Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Task spirits, skills and endowments
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
Yerameyahu
Agreed, Bearclaw. And that's RAW, AFAIK, not my weird suggestion. smile.gif But that still leaves everything *except* the matrix stuff, assuming they can see locks and car parts and things (which we are assuming they can).

I'm not positive task spirits should even exist, as you suggested earlier.
Draco18s
QUOTE (Halinn @ Mar 26 2012, 06:27 PM) *
Runner's Companion, page 92, in the free spirit section:
QUOTE
Free Spirit Perception
Free Spirits on the physical plane are dual-natured beings. As with other dual-natured entities, a spirit’s ethereal senses are able to sense both worlds without incurring modifiers for acting on both planes at the same time. Note, however, that spirits are unable to see or interpret simsense, electronic projections on screens, or AR displays.



Wait.

Spirits can't watch silver screen movies either?

Well faux.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Mar 26 2012, 07:40 PM) *
Wait.

Spirits can't watch silver screen movies either?

Well faux.


That is not really an Electronic Projection on Screen. It is light passing through film onto a screen. Not the same process.
Glyph
The text of page 92 of Street Magic gives a bit more fluff on spirit senses. Basically, astral perception is their primary sense, like smell for a dog. "When observing an object, a spirit sees the auras and shadows first and the physical characteristics second. Physical details metahumans characterize as obvious are frequently overlooked entirely by spirits."

It would be like, if a dog summoned a human into the dog world and asked him to describe a bush. "Well, it's green, with some blue flowers on it." "Who cares? What does it smell like? Don't you freaky human things have a sense of smell?"


Personally, I am fine with task spirits being gimped with regards to technical tasks. I see them as more the Norse dwarven metal forgers, house fixing brownies, gardening gnomes, and such. It breaks the verisimilitude of having these quasi-alien creatures, not quite in synch with the material world itself, much less technology - and some of them can hack or repair complex electronic devices as well as the most gifted human can. Too much of a disconnect from everything else about spirits for my taste.

phlapjack77
QUOTE (Glyph @ Mar 27 2012, 10:24 AM) *
Personally, I am fine with task spirits being gimped with regards to technical tasks. I see them as more the Norse dwarven metal forgers, house fixing brownies, gardening gnomes, and such. It breaks the verisimilitude of having these quasi-alien creatures, not quite in synch with the material world itself, much less technology - and some of them can hack or repair complex electronic devices as well as the most gifted human can. Too much of a disconnect from everything else about spirits for my taste.

I agree with this. For Task spirits to be able to fully function in the "modern" world, they'll need an appropriate "translator", such as a host body from possession or inhabitation.
Draco18s
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Mar 26 2012, 08:57 PM) *
That is not really an Electronic Projection on Screen. It is light passing through film onto a screen. Not the same process.


?
Halinn
The only reason this argument even exists is theoretical. The only traditions to have access to task spirits are possession ones, and possessing spirits have quite explicit limits on what technology they can use (Street Magic page 102, quoted earlier in thread). An argument can be made that possessing spirits can see old fashioned screens, but that's some outdated drek you have to dig up, then.
phlapjack77
QUOTE (Halinn @ Mar 27 2012, 06:24 PM) *
The only reason this argument even exists is theoretical. The only traditions to have access to task spirits are possession ones, and possessing spirits have quite explicit limits on what technology they can use (Street Magic page 102, quoted earlier in thread). An argument can be made that possessing spirits can see old fashioned screens, but that's some outdated drek you have to dig up, then.

Not so sure this is purely theoretical - home-brewed traditions are totally allowed, meaning you could have materializing task spirits
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Mar 26 2012, 09:06 PM) *


So, are you saying that you would consider the technology of someone using a flashlight to shine the light through the film to show the image on the wall as an Electronic device? I sure would not. And that is precisely what a Film Projector does. There are no "Electronics" involved in processing the image. There are versions of such things that do electronic processing, yes, but at the basics, a Film projector does not do so (and yes, outdated it may be, but it is still functional technology).
Draco18s
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Mar 27 2012, 08:12 AM) *
So, are you saying that you would consider the technology of someone using a flashlight to shine the light through the film to show the image on the wall as an Electronic device? I sure would not. And that is precisely what a Film Projector does. There are no "Electronics" involved in processing the image. There are versions of such things that do electronic processing, yes, but at the basics, a Film projector does not do so (and yes, outdated it may be, but it is still functional technology).


