Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: AGS - good or bad?
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2
Grinder
In thread about the upcoming Shadows of... books we become way off topic and ranted about the imo shitty german setting. I started this thread so we can all discuss our opinons about the allied german states.

Personally, i don't like the setting much. Mainly i dislike:

- the awakening of the anarchist movement. It's not nearly as strong as the authors wanted it to be. Neither today nor will it in 2060. And it's presented in such a naive and nerdy manner, that i can only sadly shake my head about it.

- the different settings: i have the impression that the authors tried to put all the different countries North America has to offer in SR into germany - and completly failed. Germany is too small to split up in a balkan-fashion, with new monarchies, an elven country and even a church-run state.

I vote for a drastic change in the german setting. As i said in the other thread, a new unifying dictatorship would be a reasonable variant (in sr, NOT in real life, please don't get me wrong on that) and not backed by a great dragon or immortal elf.
hermit
QUOTE
- the awakening of the anarchist movement. It's not nearly as strong as the authors wanted it to be. Neither today nor will it in 2060. And it's presented in such a naive and nerdy manner, that i can only sadly shake my head about it.

The Authors apparently lack any understanding of what a city in true anarchy is like. Take Berlin, for pete's sake. Not only do they present the most horrendous explanation for how a city of five million can exist both under siege, isolated, and not degenerate into Mogadishu-esque war zone despite the fact that there're militias present that wouldn't look out of place in Liberia (though none really can compare with the crazyness of the Butt Naked brigade; thier imagination apparently lacked for that). No, they also make Berlin - a defunct, anarchic city where every Horst and his brother wield Panthers and Valiants, maniac militias roam the street, and havoc is a fact of daily life a prime investment place! Hello? Is Somalia the nation with Africa's strongest growth rates? No? Why not? Maybe because investors fucking don't want their investment been blown up by some crackhead lunatic, maybe?
And not only do all megacorps open shop there, noooo ... they also start building arcologies! Not that this would be a really dead investment, mind you, and not that this would cost them very dearly in terms of security. And it's not like arcologies are damn expensive, and would maybe, just maybe make more sense in a place where they can expect t not be fired at with heavy artillery on a daily basis.

Also, while we're at it: Proteus. Renraku paid through the nose for one (1) Arcology in Seattle. Proteus, a second-tier who, countrary to Renraku, is active only in niche markets like "contractors" and environmental adaption by means of genetech, apparently has the money to build five (5) of these things, or rather, pull them out of their ass. and no, that's not enough - they also have to build a space port, and not produce anything valid in their arcoloies! All they do is crazy genetech unethical shit. Very rewarding! The business modfel of the future! Do expensive stuff that will never pay and make you look like assholes! Way to go Proteus!

QUOTE
- the different settings: I have the impression that the authors tried to put all the different countries North America has to offer in SR into germany - and completly failed. Germany is too small to split up in a balkan-fashion, with new monarchies, an elven country and even a church-run state.

I second that too. Germany is a small nation, at least in terms of territory. Splitting it um into bits the size of a third of LA and calling these bits 'nations' just doesn't fly. Not to menton that I never grasped how the hell all these crazed monarchies came to be, or why the HELL metahumans seem to prefer quasi-fascist monarchies to some variant of democracy or a good old fashioned secular dictatorship.

And none of these meta countries is anyway near valid. Pomorya is such a cheap Tir ripoff, it makes me yelp in pain just to read the chapter on it. The Troll kingdom is a somawhat nice idea, but terribly executed (and, of COURSE, dragon-backed, because it would be economically invalid otherwise. Like all dragons like to back poor downtrodden metas, right? Especially those who have nothing even remotely of interest to them. The dwarf kingdom? Pardon me, this si Shadowrun, not high fantasy!

And lastly, the Wesphalia theocracy. Honestly, I cannot believe this was written by Germans. DidS really sounds like someone form abroad who knows Germany only through an travel guide and a "history of Europe for dummies" booklet he stole from grade school.

Of all countries I know, Germany is possibly the least religious. Granted, the West is a bit less atheist than the East, but overall, it is almost devoid of any religion in peoples' daily lives. America is faaar more religious. Italy certainly is. Even France is! And Those people afre supposed to just set up a theocracy, perhaps the least likely governmental system in that country? Please.

And Saxony, a *monarchy*? Come on. This state is *RED*. Granted, it's run by conservatives, but that's more of a habit. The whole east really swallowed many communist ideals, and one of these is a despising of monarchy. Dueling culture? Puffy nobles? Hello???

QUOTE
I vote for a drastic change in the german setting. As i said in the other thread, a new unifying dictatorship would be a reasonable variant (in sr, NOT in real life, please don't get me wrong on that) and not backed by a great dragon or immortal elf.

Yeap. This is dark future after all, so it should be some sort of dictatorship. And NO FUCKING MONARCHY. Monarchy is so fucking lame. I'd like a military coup, mass executions of useless nobles and Pomorya and Proteus quietly vanishing to the depths of the trash can on the editor's desktop, or at least collapsing.

Now that I vented my main qualms about the AGS, I'd like to offer something like a solution to that mess:

