mintcar
Feb 3 2006, 08:36 PM
Thanks for clearing that up. Sure sounds like bull

.
SL James
Feb 3 2006, 10:09 PM
QUOTE (mintcar) |
Still, your unreasonable hate is just the dark side talking . |
Dark side, my ass. Just because I am a shining ball of pure hate does mean that my dislike of SK's work product is unreasonable. I've laid out my perfectly rational explanations for why I don't like his work on several occassions, as have others to the point that he actually posted his once and only time on this board's incarnation just to reply to one such comment.
As a person, he's a perfectly decent guy who I got along with years ago. As an author, I think his work product has dragged the game down considerably.
QUOTE (Bull) |
He's also a forum member, and due a little respect. You don't have to like he work, but you do have to be polite regarding him. This is your guys' last warning on the subject.
Bull |
Yeah, whatever dude. I go out of my way to be polite or at least decent and not spewing foam at the mouth angry because it would be counterproductive. But, hey, I've already said this exact thing before about six months ago.
fistandantilus4.0
Feb 4 2006, 05:29 AM
QUOTE (JM Hardy) |
I don't like to give away much beforehand (though, since the book cover is on Amazon, I hope the plot summary is soon to follow), but the book's about a former combat mage named Bannickburn who has lost power and really wants it back, and how he runs into some Seattle folk who are really good at manipulating people who want power.
Jason H. |
I'm really hoping that this one will be the end to the "runner with the heart of gold " syndrome that seems to fill most of the SR novels out there. I'd like a little more criminal in my criminals please. Oh, and caffiene, if that isn't too much to ask.
Deadjester
Feb 5 2006, 02:40 PM
I have read the newest two book by SK and while I think they are a good instruction manuals for noobies, as books they left me feeling cheated.
Not enough about the characters are known so that you can get a good feel for them and it all feels rushed.
And I think for the price you pay for those books you get robbed. The printing is larger then normal and the space between the lines are pretty large which probably added another 40 pages to the book that it should not have.
Paid full price for what amounts to a book that is just larger then a short story.
For SR books one of my favorit series (I forget the titles) was written about this guy Sam looking for his sister and he ended up being the golden boy for the totem dog and ended up with the babe Heart.
But you got to meet all sorts of charcters and see alot of how the shadows worked on small and grand scale.
THAT was a real series.
BookWyrm
Feb 6 2006, 05:49 AM
I think that's the novel Lone Wolf by Nigel D. Findley.
PBTHHHHT
Feb 6 2006, 06:23 AM
wrong, that series is the Find Your Own Truth series. One of the first srun novels if I recall. NOT written by Nigel D. Findley. Lone Wolf is about an undercover LS cop who gets hung out to dry and he must find out why.
hyzmarca
Feb 6 2006, 06:42 AM
Sam "Twist" Verner appears in the Secrets of Power trilogy.
PBTHHHHT
Feb 6 2006, 06:47 AM
oops, that's what I meant, the secrets of power. where the heck did I think of find your own truth? Ah well, it's past midnight and I'm at work trying to complete deadlines, that's my excuse... yeah...
I stand corrected.

i think i need caffeine right about now...
edit: Ahhhh, now I know where I got the whole find you truth thing from, it's the name of the third book in the series... duh. And to make it exhaustive, the Secrets of Power series, for those who want to reminded are 'Never Deal with a Dragon', 'Choose Your Enemies Carefully', and 'Find Your Own Truth' by Robert N. Charrette.
Rajaat99
Feb 8 2006, 03:11 PM
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0) |
Anyone read Poison Memories yet? Hasn't hit the shelves where I live yet. |
I've read it. It's ok. About on par with the first one.
I agree with Deadjester, It does seemed rushed and it is difficult to get attached to the characters. I think it would be better with 100, or so, more pages. Just so you get to know the characters.
My favorite SR novel was, crap I forgot the name. It was about some secret data, on how to spy on fiberoptics. This older Shadowrunner lady and some kid who's a ganger and becomes a shaman.
SL James
Feb 8 2006, 07:52 PM
Shadowplay by Nigel Findley (the novel's plot is heavily referenced in Corporate Shadowfiles, which he also wrote).
Cynic project
Feb 8 2006, 10:40 PM
Again I'll post the thing that killed the whole story for me. Trust.
