Jason Farlander
Jul 8 2004, 04:20 PM
Alright, well, now for something completely different:
Perhaps Ares intentionally distributes the Predator through the gray markets at a reduced price as a means of advertising the reliability of its products to shadowrunners? Someone who buys an Ares Predator simply because its cheap might then be impressed by its design and performance, and go on to buy other Ares products (ones with higher SI's, like the HVAR, which also might be directly introduced by Ares into the black and gray markets) because, well, he knows they work. And hey, while they might end up equipping people who run against them, in the end isnt it better that they use Ares products while doing so?
As for the laser axe, I'm partial to the description that they have a reputation for sucking and black/gray distributors simply wouldnt be able to unload them if they charged full price. At retail stores, they have that gadget factor where its just kinda cool to have an axe with a laser on it, so they get a hefty pricetag for the rich weapons enthusiast target market. That applies less among shadowrunners.
But hey, if you're selling something that fell off the back of a truck, half price is still profit.
Austere Emancipator
Jul 8 2004, 04:27 PM
QUOTE (Lindt) |
Someone way back on the first page said that the Pred. isnt the Ak-47 of handguns. I completly disagree. Its far and away the AK-47 of heavy pistols. Its the Colt 1911 of today, everyone who has a handgun has one of those. |
It was me, and I haven't changed my view.
The AK-47 is 57 years old, and has been obsolescent since the 70s. Russia got rid of them over 20 years ago, and even China has been phasing them out since around those times. The legal, civilian market of the AK-47 is rather small. The semi-legal, military market is huge. The illegal market for them is fricking massive, with "Grey Kalashnikov" densities nearing 40 per 100 adult males in many countries. (I live in a country where that density is about 30 per 100 adult males.)
There are hundreds of millions of AKs and knock-offs (you can't have a cheap knock-off of a near-free weapon) in the world. Pictures of warehouses full of nothing but AKs keep popping up from Afghanistan and Iraq. They are still made in large numbers in Africa and Asia, and the old ones rarely go out of circulation with pre-60s AKs still soldiering on all around the globe.
The Ares Predator does not even begin to compare, nor does the M1911, and it seems like a very stupid idea that a pistol ever could.
[Edit]Forgot the important bit. The Soviet Union and China were, at the height of their power, pumping out several million of these guns per year, and they were doing it at near-zero cost for themselves. It was in their interest to give out lots of guns to anyone who might be sympathetic with them, and it was also in their interest to sell them dirt cheap all over the world in immense numbers. "Semi-legal" arms trade can be a major source of income to an oppressive regime, after all. Since then several other more or less oppressive regimes have followed suit.
When the Soviet Union started phasing the 7.62x39mm AKs out, they had to dump those dozens of millions of weapons somewhere. Most they probably sold at about $5 each where ever they could, and the rest they just dumped somewhere. Several other countries have since faced a similar situation when phasing out the same guns. Plus, in many a standing army with AKs as their standard guns, their price is measured in packs of cigarettes or bottles of booze -- which aren't exactly expensive in such countries.[/Edit]
gfen
Jul 8 2004, 04:32 PM
Blah. Blah. Blah.
Lindt is the only one who seems to have gotten in in all of this.
Street index reflects the price on the street.
Thus, the predator is ubiqitious. Its common. They get stolen more often than some thing esoteric. They get used in robberies more often than something esoteric. People need to dump them.
You don't know what history is on that street bought pistol, who's used it, where it came from, whatever. Its off the street.
As for the axe? Who knows, plenty of reasons have been suggested. I like the thought that no one wants them because they're junk, not being a walking rules lawyer, is the availability of the axe very high? If so, that perfectly validates the theory that the SI is low becuase its junk.
Arethusa
Jul 8 2004, 04:35 PM
I think you're all missing the good doctor's point, which is, specifically, that if street index represents ubiquity and thus market saturation, why the fuck aren't they also easier to acquire?
Skeptical Clown
Jul 8 2004, 06:02 PM
Rarity isn't the sole determinant of price. Street Index and Availability aren't particularly sophisticated mechanics, but they're functional. Availability reflects the Supply side of the economic equation; Street Index reflects the Demand. Supply and Demand are, themselves, horrifically complicated factors that economists will debate over until the end of time, so I wouldn't expect a simple catchall explanation for how it works in a game.
Cain
Jul 8 2004, 08:03 PM
SC's got it. Let's say a shopkeeper has two different types of guns in stock. The first, he has only one or two-- he has no trouble buying them or keeping them in stock, but he there's simply not a whole hell of a lot out there. The second kind, he's got crates and crates full of them, some collecting dust in the back room.
Both guns are equally availiable-- meaning, that it's equally likely that you can go into a gun store and find what you want. However, because there's so many of type X in stock, the price on them drops.
Let's try an example closer to home. We all shop for gaming books, yes? Let's say that you're going to buy gaming books, with money to spend but no particular idea as to what you want to buy. We'll start off at our supersize Borders and Nobles, to take a look. They actually don't have anything in stock today; it appears they've filled the racks with graphic novels. Maybe if you look around, you can find one or two old things, but nothing you want.
So, instead you have to go looking for a place that carries the books you want. Eventually, you end up at your friendly neighborhood gaming store. You see several super-shiny Shadowrun books lovingly placed on the front racks, and a ton of new D20 stuff sitting in the bargain bins. But they don't have the Shadowrun book that you want, so you go to a different store. Once again, you find several shiny Shadowrun books in the nice racks, and the exact same new D20 stuff in the bargain bins.
The Shadowrun books are an example of moderate availiability and low market saturation. It's not hard at all to get a hold of them. D20 products, OTOH, are an example of moderate availibility and low price-- they have supersaturated the market to the point where they've devalued themselves. They're not any more *availiable*-- you'd find them in as many places as you'd find Shadowrun books-- but the prices have dropped because they've got too much stock.
TinkerGnome
Jul 8 2004, 08:12 PM
I can give an example even better than that. I can walk into my FLGS looking for games and find Shadowrun books in two places. The new stuff is all over in a section with the other books, and it'll cost me retail. That's because these are new books and haven't been collecting dust. There are people out there who want those books and haven't gotten them yet.
Now, in another part of the store are some more SR books. They're all 50% off the retail price because they're old and not in demand. Some of them aren't too terribly easy to find (I believe I saw a copy of R:AS there a while back, but forgot to pick it up), but they're still half price because they're "obsolete" older books.
