Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: [LooseAlliances] Loose Alliances
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Critias
QUOTE (mfb)
so, lemme get this straight. playing a character who supports fascism is no-no, but playing a character who kills people for a living is okey-dokey...?

As long as he wears shades, has a gun in each hand, and says "no women, no kids" all the time, sure.
Raskolnikov
That's sexist!
hermit
QUOTE
As long as he wears shades, has a gun in each hand, and says "no women, no kids" all the time, sure.

He doesn't need shades. But a pot plant would be nice. And a 12-year-old Nathalie Portman sidekick.
Penta
I should probably revisit what I wrote, as it looks like it got misinterpreted.

2 and 3 (political stuff) aren't gamebreakers. They just annoy. SR books lately have felt like the authors are pushing their personal politics...Which is OK for novels, but bad for game boooks.

Could I give examples? No. But they've felt like it, and it does grate.

1, however, is a gamebreaker. If I presented either communists or actual fascists as a serious threat, most Americans, even SR players, would look at me like I had a few extra heads or would throw me in an insane asylum.

It seems as though SR books lately aren't operating merely from a different POV (like earlier books did), but a different universe altogether.

I mean, it used to be that you could take for granted that books were written from a North American perspective, with the implicit knowledge therein.

Lately, books have felt like they're written from Berlin or Munich. While that might be nice for Europeans, I can't identify with it. I can't even turn that sort of a viewpoint into something North Americans (my players) could understand.

It's why fiction hardly crosses cultures very well, folks.smile.gif
audun
QUOTE (hermit)
QUOTE
As long as he wears shades, has a gun in each hand, and says "no women, no kids" all the time, sure.

He doesn't need shades. But a pot plant would be nice. And a 12-year-old Nathalie Portman sidekick.

cool.gif

Let's end the fascism discussion now. It's off topic to a large degree. Everyone agrees that fascism is stupid and that the quote from LA should have been phrased otherwise. IMO players that are attracted to fascism ought to examine history, not their heads. I'm militantly anti-fa, but I don't necessarily consider fascists and nazies as crazy. Some are, but insane people aren't as dangerous (in the long run) as sane people doing insane things.
Penta
There's very little point being militantly anti-fascist, methinks.

Most people grow out of such things.

The rest, well...We have jobs, they don't.smile.gif
hermit
QUOTE
1, however, is a gamebreaker. If I presented either communists or actual fascists as a serious threat, most Americans, even SR players, would look at me like I had a few extra heads or would throw me in an insane asylum.

Just because some (I wouldn't go so far as to say most, especially with fascism), Americans are blind on that spot doesn't mean everyone is, nor does everyone have to cope with some Americans' selective blindness.

QUOTE
Could I give examples? No. But they've felt like it, and it does grate.

You see, if you make a controversial point, please provide examples. Saying "I can't say why, but they do" won't convince anyone.

QUOTE
I mean, it used to be that you could take for granted that books were written from a North American perspective, with the implicit knowledge therein.
Lately, books have felt like they're written from Berlin or Munich. While that might be nice for Europeans, I can't identify with it. I can't even turn that sort of a viewpoint into something North Americans (my players) could understand.
It's why fiction hardly crosses cultures very well, folks.

.... so you're actually demanding SR remain "US property"? Well, maybe if more Americans would actually write stuff for SR, you'd get your thoroughly Americanised SR you seem to think is true SR. Nevermind that about half of SR's market isn't even in NA (and that at least SoE would likely have been a disaster if it had only been written with "an American perspective"). Demanding that is narrow-minded and selfish.
Fiction indeed crosses cultures, so long as the reader does keep an open mind.

QUOTE
There's very little point being militantly anti-fascist, methinks. Most people grow out of such things. The rest, well...We have jobs, they don't.

They kill people. That is a crime, in America as well as anywhere else, is it?
Besides, the SA was made up out of unemployed hoodlums, too. Yeah, they grew out of their follies alright.

I guess we should agree to disagree now, though. Neither will you convince me, nor I you, so let's end this here. smile.gif
Crimsondude 2.0
So, how 'bout them archaeologists?
Penta
Gee, hermit. I love how my comments have absolutely no legitimacy in your mind....

<sigh>

Crimson:

They're disturbing my grandpa's grave AND holding up my highway!:-)
Synner
QUOTE (Penta @ May 24 2005, 09:13 PM)
2 and 3 (political stuff) aren't gamebreakers. They just annoy. SR books lately have felt like the authors are pushing their personal politics...Which is OK for novels, but bad for game books.

If anything all the political factions in Loose Alliances are given a dark perspective even the eco-groups. That's because the Sixth World is dystopic and the characters that live on it's shadow side (ie. the ones that post on Shadowland documents) are particularly exposed to the darker aspects of these groups agendas.

