Rasumichin
Jan 2 2009, 01:43 PM
QUOTE (hermit @ Jan 2 2009, 12:35 PM)
Someone on the team had to have local contacts or alternatively, they have local help that's at least semi-reliable. Hits had to be prepared a little more carefully than usualthe legwork phase generally was more time-consuming, and PC had to be selected slightly carefully so they won't stand out too much (so no maximally cybered troll combat monsters with an anti-elf attitude).
Sounds like what is suggested for runs in Neo-Tokyo in
Corporate Enclaves.
I don't see where the new setting is enforcing a particular style of play.
Of course, the locations in
Runner Havens are by definition default settings, but the other 4 core settings have very unique effects on gameplay, sometimes down to hard mechanical effects, such as the astral conditions in Chicago.
In any case, each core city will demand a completely different approach to organizing and conducting runs.
Seattle and Hong Kong are relatively similar in this respect, being both developed as standard SR settings.
CeeZee and Lagos both require a completely different skill set and different equipment than the RH sprawls and Tokyo and LA will each demand yet another unique setup of ressources.
Heath Robinson
Jan 2 2009, 01:46 PM
The Yakuza are technically neighbourhood councils and whatnot if I recall correctly, they run festivals and nothing links them back to any crime they commit. Hell, a significant portion of the stuff that the Yakuza do to get their income isn't even an offense. One of the things they do is legitimately attend shareholder meetings and start disturbing proceedings until they're paid to leave.
Tachi
Jan 2 2009, 01:47 PM
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jan 2 2009, 06:27 AM)
and there is probably some real life yakuza hiding in the japanese politics.
and is there not a persistent rumor that the kennedys where in deep with the mafia?
Actually, the Kennedy's made their money by running moonshine during prohibition, that's my understanding of it anyway. But yeah, they probably got in with the mob during that time. It was either that, or their family would not have survived to enter politics. You know how the mob is about people cutting into their cash flow.
hermit
Jan 2 2009, 03:08 PM
QUOTE
the other 4 core settings have very unique effects on gameplay, sometimes down to hard mechanical effects, such as the astral conditions in Chicago.
They do? In regard to how to approach runs, I see little difference between Lagos, Chicago, Seattle, Hong Kong, and Los Angeles. sure, some subtleties are different, whether you need to pack nuyen or gold, whether you need to buy this or that medicine and whether or not half the character types are shafted despite running in a highly developed first-world nation ... but where do these settings encourage something other than "we go there, shoot everyone, take the macguffin, shoot everyone else and ride off into the sunset"? Yes, Neo-Tokyo is slightly different, because you don't shoot people there, you slash them. With swords.
wanderer_king
Jan 2 2009, 04:49 PM
A (somewhat) interesting thought: most Yakuza in SR are portrayed has having connections with one of the Japanacorps (mostly Mitsuhama) so...
If they have a Mitsuhama SIN, and Licenses to carry milspec gear, and were careful to target the SINless, anything they do could be considered to be Corp duties, and thus not illegal. (SINless don't have rights so you can't commit crimes against them.) Attacking them means fighting someone protected by being a AAA citizen... and you are kinda screwed from there....
(SINless... no one will protect you, SINners, unless your corp is willing to play politics to save your ass may just find the Corp/Government you are a citizen of arresting you for assaulting someone while trying to defend yourself....)
wind_in_the_stones
Jan 2 2009, 05:55 PM
QUOTE
I've never seen a group of PCs ever go to the Tir. We pissed off GMs several times, but it's just STUPID to go there. There are always other ways to make money that don't have a >75% chance of getting you killed.
QUOTE
the initial presentations of Japan and Tir Tairngire basically took what could have been two awesome settings to run in, and went too hog-wild slopping on the dark distopia, resulting in two paranoid, racist police states that runners had absolutely no desire to go to.
