Wounded Ronin
Jun 21 2005, 03:30 AM
So, while surfing the web, I happened to stumble upon the blog of one of those poor youths who is about to be sent to a crazy religious de-gaying camp by his parents who are convinced that doing so is necessary to save his soul, or something.
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...=20050611091251You've heard of them before; those camps that basically use classical brainwashing to deal with supposed "problem children", and which usually charge a lot of money, and which tend to be run by very strange head-case individuals.
QUOTE |
1. LIA wants to encourage each client, male and female, by affirming his/her gender identity. LIA also wants each client to pursue integrity in all of his/her actions and appearances. Therefore, any belongings, appearances, clothing, actions, or humor that might connect a client to an inappropriate past are excluded from the program. These hindrances are called False Images (FI¹s). FI behavior may include hyper-masculinity, seductive clothing, mannish/boyish attire (on women), excessive jewelry (on men), mascoting, and "campy" or gay/lesbian behavior and talk.
|
QUOTE |
2. No sexual/emotional misconduct. Any temptations, fantasies, or dreams are to be presented to one¹s staff worker only. Sexual misconduct includes viewing pornography, visiting an adult bookstore, emotional dependency, voyeurism, stalking, masturbation, mutual masturbation, or any form of genital or sexual contact with another person. Sexual temptation, as well as the above, is not to be discussed between clients. This includes MI's (Moral Inventories) written on current sexual struggles or temptations).
|
QUOTE |
6. Clients may have no contact with anyone who has left the program prior to graduating without the blessing of the staff to do so. Clients may address off-limit persons they inadvertently encounter with a polite "hello" only.
|
So, naturally, when reading this blog, my first reaction is, "If this kid were actually a musclar, well-trained ninja, instead of a terrified persecuted teenager, he could escape!" And naturally my thoughts of ninja made me think of the 1980s, and the 1980s in turn made me think of Shadowrun.
I thought, "Wouldn't it be funny if the PCs got hired to rescue one particular kid from a religious looney de-gaying camp somewhere in CAS? I've got it all figured out. Some rich Seattle exec has a cousin or something in CAS whose psychotic parents have sent to a de-gaying camp. The rich Seattle exec decides it would be fun to pee in the cheerios of his detested Southern relatives so he decides to flex some executive rich man muscle and send Shadowrunners to yoink the kid out from under the noses of said parents!"
But then I realized that that would be sort of boring, in and of itself. I mean, the idea would be kind of funny, but it would be too easy. How could a GM possibly kill off the PCs with a mission like that?
So...what if the de-gaying camp is actually run by a megalomaniacal Baptist shaman, and he's got a cult of personality where the entire surrounding town supports him? The PCs come in, and everyone in town is deceptively friendly. There's no real problem until anyone in town figures out what they're there to do; all of a sudden the formerly friendly and hospitable town turns on them with shotguns and hunting rifles. It'd be like Mogidishu, except with shotguns and hunting rifles instead of old AKs.
And then, once the PCs succeed in penetrating the camp, the crazy shaman has a bunch of follower shamans, and there's the whole challenge of taking out a group of shamans without harming the innocent kids collaterally.
The best part of this is that it would allow both the combat type characters *and* the "face" characters to shine. Before the town turns hostile, there's plenty of room for information gathering and whatnot by the "face" characters.
Lindt
Jun 21 2005, 03:48 AM
Thats nothing to say of the half crazed free spirit that said megalomaniacal Baptist shaman has bee listining to.
Sounds like it would make a great silly game.
Arethusa
Jun 21 2005, 04:01 AM
As much as I'd prefer a dark, realistic portrayal of the scenario, there's an amount of potential for a lightweight slapstick run, as you've outlined.
That blog is, for obvious reasons, quite sad and about as disgusting.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 04:10 AM
That's not nearly as bad as it could have been. I had a friend who was sent to a reeducation camp in exactly that sort of style for having religious differences with her parents, one of the ones that's more like a prison camp than anything else (can't leave the area, guards and walls and so on and so forth). They showed up and took her away at about 3:30 AM. When we next got in touch with her nearly a year later, we found out that the program is quite effective, all things considered.
