Crimsondude 2.0
May 13 2005, 01:02 AM
What and derail a bunch of people making sense?
Ed Simons
May 13 2005, 01:03 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Ed Simons: Use the search function. In seconds you will find a multitude of arguments that Elves are nearly worthless and overpriced.
~J |
Yet the complainers still always play elves.
And it's consistently the most popular metatype in polls I've seen here.
Based how common I've seen them in play, I think the cost for elves should be increased. As I've posted on some of those threads you're referring to.
SpasticTeapot
May 13 2005, 04:54 AM
I just use the assorted attribute edges. My GM is happy to allow a PC to stack bonuses so long as they're not used for munchkiny purposes. (A charisma of 7 after plastic surgery is pretty unusualy on a troll, you have to admit that much.) Sure, he's better looking than almost anyone, but, like most shadowrunners, he's the exception to the rules.
One of my favorite characters (courtesy of Blackjack, if I recall) is a troll named Frou-Frou, a go-go dancer. (As in "little bunny frou frou....") However, unlike most go-go dancers, frou-frou is a very large and scary feminist troll who had spent most of her life before getting a job working in a club in the orc underground "bopping people on the head." She's essentially the opposite of most dancers; unlike your stereotypical ditz with great looks, no mind to speak of, and a tendency to make squeaky noises when scared, Frou-Frou is a willful, intelligent troll with a left hook that will leave even the toughest of sprawl gangers out cold.
So, in short, the stats reflect the rule, to which there are exceptions. Dogs tend to be less smart than dolphins, but there are obvious exceptions to this rule. Autistic people tend to have trouble in social situations, but a good friend of mine had little trouble making friends with anyone he met, despite the fact that he was autistic. (He was also the best D&D player I've yet to meet.)
EDIT:
Considering that only non-munchies actually put any points into charisma anyway, Elves are pretty reasonably priced. I'm playing one simply because I want to have a PC who fits the mould of a "spaghetti western"-style hero; he's dashing and debonair, but a little bit different from the average Joe or Jane in many ways, and, to most folks, pretty scary. (He's also fond of old-west style shootouts.)
Kagetenshi
May 13 2005, 05:07 AM
QUOTE (SpasticTeapot @ May 12 2005, 11:54 PM) |
Considering that only non-munchies actually put any points into charisma anyway |
You have clearly never seen some of the Face or Conjurer builds that have come my way.
To say nothing of the Face/Conjurers. Or the Face/Conjurer/Decker/Riggers.
~J
Charon
May 13 2005, 05:16 AM
QUOTE (Aardvark892) |
Not all elves should automatically get a bonus to CHR, since in someplaces pointed ears can be a definate drawback |
Your charisma doesn't fluctuate with the audience. The TN to your negotiation check might, but not your charisma.
QUOTE |
and not all Orks (or Orcs, depending on your spelling preference) should automatically get a minus mod on thier INT. |
Yes they should. The average orc is less intelligent than a human. It's part of the game world.
There, I said it ; the average orc and troll is dumber than the average human. Are we going to get PC on fictive races?
You want a smart orc, you max INT and live with a score of 5 instead of 6.
---
Sure, it tends to stererotype races to a degree. Few mage players are interested in selecting a race with mental attribute penalties, for example. But what merit would you have to play against stereotype if there was no price to pay, hmm?
---
Finally, these stereotypes are no accidents of the game system that needs to be corrected. Designers knew what kind of bias it would introduce in character creation and were okay with it. Just look at the characters from the novels. Or consider the fact that female PCs have no penalties to physical attributes. It's hardly realist but the cyberpunk genre and the fantasy genre, the fundations of shadowrun, both thrive on kick ass female character, which you wouldn't have a lot of if penalties were applied. Similarly, the average orc or troll is supposed to be brutish. Sophisticated troll and schorlarly orcs are interesting specifically because they are not the norm. So there you have it.
Arethusa
May 13 2005, 05:42 AM
QUOTE (Charon) |
Yes they should. The average orc is less intelligent than a human. It's part of the game world. |
No, no, no, no, no. The average black person tests intelligence worse than the average white person. That is a normal distribution shift. A -1 or -2 Intelligence modifier affects maximum intelligence. It represents stupidity, not average shift. PLEASE STOP MIXING THEM UP.
