Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Mental Exercise: Anti-Dragon Task Force
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
Fortune
I never said watching TV was the only source of information. Humans go to school to learn warfare. They write books on tactics and strategy. These (and I'm sure many other resources) are all available for use as a learning aid.

My point is that there is an awful lot of handwaving in regard to coordination. There are a lot of assumptions being made, and as with every other thread of this kind, it will eventually degenerate into 'Army wins!', 'Does not!', 'Does too!' without a solid scenario adjudicated by a impartial referee.
Cthulhudreams
I'm not sure why a DNI doesn't allow you to rip the knowledge of a mage right out of his brain, especially with his consent. This would make it easy to identify the dragons position.

IN other news, no, watching it on the TV won't tell you. But there are plenty of ex military strategic, operational and tactical personnel who will, for money, provide consulting services on exactly that sort of thing. There are even more of them in shadowrun verse. I'll give you a clue. They are called mercenaries.

mfb
QUOTE (Frank Trollman)
Mana Static can't be hidden in. It's a completely invalid tactic. If you're in the Mana Static they can still see you because it doesn't block line of sight.

but it does affect astral visibility. and if visibility on the astral is bad enough, spotting things on the astral stops being automatic. you can spot a person in an orange jumpsuit automatically, unless it's dark and foggy out.
Angelone
You all seem to be forgetting about air defense assests. PATRIOT, if you want, can detect a softball size object a few hundred miles away. The missles travel faster than a dragon ever dreamed about. I'm not even going to get into THAAD or any of the other crazy stuff they are coming out with. Sure the dragon can use concealment but you also have shorter range air defense which can feed info to other units. Even them just sending up the astral sightings you can still hit the dragon no problem.

Shoot, I think Puff the Magic Dragon here and here would take out a GD. Not to mention the newer AC-130 shown here.
mfb
i'm not sure i see how shorter-range sensors would work better than longer-range sensors against magical concealment.
Angelone
Not sensors the actual people on the ground as it were. Shorad (stinger) is mostly aim by eye so they can say "Hey, it's by (insert landmark or cordinates here) hit it." and the longer range air defense can. They could also patch the astral perciever's targetting to us and we could work with that.
mfb
Concealment works against eyes, too. not to mention invisibility spells. as for astral perception, there's some debate on what measures the dragon could take against that, and how well such measures would work.
Guardian
QUOTE (Fuchs)
Without rehashing the discussion from another thread, this thread is about how a government or megacorp force could kill a rampaging Great Dragon.


Essayons. In a word, VBIED.

If my math is right, overcoming the magic, edge, dodge, soak, and condition monitor of a great western dragon would take a 107 damage explosion, or about 234 kg of rating 6 foam explosives by a novice bomber. Pack it into a rigged Honda Spirit and teach the lizard that it's the 6th world now, and humanity isn't going to put up with this 4th world hissy-fit.
KCKitsune
QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Feb 13 2008, 06:11 PM) *
Everyone. Nuclear weapons can be delivered McVeigh style no matter what kind of crazy airplanes, missile shields, or geodesic domes you think you have. As long as there are nuclear submarines, shipping containers, and fucking czar bombs, you can't really defend your cities from a hostile major power.


OK, Frank, who other than the Russians and the US have nuclear subs. As for shipping in Nukes... face facts, this is NOT the Shadowrun universe. An operation of the scale needed to SERIOUSLY hurt the US, Russia, or China would be found out. You can NOT hide that many people with those kinds of weapons.

QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Feb 13 2008, 06:11 PM) *
A ballistic missile shield is a hoax, but a convincing enough one that it might convince a sufficiently stupid Chief Executive on one side or another to start a nuclear war. And that would be an extinction event. A ballistic missile shield is a danger to the planet. Even if it works. Especially if it works.


OK, I'll bite, how does a FUNCTIONAL missile intercept system cause the world to get CLOSER to nuclear war rather than further away?
krakjen
QUOTE (Angelone @ Feb 14 2008, 02:29 AM) *
Shoot, I think Puff the Magic Dragon here and here would take out a GD. Not to mention the newer AC-130 shown here.

