Leave the money in for a week or two in a fund that doesn't pay much in the way of dividends, something agressive, and withdraw it. Pay the honest taxes on the capital gains and tell the IRS it had been in there for years. They don't care when it went in or came out and cost balances don't go into the date's on the tax reporting forms, they just list cost basis (what you put in) and capital gains(how much it went up)
In a market like the last few years, where it went way down and then way up it would not be too out there for someone to have almost no capital gains "I lost a lot of money and took it out when I got back my investment."