Glayvin34
Jun 21 2007, 04:49 PM
Anyone else read the little intro blurb on the last page of the Emergence preview? There's a team busting into some insane asylum and some Technomancer kid hacks all of their PANs and overloads their earbuds, effectively disabling the entire team.
How did he do that?
The Hacker mentions wi fi emissions in the asylum, even though all the security is hard wired, so maybe we can assume that the kid managed a matrix perception roll v. the Hacker, so that means he can start spoofing. Through spoofing he can get the other comms to give up their commcodes. Then he would thread the bejesus out of his Stealth and start Hacking on the fly, eventually reaching everyone's earbuds that must be attached to their PANs.
Does that sound right to anyone else? Can earbuds get that loud or there some artistic license being taken?
hobgoblin
Jun 21 2007, 04:53 PM
i smell artistic license. either that or they are going to throw in some AR attack rules somewhere in the book

but hey, in theory earbuds can get as high as they can physically take it. and that will probably be far above what the human ear can take.
oh the joys of freelancer crack....
The kid didn't just override their commlinks, could be it hacked their cybereyes, too, along with its two sprites 'Nausea' and 'Vertigo'.
Dashifen
Jun 21 2007, 05:04 PM
I think it probably was artistic liscence, but I had a hacker in my game break into a kid's wireless mp3 device one time to turn up the volume and get his attention. Not outside the realm of believability to think that a TM could somehow transmit to people at high volumes (especially if they have a sound link of some kind) after gaining access to the group's PAN.
Rotbart van Dainig
Jun 21 2007, 05:08 PM
QUOTE (Glayvin34) |
How did he do that? |
I'm not trying to think too hard about that, because Spam Zones, that have actual rules, make even less sense.
knasser
Jun 21 2007, 05:09 PM
The implication in the initial story is that the kid is actually generating his own wireless signal, in that everything is said to be hard-wired presumably as an attempt to stop him hacking everything.
It's probably artistic licence, but it's a very punchy introduction piece, so I don't care.
fistandantilus4.0
Jun 21 2007, 05:12 PM
I dunno, I'd find it suprising if they allowed a lot of atristic licence on the piece of fiction that opened the new book. My vote goes to 'sign of things to come'.
Hey, Ronin hacked someone's brain once, in Technobabel.
QUOTE (knasser) |
... it's a very punchy introduction piece, .... |
Thank you
This sets a new record for 'fastest compliment ever for content of a Shadowrun book not yet released'
hobgoblin
Jun 21 2007, 05:17 PM
he also complains that they bring voices. im guessing that the wired security isolates him from the matrix in general.
mfb
Jun 21 2007, 05:34 PM
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jun 21 2007, 12:08 PM) |
I'm not trying to think too hard about that, because Spam Zones, that have actual rules, make even less sense. |
eh? why? i mean, if you walk into a mall, you've got physical proximity to sellers. i don't see why they wouldn't spam you with "hey, look at this!"
Critias
Jun 21 2007, 05:37 PM
It must be awesome walking around in 2070+, having all those holographic ads waving giant penises at you and promising they can be yours.
"KNOCK DOWN WALLS WITH A TROLL SIZED DICK!" as the first thirty five out of forty messages waiting for you when you put on your smartglasses every morning.
Adarael
Jun 21 2007, 05:42 PM
You think strong firewalls are a good idea now, wait until when you can boot your commlink and suddenly be assaulted not only by images of said troll-sized members, but also taste them and feel them violating you as a sales pitch.
Firewalls are required to save your damn sanity.
WearzManySkins
Jun 21 2007, 05:48 PM
QUOTE (mfb) |
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jun 21 2007, 12:08 PM) | I'm not trying to think too hard about that, because Spam Zones, that have actual rules, make even less sense. |
eh? why? i mean, if you walk into a mall, you've got physical proximity to sellers. i don't see why they wouldn't spam you with "hey, look at this!"
|
Who says they have to allow you to get in close proximity. In RL today spammers do not have a code of conduct, or oversight committee. Also today what few government attempts to regulate spam, have been feeble and ineffective. I so not see anything changing in the year 2070.
