tisoz
Jul 4 2005, 02:29 PM
QUOTE (Caine Hazen) |
the bound vs unbound spirits...Everyone will be able to summmon both types of spirits, the unbound are like the old shaman type, the bound like the hermetic. So both spirits are still there, just every tradition has access to them. If I remember correctly there are 6 base spirits and every tradition chooses 5 they can summon (or are determined by tradition). More will be added in the Magic book. |
The bound or unbound part doesn‘t bother me too much, but the same basic spirits does. So what is the point of playing a shaman? So everyone knows who to geek when your mask becomes visible?
QUOTE (Caine Hazen) |
skills will now be grouped aso that you can buy a group vs a single skill |
This actually sounds like a good idea, assuming there is a group discount, or is it just the in demand skills that everyone needs to help speed up chargen?
blakkie
Jul 4 2005, 03:43 PM
QUOTE (tisoz @ Jul 4 2005, 08:29 AM) |
QUOTE (Caine Hazen) | skills will now be grouped aso that you can buy a group vs a single skill |
This actually sounds like a good idea, assuming there is a group discount, or is it just the in demand skills that everyone needs to help speed up chargen? |
Either would be good. With a tripling or more of the build points, and the likely change to some sort of progressive costs for at least Attributes, i'm guessing things that speed up chargen are going to be very appreciated.
Like cyberware/bioware essense costs totaling together instead of the current mesh of affairs. For chargen alone i welcome that change.
hobgoblin
Jul 4 2005, 05:21 PM
about those spirits, maybe he was thinking 5-6 groups of spirits rather then 5-6 spirits. ie, elementals, spirits of the sky, spirits of the land, spirits of man, spirits of water...
same as is today realy. allso, there is the term base in there. this could mean that here could be 6 basic stats but lists diffrent abliltys that the spirit type can take on given some conditions.
ie, if your in the middle of the city and you summon the base spirit type of man it may take on hearth or city depening on where you are in said city.
Kesh
Jul 4 2005, 07:13 PM
QUOTE (tisoz) |
QUOTE (Caine Hazen) | the bound vs unbound spirits...Everyone will be able to summmon both types of spirits, the unbound are like the old shaman type, the bound like the hermetic. So both spirits are still there, just every tradition has access to them. If I remember correctly there are 6 base spirits and every tradition chooses 5 they can summon (or are determined by tradition). More will be added in the Magic book. |
The bound or unbound part doesn‘t bother me too much, but the same basic spirits does. So what is the point of playing a shaman? So everyone knows who to geek when your mask becomes visible?
|
I've always figured the masks to be more flavor than anything else. I never enforced them in play.
Alternately, maybe other spirit types cause a similar effect (summoning a Fire Elemental wreathes you in translucent flames briefly, etc.).
Ellery
Jul 4 2005, 10:03 PM
Taking that comment at face value (6 to choose from, pick 5), it sounds like SR4 will have drastically less distinction between different magical traditions, once you consider the temporary vs. permanent summoning thing. There might be some differences in flavor text, but basically, a magician is a magician; tradition is irrelevant but presumably player selection of spells still matters.
I'm not sure whether this is a gameplay improvement or not. Players typically like not being limited--but then if there aren't clearly distinct paths with advantages and disadvantages, most everyone makes the same choice and the result is boring. (It kind of makes me wonder what the elven path magic will end up as--if it exists at all, will the paths now be different in name only?)
I think the change makes the dynamics of magical ability a lot less interesting. In SR3, and previously, the different abilities of hermetics and shamen made the disagreements between them plausible; they were different, and they therefore had something to disagree about, and there was something interesting and curious to be explained--why were they different? Now, it's sounding like that's all gone; hermeticism vs. shamanism is replaced by a Baskin-Robbins' worth of magical flavors, all a matter of taste with at best minor variations in the number of calories and whether there are nuts or chocolate. From a storyline perspective, this seems counterproductive.
Overwatch
Jul 4 2005, 10:08 PM
It's also possible that they will change the rules for magic detection. Perhaps all spells now have some kind of visual element based on force, wether it be a glowey ball of energy, or a translucent red wolf's head. Man, I'd really like a look at the magic section of SR4...
