SykoBear
Mar 30 2005, 11:18 AM
Hi guys,
I will be the first to admit that this may be absolute wishful thinking on my part. What I am about to put up is by no means a concrete theory, just an argument based on several pieces of circumstantial evidence.
Having said that, I think that the announcement of SR4 is an April Fool's Joke. Here's the reason why:
(1) SR4 was announced on March 15 - a mere two weeks from April 1. Enough time for speculation to run rife. Enough time for people to get their knickers in a twist. The argument here is not the choice of March 15 - it's the fact that MANY other dates could have been chosen for the announcement. Why choose one so close to April Fool's Day?
Yes, I'm aware that it was supposed to be announced in the GAMA Trade Fair - my bad if I'm wrong.
(2) Fanpro does have a history of pulling pranks on us, the SR gamers. I cite the example a year (a couple of years?) back where Shadowrun D20 was announced, also as an April Fool's Joke. Again, the modus operandi matches the current one - announce it mid-March, get people's knickers in a twist, announce the joke on April 1.
(3) Here's a fairly telling fact - Loose Alliances is still listed in the Shadowrun RPG site as a product that's about to be released. -If- SR4 has been in development for about a year, then the date chosen to announce the release of SR4 makes even less sense - because it's almost certain to impact the sales of Loose Alliances negatively.
The basis - new rules material in Loose Alliances will become outdated a mere three months after it's released.
I am, of course, assuming that Loose Alliances has no sneak peeks of SR4 material. This is an acknowledged flaw in my own argument.
So here it is. My patched-together argument based off a hunch. Please feel free to tear this apart if you so choose.
RunnerPaul
Mar 30 2005, 11:34 AM
QUOTE (SykoBear) |
(1) SR4 was announced on March 15 - a mere two weeks from April 1. |
And yet, if you go back to the FAQ they posted on March 1st, they'd taken out the wording "there are no plans for SR4 at this time."
And you're probably going to get a lot of flak for this thread. Don't worry, it's just because you're still in Stage 1 of dealing with SR4, Denial, and many of us are already on Stage 2: Anger, Stage 3: Bargining, or Stage 4: Depression. There's a handful who are on Stage 5: Accpetance, but they get hassled by the 2s, 3s, and 4s even worse than the Stage 1s get hassled
Demosthenes
Mar 30 2005, 11:35 AM
A joke?
You've managed to miss the discussions where people
playtesting the game have posted?
And Patrick Goodman's blog?
And the DevBlog on FanPro's website?
And the previous topic with almost this exact title?
It's rather a lot of effort, don't you think, for an April Fool joke?
As far as I know, it
was announced at the GAMA trade fair...and I don't think RPG companies play April Fool tricks on the rest of the trade...
[Edit]You might want to grab yourself a flame-retardant suit their, laddie...[/edit]
SykoBear
Mar 30 2005, 12:21 PM
QUOTE |
And Patrick Goodman's blog? And the DevBlog on FanPro's website? |
Erhm....no I didn't. But I'd have to say, it is a lot less effort to post on a blog than develop, say, a whole website (complete with nice artwork and all) when Shadowrun D20 was supposedly announced - and that was later revealed also as an April Fool's Joke.
QUOTE |
And the previous topic with almost this exact title? |
I did. My bad.
QUOTE |
It's rather a lot of effort, don't you think, for an April Fool joke? |
Perhaps. I'm trying to address some niggling doubts I have about the timing of this announcement. So no, I don't particularly want to troll, I don't want to be flamed, I certainly don't want a 6 figure consulting salary for taking over artistic direction of Shadowrun.
In any case, I'll find out in two day's time and skip straight to Stage 4.
Demosthenes
Mar 30 2005, 12:34 PM
It has been 15 days, you know.
The last time FanPro did an April Fool joke, they put it up on April 1st, not March 15th...
Still, stay sceptical.
I don't mind.
If I'm right, and you're wrong, I have to spend more money when August rolls around.
If you're right and I'm wrong...then I've just made a fool of myself.
nothing new there...
At least I'm in good (-ish) company...
[Edit]
Patrick Goodman's playtesting blogSince I asked if you'd seen it, I figured I should give you a link.
Patrick Goodman
Mar 30 2005, 01:16 PM
Damn you, Demosthenes!! You just remind me that I need to work on the blasted thing one of these days! Damn wedding plans getting in the way of important stuff....
