Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Unstoppable Elven Technomancer Assassin!
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2, 3
FuelDrop
I do miss machine sprites being able to rig a drone effectively. No gunnery or pilot skills means that they pretty much suck at it.
Epicedion
QUOTE (RHat @ Sep 9 2013, 06:12 PM) *
It would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective technomancer. Just like it would be very, very wrong for that to be the only way to play an effective mage or adept.


It's not. No one's actually demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the technomancer.

QUOTE
And to get the same upgrade, a Technomancer would have to submerge 4 times. Meaning that they have to spend 70 Karma and advance in no other way in that time. The decker, meanwhile, gets to add a bunch of stuff with Karma - because unlike the technomancer the decker can advance with both nuyen and Karma. Technomancers actually have even less use for nuyen now than they did in SR4.


That gets back to the adept vs samurai argument of "the samurai can spend money and karma but the adept can only spend karma." Has that one been solved yet?

QUOTE
That the difference in needed attributes between deckers and technomancers contributes to the fact that technomancers have to spend more to be a technomancer. A street sam isn't really relevant to that point.


They really don't. The decker with the 350,000 nuyen deck is already pretty close to the bleeding edge. Have you considered that the 100,000 nuyen deck is a little more in the ballpark for the common decker?

QUOTE
Actually, a decker has far less need for Attributes A/B. Attributes C is more workable for them than for technomancers due to needing fewer attributes - putting Skills A/B far more in reach.


Attributes B means 2 3 3 1 6 5 5 3 (BARSWLIC) or so, which isn't bad for branching out, and gives you the base persona of the 215,000 nuyen deck.

QUOTE
The point your missing is that the system sort of pretends this activity just doesn't happen for now. And even if then, what you're actually saying is that in exchange for being worse on the run, you can have a bit of a boon to legwork - you can't tell me that doesn't sound like a bad deal to you. Add to that the completely out of line damage codes you're taking to do this sort of thing, and it just gets worse.


No, it doesn't. The technomancer has specific tools for this sort of thing. I think you might be confusing this with archive hacking.

QUOTE
Actually, they ARE directly comparable because they use pretty much the exact same basic system, but spirits just have a whole bunch of extras added on that make them more useful. If sprites aren't meant to be comparable to spirits, they shouldn't use the same system and inflict the same damage to the character. The structure of the system makes it very clear that they're meant to be comparable to spirits.


If spirits were used to pick locks and steal file folders, you might have a point, but just because they share a system doesn't mean that their general utility should be compared.

QUOTE
Ragdolling in the middle of a firefight is a pretty damn foolish thing to do if you don't take SOME kind of precautions.


Deckers can get shot and take stun and physical damage in meatspace and get Biofeedbacked and take stun and physical damage in Matrix space, as well. Nothing new.
Slithery D
QUOTE (Epicedion @ Sep 9 2013, 07:45 PM) *
If spirits were used to pick locks and steal file folders, you might have a point, but just because they share a system doesn't mean that their general utility should be compared.

Task spirits would like to have a word with you.
Jaid
QUOTE (Epicedion @ Sep 9 2013, 06:52 PM) *
Of course Puppeteer can be used to do things like force a Decker to data spike his own persona. Which sucks if he's running in hot-sim with 7 Attack with Hammer and Biofeedback, since his automatic 4 marks on himself would have him doing 17DV to his deck and 17P to his brain (followed by an extra 6P of dumpshock when the deck crashes), which is probably a death sentence.


and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair).

in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule.

Epicedion
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 10 2013, 12:02 AM) *
and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair).

in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule.


Magic's a different ballgame played on a different field. If it's all about being able to indescriminately deal damage, everyone's sub-par to the orbital thor shot station manager. Magic's limitations are typically range and line of sight, while technomancers can freewheel around the planet -- better than deckers, I might add, considering Resonance Channel.

