Impact
Nov 15 2004, 04:07 AM
As far as target market - the Honda Viking was specifically marketed to trolls and orks. There is a market, and with the tech available in SR, small production runs are easy and nearly as profitable.
Lindt
Nov 15 2004, 06:08 AM
QUOTE (Stumps @ Nov 13 2004, 04:52 PM) |
A .3006 in pistol form, in the hands of a Troll, pressed firmly against the temple of the Rigger's temple and the orders, "Drive!" put a whole new meaning to the phrase "Palm Pilot". |
Thank you, oh great maker of puns!
But seriously folks, if you really want to go the 1 shot kill route, just get a FMJ .10 guage shotgun. Only, what, a .82" shell? Really big holes? Or say screw the 'man-portable' crap, and get a crew serviced 37mm cannon.
Kagetenshi
Nov 15 2004, 06:11 AM
Doesn't Siege have a lock on that title?
~J
Arethusa
Nov 15 2004, 06:35 AM
Why stop at 10? Kid I know has an 8 gauge he got from his grandfather, made in the good ol' days before 12 became the popular American standard.
[edit]
There's seriously no limit to how ludicrous you make this. Big Troll Guns is essentially a font from which no limit of stupid firearms ideas can flow. So bring on the 8 gauge revolvers and
.50 AE SMGs (or
.50 Beowulf, as I'm sure Raygun'll jump in and link that if I don't).
mfb
Nov 15 2004, 06:40 AM
impact, there's a pretty big difference between something perfectly legal and commonly-purchased, like motorcycles, and something illegal and rarely-sold, like an assault cannon.
Raygun
Nov 15 2004, 06:50 AM
QUOTE (Lindt) |
But seriously folks, if you really want to go the 1 shot kill route, just get a FMJ .10 guage shotgun. Only, what, a .82" shell? |
.775". 19.68mm.
Because of the way shotguns work, you may have to be a bit closer than you'd want in order to hit what you're aiming at (smoothbore and all). And, while there currently isn't any kind of FMJ bullet load made for any kind of shotgun shell (as far as I'm aware), I guess there certainly could be, but it would likely involve a sabot load to a smaller caliber. It might even be possible to load a 10 gauge shell (or even 3.5" 12 gauge magnums) with .50 HEIAP bullets.
QUOTE (mfb) |
impact, there's a pretty big difference between something perfectly legal and commonly-purchased, like motorcycles, and something illegal and rarely-sold, like an assault cannon. |
mfb, I'm with you, man. But you're paddling upstream. Once you get into the Big Guns For Trolls discussion, it's pretty much time to abandon all practicality. The current gets rediculous. These days I find it's better to grab a tube and a cooler full of beer and just float downstream, detached and content. But maybe that's just me.
mfb
Nov 15 2004, 07:05 AM
*sigh* yeah.
DrJest
Nov 15 2004, 09:01 AM
QUOTE |
There's seriously no limit to how ludicrous you make this. Big Troll Guns is essentially a font from which no limit of stupid firearms ideas can flow. So bring on the 8 gauge revolvers and .50 AE SMGs (or .50 Beowulf, as I'm sure Raygun'll jump in and link that if I don't). |
Oh my God in Heaven... I thought those links would be to SR fansite guns... people are actually manufacturing .50 automatic rifles and boasting about how light they are... come on, resident experts, can you tell me about the frickin' recoil on one of those! How the hell would you keep it on target? It's got to be some kind of uber-testosteronal thing, right?
Crusher Bob
Nov 15 2004, 09:51 AM
As long as the gun is gas operated and you are firing in single shot, the recoil shouldn't be too bad, though the AR-15 platform may be a bit too light... The recoil will probably be somewhat 'mushy' (like a gas operated shotgun) as compared to the 'crisp' recoil you get with say... a bolt action rifle. This will very slightly reduce the speed of folloy up shots, but its not something a games rules would notice.
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 10:41 AM
QUOTE (DrJest) |
people are actually manufacturing .50 automatic rifles and boasting about how light they are... come on, resident experts, can you tell me about the frickin' recoil on one of those! |
I think maybe the ".50" in the caliber is what got you?