SykoBear
Mar 30 2005, 01:30 PM
Thanks! For the comments and the link.
mintcar
Mar 30 2005, 02:05 PM
This is not a joke. Because I canīt imagine anyone laughing if it was.
(eccept the few who still hope it is a joke)
Demonseed Elite
Mar 30 2005, 02:12 PM
It. is. not. a. joke.
Period. No joke to be found!
Loose Alliances, Shadows of Asia, Shadows of Latin America, these books will not be invalidated by SR4 because they are pretty much entirely source and setting material. In fact, those books will likely contain seeds that will become more detailed in SR4.
apollo124
Mar 30 2005, 02:07 PM
Further evidence that it is not a joke, go to Battlecorps and download the Fanpro 2005 catalog. It's free and has several pages of new SR4 material listed.
http://battlecorps.com/catalog/index.php?c...70f6d963ed43d08
Demosthenes
Mar 30 2005, 02:43 PM
QUOTE (Patrick Goodman) |
Damn you, Demosthenes!! You just remind me that I need to work on the blasted thing one of these days! Damn wedding plans getting in the way of important stuff.... |
Always happy to be of service.
Seriously: wedding plans are more important...
Well, almost as important.
SykoBear
Mar 30 2005, 02:45 PM
Pardon me while I skip directly to step 4. -sigh-
Patrick Goodman
Mar 30 2005, 02:54 PM
QUOTE (Demosthenes) |
Seriously: wedding plans are more important... Well, almost as important. |
Don't tell that to my fiancee; she's stressing enough as it is.
Patrick Goodman
Mar 30 2005, 02:54 PM
QUOTE (SykoBear) |
Pardon me while I skip directly to step 4. -sigh- |
Might I ask why?
Aku
Mar 30 2005, 03:11 PM
QUOTE (Patrick Goodman) |
QUOTE (SykoBear @ Mar 30 2005, 08:45 AM) | Pardon me while I skip directly to step 4. -sigh- |
Might I ask why?
|
perhaps he doesnt feel the need to be/do
QUOTE |
2: Anger, Stage 3: Bargining |
personally,t he only reason i'm upset over it, is because i just bought my copies of the BBB and matrix ( my first two books) within the past 3-6 months.
Skeptical Clown
Mar 30 2005, 03:17 PM
Setting material and rules were almost completely divorced in SR3 (which I think was probably a mistake), so there's no reason that setting books wouldn't be easily adapted to new rules.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 03:16 PM
Found this on the internet
The new and improved SR4
Adam
Mar 30 2005, 04:45 PM
QUOTE |
As far as I know, it was announced at the GAMA trade fair...and I don't think RPG companies play April Fool tricks on the rest of the trade |
Scarily enough, when talking with some retailers about April Fool's jokes [and recieving mad props for our execution of the SRd20 joke...], one of them mentioned to me that a customer came into his store just last week and asked if SRd20 was out yet.
Last year, I did take the preventative step of posting in advance on a couple of manufacturer/retailer forums to let them know that SRd20 was a joke.
Parts of working in the game business are "fun and games" -- other parts are not.
apollo124
Mar 30 2005, 05:06 PM
Aristotle
Mar 30 2005, 05:13 PM
If it were a joke, and I so highly doubt it, I think the joke would be on those pulling it. The outrage has been limited to a vocal minority (not saying you guys aren't important) and a fairly large number of the fans represented here seem hopeful about the new edition.
Backgammon
Mar 30 2005, 05:55 PM
I'm not usually sensitive to this kind of stuff, but I find it wrong for someone to allude that SR4 is shit, considering IT'S NOT OUT YET and the hard work people I consider competant are putting into it. "It's a joke"... well, not funny.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 06:17 PM
The actual joke was perpetrated by members of my gaming group.
It stemmed from a discussion about the fact that I buy EVERYTHING for shadowrun, and that i would in fact buy SR4 even if it does turn out to be drek.
but you gotta admit it does make you smile...
GrinderTheTroll
Mar 30 2005, 06:11 PM
QUOTE (RunnerPaul) |
And you're probably going to get a lot of flak for this thread. Don't worry, it's just because you're still in Stage 1 of dealing with SR4, Denial, and many of us are already on Stage 2: Anger, Stage 3: Bargining, or Stage 4: Depression. There's a handful who are on Stage 5: Accpetance, but they get hassled by the 2s, 3s, and 4s even worse than the Stage 1s get hassled |
OMFG, that's funny.