Misfit Toy
Jul 8 2004, 08:19 PM
It's amazing how your brilliance has changed on the subject, Cain. First, it was
so obvious that Street Index represented quality and brand name, but now it's been your point the entire time that it had nothing to do with those things. Fascinating how that works.

In any case, I do like the idea of Supply vs. Demand, though it still doesn't seem to reflect that accurately. Unless there are just as many Ares Predators on the market as there are Browning Max-Powers, but because everyone has one (despite the relatively high Availability thereof), no one needs or wants to buy one to the point where the Predator costs half as much. Eh?
It also means that a Combat Axe, although readily available, is in such high demand that it has a Street Index of 2. Sames goes for the Toyota Elite and most other things in the game with a SI over 1. And, apparently, so many people with over a million nuyen to blow are trying to get a DocWagon variant of the Citymaster that it warrants a Street Index of 2.5.
Oh, and this demand is only the demand on the Street. If you buy it legally, Demand has no impact on the item.
Odd.
In any case, Availability (and the base cost)
is both Supply and Demand. If the Supply was so much to warrant a low Availability score, then the Demand must obviously not be enough to lower the Supply.
Misfit Toy
Jul 8 2004, 08:20 PM
QUOTE (TinkerGnome @ Jul 8 2004, 02:12 PM) |
I can give an example even better than that. I can walk into my FLGS looking for games and find Shadowrun books in two places. The new stuff is all over in a section with the other books, and it'll cost me retail. That's because these are new books and haven't been collecting dust. There are people out there who want those books and haven't gotten them yet.
Now, in another part of the store are some more SR books. They're all 50% off the retail price because they're old and not in demand. Some of them aren't too terribly easy to find (I believe I saw a copy of R:AS there a while back, but forgot to pick it up), but they're still half price because they're "obsolete" older books. |
Actually, that's a reflection of Availability. Unless, of course, you're buying those books from an illegal source instead of a legal one where you can always find them without a problem.
CircuitBoyBlue
Jul 8 2004, 08:23 PM
Whoa, R:AS is an old book that's not easy to find anymore? Man, I'm too young to feel this old...
Thanos007
Jul 8 2004, 08:23 PM
[QUOTE]Oh, and this demand is only the demand on the Street. If you buy it legally, Demand has no impact on the item.
The price is already adjusted for demand.
Thanos
Lindt
Jul 8 2004, 08:28 PM
Austere Emancipator: My point is its the standered in its class. You think Assult Rifle, you think Ak-47. IN Sr, you think Heavy Pistol, you think Ares Pred. Ill admit, it wont have the market saturation that an AK has now, but then again, Ares hasent be dumping them out by the millions for 60 years. When it comes down to the line, a low avil is how easy it is to find, a low SI is how easy it is to BUY. With a SI of .25 someone is just getting rid of them, but only to the people that know how to find them. Think RPG-7s. Millions and Millions, and if you could get one, getting 100 isnt that hard.
And yes, Thanos, is you buy it leagly, its the listed price, no change.
Skeptical Clown
Jul 8 2004, 08:42 PM
Personally, I never claimed it was a very GOOD mechanic... I said it was functional. If Street Index is lower than 1, it just means that the demand on the street is lower than the supply available on the black/grey market. The rationale behind it may be preposterous, but the mechanic itself is fine.
Jason Farlander
Jul 8 2004, 11:26 PM
The bottom line is that the availability and street index values dont actually represent anything cold/hard/specific. Like nearly everything else in the game, they attempt to vaguely define in a simplistic manner a situation that is actually quite complex. When any value you encounter seems nonsensical, you can attempt to come up with an explanation that works for you, change the value, or decide not to care.
I generally prefer to try to come up with explanations for strange values rather than changing the value, but in some cases (such as the magical gear availabilities) I simply can not. Whatever. There exist untold multitudes of potential explanations for why something might have a Street Index of X or an availability of Y. Either come up with one that suits you or dont... but, please, dont insult people for their attempts at the same thing.
Cain
Jul 9 2004, 03:58 AM
QUOTE |
First, it was so obvious that Street Index represented quality and brand name, but now it's been your point the entire time that it had nothing to do with those things. |
You really need to work on that reading comprehension, Funk. I've been making that point all along-- you're the one who's been arguing differently.
QUOTE |
In any case, I do like the idea of Supply vs. Demand, though it still doesn't seem to reflect that accurately. Unless there are just as many Ares Predators on the market as there are Browning Max-Powers, but because everyone has one (despite the relatively high Availability thereof), no one needs or wants to buy one to the point where the Predator costs half as much. Eh? |
I agree with you a bit more, here. Still, there's a difference between "everyone has one" and "everyone has a crate of the damn things".
Try this-- do you read comic books? There's probably a bunch of comic stores near you. If I want to go in there and buy a random X-men comic, I'll have dozens of titles to choose from, with plenty of copies in stock. The availiability is therefore low.
Now, let's say that instead, I want to go in and buy a trade paperback of a certain popular saga. Well, all comic stores will have it in, but they probably only have one or two copies. The availiability is equal for the comic books-- I don't have to search any harder to find one-- and the differences are mild, but the prices are going to be wildly different.
Availiability does not exactly represent supply, I'll have to edit my comments on that. Availiability represents how easy it is to get a hold of said item. A large supply helps, but isn't required. Street Index indicates how common said item is on the street, which includes all the rigamarole required to get it there.
(And yes, I do allow people to buy "hot" items at a steep discount. Of course, "hot" means that someone is actively looking for said item, and the trail is still warm. Generally, only desperate Shadowrunners will take those sort of deals. Buying things at SI presumes that all trails have gone stone cold, and there's virtually no chance of the rightful owner coming looking for it. Using this theory, I once did a setup for an entire campaign... but that's a tale for another day.)
Austere Emancipator
Jul 9 2004, 04:02 AM
So in a very restricted sense, it's sort of like an AK-47 of heavy pistols. After all, it's not because the AK is thought of as a standard AR that its SI is so low -- indeed, I doubt it's thought of that way in many Western cultures, I'd even bet against it in the US. The reason the SI is low is that they've been dumped out by the millions for 57 years.
