I'll try to restrict my focus to 2050-2070 RCC, although all of my comments are based on her history (i.e., nowish). I'm not bringing up anything for 'discussion' though, just paraphrasing first-hand sources. If people want to discuss details of the current Church, go ahead and PM me. Even so, I'll try to keep brief to avoid anything which looks like a ToS violation.
QUOTE (Sengir @ Nov 22 2011, 05:30 PM)
![*](http://forums.dumpshock.com/style_images/greenmotiv/post_snapback.gif)
With the NT things got retconned a bit, there is only one god and magic does not exist. Therefore a miracle is not magic, but a sign that somebody is in good standing with god and therefore god intervenes on his behalf -- or that he is in good standing with the only other source of supernatural shenanigans, the guy downstairs.
What the Vatican did in SR is declare that magic now is a force of nature and not a sign of outside interference. Therefore performing magic is neither a sign of sainthood nor of a pact with the devil, thus no need to burn anyone (unless he does a Spirit Pact).
Exactly this (as well as stevebugge's point, that the English translation is, well, drek). Until they pass an actual decree saying 'sixth world magic is magic, and is not permitted under these circumstances, as indicated in the following documents', it's undecided, and they're free to go either way. Given the strong arguments from hermetics that it's a natural force, and the pragmatic realization that banning ALL magic will kill them, the situation as described in canon seems well-thought out and quite reasonable (i.e., magic is okay, but only when we do it, with a blind eye turned towards the practices of the faithful).
QUOTE (Wakshaani @ Nov 22 2011, 06:10 PM)
![*](http://forums.dumpshock.com/style_images/greenmotiv/post_snapback.gif)
but, teh Shadowrun RCC has had a few hits that ours hasn't ... being kicked out of Ireland and Latin America, for instance, the return of magic, a rise of secular humanisim and, heck, the One World Government (The corporate court) labelled everyone as a SINner.
![smile.gif](http://forums.dumpshock.com/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
I can kinda sorta roll with this. It's like saying the US will never eliminate congress and use two branches of government, but when dragons come out of the ground, they do. It's breaking some MAJOR rules, but if the circumstances are so extreme that they literally redraw what defines the organization then yes, perhaps. So just like the USA is now a new organization, the UCAS, it is possible the RCC is effectively a new organization as well. However, since they still hold Rome, and still claim apostolic succession, everyone will still call them the Roman Catholic Church (whether it's still appropriate or not).
With this in mind, if you're willing to roll this way, consider the backlash will be significant. There's a lot of old-school Catholics who know how they like it, and if the Vatican turns around and says 'oh, women priests and also Mary wasn't a virgin', those people will be packing their bags. From a purely pragmatic stance, I expect that the loss of faithful from accepting a major change in dogma such as female priests would outweigh the benefits. Unless they're already making that break for some other reason, I can't see it as being practical.
The practical solution would be to permit women increased roles in the Church, similar to deacons, but just specify that they aren't ordained priests. I don't know if it's dogma that women can't be deacons; I don't believe it is. Even if it is, a similar program can be set up. The effective difference between a deacon and a priest is a deacon can't bless the communion (so can't lead the mass) and he can't grant absolution through penance. The end result? You'll end up with churches which are organized by women, with women leading all the prayer groups and after-hour activities. And she'll do the readings and sermons for the weekly mass. But she'll be accompanied by an overworked male priest who will sit quietly in his chair for the service, then bless the eucharist in the last fifteen minutes, wrap up, and move to the next service.
Also interesting to note, you'll see a much more international crowd with the loss of Mexico and Ireland (and lower travel costs). Expect them to pull more priests from Africa and Asia. In some areas they may even own their own aircraft. The ability to move personnel and artifacts across the world is pretty potent, and seems like a great resource for someone to tap for other purposes (especially if they can be justified as 'God's work'.)