Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Katrina
Dumpshock Forums > Discussion > Shadowrun
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
jhsiao
The concept of aiming/shooting with intent to kill typically comes with some firearms training, but not everyone has firearms training or even safety training.

If the person was trained in gun safety, would they be firing at the helicopter? Probably not. I would tend to believe that anyone with actual firearms training would never shoot at a helicopter, even in desperation.

But that opens up a large number of people ignorant on gun safety and helicopter vulnerability (e.g. children). What's the phrase? "Never attribute to maliciousness that which can adequately be explained by mere stupidity."

Is it some punk wanting to play with his gun? Maybe, but the situation I described was an exercise in how desperation can result in crazy behavior.

I can understand better that gangs would steal food and water and rape women at gunpoint. I can understand attacking a hospital for medicine or drugs. Both of those have a "benefit" to the shooters/snipers. But I don't see much gain to shooting a rescue helicopter. So I tend to lean away from a malicious reason and lean towards the stupid (looking for fame or practice) or the desperate (looking for help) for helicopter shootings.

Incidentally, I'd be interested to know how some folks might try to get out of the situation I outlined above. Light a signal fire? Swim? MacGuyver a boat?

Edit: added paragraph about gangs.
John Campbell
I quite frankly do not believe that there exists anyone who is capable of operating a firearm effectively enough to threaten a helicopter, yet so mindbogglingly stupid that they do not understand that shooting at the helicopter puts the helicopter at risk and is unlikely to do anything to encourage the helicopter to help them.

"Punk playing with his gun" I'll believe, but I fail to see how that doesn't qualify as "malicious".
Kagetenshi
One does not need to actually be a threat to a helicopter to make the operator feel threatened.

~J
ShadowDragon8685
jhsiao, if you don't have any firearms safety training, formal or otherwise, you have no FREAKING right firing a weapon.

And I'd first try to light a signal fire, or launch a flare if I had one (You can buy a flare pistol for about 20 bucks at Wal Mart in their boating section, and a pack of extre flares costs about 8 bucks.)

Second to that would be MacGuyvering a boat. Failing that, and assuming I have the gun you mentioned, I swim for it, trying to stay in the water as little as possible, and making my way from rooftop to rooftop to safety. I employ my firearm to kill as many dangerous animals as possible. ('gators, those really poisonous snakes, etcetera.)
ShadowDragon8685
And of course, one stray shot can headshot the pilot, killing the whole chopper and anyone below it.


"Never attribute to malice..." only works when there actually isen't any malice afoot.
Kagetenshi
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685)
jhsiao, if you don't have any firearms safety training, formal or otherwise, you have no FREAKING right firing a weapon.

The untrained are the entire reason firearms were invented.

~J
Talia Invierno
And of course, those trained, with a responsible attitude toward the gun, and with full knowledge of what that gun is capable of doing are the ONLY people in the United States with the right to bear arms. Which constitutional amendment was that again?

(Does anyone have access to that SR2 BBB quote by Governor Schultz, something to the effect of nothing being wrong in Seattle that a few thousand troops can't fix?)
Sicarius
If you are a "Benefiting" from the disorder, than discouraging the restoration of order would be beneficial as well wouldn't it?

intentional and malicious would very well fit, if that was the case.
blakkie
QUOTE (ShadowDragon8685 @ Sep 1 2005, 09:17 PM)
.... And they specifically said snipers, like he was shooting at the pilots.


You do not, DO NOT, shoot a firearm at something you do not mean to kill. I can understand firing a shot in the air to flag down help, but not shooting AT the chopper.

Ya, well that celebrating Afgan wedding party was apparently shooting at those USAF fighter jets too before they were bombed to hell and back. sarcastic.gif

Sometimes observation mistakes are made, and when you hear/see gunshots is it damn unnerving. *shrug*

EDIT: This of course does not preclude the very real possibility of truth of any given report of a chopper being shot, for whatever reason. Attention, anger, sun boiled brain, just general dumbass, etc.
TheOneRonin
FIY, Martial Law HAS been declared in New Orleans. Here's a quote from Governor Kathleen Blanco:

Gov. Kathleen Blanco called the looters "hoodlums" and issued a warning to lawbreakers: Hundreds of National Guard troops hardened on the battlefield in Iraq have landed in New Orleans.