Your team should trust each other enough to take a gun from your teammate and know it is loaded, cause he said so. You should true your team mates with your life,cause if you don't you will get dead. Each and evrytime you go ona run you are putting your lives on the line based on the trust of your teammates. This kind of trust is not earned over night,over a fist fight with a bunch of ganger that could have been easily staged.
You do not trust you Johnson.No mater how many times they hire you.You look them in the eye and nod, but you don't take their word that water is wet without tuching it. any and all info you get from them has to varrified form another source. Yes Johnsons do bad things.Yes they lie. Get over it. Get over the fact they are highering you do bad things.Get over the fact they will use and throw you away when it suits them.If you can't deal witht aht level of pragamtic people, you shouldn't be a runner.
BookWyrm
Feb 9 2006, 01:14 AM
Ah, got it, thanks PHBT & hyzmarce.
BookWyrm
Feb 9 2006, 01:18 AM
QUOTE (Rajaat99) |
QUOTE (fistandantilus3.0 @ Feb 3 2006, 05:21 AM) | Anyone read Poison Memories yet? Hasn't hit the shelves where I live yet. |
I've read it. It's ok. About on par with the first one. I agree with Deadjester, It does seemed rushed and it is difficult to get attached to the characters. I think it would be better with 100, or so, more pages. Just so you get to know the characters. My favorite SR novel was, crap I forgot the name. It was about some secret data, on how to spy on fiberoptics. This older Shadowrunner lady and some kid who's a ganger and becomes a shaman.
|
Fistandantilus, I'm about 1/2 the way through. OK so far.
Sorry Rajaat, I can't recall which novel that was. And I've read all of them.
Kremlin KOA
Feb 9 2006, 06:44 AM
QUOTE (Cynic project) |
Again I'll post the thing that killed the whole story for me. Trust.
Your team should trust each other enough to take a gun from your teammate and know it is loaded, cause he said so. You should true your team mates with your life,cause if you don't you will get dead. Each and evrytime you go ona run you are putting your lives on the line based on the trust of your teammates. This kind of trust is not earned over night,over a fist fight with a bunch of ganger that could have been easily staged.
You do not trust you Johnson.No mater how many times they hire you.You look them in the eye and nod, but you don't take their word that water is wet without tuching it. any and all info you get from them has to varrified form another source. Yes Johnsons do bad things.Yes they lie. Get over it. Get over the fact they are highering you do bad things.Get over the fact they will use and throw you away when it suits them.If you can't deal witht aht level of pragamtic people, you shouldn't be a runner. |
Cynic I do agree with both ofyour points in principe, thee are ocasions when the J can be trusted
1: the J is a good contact
2: the J is a complete amateur (thisone is a maybe)
3: the J is "putting his money where his mouth is"
Out of all the rubs I have Gmed, the one I get the most comments about is one where the johnson wanted someone rescued from the arcology.
He did not hire the runners to get the person, he hired them to BODYGUARD him while he got the person, that's right the J was going into the arcology himself.Tus he could be trusted to not give the runners bogus data
BookWyrm
Feb 15 2006, 06:11 AM
Well, the book's finally finished. Not bad, keeps the story going. Can't wait for the next.
fistandantilus4.0
Feb 15 2006, 07:04 AM
wow, 300 some-odd pages, and that's all it gets. Man, a review with that little to say says very little for the book. I may acutally skip this one. Now i can't wait for May. X-Men comes out, Hardy's book comes out, wife's birthday.. err wait... that just makes me spend more money. May sucks!
Seriously BW, that's all you've got to say for it? I've had more to say about salt on snails.
BookWyrm
Feb 17 2006, 04:41 AM
I didn't want to spoil it for anyone else. The toxic shaman seemed a little....tame for my taste, his description being something akin to a Cenobite. And it's written as an introduction for new players/readers to the SR world. Stephen Kenson pulls this off very well, but I'd rather wait until the trilogy is done to give a full review.
fistandantilus4.0
Feb 17 2006, 07:28 AM
That still seems to sum up my problems with the first one (still haven't found the second novel locally). It just seemed to tame. Like something a GM that was new to the game would do. No real embellishments, nothing out of the ordianry or particularily exciting. Oh well.