- the theorcracy is overthrown following one or the other bad deed of the GCC (maybe they're all possessed by Shedim?), and the Bundeswehr takes over, sponsored ny most major companies, who really have had enough of these sausage-eating medieval-minded, anti-cyberware dumbasses.
- Berlin's remaining anarchists die of a major plague. Proteus is blamed for using biological weapons against the contained zone. The "liberated" anarchist containment zone is cleansed and developed by Saeder-Krupp, who sets up a bunch of SmogWerk ultry spoil factories of environmental doom there. Some surviving anarchists retreat into abandoned bunkers and tunnels and subway lines and form an anarchist underground there.
- One of Proteus' arcoloies is hit by a natural disaster (or internal gene freak revolt), and the freaks they bred in there come running (swimming, crawling, waggling) out, causing a scandal that makes the '51 Marseilles scandal or the London genetech scandal look like minor medical malpractice in comparison. Proteus is dragged before the corporate court, dissolved, and it's assets divided up between the German federal government (who get their Berlin sector), and all megas and major Eurocorps (who get the research, arcologies, survivng staff, space port, and whatever else Proteus was hiding to play with it themselves).
- Pomorya suffers a revolution from those polish elves that came pouring in (who are evidently backed by Immortals, who can, for once, really do something that makes the reader happy). The UN sends peacekeepers (mainly donated by the Tirs and Scandinavia) to get things back under control, but cannot keep the nobles there from being lynched by angry polish elves. Then, after soem months of calm, the UN moves out, and either the German gvernment takes over, or some corp does. Or Scandinavia takes it; it'd surely be for the better of Pomorya.
- The ruling anarchist party collapses due to the fact that anarchist cannot remain organised by definition. The following political chaos, also known as "year of 20 chancellors", is marked by steadily shifting coalitions between totally clueless parties, and abruptly ended by the German military, backed by several other European govenments, corps, and Japan, taking over the show, relocating the capital to, Karlsruhe (their HQ city), and some iron-fisten Junta taking over. Anarchist revolts are quickly qualled, and most Germans are happy that, because FINALLY; there's order again, and noone would pee on the lawn no more. Remember, it's still Germany.

The above is just a bunch of random ideas really, that came to me after reading (most of) DidS2. It's not ideal, but I think combines what is there with the will to make the setting a bit less ludicrous.
MYST1C
QUOTE (Grinder)
Personally, i don't like the setting much.

There are details I don't like but tha AGS in general is OK to me.

QUOTE (Grinder)
- the awakening of the anarchist movement.

DidS was written in a time when FASA released books like "Neo-Anarchists' Guide to Real Life" or "Neo-Anarchists' Guide to North America"...

QUOTE (Grinder)
Germany is too small to split up in a balkan-fashion
.
True.
But I (and other players I know) have always treated the AGS more or less as a successor to the FRG just with more power in the hands of the state governments, not a bunch of really independent mini-nations.
hermit
QUOTE
DidS was written in a time when FASA released books like "Neo-Anarchists' Guide to Real Life" or "Neo-Anarchists' Guide to North America"...

Well yeah, but they REALLY overdid it. I mean, in that phase of SR, neo-anarchists were pretty much like ATTAC is today - a fringe group noone really took seriously, and who neither hdad the influence nor the will to mess with politics. The Anarchist party n Germany is quite the opposite. And it remains that Berlin was WAAAAAY out of line.

QUOTE
But I (and other players I know) have always treated the AGS more or less as a successor to the FRG just with more power in the hands of the state governments, not a bunch of really independent mini-nations.

Sure, you can house-rule that. It's not that half of these countries would be better suited for Aventurien ....
MYST1C
QUOTE (hermit)
The Anarchist party n Germany is quite the opposite.

As DidS describes it (I don't have Brennpunkt: ADL so I don't know if that has been clarified/updated) the ASU is just a spokesperson comitee for various independent groups, not a real political party.

QUOTE (hermit)
And it remains that Berlin was WAAAAAY out of line.

Granted, even though it seems a lot of people like this lawless crazy-as-possible city.
And it was (to some extend) fixed back in '96 with "Chrom & Dioxin" - by the same authors/developers!
Seems with some years passed by they noticed how weird some of their stuff had been.

QUOTE (hermit)
Sure, you can house-rule that. It's not that half of these countries would be better suited for Aventurien ....

Actually, the only thing that doesn't sit right with me is Westphalia. Sure, the awakening brought a new level of spirituality and religiosity, Germans at large are conservative and somewhat xenophobic - but a church-state so radical it split from the Vatican?

The other states?
Badisch-Pfalz: Their little civil war is a bit silly, but otherwise OK.
Brandenburg: OK
Saxony: A military dictatorship disguised as pseudo-monarchy. OK to me
Franconia: A little bit too much heile Welt for my taste, but at least with shadows.
Bavaria: Cosmopolitan Munich opposite xenophobic and barely understandable rural population. OK.
Thuringia: OK. I don't like the "hippy-state" thing but that was only shadowtalk.
Hesse-Nassau: OK.
Nordrhine-Ruhr: OK. Most SR campaigns I've played were set there. The 20 million Rhine-Ruhr plex is what Seattle was supposed to be - a giant sprawl, crowded with people.
NGL: OK. As it is actually discussed today to unite the Northern states...
Württemberg: OK.
Troll Kingdom: A country born from a resistance movement of an oppressed minority. A charismatic man who leads them in war and later declares himself king. Why not? The area is too sparsely populated and the people have other concers than politics - so why democracy?
Pomorya: The mini-Tir, complete with racism and nature worshipping. At the same time small, powerless and unimportant. I can live with that.
Westrhine-Luxembourg: A Switzerland-style direct democracy, just with a hereditary monarch, founded by Luxembourgian refugees (hence the monarch). The duke happens to be a dwarf which attracts other dwarfs to settle in the new state. Humans are only the second biggest race group. OK to me.
Berlin: OK to me. Those who want can set campaigns in the anarchist part.
Frankfurt: All glitzy corporate finance city (and 2 million citizens more than Seattle). OK.
Hamburg: Well, there are these geography problems concerning flooding and real-world area elevation - but nevertheless an interesting setting. OK.
hermit
QUOTE
As DidS describes it (I don't have Brennpunkt: ADL so I don't know if that has been clarified/updated) the ASU is just a spokesperson comitee for various independent groups, not a real political party.

Well, all the less likely that they could be effectively governed (or have any chance at being elected).