I see spam zones loaded with signal sources of maximum strength, one has to get their spam out in front so to speak.
I can also see, as you enter or just before you enter such a zone, you get an offer of spam protection via wireless. You pay a fee and the spam is of a "reasonable" level, you do not pay, you seem to be targeted by everything and everyone. Using your AR if you do not pay, is very confusing at least.
Rotbart van Dainig
Jun 21 2007, 05:56 PM
QUOTE (mfb) |
QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig) | I'm not trying to think too hard about that, because Spam Zones, that have actual rules, make even less sense. |
eh? why? i mean, if you walk into a mall, you've got physical proximity to sellers. i don't see why they wouldn't spam you with "hey, look at this!"
|
Because 'proximity' has an accuracy of about 50m diameter - and any Mode other than Active discards anything incoming as a default... the rules also disregard the difference in Firewall quality.
Jack Kain
Jun 21 2007, 05:57 PM
One sprite for each runner, nuff said.
MYST1C
Jun 21 2007, 06:12 PM
QUOTE (knasser) |
The implication in the initial story is that the kid is actually generating his own wireless signal |
Well, a technomancer has to - how else should he connect to the WiFi matrix?
deek
Jun 21 2007, 06:35 PM
QUOTE (WearzManySkins) |
QUOTE (mfb @ Jun 21 2007, 12:34 PM) | QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig @ Jun 21 2007, 12:08 PM) | I'm not trying to think too hard about that, because Spam Zones, that have actual rules, make even less sense. |
eh? why? i mean, if you walk into a mall, you've got physical proximity to sellers. i don't see why they wouldn't spam you with "hey, look at this!"
|
Who says they have to allow you to get in close proximity. In RL today spammers do not have a code of conduct, or oversight committee. Also today what few government attempts to regulate spam, have been feeble and ineffective. I so not see anything changing in the year 2070.
I see spam zones loaded with signal sources of maximum strength, one has to get their spam out in front so to speak.
I can also see, as you enter or just before you enter such a zone, you get an offer of spam protection via wireless. You pay a fee and the spam is of a "reasonable" level, you do not pay, you seem to be targeted by everything and everyone. Using your AR if you do not pay, is very confusing at least.
|
One has to remember, 2070 isn't controlled by "governments" per se, its corporations, and only a few of them. To think that the matrix is not strictly controlled by a handful of these corps is hard for me to believe.
I don't see how Corp B can even attempt to spam a person walking in the mall sponsored by Corp A...
I just think there is quite a paradigm shift once we start understanding what control the corps have in 2070...
knasser
Jun 21 2007, 06:49 PM
QUOTE (deek @ Jun 21 2007, 06:35 PM) |
One has to remember, 2070 isn't controlled by "governments" per se, its corporations, and only a few of them. To think that the matrix is not strictly controlled by a handful of these corps is hard for me to believe.
I don't see how Corp B can even attempt to spam a person walking in the mall sponsored by Corp A...
I just think there is quite a paradigm shift once we start understanding what control the corps have in 2070... |
There are tens of thousands of corps in 2070. The AAA "megacorps" control things in the sense that they're the biggest and the baddest and they influence economies of whole nations. But they don't control things in the sense of micromanaging every little life or deciding who is on a spam list or who isn't.
And hacking is hacking because you're doing things that the owner of the system doesn't want you to do. It's not only a case of allowing people to do things. It's a case of being able to stop them if you don't.
QUOTE (TW) |
QUOTE (knasser) | ... it's a very punchy introduction piece, .... |
Thank you This sets a new record for 'fastest compliment ever for content of a Shadowrun book not yet released'  |
Well enjoy it as it's coming from someone who doesn't like the idea of technomancers and thinks building a metaplot around a single character archetype is a bad idea in concept. But that's not going to stop me recognizing good work in a fellow writer.
