QUOTE (Wesley Street @ Apr 26 2008, 03:59 AM)
I totally understand what you're saying but that's the inherent danger of writing near future science-fiction and using definitive dates. If the work is popular enough it will stick around and eventually date itself. The example I always cite is the original Star Trek's timeline of World War III/The Eugenics Wars starting in 1996. Independence Day and Ace of Base's popularity aside little in the way of global genocide occurred that year.
Was there a timeline mentioned for when the world archipelago was built in Corporate Enclaves? If not I would make a little mental note to shove its construction timeline forward a few years or decades and just roll with it. But if its construction timeline did conflict with established SR canon, then, yeah, I'd be totally irritated.
Its not that it directly conflicted with it - no date is mentioned in SR canon of its construction. What gets me is that Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, all these cities are essentially in play only as long as nothing terribly destablising happens in the world. Dubai has become the city of the region solely because no one else had the foresight to stablise their country, impose 0% taxation, remove capital restructions and spend oil revenues on infrastructure. However, most of the real spending (other than Jebel Ali Port) only started this century. Already in NY you've had food riots, the Seretech and shiawase decisions etc. The world of 2000-now is so different in SR canon that it doesn't make sense that Dubai or all these other little countries (like Israel) somehow made it through unscathed and were allowed to develop along the exact same lines as they had in real life.
The GCC regions carrying capacity is pretty minimal - very little fresh water, almost no agricultural land, low native manpower (other than saudi), limited natural resources other than hydrocarbons. If the world went to hell in a handbasket like it does from 2000 onwards in canon, I cannot imagine that they would be able to keep up with the required food imports, power and desal projects etc just to keep things ticking. A good chunk of the population would have died from VITAS, mostly the subcontinental labour that they rely on, and with no projects food or water they'd have trouble replacing them. 70 years ago the place was full of nomads scratching a living out of the sand - without the current world order they would have to fall back to that merely to survive and it would be harder still given the damage done to what little productive land they have. There would be massive riots, probably a reversion to tribal governments, coup attempts and corporatisation of oil and gas by Megas with sufficient mercs to hold back whats left of the population. The place would be Beruit all over again - which would have made for one hell of a good runner haunt IMO.
Once the Caliphate forms and things slowly get rebuilt, the focus for development would be where people already are: Baghdad, Amman, Riyadh etc, and where its possible to support a population - on the coastal plains. Dubai and Abu Dhabi wouldn't get much love IMO and consequently those islands probably wouldn't exist.