I find these comments kinda strange (along with several others). We went to TT once. It was cleaner, and you stood out if you weren't careful, but as long as you made an effort, and your characters weren't too crazy to begin with, you didn't have any problems. Really, it was the GM's responsibility to give the characters a fighting chance, if he wanted the team to go there.
And that's really what it's all about - making the settings good for what you want them to be good for. I understand how you get roped into assuming a certain style for locales, because everyone's read the books and has that common understanding. I think you've got to discuss it, and come to a new understanding.
QUOTE (hermit @ Jan 2 2009, 04:35 AM)
Someone on the team had to have local contacts or alternatively, they have local help that's at least semi-reliable. Hits had to be prepared a little more carefully than usualthe legwork phase generally was more time-consuming, and PC had to be selected slightly carefully so they won't stand out too much (so no maximally cybered troll combat monsters with an anti-elf attitude). Worked fairly well then, though. You gotta like a more spy games approach to the setting, of course, if you're in for more cinematic action, this really isn't your kinda thing. It'd be nice if the setting would stop to try and enforce any play style, though.
Every contact you have there has a 20% chance of being an informer. How many people do you have to interact with before you have a >50% of having an informer as part of your support system? How do you think crooks survive in these societies? They survive by feeding useful stuff to the police so the police don't arrest them again. Either that, or you are carrying out a deniable task for the secret police. How can they keep it really deniable? What kind of men tell no tales? How can three people keep a secret?
An interesting account of what happens when you try to set up secret operations in a closed police state is here:
Spies and Commandos: How America Lost the Secret War in North Vietnam Every single operator was captured or killed in short order and the people running the network had no idea that it was totally compromised and controlled by the enemy. All you need in one mistake early on and everyone else gets fed into the meat grinder.
hermit
Jan 2 2009, 08:07 PM
QUOTE
Every contact you have there has a 20% chance of being an informer. How many people do you have to interact with before you have a >50% of having an informer as part of your support system?
I really wonder where you get those numbers from ... and word-of-mouth works well, especially in the underworld in a totalitarian system. Crooks survive by being tighter and more suspicious of outsiders, and by being on guard in general (unlike slackers like islamic terrorists in the West who haven't realised yet how tight western states' surveillance programs have become). Odds are, they won't all spy at each other. Those that survive do so because they don't. Of course, some interaction with the sectret police is inevitable - which is why, in such states, there usually is no distinction between secret police and organised crime. Just look at Russia!
And as for why not off the PCs - they may be useful to the johnson (usually someone from within the system) in the fututre, they may not know enough to be dangerous, or they may be fed false information which, if spread, benefits the johnson in some way. Also, some secret service people actually don't habitualkly kill everyone they used for operations once. Handydata bombs that go off if you do propably help that attitude, of course.
When I recently reread the Tir na nOg book, I was utterly depressed when I realised how similar this location (intended as a wacko eco-socialist quasi-dictatorship) has become to most EU nations. The isolation is more like East Germany used to be, but even there, plenty of espionage occurred (and a certain amount of crime). A police state may seem intimidating, but no police state is perfect.
Yet, organised crime still occurs here (like Mafia hits on open streets in broad daylight, or a mobster war that involved throwing grenades into crowded nightclubs), there is no crook shortage, and there are cracks to slip through.
As for the book: Espionage has always been something the US has sucked in for some reason. Other countries have been much more successful in infiltrating very closed societies. France, for instance.
Chrysalis
Jan 2 2009, 08:24 PM
The reason in the United States is an over-reliance on technical intelligence gathering. Human intelligence gathering is often with financial incentives. Also the CIA still has fast rate in change of personnel at stations, substandard pay to the private sector, and from 2003 onwards instigated a policy of commission pay for every new informant gained. During Bush's period decision making intelligence has also been tinged with making sure that its fits in with current White House ideology.
The majority of the informants the United States has and has had since the 1980s is either low-level informants or high-level political informants. Both are involved due to financial incentives and not due to ideology.