"They have M-16s and they're locked and loaded," she said. "These troops know how to shoot and kill, and they are more than willing to do so, and I expect they will."



Also, the USS Harry S. Truman is on it's way with an assload of Marines.

And keep your eyes on the Baton Rouge news, especially www.theadvocate.com. I had my picture taken by a news photographer yesterday as I picked up a new 12 gauge and some slugs at a local firearms store that was PACKED. Took me 3 hours to get in, get the shotgun, and checkout.

durthang
Murdering assholes or not, does it worry anyone that America is turning her troops against American citizens?
Jrayjoker
QUOTE (durthang)
Murdering assholes or not, does it worry anyone that America is turning her troops against American citizens?

I would like to think that the governor's comments were a result of extreme stress and righteous indignation at an untennable situation. The lawlesness is not appropriate and should be dealt with, but I hope the troops have a great deal of restraint if attacked.

That being said, if they are attacked they should use any means appropriate and necessary to respond and subdue the attackers.

Really, who in their right mind is going to try and take pot shots at a squad of combat vets?
hobgoblin
right now? anyone that dont want to go back to the "old" times...
jhsiao
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Really, who in their right mind is going to try and take pot shots at a squad of combat vets?


Uh...Somalis, Talibanis, Baathists, terrorists...the list goes on. Granted, I think these folks probably value their lives less (or value American deaths more) than the shooters in NO, but the chance of retaliation in NO is so much less. No UAVs, no air support, no armor, no intel, all in a purely defensive position. Are troops going to wade into the waters to flush out a den of shooters? Are troops going to call in an airstrike in a US city to take out a sniper? Would you say the risk of collateral (and political) damage is higher conducting combat operations off the French Quarter versus say Mosul?

People will either look at anarchy as an opportunity or as a menace.

Reminds me of a question posed by my brother after Hurricane Andrew: "If you knew for certain that you would never be punished or caught, would you loot?"

Without hesitation, I said no, but before people start going "I would never steal anything because I can", just think of the justifications given for music/software piracy (e.g. not enough money, just want to try it out, the companies are rich anyway). And these justifications are much weaker than the ones that can be claimed in NO (survival). Even though there is a definite demarcation between people's moralities in the physical world vs. the online world, the online world is effectively anarchy.

In some instances, some folks pirate just because they can--just like those folks in NO who are looting big screen TVs (what are you gonna do with that without electricity?).

Likely the feelings most of us have against these gangs/anarchists reflect the feelings most people in the SR world have against runners. Perhaps people can take their rage against the looters in NO and better roleplay Lone Star or corporate security or corporate hackers. Because as runners, you're taking shots at the equivalent of hospitals or law-abiding people or stealing private property.
blakkie
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Really, who in their right mind is going to try and take pot shots at a squad of combat vets?

That assumes all people having a right mind under very stressful situations. Same can be said about looting for food & water. As the precieved chance of living or dieing rises you are going to see the levels of value people put on the morales of theft. Especially when you start getting "i'm just borrowing, i intend to pay back" or "this stuff is gonna go to waste anyway" or the highly dubious but always popular "he's doing it, if i don't get me some it's all gone anyway".
Velocity
Just to throw a little more kindling on the fire, according to Canadian and British news outlets (I think CNN may have also picked it up), some of the troops being stationed in New Orleans have just returned from Iraq.

The combination of A) shellshocked troops fresh from an urban warzone and B) the starving poor of New Orleans has me waiting for the first report of a panicked National Guard soldier firing into a desperate crowd.
Demonseed Elite
It is a real mess down there, and it's sad. Obviously, it's no direct parallel to any events in Shadowrun, but it's close enough to be tragic. Something like the scene in New Orleans would have been something I'd have written as fiction before. It's not really fiction now.
blakkie
QUOTE (Velocity @ Sep 2 2005, 08:23 AM)
Just to throw a little more kindling on the fire, according to Canadian and British news outlets (I think CNN may have also picked it up), some of the troops being stationed in New Orleans have just returned from Iraq.