QUOTE
Could I give examples? No. But they've felt like it, and it does grate.

That is a matter of opinion. I know you haven't appreciated the mention of religion in SR either, particularly Catholicism. I've had enough appreciative mail for the section in SoE that I know it was a good call including it and many people appreciated the nuanced approach rather than the black and white one that had been the norm. I was overjoyed to see the Islamics in this book given an intelligent and informed overview (none of this Shiites are evil crap) by both an American and a European writers.

Personally I think a lot of people appreciate a look at what real-world politics could evolve into in a dark future. Shadowrun is a game about hardened criminals often performing amoral and unethical acts, I see no reason why it has to be politically correct.

I agree with Crimson that a different balance might have been struck, but I disagree with anyone who thinks politics should be a taboo simply because some people aren't interested or willing to deal with it. As someone said in one of the first posts, this book doesn't cater to the lowest common denominator. If you're not interested into getting politics shoved in your face don't by a sourcebook which dedicates fully a third of its pages to politics (and this time the index was up long enough in advance).

QUOTE
1, however, is a gamebreaker. If I presented either communists or actual fascists as a serious threat, most Americans, even SR players, would look at me like I had a few extra heads or would throw me in an insane asylum.

That's a very sad thing to hear, since real fascists at least are very much a real threat in many parts of the real world (and the court's still out on communists).

QUOTE
It seems as though SR books lately aren't operating merely from a different POV (like earlier books did), but a different universe altogether.

Maybe you're just getting a broader picture than you're used to. Some people might consider that a good thing.

QUOTE
I mean, it used to be that you could take for granted that books were written from a North American perspective, with the implicit knowledge therein.

Or lack thereof. Or political correctness. Or simply fear of pushing the wrong buttons. In that regard I thank heaven the roleplaying audience has aged because it means its mature enough to face some challenging issues and use them in their roleplaying. Hell, I'm still surprised we got away with presenting the fundamentals of Wicca the way we did in SOTA64 without hearing some kneejerk reactionary spouting off about us "promoting paganism".

QUOTE
Lately, books have felt like they're written from Berlin or Munich. While that might be nice for Europeans, I can't identify with it. I can't even turn that sort of a viewpoint into something North Americans (my players) could understand.

Why Berlin or Munich? Why not Warsaw, Paris, Lisbon, London, Thailand, Uruguay, Osaka and Seoul? And why restrict ourselves to a politically correct American sensibility? Why not step on a few toes?

From what I've spoken with him in the past, I'm pretty sure even Crimson will agree with me that this should be perfectly valid terrain even if he doesn't agree with certain options taken.

QUOTE
It's why fiction hardly crosses cultures very well, folks.smile.gif

That is blatantly untrue and I'll call you on examples.
Penta
The best-seller lists in the US and Germany.smile.gif

However, Synner, you're right in a lot of ways...

Re fascism/communism: Yeah, but it still feels very remote. Mostly that's because America doesn't have the bans Europe does. I think part of why fascism is so popular in Europe is...because it's banned. Ergo, instant teenage rebellion attractor!

It ain't banned here. It still draws out the counter-demos, but it isn't banned. It isn't seen as a threat to anybody.

Meanwhile, communism is strictly the province of dull-headed college kids here. It never did catch on.

So it...just doesn't feel relevant.

I'm not afraid of stepping on toes, actually...I just want books I can understand, and I'm not an idiot. Is that so wrong?smile.gif I still think that there could have been *much* better coverage given to North American-dominated (NOT exclusively NA, but mostly NA) stuff like racial issues, nativist/anti-immigration stuff, and groups like the ACLU, Moral Majority, etc.

I'll grant that my reaction may be a backlash from what has basically been a sustained period of "Americans are evil" in the media, particularly online.

However, some of it is a distinct cultural difference. (I'm still someone who thinks SR4 should put a metric-imperial conversion table in somewhere.smile.gif) The fact that that seemed to get brushed off earlier (as in "Well, yeah; Evolve, primates!" which seemed to be the vibe I was getting from Hermit) was...annoying. Finally. I always thought Captain Chaos was in Seattle...When did thi9ngs suddenly shift international? Why no foreshadowung? Why so sudden? (I don't like sudden surprises. Surprises scare me. (They usually involve clowns, who are just scary...smile.gif))

(Y'know, now that these books are done, are there any others that are planning to run headlong into fire like these on the schedule, or will we be getting back to the universally-appreciated murder, mayhem, and criminality SR is known and loved for?smile.gif)

(And, a side-thought: Just *how* does one become a playtester or freelancer?)
Synner
Last time I looked at the fiction book charts the Da Vinci Code topped the American and German (and French) ones, but granted that was a while ago. I hear the current flavor of the month is Paulo Coelho. Every country in Europe is showing CSI and Desperate Housewives, and I won't even get into music and film...