While Spooky/Spectre have impressive firepower, they are made to attack ground target, not flying heavily armored magic platform.
You'd better look into anti-aerial suport...

QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Feb 14 2008, 05:40 AM) *
OK, I'll bite, how does a FUNCTIONAL missile intercept system cause the world to get CLOSER to nuclear war rather than further away?

Easy. If you have a way to effectively counter nuclear weapons, there is no longer fear of reciprocity/MAD.
The military are no longer afraid to use it just like a standard, way more powerful (read efficient) bomb.
And then you don't need much to make it happen...

(well you still need two nuclear-powered superpowers hating their guts and that didn't happen since Cold War, but hey the shadowrun world is kinda messed up and they most likely must be more country having access to mushroom toys than now. Think batshit crazy aztechnology and stuffs...)
kzt
QUOTE (Feshy @ Feb 13 2008, 12:10 PM) *
Probably atmospheric attenuation is the reason "why not" -- the same reason we don' t have such things currently.

No, it's because it is extremely hard and expensive. Same reason why, after 50 years of work, we are still "a few years" from a fusion reactor, like we were in 1965. However there has been a lot more effective progress done in creating working laser weapons than in creating working fusion reactors.
krakjen
And nice shiny railguns start popping on battleships
KCKitsune
QUOTE (krakjen @ Feb 14 2008, 12:48 AM) *
While Spooky/Spectre have impressive firepower, they are made to attack ground target, not flying heavily armored magic platform.
You'd better look into anti-aerial suport...


actually, the only gun on a AC-130 that might hurt a GD is the 105 mm. The 25 mm gats would sting (I think they would translate as the GE Vanquisher Heavy Autocannon in SR), but would not be a threat.

QUOTE (krakjen @ Feb 14 2008, 12:48 AM) *
Easy. If you have a way to effectively counter nuclear weapons, there is no longer fear of reciprocity/MAD.
The military are no longer afraid to use it just like a standard, way more powerful (read efficient) bomb.
And then you don't need much to make it happen...


Except you still have to deal with the fallout (radiation and political/social) from using those types of weapons. I think that a nuke would still only be last resort weapon (they are expensive you know).
FrankTrollman
QUOTE (mfb @ Feb 13 2008, 09:06 PM) *
Concealment works against eyes, too. not to mention invisibility spells. as for astral perception, there's some debate on what measures the dragon could take against that, and how well such measures would work.


Dude, the Astral Perception threshold to spot this fucker is negative six. He is literally off the charts on the visibility spectrum. Even a critical glitch wouldn't stop you from knowing exactly where he is.

The Great Dragon cannot hide from an astrally perceiving magician sitting in the window seat of a Banshee. Not "it would be difficult for him to obscure himself" - it simply cannot be done. There is no conceivable dice pool penalty or distraction which could possibly stop an astral observer from knowing exactly where he is.

-Frank
Oracle
QUOTE (KCKitsune @ Feb 14 2008, 07:58 AM) *
I think that a nuke would still only be last resort weapon (they are expensive you know).


So is war in general. And so what?
KCKitsune
QUOTE (Oracle @ Feb 14 2008, 05:35 AM) *
So is war in general. And so what?


If a 5,000 nuyen.gif bomb will work just as well as a 5,000,000 nuyen.gif bomb... which one would you use?
cryptoknight
QUOTE (krakjen @ Feb 13 2008, 07:30 PM) *
Ho indeed, I forgot about the scaled-down crowbar.
But then again, a smaller projectile need to be even more precise, it still takes a few minutes from deorbiting to impact and your target is a Great Dragon which, as big as it seems to a human scale, is still a damn small flying target from orbital position, with invisibilitu and concealment, and would have to stay completely still to be efficiently hit.
Now, how are we gonna immobilize a Great Dragon ?


No need. The deorbiting Crowbars are not meteors, they have guidance fins. Either shoot the bullets with RFID tags in them and have them home in that way or use a laser/ultrasonic/screwywatsis designator of your choice and have them home in on that.
krakjen
QUOTE (cryptoknight @ Feb 14 2008, 04:22 PM) *
No need. The deorbiting Crowbars are not meteors, they have guidance fins. Either shoot the bullets with RFID tags in them and have them home in that way or use a laser/ultrasonic/screwywatsis designator of your choice and have them home in on that.