The combination of A) shellshocked troops fresh from an urban warzone and B) the starving poor of New Orleans has me waiting for the first report of a panicked National Guard soldier firing into a desperate crowd.

TheOneRonin's quote of the Govennor mentions that too.

I don't know, i'm thinking i'd rather have experience than green in there and trust that the extra little bit of caution that they'll have knowing it is a fellow countryman at the end of the barrel will be enough.

QUOTE
It is a real mess down there, and it's sad. Obviously, it's no direct parallel to any events in Shadowrun, but it's close enough to be tragic. Something like the scene in New Orleans would have been something I'd have written as fiction before. It's not really fiction now.


It has always been, over the long run, a high probability senario for a huge hurricane to landfall there. A bit weaker one and the leeves might have been able to hold, but cat 5 hurricanes do happen in the Gulf with a scary regularity.
TheOneRonin
Incidently, the levees around New Orleans were only rated for Cat 3 hurricanes and below.

And a little bit on the National Guard guys coming here from Iraq. I served in the Guard (MechInf) and I've been deployed. The worst thing you can tell a soldier after he's just gotten orders to come home is that he can't ACTUALLY come home, but instead he's got to deal with people looting and causing havok in a flooded out city that he might not have ever even been too. His disdain for these looters will actually be much worse than whatever he felt towards the insurgents in Iraq. That will play a VERY heavy role in how these guys actually respond to whatever goes on once they are here.

And it won't be pretty.
blakkie
QUOTE (TheOneRonin @ Sep 2 2005, 08:53 AM)
Incidently, the levees around New Orleans were only rated for Cat 3 hurricanes and below. 

I landfell at Cat 4 though, right? I thought it had slowed up a few hours before the core of it hit? It's hard for a hurricane to maintain top form when it starts passing over land of any significant size (as opposed to some poor little island).


QUOTE
And a little bit on the National Guard guys coming here from Iraq.  I served in the Guard (MechInf) and I've been deployed.  The worst thing you can tell a soldier after he's just gotten orders to come home is that he can't ACTUALLY come home, but instead he's got to deal with people looting and causing havok in a flooded out city that he might not have ever even been too.  His disdain for these looters will actually be much worse than whatever he felt towards the insurgents in Iraq.  That will play a VERY heavy role in how these guys actually respond to whatever goes on once they are here. 

And it won't be pretty.


So they are coming in without any downtime? Er, if so ya that could be a bad scene. Especially with the folks that had their time overseas greatly extended. Have supplies started coming into your area? Or are their road problems yet?
TheOneRonin
QUOTE (blakkie)
QUOTE (TheOneRonin @ Sep 2 2005, 08:53 AM)
Incidently, the levees around New Orleans were only rated for Cat 3 hurricanes and below. 

I landfell at Cat 4 though, right? I thought it had slowed up a few hours before the core of it hit? It's hard for a hurricane to maintain top form when it starts passing over land of any significant size (as opposed to some poor little island).


Yeah, Katrina was a Cat 4 when it hit, but that's still over what the levees have been rated for. And it wasn't long on lad before it dropped to a Cat 3, but it was just long enough.


QUOTE (blakkie)
QUOTE
And a little bit on the National Guard guys coming here from Iraq.  I served in the Guard (MechInf) and I've been deployed.  The worst thing you can tell a soldier after he's just gotten orders to come home is that he can't ACTUALLY come home, but instead he's got to deal with people looting and causing havok in a flooded out city that he might not have ever even been too.  His disdain for these looters will actually be much worse than whatever he felt towards the insurgents in Iraq.  That will play a VERY heavy role in how these guys actually respond to whatever goes on once they are here. 

And it won't be pretty.


So they are coming in without any downtime? Er, if so ya that could be a bad scene. Especially with the folks that had their time overseas greatly extended. Have supplies started coming into your area? Or are their road problems yet?


From what I have heard, yeah, these guys are being pulled straight from Iraq. No downtime whatsoever.

