ZenZen
Aug 7 2007, 03:39 AM
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
| @All: How's planning coming? |
Umm...I'd say our chars are staring at each other, wondering how they ended up with all these tight-lipped freaks, while figuring out how they are supposed to split 15 twenty pound notes between 8 greedy people without a major bloodbath...
From an OOC perspective it looks like we are waiting for
| QUOTE (Prae @ Aug 2 2007 @ 07:46 PM) |
| I'm reading through the Threads as we speak and will submit a post when I get back from class tonight. |
and
| QUOTE (DuckEggBlue Omega @ Aug 2 2007 @ 07:51 PM) |
| Good, because I'm waiting for everyone else to post their IC intro first, because, well because my charcater is that kind of person. |
to happen.
Makes me wonder if Prae lives around the north pole or something...
On a related note:
DEBO, are you still around? Well, you know, you didn't have to take the whole 'burning stake' thing
this literal.
Just consider yourself resurrected phoenix-style. Or, if that fails, I don't mind talking to a heap of slowly cooling ash neither...
| QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
| I Love Mind games! |
Feel free to join anytime.
I got enough firewood left. There's always a spot reserved for you in our group for mutual mental abuse.
Meriss
Aug 7 2007, 03:45 AM
@Zen: Yeah that was how I read it as well.
@Prae: Helllllllooooooo?
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 7 2007, 04:34 AM
Oh, I'm still here, and checking regularly. I am indeed waiting for Prae, since it would seem odd, after prompting the last remaining characters to introduce themselves before Arthur, for him to interupt them and introduce himself.
Aside from that I'm eager to respond to Alex's "snappy" comments that he's thinking about Arthur's status as a gentlemen based on his alleged poor etiquette (he doesn't need to fake being a gentleman with etiquette rolls, being that he actually IS meant to be one) with his own thoughts on people based on their etiquette. Mock my feeble arithmetic and roleplaying skills In Character will you!

I mean... introduce myself. I'm eager to introduce myself.
| QUOTE (F3.0) |
Oh, this should be fun! |
Perhaps [darkkhaki][italics] should be labelled: Thoughts AND things you would say 'in character' around a gaming table in an attempt at humour that would be followed immediately by declaring OOC some variation of "I'm not actually saying that out loud".
ZenZen
Aug 7 2007, 08:10 AM
| QUOTE (DEBO) |
| Oh, I'm still here, and checking regularly. |
[Frankenstein voice] IT IS ALIVE! *thunderclap* [/Frankenstein voice]

->
@DEBO:
[banter mode]

| QUOTE |
| Mock my feeble arithmetic and roleplaying skills In Character will you! |
Rest assured, I am mocking IC and I will keep on doing this as long as you keep on providing me with quirks that Alexander would spot and contemplate.
Now if you were talking about "speaking" them out, I'm sure there will be more than enough opportunities in the future, considering his less-than-stable personality and 'unique' views on certain things (I more-than-just-hinted at that in his background and the part of his thoughts that didn't mock your char - you read those as well, right?).
You only have to get him to talk some more (I know several ways to do this, but that would be telling again...) and voilĂ , you can start with the IC bashing as well, be it in darkkhaki or cyan.
| QUOTE |
| Perhaps [darkkhaki][italics] should be labelled: Thoughts AND things you would say 'in character' around a gaming table in an attempt at humour that would be followed immediately by declaring OOC some variation of "I'm not actually saying that out loud". |
You sure could do that, but why destroy one of the obvious advantages of PbP gaming: being able to
think at length in character, where the others can read it without reacting to it
IC, while keeping the 'attempt at humour' in the OOC-Thread for everyone to laugh about/tear apart and do away with the pesky "I'm not actually saying that out loud" part?
[/banter mode]
@All:
Who's in for a ritual summoning of Prae?
Critias
Aug 7 2007, 08:42 AM
I'm in for whatever'll get the dude posting.
Meriss
Aug 8 2007, 08:00 PM
@Gaslampers: Sorry guys I've been a bad GM. It looks like RL has eaten Prae. So I'll be puppeting Dr. Sebastian til the end of the meet and then moving him off stage.
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 8 2007, 08:22 PM
| QUOTE |
| Who's in for a ritual summoning of Prae? |
Do we get to.... err... I mean... have to sacrifice anything?
Redjack
Aug 8 2007, 08:52 PM
| QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
| Do we get to.... err... I mean... have to sacrifice anything? |
*Taking notes of evilness for future reference as GM*
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 9 2007, 01:14 AM
Okay, now finally down to business.
@Meriss: So have you heard from Prae at all or what? And if you're a bad GM, I must have played with some of the worst GM's on the planet.
@ZenZen
| QUOTE |
| Rest assured, I am mocking IC and I will keep on doing this as long as you keep on providing me with quirks that Alexander would spot and contemplate. |
Then perhaps you should make sure what he's contemplating is actually something out of place? It's common etiquette for introductions to be made from youngest to oldest (thank you internet for your copius sites on all things victorian), and to have to be prompted to introduce yourself because you ignored this... you'd think a german aristocrat would know better.