QUOTE (Charon) |
Or consider the fact that female PCs have no penalties to physical attributes. It's hardly realist |
Please, let's not start that one again.
Charon
May 13 2005, 05:52 AM
What's your point here? Just trying to be annoying?
Won't work. I just hate the best brownies ever. Nothing will annoy me for the next two hours.
toturi
May 13 2005, 05:56 AM
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 01:42 PM) |
No, no, no, no, no. The average black person tests intelligence worse than the average white person. That is a normal distribution shift. A -1 or -2 Intelligence modifier affects maximum intelligence. It represents stupidity, not average shift. PLEASE STOP MIXING THEM UP. |
Orcs have an average Intelligence lower than humans. Not only is the mean of the orc/troll intelligence lower than that of humans, the maximum intelligence of orcs are also lower than the maximum intelligence of humans. This is the reality of the SR game world. I am not conversant in the usages of mathematical terms. Whether -1 or -2 represents normal distribution shift or not does not mean all that much to me.
To most people, orcs having an average Intelligence lower than humans is the same as the average orc having a lower Intelligence than the average human.
Arethusa
May 13 2005, 06:44 AM
QUOTE (Charon) |
What's your point here? Just trying to be annoying?
Won't work. I just hate the best brownies ever. Nothing will annoy me for the next two hours. |
No, my point is that you and many others do not seem to grasp this simple concept. When you say that the average intelligence of any group is lower, this statement has no bearing on capability of that group; only expressed ability. I keep bringing up blacks scoring lower because it is a very good example of a societal subgroup that tests consistently worse than another group with absolutely no relation to capability; it has everything to do with socioeconomic conditions.
Why so few of you seem capable of differentiating this from a genuinely stupider social subgroup is entirely beyond me. -2 Intelligence represents such a subgroup, because not only is average distribution of cognitive capability shifted, but actual capability is shifted as well. This is why the smartest troll is dumber than the dumbest human. This is not a shift in average; it is a shift in absolute intelligence.
Shanshu Freeman
May 13 2005, 06:52 AM
lol nature vs nurture!!!!!11one
edit: internets!!11eleven
Aardvark892
May 13 2005, 06:54 AM
Wow. I didn't think this was such a sore topic. I don't remember who said it, but the Exceptional Attribute edge is exactly what I needed for my troll, but unfortunately, I created him way before such things were around (he started as a 1st ed.) Thank you all for your inputs for and against.
Charon
May 13 2005, 06:58 AM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
This is why the smartest troll is dumber than the dumbest human. This is not a shift in average; it is a shift in absolute intelligence. |
First of all, the smartest troll is smarter than an average human. I realize you were just using an hyperbole, but it is symptomatic of what is wrong with your whole argument.
Secondly, the sentence you quoted and then disputed was accurate. The average orc is less intelligent than a (average) human. All that chatter about expressed ability VS capability is true and probably gives you a fuzzy feeling but doesn't make my statement false.
You are just arguing for the love of seeing your own words on the screen.
Apathy
May 13 2005, 11:41 AM
QUOTE |
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 01:42 PM) No, no, no, no, no. The average black person tests intelligence worse than the average white person. That is a normal distribution shift. A -1 or -2 Intelligence modifier affects maximum intelligence. It represents stupidity, not average shift. PLEASE STOP MIXING THEM UP. |
In shadowrun game terms, IQ test scores would be a more valid indicator of scholastic skills (mathematics, vocabulary, etc.) than actual intelligence. So the average human (of any race, black, white, asian, etc.) has an average intelligence of 3-4, but due to socio-economic factors may have developed more- or less-than-average academic skills. In contrast, the average troll will have an average int 2 points lower than human (1-2), but with a suitable development environment and enough hard work, could concievably develop a high level of academic skills, and therefore test just as high or higher on an IQ test. However, because the troll's intel is lower, he'll have to work much harder (i.e. more karma cost) to reach that same level of academic proficiency.
...and why do we keep bringing RL human racism into this? Orcs and trolls have nothing to do with black/white/[whatever] racial stereotypes.
Kagetenshi
May 13 2005, 01:00 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
This is why the smartest troll is dumber than the dumbest human. |
Smartest Troll, sans edges and post-chargen karma: INT 4.
Dumbest human: INT 1.
Smartest Troll, with edges and post-chargen karma: INT 8.
~J
toturi
May 13 2005, 01:14 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Smartest Troll, sans edges and post-chargen karma: INT 4.
