Nightwalker450
Dec 20 2007, 04:34 PM
The FASA got into what people want for a Shadowrun MMO. I'm spinning off this Topic so people can post what they would envision in a Shadowrun MMO. Maybe if there are developers working on this, they'll see this and take notes. (We can hope can't we?)
Nightwalker450
Dec 20 2007, 04:35 PM
(From FASA Forums)
Our Shadowrun got derailed for a couple hours discussing how we thought the Shadowrun MMO should be set up. I thought I'd post some of what I remember of our discussions on here.
-Guild Wars (WoW and City of Heros also use but not as the main) set up, most runs are done through instances.
-This said, we don't want a World, we want Seattle or some other Major City, with effort going into what we have not how big it is. They can do expansion Hong Kong later if they want.
-Many Instances would be able to Randomly Generate (Maps, Goons, etc.) for the basic Extraction, Wet Work, basic scenario runs. This results in more instances for less work.
-City of Heros style contacts, ie Johnsons as well.
-Triple Layer world, Physical, Astral, and Matrix, characters would be able to perform and view the different levels. Most Matrix could be done without entering the actual Matrix Layer (ie AR), but for hacking enter Matrix World.
-At times, have no Jobs available except for a single "On the Run", that would basically be Lone Star is after you or such and you will have to perform a series of tasks to loose the heat. Probably some type of "Karma Cap" similar to Final Fantasy XI's.
-Parts of the on the run might require you to get rid of particular items that have been compromised.
-Getting high end gear would be an instance in itself, possibly stealing from a company. With the costs being paying the contacts, blackmarket for the information.
-Death during a mission effectively would remove you from the mission (Luckily SR has quick stabilization/First Aid rules already in place to get you back on your feet, just remove the 1 try per wound and we're good), ie you receive no further Karma for the mission other than completion if your team still completes and reward for the same reason
-Safehouses for teams! Customizable again in City of Hero's style.
-Personal Pads, to store drones/vehicles things that aren't easily put into your pocket, or at least you shouldn't be seen regularly on the street with. Upgraded with Lifestyle investments! (You're monthly RL payments get you Squatter Lifestyle )
-Drones basically summoner style pets, unless you jumped into them.
-Yes we want vehicles! I don't know how to pull this off to make people happy, and keep realities in check. Some vehicles would be go anywhere (skates, skateboards, hoverboards...), Larger vehicles would need to go to your pad, or possibly have instances be within the space of a city block, so you could park in the instance. Or if the instance involves a chase you need a car for it.
-Factions (Gangers, Runners, Lone Star, Doc Wagon) completely different style of instance, perhaps these would be sets of instances available so you could act as one or any of these based on reputations. Start out as ganger, and develop into different role depending on which instances you do.
On Drops
-Very limited carrying capacity, larger pad, and safehouse storages.
-Diablo II style carrying capacities, larger items result in less capacity
-Add a weight restriction as well.
-Can loot practically all goons for ammo/weapons.
-Most Nuyen is gained from the instance runs payout. Most gear is bought, or crafted. Similar to Final Fantasy XI. Black Market Auction Houses.
-Equipment should be very fluid, we're runners not investors. Very rarely should we become attached to an item, we need to be able to ditch it when the heat is on. This is a very FPS aspect, if you're out of ammo, loot and hope they have the type you need, or ditch your gun and steal the security guards.
-Mages will be on the Nuyen train as well if they need to get materials for spells (not standard SR, but needed here for balance)
-Cybered, have cost of cyber repair added on to your medical costs.
-Hackers... Fry the commlinks, or even just the software, like Cybered they need to get their comms repaired at times.
-Make Lifestyle Increases look very tempting, spiced with costs of repairs, to keep Nuyen from piling up. Pay your contacts once in a while.
End result is a FPS, with the MMO flavor of reputation, equipment, and Karma. You develop a character instead of being thrown into a 30 minute arena with guns. We're on the side of we want the Shadowrun world, not an MMO as exists now.
nezumi
Dec 20 2007, 05:27 PM
Pink mohawks, electric guitars, spandex and spray paints. And no fraggin' commlinks! And no elves either. Dandelion-eating, panty-waisted fruits.
IF they were to do an MMO, I think the most awesome way to do it is basically have the corporations create jobs, which have a set amount of money available to spend. In some jobs (like being a Johnson) you pocket the difference. In others (security designer) you get the same pay regardless, and the money available for security gear is ONLY for that. Anyway, so these jobs are set up. Jobs that aren't taken can be taken by NPCs to a degree (i.e. designers do it), but the salary gradually goes up, naturally replicating a genuine capitalist environment. Jobs would include stuff like being a Johnson, rigging up a secure network, creating corporate facilities, etc. This allows people to be creative, like second life, within reason (since there are clear goals which must be met and limits on what they can use in their creations). Ultimately though, it frees up the designers and makes the whole world seem more free. The computer would have a criteria to determine successful designs, and those with better designs get more reputation and are hired for higher profile jobs later on.