| QUOTE |
| You sure could do that, but why destroy one of the obvious advantages of PbP gaming: being able to think at length in character, where the others can read it without reacting to it IC, while keeping the 'attempt at humour' in the OOC-Thread for everyone to laugh about/tear apart and do away with the pesky "I'm not actually saying that out loud" part? |
What? It DOES ignore the 'pesky' not saying it out loud part, and the 'giant key' and 'carnival sideshow' remarks wouldn't be nearly as funny in the OOC thread. Not sure what your point is, mine was to change the description for darkkhaki+italics to more accurately reflect how it IS being used, not to change what it does.
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 9 2007, 02:55 AM
| QUOTE (DEBO) |
| It's common etiquette for introductions to be made from youngest to oldest |
YAY! my character's 20! Three cheers for accidental etiquette!
Meriss
Aug 9 2007, 02:59 AM
@DEBO: Not yet but I PMed him and he ain't reponded yet. Sooo, I'm going to go out on a limb and say RL ate him fer now. I'll be puppeting Dr. John till the end of the meet.
Critias
Aug 9 2007, 12:23 PM
A Dwarven Inventor seems like he just might be the least physically imposing person in the room. Han votes to give the money to the one that's easiest to chase and overcome.
ZenZen
Aug 9 2007, 06:07 PM
@DEBO
| QUOTE |
| It's common etiquette for introductions to be made from youngest to oldest (thank you internet for your copius sites on all things victorian), and to have to be prompted to introduce yourself because you ignored this... you'd think a german aristocrat would know better. |
Heh, didn't expect this for sure (curse you, internet, for teaching DEBO in all things victorian behind my back

).
I still consider prompting others to introduce themselves before doing it yourself to be ruder than being 'late' with your own introduction, so I guess they either changed the rules since then or my etiquette skill is as low as Alexanders' (he might be from an aristocratic family, but spending most of your time alone in a lab doesn't really help refining your manners...).
| QUOTE |
| Not sure what your point is, [...] |

*reads his own post again* *scratches head* Hmmm... not sure what my point was neither
...and you're to blame!You gave me The Silent Treatment, making me yearn for some banter, for ...for
anything, any statement to twist around until it's become some hideous monstrosity of an idea that even its metaphorical mother couldn't love.
With each passing hour my craving for pointless wrangling grew, soon reaching critical levels at the strain-scale, and then, after 5 agonizing days without innocent victims to direct my stream of arbitrary senselessness at, I...
*begins sobbing*
...I was desperate enough to try to argue on points I actually agree to, ...you ...you
monster!*imagine some collapsing & bursting into tears at this point*
[Seriously: show some responsibility you inconsiderate oaf!]
@All except DEBO (I'm mad at you now! *sulk*)
| QUOTE (fistan) |
| Three cheers for accidental etiquette! |
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
| It looks like RL has eaten Prae. |
While this sounds like a plausible option considering the always famished RL, informed circles suspect a workplace accident instead:
We all know that Prae has been handling these horribly sharp and pointy lightsabers at work and, well, the obvious had to happen (reference case: Skywalker vs. Skywalker).
Standard procedure would of course be to wait until 2019 to fit him with a health-insurance covered cyber replacement hand (ASIST interface requires additional investment from the patient). Barring that, we can only wait until the force is strong enough in him to target the buttons of his keyboard seperately, because the summoning ritual will be quite difficult to accomplish.
Though if you're still up to it, Critias and fistandantilus3.0b, we need capable multigrade initiate mages who all learned 'Slay (Slacker)' (that's a widely used spell every middle management corporate wagemage should know) and are capable of summoning and binding spirits of the dead (petro houngan or necromancers would be ideal).
*looks around for any signs of Redjack* Oh, and bring some ...assistants, to ...uh, help with the ritual as ...donors, if you know what I mean. And no ...urban outdoorsmen with pharmaceutical/electronic addiction issues, they don't ...show enough dedication for to matter. Small children are much better (and easier to carry).
[edit: Just realized that in SR4 rules, essence rating doesn't matter for sacrificing any more. Hooray for junkie slaughtering! Makes the job much easier.