~J
Smiley
Jun 21 2005, 04:18 AM
I hate people.
SpasticTeapot
Jun 21 2005, 04:27 AM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
As much as I'd prefer a dark, realistic portrayal of the scenario, there's an amount of potential for a lightweight slapstick run, as you've outlined.
That blog is, for obvious reasons, quite sad and about as disgusting. |
I've seen the gross atrocities comitted in the name of "religion", and I think I'm going to be using that in the run I intend to do tomorrow.
Damn, I hate religion.
Arethusa
Jun 21 2005, 04:36 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
That's not nearly as bad as it could have been. I had a friend who was sent to a reeducation camp in exactly that sort of style for having religious differences with her parents, one of the ones that's more like a prison camp than anything else (can't leave the area, guards and walls and so on and so forth). They showed up and took her away at about 3:30 AM. When we next got in touch with her nearly a year later, we found out that the program is quite effective, all things considered.
~J |
Yeah, I am aware. Sad and disgusting it is, but not really disturbing. Not relative to lots of the other stuff out there, anyway.
And I'm sorry for your friend.
SpasticTeapot
Jun 21 2005, 04:42 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
That's not nearly as bad as it could have been. I had a friend who was sent to a reeducation camp in exactly that sort of style for having religious differences with her parents, one of the ones that's more like a prison camp than anything else (can't leave the area, guards and walls and so on and so forth). They showed up and took her away at about 3:30 AM. When we next got in touch with her nearly a year later, we found out that the program is quite effective, all things considered.
~J |
Sure it is. I mean, what could be bad about being emotionally ground down to a pulp so you may be sculpted in the hideous image of your parents?
Those who said "Learn from history, or you are doomed to repeat it" were only all too accurate.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 04:49 AM
QUOTE (SpasticTeapot) |
Sure it is. I mean, what could be bad about being emotionally ground down to a pulp so you may be sculpted in the hideous image of your parents? Those who said "Learn from history, or you are doomed to repeat it" were only all too accurate. |
The rules included provisions for doing things that were not inside the walls of the facility, and directions for family members when a staff member is not present. That makes me assume that the people inside see the outside without staff members present occasionally. That pretty much automatically makes it not as bad as what I was expecting, though that's kinda like saying that getting only one kneecap blown off isn't as bad as having them both go.
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
And I'm sorry for your friend. |
Thanks. I hadn't realized that I was still this angry about it.
~J
Arethusa
Jun 21 2005, 04:51 AM
QUOTE (SpasticTeapot) |
Sure it is. I mean, what could be bad about being emotionally ground down to a pulp so you may be sculpted in the hideous image of your parents? Those who said "Learn from history, or you are doomed to repeat it" were only all too accurate. |
He didn't say it wasn't bad. He said it was pretty mild compared to the other wonderful inhumanities carried out in the name of Jesus in this country. And he is right. What that kid is being put through is undeniably wrong and twisted, but it could be a lot worse.
And it was Santayana.
Krazy
Jun 21 2005, 05:17 AM
gotta trust people to corrupt anything they can get their hands on. (grabs nomex undies) but I see no diffrence in how people have abused the name of Christ to how they have abused in the name of culture, art or even justice.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 05:19 AM
Justice you've got a point, but the name of religion seems to come up pretty often compared to the others.
I know people who have kept it a good thing, but it's been disproportionately involved in some really nasty stuff.
~J
SpasticTeapot
Jun 21 2005, 05:22 AM
You know, I've got a twitchy street samurai and a troll PhysAd who makes mincemeat of anything that goes at him. Is it a bad thing that I like the concept of this run turning into a bloodbath?
mfb
Jun 21 2005, 05:24 AM
the NAN is perfect for this--or rather, the 'white reservations' that dot much of the NAN. they're each effectively a sovereign nation with their own laws.