Hurry up Gen Con!!
Bull
Jul 4 2005, 10:12 PM
Spells have always had a detection factor based on force, regardless of the spell type or category. I believe the TN to detect the spell was 10-Force of the Spell, but don;t quote me on that. It's something close to that though.
Bull
Overwatch
Jul 4 2005, 10:23 PM
Yeah, thats how the system works now, but visually shamans have the shamanic masks to deal with, and as far as i know hermetics don't have any visual give aways. My thought was that maybe they'll level that particular playing field. in fact they'd have to, if they use the same creation mechanic to build both traditions in SR4.
Unless magical manifestation is some kind of optional component that can be tacked on or removed from whatever tradition you are building.
hobgoblin
Jul 4 2005, 10:47 PM
a shamanic mask gives -2 on the perception check.
and doing something with a totem advantage nets you a -1 on the same check.
still, if they keep the totem advantages around then it may still be fun to play a shaman. most people probably allready select them on the basis of cool rather then stats anyways. a min-maxing power gamer will 100% of the time go physical mage as it gets the best of both magical worlds and dont have to deal with stuff like totems.
or, people select coyote as totem as they then are not restricted by any rules outside of the spirits.
maybe shamans get some sort of bonus when "ordering" unbound spirits around?
hmm, the term unbound spirit makes my neckhair stand. the barrier between unbound and free may be a thin one at best...
blakkie
Jul 4 2005, 10:55 PM
QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Jul 4 2005, 04:47 PM) |
hmm, the term unbound spirit makes my neckhair stand. the barrier between unbound and free may be a thin one at best... |
I didn't get that at all from his description. It sounds like unbound just means temporarily summoned, like the base conjuring shamans do now. The "bound"ness being more whether they are bound to our plane or not, not whether they are bound to the summoner. If they are not bound [tight enough] they return from whence they came at sunrise/sunset.
I think the curious part is whether shamans will have to shell out similar money/resources for binding spirits as hermetics currently do for the elementals. That was the trade-off i aways saw between hermetic and totem. Cash costs vs. masks & totem loyalty. Once you got a few metamagics and some karma under you belt the shaman had access to comparable on-tap spirits.
pragma
Jul 4 2005, 11:14 PM
I'd like to echo the concerns about distinctions between shamanism and hermeticism going the way of the dinosaur -- it will be a loss if shamans and mages become identical. While I doubt that these extremes will actually come to pass, it is enough to worry me.
What are the general feelings regarding the changes in spell force?
tisoz
Jul 4 2005, 11:15 PM
The perception test to notice spellcasting was 4 + Magic Attribute - Force, subject to further modifiers like the -2 for shamen and -1 for spell with totem bonus.
I think Ellery meant more like summoning is going to be about the same as spellcasting was between the traditions. No more access to only one types of spirits. And the powers those spirits granted were a major influence on what tradition was chosen. Some had very unique powers. Now it sounds like you can choose all but one type.
QUOTE (blakkie) |
I think the curious part is whether shamans will have to shell out similar money/resources for binding spirits as hermetics currently do for the elementals. That was the trade-off i aways saw between hermetic and totem. Cash costs vs. masks & totem loyalty. Once you got a few metamagics and some karma under you belt the shaman had access to comparable on-tap spirits. |
Paying for conjuring materials is over-rated anyway. All the hermetics I know make their own. You say a few metamagics and some karma like it is insignificant. The hermetic had no huge use for Invoking and other metamagics were a bigger priority. So the shaman was having to get the metamagic and spend a bit of karma just to level the field. And the spirits still left at dusk/dawn.
QUOTE (pragma) |
What are the general feelings regarding the change is spell force. |
It depends on what they are going to cost to learn. Are they now going to cost 1, 5, 10 or how much karma? Or are you going to get so many spells with each initiation? How will they price spell formula? How do you learn them, that was force dependant?
Bull
Jul 4 2005, 11:19 PM
Unbound spirits are what Shaman's summon under 3rd ed. They leave at Dusk/Dawn.