]
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
| So I'll be puppeting Dr. Sebastian til the end of the meet and then moving him off stage. |
Hm, that's an option as well, but don't forget to consider the usual gm-moves-absent-pc-off-stage options:
-'quick and messy': spontaneous, unannounced death *cough*
| QUOTE (Critias about Han) |
| [...] so he just stands around quietly and waits for it to become obvious who he's supposed to murder to do his part. |
*cough*
-'feeling generous today': pc falls into a deep coma
-'need another plot hook': pc gets captured by [insert antagonist here] with only [deadline] until the sacrifice/experiment/torture/execution/etc. begins
-'evil twist': gm plays pc who betrays team in a dramatic fashion after a while
| QUOTE (Critias) |
| A Dwarven Inventor seems like he just might be the least physically imposing person in the room. Han votes to give the money to the one that's easiest to chase and overcome. |

Fear the short ones! (you know at which height their punches land...)
ludomastro
Aug 9 2007, 08:19 PM
@ Meriss
What does our friendly slueth know about these neighborhoods, if anything?
marghos
Aug 9 2007, 08:24 PM
| QUOTE (Alex) |
@ Meriss
What does our friendly slueth know about these neighborhoods, if anything? |
Same question but this time its Martin who is askin' this....
Meriss
Aug 9 2007, 08:32 PM
@Alex and marghos: Roll any appropriate Knowledge Skills.
Ditto for the rest of you.
marghos
Aug 9 2007, 11:03 PM
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
@Alex and marghos: Roll any appropriate Knowledge Skills.
|
So what is appropriate knowledge skill in this case?
Is it London underground?
[ Spoiler ]
*Navigation maybe some bonus from here, but thats not knowledge skill! And Martin doesn't have it