I can't comment on supplies, but the roads here (Baton Rouge) are beyond capacity. Since we are the nearest functional metropolitan area to New Orleans, we are playing host to most of the refugees...and not only people from New Orleans, but the surrounding areas like Mandeville and Slidell. In fact, many of those people are coming into Baton Rouge for gasoline, food, and supplies, then heading out back to their homes. I haven't gotten any word of any shortages yet, but we are just about the only place you can find gasoline within 60 miles west of New Orleans.

durthang
QUOTE
Really, who in their right mind is going to try and take pot shots at a squad of combat vets?


Kent State anyone? I believe that anyone who attacks armed troops deserves what they get, but the governor’s quotes are worrisome.

While I am all for stopping the anarchy and getting the refugees out, I think we should all watch this very carefully. This has the possibility of setting some bad precedents when it comes to using the US military in times of crisis.
Blacken
At this point, I see a shoot-to-kill order on the charming folks trotting down the streets with TVs in their arms as almost reasonable. Do I like it? No. I'd rather not see Americans gunning down other Americans. But with the predatory gangs roaming the city and the insane looting, would I rather there be rape victims and burned-out/cleaned-out stores or dead rapists and looters?

Gotta go with the latter on that one...

EDIT: And it's official, I'm just not that bright. Fixed the statement to read correctly.
Jrayjoker
QUOTE (Blacken)
At this point, I see a shoot-to-kill order on the charming folks trotting down the streets with TVs in their arms as almost reasonable. Do I like it? No. I'd rather not see Americans gunning down other Americans. But with the predatory gangs roaming the city and the insane looting, would I rather there be rape victims and burned-out/cleaned-out stores or dead rapists and looters?

Gotta go with the former on that one...

Let me get this straight, you'd rather there be rapists and looters than people stopping rapists and looters? Just checking.
Jrayjoker
Maybe you should head on down to NO with a shopping cart full of beer and cigarettes in a skirt and see if you change your mind...
Blacken
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
QUOTE (Blacken @ Sep 2 2005, 11:05 AM)
At this point, I see a shoot-to-kill order on the charming folks trotting down the streets with TVs in their arms as almost reasonable. Do I like it? No. I'd rather not see Americans gunning down other Americans. But with the predatory gangs roaming the city and the insane looting, would I rather there be rape victims and burned-out/cleaned-out stores or dead rapists and looters?

Gotta go with the former on that one...

Let me get this straight, you'd rather there be rapists and looters than people stopping rapists and looters? Just checking.

...Wow, you entirely missed what I said, didn't you?

I said that I would rather there be dead rapists and looters than rape victims and burned-out/emptied stores.
Sharaloth
Read your own statement again, Blacken. Former means 'first'. You said rape victims and burned out/cleanded out stores first, and dead rapists and looters second (latter).
Blacken
Holy Jesus. You're right; I'm an idiot. I'm having a similar discussion with IRL friends on AIM and I said it in reverse there and mixed myself up.

/me beats his face off the wall.

Mea culpa, mea culpa. Lemme go fix that.
blakkie
QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
QUOTE (Blacken @ Sep 2 2005, 11:05 AM)
At this point, I see a shoot-to-kill order on the charming folks trotting down the streets with TVs in their arms as almost reasonable. Do I like it? No. I'd rather not see Americans gunning down other Americans. But with the predatory gangs roaming the city and the insane looting, would I rather there be rape victims and burned-out/cleaned-out stores or dead rapists and looters?

Gotta go with the former on that one...

Let me get this straight, you'd rather there be rapists and looters than people stopping rapists and looters? Just checking.

Such short memories. Such gunho reactions ended up getting a [increasingly innocent looking] Brazilian shot on the London Underground what, a month ago?
Velocity
QUOTE (blakkie)
Such short memories. Such gunho reactions ended up getting a [increasingly innocent looking] Brazilian shot on the London Underground what, a month ago?

Completely 100% innocent, actually. Work visa in order, travel papers up to date, no criminal record, sent money home to support aging parents. Absolutely zero links to anything more serious than a parking ticket. Jean Charles de Menezes was totally innocent.
TheOneRonin
Right. Because people who are totally innocent always run from the cops. God knows I do it all the time. I mean, it makes sense to feel from law enforcement when you've done nothing wrong. It's not like it will make you look guilty or anything.
durthang
People who are scared run, not just the guilty.
Talia Invierno
de Menezes didn't run from the police. Which isn't to say that in a stressful situation, I might not have seen it differently, had I been in the shoes of the police.