Badisch-Pfalz: The civil war is quite stupid, but the land is bearable.
Brandenburg: I agree, OK
Saxony: The whole monarchy thing is just stupid. This isn't the Liebliche Feld, after all. nyahnyah.gif
Franconia: I agree, it's kinda alright; one of the more believable states.
Bavaria: Also, OK, though I'd have liked it a little less rural.
Thuringia: Not really much is known of it, for all I know, but what is is barely alright.
Hesse-Nassau: Boring, but alright. Not every region needs (or can logically have) deep shadows.
Nordrhine-Ruhr: Best part of the AGS. Only part, except for the North German League I enjoyed reading about.
NGL: I kinda like it, though the pollution was a bit overblown, but meh, it is in all of SR.
Württemberg: OK.
Troll Kingdom: It is not viable economically, it is unbelievable the Trolls would have won against the German army, and the whole Kaltenstein thing is just a cheap cop out.
Pomorya: It needs to be blown up, nuff said. By Immortal Elves, preferrably, because it spoils their reputation. It would have been alright if it was a Tir poser state, but the concept was actually a Tir-like elf magic state, and that is just dumb. Besides, where did these elf houses come from? Even more immortals? No sireee, it's the worst part, besides for Berlin.
Westrhine-Luxembourg: Dwarves usually are about as rare as Trolls. Where did all these dwarves come from, hunh? Besides, yet another metahuman kingdom ... DUUH!
Berlin: Stupid to me, but then again, I know the city quite well.
Frankfurt: Kinda alright, one of the better parts.
Hamburg: I agree, it was kinda alright OK.

Okay, so half the countries was a bit overblown, but WRL, Pomorya, TKS, Berlin, Saxony, Westphalia, those countries blow big time, if you ask me. At the very least, these need a serious overhaul. smile.gif
MYST1C
QUOTE (hermit)
Well, all the less likely that they could be effectively governed (or have any chance at being elected).

Which government is it that the ASU is involved in? And in which book?

QUOTE (hermit)
Saxony: The whole monarchy thing is just stupid. This isn't the Liebliche Feld, after all. nyahnyah.gif

The thing is, one should not regard it as a monarchy. It is a dictatorship that poses as a monarchy, founded during the Euro-Wars by a general who declared his part of the frontline his turf and made himself duke.
He brought order and stability to the region so they let him do as he pleased. And afterwards the military rule was so firmly established that the people had no option but to obey.
(And it's obviously one of the "evil" states SR players love to hate, like Aztlan. In the AGS you have the radical clerics, the racist elves and the fascist pseudo-nobles.)

QUOTE (hermit)
Troll Kingdom: It is not viable economically, it is unbelievable the Trolls would have won against the German army, and the whole Kaltenstein thing is just a cheap cop out.

The metahuman resistance (they weren't all trolls) didn't fight the Bundeswehr, just the army of the South German League.
And where exactly is this Kaltenstein-connection? I seem to miss this information...

QUOTE (hermit)
Westrhine-Luxembourg: Dwarves usually are about as rare as Trolls. Where did all these dwarves come from, hunh? Besides, yet another metahuman kingdom ... DUUH!

According to SoE Germany has 10% dwarves. This means a total of 9,970,000 (out of 99,700,000).
West-Lux has 48% dwarves*. That's 443,520 (out of 924,000).
Half a million out of 10 millions. IMHO OK.
And the monarchy thing: West-Lux is the successor to Luxembourg. Adolphe III would be the ruler of Luxembourg, had his country not been destroyed by the Cattenom incident**.
So it's not a monarchy (and at the same time probably the most democratic state of the AGS, alongside Thuringia) because of it's mainly metahuman people but because it's the successor state to another monarchy ruled by the same family. Adolphe's race is of no concern.

Then again, there's this whole "return of the nobility" theme in SoE...

QUOTE (hermit)
Okay, so half the countries was a bit overblown, but WRL, Pomorya, TKS, Berlin, Saxony, Westphalia, those countries blow big time, if you ask me. At the very least, these need a serious overhaul. smile.gif

Well, Berlin has changed already and it seems things are changing in Westphalia as well with this whole religious hardliner-vs-reformer conflict in the comet aftermath.

* DidS2, p.143, right column, lower half, gives an explanation for the high dwarven percentage. It's debatable of course.
** The meltdown takes place on my 29th birthday. Lucky me.
Ancient History
QUOTE (M¥$T1C)

QUOTE (Grinder)
Germany is too small to split up in a balkan-fashion
.
True.
But I (and other players I know) have always treated the AGS more or less as a successor to the FRG just with more power in the hands of the state governments, not a bunch of really independent mini-nations.

Not to put a wrinkle in y'all's diaper, but there is a little thing called historical precedence to remember. Once upon a time, Germany WAS a tremendous group of mini-nations. As Mark Twain put it once "You couldn't stretch out your legs to sleep without a passport."

Now, given that was way, way back in the day...but it shows it's possible, if not likely.
MYST1C
QUOTE (Ancient History)
Not to put a wrinkle in y'all's diaper, but there is a little thing called historical precedence to remember. Once upon a time, Germany WAS a tremendous group of mini-nations.

True. But the circumstances were different!

QUOTE (Ancient History)
Now, given that was way, way back in the day...but it shows it's possible, if not likely.

Well, all these German states had existed for centuries before uniting into one nation.
The thought that Germany could re-splinter into seperate states again, in this totally different world, after surviving the Euro-Wars, is a little weird.
Plus, it's a common theme among AGS haters to (IMHO) exaggerate the whole balkanization thing. It is still one nation with one capital, one currency and one government.
The name has changed, the states have been reorganized and the state governments have more power than today.
It's not a mini-EU but rather a United States of Germany.
hermit
QUOTE
Not to put a wrinkle in y'all's diaper, but there is a little thing called historical precedence to remember. Once upon a time, Germany WAS a tremendous group of mini-nations. As Mark Twain put it once "You couldn't stretch out your legs to sleep without a passport."

True, but that was quite some time ago. Things have changed, and I just don't see it happen again.

QUOTE
Now, given that was way, way back in the day...but it shows it's possible, if not likely.

It's about as likely as the Roman Empire rising again would be.

QUOTE
Which government is it that the ASU is involved in? And in which book?

Brennpunkt: ADL, the ASU has made it to strongest power the latest parliamentary elections (if I remember correctly, I just browsed over the book a few days ago before I decided not to buy it; I'll check it out tomorrow again).