(In the army now and doesn't know how to move place a to place b... hmmm)
[ Spoiler ]
*Is there any way to use Memory to gain some bonus? If character has visited the area of neighbourhood or even the same building?
[ Spoiler ]
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 10 2007, 02:16 AM
@F3.0
| QUOTE |
| Three cheers for accidental etiquette! |
Indeed, though I don't think it would have mattered. It's all part of an order of importance type thing, age was just the one element that was easiest to be sure of IC, being that a 35yo man in Victorian London would be noticeably older than a 25yo. Introducing yourself early would be a display of humility, which is never a bad thing. Technically the foriegners probably should have gone first, speaking of which...
@ZenZen
| QUOTE (ZenZen) |
| Heh, didn't expect this for sure... |
Bull, Horns, etc.
I was initially just annoyed I made yet another mistake my character shouldn't have (after being provoked into action by some unscrupulous individual OOC who then pointed out the error IC), but then realised there might be some official etiquette of the time that would overrule the 'common courtesy' we use today, that I could use in my favour. It was a few tense moments where I had to check everyone else did the standard 20something runner, if not that I was going to have to fall back on the whole order of status thing, which wouldn't have been as convincing I don't think. As for prompting an intro, the way I see it is in a rigid society like this there is no 'ruder'. There is an etiquette to things and you either follow it or you don't.
| QUOTE |
...you're to blame!...
*begins sobbing* ...I was desperate enough to try to argue on points I actually agree to, ...you ...you monster! *imagine some collapsing & bursting into tears at this point*
[Seriously: show some responsibility you inconsiderate oaf!] |
I don't like to use netisms like 'LOL' (heck, I think I've used more smilies in this thread than I have in the entire time I been using the world wide webiverse) but is there one for "giggling like a school girl with pure, unadulterated glee at the torment I've wrought"?
I gladly accept responsibilty, credit where credit's due and all.
That'll learn him for not just telling me the origin of his character's name and pointing out my poor math skills! BWA HAHAHAHA!
@Meriss: I have no appropriate skill (if the campaign should ever venture into Oxford...), but is it possibly that I could roll something like Arthur's Londons Theatre Scene knowledge skill to see if say, the Johansenns are a patron of the arts?
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 10 2007, 02:39 AM
| QUOTE (DEBO) |
| everyone else did the standard 20something runner, |
I have to say that I now feel thoroughly bad for being a sterotype. With this char, I was specifically going for a noob "runner", just kicked out of his family ,etc.
Now , I know it's a bit hard to judge tone properly on the net, but is it just me, or does this OOC seem a bit tense?
Meriss
Aug 10 2007, 03:11 AM
*Meriss begins juggling ..... badly*
And the tenseness is gone.
Meriss
Aug 10 2007, 03:38 AM
@Gaslampers: *Points to badly considered effort to get players to roll the bones.*
That'll learn me to post without my notes. Also can you guys post your improved knowledge skills. (Since you spent the CSP I handed out)
Alex: London Underworld at a -1 will do fer now. Also Investigative Methods will yield ways to find out where the addies are.
marghos: I'll also take a london high soceity roll at +1. You may contact your High soceity contact.
[ Spoiler ]
London Underground: The name Johansenn is not heard in Londons backalleys, of that Marty is sure
Memory: There is a fuzzy recollection somewhere in the back of your mind, your wife Francesca waving politely at a tall raven haired woman across a theatre lobby, "That's Margret Johannsenn" she says
Navigation: You are unclear how to get to Charles St. In fact you may have a hard time getting home.
Fist: I'll take a London High Society roll to see if you know of the Johansenns, you may take a +1 since they are fairly well known in that circle.
Critias: A Logic roll since The Hand has no appplicable Knowledge Skills. You may also call your high society contact as well.
Voorhees: Logic roll. Bismarck does what he says.

Zen: Opera knowledge -1 might get you a memory of seeing the Johansenns at an opera or two. If Lex goes out that is.
DEBO: Theatre Scene roll, or try your contacts.
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 10 2007, 03:51 AM
Thanks, I didn't really know if there was any way to know what would apply.
[ Spoiler ]
Logic 5
London High Society 2
= 7
Base Threshold 1
6,2,5,1,5,4,4 = 3 net
Critias
Aug 10 2007, 04:20 AM
Logic 2.
Fantastically impressive, mentally (1 hit).EDIT: It just occured to me I don't have any way to get ahold of my contact (no phone or commlink or what-have-you), so nevermind on that one. So I went ahead and deleted my second roll (to attempt to get ahold of my contact).
EDIT EDIT: I also just realized I'm (obviously) doing something wrong with my Invisible Castle rolls. Every time I click the link to go look at one, it's rolling the dice again for a different result. I had a 1, 5, the first time (for the first roll). Is there some formating secret I'm screwing up? I've just been copying/pasting the address bar once it displays my roll...I guess maybe I should start using the link provided in the text itself. My bad.
Fresno Bob
Aug 10 2007, 04:22 AM
ZenZen
Aug 10 2007, 04:41 AM
@DEBO
| QUOTE |
| everyone else did the standard 20something runner |
Heh, in the mental picture I originally designed Lex after he was older as well, but then I decided that I wanted him to be a little dwarfling during The Great Exhibition and that limited my age options considerably, so he had no choice but to be a 'standard' 20something as well...
| QUOTE |
"giggling like a school girl with pure, unadulterated glee [...] BWA HAHAHAHA! |