Patrick Goodman
Mar 30 2005, 06:28 PM
QUOTE (Grimtooth) |
but you gotta admit it does make you smile... |
Well...no. It made me go off on a lengthy tirade in my blog, which I erased before posting because it wouldn't do any damn good. But it did not, in fact, make me smile.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 06:36 PM
my work here is done...
Tomahawk
Mar 30 2005, 06:49 PM
QUOTE (Patrick Goodman) |
QUOTE (Grimtooth @ Mar 30 2005, 12:17 PM) | but you gotta admit it does make you smile... |
Well...no. It made me go off on a lengthy tirade in my blog, which I erased before posting because it wouldn't do any damn good. But it did not, in fact, make me smile.
|
QUOTE |
Well...no. It made me go off on a lengthy tirade in my blog, which I erased before posting because it wouldn't do any damn good. But it did not, in fact, make me smile. |
Well as one of the perpetrators of the joke...it was mostly on Grimtooth. Quite honestly I don't know what to think of SR4. Some stuff I hear sounds rather cheesy and other sounds pretty good.
Seems to me everyone is taking things a tad to seriously (why we did that for Grimtooth). FanPro has the right to try to make some actual money from the product. And quite honestly they are not making from the license what they will by releasing a new version...and it's in their best interest not to drive off the playerbase. Have some faith
Seems we have a population of overwhelming pessimists and serious optimists who won't see eye to eye on it anyway though
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 06:46 PM
Another member of my group suggested that Wizkids pull a "WoTC" and head straight to SR4.5 by combining SR1, SR2, SR3, and SR4 in to one big-assed all you can eat special for the unheard of low low price of 79.95.
While supplies last
Not available in stores
Void where prohibited
Not valid with any other offer
Penta
Mar 30 2005, 06:55 PM
We're just nervous. SR is like a favorite teddy bear. Someone messing with it is bad.
Tomahawk
Mar 30 2005, 07:02 PM
QUOTE (Penta) |
We're just nervous. SR is like a favorite teddy bear. Someone messing with it is bad. |
QUOTE |
We're just nervous. SR is like a favorite teddy bear. Someone messing with it is bad. |
Oh I understand. It took me a while but I've come to love the SR setting. I'm particularly nervous of the posts that seem to allude that it is going to be going toward a less magical setting. The reason I don't play cyberpunk anymore is because Cyberpunk in and of itself bores the heck out of me. But the setting and the history of Shadowrun make it far more entertaining.
An all out effort to erase IE's or GD's would rub me the wrong way. Rarely use them but they are part and parcel of the setting in my mind.
Demonseed Elite
Mar 30 2005, 07:13 PM
There is as much feedback that comes in from people saying Shadowrun is becoming too magical as there is from people saying they fear the downplay of magical elements. Really, the game is about the balance, and that balance will be maintained in SR4.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 07:38 PM
This pretty much sum everything up in one neat little package
"He who can balance a tack hammer on his head can head off his opponent with a balanced attack!"
There now feel better.
torzzzzz
Mar 30 2005, 07:39 PM
Tomahawk
Mar 30 2005, 07:39 PM
QUOTE (Demonseed Elite @ Mar 30 2005, 07:13 PM) |
There is as much feedback that comes in from people saying Shadowrun is becoming too magical as there is from people saying they fear the downplay of magical elements. Really, the game is about the balance, and that balance will be maintained in SR4. |
I don't honestly see that. I think magic has mostly been scaled back over the life of SR3...and the most vocal people seem to be those who complain about magic in SR.
I guess I just think scrapping huge portions of the history like they never happened or coming up with excuses why they happened seems lame to me.
Edit: I should say that I have no idea if this is the plan or not. Just I see this suggestion regularly
I have no idea what the plans are.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 07:46 PM
Don't get me wrong.
I absolutely LOVE SR top to bottom beginning to end.
SR was the greatest thing since sliced bread
SR2 was a breath of fresh air.
SR3 was little more than a stagnant breeze
SR4 remains to be seen.
Will I buy it?
The collector in me says i have to.
Adam
Mar 30 2005, 07:57 PM
QUOTE |
I guess I just think scrapping huge portions of the history like they never happened or coming up with excuses why they happened seems lame to me. |
The history is NOT being retroactively changed.