So for instance, at the beginning there are 8 corps offering jobs for facility architect. Each is paying 10-50k, and has 100-200k to spend on that gear. People take the jobs, create their designs, thereby making several 'maps' for each corporation. As the game picks up steam, some companies continue to offer only smaller deals, but big mega-corps like Ares increase the size of their contracts. They start paying 50-100k or more, with millions of nuyen in their budget, but only hire designers who have successfully scored lots of 'points' on previous designs.
The designers then actually know the maps and likely put back doors in. That makes them valuable to people of other jobs, and gives them an 'in' on the streets, plus a second method of income and a lot more fun when they're set on a run involving their map. Meanwhile the computer will shift through different facility maps for different runs or other purposes, and a determined runner can actually find out the name of the designer of a given facility. Over time older or less successful facility maps are deleted, keeping things fresh, especially as new security equipment is made available.
You have PC Johnsons. They're given a set amount of money and a goal they need to achieve. They can go about it however they want, as long as certain conditions are met. If they decide to pocket the change and try for the job themselves, that's their option, although if they fail, it reflects a lot more poorly on the J because he's lost plausible deniability.
People say that the problem with an SR MMO is that it requires so many NPCs, so many maps and so on, without their seeing lots of use. The solution is simple, just like it is in real life; outsource it. I'd MUCH rather spend time designing an entire level I know other Shadowrunners will have to work through rather than spend time building a chair or whatever you do in WoW.
Oh yeah, and make sure there's a Punk Rocker 'job'.
Kagetenshi
Dec 20 2007, 05:29 PM
Ewww, instanced missions…
~J
DireRadiant
Dec 20 2007, 05:41 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Ewww, instanced missions…
~J |
Let's get online into a multi player shared environment and then isolate ourselves and play away from everyone else.
Thanee
Dec 20 2007, 06:15 PM
QUOTE (DireRadiant) |
Let's get online into a multi player shared environment and then isolate ourselves and play away from everyone else. |
In fact, it's the only way to handle it... both from the server load and from the annoying players perspective.

When there will be a Shadowrun MMORPG, I definitely would not want it to follow the typical MMO pattern of NPCs standing around with yellow signs above their head providing missions.
Bye
Thanee
Kagetenshi
Dec 20 2007, 06:22 PM
QUOTE (Thanee) |
In fact, it's the only way to handle it... both from the server load and from the annoying players perspective. |
At least the first reason is obviously false—after all, the reason the industry went to instanced dungeons was because it was one way to fix the undesirable results generated by Ultima Online's noninstanced dungeons. Since it has been done (and indeed is still being done by certain MMOGs), it's obviously possible to make the servers handle the load.
The second, I would argue, is also false, but demonstrating it isn't as trivial so I'll let it be.
~J
nezumi
Dec 20 2007, 06:38 PM
Just to be clear, 'instanced' dungeons are ones which are pre-generated, whereas non-instanced aren't? Having not played enough dungeon games to really appreciate the difference beyond all the negative comments I've read here, why is one preferable over the other?
Thanee
Dec 20 2007, 06:40 PM
There is also the reason, that you sometimes want to tell a story with a small group of heroes, not a huge mass of them, of course, partially to allow everyone to shine and be in the center of the story sometimes, but the other two (lag and interferance by other players) are the primary reasons for instances (at least according to wikipedia

).
Bye
Thanee
Thanee
Dec 20 2007, 06:41 PM
QUOTE (nezumi) |
Just to be clear, 'instanced' dungeons are ones which are pre-generated, whereas non-instanced aren't? Having not played enough dungeon games to really appreciate the difference beyond all the negative comments I've read here, why is one preferable over the other? |
Instances are not necessarily pre-generated. They are created on demand.
Like when there are ten groups all wanting to slay the dragon or rob the bank simultaneously there will be ten such dungeons (one instance for each group) as opposed to a single one hosting all of them together.
Bye
Thanee
Kagetenshi
Dec 20 2007, 06:45 PM
QUOTE (nezumi @ Dec 20 2007, 01:38 PM) |
Just to be clear, 'instanced' dungeons are ones which are pre-generated, whereas non-instanced aren't? Having not played enough dungeon games to really appreciate the difference beyond all the negative comments I've read here, why is one preferable over the other? |
"Instanced" dungeons are ones where, each time a group enters, a new one is created for that group—as such, two different groups cannot meet within the dungeon, and what one group does within does not affect the others.
An instanced dungeon has several advantages. One is that each instance is completely separate from every other instance, so they can be managed on different hardware without introducing network access. Another is that, if the world is small or certain areas highly interesting, or otherwise large numbers of people will be drawn to congregate in one place, the dungeon doesn't end up packed full of people, and if there's some specific event like a boss that spawns every so often, you don't end up with giant mobs of unconnected players racing to be the one to actually kill it.
The disadvantage is that you never meet anyone else inside.
~J
Demonseed Elite
Dec 20 2007, 07:19 PM
Dark Age of Camelot had plenty of non-instanced dungeons. Which isn't to say they were better than instanced dungeons, but it was certainly possible, hardware-wise and player-wise.
nezumi
Dec 20 2007, 07:29 PM
Huh. Learn something new.