If Corp A runs a mall and is very stricht about selecting tennants, then Corp B would not be even in the mall. So yeah, in Aztechnology's Flagship mall in downtown Tenochtitlan, you probably would find Azzie brands only. But that doesn't mean that ARO's, Spam, MegaSale AR-blips etc. would be regulated in any way. mall owners today hardly dictate a Retail store's layout and design other than in ensuring it doesn't violate any safety or totally destroy the mall's aesthetic appeal. After all, the corp wants to make money, and to do soit needs to attract customers. How do you do that? Either specialize in certain market fields or offer a variety of brands and commodities.
This is even more true for public (non-corp owned malls). How these guys advertize might be regulated (the same way today's store front signs and logo sizes might be limited, maybe the ARO's could be regulated, too) but not whether or not at all. All tennants would need to be allowed to advertize their product.
kigmatzomat
Jun 21 2007, 07:28 PM
QUOTE (TW) |
The kid didn't just override their commlinks, could be it hacked their cybereyes, too, along with its two sprites 'Nausea' and 'Vertigo'. |
The team, being morons who obviously don't have sound-damper earbuds that woudn't get painfully loud, had their comms subscribed to the hacker.
The kid breaks into the hacker's comm and uses Edit to send an audio/video stream to each team member. The stream consists of a max-amplitude screech that warbles (audio) and some quasi-random swirly pattern (video). Their comms add the stream to the earbuds/imagelink just the way they would for the hacker.
This is a lesson to you: never subscribe gear to a comm subscribed to anything else.
deek
Jun 21 2007, 07:31 PM
QUOTE (TW) |
If Corp A runs a mall and is very stricht about selecting tennants, then Corp B would not be even in the mall. So yeah, in Aztechnology's Flagship mall in downtown Tenochtitlan, you probably would find Azzie brands only. But that doesn't mean that ARO's, Spam, MegaSale AR-blips etc. would be regulated in any way. mall owners today hardly dictate a Retail store's layout and design other than in ensuring it doesn't violate any safety or totally destroy the mall's aesthetic appeal. After all, the corp wants to make money, and to do soit needs to attract customers. How do you do that? Either specialize in certain market fields or offer a variety of brands and commodities.
This is even more true for public (non-corp owned malls). How these guys advertize might be regulated (the same way today's store front signs and logo sizes might be limited, maybe the ARO's could be regulated, too) but not whether or not at all. All tennants would need to be allowed to advertize their product. |
Well, given that a corp is there to make money, I'd think they would be well aware if tons of spam were pushing away consumers...and that is all I am saying. In 2070, these corps have a ton more control than anything we can currently think of (IMO), and to think they are not smart enough to regulate spam going to their own consumers...
I guess it all depends on how you want to run your campaign, but I see it as a lot more structured...not to a micro-managed state, but even little hacks, I think they are aware of...they just may choose to do nothing about it.
Good point, but maybe Corp A actually has a stake in the advertizing company that programmed the ARO's or has connections to the data mining outfit that evaluates the losers that actually click on the 'Troll sized Penis scam'...sure they have a lot more control, but that doesn't mean it's managed better. I'd see these ARO's as the 2070 version of that pesky guy trying to hand you a handful of flyers for the store three levels down in the back of the mall near the washrooms...and mall security is doing nothing against the flyer today
Wakshaani
Jun 21 2007, 11:03 PM
QUOTE (knasser) |
QUOTE | Well enjoy it as it's coming from someone who doesn't like the idea of technomancers and thinks building a metaplot around a single character archetype is a bad idea in concept. But that's not going to stop me recognizing good work in a fellow writer. 
|
|
*coughcoughimmortalelvenmagicianscough*
knasser
Jun 21 2007, 11:18 PM
QUOTE (Wakshaani) |
QUOTE (knasser @ Jun 21 2007, 06:49 PM) | QUOTE | Well enjoy it as it's coming from someone who doesn't like the idea of technomancers and thinks building a metaplot around a single character archetype is a bad idea in concept. But that's not going to stop me recognizing good work in a fellow writer. 
|
|
*coughcoughimmortalelvenmagicianscough*
|
Missing the point. No-one was unfairly given centre stage because "immortal elf" was their character type. At least I hope that's the case.