As for RPG-7s, I doubt you could easily get a hundred in the US. In the areas where they are used by militaries/militias, maybe. But in those parts, acquiring an RPG-7 generally requires nothing more than a stroll to the bazaar.
Regardless, I do think the AK-47 is/used to be a good example of a weapon with a very low SI while still having an Availability significantly higher than 2/12hrs, at least around here. But Predators aren't like AK-47s in the more important ways. I realize that SR writers might like to think they are, but it still is a ridiculous idea.
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 04:06 AM
QUOTE (Cain) |
You really need to work on that reading comprehension, Funk. I've been making that point all along-- you're the one who's been arguing differently. |
Right. Here's a few blasts from the pasts...
QUOTE (CAIN) |
Actually, Doc, that's a perfect rationale for it. The availiability rating applies to brand-new items. The street index applies to "Like new, only fired once, owned by a little old lady in Pasedena" items. Since the legal price has gone down, the street cost has gone down as well. |
QUOTE (CAIN) |
I can see one right off the bat: cheap knock-offs. Remember, by canon, the Ares Predator isn't a specific gun-- it represents a whole lot of different handgun designs with minimal differences. If we also include a bundle of cheap forgeries, that work just as well, then the entire set of handguns will be devalued. The only problem is that by canon, we assume that all guns work identically to their brand-new condition, which isn't the case-- but in any event, that's a different lack, and not a problem with the Street Index rules. |
QUOTE (CAIN) |
I'd suggest the cheap knock-off factor. Ares being the premier gun maker, if someone's going to make a knock-off, they're going to copy the top-of-the-line product and not a midrange one. I also believe that somewhere in the books, it mentions an Ares executive who accidentally flooded the market in an attempt to gain dominance. Another thing to consider is concealability. Smaller guns with equal power would be more popular. |
QUOTE (CAIN) |
Not all items have knock-offs. Heck, some items can't be duplicated cheaply. If you go wandering around a flea market, you can find all kinds of stuff-- some of which was even acquired legally. Stuff that's easily duplicated, such as DVD's, can be found for dirt cheap. Stuff that's more difficult to make-- such as big illegal fireworks-- tends to be much more expensive. |
QUOTE (CAIN) |
QUOTE (Zazen) | So do you raise street index when someone wants an Ares Predator that is actually an "Ares Predator"? |
They'd just be forced to buy it new. |
Yep. Your whole argument the entire time has been the exact opposite of everything you said throughout the discussion. <thumbs up>
Zazen
Jul 9 2004, 04:10 AM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
I think you're all missing the good doctor's point, which is, specifically, that if street index represents ubiquity and thus market saturation, why the fuck aren't they also easier to acquire? |
This has been addressed several times!
It IS easy to acquire. There is no easier heavy pistol! Yes, the TN is not 2, but 3. What does that mean? That the market may indeed be saturated, but that 3 is the minimum TN required to access the market at all.
Despite this, you may still disagree that SI has anything to do with supply. If so, then I ask that you abandon the attempt to show why this notion is wrong, but instead show me what is correct! Do what DF has refused or forgotten to do: tell me what you say SI represents.
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 04:13 AM
I haven't refused or forgotten. I'm of the mind that it's not a very good mechanic at all because it's somewhat redundant with two other stats already listed (Price and Availability). The middleman and getting-around-legal-constraints make a lot of sense to me, too, but only for a Street Index higher than 1. I've simply been waiting for someone to come up with a good, solid explanation for low Street Indexes, which I still haven't seen yet.
Herald of Verjigorm
Jul 9 2004, 04:21 AM
The market forces for the black market tend to be quantitatively different than those on the legal market, even though the concepts are the same. SI is a simplified attempt at reflecting the differences in one simple multiplication problem. More specific details are reflected to some extent in the negotiation phase or by spending more cred to lower availability.
SI is not itself any specific market force, but a measure of the differences between the two markets.
How's that as an explanation?
Arethusa
Jul 9 2004, 04:26 AM
QUOTE (Zazen) |
QUOTE (Arethusa @ Jul 8 2004, 11:35 AM) | I think you're all missing the good doctor's point, which is, specifically, that if street index represents ubiquity and thus market saturation, why the fuck aren't they also easier to acquire? |
This has been addressed several times!
It IS easy to acquire. There is no easier heavy pistol! Yes, the TN is not 2, but 3. What does that mean? That the market may indeed be saturated, but that 3 is the minimum TN required to access the market at all.
Despite this, you may still disagree that SI has anything to do with supply. If so, then I ask that you abandon the attempt to show why this notion is wrong, but instead show me what is correct! Do what DF has refused or forgotten to do: tell me what you say SI represents.
|
I don't disagree; I just think that, until now, it hasn't been explicitly addressed. I might've missed something, though; I'll admit I've only been skimming this thread.
QUOTE (Funk) |
I've simply been waiting for someone to come up with a good, solid explanation for low Street Indexes, which I still haven't seen yet. |
You got one on the first page, third post in the thread. Your assumption that weapons purchased illegally must be perfectly new and purchased recently legally before being laundered is the core flaw in your reasoning. Were this the case, yes, no street index above 1 (or even at 1) would make any sense, but it is simply not.
Necro Tech
Jul 9 2004, 04:27 AM
I should know better than to jump in on this one but.......
I think of street index as product desireability and perceived value. Not everything that performs the same function is equally desireable. While the Colt and the Predator have roughly the same stats and perform the same function they might be very different guns. I have never owned a pistol but I know for a fact the although many rifles fire the same calibur (I believe even the same round) they are put together is very different ways. This applies to all products.
Look at cars. Two cars in the same class like a Honda Accord and Toyota Camry depreciate at different rates. The same cars bought new off the lot three years later will cost less obviously but the percentage off MSRP will be different. Why? perceived value. Stolen cars however are a different story. Honda are much more expensive on the black market. Why? I don't have a clue.
As availability vs. commonality the two don't need to be related. After all, the availabilty is yours, not your fixers. While he can get either gun just as easily the perceived value of the predator is lower. Maybe its not sexy. Maybe people on the street don't want to pay full value for a gun to support those scum sucking goons at Ares. Maybe a gun thats a little bit lighter and a little more concealable is really worth twice as much. Who knows? But also remember that the street has regular customers. Joe shadowrunner might be able to get the fake sin but 99% of the sinless can't and those are the ones the market revolves around.
