See, if you had said this at the start, that might have been it. But that you felt the need to post so many references at first, it seems you felt it's not actually so clear. Wouldn't it be simpler if there were one sentence in the rulebook saying this?
The flying thing, come on. I'll pretend you didn't bring this silliness up. I agree with you about rules not always having to be explicit, it's even part of my sig. Really obvious things, like your flying or Damage overflow example, I agree those don't need explicit rules. But I think this IP part isn't so obvious and could use some explicit rules.
As for your EDIT EDIT, I actually agree with you here, and I agree this section of the rules could also use some refinement in editing and clarification.
The flying thing, come on. I'll pretend you didn't bring this silliness up. I agree with you about rules not always having to be explicit, it's even part of my sig. Really obvious things, like your flying or Damage overflow example, I agree those don't need explicit rules. But I think this IP part isn't so obvious and could use some explicit rules.
As for your EDIT EDIT, I actually agree with you here, and I agree this section of the rules could also use some refinement in editing and clarification.
so because he went the extra mile to kill it extra dead, it must have been nearly impossible to prove otherwise?
what the hell kind of logic do they have where you live, exactly?
why would the rulebook have a sentence about this specifically? can you show me a sentence anywhere that tells me that agility or body or intuition increases stack?