-Chrysalis
Larme
Jan 2 2009, 09:30 PM
It's ok, we just make puppy dog eyes at the British, and they tell us what's going on...
...including that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction...
Damn you tea-sucking limeys!
Heath Robinson
Jan 2 2009, 10:13 PM
Be quiet, yank. Just be glad that we threw ourselves into the same quagmire.
If you want to blame someone, blame Antony for biasing that report to coincide with George's wish to go to war with Iraq.
Wounded Ronin
Jan 3 2009, 02:15 AM
I love having tea in the afternoon.
Jackstand
Jan 3 2009, 02:31 AM
You just reminded me. I bought tea yesterday. I should make some. Thank you!
QUOTE (hermit @ Jan 2 2009, 01:07 PM)
I really wonder where you get those numbers from
A miss remembering of the Stasi informer numbers. Which actually seem to have from 1% to 4% of the population (depending on how you count them) and about 5% for party members. The figure 20% I think comes from dissident organizations, where it later turned out that about 20% of the members were secret police spies.
AngelisStorm
Jan 3 2009, 08:25 AM
QUOTE (wanderer_king @ Jan 2 2009, 12:49 PM)
...and were careful to target the SINless, anything they do could be considered to be Corp duties, and thus not illegal. (SINless don't have rights so you can't commit crimes against them.)
SINless are basically illegal immigrants. It's still murder when you kill someone who isn't a resident of your country. If LoneStar (example) sees an Ares employee in Seattle gun down a homeless person, they are still going to be arrested and prosecuted (unless your corp "bails" you out, owing the Star a favor). It would make LoneStar look bad otherwise. Corp citizens are residents of a different country, not ambassadors.
And yeah, the US has always sucked at espionage. What Chrysalis said. We like our toys to much, and think they can solve all our problems. (Same deal with war; we get cool toys and look down on soldiers, until we get into a war and remember "Oh right, we need people to stand there and hold the flag.")
Tachi
Jan 3 2009, 08:38 AM
QUOTE (Chrysalis @ Jan 2 2009, 01:24 PM)
The reason in the United States is an over-reliance on technical intelligence gathering. Human intelligence gathering is often with financial incentives. Also the CIA still has fast rate in change of personnel at stations, substandard pay to the private sector, and from 2003 onwards instigated a policy of commission pay for every new informant gained. During Bush's period decision making intelligence has also been tinged with making sure that its fits in with current White House ideology.
The majority of the informants the United States has and has had since the 1980s is either low-level informants or high-level political informants. Both are involved due to financial incentives and not due to ideology.
-Chrysalis
That's part of it. It's also because the politicians here, no matter which side their on, will actively work against the current policies if they disagree with them, occasionally going so far as to give classified intel to our enemies. If you add to that the fact that in a free society you're easily infiltrated, all hell tends to break loose. For example, before and during the Viet Nam war communist spies from the USSR (and everywhere else) were infiltrating colleges in the U.S. (in fact they bankrolled the majority of the anti-war movement back then) to turn the youth against the government and get connections with future government interns and aids. Damned sneaky Russians. You gotta hand it to them though, they
were are GOOD at what they
did do.
Edit: Good point.
Correction per AngelisStorm
AngelisStorm
Jan 3 2009, 09:42 AM
Crazy Russians are good at what they do. It's the scary part. They just don't look high enough. We have that crazy American Dream that makes us build intercontinental multiheaded super nukes, nuclear submarines to carry said nukes, and planes that don't have to land for days to carry more nukes. Oh, and invent nukes.
Russia, on the other hand, builds crazy good things with what basically amounts to widgets, ductape, and paper clips (the latter two which they likely stole or bought from us). They build 10 bagilion nukes. They build 10 million super quiet diesel submarines. And of course AK-47s, in numbers that don't have numbers to describe them.