If anything, I would say go with a pseudo-instanced dungeon - The computer doesn't render anything inside the Ares building if no one is in there (or maybe just the lobby or something). If anyone enters the 10th floor of the building, a floor is generated. If two people randomly enter the 10th floor, they both get the same random floor and can meet each other, however if one is on the 10th and the other on the eleventh, the floors are separate and don't really interact. If a job requires going to the 33rd level of said building, that level is generated before the mission. Anyone who goes to the 33rd floor then gets the same floor, with all its defenses, which in cases where multiple people are pursuing the same run they may run into each other, or you may get a run which has already been completed by someone else, leaving nothing for you to do. Since there are hundreds of buildings with hundreds of floors (none of which have to be especially huge), you can have quite a few instanced maps simultaneously, but people can jump from their instanced map to someone else's.
Or is that just random generation of non-instanced maps?
Under the current rules, matrix combat would almost necessarily have to be instanced maps. Astral combat would almost necessarily have to be non-instanced, with most buildings warded.
tete
Dec 20 2007, 07:30 PM
[QUOTE=Kagetenshi,Dec 20 2007, 06:45 PM] [QUOTE=nezumi,Dec 20 2007, 01:38 PM]
The disadvantage is that you never meet anyone else inside. [/QUOTE]
I would say thats an advantage when your doing a mission. The last thing I was to do is sit around in Renraku waiting for Deus to spawn.
Nightwalker450
Dec 20 2007, 07:41 PM
The idea of instanced is so your Johnson in effect only hires one team for the run. And likewise you're not hired for a run thats already been done. Waiting for spawns just sucks, likewise when you're hired to go after Ares you don't want to instead find another runner team camped out to stop other runner teams, unless...
Another idea that I forgot about till now, that had come up in my groups original discussion.
-Mixed Instances, PvP... The Factions of Lone Star or Doc Wagon, could end up doing the same instance as the runners. Lone Star's job is to stop the runners, or Doc Wagons job is to pull out the security guards (or maybe even a downed runner). Or as I started to say above, a runner team is sent in to prevent another runner team from succeeding.
Mr. Unpronounceable
Dec 20 2007, 07:43 PM
I'd really hate to see the mob-train in a non-instanced shadowrun.
Though there would have to be some non-instanced areas: the various malls, bars, streets, etc.
Anyway, my idea was for user-content. Each guild (or whatever they would call it) would get a (new non-canon) corporation whose facilities, defenses, area-of-expertise, etc. would be assembled piecemeal. Missions against that facility would be generated randomly by the server. Players would get to rate the design of the opposing guilds facility (but not their own, if sent against it) - getting enough points from that would, in some to-be-determined way, aid the guild who designed it, as well as promoting that corp up the unranked-A-AA-AAA ladder. Designers who do well enough would get access to the special toys - like bug spirits, shedim, cyberzombies, etc.
Individual runners would also move up the street->runner->prime runner ladder via sucessful runs.
Teams would have to be fairly limited in size relative to other MMORPGs, but you could possibly have an alpha and beta team going at the same time on semi-related tasks (for example: diversion vs. extraction.) You could hire NPCs to fill out your diversion team if necessary (Gilettes!)
Nightwalker450
Dec 20 2007, 07:54 PM
One thing that would be fun to watch is your mage astral projecting or likewise hacker in full VR. The group of runners standing guard over their limp body as they do their work... And suddenly the comotose person flatlines and they have no idea who or what took them out. Until backup arrives, or Spirits start materializing to tear them apart.
Some missions could be non-instanced, but those would be more like Brawl, or ganger missions. As a runner you'd probably turn down a job if it was high-profile and there were 5 teams doing the same exact thing you were doing. (Smokin Aces anyone?) Johnson's usually pay extra if there is or was another team attempting the job, because it increases the overall difficulty of said job.
nezumi
Dec 20 2007, 08:04 PM
I think you guys are sticking yourself too much to the WoW format.
If you get the players to design security layouts and preplan how the matrix and such interact, it's almost trivial to put a Box in a given safe room in a given map, spawn it up, and give the Johnson the job of "go to map X and get box Y". When the box is gone, the box is gone, that's it, no respawning. Things don't respawn in Shadowrun, so let's avoid using that tool unless we need to.
So let's say we have a server with 1,000 runners of different levels.
The game has 1,000 maps and for fun 50 PC Johnsons, as well as a number of NPC Johnsons.
The computer grabs say 400 of its maps and generates 400 different jobs. It places each map in a different part of a given building, so multiple maps can be in the same building. Inside of each map, the computer places one or more 'boxes'.
The computer then makes the 400 jobs available to Johnsons. The 50 PC Johnsons each get a choice of jobs first, although probably not all 400. They get jobs appropriate to their level, reputation and alliances. They have a chance to 'accept' the job, in which case they get a suitcase of cash to spend as they wish. If they succeed at the job, they keep whatever they don't spend. They can scout out the job before or after accepting it, hire other people to scout it out, etc. They hit the streets and start making calls, selling these jobs to people they know are also of approximately the correct level (the Runners!) The Johnson may be managing several runs at once, if he's up to it. The NPC runners begin releasing the jobs soon after, although at lower pay.