Dumbest human: INT 1.
Smartest Troll, with edges and post-chargen karma: INT 8.
~J |
Smartest possible troll: Int 11
Kagetenshi
May 13 2005, 01:21 PM
Eh? Troll starting RML: 4, Exceptional Ability makes that 5, 5*1.5 rounded up is 8. What am I missing?
~J
Moon-Hawk
May 13 2005, 01:28 PM
Otaku
edit: And bioware.
Kagetenshi
May 13 2005, 01:46 PM
Bioware can't exceed the racial max. Good call on Otaku, though.
~J
Moon-Hawk
May 13 2005, 01:51 PM
You know, I knew that. I really did.
Critias
May 13 2005, 03:15 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
I keep bringing up blacks scoring lower because it is a very good example of a societal subgroup that tests consistently worse than another group with absolutely no relation to capability; it has everything to do with socioeconomic conditions. |
Right. Except that blacks vs. whites is not the same as orks vs. trolls vs. humans vs. elves. One is a societal subgroup -- blacks, IRL -- but orks/trolls/whatever aren't only societal subgroups, they are truly different creatures than humans. It's hard for us to grasp that (as they are all able to breed with one another, the basic anatomy remains largely the same, etc), but it's a simple fact. They gestate for different time periods, for pete's sake. The have visibly different skin colorations, dental patterns, skeletal structures. They age and mature at different rates than humans. They aren't human beings. Blacks are.
There's a world of difference there. It's funny, but it would almost be easier for some centuries-old (now considered crackpot) doctor to understand the ork/troll/human/elf/dwarf relationship than it is for us, today, as modern human beings. We've had drilled into us for so long that skin color doesn't matter that it's genuinely hard to us, as reasonable human beings to grasp that orks and trolls aren't just mexicans or blacks or asians. They are not human, in the same way that racially-motivated doctors a few hundred years ago insisted that blacks (etc) weren't human (only the simple fact is that, in the SR game world, it's a true statement, not a racist statement).
Stop comparing modern day IQ scores between groups of people differentiated only by social/economic factors and skin pigmentation to game-world-based Intelligence scores between groups of metapeople that are differentiated by quite a bit more than how tan they are. Apples and oranges.
Little Bill
May 13 2005, 03:42 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
No, my point is that you and many others do not seem to grasp this simple concept...This is not a shift in average; it is a shift in absolute intelligence. |
I understood you the first time and disagreed. It's a shift in both average and absolute intelligence.
I see nothing wrong with the idea that all trolls and orks have a lower overall capacity for intelligence than humans. They also have a greater overall capacity for strength and endurance.
Stop bringing up the "x real life racial group tests lower" bit - it's not really relevent to a discussion about non-human vs. human intelligence and you're only confusing people with it.
Arethusa
May 13 2005, 03:50 PM
QUOTE (Critias) |
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 01:44 AM) | I keep bringing up blacks scoring lower because it is a very good example of a societal subgroup that tests consistently worse than another group with absolutely no relation to capability; it has everything to do with socioeconomic conditions. |
Right. Except that blacks vs. whites is not the same as orks vs. trolls vs. humans vs. elves. One is a societal subgroup -- blacks, IRL -- but orks/trolls/whatever aren't only societal subgroups, they are truly different creatures than humans. It's hard for us to grasp that (as they are all able to breed with one another, the basic anatomy remains largely the same, etc), but it's a simple fact. They gestate for different time periods, for pete's sake. The have visibly different skin colorations, dental patterns, skeletal structures. They age and mature at different rates than humans. They aren't human beings. Blacks are.
There's a world of difference there. It's funny, but it would almost be easier for some centuries-old (now considered crackpot) doctor to understand the ork/troll/human/elf/dwarf relationship than it is for us, today, as modern human beings. We've had drilled into us for so long that skin color doesn't matter that it's genuinely hard to us, as reasonable human beings to grasp that orks and trolls aren't just mexicans or blacks or asians. They are not human, in the same way that racially-motivated doctors a few hundred years ago insisted that blacks (etc) weren't human (only the simple fact is that, in the SR game world, it's a true statement, not a racist statement).
Stop comparing modern day IQ scores between groups of people differentiated only by social/economic factors and skin pigmentation to game-world-based Intelligence scores between groups of metapeople that are differentiated by quite a bit more than how tan they are. Apples and oranges.
|
Critias, I expect better from you. Go back and reread my post.