Yet the two are functionally identical once the light leaves the camera.
But somehow the latter one produces a result which is effectively invisible to the spirit.
Halinn
My interpretation is that by "electronic projections on screens", they mean monitors like what we're using.
almost normal
QUOTE (Halinn @ Mar 27 2012, 10:32 AM) *
My interpretation is that by "electronic projections on screens", they mean monitors like what we're using.


Precisely. Electronics deal with circuits, diodes, tubes, etc. By definition, a lightbulb wouldn't be electronic. Most movies (I.E. All but nostalgically shown, like drive-ins) would be played in AR anyway, as would television. See the recent Horizon book for more on that.
Draco18s
QUOTE (almost normal @ Mar 27 2012, 09:39 AM) *
Precisely. Electronics deal with circuits, diodes, tubes, etc. By definition, a lightbulb wouldn't be electronic. Most movies (I.E. All but nostalgically shown, like drive-ins) would be played in AR anyway, as would television. See the recent Horizon book for more on that.


Given that television these days is in projected 3D... wink.gif
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Mar 27 2012, 09:20 AM) *
Given that television these days is in projected 3D... wink.gif


Not mine... That is just a fad. Not going to invest in it, personally. smile.gif
Besides, it produces massive headaches. Until they can remove that side-effect, it is just garbage as far as I am concerned.
Draco18s
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Mar 27 2012, 10:44 AM) *
Not mine... That is just a fad. Not going to invest in it, personally. smile.gif
Besides, it produces massive headaches. Until they can remove that side-effect, it is just garbage as far as I am concerned.


I meant ShadowRun's present day. wink.gif
Trideo.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Mar 27 2012, 09:58 AM) *
I meant ShadowRun's present day. wink.gif
Trideo.


Of course... smile.gif
Neraph
QUOTE (almost normal @ Mar 26 2012, 12:35 PM) *
Stop being ignorant. I clearly cited the .75 essence loss, but I'm sure your attention span couldn't handle more then one set of information at once.

Stop being heavy-handed and abrasive and reread what I said. I clearly corrected you on nuyen costs, not Essence costs, and the rest of me "crying like a baby" was addressing a legitimate question raised by someone else. Your namecalling was unwarranted and served no purpose.
phlapjack77
QUOTE (Neraph @ Mar 28 2012, 12:40 PM) *
Stop being heavy-handed and abrasive and reread what I said. I clearly corrected you on nuyen costs, not Essence costs, and the rest of me "crying like a baby" was addressing a legitimate question raised by someone else. Your namecalling was unwarranted and served no purpose.

No worries Neraph, he's been outed (by himself) as a troll. Don't give him another second thought.
Jhaiisiin
All the info about not being able to see various types of displays brings up a food for thought question:

How does Buttercup function in the 6th world?
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jhaiisiin @ Mar 28 2012, 02:54 PM) *
All the info about not being able to see various types of displays brings up a food for thought question:

How does Buttercup function in the 6th world?


Hardcopy...
Jhaiisiin
Doesn't the fluff say that spirits can't read signs either?
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jhaiisiin @ Mar 28 2012, 03:03 PM) *
Doesn't the fluff say that spirits can't read signs either?


Nope...
Some People here believe that that is how it SHOULD be, but it is not. By RAW, they cannot perceive Electronic Output, nor AR.
In fact, the fluff says they can read just fine. After all, Buttercup is an Avid Comic Book fan.
Jhaiisiin
K, thought I remembered fluff about signs and everything else being a problem. Almost as if their "eyes" weren't capable of focusing on things enough (which of course might be corrected with glasses.... hehe)
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jhaiisiin @ Mar 28 2012, 03:18 PM) *
K, thought I remembered fluff about signs and everything else being a problem. Almost as if their "eyes" weren't capable of focusing on things enough (which of course might be corrected with glasses.... hehe)


Signs and such are a problem FROM ASTRAL SPACE (Even for Mages Projecting). You cannot read them with Astral Sight or Assensing. That is mentioned in 4th Edition, somewhere. Unfortunately, it is not mentioned, mechanically, whether Spirits have normal Senses when Matterialized. I believe they do based upon all the fluff over the years. Other's disagree. Mostly because it de-powers spirits if they do not. And in their opinion, anything that de-powers spirits is a good thing. smile.gif
Halinn
There's some text about the level of detail when astrally perceiving in SR4A, and a mention that if one has the astral form critter power, one is astrally perceiving. Nothing definitively conclusive either way, though.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012