Too much to respond to, but I will hit on one point:
QUOTE (kzt @ Aug 18 2008, 10:32 PM)

Part of this is that you can't really get useful feedback on issues from the people who know what the ideas behind the rules are. (Defensive posturing doesn't count as useful feedback) Particularly when you compare it to something like hero, where there is a rules question forum, and the line developer is the only one who can post answers. Which he normally does in under 24 hours. Most of the answers are of the "The text on 5ER 81, under the heading ..." type, but that's also how the several hundred page long FAQ got built, so some questions are non-obvious or just keep coming up.
In one Catalyst Chat, a developer was asked some rules questions, and got them very wrong. I can't recall who it was, and it really doesn't matter; even developers make mistakes. The issue here is that when I have a rules problem, I shouldn't be required to have a solution before I can make a complaint about it. It should be enough that there is a problem, and we need a fix.