Apathy
May 13 2005, 05:01 PM
QUOTE |
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 01:44 AM) I keep bringing up blacks scoring lower because it is a very good example of a societal subgroup that tests consistently worse than another group with absolutely no relation to capability; it has everything to do with socioeconomic conditions. |
Why does the performance of a human subgroup (i.e. genetically the same) in a skill test (not a true attribute measurement) in RL have anything to do with the attribute modifiers of a non-human (i.e. not genetically the same) race in a roleplaying game?
Nikoli
May 13 2005, 06:57 PM
Here's a thought:
When you raise an attribute, the price goes up for the next highest level, right?
Why not remove the restriction to maximums in the mental categories, but change the karmic modifier for different races.
That way, elves aren't actually more charismatic than a human (the baseline creature) they simply have a natural aptitude to develop those traits (hence a reduced cost for improving that attribute). A troll or ork have more difficulty inschool due to predjudice, socially and economically, so they have to work harder on their own to achieve the development that the other students are being bolstered for by the teacher.
In the end, a troll could be as smart as the smartest human, they just gotta work harder to get there.
Arethusa
May 13 2005, 07:21 PM
QUOTE (Apathy @ May 13 2005, 12:01 PM) |
QUOTE | QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 01:44 AM) I keep bringing up blacks scoring lower because it is a very good example of a societal subgroup that tests consistently worse than another group with absolutely no relation to capability; it has everything to do with socioeconomic conditions. |
Why does the performance of a human subgroup (i.e. genetically the same) in a skill test (not a true attribute measurement) in RL have anything to do with the attribute modifiers of a non-human (i.e. not genetically the same) race in a roleplaying game?
|
Nothing! It has nothing to do with it! Congratulations! You figured it out!
For god's sake, does anyone here (aside from Kage, apparently) actually read? I explicitly stated that when you make statements like "the average troll is dumber," you are referring to a shift in normal distribution— a real phenomenon that has no necessary relation to absolute intelligence, as illustrated by the black v. white IQ score averages. I then went on to further explain that this is not in the least what the game or its mechanics indicate by giving a race a negative Intelligence modifier. For the last time: -2 Intelligence is not a shift in average intelligence. It is a shift in absolute intelligence. Trolls are dumber. STOP CONFUSING THESE.
[edit]
Nikoli: actually really like the idea of altering progressive costs instead of hard caps. Doesn't seem likely it'll show up in SR4, but it's definitely a more interesting way of handling it.
Sharaloth
May 13 2005, 07:46 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
For god's sake, does anyone here (aside from Kage, apparently) actually read? I explicitly stated that when you make statements like "the average troll is dumber," you are referring to a shift in normal distribution— a real phenomenon that has no necessary relation to absolute intelligence, as illustrated by the black v. white IQ score averages. I then went on to further explain that this is not in the least what the game or its mechanics indicate by giving a race a negative Intelligence modifier. For the last time: -2 Intelligence is not a shift in average intelligence. It is a shift in absolute intelligence. Trolls are dumber. STOP CONFUSING THESE. |
The statments on averages are still accurate, though. Even in absolute terms, there is an average that works out, and is in fact explicitly stated within the stat level distribution mechanic of the game. 3 is average human, 1-2 is average troll, therefore the average human (having the average Int score of 3, regardless of actual IQ, test scores, or whatever else might be used in RL to measure this) is smarter than the average troll (Int 1, using the -2 to Int and putting the same attribute points into Intelligence as the average human, still regardless of test scores, etc). Thus the average Troll is dumber than the average human.
Trolls are not, however, absolutely dumber than humans. The stupidest (and not mentally damaged) Troll is just as stupid as the stupidest (and not mentally damaged) Human, and not a whit stupider (Int 1 on both counts). The Smartest possible Troll may not be able to match the smartest possible human, but they are still smarter than the VAST majority of humans. Thus the statement 'Trolls are Dumber' is not correct without appropriate modifiers, such as 'many' or 'a great deal' or even 'most', and the addition 'than the average human' to the end.
Thus, 'The average troll is dumber than the average human' is an accurate statement, and has shit all to do with racial politics of modern non-SR life. This isn't a reference to normal distribution beyond the fact that in a normal distribution the average of Trolls WILL come out below the average of Humans. The normal distribution of test scores between blacks and whites are irrelevant, because the mechanics of SR are pretty clear that they both will have an average Int of 3.