BookWyrm
Feb 17 2006, 07:40 PM
Fistandantilus, try ordering it through a local Barnes & Noble or Borders. My local ones have not let me down. Of course, I order my RPG stuff through Previews & my local comic shop, but all my novel needs are met by either one.
fistandantilus4.0
Feb 18 2006, 05:27 AM
my lovely wife just got me the membership thingy through them, plus I 've got a spare gift card sitting around here somewhere. I'll probably look for something else, and then pick that up if I can't find anything. I'll probably get the Special Edition of
Snatch first though. Priorities and all that.

The reviews I've seen so far haven't really pushed it to the top of my list.
Besides, I still need to order
Cara Fahd, and
Crystal Raiders of Barsaive. So much to do...
BookWyrm
Feb 20 2006, 03:55 AM
True, true. It should stay available for order for a while yet.
BookWyrm
Mar 14 2006, 12:51 AM
OK, novel 3 (Fallen Angels) is out, because I picked up mine one Friday the 10th. I'm only a few chapters in, but I'll report after I'm done.
Steven, if you're seeing this, keep the good works coming, brother.
JonathanC
Mar 14 2006, 02:24 AM
I'm not familiar with Kenson's previous Shadowrun material. I did, however, buy Born to Run and Poison Agendas recently, because I'm a big fan of his Mutants and Masterminds work.
From what I know of his writing ability, Born to Run was certainly disappointing. But then, I was expecting a novel. This is, I think, intended as a promotional tool to get kids to play Shadowrun. Which is cool. It's written at about the reading level of your average "Young Adult" novel, features the stereotypical young, gifted, good-natured, naive-yet-somewhat-worldly protagonist that tends to occupy most of these books. I found some of the plot points interesting, but the issues surrounding the amulet, Kellan's mother, etc. were mostly ignored, in favor of introducing Kellan (and the reader) to the general flavor of Shadowrun Seattle, as seen by Steve Kenson. I mostly saw the "people should be trustworthy" theme as being a reflection of the youth and naivete of the protagonist...and it should be noted that by the end of the novel, she is witholding information from Lothan, considers killing him in cold blood, and then lies to her "friends" (including her pseudo-love interest, Orion) about Lothan nearly killing them on behalf of Ares Macrotech. And by the time we hit Poison Agendas, she's doing the exact same thing to her 'team' that Lothan did to her in the first book - keeping information away from them that she feels they don't need to know yet, if ever. It's a growing up story; she starts out as basically an SR-flavored Luke Skywalker, and by the second novel she's packing a machine pistol and holding gangers at gunpoint.
The second novel, speaking of which, is a slight improvement. There's still way too much exposition and description of the Shadowrun setting, but the intrigues hinted at in the Epilogue of the first book are finally starting to take hold, and Kellan's lack of guile has gone from being something glossed over by deus ex machina (having the other runners watching her back so she doesn't get in trouble) to something that actually serves a purpose in the story. She foolishly swallows Midnight's story as soon as the words "I knew your mother" are spoken, and basically starts trusting an elf she just met a day ago more than the mage who's been teaching her and watching her back when he could have easily fried her and taken the amulet for further study. Again, the writing style is a bit juvenile in its simplicity, but Shadowrun has been needing some young blood for a while...I can't blame them for wanting to aim the novels at a younger set.
Overall, not a bad way to kill a lazy sunday, but not really worth the price of a paperback novel. Good for what it is, for sure, and I have a sneaking suspicion that using the iconic characters from the action figure game (G-Dogg, Midnight, Liada, Lothan) wasn't Kenson's idea. Taking the constraints of work-for-hire writing into account, Kenson can be forgiven a few more of the book's faults. I'd have preferred something with the depth and imagination of Kenson's work on the Freedom City sourcebook, but nobody has a perfect record. Every writer has their lesser works. And for what it's worth, even Kenson's C-work is reasonably entertaining.
JonathanC
Mar 15 2006, 05:33 AM
Alright, I finished Poison Agendas...it took a serious turn for the worse towards the end, going from a Shadowrun novel to a book adaptation of a summer blockbuster (chemical weapons in downtown Seattle! And only a ragtag team of misfits to stop the unthinkable!) Seriously disappointing.