Bound spirits are what hermentics summon now. Ritual summons them and binds them for an indefinate (or at least lengthy) amount of time until all their services are used.
Bull
blakkie
Jul 4 2005, 11:43 PM
QUOTE (tisoz) |
How do you learn them, that was force dependant? |
May that entire set of learning rules rot in whatever hell they are relegated to. A festering example of the garbage that clogged SR3.
Another reason for thinking highly of no Force associated with learning a spell. Whatever learning proccess there is you'll only have to go through it once for each spell.
blakkie
Jul 4 2005, 11:48 PM
QUOTE (Ellery @ Jul 4 2005, 04:03 PM) |
Taking that comment at face value (6 to choose from, pick 5), it sounds like SR4 will have drastically less distinction between different magical traditions, once you consider the temporary vs. permanent summoning thing. There might be some differences in flavor text, but basically, a magician is a magician; tradition is irrelevant but presumably player selection of spells still matters. |
I don't like the sound of 5 of 6 either. But then what the 6 represent i'm not sure. Street Magic adds to the 6, i wonder if the Traditions still pick 5 from that expanded pool?
P.S. Hermetics being able to summon spirits could be a natural outcome of the UMT from SOTA:2063.
FlakJacket
Jul 4 2005, 11:58 PM
Don't suppose you noticed if there were any major changes to adepts whilst you were riffling through the papers?
Interested since they're my favourite characters to play. I'm looking forward to the Magician's Way rules and everyone's, probable, bitching about them.
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 12:39 PM
QUOTE (FlakJacket) |
Don't suppose you noticed if there were any major changes to adepts whilst you were riffling through the papers? Interested since they're my favourite characters to play. I'm looking forward to the Magician's Way rules and everyone's, probable, bitching about them. |
I had a dream that the Magician's Way became obsolete. That there was nolonger a need for that kludge because there was a mechanism designed and built into the system that allowed awakened characters to use abilities in both.
But then again i was sleeping with my head on a running magnetic tape blanker at the time.
Overwatch
Jul 5 2005, 04:12 PM
I have a feeling that wireless technology, even for smartguns and the like will be ubiquitous in SR4. Simply for the flow of game mechanics and the integration of deckers.
If a group of guards come around the corner, the mage can affect them with his manabolt, the adept can affect them with his gung-fu, and the sammie can definitely affect them with his HK 227. With wireless additions to smartgun links, helmet optics, etc., now the decker can also affect them via hacking.
Now I'm not sure what effect this will have on the feel of Shadowrun, but it serves to more fully lure the script kiddies out of mom's basement.
Those bulk tape erasers make too much noise to sleep.. try wearing a nice degaussing coil around your head instead.
Kagetenshi
Jul 5 2005, 04:18 PM
QUOTE (blakkie @ Jul 5 2005, 07:39 AM) |
That there was nolonger a need for that kludge |
There was never the need for that kludge. The problem with pre-SR4 magic is that people lost sight of what the magic system was designed as and tried to either combine elements that didn't go together (Magician's Way Adept, Unified Magical Theory) or add elements that didn't belong (additional traditions). This problem has been taken to the furthest extreme possible in SR4.
~J
tisoz
Jul 5 2005, 04:22 PM
QUOTE (Hell Hound) |
Where do toxic and insect spirits fit into these new spirit types? Shamans turn toxic because of their close connection with nature, can a hermetic now summon toxic spirits without going mad in the same manner a shaman does? Can a hermetic be contacted by insect spirits and summon them without taking the insect as a totem (since hermetics don't have totems)? Can a 'shaman' who summons elemental type spirits with no connection to nature turn toxic and still summon those same elementals? Are nature spirits (or whatever their equivalent in SR4 is) still the only type of spirit that becomes 'toxic'? I really want more details on what exactly these new spirit types are and how the rules for them work. |
QUOTE |
chooses 5 they can summon (or are determined by tradition). |
I have a feeling that you guys may be taking this out of proportions. Although it's hard to imagine for me, what the 6 types of spirits might be available at char gen are, because no matter how i do the math, i always think of more than 6 that could be available just coming from the BBB sr.3, i think that going run of the mill shamanic/hermetic will result in some sort of similar set up we have now.