The runners now get these jobs. The jobs are presorted based on their general level of ability. They get the low-down from the Johnson, a chance to negotiate and so on. They can accept or not. It is possible two Johnsons sell the same job to different parties, or that the same Johnson sells the job to two different parties (although that could take out some of his cut, obviously).
Once enough people accept the job, the NPC Johnsons stop offering it and it comes off the table, leaving the untaken jobs and any new ones generated.
The runners scurry off to do their thing. Since they may or may not be competing against another team, time is of the essence (plus the Johnson may get itchy and cancel the contract if they take too long). Eventually they break in. If the other team got in first, there's no box, and security has been alerted.
When you break in, there are both responses appropriate to that map, plus guards and whatnot dispatched depending on the level. As they get hit, DocWagon may come in (optionally also run by PCs). DocWagon escorts killed PCs out of combat so they can wake up and get back to their lives, now a good deal poorer and with a hit to his rep.
When the job is done, characters get karma based on their survival and whether they completed the run, pay based on whatever the Johnson negotiated, and a boost to their rep based on how well they did. The Johnson keeps whatever he didn't spend, gets karma (although less than if he went on the run himself) and a boost to his rep. The Johnson rates the runners and the runners the Johnson, which makes for an additional reputation boost, representing word of mouth.
A Johnson who regularly hires teams that fail is going to piss off his teams even if he succeeds at his mission, resulting in damage to his rep, which means he doesn't get as good jobs to sell. A Johnson who is too stingy will suffer the same. Meanwhile, runners who are greedy will take a hit to their reps too for cutting into the Johnson's profit. Both sides can kill the other, but obviously that also decreases rep (a pretty major hit, I'd imagine). Middlemen would be a natural evolution in that world.
No respawning. No instances. No need for the devs to do huge amounts of work. As long as there are people who enjoy making maps (and we know there are!) the world generates itself.
DarusGrey
Dec 20 2007, 08:22 PM
I think if people want to make a basis of comparison, a Shadowrun MMO should draw more inspiration from UO than more modern MMOs.
UO was about player justice, lawless land, and controlling territory in it's early days, had no levels, no item curves, and was mainly player driven.
I think thats a lot more what people would want and expect from a Shadowrun game than compared to most modern MMOs.
Focusing on the setting should be the important starting point, and I'd also encourage staying away from the typical run atmosphere of assuming everyone is a shadowrunner, there should be game elements that allow people to be corporate workers, police officers, regular businessmen. Again drawing UO as an example, it was perfectly viable to play the game for years and never enter combat once, and thats something I love about RPGs in general that is sorely lacking since then, and should be a element of a shadowrun mmo.
Obviously shadowrunning is an important part of the setting, but I don't think it should be the focal point of a game like this. I think this should be a sandbox style MMO that allows the player to define what they are in relation to the setting.
Kagetenshi
Dec 20 2007, 08:36 PM
Nezumi's got the idea. Have enough locations, weight things to decrease (but not eliminate) the odds of two simultaneous runs on the same location, and don't explicitly reuse runs while keeping a large enough pool of elements to combine to make runs to make it unlikely that any given run will be duplicated at the same time.
~J
mfb
Dec 20 2007, 08:50 PM
Pirates of the Burning Sea has an interesting system where it basically spawns a story arc for your character, so that the missions (i don't think they're randomized, but the same concept could work on a randomized or semi-randomized mission scheme) are all loosely linked together for your character. the hostage you resuce in one of your early missions turns out to be your long-lost sister; the pirate raider you defeated to rescue her becomes a recurring enemy. stuff like that. the interesting thing is, these characters are not unique to you--your long-lost sister might be some other player's nemesis, and your nemesis might be some other player's long-lost brother.
similarly, if two simultaneous runs on the same location do occur, it'd be interesting to have the game actually build on it--spawn an NPC that's double-crossed both teams, maybe, or offer an alternative reward to teams that work out the conflict to their mutual benefit.
X-Kalibur
Dec 20 2007, 08:54 PM
I've said it before, I'll say it again, I just want a Shadowrun game that is a mix between Rainbow Six, Deus Ex, and maybe a touch of Morrowind/Oblivion but mixed with the Genesis/Megadrive Shadowrun.
Ed_209a
Dec 20 2007, 09:39 PM
My perfect Shadowrun MMO would start with small servers. I would LOVE to see servers sealed off after 100 characters. I don't like having TOO many heroes in the game. I really like City Of Heroes, but there are more superheroes than police on most servers! This would also let you eventually get to know most of the Runner community in your version of Seattle.
Let me start the game walking off the boat from <somewhere> with nothing but starting gear and the comcode for someone who "can get you what you need". I make a quick call to see what apartments are available, and hustle there before I get hassled by the Star or the local fauna.