The average Troll (and Ork, but less noticeably) IS dumber than the average human. In terms of absolute intelligence, Trolls cap out lower than the absolute max for humans, but retain the same absolute minimum, giving them free reign up to and including above-human-average intelligence. So, in absolute terms? Humans have a higher absolute maximum, but are not inherently more intelligent in absolute terms, only in averages.
Apathy
May 13 2005, 08:02 PM
QUOTE |
I explicitly stated that when you make statements like "the average troll is dumber," you are referring to a shift in normal distribution— a real phenomenon that has no necessary relation to absolute intelligence, as illustrated by the black v. white IQ score averages. |
I would contend that IQ score averages are not an indicator of absolute intelligence. Instead, I believe that IQ scores reflect the tester's skill at a variety of adademic, learned tasks (math, vocabulary, etc.). If you had read my response, you would have seen that.
QUOTE |
For the last time: -2 Intelligence is not a shift in average intelligence. It is a shift in absolute intelligence. |
I've never argued with this. However, a modifier to absolute intelligence does not preclude differences in average intelligence as well. Assuming (always dangerous) that other races have intelligence levels that vary through their possible max and min ranges following a typical bell curve like humans do would point to orcs and trolls having a lower average intelligence as well as a lower absolute intelligence. I've seen nothing in canon material or in the vast majority of the fluff material that would dispute this.
I never disputed this either. I agree completely.
It seems to me that for someone who complains so much about others not reading his posts closely, you don't really read our responses very closely either...
Charon
May 13 2005, 09:12 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 02:21 PM) |
For the last time: -2 Intelligence is not a shift in average intelligence. It is a shift in absolute intelligence. Trolls are dumber. STOP CONFUSING THESE. |
-2 or -1 to intelligence is an absolute shift in intelligence. It also results in an average troll or orc being on average dumber than a human, which was my original statement.
STOP THIS HISSY FIT.
I really don't see what it added to my original post.
mmu1
May 13 2005, 10:43 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
Nothing! It has nothing to do with it! Congratulations! You figured it out!
For god's sake, does anyone here (aside from Kage, apparently) actually read? I explicitly stated that when you make statements like "the average troll is dumber," you are referring to a shift in normal distribution— a real phenomenon that has no necessary relation to absolute intelligence, as illustrated by the black v. white IQ score averages. I then went on to further explain that this is not in the least what the game or its mechanics indicate by giving a race a negative Intelligence modifier. For the last time: -2 Intelligence is not a shift in average intelligence. It is a shift in absolute intelligence. Trolls are dumber. STOP CONFUSING THESE. |
I think what's confusing people is that while I guess you're right about your definitions, it's sort of hard to see how it's actually relevant to the subject at hand, and what point, if any, you're trying to make, anymore.
Are you saying that it's actually impossible to have two sentient races with a difference in absoloute intelligence?
What is it that bothers you about the SR stat adjustments, given that the character generation system does NOT model a normal distribution of stats to begin with - so who cares if the stat adjustments reflect a change in normal distribution or not?
Arethusa
May 13 2005, 10:53 PM
QUOTE (mmu1) |
Are you saying that it's actually impossible to have two sentient races with a difference in absoloute intelligence? |
No. Where did you get that impression in anything I said? As I said repeatedly, there is a distinction between normal distribution and absolute intelligence. Every time someone says "the average troll is dumber," he is referring to the former while the rules indicate the latter— which, let me be clear, does not preclude also a shift in relative normal distribution of intelligence across a population. In fact, it pretty much demands it. But it is a separate phenomenon, which I desperately tried to illustrate by repeatedly pointing out that it has happened many, many times in the real world to ethnic subgroups without any shift in absolute intelligence. But everyone ran off talking about racism instead.
My personal opinions on sentience, intelligence, and the game's rather shoddy handling of both and their surrounding issues are really not pertinent to anything I've been saying for the past two pages.
mmu1
May 13 2005, 11:56 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa @ May 13 2005, 05:53 PM) |
QUOTE (mmu1) | Are you saying that it's actually impossible to have two sentient races with a difference in absoloute intelligence? |
No. Where did you get that impression in anything I said? As I said repeatedly, there is a distinction between normal distribution and absolute intelligence. Every time someone says "the average troll is dumber," he is referring to the former while the rules indicate the latter— which, let me be clear, does not preclude also a shift in relative normal distribution of intelligence across a population. In fact, it pretty much demands it. But it is a separate phenomenon, which I desperately tried to illustrate by repeatedly pointing out that it has happened many, many times in the real world to ethnic subgroups without any shift in absolute intelligence. But everyone ran off talking about racism instead.