And you think something moving at orbital velocity is really maneuverable? We are talking 9 km/s here.
The fins are designed for stabilizing purpose and maybe some minor flight corrections, not aiming a moving target.
Not even considering the fact that the atmosphere reentry makes the sensors blind...
Odsh
QUOTE (Fuchs @ Feb 12 2008, 02:58 PM) *
concealment does not work on the astral


Are you sure about that?
cryptoknight
QUOTE (krakjen @ Feb 14 2008, 11:35 AM) *
And you think something moving at orbital velocity is really maneuverable? We are talking 9 km/s here.
The fins are designed for stabilizing purpose and maybe some minor flight corrections, not aiming a moving target.
Not even considering the fact that the atmosphere reentry makes the sensors blind...


The crowbar sized Thor weapons platform was designed as an Anti-armor weapon. Main Battle Tanks today can exceed 60 mph. They are definately able to do some mid flight correction. FWIW, if the dragon is flying around I doubt he's flying at 9km/s either.
Fuchs
QUOTE (Odsh @ Feb 14 2008, 04:48 PM) *
Are you sure about that?


Concealment (p. 287 SR4) is a physical (P) power. p. 286, sr4: "Physical powers cannot be used in astral space, or affect astral forms".
Slymoon
QUOTE (cryptoknight @ Feb 14 2008, 09:55 AM) *
The crowbar sized Thor weapons platform was designed as an Anti-armor weapon. Main Battle Tanks today can exceed 60 mph. They are definately able to do some mid flight correction. FWIW, if the dragon is flying around I doubt he's flying at 9km/s either.



I somehow doubt the Thor weapon platform is designed to target moving armor, though Abrams can and do fire on the move. In likelyhood if firing at a moving armor group will require calculation as to firing where they will be with small corrections in flight not where they are with large corrects to try and follow their movements.

And a swooping twirling dragon would likely not be a predictable target to track.
KCKitsune
Thors would not be used because if they miss they would cause more disruption than the dragon could create. Those mobile railguns on Thunderbirds are what you need. Since we don't know about any orbital energy cannons (and don't have stats for them), we have to go with the next best thing.
mfb
QUOTE (FrankTrollman)
Dude, the Astral Perception threshold to spot this fucker is negative six. He is literally off the charts on the visibility spectrum. Even a critical glitch wouldn't stop you from knowing exactly where he is.

The Great Dragon cannot hide from an astrally perceiving magician sitting in the window seat of a Banshee. Not "it would be difficult for him to obscure himself" - it simply cannot be done. There is no conceivable dice pool penalty or distraction which could possibly stop an astral observer from knowing exactly where he is.

due to his size? i'm not familiar with astral perception threshold modifiers.

even without mana static, i still think that the dragon could use proper terrain (urban, jungle, extremely mountainous, maybe even open ocean, especially in the tropics) to break up the spotters' ability to keep track of his location. he doesn't have to get out of sight for more than a few seconds at a time--as long as he also only remains in sight for similarly short periods--in order to keep them from providing usable targeting data.

i'm also trying really hard not to pitch a hissy fit about SR's handling of extremely long-range shots. ten seconds... -3 dice... anger rising...
cryptoknight
QUOTE (Slymoon @ Feb 14 2008, 12:48 PM) *
I somehow doubt the Thor weapon platform is designed to target moving armor, though Abrams can and do fire on the move. In likelyhood if firing at a moving armor group will require calculation as to firing where they will be with small corrections in flight not where they are with large corrects to try and follow their movements.

And a swooping twirling dragon would likely not be a predictable target to track.