Give me places to hang out IC. Let me get to know my fellow scumbags in a less stressful setting than a mission. I would like a Sims/2nd Life aspect to the game, if I want it.
I like how City of Heroes constructs their cities. The actual missions are instanced indoors, but you can also get attacked on the street on the way to the mission. Starting the mission with a moderate wound because of some gangers you met on the way would be an interesting complication.
Perhaps a 500x500m map for each neighborhood?
Program in the concealability rules for gear. Having too much weaponry can get you in trouble as often as not enough.
Make legwork useful. Maybe not a 24-hr stakeout of the site, but matrix searches and talking to contacts.
Every so often, maybe every 15 min, AI Johnsons will try to recruit pick-up teams for quick, run of the mill runs. The AI will have an objective, and a difficulty, and will then try to put together an appropriate team. The mission takes maybe 20-30min, with another 10-20 for legwork.
Once you get to the target, the play would be in the Rainbow 6/Splinter Cell type action.
The big missions will go to long-term teams. This is the kind of play we are familiar with in the RPG, and would be the equivalent of supergroups/guilds. The gameplay would encourage players to settle in with a group they work well with as soon as they can.
Death/Jail would be permanent. The reaper/Star shouldn't be too tough to evade, as long as you know when it's time to go. For example, if the Star sees you leaving a building, a stand-up fight is a certain way to lose a character. You will usually get away if you run for it immediately. Similarly, if you take a bad hit in combat, you may go down, but a buddy can drag you to cover and slap a bandage on you to keep you from death.
Rajaat99
Dec 20 2007, 10:39 PM
Oh, I have the best idea! Don't do it. Come on, let's face facts, it would suck. Sure some people would pick it up, but it would be a huge let down. They would have things that have never appeared in canon and they would leave so much out. Just look at the Shadowrun Xbox 360 game.
What would I like to see in a Shadowrun MMORPG? Nothing, I'd like it to never exist.
Stahlseele
Dec 20 2007, 10:50 PM
yes so?
lots of people would probably LOVE to be able to actually Play Shadowrun(not just a poorly made piece of shit game with the name stamped onto it) without needing to find a group of people and bring them in together on at least a weekend where they ALL happen to have enough time for doing a whole run . .
mfb
Dec 20 2007, 10:56 PM
that can be accomplished without making it an MMO. considering how difficult it apparently is to produce a good SR game, compounding that difficulty with the large problems inherent in producing a good MMO seems unwise.
Stahlseele
Dec 20 2007, 10:57 PM
sadly all of the stuff the guy of shadowrun online(now sixth world gaming) had planned/written up were taken down after micro shits cease and desist order . . there were some pretty good ideas in there . .
Kagetenshi
Dec 20 2007, 11:42 PM
Did SRO actually produce anything worthwhile? I kept tabs on them until such time as it seemed to me obvious that it wasn't worth my time.
~J
Stahlseele
Dec 20 2007, 11:46 PM
they had a playable pre alpha if i remember correctly . . of course not even closed beta, only who had to got to see/try it . .
Kagetenshi
Dec 21 2007, 01:54 AM
Well, that's a matter of definitions. I mean, I've got a "playable pre-alpha" of a Shadowrun game if one is sufficiently generous…
~J
hyzmarca
Dec 21 2007, 02:02 AM
One thing that could be done is use player involvement to reduce development workload. Allow some players or groups of players to work their way up, own small to medium businesses, build facilities, and contract shadowruns against each other. Including a limited set of design tools can greatly expand the game without putting a an absurd workload on the paid developers.
Fortune
Dec 21 2007, 02:03 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
I kept tabs on them until such time as it seemed to me obvious that it wasn't worth my time. |
That was pretty much my feelings on SRO as well.
Sir_Psycho
Dec 21 2007, 09:25 AM
The biggest problem with a Shadowrun MMO is the second M. It's multiplayer. People will ruin it. Roleplaying and immersion are thrown out and grubbing for experience and loot and the need to be an anonymous dickhead to random people. This is what it would do to the role-playing game we enjoy:
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz?
Mohawk_Blade: OMG Shutup stop spaming noob! every1 has ruthenium gank! R U Retarded?
BLOOD_ELF69[Troll_Killaz_Klan]:: U R Noob! my clan wil KIL U, dickhed!
Mohawk_Blade: Lol I have wired reflexes 2 u loser Il rape u and ur shit clan, my sammy has DIKOTE, noob.
Hence the only Shadowrun game I could accept would be a non-linear FPS style RPG. Shadowrunning in a large sandbox style cyber-punk city. Runs and etc. would be a combination of one or two major story arcs, side-missions and randomly generated (mark a citizen for wetwork and get to it, bypass his security systems, incapacitate the guards and ice the target). A lot of the downtime between runs would involve traversing the city, avoiding the heat, hanging out in bars, cultivating contacts, fencing gear, breaking into random houses and such. It'd be much more like the Shadowrun that we play, although a lot of stuff on the edges of the game would have to be removed, eg. ship-to-ship combat, indirect fire, etc. Hopefully most of the conversation would be text based because voice-acting takes too much effort to comprehensively express a complex world (Compare Morrowind and Oblivion). It could be quite fun, I suppose. Wired Reflexes allowing you to use a Max Payne style Bullet-Time reflex trigger. Astral projection (with a load of crazy graphical filters and creatively designed spirits). The Matrix would probably the most interesting part, if done creatively. Wierd "gravity" and visual metaphors, running about on the ceiling, dying icons derezzing into static and blowing away, tron-esque neon pathways and such.