In the same vein, if anyone can actually see the decker, gunfire or a nice grenade will solve the issue pretty simply as well, and decks don't stop bullets too well.
Dolanar
they do if they are wireless enabled
Jaid
QUOTE (Epicedion @ Sep 9 2013, 11:52 PM) *
Magic's a different ballgame played on a different field. If it's all about being able to indescriminately deal damage, everyone's sub-par to the orbital thor shot station manager. Magic's limitations are typically range and line of sight, while technomancers can freewheel around the planet -- better than deckers, I might add, considering Resonance Channel.

In the same vein, if anyone can actually see the decker, gunfire or a nice grenade will solve the issue pretty simply as well, and decks don't stop bullets too well.


right. so technomancy costs as much or more than magic, does a hell of a lot less stuff, and isn't even that great at what it does do, except for a few largely meaningless gimmicks (seriously, we're counting the ability to hack something on the other side of the planet as an important skill now?), and has the same large drawbacks that are supposed to help make magicians not so powerful.

the one thing it does, it isn't even particularly good at, and it pays for that privilege by sucking at everything else. i dunno about you, but that sounds like flawed design to me. it isn't as good at hacking, it's special tricks are generally overpriced and make you bleed from your eyes, and the second you try to compensate for having to spend all your skills, attributes, and everything else on being this overpriced piece of crap by getting augmented (assuming you can even afford to, what with your resources likely being priority E because you need everything else as high as it will go), the special tricks you can do will probably now be doing physical damage (because to puppeteer anything even remotely difficult, you're going to *need* to thread it at rating 4-5, more likely 6, and that doesn't combine well with having less than 6 resonance because 10P damage that can't be healed except by rest is a massive problem, *especially* on a character that likely had to dump body).

yes, they're pretty close to being as good in some areas as deckers. and they pay more for the privilege of being almost as good as the decker pays to be better. this isn't rocket science, here; pay more, get less good stuff, get more drawbacks. that's not how to balance a game.
Epicedion
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 10 2013, 03:22 AM) *
right. so technomancy costs as much or more than magic, does a hell of a lot less stuff, and isn't even that great at what it does do, except for a few largely meaningless gimmicks (seriously, we're counting the ability to hack something on the other side of the planet as an important skill now?), and has the same large drawbacks that are supposed to help make magicians not so powerful.


Again, what does magic have to do with anything? It's starting to sound like you're confusing game balance in an RPG with game balance in a board game. Game balance in an RPG is about providing routes for multiple players to cover necessary roles in proportion to standard challenges, not about making characters uniformly effective.
Dantic
QUOTE (Epicedion @ Sep 10 2013, 03:43 AM) *
Again, what does magic have to do with anything? It's starting to sound like you're confusing game balance in an RPG with game balance in a board game. Game balance in an RPG is about providing routes for multiple players to cover necessary roles in proportion to standard challenges, not about making characters uniformly effective.


Magic has an awful damn lot to do with it, as the mechanics of the two systems are almost identical. So for a cost that equates to 30 Karma more expensive at priority A or 29 Karma more expensive at priority B, you can have bonus points to two skills that provide a less flexible option for pets that you can compile/summon as opposed to the options of skills that a mage can choose for their free skill points. You can have access to less of the amalgam to spells (complex forms) that are useful in a narrower array of situations for a higher personal risk of damage for casting/threading.
As many in this thread have stated, the main shortfall against TMs is in the mechanics. Mechanically in SR5 TMs are comparable to Mages not Deckers.
xsansara
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 9 2013, 10:28 PM) *
those look like reasonable changes except that i would consider resonance in programs to be too much (a technomancer could start with 7 running when the best a decker could hope for is 4... i'd make it resonance divided by 2, round up, giving the same starting limit of 4 programs although the technomancer would need a quality for that), but i'd also consider lowering the fading on some of the complex forms too. puppeteer is level +4, most matrix actions are complex actions, so you're looking at 7 points of fading there (which can only be healed by natural healing), assuming you don't leave *any* room for the target to roll a single hit on defence. maybe take a look at some of the other complex forms, too, although puppeteer is certainly the worst offender. for comparison, 7 points of drain on a mind control spell will generally result in controlling average targets indefinitely (those with higher magic resistance will at least get to roll something, but if you're not throwing at least 7 dice on the test, it will never wear off, and that's for the multiple target version... if you make it single target, like puppeteer, you need more than 8 dice on magic resistance to ever break free of mind control, although for most magicians that will mean physical drain as opposed to stun).