Why not? Thor has seakers in the crowbars. Think of them as equivalent to the laser guided concrete bombs (http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1999/10/991007-iraq.htm) ... no they won't turn corners... but I did mention deorbiting about 1000 of them... yah raining steel crowbars is going to suck, but so is letting the dragon rampage around.
Jaid
there are no official orbital laser platform stats, but we do have lasers for ships that have a maximum range of 200,000 m (or 200 km). that should be sufficient for (very?) low orbit, shouldn't it?
Angelone
That's the big problem with threads like this. As we have a fairly good idea of what dragons can do, but almost none about what a military can.
Adarael
You know, that's a hilarious yet true reply.
mfb
QUOTE (cryptoknight)
Why not? Thor has seakers in the crowbars. Think of them as equivalent to the laser guided concrete bombs (http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1999/10/991007-iraq.htm) ... no they won't turn corners... but I did mention deorbiting about 1000 of them... yah raining steel crowbars is going to suck, but so is letting the dragon rampage around.

i believe that Thor shots may be significantly larger than you're imagining. certainly their destructive potential is a lot greater than what you're describing--a single shot was enough to completely obliterate a dug-in underground bunker complex, in System Failure. it seems to be a step below nukes, but a large step above conventional explosives. each one is quite a bit larger than a crowbar, and if you dropped a thousand of them in a given area, 999 of them would be overkill.

QUOTE (Angelone)
That's the big problem with threads like this. As we have a fairly good idea of what dragons can do, but almost none about what a military can.

haha, that is so damn true.
KCKitsune
QUOTE (Jaid @ Feb 14 2008, 05:59 PM) *
there are no official orbital laser platform stats, but we do have lasers for ships that have a maximum range of 200,000 m (or 200 km). that should be sufficient for (very?) low orbit, shouldn't it?


except the orbital laser would have more power as you don't need to supply power for propulsion. Also, the atmosphere ends right at about 96 km. So you're shooting through 37,504 km of vacuum and then 96 km of atmosphere. I think that those laser cannons would do wonders... and eat a dragon for lunch. grinbig.gif
mfb
i'm not sure they'd necessarily have more power. a ship-mounted laser, on a big enough ship, can draw on the ship's nuclear power plant. that's not the kind of thing that's going to end up on a satellite, simply because the satellite is going to need to be relatively maneuverable in order to be effective--it's going to have to change its orbit if it's going to have global reach. shifting that much mass that far that frequently... i wouldn't call that cost-effective. and definitely hard to hide. solar power won't provide quite as much juice, but it'll be a lot easier to move quickly, and it won't be constantly putting out the heat of a thousand suns.

i know that no price is too much if the right executive wants a big enough epeen, and i know that anything can be hidden, i just don't think it's likely that the right combination of epeen-lacking and money have yet come together in SR that a full-sized nuclear power plant will hae been lifted into space to power an orbital laser.
Adarael
My guess is that you could probably mount one of them lasers on a satellite and you'd rely on high-power capacitors, and just end up with a very limited shot-per-time ratio. I think there was a lot of discussion about this in Greg Bear's "EON", but I'm not sure I'm remembering it right. So you might end up with the same "30P -10AP" or whatever that you would from a big-ass ship laser, but you'd have a shot limitation of "one every 48 hours."

At least that's how I understand the discussion was going during the latter days of SDI's kill sats.
kzt
No, you take a 4 GW SPS that's a KM wide and mount the laser on that. Or a maser. Either way, it's kind of dead. IIRC, you could produce a 10 meter wide spot that would apply something on the order of 2.5 Kj per cm^2. That will raise the temp of a cm thick steel plate by about 750C per second. You essentially have an oxy-acetylene cutting torch applied to its entire body.
FrankTrollman
QUOTE (mfb)
i'm also trying really hard not to pitch a hissy fit about SR's handling of extremely long-range shots. ten seconds... -3 dice...


Well relax then, we are talking about Coil Guns, Lasers, and Masers here. These weapons cover 10 kilometers in less than half a second, and less than a hundredth of a second respectively. It takes less time for a laser to cross a 10 kilometer gulf than it takes a bullet to cross the room, so if anything you should be offended that the Dragon still gets a defense pool despite the fact that the attackers are little dots on the horizon and the incoming attacks are traveling literally faster than the eye can see.

Even the comparatively slow round from the coil gun is traveling faster than the electric impulses in the retina could deliver that information to the brain, let alone the amount of time that it would take to make a decision or take an action.

The military wins here, and this despite the fact that the game rules repeatedly fall against the military in the realism vs. playability question.