Or maybe, the game designers wanted to throw in a little market realism to keep gear acquisition from being a bunch a fixed number dice rolling.
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 05:29 AM
QUOTE (Arethusa) |
You got one on the first page, third post in the thread. Your assumption that weapons purchased illegally must be perfectly new and purchased recently legally before being laundered is the core flaw in your reasoning. Were this the case, yes, no street index above 1 (or even at 1) would make any sense, but it is simply not. |
Actually I've been saying the exact opposite: The quality is exactly the same between the two. Whether you want to say they're used, cheap knock-offs or brand-new never-been-used it doesn't matter -- you can buy junk legally and you can buy top-of-the-line illegally and vice-versa. Street Index has no bearing on that.
QUOTE (Necro Tech) |
Or maybe, the game designers wanted to throw in a little market realism to keep gear acquisition from being a bunch a fixed number dice rolling. |
They did a better job in older editions when they listed flat price changes for entire categories of equipment. But when you have two items that are pretty much identical as far as Availability, Price, and function go, yet have a Street Index that's grossly different, it doesn't make much sense (as shown in that no one has yet given a good, solid reasoning for that difference that isn't already covered by another mechanic or simply GM fiat).
Like I said earlier in the thread, if all Heavy Pistols had a price reduction of 50% on the streets, that would make a bit more sense. Individual weapons would still have their individual Availabilities based on supply and demand would value their price within whichever market you're buying on. But again, the wild differences between otherwise identical items doesn't make any sense.
Necro Tech
Jul 9 2004, 05:52 AM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy) |
Like I said earlier in the thread, if all Heavy Pistols had a price reduction of 50% on the streets, that would make a bit more sense. Individual weapons would still have their individual Availabilities based on supply and demand would value their price within whichever market you're buying on. But again, the wild differences between otherwise identical items doesn't make any sense. |
Thats what I was trying to say. The guns are statistically the same but are not the same gun. Two different manufactures. Anymore would just be repeating my post. Since no one on this board can test the two weapons we just have to take the developers word for it that for the Sinless, the Browning(earlier reference to Colt was brain malfunction) is worth more to them for the reasons stated in my post.
Cain
Jul 9 2004, 07:34 AM
QUOTE |
I haven't refused or forgotten. I'm of the mind that it's not a very good mechanic at all because it's somewhat redundant with two other stats already listed (Price and Availability). The middleman and getting-around-legal-constraints make a lot of sense to me, too, but only for a Street Index higher than 1. I've simply been waiting for someone to come up with a good, solid explanation for low Street Indexes, which I still haven't seen yet. |
Then you definitely need to read the thread. Clearly, you haven't been able to follow my arguments. I won't make the automatic assumption that it's because you're stupider than a lombotomized toad; instead, I'll just use simple words.
At any event, have you ever been to a flea market? You can buy all kinds of new/slightly used stuff for lower than retail. Functionally, it's the same; but pricewise, it's different. A flea market is a perfect example of the "grey market", btw-- it's technically legal, but a lot of not-so-legal activity goes on.
Now, there are plenty of things at a flea market that just about everyone has. However, if people only have a few of Item X, the price will generally be higher than Item Y, which they have crates and crates of.
For this example, we'll use music CD's. Everyone who sells music CD's is going to have No Doubt, and the latest Britney Spears cacaphony. They're equally availiable, meaning that you can go to the exact same stores and expect to find both copies. However, the "cheap knock offs" have duplicated tones of Britney CD's; or a bunch fell off a truck, or what-have-you. So, each and every music stand will have 15+ Britney CD's, while they only have 2 or 3 No Doubt CD's.
Based on that, which will be most likely to be in the bargain bin?
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 07:47 AM
QUOTE (Cain) |
Now, there are plenty of things at a flea market that just about everyone has. However, if people only have a few of Item X, the price will generally be higher than Item Y, which they have crates and crates of. |
Once again: Availability and Price. Everything you're buying there is a legal purchase unless someone is specifically performing illegal sales in public view with little to no worries about an off-duty cop being in the crowd. So Street Index doesn't apply.
QUOTE |
For this example, we'll use music CD's. Everyone who sells music CD's is going to have No Doubt, and the latest Britney Spears cacaphony. They're equally availiable, meaning that you can go to the exact same stores and expect to find both copies. However, the "cheap knock offs" have duplicated tones of Britney CD's; or a bunch fell off a truck, or what-have-you. So, each and every music stand will have 15+ Britney CD's, while they only have 2 or 3 No Doubt CD's. |
So now you're saying that the only Audio MiniCDs you can buy on the streets are crappy music... that buying a quality band is impossible on the streets because, since Audio MiniCDs have a Street Index of 0.75, all music you buy on the streets is a "cheap knock-off" to reflect the price difference. Riiiiiiiiight.
That's the only thing I can gather from what you keep vomiting from your fingertips, because otherwise you're talking about Availability again.
QUOTE |
Based on that, which will be most likely to be in the bargain bin? |
Which Bargain Big are you talking about? The one at the store where you make the rest of your LEGAL purchases, or the black market one where you make your ILLEGAL purchases? You know, considering that's the canonical difference between paying the STREET INDEX and not paying the STREET INDEX.
Oh, and please don't let me stop the flip-flopping of your argument so you can try and steal other people's more insightful takes on what Street Index represents as if they were your arguments the entire time (only to prove otherwise yet again in your last post).
CircuitBoyBlue
Jul 9 2004, 07:53 AM
Not being an econonmist, I suppose I'll probably be labelled as being stupider than a lobotomized toad on this, but...
Is it at all possible that SIs below 1 reflect an item that is taxed or has some other artificial bump up on the price? That's pretty much how it works with cigarettes, if I'm not mistaken. You get them cheaper through black market channels, because you're skipping state taxes. I can see the same being true with the Ares Predator. Since the most common legal means of getting one is through Weapons World, who gets them at basically manufacture price since they're owned by Ares, most of the markup is pure and simple profit. They're paying less for the Predator than the Browning. With the axe, I can see it's SI being lower than 1 because it got some horrible legal settlement against it because somebody bought it and caused millions of nuyen worth of damage to themselves doing something they were able to blame on the bum laser. If this got enacted as sort of a special tax on the Centurion, I can see the SI reflecting models that have been absconded with by shadowfolk before that tax could be enacted at a legal point of sale. Heck, I think I'd even support a tax on ALL combat axes, but that's just me. And I would use the revenue from it to pay for social services for children who've lost limbs.