You are right and I had originally written a version of the houserule exactly like you proposed. BUT Resonance is Device Rating and to say TM only get half the programs sounds to me about as arbritrary as saying they don't get any.

TMs still have a lot of inherent disadvantages I did not fix:
they can't shift their Matrix attributes, -> less flexibility / somewhat off-set by more programs
they are stronger affected by Essence loss, -> lower dice pools, less options for branching out
they need more skills OR
they can't run agents,
they are hunted individuals by definition,
the only advantage that comes to mind are the +2 on matrix Perception, I don't count Complex Forms or sprite powers, because most of them suck wink.gif

Fortunately, programs don't exactly stack, so I am not too worried about the abuse of having more. Just less micro management.

A friend gave me his write-up on TM house rules. He has Lightning Bolt and various Illusions as Complex Forms, though both have to be channeled through suitable devices, e.g. a trid-projector. That looks like a whole different game, though a potentially fun one.

Back on topic. I did consider something like a flat discount on drain of -1 or -2, but I haven't exactly playtested this yet and have no idea how that effects the game.

For magic, I was worried about the high drain as well, but through various tricks (Orichalcum, Edge, ...) spells are rarely cast on high Force levels anymore, except those that give high benefit for high Force. Instead I get to see a lot of 2 drain spells. This is somewhat abusive on some spells and contrary to my original impression, I now consider to disallow such tricks on some spells e.g. Improved Reflexes to increase drain.

It is weird that something as broken as the limit system feels the most broken, when it does not work properly.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 9 2013, 10:02 PM) *
and for a lower cost (fewer skills needed to be effective in their role, since technomancers need the hacking, cybercombat, electronic warfare, and computers, plus compile and register, while magicians pretty much only need sorcery, counterspelling, assensing and and summon/bind - although rituals can add a nice bonus as well, it isn't necessary, and even if it was that's still only equal... except that magicians get more free spells than technomancers get complex forms) a sorcerer can mind control as many people as fit in a 6 meter radius for an indefinite period of time to do whatever he wants until he either doesn't care to keep controlling them or until he goes unconscious/falls asleep (not even then if he also uses a focus, but at that point we're not looking at equal costs any more to be fair).

in short, if the magician can see the decker, he can probably mind control the decker *and* all of his nearby friends into shooting each other in the head with real guns (probably starting with the decker, who will actually have dice to roll to break free against a "mere" force 6 spell most likely). i think that just *slightly* trumps controlling the decker's icon for 1 turn to brick itself (and probably kill the decker), as a general rule.


Not quite true, since a victim of most Mental Manipulations gets to roll another resistance roll vs. the Spell every Force Turns. So, 60 Seconds tops... Not indefinite.
Influence/Alter Memories are a special case, but are also far more subtle than most Mental Manipulations tend to be.
Sendaz
nm
Draco18s
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Sep 10 2013, 09:29 AM) *
So, 60 Seconds tops... Not indefinite.


60 is more than long enough to get a group of hostiles to eliminate each other. That's 20 combat rounds. And even if they AREN'T shooting EACH OTHER, they sure as hell are going to be too preoccupied to be shooting at the MAGE and his friends.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Draco18s @ Sep 10 2013, 09:15 AM) *
60 is more than long enough to get a group of hostiles to eliminate each other. That's 20 combat rounds. And even if they AREN'T shooting EACH OTHER, they sure as hell are going to be too preoccupied to be shooting at the MAGE and his friends.