And Winter. Thank goodness they haven't figured out how to make a winter powered death ray. It's bad enough they have a semi-senient quasy diety that impersonates a season.
Chrysalis
Jan 3 2009, 10:47 AM
While American intelligence gathering is a fascinating subject and I am sure we can all come with anecdotal information to back it up. I believe we were talking about Japanese society and how it can go back to being more extreme than the 1940s version of Japan.
Japan has never addressed their participation in the second world war which could lead to a radicalization of its populace. However, you would really have to remove the upper echelons of power (party leaders and diet members), who have no reason to change the way business is being conducted at the moment. Money flows into their pockets, and they remain on the top of power pyramid. An imperialised Japan means that every move is a gamble and at some point you will lose. So things then continue the way they have.
hobgoblin
Jan 3 2009, 10:58 AM
unless the economy becomes somehow militarized.
was there not something about orbital microwave platforms before imperial japan was announced?
ah, no. the orbitals came into place afterwards.
first there was a korean war, with the south backed by japan (that had north missiles fired at it, but said missiles failed to do anything).
end result, north goes bye bye, japan goes imperial.
Larme
Jan 3 2009, 03:32 PM
QUOTE (Chrysalis @ Jan 3 2009, 05:47 AM)
Japan has never addressed their participation in the second world war which could lead to a radicalization of its populace. However, you would really have to remove the upper echelons of power (party leaders and diet members), who have no reason to change the way business is being conducted at the moment. Money flows into their pockets, and they remain on the top of power pyramid. An imperialised Japan means that every move is a gamble and at some point you will lose. So things then continue the way they have.
I think multiple worldwide crashes and plagues would provide ample opportunity for an Imperial government to supplant the plutocrat elite. And the people might support that, feeling that their "democracy" has been bought by the wealthy and left them with nothing. Sure, they have universal healthcare, but social mobility really sucks in Japan, as I understand it. Also, whatever government was in charge could easily suffer from the crashes, even if there was nothing they could have done to prevent them, people would still be looking for someone to blame.
Warlordtheft
Jan 3 2009, 03:42 PM
QUOTE (Larme @ Jan 2 2009, 04:30 PM)
It's ok, we just make puppy dog eyes at the British, and they tell us what's going on...
...including that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction...
Damn you tea-sucking limeys!
Hey, blame Saddam while you're at it. He was playing a dangerous game of political chicken and lost. He didn't have the weapons but because he did not want the Iranians to invade he never wanted the international community to prove it.
BTW-They did find some, a few shells here and there (which people forget), but no massive stockpiles.
AllTheNothing
Jan 4 2009, 12:01 AM
Speaking of not so kind things Japan did, I've heard that it applied a eugenetic politic that implied sterilizing peoples with phisical defects; is it true?
Barenziahlover58
Jan 4 2009, 02:25 AM
QUOTE (Larme @ Dec 30 2008, 03:21 PM)
I actually had the opposite impression -- 80's cyberpunk belies something of an obsession with Japanese culture. Why else would ninjas and samurais be the coolest thing since giant sunglasses?
I think the general feeling in the 80's was that it wasn't a question of if the Japanese would take over the world, it was when. Sure, there were some people who hated Japan for having a boom during the 80's. But IMO, writers like Gibson and the Shadowrun team were simply doing what sci-fi authors do: imagining the future. If we accept the fact that Japan will become the world's dominant economic power, the next step is to write about what the future will be like when they control everything.
One thing I've noticed is that some people believe that portraying the real oddities of Japanese culture is racist -- by pointing to silly things that happen in Japan, we're somehow saying that the Japanese are silly or backwards. Of course, there's a definite double standard there; if you go to some kind of "hillbilly olympics" event and film rural Americans competing in events like doing belly flops into mud, you're not racist, you're a social commentator. Hell, even if you call them "white trash" and imply that their gene pool is a cesspit of incest, you probably won't be called a racist because lots of people will say "it isn't racist if it's true." The fact is, Japanese culture can be pretty weird to a westerner, and talking about the differences between cultures isn't racist, it's just a natural part of human curiosity.