Aussie schoolgirls are scary.
| QUOTE |
| I don't like to use netisms like 'LOL' (heck, I think I've used more smilies in this thread than I have in the entire time I been using the world wide webiverse)[...] |
[evil genius voice] Yes, yes ...YESSS!! My corruptive influence spreads further and further in him, mercilessly consuming what's left of his essence, sucking the marrow of purity from his bones, tainting the feeble leftovers of his spirit until his twisted, empty shell either collapses or surrenders! *guttural aussie schoolgirl giggle* [/evil genius voice]
@All
| QUOTE (fistan) |
| Now , I know it's a bit hard to judge tone properly on the net, but is it just me, or does this OOC seem a bit tense? |
Nah, all's fair on my side (and that's the only side that matters, after all), relax.
Oh, wait...no...nooo....
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
| *Meriss begins juggling ..... badly* |
*breathes heavily* You're making me angry. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry. *roars as everything except The Incredible Spandex Pants tears apart*
"Hulk Smash!"
@Meriss:
| QUOTE |
| Zen: Opera knowledge -1 might get you a memory of seeing the Johansenns at an opera or two. If Lex goes out that is. |
He's actually more of a gramophone person (I kinda assumed them to be already invented in your timeline...).
marghos
Aug 10 2007, 05:57 AM
| QUOTE (Meriss) |
marghos: I'll also take a london high soceity roll at +1. You may contact your High soceity contact.
|
I'm not sure how to contact Sir Edward Woodward (L2/C3) this company guy and old family friend. So lets forget it for now, maybe later Martin writes a letter to him.
But then this knowledge skill roll Knowledge skill: (
Knowledge: High society 3 + Logic 2 + 1 (3, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4 = No hits)
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 10 2007, 03:46 PM
@Meriss:
2 London Theatre Scene + 5 Logic for 3 hits. Not sure how helpful that skill is going to be though (read: not very), so I'll definately get onto my contacts as soon as I can.
Questions: Exactly how much detail am I going to get from my 20, Rating 6 maps of London? Am I likely to be able to get an idea of sewage works and telephone cabling from them?
@F3.0
| QUOTE |
I have to say that I now feel thoroughly bad for being a sterotype. With this char, I was specifically going for a noob "runner", just kicked out of his family ,etc.
Now , I know it's a bit hard to judge tone properly on the net, but is it just me, or does this OOC seem a bit tense? |
I wasn't aware of any tension (admissions of sobbing and maniacal laughter tend to undermine such an atmoshpere) but if it's anything to do with my 'standard 20something' remark, I certainly didn't mean it to make anyone feel bad about stereotypes, there's a reason most runners (especially starting characters) tend to be that age. Any younger is too young and any older is someone who should probably be on a higher power level. And it's not like I decided I wanted an 'older character', the ONLY reason my own character wasn't in that same group is because I got the birthdate directly from what could be a significant event in this setting.
ZenZen
Aug 10 2007, 04:49 PM
| QUOTE (DEBO) |
| I wasn't aware of any tension (admissions of sobbing and maniacal laughter tend to undermine such an atmoshpere)[...] |
Alright, alright...I'll try harder next time to create some tense maniacal laughter...*sigh*
| QUOTE (DEBO) |
| [...]the ONLY reason my own character wasn't in that same group is because I got the birthdate directly from what could be a significant event in this setting. |
Behold! Don't let your minds be clouded with unrelated events like Halley's Comet reaching its closest point to the sun, the true reason for choosing the 16th of November 1835 as Prof. Arthur Pendington date of birth is of course
'Eugenio Beltrami', the italian mathematician who was not only born on the same day, no, his name is also an almost exact anagram of this scheming player:
'trini Eg Blue omea'!
A thinly veiled and way too easily solved mystery indeed...
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 10 2007, 05:12 PM
| QUOTE |
| I certainly didn't mean it to make anyone feel bad about stereotypes |
No that was my own concerns for myself. The 'tense' was more in regards to etiquette debates. As I said though, that could well just be from the difficulties of getting 'tone' through text. *shrug* I just didn't want to see character issues spill to out of character. No worries then.
ludomastro
Aug 10 2007, 06:29 PM
OK, back from my training class and ready to roll some ... well, I would say bones, but my dice are more like plastic ... so:
4 (Underworld Knowledge) + 3 (Logic) -1 (GM) = 6 dice
2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5 = 1 success
4 (Investigative Methods) + 4 (Intuition) = 7 dice
1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6 = 2 successes
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 10 2007, 06:57 PM
@ZenZen: Well done Axl, but it's not 'trini'. You take the 'e' from 'blue' to make 'initre' which after you change the 'i's to 'a's, becomes 'anatre'. Which everyone knows is italian for 'ducks', OR it's actually tri-g, to make 3 g's, so you get In Egg Blue Omega and everyone knows the phrase 'to duck in'. I can't remeber which for some STRANGE reason. Now figure out Pendington (Arthur is just a good sounding british name).
| QUOTE (F3.0) |