QUOTE
And where exactly is this Kaltenstein-connection? I seem to miss this information...

DidS2, p. 234 (last page of "Königreich ohne König").

QUOTE
(And it's obviously one of the "evil" states SR players love to hate, like Aztlan. In the AGS you have the radical clerics, the racist elves and the fascist pseudo-nobles.)

I guess I should be lucky they didn't give the Sorb minority their own nation state too. nyahnyah.gif

QUOTE
Plus, it's a common theme among AGS haters to (IMHO) exaggerate the whole balkanization thing. It is still one nation with one capital, one currency and one government.

Depends how you play it, I guess, but at least the Alpers triology (Graue Eminenz Zyklus) left no room for interpretation (the first novel's title, 'the torn nation', sets the mood). Also, the first DidS book emphathised the torn aspect (balkanisation) over the unity. And it just makes no sense.

QUOTE
It's not a mini-EU but rather a United States of Germany.

It seems to me more like a wannabe Heiliges Römisches Reich Deutscher Nation, just democratic and without a Kaiser. What dies Hannover do? I mean, is it even mentioned in the books? I cannot really rmemeber ... adn mind you Germany today already is as federalised as the US are.
MYST1C
QUOTE (hermit)
Brennpunkt: ADL, the ASU has made it to strongest power the latest parliamentary elections

As I said - I don't own B:ADL.
That's in fact weird.
But I don't know their campaign. Today thousands of people vote PDS although the majority of them would not want a socialist Germany.

QUOTE (hermit)
QUOTE
And where exactly is this Kaltenstein-connection? I seem to miss this information...

DidS2, p. 234 (last page of "Königreich ohne König").

Thanks. It's been a while since I last read through DidS2.

QUOTE (hermit)
Depends how you play it, I guess, but at least the Alpers triology (Graue Eminenz Zyklus) left no room for interpretation (the first novel's title, 'the torn nation', sets the mood).

But aside from the basic story idea those are easily the worst SR novels ever. They clearly showed Alpers didn't understand what he was writing about.

QUOTE (hermit)
Also, the first DidS book emphathised the torn aspect (balkanisation) over the unity. And it just makes no sense.

As I said on the Berlin example: It seems the writers came to their senses in later years.
I'm not sure but I seem to remember that some details of Germany were already set before DidS, in one of the Harlequin adventures that took place in Germany.
IIRC the flooding of Hamburg, the troll kingdom and the balkanization were established there and the German authors had to work with it.

QUOTE (hermit)
What dies Hannover do? I mean, is it even mentioned in the books? I cannot really rmemeber

B:ADL supposedly has a whole chapter about the inner workings of the AGS, its constitution, etc.
The federal government in Hannover does stuff concerning all of Germany: Foreign relations, defense, currency, high level crime (BKA, BIS and BGS are federal agencies)
QUOTE (hermit)
adn mind you Germany today already is as federalised as the US are.

There are differences.
AFAIK the way parliamanent and senate work can not be directly compared to our Bundestag and Bundesrat.
And in the USA the states are far more independent from the federal government than in Germany. That's why you find a wide variety of laws, crime punishments and even varying levels of democracy there (some states are actually direct democracies like Switzerland, AFAIK).
That's why there is this separation between state and federal laws in the movies. Break a federal law and the FBI is hunting you instead of "only" the state police.
Here in Germany we have only "federal crimes" as federal law rules over state law (that's why Hessian courts may not issue the death penalty even though it's in their state's constitution). That's also true in the USA but there's comparatively much less federal law.
US states even have their own armies (the respective national guards).

And IMO the difference between the FRG and the USA is about the same as between the FRG and the AGS. The states have more rights, freedoms and responsibilities but there is still one unifying German government above them, although it's less powerful than today.
hermit
QUOTE
But I don't know their campaign. Today thousands of people vote PDS although the majority of them would not want a socialist German

Oh, if only that were the case ... sadly, getting communism out of peoples' heads is much harder than gettinmg fascism out (mostly). It'll take at least a generation, and the economy isn't making things better.

QUOTE
But aside from the basic story idea those are easily the worst SR novels ever. They clearly showed Alpers didn't understand what he was writing about.

No, the later Gascoigne & Sargent novels, not to mention Dragonheart, are much, much worse. BTW, do you know any of the new German novels? Are they good?

QUOTE
IIRC the flooding of Hamburg, the troll kingdom and the balkanization were established there and the German authors had to work with it.

Yeah, and I recognise that (said that in the SoLA thread already). And my main qualms are with DidS; DidS2 is a step upward.

QUOTE
That's why there is this separation between state and federal laws in the movies. Break a federal law and the FBI is hunting you instead of "only" the state police.

But we have that too ... with the reform of the reform of grammar, now, there might well not even be coherent grammar any more.

I agree federal law has less power in the US, but the FRG is already extremely federal. Anything significantly more federal, like the AGS, is just a confederation, like Serbia and Macedonia, not a real country any more.
MYST1C
QUOTE (hermit)
No, the later Gascoigne & Sargent novels, not to  mention Dragonheart, are much, much worse.

IMO at their core the Dragonheart novels were not that bad. The thing is, they were lightyears away from SR's "street operatives" theme.
They were not runner novels but superhero tales set in the SR universe.

QUOTE (hermit)
BTW, do you know any of the new German novels? Are they good?

The most recent book I own is the "Matrixfeuer" anthology - it's quite nice.
I haven't bought many SR novels in the last years but it seems anything by Lara Möller or Maike Hallmann is OK.

QUOTE (hermit)
Anything significantly more federal, like the AGS, is just a confederation, like Serbia and Macedonia, not a real country any more.