.50 Beowulf Entry Rifle:
Gun Weight: 8lbs (I could not find a single site that said how much the thing actually weighs, 7.5-8lbs is my best guess)
Bullet Weight: 400gr
Muzzle Velocity: 1800fps
Powder Weight: 38gr
Recoil Energy: 27.9 ft-lbs @ 15fps
For comparison,
M16A2 (5.56x45mm M855):
Gun Weight: 7lbs
Bullet Weight: 62gr
Muzzle Velocity: 3025fps
Powder Weight: 26.1gr
Recoil Energy: 4.8 ft-lbs @ 6.6fps
M14 (7.62x51mm M59):
Gun Weight: 11lbs
Bullet Weight: 150.5gr
Muzzle Velocity: 2750fps
Powder Weight: 46gr
Recoil Energy: 11.6 ft-lbs @ 8.3fps
Lapua TRG 42 (8.6x70mm):
Gun Weight: 11lbs
Bullet Weight: 250gr
Muzzle Velocity: 2990fps
Powder Weight: 91.8gr
Recoil Energy: 43.4 ft-lbs @ 15.9fps
Barrett M82A1 (12.7x99mm Mk 211 Mod 0):
Gun Weight: 28.5lbs
Bullet Weight: 671gr
Muzzle Velocity: 2910fps
Powder Weight: 233gr
Recoil Energy: 109.6 ft-lbs @ 15.7fps
You're definitely going to notice the recoil, but it's not uncontrollable or punishing.
Stumps
Nov 15 2004, 11:00 AM
Hey wait...an M16A2 is not a good comparison to a .50.
There is absolutely no kick to an M16A2.
You can fire that thing LITERALLY off of your crotch and not get hurt.
Unless your point was to show how much recoil that .50 has in comparison to a weapon that practically has none.
DrJest
Nov 15 2004, 11:09 AM
You're right, the .50 bit was what got me (I freely admit my ignorance of firearms). So in real terms the recoil wouldn't be too bad in single shot. Now, normally I'd assume that (although they market them in autofire models) firing on burst or auto would be a lot worse, but since I cocked up on the original assumption I'll turn it back over to AE and ask for his opinion
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 11:23 AM
QUOTE (Stumps) |
Hey wait...an M16A2 is not a good comparison to a .50. |
Looking at the numbers, neither is an M82A1. If you pay attention to the Recoil Energy figures, you'll notice a nice progression there (M16A2 4.8 ft-lbs, M14 11.6 ft-lbs, .50 Beowulf 27.9 ft-lbs, TRG 42 43.4 ft-lbs, M82A1 109.6 ft-lbs). The point is to show in general terms where the .50 Beowulf and similar guns fall on this scale.
QUOTE (DrJest) |
Now, normally I'd assume that (although they market them in autofire models) firing on burst or auto would be a lot worse |
Yes, it absolutely would, at least for controllability -- it might not be any more painful. None of these guns (.50 Beowulf, .458 SOCOM, .499 Leitner-Wise, etc) seem to be marketed with burst or fully automatic trigger groups, though; or should there have been a "don't" in "although they market [...]"? The M14 at less than half the recoil energy is often considered pretty useless on fully automatic because it's too difficult to control.
DrJest
Nov 15 2004, 11:34 AM
Ultra-Light 50AE Sledgehammer - click on the .50AE rifle link at the side. "Our first 50AE Sledgehammers have fired over 1000 rounds at FULL AUTO with NO CLEANING! and NO MALFUNCTIONS! " they say boastfully. ?!?!?!?!?!
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 11:46 AM
That site is obviously all about the über-testosteronal bullshit. They seem to have a hell of a lot to compensate for.
QUOTE (TROMIX Lead Delivery Systems) |
For the Licensed Class 3 customers we can also outfit your upper with a full auto bolt carrier for some really fast, out of control, senselessness at the plinking range. If you can’t handle it, there is probably some good TV you can watch on the Lifetime network. |
That said, neither the .50 AE nor the .440 Cor-Bon are as powerful as the .50 Beowulf, so it's not quite as bad as it sounds.
