Nion
Jan 4 2004, 12:50 AM
Is it ever explained why bone lacing costs essence? Is it purely game balance, or does the lacing communicate with the brain in some way?
Ancient History
Jan 4 2004, 12:53 AM
Bones have nerves around them. This is why it hurts when you break one. Getting your entire skeleton laced with kevlar, plastic, ceramic, or a metal is a very intrusive process. It significantly alters your aura from the aural template, and disrupts nervous tissue surrounding the bones.
Ergo, Essence Loss. :spin:
toturi
Jan 4 2004, 12:59 AM
QUOTE (Nion) |
Is it ever explained why bone lacing costs essence? Is it purely game balance, or does the lacing communicate with the brain in some way? |
Do you know how many bones are there in your body? Lacing all of them is going to cause a big chunk of Essense, especially if you are lacing your skull and spinal column.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 01:05 AM
Hydraulic Jacks don't connect to the brain. They connect to the cyberleg, which in turn connects to the -- Oh, wait.
It isn't that it's connecting to your brain (Which I think everything does in some manner), it's that you're replacing your body with something that isn't your body. Make sense?
Tziluthi
Jan 4 2004, 02:09 AM
I think I prefer the neurological answer, personally. The replacement of body parts reason sounds like a cop out, like they had just thought up some arbitrary excuse.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 02:27 AM
And what other reason is there? If you lose your arm and get a clonal replacement, you don't lose Essence from it. However, if you get a Cyberarm, you lose Essence.
If you get a Cerebral Booster, Mnemonic Enhancer, Synaptic Accelerator, or any bioware that affects the nervous system, you don't lose Essence. Funny, huh?
Now, if by your views, I somehow got a Cerebral Booster, not only do I use up Bio Index, but now I use Essence too? That's worse than SR2's ruling on Awakened characters and Bioware (They lose Bio and Essence).
Fresno Bob
Jan 4 2004, 02:32 AM
A cyberarm has to be neurally connected.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 02:34 AM
Yes. So does a Cerebral Booster. And a cloned arm. Your point?
BitBasher
Jan 4 2004, 02:37 AM
No, no it doesn't. bioware uses naturally existing connections and requires no alteration to the brain.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 02:38 AM
Which is why it doesn't take Essence, but Bio Index. That point is proven. Now prove why Bone Lacing shouldn't take Essence. You're putting something that isn't natural into your body.
If it were completely natural, it would cause neither Essence loss or Bio Index usage.
Fortune
Jan 4 2004, 02:56 AM
QUOTE (tanka @ Jan 4 2004, 01:38 PM) |
If it were completely natural, it would cause neither Essence loss or Bio Index usage. |
A 'completely natural' replacement arm, or even liver causes no loss of Bio-Index.
Cray74
Jan 4 2004, 03:06 AM
QUOTE (Nion) |
Is it ever explained why bone lacing costs essence? Is it purely game balance, or does the lacing communicate with the brain in some way? |
What does communication with the brain have to do with essence loss?
Bonelacing significantly alters the body's original function, particularly the toughness of the bones. The body's True Pattern is thus significantly altered.
Even if it's an OOC thing, SR really needs some of Earthdawn's descriptions of patterns included in it, at least to explain essence loss.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 03:27 AM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (tanka @ Jan 4 2004, 01:38 PM) | If it were completely natural, it would cause neither Essence loss or Bio Index usage. |
A 'completely natural' replacement arm, or even liver causes no loss of Bio-Index.
|
That's what I said.
Fortune
Jan 4 2004, 03:37 AM
QUOTE (tanka) |
That's what I said. |
Yeah I know...now! I'm either blind, tired, or too fucking depressed to read properly.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 03:45 AM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (tanka @ Jan 4 2004, 02:27 PM) | That's what I said. |
Yeah I know...now! I'm either blind, tired, or too fucking depressed to read properly. Move along. Nothing to see here. |
S'OK man. I'm sick and should be heading to bed soon. Need that blasted thing they call "sleep," whatever it is.
Kagetenshi
Jan 4 2004, 03:50 AM
Sleep is for the weak.
Alternately, if you're a student (or employed at certain jobs), sleep is for the week.
~J
Nion
Jan 4 2004, 04:46 AM
The first couple of pages of M&M (I think) state that while making the 3rd ed they decided that essence loss came from things communicating with the brain. But still, many things that cost essence do not communicate with the brain.