Anyway, I'm rambling again. What's good about shadowrun is the atmosphere and the immersion. This is about as possible in a MMO as it is in a pig-pen.
Critias
Dec 21 2007, 12:29 PM
The FPS-style came can still have some RPG elements to it. The Vampire: Bloodlines game would be an example. You move around like it's a first (or third, your choice) person shooter, with the standard FPS button layout for "fire a gun" or "slash with a sword" but your effectiveness with those attacks varies based on your skills and attributes. Hell, even the Ghost Recon games had it (not the 360 ones, but the older ones) to an extent with characters getting better at shooting, leadership, etc over time.
So an FPS feel and an RPG aren't completely incompatible, in theory at least.
QUOTE (mfb @ Dec 20 2007, 03:50 PM) |
...the hostage you resuce in one of your early missions turns out to be your long-lost sister... |
Cockblock, Skywalker style!
Sir_Psycho
Dec 21 2007, 12:35 PM
Well that's what I meant by FPS style RPG. The Elder Scrolls, Vamp: Masquerade, Deus Ex (is the biggie), STALKER etc.
Kalvan
Dec 21 2007, 03:44 PM
QUOTE (Sir_Psycho) |
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? Mohawk_Blade: OMG Shutup stop spaming noob! every1 has ruthenium gank! R U Retarded? BLOOD_ELF69[Troll_Killaz_Klan]:: U R Noob! my clan wil KIL U, dickhed! Mohawk_Blade: Lol I have wired reflexes 2 u loser Il rape u and ur shit clan, my sammy has DIKOTE, noob.
Anyway, I'm rambling again. What's good about shadowrun is the atmosphere and the immersion. This is about as possible in a MMO as it is in a pig-pen. |
Doesn't anyone see how truly in character that exchange sounds? Okay, l33tsp3@k will be a tad dated in 50 years (or whenever it's set), and these folks sound more like recently graduated gangers than long time runners (the kind Mr. Johnson might want to use as decoys rather than for the "real goal,") but I would say Sir Psycho just now gave the most in character exchange I've seen outside of officially published material.

Seriously, folks. I think that while a Shadowrun MMO would be wonderful in principle, there are going to be a few problems:
1.: Scope Even if we just use Seattle, it stretches from Southern Puyallup all the way to Everett (80 miles ({ca. 130 Kilometers}), and from the Downtown Waterfront to the wall keeping Redmond from spilling into Salish-Sidhe (at least 35 miles {ca. 48 Kilometers}). That's a lot of streets to lay out and buildings to build even if only on the outside. Then there's the Tubes, the Ork Underground, the Big Garage, the Waterfronts at Tacoma and bellevue....
2.: NPCs and PCs. We need more than just runners. We need fixers, Johnsons, talisleggers, fences of all kinds, gangs in the slums, syndicates, Lone Star, Company Men and Women (like Corporate Security), initiatory groups, policlubs, "charities," and even honest small businesses to launder money with and runners to hide behind.
3.: There will need to be at least some times when buildings will not be instanced, or at least not completely. For example, if multiple teams are hired, but at least some teams are decoys. Or when teams are sent after the same thing, or one team picked up something another team needs and doesn't know it...
Moon-Hawk
Dec 21 2007, 05:02 PM
QUOTE (Sir_Psycho) |
The biggest problem with a Shadowrun MMO is the second M. It's multiplayer. People will ruin it. |
I think it's the first M. If it were a team-based FPS/RPG where you and up to three friends could try to complete the missions, that would be fine. It's when you add 10,000 other people you didn't personally invite that you get your hilarious example.
Multiplayer campaign in Halo or Gears is great, if you could take good FPS action like that and string it together with RPG elements and a real plot, it would be phenomenal. A difficulty setting (like in every other FPS, only with a wider range) could adjust for having anything from 1 to 4 people playing though the campaign.
You could make yourself a generalist and play by yourself on Easy, and you'd probably be forced to solve a lot of problems the hard way, 'cause you're a generalist, but that's okay because you're playing on Easy. Get yourself three friends and you can all make specialist characters who really kick ass and you can turn the difficulty from "easy" up to "Arcology."

I think that would be fun.
Kagetenshi
Dec 21 2007, 05:04 PM
It would also mean you could be a lot more flexible, because you wouldn't have to worry about barring cheating—provided that you give an obvious way to play a "fair" game, anything the players do to make themselves overpowered is their own lookout.