But it you keep saying look at those japs doing this werid thing all the time you see this and talking about bad it is. Like women who wear headscraf are oppress by the men of they culture. Racist isnot alway bad. In the 1920's thought 1940's
the mayor of all major cities in america where white male who where racist toward black people but they didnot think they where superity to them. They have all black fire department and all black police department in the all black area of the city., even the orginize crime have than all black mafric which handle all criminal activilly in all black area of the city.
There was alway the racist KKK which was very powerful back them. In the 1950's the idear that non-white where not as capacity as white people rear it ulgy head. The all black fire and police department where ended. Then the racist riots started in the late 1960's and early 1970's. The country I grew up in have than upperclass woman who like wild sex goto biker bar to have sex with the biker. She was marry to than wealthy bussiener owner. One night she went into than biker bar walk up to some hell angle type removeing her clothes in front of then and in front of 6 black biker , she place her hand in avery suggestive mannor on the men there and then she started to undress the biker. After this she started to worry about what her hushand would di it she was pregeant by than black man, this was every taaboo black thewn. So she devide to file phoney rape charge against the six black biker. They where arrest by the local police. Unknow to her the biker bar have touble like this in the past so they have than camoner filming this along another biker filming this also
with his own camoner and other guest also film this. The lawyer for the six black got hold of the film than show it to the racist DA who took one look at them and dropped all rape charge against them. The country was 50% black and the country leaders want no race riot if it can be help. The country was willing to risk riots if the rape charge where true but not when they where phony.
hobgoblin
Jan 4 2009, 02:55 AM
QUOTE (AllTheNothing @ Jan 4 2009, 01:01 AM)
Speaking of not so kind things Japan did, I've heard that it applied a eugenetic politic that implied sterilizing peoples with phisical defects; is it true?
not the only place at that time. im sad to say that even norway had one of those policies in place...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics
Barenziahlover58
Jan 4 2009, 03:03 AM
QUOTE (Glyph @ Jan 1 2009, 01:54 AM)
Ehh, making Japan a bunch of racists who send metahumans to an island prison is about as plausible as Americans rounding up the Indians and sending them to death camps (which is to say, not at all, but acceptable within the context of a setting that is too dumb to be taken that seriously). But they went too damn far with everything in how they portrayed the Japanese (they have a youth culture that is challenging lots of things today, and you also have to factor in the globalizing factors of a worldwide matrix and the near-collapse of nation states, and how they would make a closed society far less likely). Not just Yomi Island, but all of the other things - banning escrima in the Phillipines, saying how carrying a katana and wakizashi will get you in trouble if a Japanese company man sees you... they are just bland, stereotypical bad guys.
Damn it, Japan should be a cool place to shadowrun in, with tattooed yakuza guys, company men with katanas, ninjas hopping across rooftops, cutting edge tech - instead, much like the Tir, they made it into this ugly, nasty place that no runner would ever want to go to.
Hilter have to wait untril 1941 before he was able to set up death camp. The germany people and culture wouldnot allow him to do so openly. He would have being remove for trying to setup death camp.
Barenziahlover58
Jan 4 2009, 03:10 AM
QUOTE (Warlordtheft @ Jan 3 2009, 08:42 AM)
Hey, blame Saddam while you're at it. He was playing a dangerous game of political chicken and lost. He didn't have the weapons but because he did not want the Iranians to invade he never wanted the international community to prove it.
BTW-They did find some, a few shells here and there (which people forget), but no massive stockpiles.
During world war I around Washington DC we have than place that manufactor poision gases. After WWI it was shut down and the shells and tanks of poision gases where bury in the ground on site. In the 1990's they started to leak poision gases and the government have to dig up those old shells and tanks.