Joker9125
Jan 4 2004, 05:21 AM
QUOTE |
If it were completely natural, it would cause neither Essence loss or Bio Index usage. |
Time for another stupid noob question by joker
How does essence differ from bio index?
if you want my .02

personally think alot of the essence thing is just a game balancer as are alot of things in the game.
kenji
Jan 4 2004, 05:25 AM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
Sleep is for the weak. Alternately, if you're a student (or employed at certain jobs), sleep is for the week.
~J |
hey, that's my line!
no, really it is. :P
Diesel
Jan 4 2004, 05:25 AM
Essence would be your astral makeup, how much your "soul" can take before it snaps from having a cyber-fragging-toothbrush.
Bio index is how much your body can take before it goes..."Hey, these aren't /my/ parts..."
But yes, it is a game balance issue, with some legitimate explanation.
Joker9125
Jan 4 2004, 05:29 AM
ok im pretty sure that when you lose esssence you also lose magic as well. essence goes from 6 to 5 so your magic goes from 6 to 5. But how does Bio index affect magic?
Kagetenshi
Jan 4 2004, 05:36 AM
Bio index causes "virtual magic loss", which is the same as the real thing except once you hit 0 you don't become a mundane, you can still initiate your way out of the hole. Depending on GM interpretation you may or may not also be able to use all your adept powers as long as the cost of the powers in use at a given time doesn't exceed your virtual magic rating.
Currently it causes this virtual loss at a rate of 1/2 bio index.
~J
Diesel
Jan 4 2004, 06:59 AM
Because there are still foriegn structures in your body inhibiting the mana flow. The mundane doesn't give a shit about this aural impact, but to the awakened, it's the difference between blowing up their head and blowing up your own.
Connor
Jan 4 2004, 08:57 AM
QUOTE |
In game terms, bioware reduces an Awakened character's Magic rating in a way similar to Essence loss. Magic is reduced by the character's Bio Index divided by 2 (round down).
|
I'm pretty sure according to the above errata that it also means it's no longer a virtual loss of magic.
Fortune
Jan 4 2004, 09:12 AM
QUOTE (Connor) |
I'm pretty sure according to the above errata that it also means it's no longer a virtual loss of magic. |
The errata doesn't actually come out and say that. It doesn't even imply it. I would think a change that big would get some kind of mention.
Connor
Jan 4 2004, 09:18 AM
I guess I may have to break out my books and see then. The key word there might be 'similar'. Since that implies it's not the same. Perhaps that's what I get for posting without having bothered to break out Man and Machine lately.
RedmondLarry
Jan 4 2004, 09:22 AM
The errata reads as follows:
p. 78 Bioware and the Awakened [4]
Replace the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs with the following:
The removed paragraphs include the description of "virtual reduction in Magic Rating". Since that description is now gone, there is no longer a virtual loss of Magic.
Zazen
Jan 4 2004, 09:24 AM
Damn, I was just about to post that.
ed- The errata does say so explicitly, too. "Magic reduction from bioware functions like other forms of Magic loss-adepts lose some of their powers, for example."
Fortune
Jan 4 2004, 09:29 AM
QUOTE (OurTeam) |
The errata reads as follows: p. 78 Bioware and the Awakened [4] Replace the third, fourth and fifth paragraphs with the following: The removed paragraphs include the description of "virtual reduction in Magic Rating". Since that description is now gone, there is no longer a virtual loss of Magic. |
And that's what
I get for posting without checking!
It's actually a good thing™ in my opinion to get rid of the 'virtual' crap.
Connor
Jan 4 2004, 09:32 AM
You know, I completely read past that section of errata awhile back. Yay for us both!
Fortune
Jan 4 2004, 09:33 AM
QUOTE (Connor) |
You know, I completely read past that section of errata awhile back. Yay for us both! |
I'm glad you brought it up.
Zazen
Jan 4 2004, 09:46 AM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
It's actually a good thing™ in my opinion to get rid of the 'virtual' crap. |
I couldn't agree with you more
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 03:10 PM
QUOTE (Nion) |
The first couple of pages of M&M (I think) state that while making the 3rd ed they decided that essence loss came from things communicating with the brain. But still, many things that cost essence do not communicate with the brain. |
This is mostly correct. Have a quote.
QUOTE (M&M @ p.7) |
Cyberware needs to be implanted and connected to the neuropathways, unlike pins and pacemakers, which have no need to talk to the brain. So the unique thing about cyberware is that it's a non-natural implant that talks to the brain.
