QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 14 2013, 12:46 AM)

The irony is that magic has clear limits on what it can hypothetically do, in addition to drain and any other limitations the user may face. Nanites don't
Well, since they are both fiction, it largely depends on the writing. And it's the same as with this next point:
QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 14 2013, 12:46 AM)

He has a point in the former, but it does not matter since unfortunately the latter is untrue: Nanites are a one-time investment (since they do not actually degrade unless exposed to the immune system) and if they ever break, oh well, buy some cheap stuff which does roughly the same and reprogram them...
You can address the problems with rebalancing. (I leave it to Fatum to address the price issue, if he wants to.)
QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 14 2013, 12:46 AM)

I think it was in some Tom Clancy novel (I sometimes feel the need to read dumb stuff for the dumbness of it, don't ask) that had the appropriate comparison: "That's like calling gang rape a minor social deviation".
Nah, it's like calling gang rape deviant behaviour. Which it totally is.
QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 14 2013, 12:46 AM)

Assuming the worst possible interpretation you get the worst possible outcome. Who would have thought?
I don't think mine is the worst possible interpretation. That would be something like, you cannot do cybersurgery at all and anything but the most basic maintenance of augmentations is impossible. But we have been over this.