Birdy
Jul 9 2004, 07:54 AM
Flea market is a good example. Even more so, if you have a border nearby. Some things that where new but cheaper than buying them officially. From what I learned by talking to a police officer some years back, they found the following stuff on the flea market during raids:
cigarets (only difference to original: No taxmark, Skimmed from the plant)
Bicycles (later turned out to be from a truckload full that had been stolen)
Car radios (still packaged and shrink-wrapped, skimmed from the plant)
All cheaper than legally bought since no one would buy them otherwise (You don't get a guarantee on flea market items

definitely sold by dealers, not the original thiefs, so there is "overhead")
Another example:
There is no difference between a VW Golf (Rabbit in the US IIRC) build for the german market and one build for say the Netherlands. Both come from the same plant in Wolfsburg. Even with taxes and the overhead for re-import it was cheaper! for a german to acquire a so called EU re-import (a car from the Netherlands etc) than to buy one for the german market. If you bought directly, you even get better guarantee terms
And another one:
Modern Scoda, Seat and VW compact cars (Up to the Passat) are technically identical, using the same blueprints etc. This puts them into the "Pred and copies" class.
The cars sell for different prices (VW->Seat->Scoda)
Used car prices (even the theoretical "Schwacke" price for prime vehicles) vary astronomically, out of proportion to the original prices.
Why? Some stupid old-timer still believe that german cars are something special. Same with the Pred. Some people think it's special so it can be sold for a higher price.
Birdy
CircuitBoyBlue
Jul 9 2004, 07:57 AM
By the way, I didn't mean to sound sarcastic when I was asking if that was possible. I'm really not an economist (for those of you who didn't figure that out), and have absolutely no idea if what I suggested is possible or not. I just meant to ask if anyone else thought it made sense, or if I was a flaming idiot (I am, but is it creeping into Shadowrun now, too?)
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 08:10 AM
QUOTE (Birdy) |
All cheaper than legally bought since no one would buy them otherwise (You don't get a guarantee on flea market items wink.gif definitely sold by dealers, not the original thiefs, so there is "overhead") |
The problem there is that it should be a universal trend in the black market/flea markets if it were true; everything you buy there that's legal (with or without a permit) is something "no one would buy [...] otherwise." An Ares Predator has the same Availability and Legal Code as a Browning Max-Power, so any Browning Max-Powers you buy on the black market, be they skimmed from the factory and still in their shrink-wrapped packaging, should have the same mark-down since "no one would buy them otherwise."
QUOTE |
There is no difference between a VW Golf (Rabbit in the US IIRC) build for the german market and one build for say the Netherlands. Both come from the same plant in Wolfsburg. Even with taxes and the overhead for re-import it was cheaper! for a german to acquire a so called EU re-import (a car from the Netherlands etc) than to buy one for the german market. If you bought directly, you even get better guarantee terms wink.gif |
That's reflected in the regional cost differences that sometimes show up in Shadowrun sourcebooks. There's little stopping a character (post-creation) beyond border crossings from going to one region where items are drastically cheaper and then coming back home. This applies towards legal purchases as well as street purchases, so again... it can't be an accurate reflection of what Street Index represents.
QUOTE |
Modern Scoda, Seat and VW compact cars (Up to the Passat) are technically identical, using the same blueprints etc. This puts them into the "Pred and copies" class.
The cars sell for different prices (VW->Seat->Scoda) |
That doesn't change the fact that you can still buy a VW illegally for the exact same price as a Scoda assuming they were just variant models of each other. Brand names have no bearings on Street Index. A Ford Americar and a Mercury Comet have the exact same stats -- of which Street Index is -- even though they're technically different vehicles.
Pinel
Jul 9 2004, 09:56 AM
Only on bulletin boards can you find conversations that last so long even when everyone is saying almost the same thing

I'm not an economist either but I'll throw this in anyway:
Most of the disagreements here stem from people trying to apply the exact same market dynamics to both the Open and the Shadow economy, which
doesn't work. Illegal commerce is by nature influenced by a lot of other, non-traditional market forces like the urgency of disposing of hot items, the cost of "sanitizing" stolen gear, etc.. This could be one of the reasons for SIs below 1, but nothing in the rules confirms that. So don't assume that two similar guns which are equally priced and available on the open market will remain so equal on the shadow market, but don't look to the rules for a clear explanation either.
QUOTE |
The problem there is that it should be a universal trend in the black market/flea markets if it were true; everything you buy there that's legal (with or without a permit) is something "no one would buy [...] otherwise." An Ares Predator has the same Availability and Legal Code as a Browning Max-Power, so any Browning Max-Powers you buy on the black market, be they skimmed from the factory and still in their shrink-wrapped packaging, should have the same mark-down since "no one would buy them otherwise." |
Misfit Toy, you're right unless you accept the possibility that similar game stats for two items doesn't imply similar economic situations. Maybe the Browning would also have a SI of 0.5 except that its manufacturers include a lot of ID and anti-theft features compared to the Predator. This would make black market Brownings more expensive because of the work involved in "sanitizing" them. I agree that universal market trends make sense and are easier to accept, but the Predator SI doesn't fit that logic so we can either change the stat or rationalize it.
IMO it's easy to make up a believable answer (based on real-life economic principles) to why the Predator and the Browning can have the same game stats and Availability, but different SIs. Some of the reasons which appeal to me the most (compiled from all the other posts in this topic):
- The Predator is so popular and easy to replicate that there are dozens of illegal variants produced at lower cost, although none of these variants are available on the legal market. Availability doesn't change because the legal and illegal supplies are roughly the same size, although made up of differently-costed items from different sources.
- Alternatively to the reason above, the numerous illegal copies might have created a high percentage of lemons in black market Predators (only), and the street price is lower because black market demand is lower. Runners don't want to risk getting a flawed item (the chance is much lower if they buy a black market Browning) and fences must lower the price of their Predators to move them. Legit buyers in stores don't have that problem (and so pay top price) since they'll never risk picking an illegally-produced lemon off the shelf.
- Ares is purposely flooding the grey / black market with cheaper, older-version Predator 1 models to clear their stocks. They don't lower the price on the open market to protect sales volumes for the newer versions. At the same time, they want to improve the odds that criminals using their weapons will have the older, less powerful ones when facing Ares and other law enforcement troops.