Also the fact that translations are involved and books are seldom released simulanteously means looking at book charts particularly useless. Overall sales indicate you are wrong at least when it comes to American fiction consumed in Germany (and in Europe in general). The opposite dynamic however I will refrain from commenting on, since it seems to be an American problem not a European one.

Captain Chaos is and remains in Seattle, but running on the global stage has been on the cards for quite a while and almost all the books since before Blood in the Boardroom have tried to gently open people's horizons in that respect. It's also part of the effort to respect a certain level of believability, after all how many shadowruns can you realistically have in Seattle at any given time.

The next few books will also inevitably touch controversial issues although neither Shadows of Asia nor Shadows of Latin America go very far beyond what we've seen in SoNA and SoE (although Tir Tairngire, Quebec, Ute, Switzerland and TNO could be seen as toeing the line). However, with SoA including the troubled Middle East, war-torn South East Asia, imperialistic Japan and a neo-fascist Russia you should expect to see some edgy stuff.

In fact if you read the Shadows of in conjunction with Loose Alliances you'll probably benefit significantly from the cross over potential and the crossed references. Reread Switzerland in light of some of the Anti-meta material in LA.. Look for the various threads involving the neo-aristos in SoE after reading LA. SoNA has multiple references to a group which in LA is revealed to be White Resistance. SoA and SoLA will feature even more links with stuff in almost all the chapters.

System Failure, in this respect similar to books such as Year of the Comet or Blood in the Boardroom, will cover a wide range of things from down and dirty shadowrunning to some pretty massive events. I'd say it won't be as controversial as Loose Alliances in terms of subjects but rather in terms of content.

After that comes SR4 and from what's been announced of the release schedule after that it's pretty much back to basics for a while which should make you happy.

Regarding becoming a freelancer I suggest doing what I did. Check the official website for the submission guidelines and pitch something that fits in one of the books in the upcoming release schedule (or pitch a whole book, that's what I did smile.gif ). Granted that right now everything up to SR4 is pretty much wrapped, but there should be announcements about what to expect after Street Magic and the introductory adventure set after GenCon.
Penta
Yeah, I should note that I'm waiting on a lot of the latest books from Amazon.frown.gif

Synner, you missed one of my other questions...Becoming a playtester.

I'm not a writer, but I'm good at picking something to death and back.smile.gif

Edit: No, it doesn't go the other way. Stuff might be translated from English to German, but it *almost never* goes the other way. SR being a great example here.smile.gif

Which is why I say cultural imperialism has thus far gone one only one way.

Until we start seeing the latest German sitcoms dubbed and translated into English, I doubt it'll change.
Synner
QUOTE (Penta @ May 24 2005, 10:49 PM)
Yeah, I should note that I'm waiting on a lot of the latest books from Amazon.frown.gif

Try Stiggybaby's, Amazon is inexplicably and unjustifiably crap with SR stuff on both sides of the Atlantic.

QUOTE
Synner, you missed one of my other questions...Becoming a playtester.

I didn't reply to that because I honestly don't know. I got into the playtesting by being one of the freelancers and asking, so my experience is pretty much useless as a reference.

QUOTE
Edit: No, it doesn't go the other way. Stuff might be translated from English to German, but it *almost never* goes the other way. SR being a great example here.smile.gif
Which is why I say cultural imperialism has thus far gone one only one way.
Until we start seeing the latest German sitcoms dubbed and translated into English, I doubt it'll change.

Forget German, you don't even get most of the superb British sitcoms and series (although I know BBC America is turning into a sleeper hit on cable) - I still can't get over how they butchered the American version of "Coupling" by being politically correct. The British one is exceptionally well written.

But getting back on track. Forget starting with something big. Why not start with something small, say, something like roleplaying games...
hermit
QUOTE
If anything all the political factions in Loose Alliances are given a dark perspective even the eco-groups.

.... and that's how it SHOULD BE. Besides, eco groups aren't all shiny and nice IRL either.

QUOTE
That's a very sad thing to hear, since real fascists at least are very much a real threat in many parts of the real world (and the court's still out on communists).

Indeed. Even to Americans. Two examples:
FARC, Colombia. A hardcore communist militia and the prime enemy of America in fighting narcotics trade and narcoterrirism. It is very much alive, controls a third of Colombia, and has repeatedly attempted to gain BC weapons. It also exports hundreds of tons of coke to America every year. Coke which is sold to your school children. These people aren'T a threat? Please.
As for fascism ... take Al Quaida. Take Hamas. Take the PLO. Take Syria (beginning to see a pattern?). Islamism is basically fascism with islamic attire, nothing more and nothing less.

QUOTE
I still think that there could have been *much* better coverage given to North American-dominated (NOT exclusively NA, but mostly NA) stuff like racial issues, nativist/anti-immigration stuff, and groups like the ACLU, Moral Majority, etc.