BookWyrm
Mar 15 2006, 05:55 AM
I'd have to agree with you, Jonathan, it appears that SK was indeed 'suggested' (in the broadest sense) to use the action-figure characters, but I have not been disappointed in his works yet. Check his site for a listing of his books, or over on the official site for a complete listing.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 15 2006, 06:19 AM
Just saw Poisoned Memories on the shelf today . FIrst time I've seen it out here in Utah. Of course, I'm at work and my wife is at home reading it, so I still have no idea what it's about. I'll post my two cents when I two. Johnathan's review has me a bit worried now, but , hey , I'll check it out with an open mind. kind of like all the Batman movies after the first two. If you go in to it expecting something serious, you're oging to be dissapointed. I'll just look at it for what it is, and take in to account Johnathan's POV that Kenson is/was working with constraints. Just thank god Crimsondude isn't around to write a review.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 16 2006, 09:35 AM
OK, so I just finished reading it through, over all, not a bad book. Definitely an improvement over the first one.
The good stuff: Lots of double dealing, back stabbing, and lieing between shadowrunners. Lots of different agendas.
Had more interesting descriptions of the mechanics of magic, some cool spirit stuff, and a litte t-bird chase that I enjoyed.
The bad: Like was said before, you need some hand waiving to take the end of the book. The shadowrunners are the ones to save the city from a toxic attack, after an Ares Firewatch team drops them off. riiiiight. Then the Mr Johnson goes with the team after the big bad guy, toting an SMG. sure. Then they don't call LoneStar because mr Johnson doesn't want his name connected to it, then they make a publicity thing ot of it afterwards between KE and LS. Now I could take hat if they'd planned it that way, but they didn't.
And the dwarf. Bad dwarf.
The rest: It wasn't a really engaging book. It didn't draw me in and force me to turn the pages. But it was interesting, it did a good job of depicting Seattle and the SR world and some places in it. It works pretty well as continuing to be an introduction to the SR world.
The villian tended to monologue and say some cheesy, cliched lines like "you're supposed to be dead" and "But you're no match for me" right before he dies, that sort of thing. But at least he visual description of him was pretty neat.
All in all, I think I'll go ahead an finish the series when the next book comes to my area. Not really "the explosive new saga continues..." but it's a story at least.
JonathanC
Mar 16 2006, 04:59 PM
It suffers from an excess of exposition, just like the first book. But again...I think the purpose of the book is more to introduce the setting to brand-new players. Assuming you knew nothing about Shadowrun, after reading these books, you would know:
1. Your average SINless has probably never eaten "real" food as we know it. Everything they eat is made from soy or something similar.
2. Stuffer Shack™ is a cheap way to feed yourself.
3. Encounters with gangs are a constant when travelling through Seattle. The highways are patrolled by them, they infest the barrens, and once you piss them off, they will actually come looking for you, even if it means leaving their territory. This is actually a useful detail, as I've been in (and run) SR games where gang run-ins were almost nonexistent.
4. How sorcery works, how conjuring works, and the difference between hermetic and shamanic varieties thereof. Also, some pretty good basic examples of what it looks like to describe for your players.
5. Toxic Shamans hate everybody.
6. Sometimes things will go wrong. LoneStar will come after you, it will seem as if someone sold you out, and really...you may never figure out who it was. Even people who are scheming behind your back may still act on your behalf and look out for you. Likewise, the people who seem nicest to you may well be responsible for the bulk of your problems (Jackie Ozone being a prime example).
7. Metahumans hate it when you compare them to fantasy books. But then, some of them really do fit the stereotype. On the other hand...what the frag was that Dwarf doing on that team? He contributed almost nothing.
8. In Shadowrun, the "good guys" (players) do not always win. Failing a run is part of the game sometimes.
9. Using a fireball in close quarters is a good way to end up frying your melee combatant allies. Mages need to use common sense.
10. As a matter of course, there is no such thing as a "milk run". If it went well, you were being set up. If it looks like it's going well, you're about to get royally fragged. Nasty surprises during runs are the bread and butter of Shadowrun.
Now, if you *are* familiar with Shadowrun, this stuff is old hat and boring, and being beaten over the head with it for two books will annoy you. But if you sit back and enjoy the book, there's a decent enough "growing up Shadowrun" story in there.
BookWyrm
Mar 16 2006, 08:08 PM
QUOTE (JonathanC) |
It suffers from an excess of exposition, just like the first book. But again...I think the purpose of the book is more to introduce the setting to brand-new players. Assuming you knew nothing about Shadowrun, after reading these books, you would know:
1. Your average SINless has probably never eaten "real" food as we know it. Everything they eat is made from soy or something similar.