Keep in mind that that is a maximum of time. It may not last 10% that. Especially if the opposition has their own mages. I don't count on it past the initial Turn, personally. That way I am not disappointed. However, the Magician I play generally only uses emotion control and Influence (and not really a lot of that). No Control Thoughts/Actions or any variant, as he honestly does not care for such spells. They directly remove free agency, which his Mentor Spirit is heavily against. So, I may be a bit biased. smile.gif

Also, the opposition that we tend to run up against does not give us the convenience of clustering up in groups for the mages to eliminate. Magic has been around for 50 years, and everyone knows that one of the best ways to defend against it is to not cluster up. Same way people do not cluster so that the grenade does not eliminate everyone.
Jaid
mind control spells reduce your dicepool to break free (but not the initial resist roll) by their force.

so a force 6 mind control spell takes 6 dice away from the target's defense. against an average person, that is going to be zero dice remaining (in fact, until you hit professional rating 4 opponents, only lieutenants have anything left against a force 6 spell looking at the default grunts in the book).

so if you target a group of regular security guards, no there is not a practical limit of ~60 seconds. you own them until you don't feel like owning them any more, or until you fall asleep/go unconscious (or until some other magician frees them, but that assumes said magician isn't shot by them before (s)he can do so).
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 10 2013, 11:39 AM) *
mind control spells reduce your dicepool to break free (but not the initial resist roll) by their force.

so a force 6 mind control spell takes 6 dice away from the target's defense. against an average person, that is going to be zero dice remaining (in fact, until you hit professional rating 4 opponents, only lieutenants have anything left against a force 6 spell looking at the default grunts in the book).

so if you target a group of regular security guards, no there is not a practical limit of ~60 seconds. you own them until you don't feel like owning them any more, or until you fall asleep/go unconscious (or until some other magician frees them, but that assumes said magician isn't shot by them before (s)he can do so).


Are we talking 5th Edition here? Because I wasn't. And even so, Spell Defense will give you resistance Dice. So no, They weill eventually break free (assuming some magical backup). And it WILL be in less than 60 Seconds. *shrug*
Jaid
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Sep 10 2013, 12:43 PM) *
Are we talking 5th Edition here? Because I wasn't. And even so, Spell Defense will give you resistance Dice. So no, They weill eventually break free (assuming some magical backup). And it WILL be in less than 60 Seconds. *shrug*


why wouldn't we be talking 5th edition? the technomancer in question is 5th edition. if it was a 4th edition technomancer, i would be inclined to agree that the extra costs above what a decker pays are completely justified, because 4th edition technomancers are godlike in the matrix.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 10 2013, 12:59 PM) *
why wouldn't we be talking 5th edition? the technomancer in question is 5th edition. if it was a 4th edition technomancer, i would be inclined to agree that the extra costs above what a decker pays are completely justified, because 4th edition technomancers are godlike in the matrix.


My Mind wanders on occasion. I lost track. eek.gif
Sendaz
nm
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Sendaz @ Sep 10 2013, 04:08 PM) *
nm


Really? That was a wide open, easy, shot... I am disappointed, Sendaz... wobble.gif
Slithery D
I just noticed that while SR5 sprites are indeed awful (OS running to give away your location if it hits 40 before you dismiss it, use up a task to register, use up a task to put a registered sprite on standby), there's no limit in the book on how many you can register.

Edit: Actually, there's a limit on page 98 when paying karma for registered sprites (why?!?) at character creation, just not in the main text.
Jaid
QUOTE (Slithery D @ Sep 10 2013, 10:31 PM) *
I just noticed that while SR5 sprites are indeed awful (OS running to give away your location if it hits 40 before you dismiss it, use up a task to register, use up a task to put a registered sprite on standby), there's no limit in the book on how many you can register.

yeah, that's presumed to be an oversight (no pun intended). i would expect that to change.
FuelDrop
By all that is holy! I just went and reread the Technomancer rules. They SUCK!
I like the complex forms. There are some genuinely good tricks there, which would make Technomancers quirky but playable... if it wasn't for the insane fading values.
One in particular stood out to me: Resonance Channel. Is this really the only way for Technomancers to reduce noise? Seriously? I might have missed something, but if not then that's just taking the piss. Pretty much everywhere is considered either a spam zone or a static zone, both of which can be crippling without noise reduction.

I will say one nice thing though: Gremlins sprite power. I like the concept of the Technomancer's little helper making every smartgun that points at them spontaneously malfunction. In fact, it makes me sad that it would take one task per gun for this to happen, with the Technomancer actively directing the Sprite each time. For something with comparable Fading to a Spirit's drain, I'd have thought they'd be at least a little bit more useful (Particularly since unlike Spirits, they incur overwatch. frown.gif).