Actually, if it weren't for the US, europeans would think Christian fundamentalism about as much fo an issue as Americans seem to see fascism and communism. america has, however, demonstrated to us that christian fundamentalism is anything but dead. For example the Moral Majority. Bush's Faith Based Initiative.

Nativist/anti-Immigrant is by and large the same as fascism (like the Nationale Aktion in Germany).

As for racial issues ... those are unique to the US indeed, but in SR canon, it is said that they've lost controversy over UGE and the likes. Y'know, like "White and Black decided to put back their differences and go bash green together", as Terry Pratchett so nicely put it. Personally, I think that's a bit absurd, but it's canon, so *shrug*.

QUOTE

Re fascism/communism: Yeah, but it still feels very remote. Mostly that's because America doesn't have the bans Europe does. I think part of why fascism is so popular in Europe is...because it's banned. Ergo, instant teenage rebellion attractor!

That plays into it too. But, from my personal experience from visits to the states, fascist ideology is handled far more openly (and has a far greater deal of acceptance) in the US in general. That's not intended to come over as an attck (really, it isn't), it's just an observation I made. Noone in Europe could get away with publishing a study that (based on fake and bent data) states that Blacks are stupider than Whites, genetically. The president of Harward would have been fried for less than what he said at that press conference. And a politican who states that "Jews should be grateful we bother to help Israel, and emigrate there quickly becausde we need them there for our prophecies to come true" could as well jump off a cliff, because that's political suicide. The atmosphere here is more anti-fascist (and anti-nazi) in general, overall. Of coruse, there're also nazi and fascist subcultures. And there's a greater acceptance of fascism in Italy than Nazism in Germany (well, the West, not the East).

QUOTE
Hell, I'm still surprised we got away with presenting the fundamentals of Wicca the way we did in SOTA64 without hearing some kneejerk reactionary spouting off about us "promoting paganism".

I'm glad you took that chance, and assigned soemone with a decent background on the topic with writing (the author who wrote this was wiccan herself, or am I mistaken there?). Also, The gaming audience tends to be religiously less intolerant than the mainstream, or at least, that's my impression.

I'm more surprised you got away with the sex chapter in SOTA '63. That was something I had actually not expected to be in any book published (at least in part) for the North American market, simply because of fear of the backlash. Guess I was mistaken there.

All in all, I don't like political correctness. One of the things I like the SR books for is their disregard for that and the will to adress touchy subjects without resorting to nerdy D&D-ish struggleing to avoid anything uncorrect (and compensate with a massive amount of images of big-breasted women in - nipple-less - chainmail bras)

QUOTE
The best-seller lists in the US and Germany.

For all it's worth: Der Spiegel top 20 of this week (US authors marked in red):
1. Dan Brown - Sakrileg
2. Dan Brown - Diabolus
Paulo Coelho - Der Zahir
François Lelord - Hectors Reise
François Lelord - Hector und die Geheimnisse der Liebe
Henning Mankell - Tiefe
Cecelia Ahern - Für immer vielleicht
Matthew Stover - Star Wars Episode III - Die Rache der Sith
Alina Reyes - Die siebte Nacht
Frank Schätzing - Der Schwarm
Eoin Colfer - Artemis Fowl - Die Rache
Santo Cilauro/Tom Gleisner/Rob Sitch - Molwanîen *
John Grisham - Die Begnadigung
Anna Gavalda - Zusammen ist man weniger allein
Iny Lorentz - Die Kastellanin
Patricia Cornwell - Staub
Paulo Coelho - Der Alchimist
Ian Caldwell/Dustin Thomason - Das letzte Geheimnis
Nedjma - Die Mandel
Marcelle Sauvageot - Fast ganz die Deine
*Sorta, it's a multinational authors team

QUOTE
Until we start seeing the latest German sitcoms dubbed and translated into English, I doubt it'll change.

Hope, no PRAY you never have to watch that crap. There's a reason why all US shows are instant hits, but all German shows flop.

Mourn if you cannot watch Coupling the way it should be, though. And hate those PC zealots for that.
Raskolnikov
Cultural exchange has not been an entirely one-way street, or maybe that's American Kanji on the street racers.

Asian design, british rock, european fasions, scandinavian EBM.
Synner
QUOTE (hermit @ May 24 2005, 11:13 PM)
I'm glad you took that chance, and assigned soemone with a decent background on the topic with writing (the author who wrote this was wiccan herself, or am I mistaken there?). Also, The gaming audience tends to be religiously less intolerant than the mainstream, or at least, that's my impression.

