Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Solid Tires
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
Christian Lafay
QUOTE (Saint Hallow @ Nov 9 2011, 08:13 PM) *
You can also aim for wood gas.

I was unaware of that option till I watched the TV show The Colony. Blew. My. Mind.
EKBT81
QUOTE (Christian Lafay @ Nov 9 2011, 09:39 PM) *
I was unaware of that option till I watched the TV show The Colony. Blew. My. Mind.


Wood gas was used extensively over here in Europe during WW2 and the years immediately after. I guess it'd be a decent option for countries like Amazonia or the Tirs with magically induced excessive wood growth.
Christian Lafay
QUOTE (EKBT81 @ Nov 9 2011, 09:51 PM) *
Wood gas was used extensively over here in Europe during WW2 and the years immediately after. I guess it'd be a decent option for countries like Amazonia or the Tirs with magically induced excessive wood growth.

Bringing another world in (I like tech, sue me) I think that there would be some way to find a way to increase the growth rate of trees like in Eureka. Or at least finding a way of using Kudzu for wood gas.
hobgoblin
QUOTE (EKBT81 @ Nov 9 2011, 10:51 PM) *
Wood gas was used extensively over here in Europe during WW2 and the years immediately after. I guess it'd be a decent option for countries like Amazonia or the Tirs with magically induced excessive wood growth.

Yep, its a repeated story here in Norway from the occupation years. Some creative local or other would install what looked like a boiler on the back of their truck and run it on wood. Temperamental as hell, but allowed him to get things done even tho there was fuel rationing. I think i read about a couple of guys that did a drive into Sweden and back recently using a more recent car they had converted. Btw, i think some are converting their larger diesel cars into running on LPG these days. There is also a uptake of the same in ferries and buses here in Norway.
Tech_Rat
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Nov 9 2011, 04:40 PM) *
Yep, its a repeated story here in Norway from the occupation years. Some creative local or other would install what looked like a boiler on the back of their truck and run it on wood. Temperamental as hell, but allowed him to get things done even tho there was fuel rationing. I think i read about a couple of guys that did a drive into Sweden and back recently using a more recent car they had converted. Btw, i think some are converting their larger diesel cars into running on LPG these days. There is also a uptake of the same in ferries and buses here in Norway.


LPG? Liquid Propane Gas? If so, Some parts of the states are doing that. Nevada, California(can't wait until they break off into Cal-Free.), Utah, Colorado, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. If it isn't all LPG, then it's CNG(Compressed Natural Gas).
CanRay
QUOTE (Tech_Rat @ Nov 9 2011, 03:56 PM) *
If you ever get the chance to get it back, and it still needs work, I wouldn't mind helping you out with it. Who knows. I may even run a game for you to finally play.

Just, no Binky. rotate.gif
There's no chance. frown.gif
Tech_Rat
QUOTE (CanRay @ Nov 9 2011, 06:33 PM) *
There's no chance. frown.gif


Ah. I'm sorry to hear that.
Saint Hallow
How is the current efficiency of today's modern solar panels in converting light to electricity for hybrid/electric vehicles?
Christian Lafay
QUOTE (Saint Hallow @ Nov 10 2011, 05:17 AM) *
How is the current efficiency of today's modern solar panels in converting light to electricity for hybrid/electric vehicles?

I remembering reading an article about someone turning their Tesla Roadster into a disco ball of solar panels. It wasn't infinite energy by any stretch of the imagination but it did increase the distance between charges drastically. Will see if my Google-Fu is still in top shape.
Tech_Rat
From what I remember, we were at an approximate efficiency of 40% in 2007. We may be as high as 70% right now, if I'm not mistaken(Though I highly believe I am).
3278
Commercial solar panels run in the 10 - 15 percent range, with a few standouts just below 20 percent. Lab panels reach 40 percent or higher, but they're either too expensive or otherwise impractical for widespread use...for now.

That said, even with 100 percent efficiency and covering the entire car in solar panels, you couldn't produce enough motive force to propel a modern car under the conditions it actually gets used: too much weight and not enough light. Presumably in Shadowrun, the solution - since I don't think they've changed the output of the sun - has been materials technology directed toward weight savings.
Dahrken
Even with a lot of weight saving I simply don't think a realistic car could operate on sun energy alone.