So this machine--metal, ceramic, polymers and other future-tech stuff--must be connected to the 'ol fleshy gray matter. This is how cyberware differs from all other implants, and it is here that Essence is lost. |
Why does Bone Lacing cause Essence loss, you ask? Does it not hurt when you break a bone? Those nerves must be reconnected to the laced bones, thusly causing a loss of Essence.
Thanos007
Jan 4 2004, 04:46 PM
Wait. I'm confused now. Are you saying that with the errata there is
NO magic loss from bio-ware?
Thanos
Tanka
Jan 4 2004, 04:52 PM
There is magic loss, just not virtual magic loss (Which you could still Initiate out of).
Herald of Verjigorm
Jan 4 2004, 05:59 PM
The magic loss from bioware is now just as real as the magic loss from reduced essense. If by bioware and cyberware you reach a magic rating of zero, then you are fully mundane.
Mr. Man
Jan 5 2004, 05:06 AM
QUOTE (toturi) |
Do you know how many bones are there in your body? |
"There are 215 bones in the human body. That's one."
the real question is, how is titanium lacing more invasive/disruptive than, say, kevlar, ceramic, or plastic lacing?
Tanka
Jan 5 2004, 06:11 AM
QUOTE (mfb) |
the real question is, how is titanium lacing more invasive/disruptive than, say, kevlar, ceramic, or plastic lacing? |
Good question. Uh...
It's... Uh... Heavier? Wait, that contradicts my posts in the Lacing+Stealth thread...
Uh... Improvement? I mean, uh... It just... Does! So there!
Fresno Bob
Jan 5 2004, 06:14 AM
QUOTE (Mr. Man) |
"There are 215 bones in the human body. That's one." |
"Eeeehh! Sorry doc, that's wrong! Would you like to go for double jeopardy, where the scores can really get high?"
The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong.
Also, that was an attempt at quoting Die Hard. I haven't seen it in a while.
Fortune
Jan 5 2004, 06:18 AM
QUOTE (Voorhees) |
The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong. |
Actually, according to
this site, the number changes as a human ages.
Tanka
Jan 5 2004, 06:21 AM
QUOTE (Fortune) |
QUOTE (Voorhees @ Jan 5 2004, 05:14 PM) | The human body contains 206 bones. Sarah Conner was wrong. |
Actually, according to this site, the number changes as a human ages. |
*twitch*
Random colors, cheesey graphics, inane use of header tags...
Yup, it's a college-kid-with-no-proper-HTML-skills site!
I should so trademark that...
Fortune
Jan 5 2004, 06:23 AM
Oh well. It was the first site listed in my Google search.
Fresno Bob
Jan 5 2004, 06:23 AM
QUOTE |
fuse together leaving only 206 bones in the adult body |
Proves me point.
Fortune
Jan 5 2004, 06:25 AM
I didn't argue that point. My point is that, at some stage in the human's life, he'll (probably) have 215, as they slowly fuse together. In a way, that makes Mr. Man right, only not in the way he thought he was.
Fresno Bob
Jan 5 2004, 06:26 AM
Sarah Connor was talking about a grown man, Dr. Silberman, who would have had 206 bones.
He quoted Sarah's incorrect statement, and thus was incorrect himself.
Zazen
Jan 5 2004, 07:32 AM
QUOTE (tanka) |
Why does Bone Lacing cause Essence loss, you ask? Does it not hurt when you break a bone? Those nerves must be reconnected to the laced bones, thusly causing a loss of Essence. |
Shouldn't that be true for current replacement bones? Pins too. My friend recently got a couple of titanium vertebrae. My mothers husband has a ceramic sternum and two knees with more metal in them than Voltron. Surely it would hurt if I shattered their knees, sternum, and vertebrae!
I think it would've been much easier and more consistent to say that pacemakers and bone pins do in fact carry a small Essense cost. What's the big deal if the game asserts that my grandfather with the replacement hip actually has 5.85 Essense instead of 6?
toturi
Jan 5 2004, 08:15 AM
QUOTE (Zazen) |
My mothers husband has a ceramic sternum and two knees with more metal in them than Voltron. Surely it would hurt if I shattered their knees, sternum, and vertebrae! |
Your mothers husband?? Why just say your dad?
Fortune
Jan 5 2004, 08:22 AM
Because it isn't his dad, maybe? It could possibly be his mother's husband, a person she married after she and his dad were no longer together. He might not like the term 'step-dad'.
Diesel
Jan 5 2004, 08:22 AM
Perhaps it was a stepfather deal? Don't call on people with that stuff, its just not nice.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.