But I'm now qualifying my reservations to say that although it looks like something I don't want, it looks like it may be a very good thing that I don't want. I hope I'm being fair.
WearzManySkins
Jun 21 2007, 11:26 PM
Shopping malls? LOL
Example that that wonderful place in Hong Kong, the mile+ long escalator, just think of the AR spam.
Corps have little they can do about spam on the streets so to speak.
With the ease of hacking etc that the New rules allow, any script kiddies with is PDA can hack anything the Corps put up to stop spam.
Then for those corp enclaves of spam free enterprise, I give you the script kiddy armed with a spam drone, to bring spam into their hollowed spaces.
Spam Zones along streets have a better chance of being "controlled" by various organizations such mafia/yaks etc. And such control is mainly where is my nuyen. They could careless if any person walking along said street was inconvenienced by AR spam.
My example of a spam protection racket is a possibility and a fact. It falls right in with the agendas of underworld types/organizations.
Rotbart van Dainig
Jun 22 2007, 09:59 AM
If you spam on corporate ground without permission, the corp will most likely have some thugs track you down and kick your teeth in.
Meriss
Jun 23 2007, 02:47 AM
My main question is twofold.
A. Did they have Datajacks, cause if they did the kid can just get all up in their business. "I'm in UR head. Hackin UR brain"
B. Is it just me or are the blurb example teams way stupider than your average decent PC runner team? Some how if these were PCs and they heard Apes, they'd be "Seeya Mr. J"
Side question, is it just me or do all the really nasty threats in SR have funky acronyms?
Jack Kain
Jun 23 2007, 03:16 AM
QUOTE (Meriss) |
My main question is twofold.
A. Did they have Datajacks, cause if they did the kid can just get all up in their business. "I'm in UR head. Hackin UR brain" |
Data Jacks are wired ports. They have no wireless access to a technomancer can't access them unless they are plugged a wireless device or a device the technomancer is also wired to.
Its only purpose is to allow you to connected to hardwired device with out wireless capability.
Ravor
Jun 23 2007, 05:34 AM
In the past? Sure.
Now that everything is supposed to be wireless by default including your cyberarm, I'd have to disagree.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 23 2007, 06:59 AM
Which is an interpretation that makes zero sense, since a lot of the Essense loss involved in cyberwear is from the invasive proceedures done to link all your cyber to your own neurology. And making stuff wireless just to give hackers ways to screw with people in a firefight is not only lame, it's all the more reason that everybody who makes cyberware would stop making wireless cyber after the first production run, when they come back with massive complaints about rogue hackers literally forcing people to shoot teammates.
hobgoblin
Jun 23 2007, 07:10 AM
the wireless part of the cyberlimb may well be diagnostics and similar.
as in, its for doctors/techies so that they dont have to break out a cable.
and wheres does it say that you cant turn the wireless off?
Ravor
Jun 23 2007, 07:12 AM
I quite agree that RAW has a stupid take on this issue, which is why in my campaigns I assume that although Wireless is built into everything just in case it is assumed to be turned off and your cyber can talk to each other and your brain via DNI.
Still even so, a it seems to me that a Datajack would be an exception to this, because its only fragging purpose is to connect with the Matrix, so Wireless Access actually serves a purpose instead of merely being a neon "Hack Me" sign for every passing Decker.
hobgoblin
Jun 23 2007, 07:16 AM
btw, i have a distinct feel that while earlier versions had a clear writing from the view of a runner, SR4 seems to have a more joe on the street feel.
and for the latter, it may well not be a problem to have wireless on all the time.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 23 2007, 07:23 AM
I'd tend to agree about Wireless...
