Fortune
Nov 19 2004, 03:51 AM
Officially, I believe it's no more than 5 Edges and 5 Flaws, with the difference in Build Points not exceeding 6 points either way.
BitBasher
Nov 19 2004, 04:55 PM
| QUOTE (Fortune) |
| Officially, I believe it's no more than 5 Edges and 5 Flaws, with the difference in Build Points not exceeding 6 points either way. |
I'm pretty sure that's right.
ES_Riddle
Nov 19 2004, 07:58 PM
If they intended 6 as the limiting number of build points rather than the difference, then they wouldn't have ambidexterity go up to 8.
Ol' Scratch
Nov 19 2004, 08:04 PM
It's amazing how when you point things like that out to those who firmly believe it's a +6/-6 limit, they just say something along the lines of "exactly, that's why no one can have Ambidexterity 4." Such baffling logic.
Shockwave_IIc
Nov 19 2004, 09:04 PM
| QUOTE (ES_Riddle) |
| If they intended 6 as the limiting number of build points rather than the difference, then they wouldn't have ambidexterity go up to 8. |
just means you have to take a 2pt flaw so that the difference is only 6 not 8.
So yes as the only Merit/Flaw you cannot have Ambidex 8
ES_Riddle
Nov 20 2004, 05:31 AM
| QUOTE (Shockwave_IIc) |
| QUOTE (ES_Riddle @ Nov 19 2004, 07:58 PM) | | If they intended 6 as the limiting number of build points rather than the difference, then they wouldn't have ambidexterity go up to 8. |
just means you have to take a 2pt flaw so that the difference is only 6 not 8.
So yes as the only Merit/Flaw you cannot have Ambidex 8
|
That's what I meant, sorry if I was unclear. I was intending it as solid evidence that the 6 point limit is for 6 net points.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.