I'm very glad Rob as Line Developer has taken the approach he has to a number of things in the SR setting. I firmly believe a lot of the material in the recent and upcoming books would have had a hard time coming out otherwise. I mean, honestly, which game company would be ballsy enough to take put out a book about something so blatantly controversial as extrapolating contermporary politics and ideologies on this level?

And actually I did the Wicca and Druidic material (with Pistons keeping a watchful eye). I have a personal interest in comparative theology and religions and SR's unique paradigm makes them a very interesting subject to explore in fiction. Get ready for my take on Hinduism in Shadows of Asia wink.gif.

QUOTE
I'm more surprised you got away with the sex chapter in SOTA '63. That was something I had actually not expected to be in any book published (at least in part) for the North American market, simply because of fear of the backlash. Guess I was mistaken there.

True. I had forgotten that bit.
hermit
QUOTE
Get ready for my take on Hinduism in Shadows of Asia.

Certainly am! biggrin.gif

QUOTE
True. I had forgotten that bit.

I still remmeber my amazement to read this in an American book (even more than the fact that prostitution - other nono topic by US standards - was covered in Underworld (and other books, including MrJLBB). Adds a lot to the gritty feel. All we now need is a good amount of street drugs. But that'd really be expecting too much, I'm afraid, as I doupt that would pass even before a European audience (not all Europe is the Netherlands, after all).

Anyway. Great job that you guys did on these books so far. Especialy as they're tied in with the real world. Makes reading the sourcebooks a lot more fun than pure fantasy. smile.gif

At least for me. biggrin.gif
Thanos007
QUOTE
To say what the book says treats them as mentally ill for being interested in something "evil," which strikes me as evil itself in its condemnation.


Is it possible that the remark was facetious? Some how I find it hard to belive they seriously thought they were mentally ill. For instance I would say of someone who liked ROTS that they need their head examined. Sure it's derisive but I don't think they're really mentally ill.

BTW. I get 'cha with your edited post.

Thanos
mfb
my precious, precious eyes. the next poster to use red text in this forum gets stabbed. assuming i'm able to see, at that point.
Penta
QUOTE (Thanos007)
Is it possible that the remark was facetious? Some how I find it hard to belive they seriously thought they were mentally ill. For instance I would say of someone who liked ROTS that they need their head examined. Sure it's derisive but I don't think they're really mentally ill.

You realize that sarcasm does not travel at all in print, right?
Penta
QUOTE (hermit)
I still remmeber my amazement to read this in an American book (even more than the fact that prostitution - other nono topic by US standards - was covered in Underworld (and other books, including MrJLBB). Adds a lot to the gritty feel. All we now need is a good amount of street drugs. But that'd really be expecting too much, I'm afraid, as I doupt that would pass even before a European audience (not all Europe is the Netherlands, after all).

Hermit: Prostitution and drugs: Maybe not.

Remember the blockbuster hit that was Traffic, after all.

It's when one implies approval that you run into a minefield with a "blow me up" sign on.
Raskolnikov
Read the Eco groups after work today.

It easily could have been the lamest of the sections, but was not.

I will also have to log it as a mark against the euro-centric politics claim, so check this section out Crim. It includes the Sierra Club, a wide-base group that is funded primarily by people who likely do not recycle and pour their paint down the drains. Additionally there are not only the expected back-to-nature escapists but there are references made to the over-engineered high technophile brand of renewable dreamers, a mindset that today causes shuffling of feet and rolling of eyes when greens meet on a global level.

I have not read the GI section and will likely read it last, so I reference the in-character material here: I liked the adventure hooks mentioned throughout this section. The bulk of the shadowtalk presented suitably realistic and interesting information without resorting to "dystopian for effect" or "green equals happytime."

I would also like to commend the author for introducing only one high-power nonhuman. There are references to paranormal support for many of these causes, but (thank god) only one figure described as more than a throw-away reference is such. I had feared I would see all kind of great dragons and spirits, which would have saddened me as I play Shadowrun for the human trauma and drama, not so I can hear stories about super-cool dragons.

In summary, I enjoyed that the breadth of the green agitators were described, from the useful face orgs the characters will likely encounter from day to day to the radical warriors they might just run up against or in support of on a tactical level in a situation that will quickly escalate out of their comfort zone. I find the character of the orgs presented to be agreeable. One might say it's too western but eco-war is a luxury of the rich nations. The groups, I do not doubt, will collaborate with local anti-corpors or rebel groups when it comes to the poor countries, but the luxury to fixate simply on eco-policy instead of freedom or food I have no trouble attributing to mainly western groups.
Critias
My only real beef with any of the religous sections was that reading over all of them in one book just reminded me of the vaguely anti-Christian feel SR gives off sometimes. It seems like most of the outspokenly pagan groups do good things (or at least mean well), and like every third or fourth evil conspiracy group is tied to Christianity. frown.gif From the right-winger CAS/UCAS anti-meta hate groups to the Catholic Church itself, it really kind of feels like SR's got an angry vibe goin' on against the big JC in the sky, yo.