Actually, SoE gives Germany's government type as "Confederated Republic".
Penta
Wow. And the German SR and English SR are supposed to be in the same universe???
Grinder
I agree that the ags has some nice and (more or less) well-thought countries, but the overall picture of the german states is not really fitting. Back in german history had been a phase when a lot of small states existed on german soil, but that's over and out. And i heavily doubt that it will ever happen again. Splitting into three or four bigger countries is something else and imo more possible. I could imagine something like a northern alliance (which already exists in sr canon), a souterhn state, a state aroung and including berlin and the independent rhein-ruhr-plex. That would fit much better imo. (wonder what italian players are saying about italy 2060?)

But unimportant however the development of germany 2070 will be, please please please destroy pomyra! Blast it, nuke it, give it a civil war, even bring some shitty Immortal Nazi Elves into it, but please destry the country aka the german veriosn of a Tir. nyahnyah.gif
Grinder
QUOTE (Penta)
Wow. And the German SR and English SR are supposed to be in the same universe???

Yep.

That's why Germany has it's own Tir-like state. USA got one, even those bloody insel folks in Ireland got their own elven magic kingdom - so we need one too! rotfl.gif
hermit
QUOTE
Wow. And the German SR and English SR are supposed to be in the same universe???

All it takes is a healthy dose of crack and suspense of disbelief inside the game world. wink.gif

I'd consider a split into three states - Northern League, Bavarian-Fracnonian-Wurttemberg-Baden alliance, and a new East (especially a new East/West split is possible, in my opinion). Not a fracturing into several statelets, some of them really, really crazed.

QUOTE
That's why Germany has it's own Tir-like state. USA got one, even those bloody insel folks in Ireland got their own elven magic kingdom - so we need one too!

Yup. And since we're better than them, we also got a troll and a dwarf state, two neoanarchist paradises (Berlin and Marienbad) in the original AGS, three new AAA corps (which were scaled down in english canon), one of which has no way of making revenue but is spending money like there's no tomorrow (Proteus), and a load of other stuff. And new cars and weapons that come VERY close to munchkinism.

Granted, most has been smoothened out somewhat, but a lot of it remains, simply because a complete rewrite would angfer a lotm of fans of that setting. I understand the authors are in a tight spot there, and I respect that.

But I want to see sensible change nonetheless. smile.gif
Penta
If we're knocking things over wholesale with SR4, why not knock things over totally with the German setting?
MYST1C
QUOTE (Penta)
If we're knocking things over wholesale with SR4, why not knock things over totally with the German setting?

It would piss off a good portion of the German players!
While there are the AGS-haters there are also many people who actually like (most of) the German setting.
hermit
Well, it COULD use a complete overhaul ... not saying to change history, but move on. Make it somewhat more believable. The Germany SB was twritten, apparently, when Sr was still more of a joke setting, not the very serious cyberpunk game it is now. It just looks wrong in every way imaginable.

I'd like to see a somewhat believable future Germany, not the AGS with a wireless Matrix. At the very least, I'd like to see the Meta Monarchies, Saxonia, Proteus, and Marienbad getting a serious overhaul, respectively be dissolved (especially the Troll Kingdom and Pomorya).
MYST1C
QUOTE (hermit)
Marienbad

Marienbad is now a part of Czechia so it's of no concern for the future AGS.

Changes I'd like to see:
- Pomorya: wiped
- Troll Kingdom: somehow more believable
- Saxony & Westphalia: made less extreme
hermit
Yeah, forgot about Westphalia. And Marienbad is Czech now? Isn't the final word still to be spoken about this?
Grinder
I don't think the german government want Marienbad back. wink.gif
hermit
Orichalcon mines ...?
Synner
Marienbad is definitely Czech these days although how their AGS neighbors are and will swallow such a move is still up in the air.

And as was revealed in Shockwaves, Proteus had a really good way of making money besides genetech, biotech, deepsea mining and licensing their tech.
hermit
QUOTE
And as was revealed in Shockwaves, Proteus had a really good way of making money besides genetech, biotech, deepsea mining and licensing their tech.

They better do. wink.gif

And as the AGS has been described in German publications, they'd swallow just anything, as the "Confederated Republic" is apparently incapable of any sort of foreign policy, and each state prefers to do it's business by itself. More like the EU, only even mroe dysfunctional. which makes no sense at all, but meh, that's German SR for you. nyahnyah.gif
Crimson Jack
I find it mildly funny that the issue of plausibility is being ranted over in a game chalk full of metahumans, dragons, and magic. Heh. grinbig.gif
hermit
Oh, I have also ranted about the plausibility for a lv. 20 Paladin to swim through a river wearing his full plate armour of holy what's-his-name, his +5 war hammer, 20 kilogram of stuff. wink.gif

Besides, dragons and metahumans aside, a game set on a near future earth has to maintain some plausibility.
Grinder
I agree hermit. There must be some kind of logic behind all events, even when it comes down to creating new states for the ags. Even the holy writers of DidS 1+2 should think about one minute longer before creating the german tir-state or a bunch of new monarchies. wink.gif
Skarn Ka
QUOTE (hermit)

QUOTE
Hello? Is Somalia the nation with Africa's strongest growth rates? No? Why not? Maybe because investors fucking don't want their investment been blown up by some crackhead lunatic, maybe?


To give the German setting a fair trial, I'd note only East-Berlin is in the anarchs hands, while the corps are deeply implanted in the Western neighborhoods where there is no anarchism.
They cleaned it in 58 or something like that.

QUOTE

Also, while we're at it: Proteus. Renraku paid through the nose for one (1) Arcology in Seattle. Proteus, a second-tier who, countrary to Renraku, is active only in niche markets like "contractors" and environmental adaption by means of genetech, apparently has the money to build five (5) of these things, or rather, pull them out of their ass. and no, that's not enough - they also have to build a space port, and not produce anything valid in their arcoloies! All they do is crazy genetech unethical shit. Very rewarding! The business modfel of the future! Do expensive stuff that will never pay and make you look like assholes! Way to go Proteus!


Actually all this is covered from A to Z in the Schockwellen campaign, and perfectly justified there. This is actually the raison d'etre of the campaign.
Perhaps taking a look there would be more profitable than considering the authors are stupid. wink.gif
MYST1C
QUOTE (Skarn Ka)
To give the German setting a fair trial, I'd note only East-Berlin is in the anarchs hands, while the corps are deeply implanted in the Western neighborhoods where there is no anarchism.