Arethusa
Jun 21 2005, 05:29 AM
QUOTE (Krazy @ Jun 21 2005, 01:17 AM) |
gotta trust people to corrupt anything they can get their hands on. (grabs nomex undies) but I see no diffrence in how people have abused the name of Christ to how they have abused in the name of culture, art or even justice. |
Justice, I can agree with, but just how many atricities can you think of that have been carried out in the name of arts and culture? There is potential for abuse everywhere, yes, and that speaks more of humanity than it does of justice or religion, but I think you're stretching it a bit thin when you get to art and culture.
QUOTE (SpasticTeapot) |
You know, I've got a twitchy street samurai and a troll PhysAd who makes mincemeat of anything that goes at him. Is it a bad thing that I like the concept of this run turning into a bloodbath? |
Yes. There is something vaguely offensive about taking a genuine, serious issue, and reducing all its ethical dillemas and complexities to a John Woo braindead bloodbath.
Krazy
Jun 21 2005, 05:28 AM
Kage, I think that's because religious people tend to take credit for it more often. in matters of culture or justice, espesialy culture, people tend not to take credit for damaging ideas, they just help perpetuate them. "fashion" has done a lot of damage to the self image of many people, but there are none who will stand and say that they are right to be causing said damage, but if a religious fanatic kills in the name of their faith, they want people to know. am I making sense?
Fresno Bob
Jun 21 2005, 06:39 AM
QUOTE (Krazy) |
Kage, I think that's because religious people tend to take credit for it more often. in matters of culture or justice, espesialy culture, people tend not to take credit for damaging ideas, they just help perpetuate them. "fashion" has done a lot of damage to the self image of many people, but there are none who will stand and say that they are right to be causing said damage, but if a religious fanatic kills in the name of their faith, they want people to know. am I making sense? |
You're making sense, but that doesn't necessarily mean you're right. While fashion did present the concept of heroin chic, fashion designers never made camps for women to get forced into and starved to 90 pounds, or anything like that. Anybody who did that, did that voluntarily, under the erroneous assumption that thats the body type men find most attractive, even though superskinny models were really just put forth as human coat racks that designers could slap a bunch of clothes onto and then parade down the runway.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 21 2005, 06:39 AM
Spastic: No, you're not alone. Not alone at all. I've read about other camps like this. They make my blood boil, and I want to see the blood of those responsible - both the parents assinine enough to send their children here, and the moral void wastes-of-space-and-sperm who run and work those places - run and flow.
Hell, I was imagining performing Shadowruns against these kinds of places before I ever HEARD of Shadowrun. *fumes.*
This stuff is nothing short of emotional abuse and brainwashing. Any psychologist NTO in the pocket of the camp administrator will tell you that. How do these places get away with their continued existance?!
So yeah. I think that would be a great Run. Hell, my characters would do it for the price of ammo and gear.
Crusher Bob
Jun 21 2005, 09:56 AM
Well I'm sure that most of the camp administrators and staff are pretty healthy and the seond hand organ market is booming... The whole project could be self financing, all you need is a refrigerated van and you are good to go.
Critias
Jun 21 2005, 10:12 AM
Yup. Nothing says "moral high ground like "premeditated mass murder."
blakkie
Jun 21 2005, 10:21 AM
If you Google and then follow the links you'll see that Love In Action:Refuge is an "out-patient" program that is 2 weeks long plus an exta 6 weeks. So you go home at the end of the day. Didn't see any info on what you do if you live outside of commuting distance.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 21 2005, 10:20 AM
Critias is right...
Crusher? You need to sieze some moral high ground that does
not lay on the artilliary range.
No, we won't be doing any organ-harvesting. Besides, once me and my Ingram Smartgun get through with them, their organs won't be in such crisp condition.
That said, if we don't have to make it a smash, grab, and run like hell op (IE: race in with a passenger-converted T-bird, get the kids and RUN,) I woulden't be adverse to taking a dip into their bank accounts.
ShadowDragon8685
Jun 21 2005, 10:22 AM
Blakkie: As this crap goes, that's somewhat moderate.
