Full Version: Clarification on Spell Increased Reflexes
You two going to meet on the playground after school? Geez...
I see my efforts to set a respectable example have gone unheeded.
actually I have a way of getting rid of the problem.
Get rid of the problem.
Remove Increased reflexes as a spell.
simple
no need to argue now
Get rid of the problem.
Remove Increased reflexes as a spell.
simple
no need to argue now
| QUOTE (blakkie @ Oct 11 2006, 11:19 PM) |
| Every once in a while i run into someone so grossly lacking in cognitive skills that it becomes painfully obvious my life is much better by actively avoiding any interaction with them. Congratulations, you just made the list. |
Ummm... Ok. So when someone gives a detailed account of what occured you insult them and don't even bother trying to appear rational. I guess "what do you mean" is too difficult a concept for you to comprehend.
Thanks for deciding to ignore me. Hopefully it'll save me some consternation in the future.
| QUOTE (Emod) |
| You two going to meet on the playground after school? Geez... |
If you're talking about me I wasn't trying to argue. I was trying to figure out what exactly drove a bee up blakkie's butt about my posts that caused him to want to argue. Apparently not even he knew that well enough to explain.
| QUOTE (Emod) |
| You two going to meet on the playground after school? Geez... |
Oh no, oh no. He's NOT arguing.
He also didn't notice, among other things I guess, that Fortune had even mentioned the exact same point ealier in the thread. Maybe he didn't notice it because Fortune had given it in factual form?Anyway, thanks for the motivation poster for following my course of action. Even if it mommentarily distracted me.
So you're still claiming that Increased Reflexes hoses being healed? That's what you're saying when you say the following statement is not factual: "Increased Reflexes doesn't hose your ability to be healed by magic." As a binary statement either it is true or it's converse is true. I seriously doubt that you really mean to say that IR hoses magical healing, which leaves me with the conclusion that perhaps you don't understand what's been said?
Who cares what Fortune said (no offense to Fortune)? He used different words, but the result was the same. We were both saying that IR does not interfere with magical healing. In any case I was not making a statement based on his post I was replying to a very specific post with a very specific counterpoint. Somehow that point managed to twist your panties around and sent you on a meandering path that ended with saying increased reflexes interferes with magical healing.
It's definitely been an interesting ride, so I suppose I can at least thank you for that.
Who cares what Fortune said (no offense to Fortune)? He used different words, but the result was the same. We were both saying that IR does not interfere with magical healing. In any case I was not making a statement based on his post I was replying to a very specific post with a very specific counterpoint. Somehow that point managed to twist your panties around and sent you on a meandering path that ended with saying increased reflexes interferes with magical healing.
It's definitely been an interesting ride, so I suppose I can at least thank you for that.
| QUOTE (James McMurray) |
| Who cares what Fortune said (no offense to Fortune)? |
I kinda do, but none taken.
That was meant on very specific terms regarding this topic and how our posts relate, not a blanket statement.
I know. I just couldn't resist responding. 
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.