Those few old shells donot count as than WND programing. In the 1970' and 1980's we gave him mustard and nerve gases and the know how to manufacted then.
Barenziahlover58
Jan 4 2009, 03:22 AM
QUOTE (wanderer_king @ Jan 2 2009, 09:49 AM)
A (somewhat) interesting thought: most Yakuza in SR are portrayed has having connections with one of the Japanacorps (mostly Mitsuhama) so...
If they have a Mitsuhama SIN, and Licenses to carry milspec gear, and were careful to target the SINless, anything they do could be considered to be Corp duties, and thus not illegal. (SINless don't have rights so you can't commit crimes against them.) Attacking them means fighting someone protected by being a AAA citizen... and you are kinda screwed from there....
(SINless... no one will protect you, SINners, unless your corp is willing to play politics to save your ass may just find the Corp/Government you are a citizen of arresting you for assaulting someone while trying to defend yourself....)
In fedural Japon than Samurize would behead all the peseant on his fief an get away with it. First his overload might be unwilling to sent anymore peseant over to his fief just to make than blood thrister killer happy. It cannot stop than other fiefholder from takeing action against you it you murruder his peasents. Fedural Japon needed those farmer to grow the food they needed to feed the population so it than warrier was killing too many farmer the government would tell him to stop do so.
Barenziahlover58
Jan 4 2009, 03:31 AM
Japon is going thought depopulation as there is more people dieing than being born it is than very serious problim. At one piont the government would have to import alarge population of people from than culture where child birth is more common. First the organing people of japon where white and they are still there with special right like they can converse they culture and langure, are allow to have than certain number of seat in the Dict no matter what they population is. Depopulation is what ended the western roman empire.
hobgoblin
Jan 4 2009, 03:41 AM
most of the developed world is watching said post-war population boom turning into a bust.
QUOTE (AllTheNothing @ Jan 3 2009, 05:01 PM)
Speaking of not so kind things Japan did, I've heard that it applied a eugenetic politic that implied sterilizing peoples with phisical defects; is it true?
So did the US, and Sweden, and....
QUOTE (Barenziahlover58 @ Jan 3 2009, 08:10 PM)
Those few old shells donot count as than WND programing. In the 1970' and 1980's we gave him mustard and nerve gases and the know how to manufacted then.
Unless you live in Germany "We" is the wrong word.
QUOTE (Barenziahlover58 @ Jan 3 2009, 08:03 PM)
Hilter have to wait untril 1941 before he was able to set up death camp. The germany people and culture wouldnot allow him to do so openly. He would have being remove for trying to setup death camp.
Unless you were a soldier on the Eastern front it was all pretty much hidden from everyone not directly involved until 1944. Lots of people who lived near the camps were able to convince themselves that nothing bad was going on until after the war.
QUOTE (Barenziahlover58 @ Jan 3 2009, 08:22 PM)
In fedural Japon than Samurize would behead all the peseant on his fief an get away with it. First his overload might be unwilling to sent anymore peseant over to his fief just to make than blood thrister killer happy. It cannot stop than other fiefholder from takeing action against you it you murruder his peasents. Fedural Japon needed those farmer to grow the food they needed to feed the population so it than warrier was killing too many farmer the government would tell him to stop do so.
No, the buke had an absolute right to kill any peasant (or other lower class) who, in his opinion, showed disrespect. Kiri-sute gomen. It's not the kind of thing that needs to exercised very often to make the point.
hobgoblin
Jan 4 2009, 04:08 AM
QUOTE (kzt @ Jan 4 2009, 04:50 AM)
Unless you live in Germany "We" is the wrong word.
i think that was about saddam hussein, not adolf hitler...
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jan 3 2009, 09:08 PM)
i think that was about saddam hussein, not adolf hitler...
The Germans were who sold Saddam the nerve agent factory. Karl Kolb, NPI, Hoechst, along with some Italian and Dutch suppliers.