I heard of one in Jamaca where it's like a prison. They have huge Jamacan guards to surpress any individuality, and they give out a list of 'escort services' that are happy to escort your child to the airport. They advise that the child be unaware of his departure until the last minute, and be 'escorted' in the middle of the night.
Read that: Hire a bunch of goons to come and kidnap your child in the middle of the night.
Aku
Jun 21 2005, 11:07 AM
wow, crazzzzzzzzziness. I dont even have to read the blog, but ya know, if this was really ment to "de=gay" someone, you would think the place would ENCOURAGE things like mutual masterbation with members of the oppisite sex, not stimy it.
Bulldrek i call!
hermit
Jun 21 2005, 11:55 AM
Well, it is kind of accepted in US culture to reeducate people by brainwashing, be it in some sort of detention camp or in the army, isn't it? I mean, boot camps are a firm part of the US penal system, for all I know, and the indoctrination Marines are put through is pretty close to brain washing, too. Yet both options are viable, accepted and even cherished by the general populace.
That encourages such nut jobs, naturally. I mean, if the state can brainwash (break and remake, as the boot camps call their program) youths to 'fix' them, why can't religious organisations, too?
On a side note, Scientology operates two such camps, and a ship that is essentially a mobile camp, where dissenters are brought to from all Scientology chapters, worldwide, so it's not just *christian* nuts. It's arrogant fundamentalists in general.
The worst part is that de-gaying never works. Supressing desires can be learnt, but orientation cannot be changed, as all scientific evidence shows. So this is, in essence, torture of children so that parents feel better.
nick012000
Jun 21 2005, 11:56 AM
All the more reason to end it in a shower of blood and spent casings, then.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 12:10 PM
Anyone for a field trip to Georgia?
~J
hermit
Jun 21 2005, 12:24 PM
Also, while we're at the topic of religious nut job runs, why not base a run on
this sect.
The Johnson would be one of those outcast sons who wants to rescue his sister from being married the 20th wife to the current prophet (she's 15).
Mormons have a special status in Sioux (or was it Ute?). According to NAN, they are treated effectively as a tribe there. I would guess they have even more leeway to abuse their children there than they do now.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 12:34 PM
Ute. They're mostly left alone as long as they don't bother the real government.
~J
blakkie
Jun 21 2005, 12:39 PM
I'm looking back through that Blog's history and there is basically nothing before May 29th, just a couple of questionnaires filled out. One on Jan 12, and another on May 1. I suppose there could be some sort of online community he was involved in to give context, but something feels....kinda wierd. Maybe it's just my SR induced paranoia, but i'm picking up a bad Johnson vibe.
Crusher Bob
Jun 21 2005, 01:11 PM
Moral high ground? I was just looking for an excuse...

Another thing worth noting is that this will almost certainly be a 'beer and pretzel' run for a team of PCs. Even starting runners should easily have the capability to do this. Which means the pay probably won't be that good. You'll just have to make up for it with a warm fuzzy feeling (and maybe some contact points) (and your refrigerated van full of grade A internal organs, of course).
It's obvious that crime dosen't pay
Nikoli
Jun 21 2005, 01:23 PM
These sorts of camps have existed for a long time, sad to say. Yes, it is brain washing, yes, it is needless torture for the children involved. I have a deep sadness for the parents that are so misguided that they feel this is necessary and deeper still for the children used in this manner.
On a shadowrun-esque note, I see this more as a burgeoning hive type scenario. especially an Ant hive. The person that runs the camp is a deluded religious nut (whatever faith you choose as there are zealous nut jobs in any denomination) but not infested with a bug spirit, the head councilor on the other hand is, and with the help of the Ant queen has deluded the Figure-head into believeing that the children that went missing ran away (the kids that merged and could no longer pass as human are actually working on a literal hive under the camp) while the nearly "cured" kids are just happy if regimented, organized and almost drone like in mannerisms. these kids go out and help bring in more children (by finding the ones with the "bad" behavior and giving their parents the pamphlets for the camp.) The children that find out and for whatever reason resist the merge are used as food for the hive below or perhaps organ legged to pay for the rising costs in summoning materials.