Iin ideal conditions (equator at high noon and clear sky) the power brought by the sun is about 1 kW/square meter. Assuming a car size of 6x2 meters (twleve square meter collection area) and 50% conversion, this mean the sun brings you a maximum power of roughly 8 hp...
hobgoblin
QUOTE (Tech_Rat @ Nov 10 2011, 02:06 AM) *
LPG? Liquid Propane Gas? If so, Some parts of the states are doing that. Nevada, California(can't wait until they break off into Cal-Free.), Utah, Colorado, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. If it isn't all LPG, then it's CNG(Compressed Natural Gas).

Yep, tho my understanding of the P was Petroleum. Still, checking the pedia it seems it is all the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquefied_petroleum_gas
hobgoblin
On the solar panel issue, i suspect we are looking at the idea that people will have less stamina then the car. As in, people will want to pit stop for food and such, and while doing that the car is sitting in the sun filling up whatever it is using to store energy.
Christian Lafay
More future tech question(s). Ever seen the Perfect Patch infomercials? They throw this chia-pet crap onto concrete and grow grass. I imagine an eco-terrorists walking around with a rig a bit like the goo guns from Ghostbusters covering all the run down buildings and streets with the crap.
CanRay
And the city gardeners shooting them for making them mow even more lawns. nyahnyah.gif
Christian Lafay
The wouldn't be terrorists if they weren't making someone's lives worse. Even gardeners.
Daylen
QUOTE (Tech_Rat @ Nov 10 2011, 06:04 AM) *
From what I remember, we were at an approximate efficiency of 40% in 2007. We may be as high as 70% right now, if I'm not mistaken(Though I highly believe I am).


not even close, even if difficulty scaled linearly we would not be that far along. The record is barely past 40%.
Lindt
Back to the idea of a solid tire.

Weight: The BIG daddy. A 16" tire and rim weight approx. 45 lbs. Unsprung weight (mass that is on the road side of the suspension system) is a huge contributor to handling issues. A 18" ATX rim and a 'solid' tire (lets assume a solid tire only weights 3x as much as normal) would weight 88 lbs. An increase of 172 lbs over 4 wheels. The web site TireRack noticed a handling, ride, economy and performance difference with a 16 lb difference.
Strangely, the wikipedia article is very good on the topic of tire physics. Go check it out.
3278
QUOTE (Lindt @ Nov 11 2011, 06:01 PM) *
...lets assume a solid tire only weights 3x as much as normal...

Where's this figure from?
Lindt
Open assumption. Odds are its even more. I was just picking a number to do my math with.
Draco18s
The density of air at sea level is about 1.2 kg/m^3
The density of Rubber, soft commercial is 1100 kg/m^3

Yeah, I'd say that rubber weighs at least three times that of air (air is generally pumped to about 60 PSI, so even figuring that brings the density up to 144 kg/m^3, that brings rubber up to being 7 times the weight for the same volume).
3278
QUOTE (Lindt @ Nov 11 2011, 08:28 PM) *
Open assumption. Odds are its even more. I was just picking a number to do my math with.

The calculation you're doing, though, seems to be comparing modern commercial tires with what's basically a modern commercial tire so low-profile that there's no pneumatic pocket in it. NPTs are seldom like this, and only in the lowest-speed applications: rubber [or what we call "rubber" when we put it in a tire] can't dissipate heat quickly enough when it's laid in a layer that thick, indeed much of the reason why all passenger tires aren't NPTs.

I guess my point is: why "pick a number to do math with?" The number's almost certainly crazy wrong, so your math's going to end up being at least as crazy wrong. [edit: Which is still short exactly one explanation of why I chose to pedantically interrupt you, sorry. Let me give that a shot. The thing is, NPT technology in Shadowrun is so far out there in terms of NPT technology today that our common sense ideas (read: assumptions) are just completely incorrect. Now, that's always true in Shadowrun, so it's inescapable, but putting precise numbers to something that's not even close to precise is a good way to come to a terrible conclusion. It seems to me like, if you really want NPTs in Shadowrun [not sure why] that aren't Smart Wheels, you should be prepared to be vague: "NPTs will probably be at least a little heavier, and unsprung mass is a killer on handling, and weight is a killer on acceleration and braking. How about a -1 Handling, and some kind of penalty to Acceleration and top speed (due to heat dissipation)?" In short, I'm not saying your idea is wrong, just that inventing numbers to have numbers generally isn't that productive.]