Adarael
Jan 4 2009, 05:03 AM
Factory, maybe. But the training on how to use that factory was taught by US, UK, and French personnel. What's more, the CDC gave Hussein biological agents for the express purpose of weaponizing them - most notably Anthrax.
The US cannot wash its hands of everything having to do with Iraq's WMD program. Let's be honest here: in the early 80s, it was better for US interests to arm a dictator than to allow the expansion of the Tehrani regime. Hussein had demonstrated he was no friend of Tehran's, and Tehran had just finished demonstrating how much it didn't like the US.
QUOTE (Adarael @ Jan 3 2009, 10:03 PM)
What's more, the CDC gave Hussein biological agents for the express purpose of weaponizing them - most notably Anthrax.
Um, no, the CDC would send just about any government just about any infectious disease in the 80s for research. After 'all the search for knowledge transcends international borders'. Ever try to get academics to face the real world?
"I don't think it would be accurate to say the United States government deliberately provided seed stocks to the Iraqis' biological weapons programs," said Jonathan Tucker, a former U.N. biological weapons inspector. "But they did deliver samples that Iraq said had a legitimate public health purpose, which I think was naive to believe, even at the time."
Larme
Jan 4 2009, 04:01 PM
By the way, Anthrax isn't some kind of rare super-bug. It just has a real scary name... You can find it all over the place wherever sheep live. Its real power as an infectious agent isn't its deadliness, but the fact that people who get respiratory infections from it don't look that sick until they die, there's not much to clue doctors to give the right antibiotic. But if you dosed a whole population with it, they would pretty quickly know what happened and probably only a few people would die... [/off topic]
So yeah... Japan! Um... Why did we decide to call it Japan anyway, it's not because English-speakers can't say its real name... I bet it's the fault of the British, they are really really bad at pronouncing foreign words if you listen to the BBC (though they've started to hire some people who make the effort, in recent years).
hermit
Jan 4 2009, 04:06 PM
It's, for all I know, the fault of the Portuguese, who opened up the first trading post there.
Snow_Fox
Jan 4 2009, 04:09 PM
QUOTE (kzt @ Jan 3 2009, 11:02 PM)
No, the buke had an absolute right to kill any peasant (or other lower class) who, in his opinion, showed disrespect. Kiri-sute gomen. It's not the kind of thing that needs to exercised very often to make the point.
Right, this is where the Japanese mania for manners comes from. In a society where being even perceived as being disrespectful might result in a beheading, you learn to be very respectful.
Cang
Jan 4 2009, 04:14 PM
Hey don't blame the Portuguese, at least they did something right and founded Brazil. I'd blame the mongols for not doing the land invasion right after their first victory.
Wounded Ronin
Jan 4 2009, 04:36 PM
If only the Portugese had sent enough Portugese sausage to Iraq Saddam Hussein would have had a fatal heart attack before any of this crap went down. So it's really all their fault for not exporting enough unhealthy food.
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Jan 4 2009, 09:09 AM)
Right, this is where the Japanese mania for manners comes from. In a society where being even perceived as being disrespectful might result in a beheading, you learn to be very respectful.
I suspect that this isn't true; formal manners seemed to be very heavy in 'The Tale of Genji' (a view of the nobility during the Heian period), but it's an interesting thought.
ornot
Jan 4 2009, 08:14 PM
The main reason anthrax is so commonly considered as a useful bug for bioweapons is the damn things resilience. Anthrax forms spores that can survive for years and years and years. I recall there was a test of an anthrax bomb on an island someplace, and the spores were still infectious decades later.
Critias
Jan 4 2009, 08:23 PM
QUOTE (hermit @ Jan 1 2009, 02:51 PM)
Escrima developed because the Americans banned weapons very much like the Japanese did in SR back when they tried themselves at colonizing the Phillipines.