The corporate involvement in Anarchist Berlin was originally explained with the lawless state of the city: No experiment is illegal, no environmental laws to obey, no employee rights, neither Black ICE is illegal nor deadly force by corporate guards, industrial espionage (read: Shadowruns) is not illegal, etc.

QUOTE (Skarn Ka)
They cleaned it in 58 or something like that.

2055
TW
I'd agree that you'd need more than a healthy dose of "suspension of disbelief" for yourself and your gaming group when runing the german shadows as descirbed in DidS1. But I'd also say that the let's-balkanize-everything-patchwork-nation-we're-better-than-the-UCAS-image of DidS1 was seriously downplayed in later publications such as DidS2, BP:ADL and even more in SoE (at least that was my attempt when writing the German chapter). Just look at all the dragons that we forced out of the AGS (Kaltenstein, Schwartzkopf) or that the german authors had killed over the last few years (Nachtmeister) as one example, thereby reducing the number of Dragons on AGS turf to 2 (Lofwyr & Nebelherr). Opening Westphalia and introducing speculations on a reunion with Rome are other examples.

As for Proteus, we tried to give a plausible explanation for the existence of the Corp and it's power in "Schockwellen" without rewriting the already existing background (too much nyahnyah.gif). Personally, I think we succeeded in both attempts, which finally led to portraying the AGS not so much as a crazed and over the top version of the UCAS, but as a unique and exiting setting that blends in with the rest of Europe while still keeping some unique and interesting aspects.

Just my 0,02 €
hermit
Not having played "Schockwellen", I cannot say whether I like the explanation or not, but ... Kaltenstein is still alive and in the AGS in DidS2! Much to my surprise, I found he has been backing the kingdom of Schwarzewald all along, which is why it continued to thrive despite it's being economically totally unviable.

I grant you that DidS2 took out the worst parts of DidS1 (like Berlin, dragons literally stepping on each others' tails). I also acknowledge it's pretty difficult to write something that relativates the setting (for people like Grinder and me) and still keeps the feel that, apparently, others like (like Mystic).

SoE portrayed the AGS almost reasonably - as good as possible considering the groundwork laid in DidS1. I just hope, though, that the setting gets a slightly more wide overhaul, removing the other too-small-to-be-viable states (TKS, Saxony, WRL, Berlin's anarcist quarter - who is supplying them anyway?) as well as the last remaining crazed ideas, like Westphalia and especially Pomorya. Or, at the very least, I hope to see something in another book that details just how much the elves of the Tirs hate the Pomoryan wannabes - and I really hope the Vatican will open a giant can of asswhop on cardinal Bernhard. wink.gif
Grinder
Yes, removing the too-small states would make me feel much more comfortable with the german setting. That must be possible canon-wise, just let their economy collapse (so they have one) the 2070-crash offers a great opportunity for that.
Crimson Jack
Well, who better to know than those who live in Germany. I guess its a bit easier for me to swallow as someone on the other side of the planet, who knows little-to-nothing of the current socio-political going ons in Germany. However, I have to roll my eyes at how the NAN takeover is handled in SR lore. It seems unlikely-to-impossible that most of the USA would be broken up how it is in Shadowrun. I just accept that its fantasy/fiction though and don't worry about how believable it all is.

I guess that was my point really, despite the fact that I can understand your collective beefs with how its written.
hermit
Well, guess what, I don't think that how the NAN came to be makes much sense either. Not in today's context. It can only be explained by 80s Cyberpunk literature, that always assumed the US would break up for no apparent reason (part of the Dark Future theme).

By today's standards, America turning into a fascist nightmare much like Japan is portrayed in early Shadowrun fiction is much more likely. wink.gif
audun
QUOTE (Grinder)
- the awakening of the anarchist movement. It's not nearly as strong as the authors wanted it to be. Neither today nor will it in 2060. And it's presented in such a naive and nerdy manner, that i can only sadly shake my head about it.

I won't and can't defend the way the anarchist movement is presented in DiDS, DiDS2, B:ADL or Germany SB because I don't own any of them. Though as a general point, it's fully plausible that the anarchist movement will be stronger by 2060 than today. You may dislike it as an idea or as a part of the setting, but that doesn't make it implausible.

QUOTE (hermit)
The Authors apparently lack any understanding of what a city in true anarchy is like.

So does you appearantly. A city dominated by anarchists would most likely look something like the Paris commune, Barcelona during the Civil War or like one of the "free cities" established around the world with Copenhagens Christiania as the most promininent. Not like Mogadishu dead.gif
[ Spoiler ]

Though, it doesn't seem like the German authors did anything in that direction either. Having a Anarchist Party entering government indicates that they have no clue about anarchism what so ever. Anarchist parties contradicts nearly any strand of anarchist thougth, and if said party enters government they are no longer anarchists. Anarchists who go soft and create parties and enters governments are known as Greens (and sometimes they take the full turn and become Fascists like Mussolini did).
Crimson Jack
QUOTE (audun)
Though, it doesn't seem like the German authors did anything in that direction either. Having a Anarchist Party entering government indicates that they have no clue about anarchism what so ever. Anarchist parties contradicts nearly any strand of anarchist thougth, and if said party enters government they are no longer anarchists.

"Screw government control over your lives, brothers! Elect me as your Anarchy Party leader!"

- Campaign speech, Anarchy Party
Garland
QUOTE (audun @ Apr 19 2005, 03:57 PM)
A city dominated by anarchists would most likely look something like the Paris commune, Barcelona during the Civil War or like one of the "free cities" established around the world with Copenhagens Christiania as the most promininent. Not like Mogadishu

Maybe I'm just cynical, but I think human nature would turn just about any city without formalized law and enforcement into the Mog. An "anarchy" founded on peaceful principles would only make this transformation easier.