2. Stuffer Shack™ is a cheap way to feed yourself.
3. Encounters with gangs are a constant when travelling through Seattle. The highways are patrolled by them, they infest the barrens, and once you piss them off, they will actually come looking for you, even if it means leaving their territory. This is actually a useful detail, as I've been in (and run) SR games where gang run-ins were almost nonexistent.
4. How sorcery works, how conjuring works, and the difference between hermetic and shamanic varieties thereof. Also, some pretty good basic examples of what it looks like to describe for your players.
5. Toxic Shamans hate everybody.
6. Sometimes things will go wrong. LoneStar will come after you, it will seem as if someone sold you out, and really...you may never figure out who it was. Even people who are scheming behind your back may still act on your behalf and look out for you. Likewise, the people who seem nicest to you may well be responsible for the bulk of your problems (Jackie Ozone being a prime example).
7. Metahumans hate it when you compare them to fantasy books. But then, some of them really do fit the stereotype. On the other hand...what the frag was that Dwarf doing on that team? He contributed almost nothing.
8. In Shadowrun, the "good guys" (players) do not always win. Failing a run is part of the game sometimes.
9. Using a fireball in close quarters is a good way to end up frying your melee combatant allies. Mages need to use common sense.
10. As a matter of course, there is no such thing as a "milk run". If it went well, you were being set up. If it looks like it's going well, you're about to get royally fragged. Nasty surprises during runs are the bread and butter of Shadowrun.
Now, if you *are* familiar with Shadowrun, this stuff is old hat and boring, and being beaten over the head with it for two books will annoy you. But if you sit back and enjoy the book, there's a decent enough "growing up Shadowrun" story in there. |
1. This is true, even in our time. A lot of people consume pre-processed or manufactured food, and rarely eat 'organic' foods (vegetables, real milk, meat, ect.) unless mandated by a physician, or they were turned on to it at an extremly young age.
2. Yep. Stuffer Shack is the new Circle K. Besides, I think there's already another thread on that.
3. They are not so much constant, as they are prevailent. Sometimes you can sneak through a gang-controlled area without them noticing, or they'll just stop you & ask for a 'returning fee'. Also, if you breeze through in & out, that means the local law has been on one of their 'gang sweeps'.
4. SK wrote several of the Magic books for the entire line of SR, and having him describe the rituals & such actually clears things up. Far too many times, in my experience, the mage will just guesture & all the magick is performed flawessly. No. The details are there to help bring a better understanding. Besides, it help eliminate all those pesky e-mails from fans saying : "In your book (title), on page (xx), what was that ritual? why was it left so ambiguous?"
That, of course, being one of the nicer-phrased ones. You don't want to hear/read the not-so-nice ones.
5. Toxic Shamas DO hate everybody. They blame mankind for all the woes upon the world. But they hate some more than others for other reasons. To try to figure out how a Toxic Shaman's mind works is an exercise in....well, futility.
6. Yes, Lone Star (or whichever law-enforcement company has the contract) will come after you. You're a wanted criminal. You have 'freinds' who amy or may not turn you in for a price (like a lesser sentence, reduced jail time or soe quick cash). As the saying goes, keep your freinds close....
7. YES, metahumans HATE beng compared to their fantasy counterparts, but that doesn't mean they can't take advantage of it then pull a classic switch.
And the dwarf with the axe was there to provide something that you cannot do without--additional back up. Whenthe guy with the gun is being distracted by the HUGE Troll starging down at him, the Dwarf can be *very* sneaky.
8. SR is Murphy's Law in practice. If you blow the mission, but come out alive, you win. If the mission is a success, but your team dies, you lose.
9. Yes.
10. Agreed.
JonathanC
Mar 16 2006, 10:55 PM
Glad you agree. Again, I would definitely hand these books to new players if they expressed an interest in learning more about the setting...I've had many games of various systems go south because the players didn't really comprehend the "flavor" of the game.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 17 2006, 05:43 AM
The dwarf just came across as convenient cannon fodder to me. I didn't really see a point to him being there. I don't see how he would really be useful in an urban run except as a slow moving target. Even wit ha big target just sitting there (the wolverine) chewing on someone he was pretty damn innefective. I liked the rest of the characters , although I'm still a little unsure about how to feel about Midnight. Maybe that's how it was intended.
But I didn't get any strong attachment to the main character[s], although it was interesting to watch Kellan start acting how she hates having Lothan act, and feel smug because of it. I think I liked the shaman the most. I wondered of he was supposed to be an conjuring adept until he cast a manaball there near the end.