Ultra-Light .50 AE Sledgehammer:
Gun Weight: 5.5lbs
Bullet Weight: 325gr
Muzzle Velocity: 1550fps (1400fps out of a 6" barrel, that looks about right for the ~16" barrel of this gun with propellants meant for pistols)
Powder Weight: 27gr
Recoil Energy: 19.2 ft-lbs @ 15fps
And the .458 is quite a bit worse, about the same as the .50 Beowulf. Completely useless in a combat situation, but I guess it's good enough for a few giggles at a junk yard.
DrJest
Nov 15 2004, 11:53 AM
Nice to know I haven't gone competely nuts
Of course get an IGV-IV, shock pads, and a big butch troll (to bring this back on-topic) and who knows?
Botch
Nov 15 2004, 11:56 AM
Hey, hey, away for a few days and the Troll gun debate is on again! My personal feelings on BFTG's is that they should exist and that they shouldn't destroy game balance.
All you have to do is look at what guns trolls use. FMPE trolls only start using guns at shotgun power level and proceed on up, so a .500 Alaskan rimless rifle round used in a SA-pistol frame is not really game destroying. Give trolls their own guns, but limit the ammo. If you say that the .500 calibur troll pistol can be picked up under a hunting licence, make it illegal to own any AP, HE, etc ammo for it as they would never be used for hunting. If the player insists on ADPS for it, make them make it themselves or try to locate avail. 18 ammo.
Trolls get shafted in SR, just look at the amount of source material for elves, humans and orcs. Trolls get ONE item and a few paragraphs in the old Germany Sourcebook. For a race that must customise almost every item they own, there must be at least one company that caters to the projected 278 million trolls living 2064; there isn't yet. From memory there isn't even a picture for Fomorians in CC and in Tir Na Nog the artwork for the Fomorian Wastes has doozies not fomorians.
Besides, a troll with jacked up strength using a Ranger-X bow can dish out more damage at a longer range than some SR sniper rifles.
Stumps
Nov 15 2004, 12:08 PM
Kinda what I was thinking.
I don't think it's unbalanced because if you don't give them their own handguns, what else are they going to use?
Big rifles and machine guns or cannons.
Hell, if anything, giving them their own handguns might balance things more.
Pistols can't shoot long range like machineguns can, and they're surely not a cannon, but get close enough and it'll be like they normally are at longer ranges now.
DrJest
Nov 15 2004, 01:20 PM
"Did you know armour-piercing rounds are legal for hunting? What is there, some big-ass deer wearing a kevlar vest out there? 'I'm ready for your ass!' "
- Robin Williams
lorthazar
Nov 15 2004, 05:01 PM
Well I am working on a slight change to the Cannon Companion fire arm creation rules. Since theoretically and caliber can be made into any type of gun I am going to add a seperate part of the creation calling for ammo size. now there is some restrictions on more powerful ammo, but only becuase they could not logically fit in some type of firearms. This will also allow players to customise there guns that already exist.
Example: Player A loves his Are Alpha Combat Gun, but lately he has been forced to snipe at heavily armored people with it. It's not the best weapon for that particular job being 8M. I as GM rule that it uses 5.56N ammo. Well he spend a bunch of cash and some time getting new barrel made, stronger springs, and some stronger fireing mechanisms. Voila he now has a Ares Alpha Combat gun that fires .375H&H Magnum for a whopping 10S.
Example 2: player B needs a real hand cannon. Lately his ruger super warhawk has not been cutting it. So he takes it to his gunsmith and asks for the most powerful handgun cartridge in the world. A few days later he has a completely reworked 5 shot revolver that fires .475 linebaugh for 12S
Example 3: player C wants an easily supressed assault rifle. He isn't worried about power becuase all he wants this for is surprise encounters with unarmored combatants. (He hunts devil rats in his spare time) So he rechambers his Colt M23 for .22 Long Rifle (5M damage).
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 05:27 PM
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
Voila he now has a Ares Alpha Combat gun that fires .375H&H Magnum for a whopping 10S. |
Ouch. I hope you include double recoil modifiers for that.
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
So he takes it to his gunsmith and asks for the most powerful handgun cartridge in the world. A few days later he has a completely reworked 5 shot revolver that fires .475 linebaugh for 12S |
I think we discussed this before, but it bears repeating that the .475 Linebaugh is
not the most powerful handgun cartridge in the world, and 12S is possibly not a very reasonable Damage Code for it in any case -- not compared to a .375 H&H at 10S at any rate.