~J
nezumi
Dec 21 2007, 06:44 PM
QUOTE (Kalvan) |
1.: Scope Even if we just use Seattle, it stretches from Southern Puyallup all the way to Everett (80 miles ({ca. 130 Kilometers}),... |
Then expand slowly. Build the barrens first. That's pretty easy anyway. If any part of Seattle draws on the current WoW paradigm it's Puyallup. As your player base grows, expand. WoW does that now, no reason 'we' couldn't. It's even more the case if you allow the players themselves to design new things. The first players will get more lucrative pay in order to keep up with the curve of expanding the world for the following players. That's an instant incentive to be an early adopter, which is a plus.
QUOTE |
2.: NPCs and PCs. We need more than just runners. We need fixers, Johnsons, talisleggers, fences of all kinds, gangs in the slums, syndicates, Lone Star, Company Men and Women (like Corporate Security), initiatory groups, policlubs, "charities," and even honest small businesses to launder money with and runners to hide behind. |
And many people have suggested that.
You would have a bunch of NPCs who are basically monsters or standard fixers. That's pretty standard as MMRPGs go. So if you run into a part of the barrens, a bunch of gangers jump out and they're not interested in talking (or maybe they are, but only for money).
You'd also have 'color' NPCs - bums getting warm by the fire, people walking between buildings, whatever. Pretty straightforward and boring.
Corporate security and Lone Star would be generated specifically in response to particular actions. You break into a building, after a set number of minutes they span. They're reactive NPCs.
But then you get into all the diverse PC jobs that could also be taken by NPCs if necessary. Drug dealers, pimps, street docs, Johnsons, fixers, weapons dealers, mafiosas, security people, hitmen, doc wagon and yes, possibly even runners if we have enough people. NPCs CAN play these roles, but there isn't much reason for them to if we can make it fun and profitable for players to. And the natural market forces will make it such that people will naturally seek whatever jobs are generally unoccupied. If people don't like to make drugs, the price of drugs will rise until people do it just for the money (just like real life!) and some people will learn how to do it well enough to drive the NPCs out of business.
QUOTE |
3.: There will need to be at least some times when buildings will not be instanced, or at least not completely. For example, if multiple teams are hired, but at least some teams are decoys. Or when teams are sent after the same thing, or one team picked up something another team needs and doesn't know it... |
I already gave my opinion on this. Generally speaking buildings shouldn't be 'instanced' and people should be able to interfere with one another. However the maps don't need to be static either.
Mr. Unpronounceable
Dec 21 2007, 06:55 PM
QUOTE (Sir_Psycho) |
BLOOD_ELF69 [Troll_Killaz_Klan]: Any1 trade 4 Ruthenum? I need 8 Polymer 4 gank suit plz. Need 4 Arcology instance. Any1 trade plz? |
(snip)
We should be so lucky - like every single other MMO out there the names would be some variant of Wheel of Time, Lord of the Rings, or Final Fantasy characters, or, more likely, Drizt.
mfb
Dec 21 2007, 07:01 PM
one thing i'll say that an SR MMO would have going for it--names like that would be perfectly realistic. runners aren't necessarily the most well-read group; i'm sure there'd be lots of them who'd think it the height of cleverness to name themselves after a character in some 100-year-old book.
ShadowDragon8685
Dec 21 2007, 10:29 PM
I think it's not the names so much as the spamming and the use of numbers in place of letters. Mainly the fact that you have this schmuck standing outside of a black market auction house begging for something.
This could be solved, I think, by making the 'Star show up for you if you spam or make yourself a menace. Make it self-enforcable.
IE, say this schmuck is making a nuisance of them. I can buy a disposable cellular comm at Stuffer shack, call and report him for something (murder or something), and dispose of the phone. Sooner or later the Star will show up - sooner, the more reports they get for one person.
And in the Barrens, well... I can just put my gun to his head and tell him to shut up and hand me everything he owns, or I'll shoot him and take it myself.
Ravor
Dec 21 2007, 11:30 PM
Personally I'd like to see a MMORPG that actually offically supported stand-alone servers and had decent AI 'bots' included.
Death would have to be very, very harsh, but Fourth Edition gives us a work-around, burn Edge or your character is trash.
Total PvP would be a must, but combine it with realistic enforcement, gangs making everyone they see their bitches if they don't cough up protection money is doable, but watch out what you carry in the good side of the 'plex.
Oh, and no name restrictions per-say, the only reason there aren't a million Runners calling themselves Fastjack is that Fastjack has his own ways to handle the problem, naming conventions should be policed by the community ... the flip side is that there isn't anything to keep a Runner from changing his streetname every couple of days other then possibly losing some of his contacts.
However, I agree with the sentiment that if a Shadowrun MMORPG was ever done "right" it would be a huge failure because most people wouldn't want to deal with the grit and darkness that is necessary to stay true to the source...
Blade
Dec 22 2007, 09:39 PM
I've done some thinking about MMORPG's in general, and also about a SR MMORPG and I've come up with a few ideas that I like but wouldn't comercially work. Actually, most of the ideas could also apply to single player games.
To sum up :
Single player-compatible part:
1) You have a world. Most games already have this.