Chrome Shadow
Mar 17 2006, 03:58 PM
Well, i have all the previous SR novels, so I Have to have the new ones...
I couldn't find them anywhere, so I finished paying $24.00 for all three on the internet...
I hope they are good...
SL James
Mar 17 2006, 04:30 PM
Can't... breath...
JonathanC
Mar 17 2006, 10:14 PM
QUOTE (Chrome Shadow) |
Well, i have all the previous SR novels, so I Have to have the new ones...
I couldn't find them anywhere, so I finished paying $24.00 for all three on the internet...
I hope they are good... |
There's a third? I thought only the first two were out.
coyote6
Mar 17 2006, 10:42 PM
QUOTE (JonathanC) |
There's a third? I thought only the first two were out. |
The third one ("Fallen Angel", IIRC) came out a week-and-a-half ago, IIRC. I read this week.
JonathanC
Mar 18 2006, 01:06 AM
QUOTE (coyote6) |
QUOTE (JonathanC @ Mar 17 2006, 05:14 PM) | There's a third? I thought only the first two were out. |
The third one ("Fallen Angel", IIRC) came out a week-and-a-half ago, IIRC. I read this week.
|
Weird. Can't find it at my local Barnes & Noble. Huh.
Snow_Fox
Mar 18 2006, 03:44 PM
I seemed to have missed this one. or maybe I was just lucky.
I was htinking of Born to Run by Mercedes Lackey and Larry Dixon. That actually would make a good SR run even htough not an SR novel it is cyberpunk.. Set in current day Savanah it tells of a conflict between a human mage and his allies, elves who enjoy road racing and a group of evil elves who are into kiddy porn and snuff films.
The battle ground being a teen runaway.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 19 2006, 06:03 AM
sounds twisted
Chrome Shadow
Mar 20 2006, 06:31 PM
Yep. "Fallen Angels" is out.
JonathanC
Mar 20 2006, 06:42 PM
Is it worth getting? I'm kind of curious about it since I already read the other two, but on the other hand...I'm not sure I want to punk down another 7 bucks.
arenn
Mar 21 2006, 02:35 PM
Fallen Angels is more of the same. I'd rate it as the strongest of the three, but this isn't a quantum jump in enjoyment.
It's obvious Kenson was hemmed in by the tie-in with Shadowrun Duels and the target age group of the book. I don't think we'll be able to fairly judge the new Shadowrun novel series until actual new material starts coming out.
ATimson
Mar 22 2006, 10:06 PM
QUOTE (JonathanC) |
Again, I would definitely hand these books to new players if they expressed an interest in learning more about the setting... |
As you can see by my registration date off to the left, well, I'm just a little new.

I just finished Kenson's trilogy today. While I'd gleaned bits and pieces about the setting before, this was my first in-depth exposure to the universe. And I have to say, as the trilogy went on it got a little overwhelming.
The first book in the trilogy, I didn't have any problems.
Born to Run was a fairly straightforward introduction into the setting: the basics of shadowrunning, the Awakening, the Matrix... It alone might work as an introduction for new players. (Well, asides from the unresolved plotthreads that stretch over the other two books in the trilogy. Fortunately, Kenson saw fit to have each book have its own main plot that was brought to a conclusion, instead of stretching one book's plot over a trilogy like other authors might have done.)
The second and third books, though, aren't quite so newbie-friendly. This was more of a problem in
Poison Agendas; Kenson never really made clear just what a toxic shaman
was, or why he's have any interest in poisoning Seattle. When that's the main plot of the book, that's not a very good idea.
Fallen Angels suffered from something similar; fortunately, the plot didn't revolve around them. References to Renraku Arcology and Dunkelzahn (and really dragons in general) were made as if the reader should have known who or what they were. Given that this book was significantly longer than the other two, I'm wondering if Kenson finally said "screw it, I'm writing a normal SR book".

So, at the end of the trilogy, what do I think about
Shadowrun? Certainly, the setting is interesting, and has potential. But without a central storyline, or even central set of characters, I'm not quite sure what the point is. I'll definitely buy
Drops of Corruption, because I like Jason Hardy's stuff, but beyond that? I guess we'll just have to see.
hyzmarca
Mar 22 2006, 11:03 PM
Well, there is a central plot and a central set of characters to the Shadowrun setting its just that the cast is very big and the plot simultaneously is enormous and vauge with very strong connections to a fantasy world that is currently owned by a completely different company.