I think i can think of atleast 8 different combinations that would be possible under sr3: choose 5: spirit of the sea, spirit of the sky, spirit of the land, spirit of man, fire elemental, water elemental, earth elemental, air elemental.
perhaps the original author mis-remembered, and the number is actually "choose 4" which would then give you the standard hermetic and shamanic selections?
theres no other way i can think of that would break what is in sr 3 into something similar for sr 4, but this is just a guestimation.
phelious fogg
Jul 5 2005, 05:00 PM
Watcher Spirits
SL James
Jul 5 2005, 05:00 PM
Elementals
Nature Spirits
Spirits of the Elements
Ancestor Spirits
Watchers
(Allies?)
NPC'ish
Blood Spirits
Insect Spirits
Toxic Spirits
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 05:01 PM
QUOTE (Aku @ Jul 5 2005, 10:34 AM) |
QUOTE | chooses 5 they can summon (or are determined by tradition). |
I have a feeling that you guys may be taking this out of proportions. Although it's hard to imagine for me, what the 6 types of spirits might be available at char gen are, because no matter how i do the math, i always think of more than 6 that could be available just coming from the BBB sr.3, i think that going run of the mill shamanic/hermetic will result in some sort of similar set up we have now.
I think i can think of atleast 8 different combinations that would be possible under sr3: choose 5: spirit of the sea, spirit of the sky, spirit of the land, spirit of man, fire elemental, water elemental, earth elemental, air elemental.
perhaps the original author mis-remembered, and the number is actually "choose 4" which would then give you the standard hermetic and shamanic selections?
theres no other way i can think of that would break what is in sr 3 into something similar for sr 4, but this is just a guestimation.
|
I have a hard time coming up with only 6 too.
I'm starting to wonder if those base types include catagories like Watchers, Free Spirits, and Elementals. I know Free Spirits are really just a state of many other types, but they might be classified that way. *shrug*
So then the formerly standard PC totemic spirits; spirit of the sea, spirit of the sky, spirit of the land, spirit of man, etc., get lumped under one base type that the Hermetic tradition does not take. *shrug*
Going that route though i'm coming up short of 6 unless they start including Blood and Toxic. But then there are issues that Hell Hound brings up. Anyone else able to see the catagories that i could be missing going that route?
EDIT: Damn you phelious fogg and your short, quick posts.
Kagetenshi
Jul 5 2005, 05:01 PM
QUOTE (SL James) |
Elementals Nature Spirits Spirits of the Elements Ancestor Spirits Watchers (?) |
Lwa!
~J
SL James
Jul 5 2005, 05:04 PM
Is that a typo of Loa?
Hmm... Some bastardized amalgamation of Loa/Totem/Idol/Pagan God spirits, perhaps?
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 05:10 PM
QUOTE (SL James) |
Elementals Nature Spirits Spirits of the Elements Ancestor Spirits Watchers (Allies?) |
Ally Spirit, that might be one. They took up a lot of space in MitS, they'll be able to fit that in the BBB?
QUOTE |
NPC'ish Blood Spirits Insect Spirits Toxic Spirits |
I'm guessing those wait for Street Magic.
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 05:20 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
QUOTE (blakkie @ Jul 5 2005, 07:39 AM) | That there was nolonger a need for that kludge |
There was never the need for that kludge. The problem with pre-SR4 magic is that people lost sight of what the magic system was designed as and tried to either combine elements that didn't go together (Magician's Way Adept, Unified Magical Theory) or add elements that didn't belong (additional traditions). This problem has been taken to the furthest extreme possible in SR4.
~J
|
Hell Hound
Jul 5 2005, 05:20 PM
QUOTE (SL James) |
Elementals Nature Spirits Spirits of the Elements Ancestor Spirits Watchers (Allies?) |
If these are the categories that's a lot of extra toys for the magic users to play with. Under SR3 no PC magical tradition gets more than three of those. I seem to remember one of the FAQs saying that starting magicians were being powered down which would suggest either those aren't the categories for spirits, the spirits are much less powerfull than they were in SR3, or a starting magicians capacity to summon them is greatly reduced.