Typical performance for a .475 Linebaugh out of a 7.5" barrel is a 400gr bullet at 1424fps for 1802 ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle. From the chamberings offered for the
BFR alone, at least the .450 Marlin and the .500 S&W are significantly more powerful -- the latter is also generally agreed to be the most powerful handgun caliber available for production handguns, and is capable of pushing a 440gr bullet out of the 7.5" barrel at 1671fps for 2729 ft-lbs of energy.
The .375 H&H, in contrast, can propel 300gr bullets at 2645fps for 4662 ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle from a 24" barrel. With the right ammunition, this will outperform any of the above handgun cartridges by far in putting down any kind of critter (gun handling not withstanding).
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
Well I am working on a slight change to the Cannon Companion fire arm creation rules. Since theoretically and caliber can be made into any type of gun I am going to add a seperate part of the creation calling for ammo size. |
You might want to check the
FCG by Spudman (Peter Millholland), for inspiration if nothing else.
hyzmarca
Nov 15 2004, 05:35 PM
No, no, the most powerful andgun cartrige in the world is 5.56mm NATO. You just have to have some very good flare compensation if you want to use it without going blind.
http://www.gunblast.com/Bushmaster-Pistol.htm
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 05:44 PM
Yeah, if you equate a huge muzzle flash with power then the 5.56x45mm NATO is certainly more powerful in a handgun than the .500 S&W.
Firing a 55gr bullet at somewhere around 2500fps out of a 7-1/4" barrel, this doesn't generate more than around 750-800 ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle. Additionally, since the velocity is so low, FMJ bullets will not fragment and you've basically got .22 UltraMagnum. The only advantage this has is against armored targets, the wound cavity will be very, very small. I'd rather take a .41 Magnum, thank you very much.
lorthazar
Nov 15 2004, 05:48 PM
Actually, the .475 Linebuagh hold the record for deepest penetration shot on an elepant from a hand gun at 42 inches through it's skull, brain and spinal column. This was the only shot that was fired on the rogue elephant and it was killed instantly. Even some .600NE rounds have not made it that deep. Plus despite all it's power the round still has managable recoil. There are actually revolvers made for it today with 4" barrels that have the same performance as the 7.5" barrel AE mentioned. Now I don't know about you but anything over a 5" barrel is begining to be a rifle. I feel justified in a 12S at heavy pistol ranges becuase his will make a god awful hole.
As for the .375 H&H, I went off the lightest facory loads availabe which are sure not in the 4663 ft lb range. mainly becuase he wants a gun left. Also it will still able to be fired on full automatic. I thought since he wanted only a little extra power that was a good route. Especially since he will be using it with steel core rounds instead of hollow points. Smaller holes in the body due to lack of expansion thus easier to live through. Now if he had told me he want full power rounds it would 14S like any normal Sniper round, And it would cost him so much more. (By the way the modifications eliminated the recoil comp of the gun which i feel is a fair trade on recoil for an ork)
lorthazar
Nov 15 2004, 06:02 PM
By the way I do feel surprised no one said a thing about the cut down assault rifle. Either everyone thought that so moronic it deserved no mention, did see the merit, or were to blinded by the power guns.
Austere Emancipator
Nov 15 2004, 06:46 PM
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
Actually, the .475 Linebuagh hold the record for deepest penetration shot on an elepant from a hand gun at 42 inches through it's skull, brain and spinal column. This was the only shot that was fired on the rogue elephant and it was killed instantly. Even some .600NE rounds have not made it that deep. |
That just comes down to the particular load used. The sectional densities of a 400gr .475 and a 440gr .500 are practically equal (0.253 vs 0.251), and with easily 1.5x the energy of the .475 Linebaugh the .500 S&W should penetrate noticeably deeper with similar bullets -- as long as the bullet is tough enough. Either that was a very, very lucky shot with the .475 Linebaugh (most likely) or the bullet happened to be a rather pointy solid.
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
I feel justified in a 12S at heavy pistol ranges becuase his will make a god awful hole. |
No doubt about that, it will make a big hole. And a .500 S&W will make a bigger hole. A .375 H&H would make a much bigger hole still with the right ammunition, but low-power armor piercing rounds will indeed suck for that. Too bad there are no common rimless, non-belted .300 magnums, since those would seem far better suited for that kind of job.
lorthazar
Nov 15 2004, 06:52 PM
Well considering that the moment caseless ammo becomes a more accepted prostpect I have no doubt you will see caseless versions of all ammo types. That means there could be tons of strange weaponry out there.
