QUOTE (Wired_SR_AEGIS @ Jun 25 2013, 12:49 AM)

Heheheh. Is that the answer? Why play a cybered character in SR:5? Your GM may use a background count.
...Mmmmmm.

I hope we can do better for that.
-Wired_SR_AEGIS
Not even jumping on the main discussion yet, (no book) but this bears some comment.
GM
may use background count? That's like saying IF a GM decides to count ammo, or the GM
may count essence loss.
Background Count is one of the easier tools to use against balancing awakened. Take a look at the previous editions. 4th ed, in this case; Lagos. General background count of 2 over the entire city. Now your mage with a 6 magic is 1/3 less powerful (-2 magic for all intents and purposes and +2 to drain on top of that. Take the mage with nifty cyberware. Even less capable.
SR has had mechanics in play to help balance mages since 1ed. Magic Loss (only an option in 4th), which is all but guaranteed after initiation. Higher difficulty in seeking medical attention (+2 TN in older editions, -2 DP in 4th). Just to name a couple. Now, I'm not sure if these will be mainline rules or options or even included in 5th, but following Jason Hardy's logic of "everything has a price" I would be very surprised if they, or something more severe, were included.
As for comparing things, IMHO, the only thing the 5th core books should really be compared to is other core books. It's already at 480 pages and $60 (US). They can't condense the entirety of Shadowrun rules into one book. Then it would look like the Hero system tome and have to be about as quality (coloring book paper).
Personally, once the book is generally available for all to see, truly informed opinions can be made. I may agree 100% at that time, but right now it just seems like "Hey! I've got the book, I don't like this, you shouldn't either! I've seen it!" and "hey! you didn't add something for me! boo hoo". Some of the posts I have read on 5th sound exactly like that. Not all, but more than enough.
Most of us are seeing thing completely and totally out of context. Seeing only previews and other peoples opinions on something that can't be seen by all right now leads itself to biased opinions before opinions should be formed. (look at how dangerous this same action gets when discussing many religious/philosophy texts).