Crusher Bob
Jun 21 2005, 01:33 PM
The problem I have with adding bugs to the situation is that it removes any moral grey areas that might have been present. Bugs have 'BAD' stamped right their on their foreheads, so any moral ambuguity you have have about using 'necessary force' on the camp guards (or whatever else you are planning to do) goes right out the window.
Notice how people reacted to my suggestion to 'just go in an organleg all those responsible', even though the re-education camp is bad, the board members still think my organleggin solution is a bit extreme. If I had suggested going into a bug hive and killing all the bugs, no one would have even batted an eye.
It also turns away from the angle of 'mans inhumanity to man', it not real people that are brainwasing the kids, it bugs, and its okay to kill them. Your character dosen't have to wake up at night dreaming about those Stockholm sysdrome kids he had to gun down, they were just bugs, no big deal.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 01:37 PM
I'd be all for organlegging the humans. Bugs, on the other hand, have done nothing wrong—they're just perpetuating their own survival. What right do we have to destroy them just because they happen to feed on us?
~J
Krazy
Jun 21 2005, 01:54 PM
becasuse I'm the top of the food chain and they need to be remined of that? I admit that people do cause "volintary" harm to themselves. I just doesn't seem much diffrent from zelots doing it to someone else.
(funny how everyone here is pissed right off about it and is planning shadowruns.) I got a better idea tell people not to support groups the ACLU which support these camps, and peoples right to maintain them. and maybe even do something for real, like write letters or protest?
Smiley
Jun 21 2005, 01:56 PM
QUOTE (hermit @ Jun 21 2005, 06:55 AM) |
Well, it is kind of accepted in US culture to reeducate people by brainwashing, be it in some sort of detention camp or in the army, isn't it? I mean, boot camps are a firm part of the US penal system, for all I know, and the indoctrination Marines are put through is pretty close to brain washing, too. |
That's just not true. I went through Marine Corps boot camp and I'm still the same person I was before. To compare boot camp and the de-gaying camp is ignorant and is over-generalizing. Yes, there are USMC recruits that take it waaaay too far and drop off the deep end, but boot camp itself is nothing like this religious gulag. The purpose is to teach and train, not re-educate. I know it sounds like I'm splitting hairs, but there really IS a big difference.
QUOTE (hermit) |
Mormons have a special status in Sioux (or was it Ute?). According to NAN, they are treated effectively as a tribe there. I would guess they have even more leeway to abuse their children there than they do now. |
I also grew up Mormon and they ARE guilty of brainwashing.
Even now when someone says my pre-conditioned codeword, I'm forced to give 10% of whatever I have on me to the nearest church and start a sing-along.
Smiley
Jun 21 2005, 01:59 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Anyone for a field trip to Georgia?
~J |
P.S. - I'm ashamed it's my adopted state that's the problem. I apologize on behalf of the non-crazy residents.
Kagetenshi
Jun 21 2005, 02:04 PM
QUOTE (Krazy) |
becasuse I'm the top of the food chain |
Not any more.
QUOTE (Krazy @ Jun 21 2005, 08:54 AM) |
I got a better idea tell people not to support groups the ACLU which support these camps, and peoples right to maintain them. |
You make two statements here. One is arguably true, one is false. The two are, contrary to what first impressions may lead one to believe, almost entirely unrelated. I'll leave you to work out the details.
QUOTE (Krazy) |
and maybe even do something for real, like write letters or protest? |
Because the people who fund these camps are going to be real intimidated by someone who is ideologically not aligned with them, and the camps themselves are going to try real hard to get someone who isn't a potential customer to be happy with them.
QUOTE (Smiley) |
P.S. - I'm ashamed it's my adopted state that's the problem. I apologize on behalf of the non-crazy residents. |
We don't go in for guilt by association here. Unless it's D20, that is.