Not that I particularly care, on a personal level (in the same way I don't care whether people like Facists or not) -- but it again bugs me (though this time clearly only based on "in characters" presentations) that the developer's personal feelings might be coloring the game world a little more than they could/should.
Penta
Critias, you make my tongue feel incompetent.

Why does everybody else express my points better than I do?
Synner
You do realize the Vigilia are a bunch of (relatively) do-gooders and the rest of the groups are actually Islamic (both of which are portrayed as having slightly darker tones)?
Skarn Ka
QUOTE (Critias)
it again bugs me (though this time clearly only based on "in characters" presentations) that the developer's personal feelings might be coloring the game world a little more than they could/should.

Okay now you feel *in-character* material hurts sensibilities. But tell me how you want to avoid that. As soon as you're critical of someone's reference group, you're gonna hurt him.

Your IC stuff is anti-Christian ? Tone it down, you gonna hurt the Christians. Covering in detail terrorism issues in Islam sections ? Fuck it, why always refer to us Muslims in a terrorism context ? Trash that ! Talkin' about how some Greens can be really too radical ? Man, you gonna hurt the tree-huggers out there, so think twice.

I see your point, mind you. But youb can't ask that from writers, or they'd have to treat *every group* with the same respect and basically shut up their mouth and at best write an encyclopedia article, not a game book.

mfb
it's not a problem if the IC stuff is anti-whatever. it's a problem when the IC stuff is consistently anti-whatever.
Skarn Ka
QUOTE (hermit @ May 24 2005, 11:13 PM)

As for fascism ... >snip< Take the PLO.

Sorry if I''m a picky here, but this is something I happen to care about.

It is your right to call whatever threat you want fascist, but don't make such shortcuts. The PLO is far more complex than that. It's not a single entity, it's 13 movements vaguely glued together with lots of splinter groups and vary different agendas and ideologies, from Islamist to Marxist and more.

EDIT : Man, I feel the Middle-East in SoA will trigger some awesome reactions...
Skarn Ka
QUOTE (mfb)
it's not a problem if the IC stuff is anti-whatever. it's a problem when the IC stuff is consistently anti-whatever.

So you have a problem with the stuff r being *consistently* anti-corp too ?
I fully agree with you, but read the Christian stuff in SoE and LA, then tell me if it's consistently anti-Christian. Read any of the more recent books (that have politics and society analysis inside as some seem to regret), and tell me anti-what SR is now.
Crimsondude 2.0
I never understood the idea of Antifa. It seems kind of hypocritical to me.
Synner
It isn't truely hypocritical, it is "reactionary". To a certain extent Antifas aren't a true political movement because they generally lack an ideology of their own and congregate simply as a reaction to fascism. Generally speaking Antifa activists (unlike other types of activism) are people who have suffered directly from fascism in one or another of its forms. Unfortunately many of them believe in fighting fire with fire and an eye for an eye.

That being said there are several RL organizations similar to International Spotlight who do very good work in putting fascist movements and regimes on the spot and in the media.
hermit
Skarn: Right, upon reading up more on them, they were propably a bit out of place in that list. Didn't know that groups like the PDLF are considered part of the PLO. I was referring to Fatah here.

Also, one thing I genuinely like about SR is that, while it's books adress a wealth of real-world issues, they steer clear of taking sides. They present christian mages and wiccans as, in essence morally equal. Sure, there's a wealth of churhc conspiracy theories. With an institution like the catholic church, there's bound to be such things. However, the pagans don't get off easy either (Britain's blood mage druids, fanatic eco terrorist witches ...). Neither do native Americans ('Behind the masks', Threats 2, and of course, the Azzies). However, with the exception of Aztlaner faith, no religion is painted as being only bad either.

If you cmplain about SR being "vaguely anti-christian", it's maybe that you miss the usually pro-christian tone in modern US fiction. That, however, doesn't make SR anti-christian.

And for the record, I see no problem in stepping on a few toes now and then, so long as these toes are demographically equally spread.
Skarn Ka
QUOTE

I see no problem in stepping on a few toes now and then, so long as these toes are demographically equally spread.


Hey, that'd be a cool sig. grinbig.gif
Critias
QUOTE (hermit)
If you cmplain about SR being "vaguely anti-christian", it's maybe that you miss the usually pro-christian tone in modern US fiction. That, however, doesn't make SR anti-christian.

And for the record, I see no problem in stepping on a few toes now and then, so long as these toes are demographically equally spread.

When I get home to my books, if I muster up the give a damn to do so, I'll tally up all the pro-and-anti stuff I can spot off the top of my head (Christianty vs. the various flavors of paganism), and see if I'm just reading into it too much based on stuff I know about some of the writers IRL, or if it's a legit vibe I sometimes pick up. The odds of me actually doing this are slim, but I'm curious enough about the final headcount to think real hard about doing something this much like homework.