Although my favorite for the too ridiculous to let into the campaign has to be the gatling shotgun. I don't mind a FA shotgun but there is a line.
Lindt
Nov 15 2004, 07:03 PM
PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL! PULL!
Arethusa
Nov 15 2004, 08:16 PM
I'd allow it. Assuming realistic mechanics, you can have all the fun you want with a gun that combines all the disadvantages of a heavy, cumbersome, and thoroughly unsubtle minigun with the short range and lack of penetration of a shotgun. If you stick with SR's Hand-of-God shotguns, well, who cares?
Wounded Ronin
Nov 15 2004, 09:02 PM
QUOTE (Stumps) |
Actually, DrJest is more correct.
The FBI runs on a training that states a standard of firing at least 3 rounds and assuming for 7 rounds to bring a person down.
3 rounds will be garanteed to be fired, and they are trained to fire no less. 7 ronds is what they expect it to take to make the person actually stop attacking and hopefully drop to the ground.
The guy that was being talked to (I can't remember his place in the FBI) was saying that he's seen people run after getting shot 10 times in the chest and back, and that wasn't something that appeared as too rare for him to see. But the idea of one shot, one kill, he was saying, is completely fabricated hollywood/tv myth.
He was saying that if anything, after one shot, the person will often times stand in shock if they don't keep going at what they were doing. Adrenalin is a bitch of an enemy.
All these people will probably die later very easily if not medically treated, but in combat they remain completely functional unless you pack in alot of ammo very quickly so their system can't over-ride the shock with more adrenalin.
And god help you if they're on hiped up drugs. Then you just keep firing until they drop. There's a good reason that weapons come with more than one round in them. |
Remember that fat lawyer who was shot several times with a .38 but just kept fleeing like a fat unbalanced champ.
Raygun
Nov 15 2004, 09:16 PM
I got my hands on a .50 Beowulf last month. The guy I buy a lot of my guns from sells them. He says he's had a couple of guys take them off to Afghanistan, as they supposedly work very well for clearing out caves and other CQB. The big bullets make more of an impression, apparently.
It does kick like a fucking mule, up there with some 12 gauge 3" magnum loads. Easily twice as bad as an M1A, and the ammo costs three times as much. I had enough after one mag (ten rounds). Not a hiccup though, and it's reasonably accurate at 100 meters.
QUOTE (lorthazar) |
Well considering that the moment caseless ammo becomes a more accepted prostpect I have no doubt you will see caseless versions of all ammo types. |
The problem is that caseless ammunition won't ever become that widely accepted. There are advantages to cased ammunition that most people don't recognize, mainly the fact that it's modular and can be reloaded, and keeps the cost of a firearm down, as the case itself performs the act of sealing the breech. Reloading is not something militaries care about, so they may find caseless to be a more viable option. But it's something civilians tend to like to have the option to do.
lorthazar
Nov 15 2004, 09:24 PM
Actually considering the curve of technology I don't imagine it will be long before some figures out how to make a home reloader for caseless ammunition. all you would need to do then is cast your own bullets, get the explosive-binder mix the way you want it and voila caseless ammo. Now considering that the world of SR is from 45 to 60 years away, depending on your start date, it would not be unreasonable to assume someone had done it by then. Witness the ammo fabrication rules in Cannon Companion. Now some politicians would laud this as there would be no way to effectively hide ammon from chemsniffers of trained hounds. Unless you did a lot of work.
Toptomcat
Nov 15 2004, 10:13 PM
Putting it in a Ziploc or three, rinsing the Ziploc and your hands, and putting it in with a case of perfume/spices doesn't seem like too much work to me...
Raygun
Nov 15 2004, 10:25 PM
*floats downstream, raises a beer with one hand, waves with the other*
Stumps
Nov 16 2004, 12:28 AM
*runs away before the thread blows up from experimentation*
Lindt
Nov 16 2004, 05:16 AM
lorthazar, ya killed it. Enjoy the beer Ray
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.