The metaplot really revolves around the Great Dragons, Immortal Elves, and a handful of mortals who could be classified as either prime runners or wealthy businessmen such as Ryan Mercury and Damien Knight.
The problem is that most runners (and dragons for that matter) do not play at this level and probably never will so a novel like this seems far removed to the overarching longterm plot.
This isn't a bad thing at all. Even the people who love the metaplot and the Immortal Elves and the Earthdawn connections need a break from it every now and then. The realy epic Shadowrun novels are filled with superpowered characters who simply do not belong in most Shadowrun campaigns.
At any rate, welcome to Dumpshock. Here is you dikoted AVS ally spirit and yes you can have sex with it.
fistandantilus4.0
Mar 23 2006, 05:16 AM
Some of my favorite books ever were Steven Brust's books with Vlad Taltos, where he never explained anything. It didn't help that I read them completely out of order, but it was neat figuring out what the hell he was talking about. But in hind sight, it would be very annoying if you weren't familiar with the SR world to go "Toxics ..ooooohhh" followed by "what the hell's a toxic?!"
SL James
Mar 23 2006, 05:16 PM
Something toxic?
arenn
Mar 23 2006, 08:26 PM
There are really two different things you can be looking for in a novel: relevance to Shadowrun gaming or quality as a standalone novel.
I've never gamed Shadowrun (though I'd like to try it) though I do own every novel. In that light, I care principally about whether or not the book is any good, not whether it fully follows the rules or otherwise sheds light on game scenarios. It also makes me more interested in novels that advance the mythology of the series versus those that are just plain shadowrunner shadowrunning.
The first run of books did a great job at first of slowly revealing the overarching plot structure of the horrors, the dragons, Immortal Elves, etc. You learned more about the world and it seemed to be leading somewhere. Alas, somewhere around the Dragonheart Saga, which seemed to represent some sort of a conclusion, this basically ended and you ended up with lower quality plots by Lisa Smedman and Stephen Kenson.
This new trilogy, unlike Secrets of Power for example, takes us nowhere really in the Universe. That to me is the greatest disappointment.
Now that there is a new Shadowrun in the 2070's with presumably a more well advanced core story arc, the novels to come will engage with that and be more enjoyable on a purely literary standpoint.
Dale
Mar 24 2006, 02:02 AM
Personally, I'm salivating at the imminent arrival of the new 4th edition novels set in 2070. I'm enjoying Kenson's trilogy, but it seems a little like a "blast from the past" to me rather than something new.
Adam
Mar 24 2006, 04:46 AM
QUOTE (Dale) |
Personally, I'm salivating at the imminent arrival of the new 4th edition novels set in 2070. I'm enjoying Kenson's trilogy, but it seems a little like a "blast from the past" to me rather than something new. |
QUOTE |
Personally, I'm salivating at the imminent arrival of the new 4th edition novels set in 2070. |
These haven't been officially announced yet -- there are still 3 more 206x novels on the way from WizKids in 2006.
ChaLk
Mar 27 2006, 11:14 PM
Just putting in my 2 cents....
I feel that the three books are while perhaps not the strongest work from the author, they are a decent (and much needed) addition to the SR library. A lot of people have noted that they're effectively a good introduction for people who don't know the game and in that I believe they succeed admirably. The feel and some of the mechanics/background of the game are dealt with here in these three novels much better than in some of the shadowrun novels I've read (some of which have been pretty poor). Let me put it this way, I'm fairly regularly wanting to introduce new people to shadowrun, and this is a pretty good way to do it. That said, not perfect by any means.
I also think that looking at these three books more as one book split into three parts is a better way to think of it. In fact I'm pretty certain that many of the issues (character depth, etc) would be solved had these books been compressed into one volume.
In all, i'm pretty happy to see new Shadowrun novels coming and want to see more.
(that said, no more Kellan Colt books, at least for a while okay, there's many amazing possibilities for characters so let's explore those a while shall we).
ATimson
Mar 28 2006, 12:39 AM
QUOTE (ChaLk) |
I also think that looking at these three books more as one book split into three parts is a better way to think of it. In fact I'm pretty certain that many of the issues (character depth, etc) would be solved had these books been compressed into one volume. |
The way the books are structured, I think that they wouldn't have worked together in one volume; there's three distinct stories there, even though some metaplot stretches out across all three.