QUOTE (stevebugge @ Feb 20 2008, 07:49 PM)
We get you don't like Seattle, but seriously moving Shadowrun away from Seattle to make it more like other games would have been a major branding mistake for the entire franchise. I think in that aspect they are handling things correctly by trying to add in more locations, hence why I support trying to include locations which have little or no previous development, particularly for the secondary locations in the new setting books over updating and rehashing the same old locations over and over.
I ... I
what? I love Seattle. I hate the Seattle chapter in Runner Havens. Big difference.
My point is not to draw focus away from Seattle. That decision was made when SR4 came out, and the
first two core settings were Seattle and Hong Kong, plus now Los Angeles and Neo-Tokyo, and soon coming Chicago and so on (to include another from Feral Cities; and two from the following placeholder titles: Awakened Haunts, Cities of Intrigue, Strange Places. I'm not the one who wants 12+ core sprawls. Well, I want more major cities covered in depth and know that whole books on individual cities (or even nations) are never going to come again. The developers have done that. I'm just trying to help out.
At this point, I have seen a great deal of support and good reasons for Washington and London. Are they the best cities in the world? No. Are they familiar cities with some background material already, combined with existing or seeded plot ideas? Yes? Are those ideas 'intrigue'? Yes. If nothing else, look at the Technocratic Party entry in Emergence and then look at the end of System Failure where the husband and consort of the Queen of England is Johnny Spinrad, who brings any number of plots across Portugal and France with him to England.
The other problem being that other cities that might be wanted are omitted because they've just been covered in other books. It's been two years since Runner Havens came out, and since SR4 is using its own time and not necessarily 1:1 real years:game years it's not as pressed for time as it may have been before to cover some location that was just written up a little while ago.
Frank's coverage seems pretty good if there is some sort of template: North America and Far East Asia (or Europe) get the two major cities. Minor cities include Africa (finally), Europe (or Far East Asia), Near East Asia, Latin America. Corp Enclaves also added Manhattan because, quite frankly, it was the first and the standard bearer for corporate cities. Omitting it would have been a crime.
However, I am not particularly inclined to regional affirmative action. I didn't make up my own list with that in mind, but I did consider which cities would have different types of intrigue.
Washington, FDC - internal and external conflicts. Post-upheaval conflicts. Espionage. Politics. Pretty much everything that most capitals would have, including Moscow through an easy addition of more
aggressive internal factions and conflicts.
London - Internal conflicts. Now a base for larger global intrigue involving the NEEC and various corporations from NeoNET and Spinrad/S-K. Its role as a major city outside of government, which does not apply to Washington, also places it in the situation of being more than just governmental and international intrigue to financial, cultural and media pressures Washington wouldn't cover.
Geneva - Fair enough this could be Brussels as well, but it would be nice to have a proxy city where everything is generally foreign and requires a lot of foreign work--hence the point of it being covered for shadowrunners--without much commitment to social niceties since getting in doesn't require knowing much. It's nothing local, and they'll be gone before it matters.
Mogadishu - A provincial (occupied?) capital with access to the entire world. Finally overcoming its internal problems and much of its external ones, it is still a city where government and private interests collide: from people wanting it to be part of Ethiopia to freedom fighters straining against the yoke of oppression from Addis Ababa. People who want it to lead the 21st century, and people who want it to be a caliphate, to people (foreigners) who have bought into the idea that by the turn of the century Mogadishu had become the prototypical example of anarcho-capitalism, or even just anarchy.
Dushanbe - the mirror reflection of Geneva. It's a chessboard for foreign proxies, but the conflicts are most definitely rooted with the locals. Unlike Geneva, it is a place where someone can essentially pick up a short-term merc contract, but it has the unfortunate problem of being a place where knowing the history and locals is a necessity.
Bogota - Border city (so it also replaces Austin and St. Louis) stuck between two countries that are on the verge of war, as is also a city stuck between their influence and the influence of the locals. Locals who include the ghost cartels. Smuggling. Espionage. War. Oh my.
Boise - a bit of a mirror to Bogota. It's location on the Tir-Salish-Pueblo border place it at a crossroads where the countries are all generally neutral to friendly with them. Except that it's also a smuggling route, and most of the people on the Pueblo side are actually Utes whose country was annexed by 'radishes' and pinkskins.
Manila - Manila has always been a mess. When things looks better in 2064, the bottom fell out and it just got worse.
QUOTE (Daddy's Little Ninja @ Feb 21 2008, 02:45 PM)
London was covered in its own SB years ago. Would there be that much change?
Well, there was quite a bit of change between then and Shadows of Europe. Since then things haven't seemed to get any more sedate.