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 05:26 PM
QUOTE (Hell Hound @ Jul 5 2005, 11:20 AM) |
QUOTE (SL James) | Elementals Nature Spirits Spirits of the Elements Ancestor Spirits Watchers (Allies?) |
If these are the categories that's a lot of extra toys for the magic users to play with. Under SR3 no PC magical tradition gets more than three of those. I seem to remember one of the FAQs saying that starting magicians were being powered down which would suggest either those aren't the categories for spirits, the spirits are much less powerfull than they were in SR3, or a starting magicians capacity to summon them is greatly reduced.
|
The issue of power is a bit separate. You'd still have to actually be able to summon one that does something. So how useful any given spirit is could be limiting.
Anyway the list i'm at now is:
Elementals
Nature Spirits
Watchers
Allies
Free Spirits (but only of the type of others in your list? or maybe not?)
So i'm one short going down that path. Any ideas there?
but werent ancestor spirits just another type of spirit of man?
and i agree the "corrupt" spirits should and likely will end up being held off until the street magic book. But i think SL james has a better list than i do, aside from the fact that it's also pulling from MiTS, but i think thats a good thing. Have all the available spirit types show up in the core book, and then, for those that may not want to spend the time making their own traditions, letting the street magic book give more archetypes beyond shamanic and hermetic.
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 05:32 PM
QUOTE (Aku) |
but werent ancestor spirits just another type of spirit of man?
and i agree the "corrupt" spirits should and likely will end up being held off until the street magic book. But i think SL james has a better list than i do, aside from the fact that it's also pulling from MiTS, but i think thats a good thing. Have all the available spirit types show up in the core book, and then, for those that may not want to spend the time making their own traditions, letting the street magic book give more archetypes beyond shamanic and hermetic. |
It's the 5 of 6 thing that bugs me there with that list he has. Unless among those 5 you also have a favoured sub-group of type(s) associated with the tradition.
SL James
Jul 5 2005, 05:33 PM
Well, they're listed in MitS with the same weight as Loa, Zombies, Watchers, Allies, Free Spirits, Great Forms, Ghosts, Spirits of the Elements, and "Unique" spirits. I guess they're a type of spirits of man, but they don't seem to be the same in any way else than they have some sort of connection to humanity.
Binding seems to cover Free Spirits and Great Forms if you stretch the interpretation (I won't, but feel free). Maybe it's Allies. Maybe it's something else like Loa, or Ghosts, or Zombies, or something we've never seen before.
Kagetenshi: Ah. Okay.
Kagetenshi
Jul 5 2005, 05:40 PM
QUOTE (SL James @ Jul 5 2005, 12:04 PM) |
Is that a typo of Loa? |
Er, yeah, Loa. Alternate spellings.
~J
tisoz
Jul 5 2005, 05:40 PM
When I heard the 5 of 6 types, I was guessing they would combine all water type spirits, all air type spirits, all spirits of man (ancestor), etc.. But it still doesn't add up.
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 06:00 PM
QUOTE (SL James) |
Binding seems to cover Free Spirits and Great Forms if you stretch the interpretation (I won't, but feel free). Maybe it's Allies. |
I was running on the assumption that you would first Summon and then Bind to get any given bound spirit. But the Free Spirits type would have a different property than the others that if you don't immediately Bind them, or fail to Bind them, the Free Spirit is not under the obligations that, say, an unbound Nature Spirit would be.
Great Forms as the sixth type? It doesn't quite seem right. *shrug*
QUOTE |
When I heard the 5 of 6 types, I was guessing they would combine all water type spirits, all air type spirits, all spirits of man (ancestor), etc.. But it still doesn't add up. |
I did at first to, but found the idea of a Hermetic Summoning a Mountain spirit rather disturbing plus didn't see the 6 adding up. So then i tried working backwards to see how close i could get the Shamans and Hermetics to how they were under SR3 and remembered Watchers, which would need defining.