As I said though, that could well just be from the difficulties of getting 'tone' through text. *shrug* I just didn't want to see character issues spill to out of character. No worries then.  |
Actually, making sure of the tone was why I started off using so many smilies (usually I don't care if random internet people misinterpret, but this is obviously a different situation) so I can see how when I stopped using them it looked like the tone had changed for the worse. My bad.
If anything I think it's going the otherway... I don't think Lex would have been as eager to comment on Arthur's etiquette if it hadn't been implied OOC he was named after Axl Rose or a LOST character, which he TOTALLY is by the way.
Meriss
Aug 11 2007, 02:06 AM
Righto, answers in order of rolls
@fist:
[ Spoiler ]
The Johansenns are Jason and Margret. They are well known in London high soceity circles often throwing lavish parites at their homes. They have a large spacious house at 2100 Charles Street. They have one child, Charles Johansenn aged 10.
@Critias:
[ Spoiler ]
The Johansenns are Jason and Margret. They are well known in London high soceity. You assume they have a house at 2100 Charles Street.
@Voorhees: Bismarck struggles mightily but does not know anything about the Johansenns.
@Zen: Yup Gramaphones are around, you can roll logic if you want.
@marghos:
[ Spoiler ]
Although Martin knows the name and something of the womans face. He doesn't seem to know anything about the Johansenns proper
@DEBO:
[ Spoiler ]
The Johansenns frequent the theatres of London at least once every week on Fridays. They always sit in a private box, away from the masses. They have a long term lease box in Albert Hall. (For 999 yerars no less!)
The maps you have will give you exact location of streets along with general block number references. One map at least has a full diagram of the sewers and pipelines, but surely a
gentleman would not think of entering such fetid environs
@Alex:
[ Spoiler ]
Underworld
The Johansenns are Jason and Margret. They are well known in London high soceity. They have a house at 2100 Charles Street.
Investigative methods
The Johansenns should have plans listed with the city for their home. The Bakers also should have property tax records. A cabby could be bribed or forced into revealing the locations of any of the addresses.
Critias
Aug 11 2007, 05:18 AM
For the record, I'm only sulking
in character, not out here in real life.
Somebody's made Han's list, though. THE list. *cue dramatic music*
Since someone made the suggestion that one mojo guy should be sure to be with any group that recon'ed the sites, it made sense (to Han, and me), to have one techie guy with each group, too. Then you split up the muscle a little bit, and voila! We've got two small groups of guys scoping out two houses each for any obvious magical or technological security (instead of one group of eight guys tromping all over, going to all four).
But fiiiiiiiiiine. The absent-minded professor doesn't
like Han's addition to someone else's plan. He'd rather get punched in the brain some time for being rude. That's okay, too! It's his call.
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 11 2007, 06:41 AM
@Meriss
| QUOTE |
| One map at least has a full diagram of the sewers and pipelines, but surely a gentleman would not think of entering such fetid environs. |
Well that's what we have the dwarf for, they like it underground, right?
Now I just need to know how/where telephone cables are laid, I was guessing perhaps underground in the sewers. And you requested updated knowledge skills, does this mean we can spend the CSP we've earned since the game started?
@Critias: Well "Arthur" thinks that splitting up into 'teams' for any reason is ultimately a bad idea. There's no reason to go everywhere together, it makes sense for the 2 magic user to decide between them whos going to check out which locale and such, but if you divide into teams and say one group decides that the best way to get to a key is to bluff their way in but the character with the best social skills or most appropriate contacts has already been assigned to the other team who have decided stealth is the best option or if one teams hits their 2 targets days before the other team which alerts the company that someone is after the keys, and hence move the item or improve security which will screw over the other teams plans and so on. As said, the jobs are ultimately linked and if the 2 groups get too independant, it'll end up causing trouble one way or another.
And from a metagaming aspect Dr John is leaving, meaning one group would be short a mage anyway.
Critias
Aug 11 2007, 06:54 AM
I was never under the impression the two groups were
hitting the houses seperately -- we're only talking about going to take a look at them. When going to take a look at a house you plan to burglarize, it seems like a good idea to bring along a guy that knows gadgets and gizmos and locks and security stuff (along with a guy that knows wards and magic).
More importantly, it seems like "yeah, we split into two groups and each group goes and scopes out two of the houses, here's some perception dice" would be a good way for the GM to then give us a shovel full of information based on what the experts saw at each of the houses (with the mundane and combat-oriented guys split up among each group just for fluff, as insurance, and so no one's standing around doing nothing) -- and
voila, the game can move forward.