Birdy
Jul 9 2004, 12:47 PM
QUOTE |
QUOTE (Birdy) | All cheaper than legally bought since no one would buy them otherwise (You don't get a guarantee on flea market items wink.gif definitely sold by dealers, not the original thiefs, so there is "overhead") |
The problem there is that it should be a universal trend in the black market/flea markets if it were true; everything you buy there that's legal (with or without a permit) is something "no one would buy [...] otherwise." An Ares Predator has the same Availability and Legal Code as a Browning Max-Power, so any Browning Max-Powers you buy on the black market, be they skimmed from the factory and still in their shrink-wrapped packaging, should have the same mark-down since "no one would buy them otherwise."
|
Even on a flea market there are differences between brand names. Even so they might cost the same if bought legally.
That depends on wether you see the three stats as "one package" or not.
If you see the stats as one package (and you seem to) than your option is right.
If you see (Price, Avail.) as one package dealing with "Legal purchase" and SI as a factor of "how available is this thing in the grey/black market" it changes the end result.
In that case there are simply fewer BMP than APE in the legal market (smaller production run/less imported/fewer clones imported) and the SI [partially] reflects the fact that fewer can be "skimmed" at the factory. The economic model of SR is not (and IMHO doesn't need to be - it's a g<beeep> game!) to correctly take such things as customer base and customer preferences into account (i.e. I can easily order a .45 Government in germany but it would most likely be difficult to get one on the black market since it's not a typical european weapon. If I go for a Walter P1/P32 or a Browning HP that should be far easier. Avail is equal [Order and wait] but SI will be different since one is a european mass market stuff, the other is a foreign import)
Birdy
Skeptical Clown
Jul 9 2004, 03:21 PM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy) |
I haven't refused or forgotten. I'm of the mind that it's not a very good mechanic at all because it's somewhat redundant with two other stats already listed (Price and Availability). The middleman and getting-around-legal-constraints make a lot of sense to me, too, but only for a Street Index higher than 1. I've simply been waiting for someone to come up with a good, solid explanation for low Street Indexes, which I still haven't seen yet. |
With the original example of the axe, I think it's pretty easy to explain. The axe is unpopular; it was sent to a bunch of distributers, but got bad feedback and people rarely bought it. It still sits on the shelves of stores, probably available indefinitely because hardly anyone buys them. No sale or clearance price because... there aren't any rules for those.

When one pops up on the street, most street dealers probably don't have the room or the inclination to keep one of the things sitting around. They're looking to move it for more valuable and popular equipment.
Cain
Jul 9 2004, 07:10 PM
QUOTE |
Once again: Availability and Price. Everything you're buying there is a legal purchase unless someone is specifically performing illegal sales in public view with little to no worries about an off-duty cop being in the crowd. So Street Index doesn't apply. |
Translation: You've never been to a flea market.
QUOTE |
So now you're saying that the only Audio MiniCDs you can buy on the streets are crappy music... |
On the streets? Possibly. In stores in general? Dude, haven'y you noticed that you can pay more for one CD than another? Or is it in Funkelstienland everyone pays the exact same price for everything in a generic category?
QUOTE |
That's the only thing I can gather from what you keep vomiting from your fingertips, because otherwise you're talking about Availability again. |
Wrong! But thanks for playing! As a consolation prize, we're giving you another free chance to pass sixth-grade reading comprehension!

QUOTE |
Which Bargain Big are you talking about? The one at the store where you make the rest of your LEGAL purchases, or the black market one where you make your ILLEGAL purchases? You know, considering that's the canonical difference between paying the STREET INDEX and not paying the STREET INDEX.
|
The "grey market" one that you seem to conveniently keep forgetting about, every time it disproves one of your arguments. I guarantee you, at any given flea market, you'll be lucky to find a legit music CD that's not in some kid's walkman. Same's true for the DVD's. Technically, they're not illegal to buy, only to manufacture, which is why it's a "grey" market.
QUOTE |
The problem there is that it should be a universal trend in the black market/flea markets if it were true |
Not necessarily. Look, every time a ninja or samurai movie makes it as a summer blockbuster, the flea markets get filled with knockoff katanas. It also has to do with locale-- it's cheaper to buy drugs in Canada than the US, so while there's a thriving grey market for the drugs here, there's not a corresponding one in Canada. Since the regional differences you cite are an advanced rule-- not fully implemented in 3e-- SI is the basic reflection of that.
Anyway, Availiability still only reflects how many people are selling said item, not how many they have for sale. We had another thread on that a while ago-- what happens if someone wants to buy a belt of AV ammo? The availiability rules presume that you're only buying one item.
Misfit Toy
Jul 9 2004, 07:17 PM
QUOTE |
The "grey market" one that you seem to conveniently keep forgetting about, every time it disproves one of your arguments. I guarantee you, at any given flea market, you'll be lucky to find a legit music CD that's not in some kid's walkman. Same's true for the DVD's. Technically, they're not illegal to buy, only to manufacture, which is why it's a "grey" market. |
Are you really this dense? Your arguments apply at all markets, not just black or grey ones. Street Index does not reflect any of the things you keep babbling on about. You're talking about Availability.
QUOTE |
Anyway, Availiability still only reflects how many people are selling said item, not how many they have for sale. |
Again, that's not specific to the grey or black markets. I have no idea why you can't get that through your skull.
Feel free to keep calling me stupid even though you're clearly the one who can't comprehend a simple fact.
jebo
Jul 10 2004, 09:58 AM
Hey, I don't normally post on message boards, but I saw the opportunity to needlessly lengthen this thread by posting something that restated various points already mentioned. That and I'm tired and feeling like a jerk.
X is a fixer who deals in stolen guns and is representative of the overall black market.
Y is a shadowrunner who wishes to purchase a gun illegally for unstated reasons.
To purchase the gun Y calls his contact, X, and asks about two specific guns: the Ares Predator and the Browning Max-Power. X has each of these guns in stock and would be willing to sell them to Y, if Y sweet-talks him enough, sounds like a safe business partner, etc. (etiquette)
At this point, note that due to the availability rating of each gun being 3, Y must devote an equal amount of sweet-talk to X to be able to negotiate a price for either gun. The availability rating represents only the amount of work Y has to do to convince X to sell to him(or alternatively to go looking for the item), not the overall supply of the gun in the black market.