I'm still one type short though from mostly duplicating the old Hermetic and Shaman traditions.
Cheops
Jul 5 2005, 06:09 PM
I think tisoz is right because I kind of remember one of the people at the demos saying that mages choose from specific types not broad categories so choices would be something like:
spirits of man
spirits of the sky
spirits of the water
drekcetera
I have the sneaking suspicion that loas, ancestors, et al will once again be lumped into the Street Magic book.
Allies are a separate category altogether since they can be any type of spirit and are basically just souped up bound spirits.
hobgoblin
Jul 5 2005, 06:14 PM
QUOTE (Aku) |
but werent ancestor spirits just another type of spirit of man? |
checked mits to be sure, and from what i found they are not related to spirits of man in any other way then this: some shamans remove the ability to summon spirits of man to gain the ability to summon ancestor spirits...
they even come from their own metaplane, one that takes on the visitors idea of an afterlife...
blakkie
Jul 5 2005, 07:45 PM
QUOTE (Cheops @ Jul 5 2005, 12:09 PM) |
I think tisoz is right because I kind of remember one of the people at the demos saying that mages choose from specific types not broad categories so choices would be something like:
spirits of man spirits of the sky spirits of the water drekcetera
I have the sneaking suspicion that loas, ancestors, et al will once again be lumped into the Street Magic book.
Allies are a separate category altogether since they can be any type of spirit and are basically just souped up bound spirits. |
I figured with the Ally spirit just like the Free Spirit, which is also more of a state of one other type of spirit. But it is also sort of a type of spirit when you talk about what you can magically deal with since you can indenture most Free Spirits regardless of whether the original spirit form is one that you could conjure.
I guess we'll just have to wait for someone that ran in the demo as either a hermetic or glanced at the hermetic PC and noted Summoning options to be sure.
P.S. I still want to hear from Caine Hazen about what he meant by the "6/9 max roof that other attributes have".
Ellery
Jul 6 2005, 07:33 AM
Going with the "combine all fire spirits" idea:
Fire Spirit
Water Spirit
Air Spirit
Earth Spirit
Heart Spirit
Watcher Spirit
That makes six, plus if you choose correctly you can summon Captain Planet.
Cheops
Jul 6 2005, 09:25 AM
Well...all the munchkins will be sure that they can take Captain Planet...I can't see how SR4 can not have him be the best of the spirits...
Hell Hound
Jul 6 2005, 09:48 AM
QUOTE (Ellery) |
Going with the "combine all fire spirits" idea:
Fire Spirit Water Spirit Air Spirit Earth Spirit Heart Spirit Watcher Spirit
That makes six, plus if you choose correctly you can summon Captain Planet. |
Now why did you have to go and mention Captain Planet? That's several years worth of therapy undone.
If spirits are in fact being categorized along the lines of elements does that mean that the old distinctions between nature spirits and elementals; as in how they are summoned, what their powers are, and their connection to their surroundings, will now be passed to the bound/unbound division. Will it be bound spirits that provide spellcasting dice and unbound spirits that help conceal the summoner within their domain? Or will those powers be available to all spirits, bound or unbound, so that a magician can conjure up a spirit to both hide them from their enemies and provide extra dice for their next spell?
hobgoblin
Jul 6 2005, 11:23 AM
QUOTE (Ellery) |
Going with the "combine all fire spirits" idea:
Fire Spirit Water Spirit Air Spirit Earth Spirit Heart Spirit Watcher Spirit
That makes six, plus if you choose correctly you can summon Captain Planet. |
given the big guys stand on pollution i wonder if captain planet would be labeled as terrorist propaganda these days
tisoz
Jul 6 2005, 11:27 AM
QUOTE (Hell Hound @ Jul 6 2005, 03:48 AM) |
If spirits are in fact being categorized along the lines of elements does that mean that the old distinctions between nature spirits and elementals; as in how they are summoned, what their powers are, and their connection to their surroundings, will now be passed to the bound/unbound division. Will it be bound spirits that provide spellcasting dice and unbound spirits that help conceal the summoner within their domain? Or will those powers be available to all spirits, bound or unbound, so that a magician can conjure up a spirit to both hide them from their enemies and provide extra dice for their next spell? |
I'm guessing summoning bound spirits will be similar to how hermetics conjured elementals and summoning unbound spirits will be similar to how shamen conjured. Perhaps the unbound ones will be limited by surroundings in some way, or that aspect of the game might be gone.