Escrima was around a long time before the Americans won the Philippines in 1898. And to be fair, disarming them was a little bit nicer than what the Spanish did to Escrima/Arnis/Kali practitioners -- under Spanish rule, the Filipino martial arts were banned on pain of death.
I find the Japanese banning the Filipino arts to be one of the more
realistic of their draconian, mustachio-twirling, traits in the SR universe.
AllTheNothing
Jan 4 2009, 08:44 PM
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jan 4 2009, 03:55 AM)
not the only place at that time. im sad to say that even norway had one of those policies in place...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics I didn't think japanese racism was so overt, one think (even if highly detestable) is discriminating foreigners and make them social rejects, but apply eugenics to conserve racial purity (strange they didn't mind when they were raping girl, pardon confort women, during the WW2) is a wholy different level of racism (and not in the good direction).
No wonder Japan was portraied as it has been.......... lets hope in the new generation.
P.S.
I personaly have nothing against Japanese, I just HATE racism so it's not my intenction offending anyone but there are things that I find deplorable and Japan has done quite a few of them (as far as my knowledge goes).
Heath Robinson
Jan 4 2009, 09:33 PM
As someone has undoubtedly mentioned, Eugenics was an in thing for pretty much all developed nations at the time. Including the US and Britain.
People getting on the Japanese for their crimes during the war are forgetting that rape and murder is pretty much a given in any war that has a moving front and it's not like your troops didn't do it just because your flag contains stripes. Japan did do some terrible things, yes. So did the US, so did Britain and so would China if they had the chance. You've got to bet that Russian soldiers did some terrible things on their way into Berlin.
It just seems that more people whitewash US and British atrocities. Firebombing wooden cities, firebombing Dresden, levelling cities to the ground. Accounts of rape by American troops occupying Japan, criminal conduct by British forces in Asia. WW2 is not the nice neat white against black that people like to think it was. Both sides were bastards, but we won and got to ensure our propaganda became the common myth.
hermit
Jan 4 2009, 10:48 PM
QUOTE
People getting on the Japanese for their crimes during the war are forgetting that rape and murder is pretty much a given in any war that has a moving front and it's not like your troops didn't do it just because your flag contains stripes.
To be fair, you were the most moderate and well-disciplined army in that respect. Of course, you made that up by carpet-bombing civilian population centers rather than military infrastructure during the war, prolonging it AND seeding widespread misery and firey phosphory death, but hey, nobody's perfect.
QUOTE
You've got to bet that Russian soldiers did some terrible things on their way into Berlin.
Nothing ours didn't do to the Russkies first, though.
QUOTE
It just seems that more people whitewash US and British atrocities. Firebombing wooden cities, firebombing Dresden, levelling cities to the ground. Accounts of rape by American troops occupying Japan, criminal conduct by British forces in Asia. WW2 is not the nice neat white against black that people like to think it was. Both sides were bastards, but we won and got to ensure our propaganda became the common myth.
The scope of atrocities was different, though this war was hell for everyone involved indeed (save for the US populace - lucky guys).
QUOTE (hermit @ Jan 4 2009, 03:48 PM)
To be fair, you were the most moderate and well-disciplined army in that respect. Of course, you made that up by carpet-bombing civilian population centers rather than military infrastructure during the war, prolonging it AND seeding widespread misery and firey phosphory death, but hey, nobody's perfect.
Don't be the guys with the crappy bombers who decide the path to victory is by bombing London flat.... Payback can be severe and pity was in short supply in those days.
Larme
Jan 4 2009, 11:44 PM
IMO, two wrongs don't make a right, and all sides were wrong in WWII. However, there is also such a thing as the lesser of two evils, and it doesn't take an ethics professor to figure out which one that was. It's not just a case of whitwashing, I'm sure that if evil had a weight, the Axis would easily tip the scales over compared to the Allies. Well, maybe if you exclude Russia, especially Russia's race to kill as many Russians as possible.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.