QUOTE (TBRMInsanity @ Jul 7 2009, 10:40 AM)
Mechas as a military weapon are a silly idea (and this comes from an avid Battletech player). They are too big of targets on the modern battlefield and you would be better off making a multiped walking tank instead (kinda like the
UN spider tank in Patlabor II).
Like I said elsewhere, if you want a REALLY good disertation on what kind of weapons systems would make a lot of sense if you had access to some really wicked future material science and power systems (Unobtanium and Hip Pocket Antimatter or similar to borrow from the DS vernacular), check out "A Hymn Before Battle" by John Ringo. (First printing, October 2000 ISBN: 0-671-31941-8 ) He goes into great detail about what you would need in an environment where near-light-speed weapons with fantastical ranges and computer-controled fire-control systems are the predominant threat on the battlefield. It's all about lines-of-sight, stealth, maneuverability and the ability to use terrain-masking (cover). Stealth is vital, and armor is critical, but ultimately a direct hit with a high power system is going to be fatal. Flying drones, in an era where even shadowrunners can get their hands on vehicular turreted lasers? It's going to be all about stealth on the future battlefield boys and girls, make no mistake.
QUOTE
On the military side, power armour would be the more likely development. This would allow individual soldiers to maintain a small radar and target signature and increase their lethality against enemy troops. I actually think drones are the true future of military forces as it costs over $40,000 and 2 years of training to "make" a soldier but $10,000 - $30,000 and a couple of weeks to make a decent drone. Plus no one cries over a dead drone (except the tech in charge of fixing it).
Exactly. But keep in mind my above comment about flying drones. The modern Predator/Reaper and Global Hawk would be sitting targets. GPS? In a major conflict, satellite communications is going to be one of the first casualties in the opening hours. Same goes for satellite imagery. If it's visible and has a predictable path, it's dead. Stealthy satellites are going to be problematical: you have to either have solar arrays or a means to dump surplus heat overboard, and that's hard to hide. Worse, you'd need some heavy-duty visual stealth to deal with the whole "Hey, what just blocked out that star?" issue.
Powered armor, at the high end, could be made "hardened" in that non-penetrating hits do no additional damage. It could be made stealthy in a meaningful fashion - but don't think that simply being man-sized means a low RCS (Radar Cross Section). The (retired) F-117A Nighthawk stealth fighter had a specially designed canopy, because the pilot's HELMET would have had a significantly larger RCS than the entire aircraft! But even ISAR (Inverse Synthetic Apeture RADAR) is limited in ground targeting at long ranges, especially against immobile targets. On-board heat management systems would allow you to store up great amounts of human-generate waste heat while stationary for later dumping to get them all the way down to ambient environmental temperature. With the exoskeletal musculature locked, the soldier could sleep and be immobile in nearly any position. On-board closed life support could even eliminate trace CO2 traces. They can take care of even shallow depressions in the earth (or, toss out a compact but powerful "cratering" charge and Presto! instant foxhole). They can skirt the reverse slope of a hill to avoid detection. They can be made heavily enough armored to resist all but the heaviest anti-vehicular weapons, and that class of weapon is notoriously dificult to use to hit a man-sized target (lasers and other non-ballistic weapons being the obvious exception). In exchange, those PCA (Powered Combat Armor) suits (ACPA in CP2020 parlance) can carry substantial armament heavy enough to neutralize most weapons heavy enough to hurt them in return, bringing the equation back to stealth, maneuver and first-strike.QUOTE (nezumi @ Jul 7 2009, 06:04 PM)
Self-destruct makes sense when there's technology on board which is classified. In the example of Star Trek, twice Kirk had his hands on cloaking technology (and apparently managed to lose it before it could be properly studied and copied). I'm sure the Federation has classified technology as well - and so do Renraku, Aztechnology, Ares and so on, that they would rather destroy than let fall into their competitors' hands.
QUOTE (TBRMInsanity @ Jul 7 2009, 08:46 PM)
Again you wouldn't have a self-destruct button. You would be taught the proper procedures on how to make a piece of equipment useless to the enemy. Usually this meant opening the device up and setting off a WF grenade inside it. It is a very effective way of "neutralizing" classified equipment and the best part is you can't accidentally trigger it.
Both responses are essentially correct: self-destruct, if you had to implement it hurriedly (read: in a single IP), could easily be limited to some sort of device which destroys key components: the entire shell of the vehicle need not be blown to smithereens to render the technology un-usable, otherwise you're building in a needlessly large vulnerability into the vehicle. And if the technology is in something intrinsic (say, like, the armor), there is NOTHING you can do (short of destabilizing a fusion reactor) to completely deny the enemy the ability to analyze the technology - even high explosives aren't going to turn the trick.
QUOTE (the_real_elwood @ Jul 12 2009, 08:13 PM)
After this thread, I went back and looked over Maximum Metal for CP2020, and I was just thinking how awesome it'd be to have a book like that for Shadowrun. Though, all the people who think Shadowrun can only be a street-level game would probably get all butt-hurt about it.
But yeah, ACPA creation rules for Shadowrun would be killer.
We essentially have the workable version with what's in Arsenal... minus heavy armor rules. The suits presented in CP 2020 (I loved Maximum Metal, by the by) suffer from a key weakness as depicted: ground pressure. You have to be careful that the applied pressure of the system (read: individual feet in this case) don't exert such force as to immobilize them in the terrain (go through the floor). It's not going to do you a lot of good to have a massively powerful suit if it's restricted to reinforced ferocrete runways. Wide long pressure plates (soles) can aleviate this to some extent, but you're not going to see the kind of assault ACPA in those rules in Shadowrun.