QUOTE (Draco18s @ Nov 11 2011, 08:39 PM) *
The density of air at sea level is about 1.2 kg/m^3
The density of Rubber, soft commercial is 1100 kg/m^3

Maybe this is a common misconception, then. NPTs aren't just "tires with the air replaced with rubber." [Or, as above, "tires with the air replaced with more rim," which is a better solution, but still not practical.] There are a number of different NPT designs, and none of them [for automobiles] is just a solid blob of rubber on a car rim. smile.gif Whatever Shadowrun NPT designs would be, they're almost certainly not going to involve "rubber, soft commercial," or even its equivalent. [Of course, Shadowrun has no need for NPTs, since its run-flat tires are effectively NPTs anyway, but...]

QUOTE (Draco18s @ Nov 11 2011, 08:39 PM) *
...air is generally pumped to about 60 PSI...

In a passenger car tire? I don't put 60 psi in my racing tires! biggrin.gif
Draco18s
</talking out of my ass>

In any case, someone was talking about solid rubber tires, which is what I was trying to respond to.

And if 60 PSI is too high (I don't know what goes in my tires, it's been a while since I looked as I don't have to do it often and there's no point in remembering as a) is written on the tire and b) tends to vary from tire to tire) then it's an extreme example intended to show a relationship.
3278
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Nov 11 2011, 10:02 PM) *
I don't know what goes in my tires, it's been a while since I looked as I don't have to do it often and there's no point in remembering as a) is written on the tire and b) tends to vary from tire to tire...

Typically it's 30-35 psi, but you shouldn't go with what's on the tire: what's on the tire is the maximum safe PSI for that particular tire. Tire inflation is dependent upon car factors more than tire factors, so you should always go with what's in the book over what's on the tire.* Of course, that's only a starting point, as your intended usage, vehicle load, and system wear will all influence the best inflation for your particular circumstance. Just whatever you do, don't inflate to what's on the tire and go for that! smile.gif I used to do that, and while it got me great mileage and incredible grip in the corners, it also gave me a too-firm ride and dangerously uneven tire wear. Blew out a 50 psi racing tire at 80mph, on a public interstate. That kind of driving really wakes a fella up.

*Unless you're running a different tire size than originally specified for the vehicle, in which case I recommend starting at 32 and working your way in whatever direction your usage and load patterns require.

edit: I totally get that you were just using the air-to-rubber comparison as an extreme example. I've no fault with your maths, or your example, only with the idea that inspired it, and that's not yours. No worries.
Paul
What's the old joke Science Fiction stops being Science Fiction and starts being Science Crap when it can't account for modern technology in an internally consistent manner.
Draco18s
QUOTE (3278 @ Nov 11 2011, 04:18 PM) *
Typically it's 30-35 psi, but you shouldn't go with what's on the tire: what's on the tire is the maximum safe PSI for that particular tire. Tire inflation is dependent upon car factors more than tire factors, so you should always go with what's in the book over what's on the tire.*


Tire, book, whatever.
3278
Well, no, for the reasons I already explained and then some, the recommended tire pressure in the manual and the max psi of the tire may well be radically different from one another, and it can be an expensive and dangerous mistake to conflate the two, but you're absolutely right: when someone helps you learn something new, the polite and reasoned response is "whatever."
Draco18s
QUOTE (3278 @ Nov 11 2011, 06:12 PM) *
Well, no, for the reasons I already explained and then some, the recommended tire pressure in the manual and the max psi of the tire may well be radically different from one another, and it can be an expensive and dangerous mistake to conflate the two, but you're absolutely right: when someone helps you learn something new, the polite and reasoned response is "whatever."