And Dr John wasn't leaving at the time the initial post(s) in question were made, I don't think.
ZenZen
Aug 11 2007, 07:33 PM
@DEBO
QUOTE
Now figure out Pendington (Arthur is just a good sounding british name).
Well obviously Harry ...I mean Arthur is just some random name you picked, but Pendington is way too easy to figure out as well:
"Ride the gender bending rollercoaster of Mr. "Pantyman" Pendington's victories and defeats here"Seriously though, this gives an interesting twist to the whole impotence issue...
@Meriss
Okay, logic it is then:
[ Spoiler ]
Logic 5: [3,6,6,3,2] = 2 hits
LinkRegarding communication:
As there is no wireless technology around, it's safe to assume that even simple radio transmitters just don't exist in this setting, right?
Telephones are around, but how common are they? Does every house have a telephone line? Is it expensive and thus limited? What about public things like a phone booth?
Cabs (or other mobile services). Do they drive around all the time and you have to wave them over if you want to use them? Do they wait in taxi-lots where you have to go to if you need their services (maybe there is a phone booth at the lot to call one over to your house)?
How am I supposed to get in contact with my personal cabbie (especially when he just drives off without asking me if he should wait until I finish my business in this shady part of town)?
[Mental note to self:

Holy time-consuming IC post, Batman! Got to either write shorter or become a lot faster in staying long-winded.]
Meriss
Aug 12 2007, 01:20 AM
@DEBO: I thought you spent it already. My bad. You can spend it any time you are not actively "on stage". An IC post summarizing the basic intent will do.
@Zen:
[ Spoiler ]
The Johansenns are a high class family and live at 2100 Charles St. They must have a great deal of money. Especially living in the Regency neighbourhood
Simple radios do exist but they are mostly limited to military and high class amateurs. About 60% of high class people have a phone of some kind. Phone booths exist but only in good neighbourhoods. Mobile services combine the two approches, flagging and stands. You can also call them from your home if you have a phone.
The pub should have a phone, if it don't maybe you'd better ask one of your new
friends to walk with you to a cab stand.
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 13 2007, 01:22 AM
@Meriss: I spent the CSP for doing the questionnaire because you awarded it during character creation, but not the CSP you've given me for stuff since then. We can buy new knowledge skills, correct?
@Critias:
| QUOTE |
| I was never under the impression the two groups were hitting the houses seperately -- we're only talking about going to take a look at them. |
Yes, but one is likely to lead to the other and besides which there's no real reason for a 'team' to go do that. Why do the mages/tech guys need muscle around for them to just go and look at the house? If you want to look at it from a fluff point of view so no one's standing around doing nothing, that's EXACTLY what they'll be doing if they play escort, better they go meet with their own contacts in the meantime and see what other info they can dig up.
@ZenZen:
| QUOTE |
Well obviously Harry ...I mean Arthur is just some random name you picked, but Pendington is way too easy to figure out as well: "Ride the gender bending rollercoaster of Mr. "Pantyman" Pendington's victories and defeats here" Seriously though, this gives an interesting twist to the whole impotence issue... |
Yes it would, but that's not it. You're unlikely to ever actually discover the real reason for it, unless you happen to guess. Basically, I had just finished the questionnaire and background and realised I should atleast give him a name before submitting it, so I deleted where I'd written "Name Pending" and... you get the idea. And yes I originally called him Harry, again because I was just wanting a name to slap on before hitting submit, but I didn't like it, so when Meriss asked for my character name again, I took the oppurtunity to change it.
And let me see if I understand this correctly. Lex stands up (to aid projection and establish authority one would geuss), repeats the exact same opinion Arthur had, only in MORE detail, and this is somehow LESS arrogant and LESS patronising?
@All: And what's with the hate - I only glitched the etiquette test, not critically glitched.
Meriss
Aug 13 2007, 02:49 AM
@DEBO: Yes you may buy new knowledge skills with CSP, 4 points for rating 1
ZenZen
Aug 13 2007, 03:10 AM
@DEBO
QUOTE
Yes it would, but that's not it.
Yeah, right.