Without the ability to shut off your cyber's wireless anytime you don't need it - such as at the cyberdoc's for maintienance - it's just making your body into an array of big glowing NEON ARO's saying "How would you like to turn this Cybersammie against himself on this initiative pass"? A schmorgasboard of click-and-frag options.
Of course, Joe Slighty-Cybered Average is probably clueless and leaves his wireless on all the time, which could be humorous and tactical.
Ravor
Jun 23 2007, 07:58 AM
I don't know ShadowDragon8685, it seems to me that you'd be right and the first generation of Wireless-Enabled Cyber was On by default, but that option would quickly be patched or recalled as millions of Joe Slighty-Cybered Averages was hacked by passing Deckers and Script-Kiddies.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 23 2007, 08:03 AM
How many of Joe Slighty-Cybered Average bothers to pay attention to patches and recalls?
Hell, patches are something they won't even bother with, meaning they won't get them unless their machines do it automatically. To comply with a recall, first they'd have to hear about it (big if), then... Here's the unimaginable part... They'd actually have to go to the trouble of visiting the cyberdoc, having the cyber taken back out, and sent back to the company.
It's more work than most bother to obey a recall of car safety seats. How many are going to comply with a recall if it involves major invasive surgery coming out of their pockets?
Critias
Jun 23 2007, 08:23 AM
If the entire problem is "my wireless network is open all the time so anyone that wants to can contact it" wouldn't it actually be really easy for them to hear about the recall, really?
Synner
Jun 23 2007, 09:03 AM
QUOTE (Ravor @ Jun 23 2007, 07:12 AM) |
I quite agree that RAW has a stupid take on this issue, which is why in my campaigns I assume that although Wireless is built into everything just in case it is assumed to be turned off and your cyber can talk to each other and your brain via DNI. |
I've repeated this several times now. Neural interfaces remain the primary control method for cybernetics of all kinds; cyber is still hardwired to your neural network and recieves commands from the brain directly - ie. cyberware works just fine if you have all your wi-fi turned off.
Wi-fi functionality provides complementary functions such as diagnostics, remote access, data storage, additional processing power, interfacing with implanted devices/software, etc (see the relevant examples of wi-fi usage as regards cyber in the BBB).
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 23 2007, 09:15 AM
QUOTE (Critias) |
If the entire problem is "my wireless network is open all the time so anyone that wants to can contact it" wouldn't it actually be really easy for them to hear about the recall, really? |
His spam filters would probably filter it out, and even if they didn't, he'd still have to realize it (a) applies to him, and (b) matters enough for him to dig the money to have major cybersurgery done to himself (again).
Critias
Jun 23 2007, 09:44 AM
I don't know about you, but if I made cyberarms (and a billion other things that I liked to advertise), I'd set it up so the spam filters that got built into my cyberarms didn't apply to my products. You could even then, in fact, pass it off as a method solely for the company to keep you updated with changes in products and emergency recalls (when in actuality it's free reign for all your sub-companies to spam the hell out of someone, since they agreed to be on the distribution list in exchange for $50 off their cybearm).
And, well, if I was going to BUY a cyberarm, I'd pay attention to anything I got that said "PRODUCT RECALL ON YOUR FUCKING ARM" that I got from the guys that built it for me.
But, okay. I don't want to argue just for arguments sake. If you think no one would bother to get their unsecure cyberarms upgraded (largely because the company couldn't get past their own spam filters, or because no one would pay attention to product recalls on their limbs), so be it. In your game, a bunch of people still have unsecure cyberlimbs, I guess. *shrug*
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 23 2007, 10:22 AM
Do YOU normally buy a cyberarm with an implanted commlink?
No. In fact, your commlink is the wireless device which recieves your incoming spam, and your commlink is that which decides, with whatever settings are on it, who and what gets filtered.
knasser
Jun 23 2007, 10:31 AM
QUOTE (Critias) |
And, well, if I was going to BUY a cyberarm, I'd pay attention to anything I got that said "PRODUCT RECALL ON YOUR FUCKING ARM" that I got from the guys that built it for me. |
Don't forget the, um, second hand market, also known as "Hey, that's my leg."