Bringing in the military is not the same thing as martial law. So long as the military serves under civilian command (technically "peace officers"), martial law does not exist.

Please, let's leave as much of the outside politics out of this one as possible. There's two other threads for that.
Critias
There's a world of difference between a dark-complected guy in a jacket running from cops in a recently-bombed subway, and gangs of thugs with machetes and knives raping women then killing them.

Most of the large groups ("packs") that are taking part in the barbaric actions (the violence, the extreme looting, etc), are known gang members of some of New Orleans' largest criminal organizations, with their numbers recently doubled/trebled by released prisoners. You aren't going to mistake them for an old woman stealing tylenol and canned foods. They are roving packs of predators taking what they want (be it women or material possessions or simply lives). They are what the US Marine Corps was created to fucking stomp on.
TheOneRonin
QUOTE (Critias)
There's a world of difference between a dark-complected guy in a jacket running from cops in a recently-bombed subway, and gangs of thugs with machetes and knives raping women then killing them. 

Most of the large groups ("packs") that are taking part in the barbaric actions (the violence, the extreme looting, etc), are known gang members of some of New Orleans' largest criminal organizations, with their numbers recently doubled/trebled by released prisoners.  You aren't going to mistake them for an old woman stealing tylenol and canned foods.  They are roving packs of predators taking what they want (be it women or material possessions or simply lives).  They are what the US Marine Corps was created to fucking stomp on.

Amen.
Eldritch
Hey 'Ronin, it's kinda cool getting the inside scoop from someone on the scene.

Thanks for taking the time.

And good luck.
blakkie
QUOTE (Critias @ Sep 2 2005, 11:42 AM)
Most of the large groups ("packs") that are taking part in the barbaric actions (the violence, the extreme looting, etc), are known gang members of some of New Orleans' largest criminal organizations, with their numbers recently doubled/trebled by released prisoners.  You aren't going to mistake them for an old woman stealing tylenol and canned foods.

The problem is when they come upon the grey between. frown.gif Grey like a latino that one glance at his photo, even by a pasty white boy like me, is entirely distiquishable from being from anywhere in Asia. Someone who's actions can be mistaken if you assume some key facts that are untrue.

Hey, send in the military. Damn straight. But revving up the gungho rhetoric like is not only is possibily going to over hype the Marines. These guys are pros, or at least semi-pros that have been doing a pro's job, and i'd hope that their CO's are going to be able to amplify any orders from above to motivate them. But it will also do severe damage to any attempt at public relations if someone that likely shouldn't get shot does.

P.S. The people that are vaguely smart [truely dangerous] have likely been watching getting ready to melt like butter into the background once a full fledged, mobile force shows up. You think they are going to try hold territory when platoons of AR toting soilders trained to work/fight in these kinds of conditions start rolling into town in force?
Shadow
QUOTE (Critias)
There's a world of difference between a dark-complected guy in a jacket running from cops in a recently-bombed subway, and gangs of thugs with machetes and knives raping women then killing them.

Most of the large groups ("packs") that are taking part in the barbaric actions (the violence, the extreme looting, etc), are known gang members of some of New Orleans' largest criminal organizations, with their numbers recently doubled/trebled by released prisoners. You aren't going to mistake them for an old woman stealing tylenol and canned foods. They are roving packs of predators taking what they want (be it women or material possessions or simply lives). They are what the US Marine Corps was created to fucking stomp on.

Semper Fi. Those people who prey on the weak and the helpless are exactly the kind of people who need to get a bullet to the brain pan. Defending the weak and the helpless is what this country is about. And if I need to buy a frickin SKS and stockpile 2000 rounds of ammo to do it I should be allowed to.

How long did it take civilization to break down? 1 day? 2 on the outside? It will be another two weeks before it is restored. I feel for the people who are trapped their with the lunatics. I only wish they ALL had guns to defend themselves.
TheOneRonin
RE Eldritch:

I'm just glad I can help. The rumor-mill is full-bore, and I think people need to know what is REALLY going on down here. I can't be everywhere at once, but I figured this board is a good place to start.