Currently X has 5 Browning Max-Powers and 25 Ares Predators in stock, all brand new off the back of a truck. X desires, for whatever reason, to sell them all in a month. He expects that he could sell exactly 5 of each gun every month at retail cost.
Since X can sell all of his BMP’s at retail, the street index is 1.0.
The monthly demand (5) is less than X’s supply (25) of the AP, but X estimates that he could sell all 25 AP’s in the next month if he priced them at half of retail cost. X is willing to sell at this price because he acquired the guns for 10% of retail cost. This places the street index at 0.5
End result:
Retail price / Black market price / SI
AP: 450 / 250 / 0.5
BMP: 450 / 450 / 1.0
The availability of the gun represents only how hard it is to find someone to sell to you. The street index represents supply and demand numbers in the black market. These numbers are not comparable to going to a retail store, because the retail market has a whole different set of costs, supply and demand.
So an axe can have a high availability TN; either few black market suppliers have them, or they are wary of selling to just anyone. If those same suppliers have an oversupply of that item they are likely to sell it at less than retail cost, assuming that they still make a profit.
Alternatively, a car could have a low availability TN and a high street index in a case where suppliers are readily available, but buyers who need to keep their names off of a registration (say if they plan to crash the car through a bank wall) are more plentiful than the supply of stolen cars.
Now insult me, that's always fun.
Cain
Jul 10 2004, 09:18 PM
Thank you, jebo. Couldn't have put it better myself.
QUOTE |
Your arguments apply at all markets, not just black or grey ones. Street Index does not reflect any of the things you keep babbling on about. You're talking about Availability. |
Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
First of all, the argument does apply a bit at all markets; but there's this thing called "Manufactured Suggested Retail Price" that means new items will tend to be sold within a fixed price range. New, legit items were paid for at the full price, so the question becomes, how much of a profit can they make off of said item? Stock that sits around collecting dust, even if you paid pennies for the lot, is effectively worthless.
Street index does, therefore, reflect all of the things I mention. Availiability only deals with how hard it is to get a hold of a single item (read p 273) and not how many the dealers have in stock.
If you want another example of availibility vs street index... have you ever watched a TV? Seen an ad for a furniture store or a car lot? Ever notice how often they have "We're overstocked!" sales? Basically, for some "unknown" reason, they have more stock this weekend than usual. The availiability remains the same-- you can still go to the competition, and find the exact same item-- but now the prices are dropping as supply increases.
kevyn668
Jul 11 2004, 08:09 AM
The "Overstocked Sale" is usually a lie.
Misfit Toy
Jul 11 2004, 02:44 PM
And you KNOW how often you see those at the black market.
Street Index = Black Market.
Black Market != Thrift Stores.
Black Market != Sales.
Black Market != Stores Advertising on Television.
Thus...
Street Index != Thrift Stores.
Street Index != Sales.
Street Index != Stores Advertising on Television.
Street Index has nothing to do with any of the crap you keep spouting. It is ONLY the price difference when buying things illegally. I-L-L-E-G-A-L-L-Y. As in not buying it at a retail store. As in not buying it from a store advertising on television. As in not buying it through any legal channels whatsoever.
Considering you can't even get WHAT the Street Index applies to straight, it's no wonder you can't come up with a decent explanation for what it's supposed to represent.
You've gone from used items to cheap knock-offs to frelling color differences, and now you're claiming that it applies to legal purchases, too. Hell, you're saying that it *is* Availability even though Availability covers Availability (a novel concept, huh).
What's next? Concealability isn't really how well you can conceal an item, it's how much damage it is despite the Damage Code? That's the exact same idiocy you're constantly churning out in this thread.
Zazen
Jul 11 2004, 07:27 PM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy) |
I haven't refused or forgotten. |
Ok

QUOTE |
I'm of the mind that it's not a very good mechanic at all because it's somewhat redundant with two other stats already listed (Price and Availability). The middleman and getting-around-legal-constraints make a lot of sense to me, too, but only for a Street Index higher than 1. |
So you're saying that you have no solid idea what canon Street Index is supposed to mean, but that you know for sure what it doesn't mean. I can certainly respect the position of not knowing but refuting, having adopted it a few times myself.
Have you considered, however, that discounting supply as a factor describes a system where the supply of an item will never affect its price? Even if the black market is absurdly bloated and availability (in your opinion, the sole representation of supply) drops to -30, they'll still cost full price. Don't you find that odd?
Misfit Toy
Jul 11 2004, 07:30 PM
Nope, of the ideas offered forth so far, supply is one that almost works. The only problem is that it would only apply to the black market since that's the only thing Street Index applies to. It's also never dynamic, it's as constant as Price and Availability are.
Also, if it truly represented supply, why doesn't it have any impact whatsoever on Availability or how many items are available? The only change is that it alters how much you pay, and only on the black market.
Zazen
Jul 11 2004, 08:03 PM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy @ Jul 11 2004, 02:30 PM) |
Nope, of the ideas offered forth so far, supply is one that almost works. The only problem is that it would only apply to the black market since that's the only thing Street Index applies to. |
You must've confused my post a little. Black-market supply/demand is what I'm saying is a factor in SI. Of course it only applies to the black market.
QUOTE |
It's also never dynamic, it's as constant as Price and Availability are. |
As you surely know, the GM can change numbers as he sees fit. The current system has the great advantage of allowing him to create a wide variety of effects by manipulating only two or three stats. The decision to sever the connection between SI and supply/demand makes adjusting for changes in black-market supply or demand a difficult and complicated one for the GM. He'd have to create a whole new (redundantly applied!) stat to represent it.
You can see how SI is a more valuable tool for the GM if it is said to have a connection to supply and demand.
QUOTE |
Also, if it truly represented supply, why doesn't it have any impact whatsoever on Availability or how many items are available? |
You are saying, I think, that if supply is a factor in SI, it cannot be a factor in Availability. This is quite untrue! It should certainly be a factor in both, and I have seen nothing to indicate that it is not.
Cain
Jul 11 2004, 08:04 PM
QUOTE |
Street Index has nothing to do with any of the crap you keep spouting. It is ONLY the price difference when buying things illegally. I-L-L-E-G-A-L-L-Y. As in not buying it at a retail store. As in not buying it from a store advertising on television. |
BZZT! Wrong answer!