EDIT: added "enforcment." That's what I was trying to say anyway.
Crimson Jack
Agreed. I like the idea in a fantasy setting, where I can park my brain at the door. But I sincerely doubt it would work in reality. But what do I know?
hermit
QUOTE

So does you appearantly. A city dominated by anarchists would most likely look something like the Paris commune, Barcelona during the Civil War or like one of the "free cities" established around the world with Copenhagens Christiania as the most promininent.

Sorry, those are small scale projects led by fanatics to their cause and populated by adamant followers. No way this would work for a city of five million, especially if the majority is NOT QUITE convinced of that ideology.

QUOTE

Maybe I'm just cynical, but I think human nature would turn just about any city without formalized law and enforcement into the Mog. An "anarchy" founded on peaceful principles would only make this transformation easier.

Especially if you bring in a 100% tolerance towards all kinds of weaponry. Insta-Mog, no matter how honest the leaders' intentions may have been (and if you read the Germany SB, the whole 'project' was born out of violence, and hence, doomed to mogadize from the beginning).

QUOTE

"Screw government control over your lives, brothers! Elect me as your Anarchy Party leader!"

- Campaign speech, Anarchy Party

They always remind me of the Mexican PRI (party of institutionalised revolution). About as ridiculous. The PRI will always be my favourite political party ever, leading even the Monster Raving Loonies Party in Britain.
Grinder
QUOTE (audun)
So does you appearantly. A city dominated by anarchists would most likely look something like the Paris commune, Barcelona during the Civil War or like one of the "free cities" established around the world with Copenhagens Christiania as the most promininent. Not like Mogadishu dead.gif

I can only agree with hermit: a city as crowded as berlin 2060 won't stay peaceful under anarchist rulers for long. Maybe it can work in smaller communities (the one copenhagen is only a small part of the city iirc), but not in a big city where a majority of the population doesn't back the ruling ideas. And honestly, i can't imagine the average berlin inhabitant backing anarchy in a constructive manner. wink.gif
hermit
I'd rather see them backing a third Reich or a new socialist state. Especially the latter. The city is under commie rule anyway.
Birdy
About the only thing that works half-way is Rhein-Ruhr (and even that has big holes). At least if you drop any hints of sub-terran "Dwarf Kingdoms" and explain (with a "Kantholz") what a "Grubenwehr"[1] is to some authors.

The small kingdoms back until 1871 could exist because back then this was a lightly populated (Remember the 30 years war?) agrarian country and because they often belonged to one King/Family. In todays environment they don't work (i.e a lot of parts for the BMW are produced in what would be Westphalia in SR).

I could have seen a US-style state (and me emigrating to a nice nation like China) with more powerful states and a weakened government. I could have seen political power blocks (we have them today haves vs. have not states i.e)

They would have been better of with Westfalien "Catholic terrorists" or going "Religious dictatorship with freedom fighters" instead of "all Westfalians are conservativ-catholic ideots" (Hint: Quite a few are neither catholic nor conservativ). Neither is the area "all rural".

I can't see a state with a rather well-equiped state-police (Former german border guards[BGS, still named that in SR], those guys have armored cars, maschine guns and Puma/Super Puma gunships) and a battle-hardened army accept something like "Pomoyra". The best an "all fey" region might hope for is a "Danish" solution (Representation in the state parliament without adherence to a 5% of votes rule)

Add in that feys are a rather small (and quite modern) part of our mythologie (we go for dwarfs) and there is even less base. On the other hand, Tir NaNog makes no sense either. "Seelie" never ruled that land and the Irish had "anti-Seelie" construction elements in many buildings[2].

The "nuclear plant runaways" in northern germany have a problem. Common wind direction would deliver the fallout smack on Hamburg. That is a common problem (and still gets ignored by emergency plans) of those power plants. And one wonders why other plants never even burped despite being in history-charged territory.

Berlin is not self-sufficient. It wasn't during the blockade in 1949 and is even less today. All the state would have to do is blockade and wait. The city should be dead after around 3-6 month.

The "Passau Treaties" (Our version of Shiawas vs USA) fall smack into the middle of a military dictatorship. Sure the war-hardened and mobilised army would roll over and let the cons take power. After all some SMG-equipped CorpSec goons might splatter blood on the armies tanks

We never where that heavy on dragons (It's more an english thing) Our heros tend to be more worldly. Sadly our rich mythic history gets ignored right and left since many consider it "brown" (It isn't). Only lately we see limited hints at the stuff.

Birdy


[1] The "Wehr" means "disaster defence / aid" like in "Feuerwehr" (Fire department) and those guys are the rescue teams of a german mine.
[2]It's more likely any "Elf nation wannaby" would have made contact with Paddy O'Tools Shillelag. And that of Ian and George and...
hermit
QUOTE
I can't see a state with a rather well-equiped state-police (Former german border guards[BGS, still named that in SR], those guys have armored cars, maschine guns and Puma/Super Puma gunships) and a battle-hardened army accept something like "Pomoyra". The best an "all fey" region might hope for is a "Danish" solution (Representation in the state parliament without adherence to a 5% of votes rule)

Yea, if the Sorbs can do it, so could the dandelion eaters ... >_<

And I found the idea that the state withdraws just like that always a bit ludicrous. Well, what can I say, most of DidS1 was nerdy anarchist wannabes daydreaming. nyahnyah.gif

QUOTE
The small kingdoms back until 1871 could exist because back then this was a lightly populated (Remember the 30 years war?) agrarian country and because they often belonged to one King/Family.

And add that most of these small duchies and fiefdoms actually were subordinate to one of the major players, one way or another (or church territory).

QUOTE
About the only thing that works half-way is Rhein-Ruhr (and even that has big holes). At least if you drop any hints of sub-terran "Dwarf Kingdoms" and explain (with a "Kantholz") what a "Grubenwehr"[1] is to some authors.

Hahahaha! Good point! Although, with Earthdawn, that underground kingdom can be explained as a forgotten, never reopened Caér. Rhine-Ruhr actually still is the best part, with Pomorya, pre-DidS2 BErlin, and Westphalia competing for the title of worst part.