RE Blakkie:

I've gotten word that the troops arriving in New Orleans are gonna basically be under civil police command. It seems like the people in charge, as upset as they may be over what is happening, are trying to be as delicate as possible. I don't think there will be any "shoot looters on site" orders, but I guarantee that any one who the run into that is armed will likely get only one change to comply.

Also, if you are not sure of the scope of the destruction in downtown New Orleans, the roaming gangs likely haven't been watching anything, or even listening to the radio due to the lack of power and pretty much all other resources in the area.
Lady Door
Hey there... I've been checking out this thread and everyday it seems there's something else on the news that just about tears my heart out. I know it's not much but if there's someone down there or if you know of someone down there that can recieve packages and needs help (Especially if they have children.. I have three myself and I want to do something for them...) I would like to send what they need. Formula, diapers, water, clothes, non-perishables.. etc. If you know of someone that could use this or if you know of somewhere else I could post this, please let myself or Fist3.0 (my husband) know. We'll do whatever we can.
Demonseed Elite
QUOTE
I've gotten word that the troops arriving in New Orleans are gonna basically be under civil police command. It seems like the people in charge, as upset as they may be over what is happening, are trying to be as delicate as possible. I don't think there will be any "shoot looters on site" orders, but I guarantee that any one who the run into that is armed will likely get only one change to comply.


Yeah, Lt. General Honore, who is in charge of the military effort, called the N.O. Chief of Police his "battle commander", so it sounds like the civilan police are ultimately in charge.

And the word from the reporters on site at the Convention Center has been clear that Lt. General Honore has been moving up and down the line of National Guard telling them to shoulder their weapons, that there will be no firing, and that it is a humanitarian relief effort, not Iraq.
Critias
QUOTE (blakkie @ Sep 2 2005, 01:08 PM)
Hey, send in the military. Damn straight. But revving up the gungho rhetoric like is not only is possibily going to over hype the Marines. These guys are pros, or at least semi-pros that have been doing a pro's job, and i'd hope that their CO's are going to be able to amplify any orders from above to motivate them. But it will also do severe damage to any attempt at public relations if someone that likely shouldn't get shot does.

P.S. The people that are vaguely smart [truely dangerous] have likely been watching getting ready to melt like butter into the background once a full fledged, mobile force shows up. You think they are going to try hold territory when platoons of AR toting soilders trained to work/fight in these kinds of conditions start rolling into town in force?

Fuck public relations. People need to stop fucking shooting at support choppers, people need to not mob-hump trucks with supplies, people need to not shoot at National Guardsmen and cops and EMTs and firefighters. People need to not burn down their city, rape and murder young girls at knifepoint, and go apeshit fucking nuts because a nasty storm rolled through.

Send amphibious carriers through first. They'll be able to move however/wherever is needed. Keep 'em closed up tight, or let 'em stay open but be bristling with unshaven Marines carrying loaded weapons with orders only to shoot if fired upon. Have a psychological operations specialist (or just a gunny) aboard each one, with a megaphone (or just a gunny voice), stating loudly and clearly over and over again that in one hours' time they will come back, and anyone on the streets and impeding the progress of emergency vehicles through action, inaction, implied threat, gunfire, or even just screaming obscenities will get bloodied up by the Corp like Tina Turner by Ike.

One hour later, roll in with the supplies that need to get to wherever they need to get to, the choppers for airlifting those that need it, the water trucks, the empty trucks for carrying people out of their, and the boy scout troops to give people MREs, a bottle of gatorade, and help them pitch a fucking tent. If people -- people as warned an hour previously -- impede this progress, shoot them like you would any other terrorist.

Boom. Problem solved.

And, yes. The "truly dangerous" ones will melt away when the men in green show up. That's fine. I'd prefer they stick around and get their barbaric asses killed, but if they just leave -- fine. They won't hold the territory any more -- fine. They're not in the fucking way any more, are they? So the job still gets done. That's what counts.
blakkie
QUOTE (TheOneRonin @ Sep 2 2005, 12:22 PM)
I've gotten word that the troops arriving in New Orleans are gonna basically be under civil police command.  It seems like the people in charge, as upset as they may be over what is happening, are trying to be as delicate as possible.  I don't think there will be any "shoot looters on site" orders, but I guarantee that any one who the run into that is armed will likely get only one change to comply.