My personal opinions on sentience, intelligence, and the game's rather shoddy handling of both and their surrounding issues are really not pertinent to anything I've been saying for the past two pages.
|
Nowhere, really - I got the distinction from the get-go (but not why you were so worked up about it, since for the purpose of the discussion it wasn't all that relevant), and assumed that since we're on page 4 and you're still going on about it, there had to be some other point I missed, and was trying to guess what it might be.
Crimson Jack
May 14 2005, 02:40 AM
I too have been trying to figure out what the missing point was in all of this, outside of it being that most everyone in this thread doesn't get it.
TenTonHammer
May 14 2005, 03:32 AM
Ok, i've been away from SR for a couple years, since i joined the military. (I have alot of the older books,you know the ones with the bad drawings on the covers and alot of the new books, i also read them all the time) But there are ways to show the benefits and detractors for each race.
INT - General- This is the era of Trideo, Simsense, and BTL. Not the age of the graphic Novel. (EX- Ask your mother the last book she read, and how long ago that was). And this is the age of the TV. Most people even nowadays don't utilize the internet and its information and its at our fingertips. (Your reading SR stuff, this is the reason why we dont have cold fusion)
Magic - Its everywhere, it helped change the human race, and everything else. Im sure there was atleast one scientist with an INT 6, that got dropped to INT 4 (Troll) when the "Goblinization" hit. Why not? Its SR, theres a "Hand of God". Why might he have changed? Maybe his synapses fired slower, maybe it takes more coordination and uses a different part of his brain or more brain to do the simple things, we take for granted.
Trolls- -2 INT - Harsh yes. Your still the 1% of the population. Things just don't go your way. WoW! awesome your trolls in school! Find a Desk that fits you! They got one?! Great. Now tell the coach you don't wanna play on their team. Im not saying Jocks are dumb, but if you have natural talent to crush people on the field, homework is a far second. Got a "turtle" with a huge keyboard or a datajack? Good, you educated yourself off the internet, your book smart. But all that studying left you no time for practical application. And Prac App, by far is the best education you can get. EX- Study Martial Arts from the Internet, then go try to beat up Ken Shamrock, even though hes kinda past his prime, your toast. (Maybe Trolls "devolved" into a more primal being)
Orks - 1 INT. Could be worse. Orks Deviated from humans, but not as drastically as Trolls did. Slightly taller, Tusks, hardier and stronger. "Easier" to intermingle. School is possible, well besides racism. Same things can pretty much be applied to the Ork as the Troll. Synapses, lack of grey matter, etc.
For what its worth thats my take on things. Flame all you want but thats how i've seen it and thats how i've played it.
Me, ill take humans anyday. You might get the advantage now, but later on Karma is a runners best friend. And Humans get the best of it.
Im also new here so i hope you enjoy my post
DrJest
May 15 2005, 09:37 AM
I was going to suggest changing attribute modifiers during character generation to limit modifiers... so your starting troll could buy a Body of 11 but only an Intelligence of 4... but then I suppose that doesn't really help matters, does it?
Crusher Bob
May 15 2005, 10:44 AM
The main problem I have with the stat modifiers is tie up with the granularity of the SR stats.
Assuming humans intelligence is distributed as follows:
1 5 %
2 15 %
3 30 %
4 30 %
5 15 %
6 5 %
avg int 3.5
Then the distribution for trolls looks like:
1 50 %
2 30 %
3 15 %
4 5 %
avg int 1.75
Using these numbers, 50% of trolls are doing good to just walk and chew gum at the same time.
I wish the stat spread was larger so normal distributions would apply to any of the races...
toturi
May 15 2005, 02:45 PM
Errr... can you explain why 50% of trolls assigned 3 to their Intelligence? Why can't it be:
1 15%
2 35%
3 35%
4 15%
Herald of Verjigorm
May 15 2005, 03:25 PM
I think that was because 50% of the hypothetical humans put 3 or less points into intelligence.