QUOTE (Ascalaphus @ Sep 3 2011, 12:05 PM)
Aristocrat rule struck me as bizarre... Sure, some of those families will be wealthy, and you could certainly have an "Old Money Class" of people secretly hoarding all the power in Europe. It's probably that way right now, if you look beneath the surface.
But this Old Money class of people doesn't really have anything to do with aristocracy per se. There's a lot of people in there who aren't nobility. Aristocracy as a sociopolitical model lost credibility during the French Revolt.
Just like elsewhere, there are several networks inside the French ruling elite, first and foremost the
grandes écoles they studied in and the Freemason lodges. The old aristocracy is certainly not the most powerful network, but it still exists. They're no longer the richest aroud, but they still get the education and the contacts. There are still some social events where money is not enough to get you an invitation. And so you still have people at the top like Dominique de Villepin (former prime minister), Gilles de Robien (former minister), Josselin de Rohan (majority leader in the senate), Jacques de Chateauvieux (head of Bourbon shipping company), Henri de Castries (head of AXA insurrances), Nicolas de Tavernost (head of M6 TV channel)... If they were all part of a conspiracy, I think they could take over the country.
The
France sourcebook really went far, with duchies reinstated and political power returned to family lines.
Shadows of Europe, and current canon, rather was about how the "conspiracy" discredited those other power networks first, and then had a handful of aristocratic figures looking like heroes, the offsprings of true French blood raised with tradition and honor *play national anthem in the background*, something career politicians and foreign corporate bosses will never understand... yeah, something like that. Now that plot is dead and gone, I ought to post online all that I wrote about it.
What I never decided is what could be the real reason that united the nobility toward this goal in the first place.
QUOTE (Hound @ Sep 3 2011, 01:33 PM)
I would ditch the NAN, or at least consolidate them into one, much smaller country. Just, numerically speaking, even with several justifications (camps saving them from VITAS etc) there's not even enough Native Americans to fill a few large cities, let alone the majority of the United States. However, oddly, since they're in the book I keep them in my games. Honestly, logic and numbers can go to hell, where fun is concerned, and I do like the flavor/concept of the NAN.
I think I would replace the NAN with a broader alliance of native tribes, Mormons and anti-government militias (the Mormons already were NAN allies in current SR canon, but I'd have this being more proeminent), with a lot of local popular support because of federal agencies and armed forces over-reaction, and thus little to none anglos population movement after the Denver Treaty.