But for me, the issue is not so much whether cyberlimbs have wireless on or off (even when they do, the signal range is tiny), The question is whether you can hack someone's commlink and then proceed from there to hacking their cyberlimbs. The answer to that question renders the other question insignificant, given the signal ranges involved. (I.e. you can even do it in advance over the Matrix).
Rotbart van Dainig
Jun 23 2007, 10:48 AM
QUOTE (Synner) |
Wi-fi functionality provides complementary functions such as diagnostics, remote access, data storage, additional processing power, interfacing with implanted devices/software, etc (see the relevant examples of wi-fi usage as regards cyber in the BBB). |
Interfacing with other implants is usually done internally, as every implant comes with free hardwiring to other implants.
bait
Jun 23 2007, 11:52 AM
A couple of thoughts guys.
1.) There are areas/times when your required to have your comlink in active mode, think secure areas and during police sweeps. ( Hence having a fake SIN on board is a good idea.)
2.) Cyber tech would most likely be covered under the same idea, the "Why would joe cyber boy want to hide his tools from the police?" frame of mind.
Cyberware is also considered low brow technology, crude and for those hard up. ( Bioware is of course the way to go, if you have the access and the credit.)
Abbandon
Jun 23 2007, 03:24 PM
Whats so suprising about what the kid did? As soon as they got close enough he hacked them. Anything thats got wifi on or subbed to your commlink is fair game to a hacker. Techno's have built in commlinks.
Ravor
Jun 24 2007, 06:08 AM
QUOTE (Synner) |
I've repeated this several times now. Neural interfaces remain the primary control method for cybernetics of all kinds; cyber is still hardwired to your neural network and recieves commands from the brain directly - ie. cyberware works just fine if you have all your wi-fi turned off.
Wi-fi functionality provides complementary functions such as diagnostics, remote access, data storage, additional processing power, interfacing with implanted devices/software, etc (see the relevant examples of wi-fi usage as regards cyber in the BBB). |
Well all I know is that based off some of the discussions that I've been involved in here I'm not the only one who has gotten the impression that RAW encourages Deckers to hack cyberware in order to frag the other side.
Still if you said what I think you said its nice to know that I've been running this aspect of my campaigns the way that it was intended to be run.
Samantha
Jun 24 2007, 06:22 AM
You can easily hack cyberware even if it isn't broadcasting a wifi signal. All you have to do is either hack the comm that's controlling their PAN, or get at the hacker's. That's pretty much what the kid did in the short story.
Ravor
Jun 24 2007, 06:29 AM
Well that is what is at the crux of knasser's question and ShadowDragon8685's and my point, IF RAW encourages the idea of Deckers being able to hack into cyberware in order to frag the other team then RAW has a stupid take on this issue whether the Decker has to go through a commlink first or can directly zap the cyber.
However, based off Synner's post I'm not entirely sure that cyber was really meant to be hackable by every passing Decker.
Samantha
Jun 24 2007, 07:03 AM
You don't even need to get into the comm first if the enemy is dumb enough to leave their cyberware on wifi. Not to mention that Corptypes will keep their comm on to get incoming messages, etc.
With everything electronic and mechanicial made with wifi enabled by default, the world is a hacker's paradise.
Well, excluding anyone with a sense to get a firewall. Most hackers are script kiddy little freaks anyway, and they couldn't hack their way into a daycare.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 24 2007, 07:10 AM
One thing that makes me wonder...
I can certainly... Entertain... Not accept, though entertain... The notion that cyberware could be wireless, in order to transmit diagnostics and such...
Why do they need to recieve? Shoulden't/coulden't they be transmit only?
Anyway, Sammy, don't get too excited. You're not going to go hacking cybersammy's smartgun links or cyberarms and ordering them to fire on their teammates. If their eyes are set to recieve visual from someone else, it's possible... But you're definately not gonna shut down someone's cyberheart or anything.
Although if someone has a cranial bomb, you might figure out how to set it off.