That's what you say now, but I'm not convinced until you provide some proof.
QUOTE
And let me see if I understand this correctly. Lex stands up (to aid projection and establish authority one would geuss), \\
Wowowowaitaminute. Where did you read that?
QUOTE
\\ repeats the exact same opinion Arthur had, only in MORE detail, \\
Yep. He even
acknowledges that Arthurs argument was sound.
QUOTE
\\ and this is somehow LESS arrogant and LESS patronising?
That's what he was
aiming for, yes.
He knew that from a rational point of view, this plan is the most efficient one.
He saw that Pendington made his point and it was largely rejected/ignored, so he looked for the cause and identified the professors excessively elaborate choice of words and undertone of superiority as main source of discord (it could not have been the plan itself, because everyone
naturally agrees to logic and reason, right?).
Problem recognized? Check.
Source identified? Check.
->Eliminate source of problem ->Restart.
Of course he would have preferred opening the maintenance hatch to everyones head and simply rewiring your badly synchronised brains, but alas, he had to use crude, complicated and unreliable means like verbal input (not his strength for sure).
QUOTE
And what's with the hate - I only glitched the etiquette test, not critically glitched.
No hate from Alex. He just thinks that you're either a strange poser or something that makes even less sense than that.
DuckEggBlue Omega
Aug 13 2007, 06:29 PM
| QUOTE (ZenZen) |
| No hate from Alex. He just thinks that you're either a strange poser or something that makes even less sense than that. |
Not hate exactly, but noone has even a neutral opinion of him, let alone a positive one. Unless Lex considers 'arrogant poser with poor arithmetic skills' neutral?
I would have sworn it said Lex stood up before speaking, but in anycase longer explanations with shorter words rarely comes across as less patronising, and thinking in his head that the 'professor' MIGHT have a point BUT, isn't an acknowlegdement, it's begrudging admittance.
Critias
Aug 13 2007, 08:21 PM
For what it's worth, Han just doesn't like pretty much anybody (except a few folks in Chinatown, and, in theory, plenty of folks back "home" in China). So no one feel bad about that, and certainly no one mistake his disdain for Westerners for me not liking the game/other players/GM/whatever.
Meriss
Aug 14 2007, 02:51 AM
@Gaslampers: Okay guys if we're all finished sniping at one another.

Is anyone opposed to ending the chapter and moving on? If I end it now you all get home safe, and get ready to start assessing the houses. Also if you are going to split into two team I'll be creating two IC threads, using this as our rolling home m'kay?
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 14 2007, 04:48 AM
I really think two teams/threads is the way to go. It's
very busy in there with 7 people + GM.
For what it's worth, I vote for going on the team that Arthur isn't on.

Nothing against the player, the character is precisely the type I wrote in to Spence's background as the type of person he hates being around. I';d rather do that than have IC friction personally. But hey, ,that's just me.
ludomastro
Aug 14 2007, 05:01 AM
I'm good with the splitting up thing. No preference for Jacob on which group.
marghos
Aug 14 2007, 06:13 AM
| QUOTE (Alex) |
| I'm good with the splitting up thing. |
Me too, no problemo

Lets see in which group
Martin is going to be...
Fresno Bob
Aug 14 2007, 06:48 AM
I'm fine with that idea.
Critias
Aug 14 2007, 05:35 PM
Let's just do whatever, man. I thought the team thing got shot down, but we need to do SOMEthing.
marghos
Aug 14 2007, 09:15 PM
Hmmm lets think this one, one more time? I'm been thinkin' this our problem...
We have 8 "wannabe runners" and no-one is 'pure' leader, sounds that we have somekind of trouble here...
But for real, what our (near break up) team need is leader, at least one leader who makes the calls and makes others move and who will say what to do.
fistandantilus4.0
Aug 15 2007, 05:04 AM
I posted up an IC reason for getting a gourp thing going (platonic) if some folks wanted to do more team, some more independant. Hopefully that'll help move things along.