Damn, just checked the Magic section. The LEAST draining complex forms (L-1) are on par with a flipping FIREBALL (F-1)!
FuelDrop
HOLD EVERYTHING!

Priority C Technomancers get resonance 3 and one complex form, while Mages and Mystic adepts of the same priority get 5 SPELLS?!?

What is even the (Editors note: text continued for 15 pages of raving gibberish connecting this discrepancy to the Dunkelzahn assassination, Aztechnology, Deus, the price of miniature marshmallows in the middle east from 2055 to 2063, and the universal brotherhood. Be glad you didn't have to read it. Don't worry, he's had his meds now.)
FuelDrop
Oh. Technomancers are vulnerable to hot SIM addiction.

That's like Mages being vulnerable to SPELLCASTING ADDICTION!

I... I need a minute.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
Deep Breath, FuelDrop... Deep Breath.
SR5 had some good ideas (and some really bad ones)... and really, REALLY poor implementation.
Just do like me... Stay with SR4A. smile.gif
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
Rather than trying to alter the Double Post, which is impossible, one must instead realize the truth... There is no Double Post. eek.gif
Jack VII
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 05:48 AM) *
That's like Mages being vulnerable to SPELLCASTING ADDICTION!

While there aren't any solid rules for it, one of the list of addictions has spell preparations on it, so Alchemists get screwed for some reason. Why the Hell is everything addictive now? Why not summoning addiction? Compiling addiction? Shooting a gun addiction?

...and then there's Skillwires. My skillwire-focused, not-all-that-powerful-due-to-chargen-limitations ork merc has joined my TM in the corner, both crying their eyes out.
Dantic
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 05:06 AM) *
HOLD EVERYTHING!

Priority C Technomancers get resonance 3 and one complex form, while Mages and Mystic adepts of the same priority get 5 SPELLS?!?

What is even the (Editors note: text continued for 15 pages of raving gibberish connecting this discrepancy to the Dunkelzahn assassination, Aztechnology, Deus, the price of miniature marshmallows in the middle east from 2055 to 2063, and the universal brotherhood. Be glad you didn't have to read it. Don't worry, he's had his meds now.)


The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer.

Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills.

Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game.
Abschalten
QUOTE (Dantic @ Sep 11 2013, 10:34 AM) *
The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer.

Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills.

Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game.


God, the sarcasm here is so thick and rich I could drizzle it on pancakes. love.gif
RHat
QUOTE (Dantic @ Sep 11 2013, 07:34 AM) *
The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer.


I do hope you're being sarcastic here.
Jack VII
I believe that is called sarcasm.
FuelDrop
QUOTE (Dantic @ Sep 11 2013, 10:34 PM) *
The 1 CF (4 Karma value) versus the 5 spells (25 Karma value) is actually a good deal, costing only 21 more Karma for the immensely overpowered Technomancer.

Priority B is only slightly less unbalanced, with 2 CF (8 Karma) versus 7 Spells (35 Karma), making the mighty and game breaking TM cost a measly 27 more Karma at creation, with 2 free rating 4 skills that may be applied to your choice of 3 skills, as opposed to the Mage, who may only advance the same 2 free rating 4 skills from his choice of 12 skills.

Priority A is possibly the best balance, with 5 CF (20 Karma) versus 10 Spells (50 Karma), costing the clearly superior Technomancer a mere 30 Karma more. The Mage still must choose from among 12 skills for his 2 rating 5 skills, leaving 11 skills that must be absolutely necessary for his class, that must be raised by spending skill priority or Karma. The TM clearly gets a pass with his 2 rating 5 skills as he only has a choice of 3 skills to spend them in and obviously doesn't rely heavily on any other skills in the game.

The sarcasm! It's mmm... delicious!

Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)?
FuelDrop
QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Sep 11 2013, 09:42 PM) *
Deep Breath, FuelDrop... Deep Breath.