2) You have NPCs, but they aren't your average scripted NPCs (except maybe for some wild creatures or minor NPCs. They are individuals. They have a story and they have a motivation. Instead of doing scripted things, they just try to reach their goals. They gather information and try to find the best way to reach their goals according to this information, their abilities and their personality.
3) NPCs can have an impact on the world: if a NPC wants to build a house, he'll build it.
MMO elements :
4) Your character isn't a race/class/skill combo. It's not a bunch of numbers and one of the 5^8 possible look. The character creation requires you to answer a lot of questions (each with a lot of different possibilities) about your character past. This serves three purposes. First, it generates the character's stats. Secondly, it forces the player to see his character as more than just a bunch of stats. Third, it generates a backstory that'll be used inside the game. If, according to your answers, your character's sister has been recently killed by a gang, the game will include this story. It can use events that happened previously (for example if a female NPC has been killed recently by a ganger, the game can decide that this female NPC was the sister), or add it to the world. This way, you won't have the same quest as everyone, but it'll be much more personal.
5) You also have to answer question about your gaming habits and your overall goal in the game. This helps tailor your story and events to you. For example if you don't have a lot of time to spend on the game, your story won't be too long, to allow you to complete it one day. Also, if you mostly play on sunday afternoon, the game will try to pair you up with other players playing in the same time-frame. For example it can lead another player playing on sunday afternoon to have a grudge against the gang that killed your sister, so that you can team up with him.
6) Because of these players/players, players/world and NPC/world interactions, the world will be constantly changing according to the individual story of all players. This also means that your character will probably have experiences that'll give him new motivations after having finished his initial storyline.
These are the main ideas. I've also got some opinions about other aspects (how to handle death, how to handle character progression and so on, what perspective to use) but they aren't as important.
Lindt
Dec 23 2007, 02:03 AM
QUOTE (Ravor) |
Total PvP would be a must, but combine it with realistic enforcement, gangs making everyone they see their bitches if they don't cough up protection money is doable, but watch out what you carry in the good side of the 'plex.. |
Untill the highest level players (who are 15 and have nothing else better to do) start demanding protection money from all the new players.
Id be laughing my ass off right up until I canceled my recurring subscription.
FrankTrollman
Dec 23 2007, 11:02 AM
I would love to see a GTA:Online with a Shadowrun theme. And I would actually like to see the "Mob Trains" generated by characters who racked up a big police attention. It would need a more comprehensive rubric than the one in GTA (get 4 stars and police teleport to your area) with response times and physical locations, but I think it would be very doable.
This being an online game, there would basically always be a full-scale riot response somewhere in the city, which is extremely atmospheric. Also it makes decoy runs where you pull out heavy weapons and spray bullets at downtown store fronts and then start booking it all the more practical.
The Commlink signal ranges actually act as a great in-game filter. You can send Matrix communications to anyone who has sent you their access code (your friends and teammates basically), but you can only broadcast to people within your signal range. So if someone is hawking oxygenated fluorocarbons or something, you automatically ignore them if you're on an archology run. And yeah, if you wander around the Barrens, you'll pass all kinds of AR icons of people trying to get you to purchase severed hands or drugs - which is perfect.
You'd want to have multiple servers in order to keep the game world from filling up with too much crazy. But the basic dynamic of running around in dive bars "looking 4 group" is fine.
-Frank
Ravor
Dec 24 2007, 07:56 AM
*shrugs* Lindt, given the lethal nature of Shadowrun and the fact that there hard caps built into Fourth Edition (Which I assume any MMORPG would be based off of if we are trying to remain true to the source.) means that no matter how much Karma you have you can still be ganked provided that the AI is smart enough to react realistically to the characters to prevent everyone from walking around with Pather Canons and Mil-Spec Armor.
Lindt
Dec 24 2007, 08:49 AM
Well, there really arnt hard caps built in. Mages can just keep right on initiating and being able to cast bigger and badder spells. Correctly built you could have a cybered to the gills Sammy who's also can cast spells.
Besides, because it IS such a lethal system, you dont need a Assault Cannon. Just a heavy pistol and move by wire. Or be an adept. Yay for tossing 18 dice.
Its got some intrinsic issues. But I also throw up a little at the mention of an SR MMO.
Stahlseele
Dec 24 2007, 09:19 AM
in 4th there's both hard caps for skill and attributes . . but of course things like smartlink and vision magnification and stuff still add more dice to that . . whoever thought that trolls for example were rolling too many dice when doing damage resistance tests seems not to have done his homework when they decided on the SR4 mechanics *g*
Zak
Dec 24 2007, 01:12 PM
Well, PvP. Bring it on. No neutral zones and shit like that. All out fragfest.
But since that would be too much grief, there will be neutral zones and boring stuff like that. Or only faction versus faction PvP. And for some reason they cant talk to each other
A MMO for SR is just not going to work on a roleplaying level. Either you toss out the dangerous side of the game with removing PvP and only have attackable and attacing 'mobs' outside savezones, or you toss out any playablility by going all out massacre style where the whole server will be killed by retards who think its fun.
All its going to be is collecting cash and gear while trying to be faster than other players. Just like any other MMO.