Ya, i hope. I just find it disturbing that that is coming from a Gov...and people are supporting it. It was my -exact- first reaction when the fellow was shot in London, even though the first "eye witness" stuff coming out said it was righteous, and a mayor was spouting the similar gungho rhetoric.

Now where she'll sit in the effective chain of command is not apparent. But if something goes wrong there is what people will see, and it might not all be perception.

QUOTE
Also, if you are not sure of the scope of the destruction in downtown New Orleans, the roaming gangs likely haven't been watching anIything, or even listening to the radio due to the lack of power and pretty much all other resources in the area.


I mean watching in a somewhat passive sense, and i was under the impression that cell coverage is still operating. If you have a car charger for your phone, and there are still some cars that are electrically functioning, they will have communications.

I also assumed that the Marines aren't going to come in all sneaky like. If they are there to restore order (as opposed to trying to catch people in the act) they are going to come in with a flury. Making big noise to let people, good and bad, know that the big dog is back and order WILL be restored. Or is that a bad assumption on my part?
TheOneRonin
QUOTE (Plan B)
Hey there... I've been checking out this thread and everyday it seems there's something else on the news that just about tears my heart out.  I know it's not much but if there's someone down there or if you know of someone down there that can recieve packages and needs help (Especially if they have children.. I have three myself and I want to do something for them...) I would like to send what they need. Formula, diapers, water, clothes, non-perishables.. etc. If you know of someone that could use this or if you know of somewhere else I could post this, please let myself or Fist3.0 (my husband) know. We'll do whatever we can.

I makes me smile to see so many people so willing to help during this crisis. Plan B, the best thing you and your husband can do is contact the Red Cross. Honestly, the most needed donation right now is money. Sending supplies is a bad idea because they keep getting all different kinds of items that they have to sort, check, and stage. With cash, they can get supplies in bulk, which will arrive when and where they need them to be. If you want to give to any organization more specific, shoot me an e-mail and I will help you find what you are looking for.
TheOneRonin
QUOTE (blakkie)

I mean watching in a somewhat passive sense, and i was under the impression that cell coverage is still operating. If you have a car charger for your phone, and there are still some cars that are electrically functioning, they will have communications.



Sorry bro, but it's worse than you think. Cell coverage is spotty at best, and only about 30% of calls are getting through, and that's here in Baton Rouge where we still have most of our towers. In and around NO, cell coverage is borderline non-existant...and even if you get a signal, you are not likely to be able to make any calls due to network congestion.

We (my company) are at the point where we have to use land lines for almost everything because of the unreliablity of cells.
jhsiao
QUOTE (Critias)
Fuck public relations.  People need to stop fucking shooting at support choppers, people need to not mob-hump trucks with supplies, people need to not shoot at National Guardsmen and cops and EMTs and firefighters.  People need to not burn down their city, rape and murder young girls at knifepoint, and go apeshit fucking nuts because a nasty storm rolled through. 

Send amphibious carriers through first.  They'll be able to move however/wherever is needed.  Keep 'em closed up tight, or let 'em stay open but be bristling with unshaven Marines carrying loaded weapons with orders only to shoot if fired upon.  Have a psychological operations specialist (or just a gunny) aboard each one, with a megaphone (or just a gunny voice), stating loudly and clearly over and over again that in one hours' time they will come back, and anyone on the streets and impeding the progress of emergency vehicles through action, inaction, implied threat, gunfire, or even just screaming obscenities will get bloodied up by the Corp like Tina Turner by Ike. 

One hour later, roll in with the supplies that need to get to wherever they need to get to, the choppers for airlifting those that need it, the water trucks, the empty trucks for carrying people out of their, and the boy scout troops to give people MREs, a bottle of gatorade, and help them pitch a fucking tent.  If people -- people as warned an hour previously -- impede this progress, shoot them like you would any other terrorist.

Boom.  Problem solved.