-Frank
mfb
i'm talking specifically about the gauss cannon, actually. ten seconds is actually a bit slow for a weapon powerd by sci-fitonium; i'll go with five seconds, maybe even three. with that long a flight time, you don't need to know that the projectile is coming. i find it highly unlikely that a dragon who's been recently attacked by masers is going to remain stationary, or even fly in a straight line, for three seconds.

i agree that the military wins if a) they get the jump on the dragon, or b) the dragon stays and fights for more than a few minutes, with the second conditional being heavily impacted by the type of terrain the fight takes place on.
cryptoknight
QUOTE (mfb @ Feb 14 2008, 07:33 PM) *
i believe that Thor shots may be significantly larger than you're imagining. certainly their destructive potential is a lot greater than what you're describing--a single shot was enough to completely obliterate a dug-in underground bunker complex, in System Failure. it seems to be a step below nukes, but a large step above conventional explosives. each one is quite a bit larger than a crowbar, and if you dropped a thousand of them in a given area, 999 of them would be overkill.


Thors shots scale from 3 foot long, crowbard diameter javelins for anti-armor to the orbiting telephone poles you're thinking of. I don't envision shooting a dragon with a telephone pole.
martindv
Why don't you believe in the orbital laser? Between solar-collector mircrowave transmission satellites, existing fission reactors for satellites, and Shadowrun having fusion reactors I can't believe that it's somehow cost-prohibitive.
Moon-Hawk
This makes me think of The Hammer of Dawn, from Gears of War.
Fortune
QUOTE (cryptoknight @ Feb 16 2008, 04:05 AM) *
Thors shots scale from 3 foot long, crowbard diameter javelins for anti-armor to the orbiting telephone poles you're thinking of.

Do you have a specific page reference for that?
Jaid
the orbital laser would actually have quite a bit of power. the standard laser from arsenal has 1,000 power built-in and expends 25 per shot (takes 6 combat turns to recharge 1 power from a vehicle iirc). if the orbital laser hasn't taken out the dragon by the time it runs out, it's not likely going to do it ever wink.gif

also, i would argue that coming from 200 km away, at the speed of light, the dragon shouldn't get any sort of active defense on the first shot. even on subsequent shots, it's gonna be hard to do much of anything defensively imo... it can't really see where the blast is coming from, when it's going to come, or anything like that.
Adarael
I believe technically that would be a mid-combat surprise test from an unseen attacker.
Or at least that's how I'd roll with it. Cuz it's awful hard to dodge an attack if you don't know it's coming or where it's coming from, even if you're already in a fight.
FrankTrollman
Hey, the LAVs that the coil guns are mounted on take 3 seconds to cover 8 kilometers, I'm sure the electrically accelerated sabots are traveling a bit faster than that.

-Frank
mfb
what? no they don't. the fastest LAV in the book, the Banshee, has a 'top' speed of 1 klick every three seconds. am i missing something that will allow an LAV to travel twenty-four times faster than that? for that matter, Arsenal's fast fighter-bomber only tops out at 1200 mpt.
kzt
Movement power.
mfb
ahhh, right. i knew i was missing something.

still, the fact that magic is involved doesn't really convince me that railguns are more than four times as badass in SR as in RL, especially since gauss cannon didn't exist as a marketable technology until 2065 at the earliest.
Kanada Ten
I take the budget that they would have used on the dragon killing squad, invest it in a bank, and bribe the dragon to stop attacking the city with a min/maxed social adept and nine accountants for the group pool bonus.
mfb
Kanada Ten wins, flawless victoly.
martindv
QUOTE (mfb @ Feb 16 2008, 12:38 AM) *
ahhh, right. i knew i was missing something.

how were you to know Frank expected you to read his mind and infer that he meant "when you add Movement"?

What if you just hired another great dragon?
kzt
QUOTE (martindv @ Feb 16 2008, 01:51 PM) *
how were you to know Frank expected you to read his mind and infer that he meant "when you add Movement"?


Frank ALWAYS uses movement power in any sort of encounter like this.
mfb
well, it makes sense. a group of smart players who got together and tried something like this would do the same thing (obviously, since the group of players brainstorming here suggested it), so it's reasonable to me that military planners would do it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012