It's not like it bugs me all that much, like I said. It's the principle (writer's personal beleifs becoming "right" in their created reality, proving them "right" all along) more than the specifics that concerns me. And it's just that, a concern, rather than a specific complaint (at this point). I mean, there's no brand new nation-state called Kensontopia that showed up in any recent book, that took over the world because they're so cool, and every single citizen-soldier of Kensontopia is a gay earth-mother worshipping mage that rides his ally spirit/motorcycle, or something I can pinpoint. It's just something I'm worried about happening, more than something I'm saying is already there.
Hasagwan
If I remember correctly, the haven't railed against Christians, but made the organized Christianity, namely the Catholic Church, and the televangelistis darker than they are in our world. Don't forget that the Sylvesters are good people and they've praised them since the Secrets of Power Trilogy.
Synner
As Crimson has brought it up, I would like to add a reference which didn't make it into the book (mea culpa) and credit is due where credit is due.

The descriptor list on fascism paraphrases and expands upon a list put together by Mr. Chip Berlet in the introduction to Russ Bellant's "Old Nazis, the New Right, and the Republican Party" (an abridged version can be found online at Publiceye.org - a relatively impartial source despite the liberal bias). I picked this one since Mr. Berlet's list is at least partially derivative and synthesizes similar descriptors detailed in the works of Umberto Ecco, Heinz Lubasz, Walter Laqueur, George Mosse, Richard Wolin and Robert Paxton (the latter two are particularly interesting for a historical perspective of both the ideological evolution of Fascism and its practical manifestations).
hermit
Okay, here's a list of evil groups, divided into Christian, Wiccan/Pagan and Native. Note: I don't have all books, and haven't read all of them again. I must have missed stuff. But so far, the score is pretty even.

1. Christian:
- New Revolution (threats 2)
- Order of the Temple (threats 2)
- True Church of God and his saints (Germany SB)**

2. Pagan/Wiccan:
- Winternight, which essentially is a coven of Norse-inspired Shamans. (threats 2)
- Blood Magic using Druids (London)
- Black Lodge (threats 2)

3. Native
- False Face Society (threats 2)
- Path of the Sun (Aztlan)*

*Aztlan SB clearly makes Catholics out to be the good underdog kind of guys.
**Germany SB was very much biased to the far left and against Christianity. It also was the biggest single pile of crap ever published by FASA.

All in all: Christianity leads Native and Pagan/Wiccan in threats only by 1, and that's due to a book that's hardly canon anyway.
Critias
Don't several of the various anti-meta policlub-style groups also have some establish Christian connection (or at least veneer of Christianity)? IIRC -- and I may not -- they've largely been presented as (naturally) just the Shadowrun version of the KKK and similar, passing off metas and magicians as perversions against God's nature, yadda yadda. While not officially affiliated with organized religion (unless by behind-the-scenes funding), even that sort of thing would still be a "Christians = Evil" sort of vibe, y'know?

I dunno. Like I said, it's quite possible I'm just having a few bits and pieces stick in my gullet about it from coloring stuff myself, kind of "looking for examples" in my memory. *shrugs* Either way, I stated my concern (IE, that game developers view their personal beleifs as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and SR's future as their chance to show they were "right" all along) and hope it's not something we've got to look forward to.
Demonseed Elite
QUOTE
Don't several of the various anti-meta policlub-style groups also have some establish Christian connection (or at least veneer of Christianity)?


The Zealot's faction of Alamos 20K in Threats is linked to the Ministry of Mankind and the Church of the God-Man, centered in Asia. Both are recognized religious organizations, but there's no real text saying they are Christian. They sound like some sort of transcendental humanist New Age group to me.

And writers do flavor the canon, absolutely. That's the nature of fiction writing. It's up to Rob to guide what we write into a path that matches his view of the game's direction, though, so the writers aren't doing anything that is "out of line" (assuming good line designer control). Now, it's very possible Rob's view of the game doesn't match yours, yes. But it's usually not a line designer's intent to maintain some sort of politically neutral stance.

Take games like Fading Suns or Tribe 8. Both are heavily influenced by Christianity. Their worlds are steeped in it. That's their game direction. Meanwhile, take a game like Exalted, which is heavily influenced by Asian religions. That's their choice of development, there's no intent to remain neutral.
Raskolnikov
Besides, with a built up tradition as complex, convoluted, and frankly...interesting as christianity (primarily catholacism) it is just too hard to ignore the game opertunities of the various secrect societies, agendas, angle worship, etc, etc.
Penta
Yeah, but you're wandering over bits of people's identities. Some sensitivity would seem to be at least called for, if not actually applied always.
hermit
QUOTE
Don't several of the various anti-meta policlub-style groups also have some establish Christian connection (or at least veneer of Christianity)? IIRC -- and I may not -- they've largely been presented as (naturally) just the Shadowrun version of the KKK and similar, passing off metas and magicians as perversions against God's nature, yadda yadda. While not officially affiliated with organized religion (unless by behind-the-scenes funding), even that sort of thing would still be a "Christians = Evil" sort of vibe, y'know?