~J
Austere Emancipator
Jun 21 2005, 02:11 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
I'd be all for organlegging the humans. Bugs, on the other hand, have done nothing wrong—they're just perpetuating their own survival. What right do we have to destroy them just because they happen to feed on us? |
You are in the minority there. Average Joe will probably feel every-so-slightly more squeemish about slaughtering humans (no matter how fucked up in the head the particular human is) than about destroying insect-spirit-thingies.
Still, most of the people in and around the camp don't need to know anything about the spirits, nor do they actually have to be wossnamed. Infested? Inhabited? Whatever. Most shadowrunners will feel about the same amount of squeemishness towards slaughtering guards working for religious fuckers as towards slaughtering guards who think they work for religious fuckers but actually work for bug spirits. That amount may round off to zero in many cases, however.
Krazy
Jun 21 2005, 02:18 PM
so, if they arn't intimidated by people who arn't alinened withthem, use what they fear. CNN? document evidence that proves people are being mistreated. from the outside the bible college I went to looked a lot like these camps, it was in a small town, far away from where everyone lived. everyone was changed in some way because of it. of course that went with good food, great people and a great learning enviroment. It just seems to me that all this passion over these camp could be put to real use.
Jrayjoker
Jun 21 2005, 02:41 PM
Hell, I went to a small, religous college in a small town that encouraged daily religious service attendance, prohibited certain behavious (i.e. drinking and fraternizing after hours), etc., etc., etc. I wasn't any more brainwashed than Smiley was by the USMC.
If you read the literature the college put out you could come to the conclusion that it was fanatical, though.
Degaying camps are perhaps the polar opposite of my view/practice/faith as a Christian. Am I angered by the mere concept? Yes. But it makes me sad more than anything.
Apathy
Jun 21 2005, 02:46 PM
This reminds me of a run I GM'd one time where parents hired a group of shadowrunners to kidnap their kid, who had run away and joined a cult, and the cult-leader hired my runners to kidnap her back.
Jrayjoker
Jun 21 2005, 02:54 PM
They were looking for a certain level of moral ambiguity....
mfb
Jun 21 2005, 03:10 PM
boot camp doesn't play any part in the US penal system that i'm aware of. basic training includes indoctrination, sure, but it's far too ineffective to be called 'brainwashing'. it's more an introduction to the culture that permeates the military.
Jrayjoker
Jun 21 2005, 03:15 PM
QUOTE (mfb) |
boot camp doesn't play any part in the US penal system that i'm aware of. basic training includes indoctrination, sure, but it's far too ineffective to be called 'brainwashing'. it's more an introduction to the culture that permeates the military. |
There are some pilot programs where it does play a role. Boot camps for Meth abusers and delinquent kids are fairly common, but in their experimental stages in Minnesota right now.
Austere Emancipator
Jun 21 2005, 03:16 PM
So how about a run against an
Air Force Academy, then?
mfb
Jun 21 2005, 03:26 PM
are those actual first-nine (or so)-weeks-in-the-military boot camps, or just guys who shout at you and make you do exercises?
Bigity
Jun 21 2005, 03:27 PM
He's thinking about non-military boot camps.
The services don't want some meth-addict anymore then anyone else.
The other stuff I'm not going to get into.
Lindt
Jun 21 2005, 03:32 PM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
*snip* Justice, I can agree with, but just how many atricities can you think of that have been carried out in the name of arts and culture? *snip* |
Proven fact that religin has caused more and bloodier wars then any other 'thing' in mankinds history. But art? For some reason I dont see art as something people wage pitched battles over. [proof] Or at least an example.
Yeah, after reading that I was about ready to go bust some brainwashed heads. Kage, man my condolances, it shows what can get away without being called a cult as long as its under the right religion...
Jrayjoker
Jun 21 2005, 03:40 PM
QUOTE (mfb) |
are those actual first-nine (or so)-weeks-in-the-military boot camps, or just guys who shout at you and make you do exercises? |
Modeled after military boot camps. Vocational training, calesthenics, rigid schedule, keep you busy til you drop from exhaustion at night. THat kind of thing.