QUOTE |
As in not buying it through any legal channels whatsoever. |
And wrong yet again!
Look, let's go back to the big controversial one. Senior citizens in the USA are going across the border, to Canada, to buy their perscription drugs. This is what's known as the g-r-e-y market, which is legal at every step but illegal overall. In other words: It's perfectly legal to go to Canada, it's perfectly legal to buy perscription drugs there, and it's perfectly legal to posess said drugs. However, it's illegal to do the whole thing. What's more, some drugstores are even doing this-- they buy from a Canadian distributor, which in turn allows them to sell for a lower price. In short, there are *several* thriving legal markets in illicit goods, many of whom can (and do!) advertise.
The grey market involves buying things through less-than-legal channels. Legal items that were acquired through less than legal means is the best example of this. To a degree, illegal items purchased through similar means are also allowed-- knock-off CD's, for one, are legal to own and legal to buy; they're just illegal to manufacture and illegal to knowingly sell.
Therefore:
Street Index != Black Market
Street Index = Black, Grey, and other quasi-legal markets
Grey market = Flea markets
Grey Market = Sales
Grey market = Legal advertising
You can't seem to get the difference between a thrift store and a flea market, can you? No wonder why you can't tell the difference between availiability and street index.
QUOTE |
Also, if it truly represented supply, why doesn't it have any impact whatsoever on Availability or how many items are available? The only change is that it alters how much you pay, and only on the black market. |
Because 1: Availiability only determines how readily you can find *one* copy of said item, not cases of them; and 2: It is not the "black" market, it's the Shadow market... and, if you'd read your book, you'd see that.
Let's even quote the book. The relevant sentence is on p 273, which apparently you haven't read. I guess you must be stymied by the Astral Space section.
QUOTE ("SR3 BBB") |
The Street Index affects the price of the item if purchased through the shadow or grey markets. |
Don't worry, I know that some day, you will be able to read your BBB all the way through. But don't stress yourself out; focus on your Dick-and-Jane primers first.
Zazen
Jul 11 2004, 08:11 PM
QUOTE (Cain @ Jul 11 2004, 03:04 PM) |
The relevant sentence is on p [b]273[/i], which apparently you haven't read. I guess you must be stymied by the Astral Space section. |
I looked for page [b]273[/i] but was unable to find it. Did you mean page
273, or page 273?
Now that this obnoxious quip is out of the way, might we stop harping on a single typo that occured
a week ago?
Kagetenshi
Jul 11 2004, 08:15 PM
Do you ask a fire to stop burning, or a plague to stop spreading, or the rain to stop falling? Do you ask the earth to stop spinning, or the waters to stop flowing? Why, then, do you ask the Dumpshockers to stop incessantly recalling tiny errors?
~J
Zazen
Jul 11 2004, 08:25 PM
That you're right makes me want to cry.
jebo
Jul 11 2004, 08:34 PM
QUOTE |
Nope, of the ideas offered forth so far, supply is one that almost works. The only problem is that it would only apply to the black market since that's the only thing Street Index applies to. It's also never dynamic, it's as constant as Price and Availability are. |
I'm going to avoid the black/grey market issue.
The SI would in fact be dynamic, as would price and availability. They would all change with time. The weapon list represents where all three factors are at a specific point in the timeline to me.
QUOTE |
Also, if it truly represented supply, why doesn't it have any impact whatsoever on Availability or how many items are available? The only change is that it alters how much you pay |
SI can still be an indication of supply. Supply does impact availability, but it is not the only factor to do so. Inherent transaction risk would have a large impact on availability in my mind. If I'm selling you a hold-out pistol I'm less worried about it than if I'm selling you an assault cannon. Because the price is higher, the item is more illegal, etc. the risk goes way up. You might want to rob/kill me at the transaction, it has a higher probability of being a police sting, or I just want to make sure you have good credit. Ok, probably not that last one, but you get the idea.
Since the transaction is more risky to me, you need to have better etiquette to convince me to even tell you I have one. I'm not going to sell assault cannons to just anyone even if I have 1,000,000 of them; it's too risky. If I did have that many I might lower my standards a bit, say from availability 16 to 14.
Of course, the SI is 2 for an assault cannon, so for a more topical example compare the uzi III to the AVS: same price, more illegal, higher availability, lower street index.
As to "how many items are available," that is not a listed stat anywhere I know about. That is something to be inferred from the nature of the item, the flavor text, and the street index.
Misfit Toy
Jul 11 2004, 09:02 PM
You guys do realize, of course, that you're arguing that Ordinary Clothing is in shorter supply than Armored Jackets, right? And in Cain's case at least, this applies to both legal and illegal markets. Oh hell, that there's fewer articles of Ordinary Clothing on the market than REAL LEATHER Clothing.
BitBasher
Jul 11 2004, 09:11 PM
QUOTE (Misfit Toy) |
You guys do realize, of course, that you're arguing that Ordinary Clothing is in shorter supply than Armored Jackets, right? And in Cain's case at least, this applies to both legal and illegal markets. Oh hell, that there's fewer articles of Ordinary Clothing on the market than REAL LEATHER Clothing. |
No, they're arguing that multiple factors are at work that are abstracted and there can be multiple reasons for SI and availability. There's a difference. They are arguing that that COULD explain the availability or SI of regular clothing, but I believe in this case they do not. Abstract, Abstract, Abstract. And you are not given all the market conditions to specifically determine what causes what.
Misfit Toy
Jul 11 2004, 09:18 PM
Nope, they're arguing it's definitely that. At least when it suits their argument. At other times it's definitely that its a cheap knock-off (of which real leather is still cheaper than ordinary clothing). At other times its definitely that its used clothing (of which real leather is apparently donated to Good Will far more often than ordinary clothing is). At other times its definitely because they have a different color. At other times its definitely because {insert idiotic Cain remark here}. etc.
On all markets, of course.
Apparently, the one thing it definitely isn't in most cases, is the added cost for dealing with middlemen. Page [b]273[/i] -- despite making it clear that that is the primary reason for it -- should be completely dismissed because that does nothing to explain low Street Index values.
But of course I'm sure Cain'll waltz in and say "of course, good job BitBasher, I've been saying that all along!!!!!!" So thumbs up to that.