I have severe BREATHING ADDICTION! Do you have any idea how hard people like you make it to quit a basic biological function?!?
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 03:41 PM) *
I have severe BREATHING ADDICTION! Do you have any idea how hard people like you make it to quit a basic biological function?!?


smile.gif My Apologies... Carry on then. eek.gif
Sendaz
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 06:41 PM) *
I have severe BREATHING ADDICTION! Do you have any idea how hard people like you make it to quit a basic biological function?!?

Have you tried the Breathing Patch?

*Shows a big fluffy pillow*

Just one of these administered by our trained staff after you go to sleep helps break that addiction in no time!
Jack VII
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 04:32 PM) *
Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)?

You can submerge for an echo that emulates Signal Scrub (+2 NR)

I guess invest in a quality directional jammer and jam them before they can jam you? Good luck trying that against "society" in a spam zone.

Now that you've pointed out this additional issue, I think an RCC echo would be even better if it gave you all of the awesome noise reduction capabilities RCCs have.
Jaid
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well.
Sendaz
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 11 2013, 09:14 PM) *
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well.

So you are wanting a techno remix? nyahnyah.gif
RHat
QUOTE (Jaid @ Sep 11 2013, 06:14 PM) *
honestly, i think they should just erase the entire technomancer section and try again. what they decided to do the first time obviously didn't work very well.


That really seems like the only real fix... And somewhere in there, they should probably switch them around to using Resonance or their Fading Attribute for most Matrix actions, simply because otherwise inter-stream balance will be truly and utterly screwed.
Slithery D
Something that occurred to me about sprites running up OS and giving your location away when they hit 40 and go "pop": so what? I mean, should the authorities necessarily do anything about it?

Summoning a sprite in itself isn't an illegal action, so what's GOD going to do after convergence with your location? Does convergence actually give GOD a list of things you did wrong, or does everyone just get the same blanket treatment?
Sendaz
*points to the sign*

NO MATRIX LOITERING

RHat
QUOTE (Slithery D @ Sep 11 2013, 06:52 PM) *
Something that occurred to me about sprites running up OS and giving your location away when they hit 40 and go "pop": so what? I mean, should the authorities necessarily do anything about it?

Summoning a sprite in itself isn't an illegal action, so what's GOD going to do after convergence with your location? Does convergence actually give GOD a list of things you did wrong, or does everyone just get the same blanket treatment?


Regardless of how little sense it makes, the mechanics are pretty clear on that point.
Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE (Sendaz @ Sep 11 2013, 06:22 PM) *
So you are wanting a techno remix? nyahnyah.gif


Yep... I was right... No shame whatsoever. eek.gif
Jaid
on a side note, i do have to say i'm enjoying going through all these technomancer threads where people suddenly pop in and are like "hey wait, you guys weren't making this up... technomancers really got screwed in 5th edition".

but yes, i would like a techno remix nyahnyah.gif
Dantic
QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Sep 11 2013, 05:32 PM) *
The sarcasm! It's mmm... delicious!

Painful though it is to have to pull away from the pure beauty that is that post, I have to ask: What noise reduction options (beyond a single complex form that reduced nose from distance)?

:bows:

You can always suck up the essence loss and use the wireless enabled ability of your direct connection enabling datajack for -1 noise. ohplease.gif
Also, as mentioned by Jack VII
QUOTE
You can submerge for an echo that emulates Signal Scrub (+2 NR)
xsansara
QUOTE (Sendaz @ Sep 12 2013, 01:22 AM) *
So you are wanting a techno remix? nyahnyah.gif


Second that.
FuelDrop
A quick and simple change which would make technomancers slightly less sucky would be swapping their number of complex forms with the Mystic Adept's number of spells.
Slithery D
I've belatedly realized that our Elven technomancer assassin also needs to make a spirit pact to obtain the regeneration power so that he can essentially ignore all Matrix damage (street name - Chumbawamba). The pain editor/platelet factory combo is a crutch.
Jaid
no good.

"Magical damage from
weapon foci, combat spells, most critter or adept powers,
or Drain likewise can’t be healed by Regeneration."

if it won't work on drain, it's pretty much a shoe-in that it won't work for fading.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012