And, yes.  The "truly dangerous" ones will melt away when the men in green show up.  That's fine.  I'd prefer they stick around and get their barbaric asses killed, but if they just leave -- fine.  They won't hold the territory any more -- fine.  They're not in the fucking way any more, are they?  So the job still gets done.  That's what counts.


Is territory what the bandits (let's stop using "looter") want? The "thunder run" concept worked initially in Somalia and Iraq, but ran into troubles later. Are we going to treat the bandits like an urban insurgency?

It might be hyperbole or the anger talking, but since we don't shoot people in Afghanistan or Iraq for screaming obscenities at troops (do we?), why would we treat US citizens worse? Or is that the psyops?

[smartass] So if I needed assistance, all I would need to do is shoot at a chopper, hide in my house, and wait one hour after the Bradleys roll to get food, water, shelter, and possible rescue?

Wouldn't alot of people in NO find that a fantastic deal? [/smartass]
Arethusa
QUOTE (blakkie)
I also assumed that the Marines aren't going to come in all sneaky like. If they are there to restore order (as opposed to trying to catch people in the act) they are going to come in with a flury. Making big noise to let people, good and bad, know that the big dog is back and order WILL be restored. Or is that a bad assumption on my part?

That is a reasonable assumption, but that sort of show of force (emphasis on show) may also be unlikely due to pr concerns. It is notable that a large amount of Bush's constituencency is affected and a larger amount will be watching closely; he and his administration may step a bit lighter than they would otherwise.

Moreover, there may not be manpower left for that sort of thing; a very sizable portion of our military is currently sandier.
PBTHHHHT
QUOTE (TheOneRonin)
Sorry bro, but it's worse than you think. Cell coverage is spotty at best, and only about 30% of calls are getting through, and that's here in Baton Rouge where we still have most of our towers. In and around NO, cell coverage is borderline non-existant...and even if you get a signal, you are not likely to be able to make any calls due to network congestion.

We (my company) are at the point where we have to use land lines for almost everything because of the unreliablity of cells.

Back on 9/11, I had a heck of a time using my cell that day to contact my family/friends. I worked less than a mile from the Pentagon at the time, so I can only imagine the situation in NO. Even with all the cell towers in working order there was such a congestion.

I wonder how many towers are working in NO.
TheOneRonin
Just got an update. Here in Baton Rouge, Cingular is reporting 927 of their GSM/GPRS towers are completely non-functional. I don't have a clue what sort of % that is of their overall infrastructure, or how many other carriers' towers make be down.
Shadow
I just got this email from the commissioners office (where I work) I rolled into my bosses office and said "Send me". The funny thing is I was talking to my wife last night and I just felt this overwhelming compulsion to go there and help.

QUOTE
Commissioner's Update
Friday, September 2, 2005

Fellow DHSS employees,

As we monitor and watch the situation in the Gulf Coast states, namely Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, following the large scale devastation left behind by Hurricane Katrina, we are all similarly moved to aid those in need.

Governor Murkowski has pledged our State’s commitment to help those in the South who are in need of assistance.

The Department of Health and Social Services will be coordinating with the Department of Military and Veteran Affairs to identify resources and provide assistance as quickly as possible. We expect to have a formal request for assistance through the Emergency Management Assistance Compact in the coming days. Local and Federal officials are still assessing damage from the storm and identifying needed resources.

If you wish to lend your support to recovery efforts, please do the following:

Inform your supervisor that you are interested in being part of any response team efforts from Alaska. DHSS is establishing single points of contact in divisions to collect information on volunteers with the skills we expect to be needed in the recovery effort.
Division directors should provide a list of the names of employees who are willing and able to be deployed for inclusion on a list that will be coordinated with other State agencies.
Read and understand the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s news release that contains information on ways to help. It’s available at:
http://www.fema.gov/press/2005/katrinadonations.shtm

Remember that the most important and immediate assistance you can provide is a cash donation to a legitimate relief organization.
Thank you in advance for your willingness to help our fellow Americans. With your giving spirit and compassion, Alaska will be able to provide relief to individuals in need.



I guess I got my chance. Any of you that work for state or federal agencies may get something similar, I encourage you all to do what you can.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Dumpshock Forums © 2001-2012