Nope, it's not anti-christianity per se. Yes, those groups have been portrayed as the 2050s answer to the KKK in early fiction. That's, though, more because SR back then was thoroughly American, as is the KKK, which just hapens to be the most high-profile racist organisation (and the most notorious) in the states. A clear reference to US interior politics.

However, even under these circumstances, would you say all Christians are responsible for the KKK's existence? I wouldn't. That'd be quite unfair - though Christianity in America didn't always help, it also didn't incite people on a wide scale against Blacks.

Also, while catholics initially were fiercely anti-Meta, they changed their stance quickly.

Christians don't get off any better than other faiths, ideologies or ethnicities. But they aren't singled out and bashed, either.

QUOTE
Yeah, but you're wandering over bits of people's identities. Some sensitivity would seem to be at least called for, if not actually applied always.

And get a soft-soft offend-noone product that isn't in any way gritty or dark, like AD&D? No thanks. Like I said above, so long as it's not the same toes that are being stepped on, a few stepped on toes aren't gonna kill anyone. Don't start blatantly taking sides on any of the controversial issues, though.

And where have sensitivities been hurt? By saying that not ALL christians are motrher Theresa? By saying that eco-terrorists actually are terrorists too? By merely mentioning the fact that there's SEX in the SR world?
Demonseed Elite
QUOTE
Yeah, but you're wandering over bits of people's identities. Some sensitivity would seem to be at least called for, if not actually applied always.


I would say there definitely is. But that doesn't mean you can't use an aspect of a religious or political belief system as an antagonist in a game. Part of the fundamental theme of Shadowrun (and cyberpunk) is in the corruption of organizations and their dehumanizing disconnection from the individual, whether the organization is a corporation, church, or government. It's not to say that the entire belief is bad, but that when applied in an organizational structure, some elements most likely will be (without this, you'd hardly have the dystopian atmosphere of Shadowrun).
Penta
QUOTE (Demonseed Elite)
QUOTE
Yeah, but you're wandering over bits of people's identities. Some sensitivity would seem to be at least called for, if not actually applied always.


I would say there definitely is. But that doesn't mean you can't use an aspect of a religious or political belief system as an antagonist in a game. Part of the fundamental theme of Shadowrun (and cyberpunk) is in the corruption of organizations and their dehumanizing disconnection from the individual, whether the organization is a corporation, church, or government. It's not to say that the entire belief is bad, but that when applied in an organizational structure, some elements most likely will be (without this, you'd hardly have the dystopian atmosphere of Shadowrun).

I agree with this.

Hermit: You completely twist my words. I'm not saying criticism is not warranted. But an unending stream of criticism with no letup or compensation is...insulting.
hermit
QUOTE
Hermit: You completely twist my words. I'm not saying criticism is not warranted. But an unending stream of criticism with no letup or compensation is...insulting.

Sorry. Wasn't my intention. But I don't see how Shadowrun's books were insulting to anyone, either.
Crimsondude 2.0
QUOTE (Synner)
It isn't truely hypocritical, it is "reactionary". To a certain extent Antifas aren't a true political movement because they generally lack an ideology of their own and congregate simply as a reaction to fascism. Generally speaking Antifa activists (unlike other types of activism) are people who have suffered directly from fascism in one or another of its forms. Unfortunately many of them believe in fighting fire with fire and an eye for an eye.

That being said there are several RL organizations similar to International Spotlight who do very good work in putting fascist movements and regimes on the spot and in the media.

Well, I'm primarily thinking of the violent antifas. At a certain point it does seem a bit hypocritical in that some of these people are saying, or in effecting saying, "Think this way (or don't this this way) or we'll kick your ass."

The militant revolutionary antifas are another subject. This is mainly within the sphere of antifas in existing liberal deomcracies or something like them.
Raskolnikov
In my youth I used to know some antifas-type fellows. It is hypocritical, but when you are a young tough who wishes to rage against injustice and intolerance, what better way to do so than by beating up those that embody it? Most people grow out of the phase where they wander the bad parts of town looking for skinheads to beat up.
Penta
I'd hope, Ras.

The first broken nose is funny. The sixth is sad.
Crimsondude 2.0
Oh, yeah. About that review I mentioned might be written.

It's never going to see the light of day.

I haven't even looked at this book for a week, nor do I have any plans to do so.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012