If the goal is to keep it simple, then the powers should be constant. The bound/unbound thing seems to be no more than how they are summoned and how long they stay around.
Hell Hound
Jul 6 2005, 11:53 AM
I suspect that that bound and unbound will match up with elementals and nature spirits in terms of summoning setup. Unbound will probably be on a time limit and what kind of spirit you can get will be restricted by where you are when you try to summon one. Bound will probably take time to summon but not have a time limit before it leaves, and you can get any kind of spirit you want by preparing the right materials for the summoning process.
For me the bigger question is will all the spirit powers and uses from 3rd edition still be there? The powers of nature spirits (conealment, movement, accident, etc), the uses for elementals (sustaining spells, bonus spell dice, extra set of 'hands' in combat), the powers of the loa (possessing the summoner or another person), will they still all be present? I suppose one possibility is that the spirit 'types' will define the powers those spirits have as well as or instead of their elemental affiliations.
tisoz
Jul 6 2005, 12:04 PM
Unfortunately, we do not have anywhere near enough information for me to guess how they are doing powers. It is a guess just to try to figure how they are getting 6 types.
Caine Hazen
Jul 6 2005, 04:19 PM
Tisoz got it there...at least that's what I remember from the presentation. Unbound are like shaman's spirits...time limit, from sunup to sundown or vicy versa, and bound will take longer, but last longer (likely a # of services based on opposed successes)
And I think the elemental style breakdown with the addition of Wacthers and hearth/man are about how its going to go. Most of the extrainious spirits will likey be in Street Magic (toxics, Insects, drekcetera)...I think your tradition will define how you percive and use the spirits (Shintos will see spirits of man as ancestors, while a hermetic might see a golem or bound demon)
well just another 2
from your freindly nieghborhood Hazenator...
Not of this World
Jul 6 2005, 08:27 PM
QUOTE (Kagetenshi) |
QUOTE (blakkie @ Jul 5 2005, 07:39 AM) | That there was nolonger a need for that kludge |
There was never the need for that kludge. The problem with pre-SR4 magic is that people lost sight of what the magic system was designed as and tried to either combine elements that didn't go together (Magician's Way Adept, Unified Magical Theory) or add elements that didn't belong (additional traditions). This problem has been taken to the furthest extreme possible in SR4.
~J
|
Just repeating this mainly for emphasis.
For all the mess of rules SR1 was, the magic was easy to understand when we had mages, shamans, adepts and no 1000 degrees of mix between them. The sterility of corporate mages with their formulaic magic and the raw emotion of a simple people displaying their emotions in magic and blowing up volcanoes has been lost.
It might have the name, but Shadowrun is really losing that feel of Magic Vs. Machine.
hobgoblin
Jul 6 2005, 09:35 PM
lets wait with the judgement until we see it in print ok?
it may well sound worse then it is...
Bandwidthoracle
Jul 6 2005, 10:54 PM
QUOTE (Not of this World) |
Just repeating this mainly for emphasis.
For all the mess of rules SR1 was, the magic was easy to understand when we had mages, shamans, adepts and no 1000 degrees of mix between them. The sterility of corporate mages with their formulaic magic and the raw emotion of a simple people displaying their emotions in magic and blowing up volcanoes has been lost.
It might have the name, but Shadowrun is really losing that feel of Magic Vs. Machine. |
I think this is more perspetive than fact.
The hermetics aren't all corporatly owned. Nor all all shamans emotional, or even simple people. At least my group has always played that the corps are evil, but are only motivated by greed. Most of the shamanic groups are far darker in purpose (Again perspetive)