QUOTE
Add in that feys are a rather small (and quite modern) part of our mythologie (we go for dwarfs) and there is even less base.

Sorry, not quite. Actually, Elves (or rather, Elben, Alben or Erlen) are a quite important part of ancient Germanic mythology. Ever wondered why the stinking sludge running through Hamburg was called "Elbe"? Remember Goethe's "Der Erlkoenig" (about tranlates to "the [dark] elf king") from back in school? And who do you think gives you an Albtraum (German for nightmare)?
Elves started out as viking/germanic house and hearth spirits, actually. You'd offer them little gifts like a bowl of milk or some cookies daily in their house elf corner, or they'd be pissed and make all kinds of shit happen. Much like Fey, actually.

I agree with you on their disregard of Germanic/German mythology because the original authors (who no doupt rank among the far left crowd). Quite a pity, as there's a lot more in there than Wagner and the spook Goering made of it, but meh, ideology über alles, right? But there ARE dragons in there too. Remember how Siegfried got his invulnerability? Bathing in dragon blood.

And yes, Westphalia was Prussian for over 200 years, and that left traces. It's just small mindedness again.

I wonder if the original authors really were going for a serious setting when they wrote DidS1. I sure hope not, that'd shed a very unfortunate light on them.
Demosthenes
QUOTE (Birdy)
On the other hand, Tir NaNog makes no sense either. "Seelie" never ruled that land and the Irish had "anti-Seelie" construction elements in many buildings.

Actually, Tir na nOg isn't that bad, all things considered.
I don't agree with the police-state presentation of Ireland, and they simplified the whole IRA/Northern Ireland problem a bit, but it's not too bad at all.
[Edit]Apart from the bit about slang, and the truly unforgiveable errors like mis-spelling 'Feile' (it would take very little research to get that right...). But then, I'm a linguist, and stuff like that annoys me.[/edit]

As to 'Seelie': 'Seelie' is a term defining an affiliation among the Sidhe, (fey, if you prefer), rather than a term defining the Sidhe themselves.

According to Irish myth, the Daoine Sidhe (or Si, or Sith) did indeed rule Ireland in ancient times (the Tuatha De Danann, Firbolg, and Fomori all come to mind).

The incorporation of 'anti-sidhe' elements into buildings was as much an aspect of Christian practice (refusal/denial of pagan beliefs) as anything else.

I personally know people who believe in the Daoine Sidhe - there are relatives of mine who claim to have heard the Beansidhe crying. It's not exactly a common belief, but it still persists in some places.
Birdy
Oh, I know folks who believe Luzifer exists. But last I looked the Franziskans where not actually worshippers of him. biggrin.gif

As for the "Alben" - yes. Kobolds/Hearth Spirits/Fairies etc are part of german mythologie. But the classical "Tolkien-Style" Elf isn't. Even Alberich was "small and dark" not "tall and handsom". Most of those went along the 30cm and busy/mischivious variety. Often living "underground" or behind a illusional wall. (Caern?) and/or as lights in a moor/swamp.

As for dragons, the deceased "Lindwurm" (Fafnir IIRC) is one of the few in classic german mythology. Who needs a dragon when Giants and Gods walk the earth and the "Wild Hunt" (that actually made it as did "modern" and lately [SoE] some classical witchcraft) runs overhead? Never said we had no dragons but they are few and far in between.

As for Westphalia being Prussian: I know biggrin.gif Have been around there for quite a few years. Among other things the Prussians gave us a sizeable protestant minority (or majority in some regions) and some quite impressiv infrastructures (Just for defence, you know wink.gif ) including some major channels/channel crosses etc. That (and modern traffic structure) leads to my disagreement with FANPRO material. Just too much important stuff for the Rhein-Ruhr to give up. (Funny side note: Westphalia might actually be able to exists as an independent nation [Say of GDR/DDR level] since they included IIRC Osnabrück in it)


Birdy (Anti-Catholic Rebell and Westfalian in Exile)
hermit
QUOTE
As for dragons, the deceased "Lindwurm" (Fafnir IIRC) is one of the few in classic german mythology. Who needs a dragon when Giants and Gods walk the earth and the "Wild Hunt" (that actually made it as did "modern" and lately [SoE] some classical witchcraft) runs overhead? Never said we had no dragons but they are few and far in between.

Yeah, apart from Fafnir, all I can recall is Nidhoegg and the half-decayed sperm whale St. George called a dragon, stabbed and claimed to have slain (and was made a saint for). Of course, you culd count the Midgaard snake, but that'd be quite stretched already. France and especially Britain (Wales!) have so many more dragon-related legends.

QUOTE
As for the "Alben" - yes. Kobolds/Hearth Spirits/Fairies etc are part of german mythologie. But the classical "Tolkien-Style" Elf isn't. Even Alberich was "small and dark" not "tall and handsom". Most of those went along the 30cm and busy/mischivious variety. Often living "underground" or behind a illusional wall. (Caern?) and/or as lights in a moor/swamp.

Alright, but so were nordic trolls. All feyfolk are portrayed as smallish and in varying degrees of coboldy-ness. Tolkien-ish elves with pointy ears are a phenomenon that appeared only in modern times (though the Romans sometimes depicted satyrs like that).
Demosthenes
Actually, the Fey in Celtic mythology were originally portrayed as just as big as normal people - if not a bit taller. After all, they were gods, or the children of the gods. (Tuatha de Danaan = People of Danu, or Don...)

As to Tolkien-ish pointy ears....I've no idea what their origin is.

I can't speak as to the fey in German mythology, but I'd imagine they became smaller as time went on. (If they followed the same pattern you see in France, Britain and Ireland - which is not at all necessarily the case...)
hermit
Really? Always thought this was a post-Tolkien interpretation ...

I would guess they followed the same pattern; after all, the cultures in Germany and France at that time very similar and interchanged a lot of concepts.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012