Irrelevant point is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Snow_Fox
In WW2 the Italian army used solid tires. They couldn't be punctured BUTif they developed a crack- like from rough roads, over use, or gun fire, they would crumble and fall apart. Personally i'd rather spend extra for the run flaty tires or even drive on rims
Christian Lafay
What about those truck treads they used to sale on late night informercials. http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/i...2/track11-1.jpg
Draco18s
QUOTE (Christian Lafay @ Nov 11 2011, 10:31 PM) *
What about those truck treads they used to sale on late night informercials. http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/i...2/track11-1.jpg


Just don't get any jury rigged sticky bombs on them. wobble.gif
Christian Lafay
I'm honestly surprised there aren't "hover" vehicles. If two skimmer discs can let a troll glide over the floor then I imagine half a dozen could get a bike and a dwarf mobile.
Snow_Fox
There were in earlier games, are you saying they're not in 4th ed?
Christian Lafay
Not to my knowledge.... They have the huge hover boats that like to run over Jackie Chan, but that's it.
Snow_Fox
Dang, another reason not to upgrade
Paul
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Nov 11 2011, 08:51 PM) *
Irrelevant point is irrelevant to the discussion at hand.


ohplease.gif
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Nov 11 2011, 08:58 PM) *
Dang, another reason not to upgrade


Not really, just take the previous edition vehicle, provide it with conversion stats to bring into 4th edition, and viola, Hover bike (or whatever). That is what I am doing. may take a bit of time, but who cares.
Daylen
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Nov 12 2011, 03:58 AM) *
Dang, another reason not to upgrade


Seems SR is sliding backwards in tech, talk about degrading society.
3278
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Nov 12 2011, 03:58 AM) *
Dang, another reason not to upgrade

Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't ever recommend switching from SR3 to SR4, but it's possible that the vehicles you're talking about do exist in SR4. While vehicles in SR4 are a goat rodeo - whole classes missing, no standard suite of classes or consistency between them - it's possible that what you're looking for has been covered, either by a single model in SR4 itself, or by a model or two in Arsenal, or in a PDF since then. What class are you talking about?
Tech_Rat
QUOTE (Christian Lafay @ Nov 11 2011, 10:31 PM) *
What about those truck treads they used to sale on late night informercials. http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/i...2/track11-1.jpg


Looking for these?


QUOTE (Christian Lafay @ Nov 11 2011, 10:45 PM) *
I'm honestly surprised there aren't "hover" vehicles. If two skimmer discs can let a troll glide over the floor then I imagine half a dozen could get a bike and a dwarf mobile.


Don't worry. They're in arsenal.
Fortinbras
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Nov 11 2011, 10:58 PM) *
Dang, another reason not to upgrade

SR4 didn't negate any of the stuff from other editions like some other fourth editions I could name.
If it was in Shadowrun, it's in Shadowrun. It shows up in the SR4 art now and again, too. My team is rather consistent about "renting" a hover limo when they need a high altitude extraction.

Maybe no ones printed up the stats for the things yet, but if they did, everyone on this forum would decry them as "broken."
You like hover bikes; have hover bikes in your game. Stat them yourself before the next book does.
3278
QUOTE (Tech_Rat @ Nov 13 2011, 12:35 PM) *
Looking for these?

And here's what they look like on my car.
Christian Lafay
I've flipped through Aresnal a few times and must have overlooked it... Little help?
3278
I'm not a particular fan of these overly-complex non-pneumatic tire [NPT] designs, but if you're interested in NPTs, keep an eye on the Tokyo Motor Show, starting in a couple of days: Bridgestone is set to show an NPT made of recycled rubber and thermoplastic resin that's a new take on a standard design. It's also another nice way of showing that "runflat" doesn't have to mean "modern air-filled tube with some kind of sealant" or "solid rubber band around a metal rim."
Seriously Mike
QUOTE (Snow_Fox @ Nov 12 2011, 04:51 AM) *
There were in earlier games, are you saying they're not in 4th ed?

They're in Arsenal, "Special Tires", p. 106, lower left corner. I kitted my adept's ride with them.
3278
QUOTE (3278 @ Dec 1 2011, 03:21 AM) *
I'm not a particular fan of these overly-complex non-pneumatic tire [NPT] designs, but if you're interested in NPTs, keep an eye on the Tokyo Motor Show, starting in a couple of days: Bridgestone is set to show an NPT made of recycled rubber and thermoplastic resin that's a new take on a standard design. It's also another nice way of showing that "runflat" doesn't have to mean "modern air-filled tube with some kind of sealant" or "solid rubber band around a metal rim."

Here's a video of the NPTs in question. Novel solution to a common horizontal load problem, but they still have durability, safety, and temperature challenges to overcome before they see widespread deployment, like all NPTs.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012