Tomahawk
Mar 30 2005, 07:53 PM
QUOTE |
The history is NOT being retroactively changed. |
Good
Adam
Mar 30 2005, 07:55 PM
Allow me to make a suggestion: Don't pay attention to anything anyone says on DSF, and just read ShadowrunRPG.com and other official material.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 08:30 PM
Adam makes a good point.
But for those of us with the stubborn streak who like to gripe and complain, and for those who are wondering where the cheese went, just keep posting.
Tomahawk
Mar 30 2005, 08:28 PM
QUOTE (Adam) |
Allow me to make a suggestion: Don't pay attention to anything anyone says on DSF, and just read ShadowrunRPG.com and other official material. |
It's amazing the collection of people you can make where everyone has love of the game in common but can't agree on anything
Adam
Mar 30 2005, 08:41 PM
QUOTE (Grimtooth @ Mar 30 2005, 03:30 PM) |
But for those of us with the stubborn streak who like to gripe and complain, and for those who are wondering where the cheese went, just keep posting. |
That's what I'm saying: post away, but don't mistake anything you read here for official or the final word, especially when it's not coming from a FanPro employee.
Grimtooth
Mar 30 2005, 08:38 PM
I can't help it. I like a good argument even when i don't have a leg to stand on.
Right Tomahawk?
Spookymonster
Mar 30 2005, 08:46 PM
QUOTE (Adam) |
QUOTE | I guess I just think scrapping huge portions of the history like they never happened or coming up with excuses why they happened seems lame to me. |
The history is NOT being retroactively changed.
|
So does this mean the Kingdome will still be standing in in the Seattle of 2070? Or would removing it be considered an un-retroactive (protractive?) change?
SykoBear
Mar 31 2005, 01:58 AM
Whoa! You go to sleep for 8 hours and....just wow!
Well, the reason I'm depressed is really a financial one. I love SR to bits (probably in the same way a drug addict loves his next fix to bits).
Apart from the nervousness it's causing me from taking away a system I took a lot of effort to master, I'm going back to school this year, and I'll be moving halfway across the world to go back to school. So, yeah, spare cash is going to be hard to come across.
I digress.
So what's this year's April Fool's Joke gonna be?
Sandoval Smith
Mar 31 2005, 03:47 AM
SR 5th Edition, D20.
Tanka
Mar 31 2005, 03:54 AM
QUOTE (Sandoval Smith) |
SR 5th Edition, D20. |
"Alert! MDK in progress!"
Smiley
Mar 31 2005, 05:15 AM
I doubt SR4 is an April Fool's joke.
Shadow
Mar 31 2005, 05:47 AM
QUOTE (Demonseed Elite) |
It. is. not. a. joke.
Period. No joke to be found!
Loose Alliances, Shadows of Asia, Shadows of Latin America, these books will not be invalidated by SR4 because they are pretty much entirely source and setting material. In fact, those books will likely contain seeds that will become more detailed in SR4. |
Actually they will. The time line is advancing 5 years flat. That means all the information in all the books published before SR4 will just be history. No more important to the setting and the story than 'And then it came to pass'....
RunnerPaul
Mar 31 2005, 06:49 AM
QUOTE (Shadow) |
[That means all the information in all the books published before SR4 will just be history. No more important to the setting and the story than 'And then it came to pass'.... |
You seem to have a curious definition of "important to the setting and story", at least from where I'm sitting.
Critias
Mar 31 2005, 07:16 AM
Just let Shadow continue to wallow in his depression and righteous indignation. Nothing anyone says -- before or likely after SR4's release -- is going to change his mind; if he wants to be miserable, let him.
Synner
Mar 31 2005, 07:31 AM
QUOTE (Shadow @ Mar 31 2005, 05:47 AM) |
QUOTE (Demonseed Elite @ Mar 30 2005, 05:12 AM) | Loose Alliances, Shadows of Asia, Shadows of Latin America, these books will not be invalidated by SR4 because they are pretty much entirely source and setting material. In fact, those books will likely contain seeds that will become more detailed in SR4. |
Actually they will. The time line is advancing 5 years flat. That means all the information in all the books published before SR4 will just be history.
|
Let's see if this gets through once and for all. There will be changes and developments to the setting, there's no denying that - in fact most will be a rooted in material from LA, SoA, SoLA and of course System Failure, although some will inevitably be surprises (after all what's a new edition without surprises).
However, hard as it may be to believe 90% of the material in Loose Alliances and the latest Shadows of will remain valid, consistent and useful. In fact IMHO people who don't pick them up now, are going to come back later and pick them up.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.